Access2Research

Last updated
A video by SPARC in support of the campaign.
A normalized heatmap of per-capita signatures to the petition by U.S. state. Highest support from Massachusetts (red), lowest from Mississippi (white). Normalized heatmap of per-capita signatures to Access2Research petition by U.S. state.png
A normalized heatmap of per-capita signatures to the petition by U.S. state. Highest support from Massachusetts (red), lowest from Mississippi (white).
The Access2Research Founders, Heather Joseph, John Wilbanks, Michael W. Carroll and Mike Rossner after meeting at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Access2Research Founders.JPG
The Access2Research Founders, Heather Joseph, John Wilbanks, Michael W. Carroll and Mike Rossner after meeting at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

Access2Research is a campaign in the United States for academic journal publishing reform led by open access advocates Michael W. Carroll, Heather Joseph, Mike Rossner, and John Wilbanks. [1]

Contents

On May 20, 2012, it launched a petition to the White House to "require free access over the Internet to journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research". [2] The White House has committed to issue an official response to such petitions if they reach 25,000 signatures within 30 days. [3] Access2Research reached this milestone within two weeks. [4] [5] On February 22, 2013, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and announced an executive directive ordering all US Federal Agencies with research & development budgets over $100M to develop public access policies within twelve months.

The petition builds on previous campaigns asking scholars, publishers, funders, governments and the general public to remove paywalls to publicly funded scholarly research. It follows initiatives previously targeted at academics such as The Cost of Knowledge calling for lower prices for scholarly journals and to promote increased access to scientific information. The campaign refers to the NIH Public Access Policy [6] as an example of a mandate that should be expanded to all federally funded research. [7] [8] [9] [10]

Endorsements

The campaign's outreach was supported on the first day of its launch by Creative Commons, [11] the Public Library of Science, [12] the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, [13] RockHealth, [14] Sage Bionetworks, [15] The Cost of Knowledge, [16] the Harvard Open Access Project, [17] the Open Knowledge Foundation, [18] the Open Science Federation, [19] PatientsLikeMe [20] and Lybba. [21]

It has been publicly endorsed by several other organizations, including the Alliance for Taxpayer Access, [22] the Association of College and Research Libraries, [23] the Association of Research Libraries, [24] Arizona State University Libraries, [25] BioSharing, [26] The Center for Scholarly Communication and Digital Curation at Northwestern University, [27] figshare, [28] Genetic Alliance, [29] InTechWeb, [30] Mendeley [31] and the Wikimedia Foundation. [32]

Criticism

The petition has been criticized by a spokesperson for the Association of American Publishers who said they "oppose government mandates on research publications", [33] whereas Public Library of Science co-founder Michael Eisen referred to the petition as a "compromise" that does not go far enough, pointing out that the NIH policy allows for delayed open access. [33]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PLOS</span> Nonprofit open-access publisher

PLOS is a nonprofit publisher of open-access journals in science, technology, and medicine and other scientific literature, under an open-content license. It was founded in 2000 and launched its first journal, PLOS Biology, in October 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open access</span> Research publications distributed freely online

Open access (OA) is a set of principles and a range of practices through which research outputs are distributed online, free of access charges or other barriers. Under some models of open access publishing, barriers to copying or reuse are also reduced or removed by applying an open license for copyright.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elsevier</span> Dutch publishing and analytics company

Elsevier is a Dutch academic publishing company specializing in scientific, technical, and medical content. Its products include journals such as The Lancet, Cell, the ScienceDirect collection of electronic journals, Trends, the Current Opinion series, the online citation database Scopus, the SciVal tool for measuring research performance, the ClinicalKey search engine for clinicians, and the ClinicalPath evidence-based cancer care service. Elsevier's products and services include digital tools for data management, instruction, research analytics, and assessment.

PubMed Central (PMC) is a free digital repository that archives open access full-text scholarly articles that have been published in biomedical and life sciences journals. As one of the major research databases developed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), PubMed Central is more than a document repository. Submissions to PMC are indexed and formatted for enhanced metadata, medical ontology, and unique identifiers which enrich the XML structured data for each article. Content within PMC can be linked to other NCBI databases and accessed via Entrez search and retrieval systems, further enhancing the public's ability to discover, read and build upon its biomedical knowledge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public Knowledge Project</span> Metadata reservation project for e-journals

The Public Knowledge Project (PKP) is a non-profit research initiative that is focused on the importance of making the results of publicly funded research freely available through open access policies, and on developing strategies for making this possible including software solutions. It is a partnership between the Faculty of Education at the University of British Columbia, the Canadian Centre for Studies in Publishing at Simon Fraser University, the University of Pittsburgh, Ontario Council of University Libraries, the California Digital Library and the School of Education at Stanford University. It seeks to improve the scholarly and public quality of academic research through the development of innovative online environments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Data sharing</span>

Data sharing is the practice of making data used for scholarly research available to other investigators. Many funding agencies, institutions, and publication venues have policies regarding data sharing because transparency and openness are considered by many to be part of the scientific method.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Wilbanks</span> American entrepreneur; runs the Consent to Research Project

John Wilbanks is the Senior Medical Director at Biogen, and formerly the Chief Commons Officer at Sage Bionetworks. Previously he was a Senior Fellow at the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and at FasterCures. He is known for his work on open science and research networks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mendeley</span> Reference management software

Mendeley is a reference manager software founded in 2007 by PhD students Paul Foeckler, Victor Henning, Jan Reichelt and acquired by Elsevier in 2013. It is used to manage and share research papers and generate bibliographies for scholarly articles.

An open-access mandate is a policy adopted by a research institution, research funder, or government which requires or recommends researchers—usually university faculty or research staff and/or research grant recipients—to make their published, peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers open access (1) by self-archiving their final, peer-reviewed drafts in a freely accessible institutional repository or disciplinary repository or (2) by publishing them in an open-access journal or both.

The Fair Copyright in Research Works Act was submitted as a direct response to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy; intending to reverse it.

The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA) is a proposal to require open public access to research funded by eleven U.S. federal government agencies. It was originally proposed by Senators John Cornyn and Joe Lieberman in 2006 and then again in 2010, and then once more in 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Research Works Act</span>

The Research Works Act, 102 H.R. 3699, was a bill that was introduced in the United States House of Representatives at the 112th United States Congress on December 16, 2011, by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) and co-sponsored by Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY). The bill contained provisions to prohibit open-access mandates for federally funded research and effectively revert the United States' National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy, which requires taxpayer-funded research to be freely accessible online. If enacted, it would have also severely restricted the sharing of scientific data. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, of which Issa is the chair. Similar bills were introduced in 2008 and 2009 but have not been enacted since.

Academic journal publishing reform is the advocacy for changes in the way academic journals are created and distributed in the age of the Internet and the advent of electronic publishing. Since the rise of the Internet, people have organized campaigns to change the relationships among and between academic authors, their traditional distributors and their readership. Most of the discussion has centered on taking advantage of benefits offered by the Internet's capacity for widespread distribution of reading material.

The Academic Spring was the designation, inspired by the Arab Spring, used for a short time in 2012 to indicate movements by academics, researchers, and scholars opposing the restrictive copyright and circulation of traditional academic journals and promoting free access online instead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act</span>

The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR) is a bill in the United States that would mandate earlier public release of taxpayer-funded research. The bill has been introduced in 2013, 2015, and 2017. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) introduced the Senate version, while the bill was introduced to the House by Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Mike Doyle (D-Penn.) and Kevin Yoder (R-Kans.). The bill is a successor to the Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), which had been introduced in 2006, 2010, and 2012.

The NIH Public Access Policy is an open access mandate, drafted in 2004 and mandated in 2008, requiring that research papers describing research funded by the National Institutes of Health must be available to the public free through PubMed Central within 12 months of publication. PubMed Central is the self-archiving repository in which authors or their publishers deposit their publications. Copyright is retained by the usual holders, but authors may submit papers with one of the Creative Commons licenses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cameron Neylon</span>

David Cameron Neylon is an advocate for open access and Professor of Research Communications at the Centre for Culture and Technology at Curtin University. From 2012 - 2015 they were the Advocacy Director at the Public Library of Science.

OurResearch, formerly known as ImpactStory, is a nonprofit organization which creates and distributes tools and services for libraries, institutions and researchers. The organization follows open practices with their data, code, and governance. OurResearch is funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and Arcadia Fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Library Genesis</span> File-sharing website for print publications

Library Genesis (Libgen) is a file-sharing based shadow library website for scholarly journal articles, academic and general-interest books, images, comics, audiobooks, and magazines. The site enables free access to content that is otherwise paywalled or not digitized elsewhere. Libgen describes itself as a "links aggregator", providing a searchable database of items "collected from publicly available public Internet resources" as well as files uploaded "from users".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of open access</span>

The idea and practise of providing free online access to journal articles began at least a decade before the term "open access" was formally coined. Computer scientists had been self-archiving in anonymous ftp archives since the 1970s and physicists had been self-archiving in arXiv since the 1990s. The Subversive Proposal to generalize the practice was posted in 1994.

References

  1. "Access2:Research: About". Access2Research. 2012-04-27. Archived from the original on 2012-05-24. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  2. "Require free access over the Internet to scientific journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research. | The White House". Wh.gov. 2012-05-13. Archived from the original on 2012-05-23. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  3. "A good problem to have: Raising the signature threshold for White House petitions". whitehouse.gov . 2011-10-03. Archived from the original on January 23, 2017. Retrieved 2012-05-27 via National Archives.
  4. "US open-access petition hits 25,000 signatures in two weeks". Research Information. Archived from the original on 2014-04-07. Retrieved 7 June 2012.
  5. Neylon, Cameron (4 June 2012). "25000 Signatures in Two Weeks: What Does It Mean?". PLoS Blogs Network. Archived from the original on 28 October 2012.
  6. "NIH Public Access Policy Details". nih.gov. Archived from the original on 2011-11-01. Retrieved 2012-05-27.
  7. Taylor, Mike (22 May 2012). "US petition could tip the scales in favour of open access publishing". The Guardian . Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  8. Howard, Jennifer (23 May 2012). "Petition urges White House to Require public access to federally financed research". Chronicle of Higher Education . Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  9. Arbesman, Samuel (23 May 2012). "A Petition for Free Online Access of Taxpayer-funded Research". Wired . Retrieved 25 May 2012.
  10. Poynder, Richard (25 May 2012). "Open Access: The People's Petition". Open & Shut?. Retrieved 27 May 2012.
  11. "Sign the U.S. Petition to Support Public Access to Publicly Funded Scientific Research". Creative Commons. 20 May 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  12. "Tell the White House to Expand Open Access to Federally Funded Research". Public Library of Science. 20 May 2012. Archived from the original on 20 June 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  13. "Sign the White House Petition on Open Access to Research Today!". SPARC. Archived from the original on 2012-07-02. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  14. "Join Access2Research and Free Taxpayer-Funded Research". RockHealth. 20 May 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  15. "Sage Bionetworks". Sagebase.org. 2012-04-18. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  16. "The Cost of Knowledge". The Cost of Knowledge. 2012-01-21. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  17. "Harvard Open Access Project". Cyber.law.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  18. "Petition the White House to Open Up Publicly Funded Research | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog". Open Knowledge Foundation. 2012-05-21. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  19. "Open Access Federation to open science". Open Science Federation. Archived from the original on 2012-06-18. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  20. "Free Up Research! On Our Way to 25,000 Signatures". blog.patientslikeme.com. 23 May 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  21. "Don't pay twice for biomedical research". Lybba. 20 May 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  22. "Sign the White House Petition on Open Access to Research Today! (Alliance for Taxpayer Access)". Taxpayeraccess.org. 2012-05-21. Archived from the original on 2013-01-12. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  23. "ACRL Urges Librarians to Sign Research Access Petition". Lj.libraryjournal.com. 2012-05-22. Archived from the original on May 25, 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  24. "Call to Action: Sign the White House Petition for Public Access to Federally Funded Research". Association of Research Libraries. Archived from the original on 2012-10-19. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  25. "Increasing Public Access to Federally Funded Research | The Library Channel". Lib.asu.edu. 2012-05-21. Archived from the original on 2012-06-10. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  26. Sansone, Susanna-A (2012-05-21). "BioSharing: Open access petition - White House's "We the People"". Blog.biosharing.org. Archived from the original on 2015-05-04. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  27. "White House Petition on Open Access | Center for Scholarly Communication & Digital Curation". Cscdc.northwestern.edu. 2012-05-21. Archived from the original on 2013-02-01. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  28. "#OAMonday - A call to action". Figshare.com. 2012-05-21. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  29. "Advocacy, Education & Empowerment". Genetic Alliance. 2012-04-17. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  30. "To know the importance of providing free access to taxpayer-funded research | InTechWeb Blog". Intechweb.wordpress.com. 2012-05-22. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  31. "Support free access to scientific journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research. #OAMonday | Mendeley Blog". Blog.mendeley.com. 2012-05-21. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  32. "Wikimedia Foundation endorses mandates for free access to publicly funded research — Wikimedia blog". Blog.wikimedia.org. 25 May 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-26.
  33. 1 2 Corbyn, Zoë (2012). "White House petitioned to make research free to access". Nature . doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10723. S2CID   167402674.