Scientific journal

Last updated
Cover of the first issue of Nature (4 November 1869) Nature cover, November 4, 1869.jpg
Cover of the first issue of Nature (4 November 1869)

In academic publishing, a scientific journal is a periodical publication with the purpose of furthering the progress of science by disseminating new research findings to the scientific community. [1] Such journals serve as a platform for researchers, scholars, and scientists to share their latest discoveries, insights, and methodologies across a multitude of scientific disciplines.

Contents

Unlike the situation in professional or trade magazines, the articles are mostly written by scientists rather than staff writers employed by the journal. Scientific journals are characterized by their rigorous peer-review process, which aims to ensure the validity, reliability, and quality as well as supporting the integrity (through reproducibility and replicability) of the published content. [1] [2] In peer review, submitted articles are reviewed by active scientists (peers) to ensure scientific rigor. With origins in the 17th century, the publication of scientific journals has evolved substantially, advancing scientific knowledge, fostering academic discourse, and facilitating collaboration within the scientific community. [3] [4]

There are thousands of scientific journals in publication, with scopes ranging from the general sciences, to highly specialized fields. [2] [3] These journals publish a variety of articles including original research, reviews, and perspectives, each serving distinct purposes in academia. The advent of electronic publishing has made scientific journals more accessible.

Content

Scientific journals

As of 2012, there are 28,100 scientific journals being actively published, [5] and many more that were published at in the past (see list of scientific journals). Most journals are highly specialized, although some of the oldest journals such as Science and Nature publish articles and scientific papers across a wide range of scientific fields. [6]

Scientific journals are superficially similar to professional magazines or trade journals. These are some of the more salient characteristics of the former:

In contrast, trade journals and professional magazines

Types

There are several types of content in scientific journals; the exact terminology and definitions vary by field and specific journal, but often include:

Article sections

Many scientific journals follow the general IMRAD scheme recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Each article has several different sections, including the following: [13]

Reading an article in a scientific journal usually entails first reading the title, to see if it is related to the desired topic. If it is, the next step is to read the abstract (or summary or conclusion, if the abstract is missing), to determine if the article is worth reading. [14]

Publishing research results is an essential part of helping science to advance. [15] If scientists are describing experiments or calculations, they should also explain how they did them so that an independent researcher could repeat the experiment or calculation to verify the results, or so that they could evaluate whatever the research article's findings were. [16] Each journal article becomes part of the permanent scientific record. [17]

Scope

Articles in scientific journals can be used in research and higher education. An essential part of a scientific article is citation of earlier work. The impact of articles and journals is often assessed by counting citations (citation impact). In a scientific research group or academic department it is usual for the content of current scientific journals to be discussed in journal clubs. Public funding bodies often require research results to be published in scientific journals. Academic credentials for promotion into academic ranks are established in large part by the number and impact of scientific articles published.

The authors of scientific articles are not journalists; typically, a graduate student or a researcher writes a paper with a professor. As such, the authors are unpaid and receive no compensation from the journal. However, their funding bodies may require them to publish in scientific journals. Active academic researchers are expected to publish their work in scientific journals. This is important for a researcher's career, because their qualifications and performance are often evaluated based on publication count (number of articles accepted to scientific journals) and publication impact (how important the journal is and how often the article is cited). This is one of the main criteria for candidates for tenured positions.

History

Title page of the first volume of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, the first journal in the world exclusively devoted to science Philosophical Transactions Volume 1 frontispiece.jpg
Title page of the first volume of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society , the first journal in the world exclusively devoted to science

In the early 17th century, scientists wrote letters to each other, and included scientific ideas with them. By the mid-17th century, scientists began to hold meetings to share their ideas. Eventually, this led to founding organizations, such as the Royal Society (1660) and the French Academy of Sciences (1666). [3] In 1665, the French Journal des sçavans and the English Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society began systematically publishing research results. Over a thousand periodicals, some ephemeral, were founded in the 18th century, and the number has increased since then. [4]

Peer review did not begin until the 1970s, and was seen as a way of enabling researchers who were not as well-known to have their papers published in journals that were more prestigious. Though it was originally done by mailing copies of papers to reviewers, it is often done online now. [18]

Publishing process

The paper is submitted to the journal office, where the editor considers the paper for suitability, potential scientific impact, and novelty. Articles tend to be highly technical, representing the latest theoretical research and experimental results in the field of science covered by the journal. Usually, rigorous rules of scientific writing are enforced by the editors; however, these rules may vary from journal to journal, especially between journals from different publishers.

If the journal's editor considers the paper appropriate, it is submitted for scholarly peer review. The paper is sent for approval to two or three reviewers for evaluation before it can be deemed ready for publication. Reviewers are expected to check the paper for soundness of its scientific argument, including whether the author(s) are sufficiently acquainted with recent relevant research that bears on their study, whether the data was collected or considered appropriately, and whether the data discussed supports the conclusion offered and the implications suggested. Novelty is key: existing work must be appropriately considered and referenced, and new results improving on the state of the art presented. Reviewers are usually unpaid and not a part of the journal staff—instead, they should be "peers", i.e. researchers in the same field as the paper in question. Both authors and reviewers are typically scientists employed and paid by universities, research institutes or corporations, or working on a research grant.

Standards and impact

The standards that a journal uses to determine publication can vary widely. Some journals, such as Nature , Science , PNAS , and Physical Review Letters , seek to publish articles that mark a fundamental breakthrough in their respective fields.[ citation needed ] In many fields, a formal or informal hierarchy of scientific journals exists; the most prestigious journal in a field tends to be the most selective in terms of the articles it will publish, and usually will also have the highest impact factor. In some countries, journal rankings are used for funding decisions [19] and even evaluation of individual researchers. [20]

Reproducibility and replicability

For scientific journals, reproducibility and replicability of results are core concepts that allow other scientists to check and reproduce the results under the same or similar conditions described in the paper or carry out under changed conditions of measurement and explain the difference in results. While reproducibility is expected, verification of reproducibility by a third party is not generally required for publication. [21] The reproducibility of results presented in an article is therefore judged implicitly by the quality of the procedures reported and agreement with the data provided. (Some journals in the field of chemistry such as Inorganic Syntheses and Organic Syntheses require independent reproduction of the results presented as part of the review process.)

The inability of independent researchers to reproduce published results is widespread, with 70% of researchers reporting failure to reproduce another scientist's results, including more than half who report failing to reproduce their own experiments. [22] Sources of irreproducibility vary, including publication of falsified or misrepresented data and poor detailing of procedures. [23]

Electronic publishing

Electronic publishing in the context of the scientific journal is the presentation of scholarly scientific results in only an electronic (non-paper) form. This is from its first write-up, or creation, to its publication or dissemination. [24]

Many journals are electronically available in formats readable on screen via web browsers, as well as in portable document format PDF, suitable for printing or storing on a local desktop or laptop computer. New tools such as JATS and Utopia Documents provide a 'bridge' to the 'web-versions' in that they connect the content in PDF versions directly to the World Wide Web via hyperlinks that are created 'on-the-fly'. The PDF version of an article is usually seen as the version of record, but the matter is subject to some debate. [25]

Electronic counterparts of established print journals promote and deliver rapid dissemination of peer-reviewed and edited, "published" articles. Peer review, copyediting, page makeup, and other steps in the process support rapid dissemination. [26]

Other benefits of electronically published scientific journals are easy availability of supplementary materials (data, graphics and video), lower cost, and availability to more people, especially scientists from non-developed countries. Hence, research results from more developed nations are becoming more accessible to scientists from non-developed countries. [24]

By 2006, almost all scientific journals have, while retaining their peer-review process, established electronic versions; a number have moved entirely to electronic publication. Many journals now publish the final papers in their electronic version as soon as they are ready, without waiting for the assembly of a complete issue, as is necessary with paper. In many fields in which even greater speed is wanted, the role of the journal at disseminating the latest research has largely been replaced by preprint servers such as arXiv.org. Almost all such articles are eventually published in traditional journals, which still provide an important role in quality control, archiving, and establishing scientific credit.

Cost

Traditional scientific journals require a paid subscription to access published articles. [27] Many scientists and librarians have long protested these costs, especially as they see these payments going to large for-profit publishing houses. [28]

To allow their researchers online access to journals, many universities purchase site licenses, permitting access from anywhere in the university, and, with appropriate authorization, by university-affiliated users at home or elsewhere. These may be much more expensive than the cost for a print subscription. Despite the transition to electronic publishing, the costs of site licenses continue to rise relative to universities' budgets. This is known as the serials crisis . [29]

Publications by scholarly societies, also known as not-for-profit-publishers, usually cost less than commercial publishers, but their subscription costs are still usually several thousand dollars a year. In general, this money is used to fund the activities of the scientific societies that run such journals, or is invested in providing further scholarly resources for scientists; thus, the money remains in and benefits the scientific sphere.

Concerns about cost and open access have led to the creation of free-access journals such as the Public Library of Science (PLoS) family and partly open or reduced-cost journals such as the Journal of High Energy Physics . However, professional editors still have to be paid, and PLoS still relies heavily on donations from foundations to cover the majority of its operating costs; smaller journals do not often have access to such resources.[ citation needed ] Many open access journals may charge authors a fee for review or publication, rather than charging readers a fee for access. [28]

Based on statistical arguments, it has been shown that electronic publishing online provides wider dissemination and increase the average number of citations an article receives. [30]

Traditionally, the author of an article was required to transfer the copyright to the journal publisher. Publishers claimed this was necessary in order to protect authors' rights, and to coordinate permissions for reprints or other use. However, many authors, especially those active in the open access movement, found this unsatisfactory, [31] and have used their influence to effect a gradual move towards a license to publish instead. Under such a system, the publisher has permission to edit, print, and distribute the article commercially, but the authors retain the other rights.

Even if they retain the copyright to an article, most journals allow certain rights to their authors. These rights usually include the ability to reuse parts of the paper in the author's future work, and allow the author to distribute a limited number of copies. In the print format, such copies are called reprints; in the electronic format, they are called postprints. Some publishers, for example the American Physical Society, also grant the author the right to post and update the article on the author's or employer's website and on free e-print servers, to grant permission to others to use or reuse figures, and even to reprint the article as long as no fee is charged. [32] The rise of open access journals, in which the author retains the copyright but must pay a publication charge, such as the Public Library of Science family of journals, is another recent response to copyright concerns. [33]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 "What Are Scientific Journals?". American Psychological Association. September 2017. Archived from the original on September 23, 2021. Retrieved 2023-01-26.
  2. 1 2 3 Lilla, Rick (November 11, 2022). "What's the difference between a scholarly journal, a professional journal, a peer reviewed journal, and a magazine?". Lock Haven University Libraries. Archived from the original on May 24, 2018. Retrieved January 25, 2023.
  3. 1 2 3 Swoger, Bonnie (July 27, 2012). "The (mostly true) origins of the scientific journal". Scientific American. Archived from the original on July 27, 2016. Retrieved January 25, 2023.
  4. 1 2 D. A. Kronick, History of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2nd ed. Scarecrow, 1976
  5. Ware, Mark; Michael Mabe (November 2012). "The stm report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing" (PDF). International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 24, 2012. Retrieved January 25, 2023.
  6. Panter, Michaela (2023-01-25). "How to Choose Between General and Specialized Journals | AJE". American Journal Experts. Archived from the original on 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2023-01-25.
  7. "What is a Scholarly Journal?". Victor Valley College Library. January 25, 2023. Archived from the original on March 14, 2016. Retrieved January 25, 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 Chan, Warren (2018-07-24). "What Is the Value of Publishing?". ACS Nano. 12 (7): 6345–6346. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05296 . ISSN   1936-0851. PMID   30041294. S2CID   206722747.
  9. Taylor and Francis Author Services, Different types of research articles: A guide for early career researchers, accessed on 16 February 2025
  10. Cambridge Core, Behavioral and Brain Sciences: An International Journal of Current Research and Theory with Open Peer Commentary, Volume 16, Issue 1 (March 1993), accessed on 17 February 2025
  11. "JoVE - Peer Reviewed Scientific Video Journal - Methods and Protocols". jove.com. Archived from the original on 22 March 2018. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  12. "Научный журнал "Видеонаука"". Scientific journal "Videonauka". Archived from the original on 2016-03-11.
  13. "Major Parts of a Research Article" (PDF). Marymount University Library & Learning Services. January 25, 2023. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 18, 2015. Retrieved January 25, 2023.
  14. Subramanyam, RV (January–April 2013). "Art of reading a journal article: Methodically and effectively". Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 17 (1): 65–70. doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.110733 . PMC   3687192 . PMID   23798833.
  15. "Publish or perish? - Understanding Science". University of California Berkeley. 2022-04-14. Retrieved 2023-01-26.
  16. "How and Why Do Scientists Share Results". National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Retrieved January 26, 2023.
  17. Gamble, Rhianna. "LibGuides: Guide to Getting Published in Journals: Why publish in journals?". ifis.libguides.com. Retrieved 2023-01-26.
  18. "Peer Review – A Historical Perspective : Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard". mitcommlab.mit.edu. Retrieved 2023-01-26.
  19. "Background". julkaisufoorumi.fi. Archived from the original on 30 September 2017. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  20. "FAQ". julkaisufoorumi.fi. Archived from the original on 27 November 2017. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  21. "Editorial and Journal Policies". PNAS. Retrieved 2023-04-20.
  22. Baker, Monya (2016-05-01). "1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility". Nature. 533 (7604): 452–454. Bibcode:2016Natur.533..452B. doi: 10.1038/533452a . ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   27225100. S2CID   4460617.
  23. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. National Academies of Sciences and Engineering. 2019-05-07. ISBN   978-0-309-48616-3.
  24. 1 2 Boyce, Peter B.; Heather Dalterio (January 1996). "Electronic Publishing of Scientific Journals" (Article available to the public in HTML.). Physics Today . 49 (1). American Institute of Physics: 42. Bibcode:1996PhT....49a..42B. doi:10.1063/1.881598. Archived from the original on 2011-04-10.
  25. Pettifer, S.; McDermott, P.; Marsh, J.; Thorne, D.; Villeger, A.; Attwood, T.K. (2011). "Ceci n'est pas un hamburger: modelling and representing the scholarly article". Learned Publishing. 24 (3): 207–220. doi: 10.1087/20110309 .
  26. Swygart-Hobaugh, Amanda J.; Kling, Rob. "The Internet and the Velocity of Scholarly Journal Publishing". scholarworks.iu.edu. Archived from the original on 2016-10-27. Retrieved 2016-10-26.
  27. Van Noorden, Richard (March 2013). "Open access: The true cost of science publishing" . Nature. 495 (7442): 426–429. Bibcode:2013Natur.495..426V. doi:10.1038/495426a . Retrieved 26 March 2025.
  28. 1 2 Weinstein, Deborah (1 Feb 2012). "Elsevier begins outreach as push-back on publisher threatens to widen". MM&M. Archived from the original on 2018-02-15.
  29. Sample, Ian (24 April 2012). "Harvard University says it can't afford journal publishers' prices". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 7 December 2016.
  30. Lawrence, Steve. "Online Or Invisible?". NEC Research Institute. Archived from the original on 2007-03-16.
  31. Di Cosmo, Roberto (June 2006). "The Role of Public Administrations in The ICT Era" (PDF). UPGRADE: The European Journal for the Informatics Professional. 7 (3): 41–8. ISSN   1684-5285. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-07-17.
  32. "APS Copyright Policies and Frequently Asked Questions". Archived from the original on 2006-10-09.
  33. Is it time to end copyright for scientific journals? Gizmodo, 2011

Sources

Further reading