Plan S

Last updated

Plan S is an initiative for open-access science publishing launched in 2018 [1] [2] by "cOAlition S", [3] a consortium of national research agencies and funders from twelve European countries. The plan requires scientists and researchers who benefit from state-funded research organisations and institutions to publish their work in open repositories or in journals that are available to all by 2021. [4] The "S" stands for "shock". [5]

Contents

Per 2017 figures, the mandate of Plan S will cover about 6% of worldwide research articles, including about one third of articles in Nature and Science . Major publishers have been planning to accommodate this mandate by offering (or allowing) open access options to authors. [6]

Principles

The plan, launched in 2018, was structured around ten principles. [3] The key principle states that by 2021, research funded by public or private grants must be published in open-access journals or platforms, or made immediately available in open access repositories without an embargo. The ten principles are:

  1. authors should retain copyright on their publications, which must be published under an open license such as Creative Commons;
  2. the members of the coalition should establish robust criteria and requirements for compliant open access journals and platforms;
  3. they should also provide incentives for the creation of compliant open access journals and platforms if they do not yet exist;
  4. publication fees should be covered by the funders or universities, not individual researchers;
  5. such publication fees should be standardized and capped;
  6. universities, research organizations, and libraries should align their policies and strategies;
  7. for books and monographs, [7] the timeline may be extended beyond 2021;
  8. open archives and repositories are acknowledged for their importance;
  9. hybrid open-access journals are not compliant with the key principle;
  10. members of the coalition should monitor and sanction non-compliance.

In October 2023, cOAlition S released a proposal that would "reimagine scientific publishing without any author fees" (diamond open access). [8] [9]

Specific implementation guidance

Diagram of Plan S requirements (January 2019) 2019 Requirements for Plan S compliance in one page by Philipp Zumstein.png
Diagram of Plan S requirements (January 2019)

A task force of Science Europe, led by John-Arne Røttingen (RCN) and David Sweeney (UKRI), has developed a specific implementation guidance on the Plan S principles, released on 27 November 2018. [10] The development of the implementation guidance also drew on input from interested parties such as research institutions, researchers, universities, funders, charities, publishers, and civil society. [11]

Transition period

During a transition period, it will remain permissible to publish in so-called transformative journals, defined as hybrid journals that are covered by an agreement to become a full open-access venue. [12] The contracts of such transformative agreements need to be made publicly available (including costs), and may not last beyond 2023. [10]

Green open access

Publishing in any journal will continue to be permissible subject to the condition that a copy of the manuscript accepted by the journal, or the final published article, will be deposited in an approved open-access repository (green open access) with no embargo on access and with a CC BY licence. [12] As part of the Rights retention strategy, Coalition S plans to override journal policies that would forbid this. [13] [14] As of October 2021, this was done for over 500 works published in various venues. [15]

Licensing and rights

To re-use scholarly content, proper attribution needs to be given to the authors, and publications need to be granted a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to share and adapt the work for any purpose, including commercially. Scholarly articles must be published under a Creative Commons Attribution license CC BY 4.0, or alternatively CC BY-SA 4.0 Share-alike or CC0 Public Domain. [10] In particular, this allows them to be used in Wikipedia. [15]

Mandatory criteria for open access journals and platforms

Open access journals and platforms need to meet the following criteria to be compliant with Plan S:

Mirror journals, where one part is subscription based, with the other part being open access, are considered to be de facto hybrid journals. Mirror journals are not compliant with Plan S unless they are a part of a transformative agreement.

Public feedback

The implementation guidance was open for general feedback until 8 February 2019. [16] On 31 May 2019 the cOAlition S published an updated version of their implementation guidance in light of the feedback received during the consultation. [17]

COAlition S

Some commentators have suggested that the adoption of Plan S in one region would encourage its adoption in other regions. [18]

Member organisations

As of October 2018, organisations in the coalition behind Plan S included: [19]

International organizations that are members:

Plan S is also supported by:

Public figures

Robert-Jan Smits stepped down in March 2019 [42] and later wrote a book about Plan S. [43] Johan Rooryck of Leiden University was appointed Open Access Champion by cOAlition S on 28 August 2019; [44]

Organisations that withdrew or declined to join

In October 2018 the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) made it clear that US federal funders would not be signing up to Plan S. In an interview with the American Institute of Physics published 30 April 2019, OSTP Director Kelvin Droegemeier stated with regard to Plan S: "One of the things this government will not do is to tell researchers where they have to publish their papers. That is absolutely up to the scholar who's doing the publication. There's just no question about that." [45]

In 2018 Swedish Riksbank's Jubilee Fond (RJ) used to be a member, [46] but left the coalition in 2019 after concerns about the timelines of Plan S. [47]

On 25 October 2019, Vijay Raghavan announced that India would not be joining cOAlition S, [48] despite his supportive comments earlier in the same year. [27]

The European Research Council initially supported Coalition S in 2018, [49] but withdrew support in July 2020. [50]

Reactions

Institutional reactions

The following institutional statements of support were issued:

Reactions by researchers

Reactions included an Open Letter, signed by more than 1790 researchers, expressing their concerns about perceived unintended outcomes of the Plan if implemented as stated before the publication of the specific implementation guidance. [84] Another Open Letter in support of mandatory open access was issued after the publication of the specific implementation guide, and had been signed by over 1,900 researchers by the end of 2018. However, it did not reference Plan S specifically. [85] [86]

Stephen Curry, a structural biologist and open access advocate at Imperial College London, called the policy a "significant shift" and "a very powerful declaration". [87] Ralf Schimmer, head of the Scientific Information Provision at the Max Planck Digital Library, told The Scientist that "This will put increased pressure on publishers and on the consciousness of individual researchers that an ecosystem change is possible ... There has been enough nice language and waiting and hoping and saying please. Research communities just aren't willing to tolerate procrastination anymore." [88] Political activist George Monbiot – while acknowledging that the plan was "not perfect" – wrote in The Guardian that the publishers' responses to Plan S was "ballistic", and argued that Elsevier's response regarding Wikipedia "inadvertently remind[ed] us of what happened to the commercial encyclopedias". [89] He said that, until Plan S is implemented, "The ethical choice is to read the stolen material published by Sci-Hub." [89] Herpetologist Malcolm L. McCallum suggested that science requires a diversity of publishing types to serve the needs of the entire scientific community. [90]

Individual Plan S policies have also received a mixed reception from academics. For example, the Rights Retention Strategy has been enthusiastically promoted by Cambridge neuroscientist Stephen Eglen because it can be used by anyone to make their work open access. [91] In contrast, computational biochemist Lynn Kamerlin criticized the Rights Retention Strategy because, while it would create obligations for grantees it was unclear whether it would create legal obligations for publishers. [92] Similarly, Shaun Khoo has argued that the Rights Retention Strategy is a complex approach that creates an unrealistic burden for authors and may produce legal risk for authors, institutions and readers. [93]

Reactions by journals and publishers

The plan was initially met with opposition from a number of publishers of non-open access journals, as well as from learned societies. [94] Springer Nature "urge[d] research funding agencies to align rather than act in small groups in ways that are incompatible with each other, and for policymakers to also take this global view into account", adding that removing publishing options from researchers "fails to take this into account and potentially undermines the whole research publishing system". [87] The AAAS, publisher of the journal Science , argued that Plan S "will not support high-quality peer-review, research publication and dissemination", and that its implementation "would disrupt scholarly communications, be a disservice to researchers, and impinge academic freedom" and "would also be unsustainable for the Science family of journals". [87] [88] Tom Reller of Elsevier said, "if you think that information should be free of charge, go to Wikipedia". [95]

On 12 September 2018 UBS repeated their "sell" advice on Elsevier (RELX) stocks. [96] Elsevier's share price fell by 13% between 28 Aug and 19 September 2018. [97]

According to the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), whose aim is to transform the business model of the largest publishers (by supporting projects like Project DEAL), Plan S puts smaller and emerging fully open access publishers at a competitive disadvantage, and potentially harms their prospects. Pure "gold" open access publishers may be put out of business by incentivizing authors to publish with large publishers which have the market power to negotiate their transition plans with funders, while no incentives are provided to authors to publish with smaller fully open access publishers and scholarly societies. [98]

Policy changes by journals and publishers

On 28 November 2018 the journal Epidemiology and Infection published by Cambridge University Press announced that it would convert to the open access model of publication from 1 January 2019, citing changed funder policies and Plan S. [99]

On 8 April 2020, Springer Nature announced that many of its journals, including Nature , would become compatible with Plan S by publishing open access articles from 2021 and committing to an eventual transition to full open access. [100] [101]

On 15 January 2021, the AAAS, which publishes Science, announced a trial OA policy that accommodates Plan S's green open access rules. [102] This policy allows the distribution of an article's accepted version under a free license, without embargo and without charge. However, this is only permitted to authors who are under mandates by their Coalition S funders.

In February 2021, more than 50 publishers, including Elsevier, Wiley and Springer Nature, announced their opposition to the rights retention strategy of Coalition S. More specifically, Springer Nature announced their intention to override that strategy by making authors sign a license to that effect. [103] [104]

Policy changes by member organizations

In 2024, the Gates Foundation announced a "preprint-centric" open access policy, and their intention to stop paying article-processing charges. This policy is not “entirely in line with cOAlition S”, because it does not mandate that an accepted manuscript be openly accessible. [105]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Academic publishing</span> Subfield of publishing distributing academic research and scholarship

Academic publishing is the subfield of publishing which distributes academic research and scholarship. Most academic work is published in academic journal articles, books or theses. The part of academic written output that is not formally published but merely printed up or posted on the Internet is often called "grey literature". Most scientific and scholarly journals, and many academic and scholarly books, though not all, are based on some form of peer review or editorial refereeing to qualify texts for publication. Peer review quality and selectivity standards vary greatly from journal to journal, publisher to publisher, and field to field.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open access</span> Research publications distributed freely online

Open access (OA) is a set of principles and a range of practices through which nominally copyrightable publications are delivered to readers free of access charges or other barriers. With open access strictly defined, or libre open access, barriers to copying or reuse are also reduced or removed by applying an open license for copyright, which regulates post-publication uses of the work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elsevier</span> Dutch publishing and analytics company

Elsevier is a Dutch academic publishing company specializing in scientific, technical, and medical content. Its products include journals such as The Lancet, Cell, the ScienceDirect collection of electronic journals, Trends, the Current Opinion series, the online citation database Scopus, the SciVal tool for measuring research performance, the ClinicalKey search engine for clinicians, and the ClinicalPath evidence-based cancer care service. Elsevier's products and services include digital tools for data management, instruction, research analytics, and assessment. Elsevier is part of the RELX Group, known until 2015 as Reed Elsevier, a publicly traded company. According to RELX reports, in 2022 Elsevier published more than 600,000 articles annually in over 2,800 journals; as of 2018 its archives contained over 17 million documents and 40,000 e-books, with over one billion annual downloads.

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly mean number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal, as indexed by Clarivate's Web of Science.

The Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development, also called Framework Programmes or abbreviated FP1 to FP9, are funding programmes created by the European Union/European Commission to support and foster research in the European Research Area (ERA). Starting in 2014, the funding programmes were named Horizon.

A hybrid open-access journal is a subscription journal in which some of the articles are open access. This status typically requires the payment of a publication fee to the publisher in order to publish an article open access, in addition to the continued payment of subscriptions to access all other content. Strictly speaking, the term "hybrid open-access journal" is incorrect, possibly misleading, as using the same logic such journals could also be called "hybrid subscription journals". Simply using the term "hybrid access journal" is accurate.

An open-access mandate is a policy adopted by a research institution, research funder, or government which requires or recommends researchers—usually university faculty or research staff and/or research grant recipients—to make their published, peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers open access (1) by self-archiving their final, peer-reviewed drafts in a freely accessible institutional repository or disciplinary repository or (2) by publishing them in an open-access journal or both.

<i>eLife</i> Open-access scientific journal

eLife is a not-for-profit, peer-reviewed, open access, science publisher for the biomedical and life sciences. It was established at the end of 2012 by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Max Planck Society, and Wellcome Trust, following a workshop held in 2010 at the Janelia Farm Research Campus. Together, these organizations provided the initial funding to support the business and publishing operations. In 2016, the organizations committed US$26 million to continue publication of the journal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predatory publishing</span> Fraudulent business model for scientific publications

Predatory publishing, also write-only publishing or deceptive publishing, is an exploitative academic publishing business model, where the journal or publisher prioritizes self-interest at the expense of scholarship. It is characterized by misleading information, deviates from the standard peer-review process, is highly non-transparent, and often utilizes aggressive solicitation practices.

An article processing charge (APC), also known as a publication fee, is a fee which is sometimes charged to authors. Most commonly, it is involved in making an academic work available as open access (OA), in either a full OA journal or in a hybrid journal. This fee may be paid by the author, the author's institution, or their research funder. Sometimes, publication fees are also involved in traditional journals or for paywalled content. Some publishers waive the fee in cases of hardship or geographic location, but this is not a widespread practice. An article processing charge does not guarantee that the author retains copyright to the work, or that it will be made available under a Creative Commons license.

OurResearch, formerly known as ImpactStory, is a nonprofit organization that creates and distributes tools and services for libraries, institutions and researchers. The organization follows open practices with their data, code, and governance. OurResearch is funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and Arcadia Fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sci-Hub</span> Scientific research paper file sharing website

Sci-Hub is a shadow library website that provides free access to millions of research papers, regardless of copyright, by bypassing publishers' paywalls in various ways. Unlike Library Genesis, it does not provide access to books. Sci-Hub was founded in Kazakhstan by Alexandra Elbakyan in 2011, in response to the high cost of research papers behind paywalls. The site is extensively used worldwide. In September 2019, the site's operator(s) said that it served approximately 400,000 requests per day. In addition to its intensive use, Sci-Hub stands out among other shadow libraries because of its easy use/reliability and because of the enormous size of its collection; a 2018 study estimated that Sci-Hub provided access to most of the scholarly publications with issued DOI numbers. On 15 July 2022, Sci-Hub reported that its collection comprised 88,343,822 files. Since December 2020, the site has paused uploads due to legal troubles.

The following is a timeline of the international movement for open access to scholarly communication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open access in India</span> Overview of the culture and regulation of open access in India

In India, the Open Access movement started in May 2004, when two workshops were organized by the M S Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai. In 2006, the National Knowledge Commission in its recommendations proposed that "access to knowledge is the most fundamental way of increasing the opportunities and reach of individuals and groups". In 2011, the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) began requiring that its grantees provide open access to funded research, the Open Access India forum formulated a draft policy on Open Access for India. The Shodhganga, a digital repository for theses, was also established in 2011 with the aim of promoting and preserving academic research. The University Grants Commission (UGC) made it mandatory for scholars to deposit their theses in Shodhganga, as per the Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M. Phil./Ph.D. Degrees Regulations, 2016. Currently, the Directory of Open Access Journals lists 326 open access journals published in India, of which 233 have no fees.

Project DEAL is a consortium-like structure spearheaded by the German Rectors' Conference, on behalf of its fellow members in the Alliance of Science Organizations in Germany and tasked with negotiating nationwide transformative open access agreements with the three largest commercial publishers of scholarly journals for the benefit of all German academic institutions, including universities, research institutes, and their libraries. Through each of these agreements, the consortium aims to secure immediate open access publication of all new research articles by authors from German institutions, permanent full-text access to the publisher's complete journal portfolio, and fair pricing for these services according to a simple cost model based on the number of articles published.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of open access</span>

The idea and practise of providing free online access to journal articles began at least a decade before the term "open access" was formally coined. Computer scientists had been self-archiving in anonymous ftp archives since the 1970s and physicists had been self-archiving in arXiv since the 1990s. The Subversive Proposal to generalize the practice was posted in 1994.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open access in Australia</span> Overview of the culture and regulation of open access in Australia

Open access (OA) to academic publications has seen extensive growth in Australia since the first open access university repository was established in 2001 and OA is a fundamental part of the scholarly publishing and research landscape in Australia. There are open access policies at the two major research funders: The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and Australian Research Council (ARC) and around half of Australian Universities have an OA policy or statement. Open Access Australasia, the Council of Australian University Librarians (CAUL), and the Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) are advocates for Open Access and related issues in Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diamond open access</span> Open access distributed with no fees to author and reader

Diamond open access refers to academic texts published/distributed/preserved with no fees to either reader or author. Alternative labels include platinum open access, non-commercial open access, cooperative open access or, more recently, open access commons. While these terms were first coined in the 2000s and the 2010s, they have been retroactively applied to a variety of structures and forms of publishing, from subsidized university publishers to volunteer-run cooperatives that existed in prior decades.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert-Jan Smits</span> Dutch administrator

Robert-Jan Smits has been the President of the Executive Board of the Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands since May 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subscribe to Open</span> Open access academic publishing model

Subscribe to Open (S2O) is an economic model used by peer-reviewed scholarly journals to provide readers with open access (OA) to the journal’s content, without charging costs to authors. S2O converts journals that have a traditional subscription model to open access.

References

  1. ↑ "Coalition of European Funders Announces 'Plan S' to Require Full OA, Cap APCs, & Disallow Publication in Hybrid Journals". SPARC. 4 September 2018. Archived from the original on 16 January 2019. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
  2. ↑ "Plan S: Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications" (PDF). Science Europe . 4 September 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2018. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
  3. 1 2 "Science Europe – cOAlition S". scienceeurope.org. Archived from the original on 5 October 2018. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
  4. ↑ "European countries demand that publicly funded research should be free to all". The Economist . 15 September 2018. Archived from the original on 2 October 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
  5. ↑ Biemans, Claud (March 2019). "Hobbels op weg naar open wetenschap". Nederlands Tijschrift voor Natuurkunde (in Dutch). Archived from the original on 25 February 2019. Retrieved 25 February 2019. De S staat voor shock. (Robbert-Jan Smits, presentation at the Physics@Veldhoven conference, 22 January 2019).
  6. ↑ Brainard, Jeffrey (1 January 2021). "A new mandate highlights costs, benefits of making all scientific articles free to read". Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). doi:10.1126/science.abg3557. ISSN   0036-8075. S2CID   234138307.
  7. ↑ "cOAlition S statement on Open Access for academic books". Plan S. 2 September 2021. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
  8. ↑ Sanderson, Katharine (14 November 2023). "Who should pay for open-access publishing? APC alternatives emerge". Nature. 623 (7987). Nature Publishing Group: 472–473. Bibcode:2023Natur.623..472S. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-03506-4. PMID   37964063. S2CID   265152169 . Retrieved 23 November 2023.
  9. ↑ "Towards Responsible Publishing". 'Plan S' and 'cOAlition S' – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications. Retrieved 23 November 2023.
  10. 1 2 3 "Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S" (PDF). cOAlition S. 27 November 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 February 2020. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  11. ↑ "cOAlition S Adopts Implementation Guidance on Plan S". cOAlition S. 22 November 2018. Archived from the original on 21 November 2020. Retrieved 22 November 2018.
  12. 1 2 Else, Holly (27 November 2018). "Funders flesh out details of Europe's bold open-access plan". Nature. Archived from the original on 5 November 2020. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  13. ↑ Van Noorden, Richard (16 July 2020). "Open-access Plan S to allow publishing in any journal". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02134-6. PMID   32678332. S2CID   220610171. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  14. ↑ ARL Welcomes cOAlitionS Retention Strategy Calling for Open Access to Results of Funded Research, US: Association of Research Libraries, 15 July 2020, archived from the original on 26 October 2020, retrieved 15 July 2020
  15. 1 2 Mounce, Ross (5 October 2021). "Observing the success so far of the Rights Retention Strategy". Plan S. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
  16. ↑ "Public Feedback on the Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S". cOAlition S. 27 November 2018. Archived from the original on 8 December 2018. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  17. ↑ "cOAlition S Releases Revised Implementation Guidance on Plan S Following Public Feedback Exercise | Plan S". www.coalition-s.org. Archived from the original on 30 May 2019. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
  18. ↑ Rabes, Tania (2 January 2019). "Will the world embrace Plan S, the radical proposal to mandate open access to science papers?". Science. Archived from the original on 3 January 2019. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  19. 1 2 "National Research Funding Organisations Participating in cOAlition S" (PDF). Science Europe. 9 October 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2019. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  20. ↑ "NHMRC's revised Open Access Policy released". 19 September 2022.
  21. ↑ Else, Holly (28 September 2018). "Finland joins Europe's bold open-access push". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06895-z. S2CID   158296679.
  22. ↑ "The Fonds de recherche du Québec support open science by joining cOAlition S". frq.gouv.qc.ca. June 2021. Archived from the original on 1 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  23. ↑ "Portugal's national funding agency for science, research and technology joins cOAlition S". www.coalition-s.org. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
  24. ↑ "SAMRC - making open access to research publications a reality". www.samrc.ac.za. Archived from the original on 31 January 2021. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
  25. ↑ "Vinnova, Sweden's Innovation Agency, Joins cOAlition S". cOAlition S. 22 May 2019. Archived from the original on 7 November 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
  26. ↑ "SNSF joins cOAlition S – immediate Open Access to scientific articles". 1 June 2022.
  27. 1 2 Craig Nicholson (12 February 2019). "India agrees to sign up to Plan S". researchresearch.com. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 12 February 2019.
  28. ↑ Mohammad (13 March 2019). "The Higher Council for Science and Technology is the first organisation in the Middle East who joined cOAlition PLAN S". hcst.gov.jo. Archived from the original on 25 March 2019. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  29. ↑ "The Higher Council for Science and Technology Joins cOAlition S | Plan S". www.coalition-s.org. Archived from the original on 26 March 2019. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  30. 1 2 Noorden, Richard Van (5 November 2018). "Wellcome and Gates join bold European open-access plan". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07300-5. Archived from the original on 16 November 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
  31. ↑ Moody, Glyn (6 November 2018). "Big Boost For Open Access As Wellcome And Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Back EU's 'Plan S'". Techdirt. Archived from the original on 8 November 2018. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
  32. ↑ Brainard, Jeffrey (1 October 2020). "HHMI, one of the largest research philanthropies, will require immediate open access to papers". Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). doi:10.1126/science.abf0595. ISSN   0036-8075. S2CID   224876749.
  33. ↑ Else, Holly (1 October 2020). "Powerful US research funder unveils strict open-access policy". Nature. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02793-5. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   33005051. S2CID   222159534.
  34. ↑ "The Howard Hughes Medical Institute joins cOAlition S - Plan S". 'Plan S' and 'cOAlition S' – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications. 1 October 2020. Archived from the original on 2 October 2020. Retrieved 5 October 2020.
  35. ↑ "HHMI Announces Open Access Publishing Policy". HHMI.org. Archived from the original on 3 October 2020. Retrieved 5 October 2020.
  36. ↑ "The Templeton World Charity Foundation joins cOAlition S | Plan S". www.coalition-s.org. Archived from the original on 27 November 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2021.
  37. ↑ "Plan S". cOAlition S Welcomes its First African Member and Receives Strong Support from the African Academy of Sciences. Archived from the original on 20 February 2019. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  38. ↑ "Aligning Science Against Parkinson's (ASAP) Joins cOAlition S | Plan S". www.coalition-s.org. Archived from the original on 26 September 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  39. ↑ Schekman, Randy; Riley, Ekemini AU (25 September 2019). "Coordinating a new approach to basic research into Parkinson's disease". eLife. 8. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51167 . PMC   6760967 . PMID   31551111.
  40. ↑ "'Plan S' and 'cOAlition S' – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications – European Commission". European Commission. 4 September 2018. Archived from the original on 4 September 2018. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
  41. ↑ "WHO and TDR join coalition for free digital access to health research". WHO. Archived from the original on 14 January 2020. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
  42. ↑ "Departure of Special Envoy for Open Access and Plan S Architect, Robert-Jan Smits". Plan S. 7 February 2019. Archived from the original on 4 March 2019. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  43. ↑ Smits, Robert-Jan; Pells, Rachael (27 January 2022). Plan S for Shock: Science. Shock. Solution. Speed. Ubiquity Press. doi: 10.5334/bcq . ISBN   978-1-914481-16-1. S2CID   246369795.
  44. ↑ "cOAlition S Appoints Johan Rooryck as Open Access Champion". Plan S. Archived from the original on 28 August 2019. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  45. ↑ Droegemeier, Kelvin (30 April 2019). "An Interview with OSTP Director Kelvin Droegemeier" (in Dutch). American Institute of Physics. Archived from the original on 12 October 2020. Retrieved 2 May 2019. 'One of the things this government will not do is to tell researchers where they have to publish their papers. That is absolutely up to the scholar who's doing the publication. There's just no question about that.'
  46. ↑ Noorden (9 November 2018). "RJ ansluter sig till Plan S" (in Swedish). Archived from the original on 6 August 2020. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
  47. ↑ "Riksbankens Jubileumsfond steps away from Plan S". www.rj.se. Archived from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  48. ↑ "India Will Skip Plan S, Focus on National Efforts in Science Publishing". 26 October 2019. Archived from the original on 27 October 2019. Retrieved 20 November 2019.
  49. ↑ "ERC Scientific Council joins new effort to push for full open access". ERC: European Research Council. 3 September 2018. Archived from the original on 23 December 2020. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
  50. ↑ "ERC Scientific Council calls for open access plans to respect researchers' needs". ERC: European Research Council. 20 July 2020. Archived from the original on 20 July 2020. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  51. ↑ "Supporting Plan S, a model making research accessible & advancing science globally" . Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  52. ↑ "Systemic reforms and further consultation needed to make Plan S a success". 12 December 2018. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  53. 1 2 3 4 Roussi, Antoaneta (5 December 2018). "China backs Plan S". researchresearch.com. Archived from the original on 2 October 2021. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  54. ↑ Schiermeier, Quirin (5 December 2018). "China backs bold plan to tear down journal paywalls". Nature . Archived from the original on 6 December 2018. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  55. ↑ "COAR's response to Plan S". 12 September 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  56. ↑ "Building a Sustainable Knowledge Commons. COAR's response to the draft implementation requirements in Plan S". 13 December 2018. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  57. ↑ "Joint statement by CAUL/AOASG on Plan S". CAUL. 11 February 2019. Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
  58. 1 2 "Towards a Plan(HS)S: DARIAH's position on PlanS". DARIAH-EU. 25 September 2018. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 28 October 2018.
  59. ↑ "Stellungnahme der DFG zur Gründung von "cOAlition S" zur Unterstützung von Open Access". Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (in German). 4 September 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  60. ↑ "EULIFE reacts to Plan S: Support to Open Access and 10 key recommendations". EU-Life. 12 November 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  61. 1 2 3 "Joint Statement on Open Access for Researchers via Plan S" (PDF). Researchers Support Open Access via Plan S. September 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
  62. ↑ "Response to Science Europe's Open Access plan". EMBO. September 2018. Archived from the original on 7 January 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  63. ↑ "Publications". eua.eu. Archived from the original on 8 December 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  64. ↑ "F1000 supports EC's plan for full and immediate open access (Plan S)". 4 September 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  65. ↑ "The Fair Open Access Alliance (FOAA) on Plan S". 19 September 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  66. ↑ "FOAA Board recommendations for the implementation of Plan S" (PDF). Fair Open Access Alliance (FOAA). 19 October 2018. Archived from the original on 19 October 2018. Retrieved 28 October 2018.
  67. ↑ "Portugal and FCT'S position towards Plan S". Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). 2 October 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  68. ↑ "Final Statement of the 14th Berlin Open Access Conference". 4 December 2018. Archived from the original on 7 December 2018. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  69. ↑ "Expression of interest in the large-scale implementation of Open Access to scholarly journals". 4 December 2018. Archived from the original on 7 December 2018. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  70. ↑ "Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications: LERU's reaction to Plan S". LERU. Archived from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  71. ↑ "LIBER Supports New Plan to Make Open Access A Reality By 2020". LIBER. 4 September 2018. Archived from the original on 1 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  72. ↑ "NIHR gives support to international Open Access initiative". 17 January 2019. Archived from the original on 19 January 2019. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  73. ↑ "Internationale coalitie wil versnelling Open Access". ZoneMw (in Dutch). 4 September 2018. Archived from the original on 9 September 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  74. ↑ "OASPA Offers Support on the Implementation of Plan S". 2 October 2018. Archived from the original on 2 October 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  75. ↑ "Plan S: A European Open Access Mandate". 5 October 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  76. ↑ "New coalition of European funders join together to place unprecedented mandate on researchers to publish OA". 5 September 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  77. ↑ "The transfer to open access should take place as soon as it is possible". Swedish Research Council . 4 September 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  78. ↑ "PRESS RELEASE: Researchers Support Open Access via Plan S | Eurodoc". eurodoc.net. Archived from the original on 24 September 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  79. ↑ "YERUN Position Statement on Plan". Young European Research Universities Network . 18 October 2018. Archived from the original on 20 October 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  80. ↑ "Towards a Plan(HS)S: DARIAH's position on PlanS. Recommendations" (PDF). DARIAH-EU. 25 September 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 28 October 2018.
  81. ↑ "Members and Cooperating Partners". DARIAH-EU. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 1 January 2019.
  82. ↑ "Open Access by 2020: EUA supports Plan S for an open scholarly system". European University Association. 7 September 2018. Archived from the original on 16 November 2018. Retrieved 16 November 2018.
  83. ↑ "OA2020 Mainland China Signatory Libraries responded to Plan S Guidance on Implementation". 26 March 2019. Archived from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 15 April 2019.
  84. ↑ Open Letter from Undersigned Researchers. Reaction of Researchers to Plan S: Too Far, Too Risky Archived 8 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved 15 November 2018.
  85. ↑ Open Letter in Support of Funder Open Publishing Mandates Archived 5 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved 1 January 2019.
  86. ↑ Van Noorden, Richard (4 December 2018). "Researchers sign petition backing plans to end paywalls". Nature . Archived from the original on 7 December 2018. Retrieved 4 December 2018.
  87. 1 2 3 Else, Holly (September 2018). "Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions". Nature . 561 (7721): 17–18. Bibcode:2018Natur.561...17E. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06178-7 . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   30181639.
  88. 1 2 Yeager, Ashley (4 September 2018). "Open-Access Plan in Europe Bans Publishing in Paywalled Journals". The Scientist . Archived from the original on 15 September 2018. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
  89. 1 2 Monbiot, George (13 September 2018). "Scientific publishing is a rip-off. We fund the research – it should be free". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 13 September 2018. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
  90. ↑ McCallum, M.L. (2019). "RE: Scientific societies worry about threat from Plan S". Science. 372 (3): 332–333. Bibcode:2019Sci...363..332B. doi:10.1126/science.363.6425.332. PMID   30679353. S2CID   59251411.
  91. ↑ Eglen, Stephen J (27 March 2021). "Primer on the Rights Retention Strategy". doi:10.5281/zenodo.4641799. S2CID   244968062.
  92. ↑ Kamerlin, Shina Caroline Lynn (5 October 2020). "Open Access, Plan S, and researchers' needs". EMBO Reports. 21 (10): e51568. doi:10.15252/embr.202051568. ISSN   1469-221X. PMC   7534613 . PMID   32896098.
  93. ↑ Khoo, Shaun Yon-Seng (6 October 2021). "The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution". Insights. 34 (1): 22. doi: 10.1629/uksg.556 . hdl: 1866/25762 . ISSN   2048-7754. S2CID   241975805.
  94. ↑ Vuong, Q.-H. (2020). "Plan S, self-publishing, and addressing unreasonable risks of society publishing". Learned Publishing. 33 (1): 64–68. doi: 10.1002/leap.1274 .
  95. ↑ Keulemans, Maarten (4 September 2018). "11 EU-landen besluiten: vanaf 2020 moet alle wetenschappelijke literatuur gratis beschikbaar zijn". De Volkskrank (in Dutch). Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018. Als je vindt dat informatie gratis moet zijn: ga naar Wikipedia.
  96. ↑ Elder, Bryce (12 September 2018). "Stocks to watch: SSE, BAT, Galápagos, RELX, Telefónica, RBS". Financial Times . Archived from the original on 14 October 2018. Retrieved 14 October 2018.
  97. ↑ Smith, Richard (6–12 October 2018). "Film. The business of academic publishing: "a catastrophe"". The Lancet . 392 (10152): 1186–1187. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32353-5. PMID   30712703. S2CID   54405007.
  98. ↑ "OASPA Feedback on Plan S Implementation Guidance". OASPA. 8 February 2019. Archived from the original on 26 October 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
  99. ↑ Norman, Noah (2 December 2018). "Epidemiology & Infection goes open access". Epidemiology and Infection . Vol. 147. doi:10.1017/S0950268818003047.
  100. ↑ Van Noorden, Richard (9 April 2020). "Nature to join open-access Plan S, publisher says". Nature. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-01066-5. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   32273623. S2CID   215725652.
  101. ↑ Else, Holly (24 November 2020). "Nature journals reveal terms of landmark open-access option". Nature. 588 (7836): 19–20. Bibcode:2020Natur.588...19E. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03324-y. PMID   33235382. S2CID   227166081. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 24 November 2020.
  102. ↑ Van Noorden, Richard (15 January 2021). "Science family of journals announces change to open-access policy". Nature. 589 (7843). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 505. Bibcode:2021Natur.589..505V. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00103-1 . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   33452512.
  103. ↑ Else, Holly (8 April 2021). "A guide to Plan S: the open-access initiative shaking up science publishing". Nature. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00883-6. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   33833458. S2CID   233191526.
  104. ↑ "Continuing the open access transition in 2021 and beyond - Advancing Discovery". Springer Nature. 8 April 2021. Archived from the original on 9 April 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
  105. ↑ Lenharo, Mariana (4 April 2024). "Will the Gates Foundation's preprint-centric policy help open access?". Nature. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/d41586-024-00996-8. PMID   38575826 . Retrieved 6 April 2024.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.