Open Energy Modelling Initiative

Last updated

Open Energy Modelling Initiative
Abbreviationopenmod
FormationSeptember 2014(9 years ago) (2014-09)  [lower-alpha 1]
TypeInternet-based with periodic workshops
PurposePromote open-source energy models and open energy sector data
Official language
English
Website openmod-initiative.org
Wiki wiki.openmod-initiative.org
Forum forum.openmod.org
Email list groups.google.com/g/openmod-initiative
YouTube channel www.youtube.com/@openmod-initiative/videos

The Open Energy Modelling Initiative (openmod) is a grassroots community of energy system modellers from universities and research institutes across Europe and elsewhere. The initiative promotes the use of open-source software and open data in energy system modelling for research and policy advice. The Open Energy Modelling Initiative documents a variety of open-source energy models and addresses practical and conceptual issues regarding their development and application. The initiative runs an email list, an internet forum, and a wiki and hosts occasional academic workshops. A statement of aims is available. [1]

Contents

Context

The application of open-source development to energy modelling dates back to around 2003. This section provides some background for the growing interest in open methods.

Growth in open energy modelling

Just two active open energy modelling projects were cited in a 2011 paper: OSeMOSYS and TEMOA. [2] : 5861  Balmorel was also public at that time, having been made available on a website in 2001. [lower-alpha 2] As of November 2016, the openmod wiki lists 24 such undertakings. [3] As of October 2021, the Open Energy Platform lists 17 open energy frameworks and about 50 open energy models.

Academic literature

This 2012 paper presents the case for using "open, publicly accessible software and data as well as crowdsourcing techniques to develop robust energy analysis tools". [4] : 149  The paper claims that these techniques can produce high-quality results and are particularly relevant for developing countries.

There is an increasing call for the energy models and datasets used for energy policy analysis and advice to be made public in the interests of transparency and quality. [5] A 2010 paper concerning energy efficiency modeling argues that "an open peer review process can greatly support model verification and validation, which are essential for model development". [6] : 17  [7] One 2012 study argues that the source code and datasets used in such models should be placed under publicly accessible version control to enable third-parties to run and check specific models. [8] Another 2014 study argues that the public trust needed to underpin a rapid transition in energy systems can only be built through the use of transparent open-source energy models. [9] The UK TIMES project (UKTM) is open source, according to a 2014 presentation, because "energy modelling must be replicable and verifiable to be considered part of the scientific process" and because this fits with the "drive towards clarity and quality assurance in the provision of policy insights". [10] : 8  In 2016, the Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP) is seeking to improve its modelling methodologies, a key motivation being "the intertwined goals of transparency, communicability and policy credibility." [11] : S27  A 2016 paper argues that model-based energy scenario studies, wishing to influence decision-makers in government and industry, must become more comprehensible and more transparent. To these ends, the paper provides a checklist of transparency criteria that should be completed by modelers. The authors note however that they "consider open source approaches to be an extreme case of transparency that does not automatically facilitate the comprehensibility of studies for policy advice." [12] : 4  An editorial from 2016 opines that closed energy models providing public policy support "are inconsistent with the open access movement [and] publically[ sic ] funded research". [13] : 2  A 2017 paper lists the benefits of open data and models and the reasons that many projects nonetheless remain closed. The paper makes a number of recommendations for projects wishing to transition to a more open approach. The authors also conclude that, in terms of openness, energy research has lagged behind other fields, most notably physics, biotechnology, and medicine. [14] Moreover:

Given the importance of rapid global coordinated action on climate mitigation and the clear benefits of shared research efforts and transparently reproducible policy analysis, openness in energy research should not be for the sake of having some code or data available on a website, but as an initial step towards fundamentally better ways to both conduct our research and engage decision-makers with [our] models and the assumptions embedded within them. [14] : 214 

A one-page opinion piece in Nature News from 2017 advances the case for using open energy data and modeling to build public trust in policy analysis. The article also argues that scientific journals have a responsibility to require that data and code be submitted alongside text for scrutiny, currently only Energy Economics makes this practice mandatory within the energy domain. [15]

Diagram depicting an open analysis workflow prepared by Stefen Pfenninger for the first Open Energy Modelling Initiative meeting in Berlin, Germany held 18-19 September 2014 Openmod workflow diagram raster version.png
Diagram depicting an open analysis workflow prepared by Stefen Pfenninger for the first Open Energy Modelling Initiative meeting in Berlin, Germany held 18–19 September 2014

Issues surrounding copyright remain at the forefront with regard to open energy data. Most energy datasets are collated and published by official or semi-official sources, for example, national statistics offices, transmission system operators, and electricity market operators. The doctrine of open data requires that these datasets be available under free licenses (such as CC BY 4.0) or be in the public domain. But most published energy datasets carry proprietary licenses, limiting their reuse in numerical and statistical models, open or otherwise. Measures to enforce market transparency have not helped because the associated information is normally licensed to preclude downstream usage. Recent transparency measures include the 2013 European energy market transparency regulation 543/2013  [16] and a 2016 amendment to the German Energy Industry Act  [17] to establish a nation energy information platform, slated to launch on 1 July 2017. Energy databases may also be protected under general database law, irrespective of the copyright status of the information they hold. [18]

In December 2017, participants from the Open Energy Modelling Initiative and allied research communities made a written submission to the European Commission on the re-use of public sector information. [19] The document provides a comprehensive account of the data issues faced by researchers engaged in open energy system modeling and energy market analysis and quoted extensively from a German legal opinion. [20]

In May 2020, participants from the Open Energy Modelling Initiative made a further submission on the European strategy for data. [21] [22] In mid‑2021, participants made two written submissions on a proposed Data Act — legislative work-in-progress intended primarily to improve public interest business-to-government (B2G) information transfers within the European Economic Area (EEA). [23] [24] More specifically, the two Data Act submissions drew attention to restrictive but nonetheless compliant public disclosure reporting practices deployed by the European Energy Exchange (EEX).

Public policy support

In May 2016, the European Union announced that "all scientific articles in Europe must be freely accessible as of 2020". [25] This is a step in the right direction, but the new policy makes no mention of open software and its importance to the scientific process. [26] In August 2016, the United States government announced a new federal source code policy which mandates that at least 20% of custom source code developed by or for any agency of the federal government be released as open-source software (OSS). [27] The US Department of Energy (DOE) is participating in the program. The project is hosted on a dedicated website and subject to a three-year pilot. [27] [28] Open-source campaigners are using the initiative to advocate that European governments adopt similar practices. [29] In 2017 the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) issued a position paper calling for free software and open standards to be central to European science funding, including the flagship EU program Horizon 2020. The position paper focuses on open data and open data processing and the question of open modeling is not traversed per se. [30]

Adoption by regulators and industry generally

A trend evident by 2023 is the adoption of regulators within the European Union and North America. Fairley (2023), writing in the IEEE Spectrum publication, provides an overview. [31] And as one example, the Canada Energy Regulator is using the PyPSA framework for systems analysis. [32]

Workshops

The Open Energy Modelling Initiative participants take turns to host regular academic workshops.

Regular workshops
 DateHostCityCountryComment
118–19 September 2014 DIW Berlin   [33] BerlinGermanyestablishment meeting with 28 participants  [33]
213–14 April 2015 MCC Berlin   [34] BerlinGermany
310–11 September 2015 Imperial College London (ICL)  [35] LondonUnited Kingdomin association with Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
428–29 April 2016 KTH Royal Institute of Technology   [36] StockholmSweden
527–28 October 2016 Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano MilanItaly Archived 12 July 2016 at the Wayback Machine
620–21 April 2017 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS)  [37] FrankfurtGermany
712–13 October 2017 Technical University of Munich (TUM)MunichGermany
86–8 June 2018 Climate Policy Group, ETH Zurich ZürichSwitzerland63 attendees
922–24 May 2019 Department of Engineering, Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
1018–19 September 2019 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Golden, Colorado United States
1115–17 January 2020 Hertie School BerlinGermanycirca 190 attendees
12March thru May 2020 2020 mini‑workshop series online—during COVID-19 pandemic, 3 events for 2020
145 May 2021 2021 mini‑workshop online—during COVID-19 pandemic
1517 February 2022 2022 mini‑workshop online—during COVID-19 pandemic
1622–24 March 2023 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg, Vienna Austrialimited to 65 attendees
1713–14 November 2023 Stanford University Campus San Francisco Bay Area United Stateslimited to 80 attendees
1826–28 March 2024CRESYM and OTE Grenoble Francelimited to 100 attendees

The Open Energy Modelling Initiative also holds occasional specialist meetings.

Specialist meetings
 DateSubjectCityCountryComment
134 December 2020 Climate forecasting for energy workshop online—joint organization with S2S4E project

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ The first workshop was held on 18–19 September 2014 and the first posting to the openmod mailing list occurred on 4 October 2014.
  2. ↑ NEMO was also under development in 2011 but it is unclear whether its codebase was public at that point.

Further reading

Related to openmod

Open energy data

Similar initiatives

Other

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geographic information system</span> System to capture, manage and present geographic data

A geographic information system (GIS) consists of integrated computer hardware and software that store, manage, analyze, edit, output, and visualize geographic data. Much of this often happens within a spatial database, however, this is not essential to meet the definition of a GIS. In a broader sense, one may consider such a system also to include human users and support staff, procedures and workflows, the body of knowledge of relevant concepts and methods, and institutional organizations.

As an ethic that spans science, engineering, business, and the humanities, transparency is operating in such a way that it is easy for others to see what actions are performed. Transparency implies openness, communication, and accountability.

The Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) is a standards developing organization (SDO) dealing with medical research data linked with healthcare, to "enable information system interoperability to improve medical research and related areas of healthcare". The standards support medical research from protocol through analysis and reporting of results and have been shown to decrease resources needed by 60% overall and 70–90% in the start-up stages when they are implemented at the beginning of the research process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open science</span> Generally available scientific research

Open science is the movement to make scientific research and its dissemination accessible to all levels of society, amateur or professional. Open science is transparent and accessible knowledge that is shared and developed through collaborative networks. It encompasses practices such as publishing open research, campaigning for open access, encouraging scientists to practice open-notebook science, broader dissemination and engagement in science and generally making it easier to publish, access and communicate scientific knowledge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open data</span> Openly accessible data

Open data is data that is openly accessible, exploitable, editable and shared by anyone for any purpose. Open data is licensed under an open license.

Open government is the governing doctrine which maintains that citizens have the right to access the documents and proceedings of the government to allow for effective public oversight. In its broadest construction, it opposes reason of state and other considerations which have tended to legitimize extensive state secrecy. The origins of open-government arguments can be dated to the time of the European Age of Enlightenment, when philosophers debated the proper construction of a then nascent democratic society. It is also increasingly being associated with the concept of democratic reform. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16 for example advocates for public access to information as a criterion for ensuring accountable and inclusive institutions.

Research data archiving is the long-term storage of scholarly research data, including the natural sciences, social sciences, and life sciences. The various academic journals have differing policies regarding how much of their data and methods researchers are required to store in a public archive, and what is actually archived varies widely between different disciplines. Similarly, the major grant-giving institutions have varying attitudes towards public archival of data. In general, the tradition of science has been for publications to contain sufficient information to allow fellow researchers to replicate and therefore test the research. In recent years this approach has become increasingly strained as research in some areas depends on large datasets which cannot easily be replicated independently.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Data sharing</span>

Data sharing is the practice of making data used for scholarly research available to other investigators. Many funding agencies, institutions, and publication venues have policies regarding data sharing because transparency and openness are considered by many to be part of the scientific method.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global Carbon Project</span>

The Global Carbon Project (GCP) is an organisation that seeks to quantify global greenhouse gas emissions and their causes. Established in 2001, its projects include global budgets for three dominant greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide —and complementary efforts in urban, regional, cumulative, and negative emissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renaissance Computing Institute</span>

Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI) was launched in 2004 as a collaboration involving the State of North Carolina, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), Duke University, and North Carolina State University. RENCI is organizationally structured as a research institute within UNC-CH, and its main campus is located in Chapel Hill, NC, a few miles from the UNC-CH campus. RENCI has engagement centers at UNC-CH, Duke University (Durham), and North Carolina State University (Raleigh).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galaxy (computational biology)</span>

Galaxy is a scientific workflow, data integration, and data and analysis persistence and publishing platform that aims to make computational biology accessible to research scientists that do not have computer programming or systems administration experience. Although it was initially developed for genomics research, it is largely domain agnostic and is now used as a general bioinformatics workflow management system.

Open scientific data or open research data is a type of open data focused on publishing observations and results of scientific activities available for anyone to analyze and reuse. A major purpose of the drive for open data is to allow the verification of scientific claims, by allowing others to look at the reproducibility of results, and to allow data from many sources to be integrated to give new knowledge.

Privacy by design is an approach to systems engineering initially developed by Ann Cavoukian and formalized in a joint report on privacy-enhancing technologies by a joint team of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (Canada), the Dutch Data Protection Authority, and the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research in 1995. The privacy by design framework was published in 2009 and adopted by the International Assembly of Privacy Commissioners and Data Protection Authorities in 2010. Privacy by design calls for privacy to be taken into account throughout the whole engineering process. The concept is an example of value sensitive design, i.e., taking human values into account in a well-defined manner throughout the process.

Open energy system models are energy system models that are open source. However, some of them may use third party proprietary software as part of their workflows to input, process, or output data. Preferably, these models use open data, which facilitates open science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pyomo</span>

Pyomo is a collection of Python software packages for formulating optimization models.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zenodo</span> Research data repository

Zenodo is a general-purpose open repository developed under the European OpenAIRE program and operated by CERN. It allows researchers to deposit research papers, data sets, research software, reports, and any other research related digital artefacts. For each submission, a persistent digital object identifier (DOI) is minted, which makes the stored items easily citeable.

Energy modeling or energy system modeling is the process of building computer models of energy systems in order to analyze them. Such models often employ scenario analysis to investigate different assumptions about the technical and economic conditions at play. Outputs may include the system feasibility, greenhouse gas emissions, cumulative financial costs, natural resource use, and energy efficiency of the system under investigation. A wide range of techniques are employed, ranging from broadly economic to broadly engineering. Mathematical optimization is often used to determine the least-cost in some sense. Models can be international, regional, national, municipal, or stand-alone in scope. Governments maintain national energy models for energy policy development.

Open energy system database projects employ open data methods to collect, clean, and republish energy-related datasets for open use. The resulting information is then available, given a suitable open license, for statistical analysis and for building numerical energy system models, including open energy system models. Permissive licenses like Creative Commons CC0 and CC BY are preferred, but some projects will house data made public under market transparency regulations and carrying unqualified copyright.

The cTuning Foundation is a global non-profit organization developing a common methodology and open-source tools to support sustainable, collaborative and reproducible research in Computer science and organize and automate artifact evaluation and reproducibility inititiaves at machine learning and systems conferences and journals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FAIR data</span> Data compliant with the terms of the FAIR Data Principles

FAIR data are data which meet principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR). The acronym and principles were defined in a March 2016 paper in the journal Scientific Data by a consortium of scientists and organizations.

References

  1. ↑ "openmod — Open Energy Modelling Initiative". Open Energy Modelling Initiative. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
  2. ↑ Howells, Mark; Rogner, Holger; Strachan, Neil; Heaps, Charles; Huntington, Hillard; Kypreos, Socrates; Hughes, Alison; Silveira, Semida; DeCarolis, Joe; Bazilian, Morgan; Roehrl, Alexander (2011). "OSeMOSYS: the open source energy modeling system : an introduction to its ethos, structure and development". Energy Policy. 39 (10): 5850–5870. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.033. The misspelling of Morgan Bazillian has been corrected in this citation. ResearchGate version.
  3. ↑ "Open Models". Open Energy Modelling Initiative. Retrieved 3 November 2016.
  4. ↑ Bazilian, Morgan; Rice, Andrew; Rotich, Juliana; Howells, Mark; DeCarolis, Joseph; Macmillan, Stuart; Brooks, Cameron; Bauer, Florian; Liebreich, Michael (2012). "Open source software and crowdsourcing for energy analysis" (PDF). Energy Policy. 49: 149–153. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.032 . Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  5. ↑ acatech; Lepoldina; Akademienunion, eds. (2016). Consulting with energy scenarios: requirements for scientific policy advice (PDF). Berlin, Germany: acatech — National Academy of Science and Engineering. ISBN   978-3-8047-3550-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  6. ↑ Mundaca, Luis; Neij, Lena; Worrell, Ernst; McNeil, Michael A (1 August 2010). "Evaluating energy efficiency policies with energy-economy models — Report number LBNL-3862E". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 35: 305–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-052810-164840 . OSTI   1001644 . Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  7. ↑ Mundaca, Luis; Neij, Lena; Worrell, Ernst; McNeil, Michael A (22 October 2010). "Evaluating energy efficiency policies with energy-economy models". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 35 (1): 305–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-052810-164840 . ISSN   1543-5938.
  8. ↑ DeCarolis, Joseph F; Hunter, Kevin; Sreepathi, Sarat (2012). "The case for repeatable analysis with energy economy optimization models" (PDF). Energy Economics. 34 (6): 1845–1853. arXiv: 2001.10858 . doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.004. ISSN   0140-9883. S2CID   59143900. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 April 2016. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  9. ↑ Wiese, Frauke; Bökenkamp, Gesine; Wingenbach, Clemens; Hohmeyer, Olav (2014). "An open source energy system simulation model as an instrument for public participation in the development of strategies for a sustainable future". Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment. 3 (5): 490–504. doi:10.1002/wene.109. ISSN   2041-840X. S2CID   108676376.
  10. ↑ Strachan, Neil; Fais, Birgit; Daly, Hannah (18 November 2014). Redefining the energy modelling-policy interface: developing a fully open source UK TIMES model — Presentation (PDF). Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme (ETSAP) Workshop, Technical University of Denmark (DTU). Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  11. ↑ Pye, Steve; Bataille, Chris (2016). "Improving deep decarbonization modelling capacity for developed and developing country contexts". Climate Policy. 16 (S1): S27–S46. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1173004. S2CID   76657283.
  12. ↑ Cao, Karl-Kiên; Cebulla, Felix; Gómez Vilchez, Jonatan J; Mousavi, Babak; Prehofer, Sigrid (28 September 2016). "Raising awareness in model-based energy scenario studies — a transparency checklist". Energy, Sustainability and Society. 6 (1): 28–47. doi: 10.1186/s13705-016-0090-z . ISSN   2192-0567. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  13. ↑ Strachan, Neil; Fais, Birgit; Daly, Hannah (29 February 2016). "Reinventing the energy modelling–policy interface". Nature Energy. 1 (3): 16012. Bibcode:2016NatEn...116012S. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.12. ISSN   2058-7546. S2CID   111422286.
  14. 1 2 Pfenninger, Stefan; DeCarolis, Joseph; Hirth, Lion; Quoilin, Sylvain; Staffell, Iain (February 2017). "The importance of open data and software: is energy research lagging behind?". Energy Policy. 101: 211–215. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.046 . hdl: 10044/1/56796 . ISSN   0301-4215.
  15. ↑ Pfenninger, Stefan (23 February 2017). "Energy scientists must show their workings" (PDF). Nature News. 542 (7642): 393. Bibcode:2017Natur.542..393P. doi:10.1038/542393a. PMID   28230147. S2CID   4449502 . Retrieved 26 February 2017.
  16. ↑ "Commission Regulation (EU) No 543/2013 of 14 June 2013 on submission and publication of data in electricity markets and amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council". Official Journal of the European Union (L 163): 1–12. 15 June 2013. Retrieved 1 December 2016.
  17. ↑ § 111d Energiewirtschaftsgesetz(EnWG)[Energy Industry Act]of 13 October 2016. p. 115–116. Einrichtung einer nationalen Informationsplattform [Establishment of a national information platform].
  18. ↑ Boecker, Lina (21 November 2016). Energy databases: protection and licensing (PDF). Berlin, Germany: JBB Rechtsanwaelte.
  19. ↑ Morrison, Robbie; Brown, Tom; De Felice, Matteo (10 December 2017). Submission on the re-use of public sector information: with an emphasis on energy system datasets — Release 09 (PDF). Berlin, Germany. Retrieved 13 December 2017.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  20. ↑ Jaeger, Till (24 July 2017). Legal aspects of European electricity data — Legal opinion (PDF). Berlin, Germany: JBB Rechtsanwälte. Retrieved 13 October 2017.
  21. ↑ European Commission (19 February 2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: a European strategy for data — COM (2020) 66 final (PDF). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  22. ↑ Morrison, Robbie (30 May 2020). Morrison, Robbie (ed.). Submission on a European strategy for data with an emphasis on energy sector datasets — Release 08 (PDF). Berlin, Germany. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5534387 . Retrieved 8 June 2020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) Creative Commons CC‑BY‑4.0 license. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  23. ↑ Morrison, Robbie (25 June 2021). Morrison, Robbie (ed.). Submission on a proposed Data Act for the European Union from the perspective of energy system analysis — Release 07 (PDF). Berlin, Germany. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5032198 . Retrieved 28 September 2021.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) Creative Commons CC‑BY‑4.0 license. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  24. ↑ Morrison, Robbie (3 September 2021). Submission on a proposed Data Act for the European Union from the perspective of energy system analysis / 2 — Release 02 (PDF). Berlin, Germany. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5471077 . Retrieved 28 September 2021.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) Creative Commons CC‑BY‑4.0 license. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  25. ↑ Hendrikx, Michiel (27 May 2016). "All European scientific articles to be freely accessible by 2020" (PDF) (Press release). The Netherlands: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 August 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
  26. ↑ Albers, Erik (2 June 2016). "There is no open science without the use of open standards and free software". blog.3rik.cc. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
  27. 1 2 Scott, Tony; Rung, Anne E (8 August 2016). Federal Source Code Policy: Achieving Efficiency, Transparency, and Innovation through Reusable and Open Source Software — Memorandum for the Heads of Departments and Agencies — M-16-21 (PDF). Washington DC, USA: Office of Budget and Management, Executive Office of the President. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 January 2017. Retrieved 14 September 2016. Also available as HTML at: sourcecode.cio.gov
  28. ↑ "The People's Code: Unlock the tremendous potential of the Federal Government's software". Code.gov. USA. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
  29. ↑ New, William (22 August 2016). "New US government source code policy could provide model for Europe". Intellectual Property Watch. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved 14 September 2016.
  30. ↑ Gkotsopoulou, Olga; Albers, Erik; Di Cosmo, Roberto; Malaja, Polina; Sanjurjo, Fernando (5 January 2017). Position paper for the endorsement of free software and open standards in Horizon 2020 and all publicly-funded research (PDF). Berlin, Germany: Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE). Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  31. ↑ Fairley, Peter (27 June 2023). "EU: Climate-proof grids require more transparency > 'Black-box' US energy planning hinders renewable energy development". IEEE Spectrum. New York, USA. ISSN   0018-9235 . Retrieved 27 June 2023. Web feature.
  32. ↑ Canada Energy Regulator (19 June 2023). "CER — Appendix 3: Overview of the energy futures modeling system". Government of Canada. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  33. 1 2 Hirth, Lion (18 September 2014). Workshop zur offenen Energiesystemmodellierung [Open energy system modeling workshop](PDF) (in German). Berlin, Germany: Neon Neue Energieökonomik GmbH. Retrieved 23 February 2021. Date from PDF metadata. Workshop program.
  34. ↑ "OSeMOSYS Newsletter" . Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  35. ↑ "Open Energy Modelling Workshop" . Retrieved 25 September 2015.
  36. ↑ "Open Energy Modelling Workshop — KTH, Stockholm 2016" . Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  37. ↑ "Open Energy Modelling Workshop — Frankfurt 2017" . Retrieved 1 December 2016.
  38. ↑ Morrison, Robbie (20 November 2019). "An open energy system modeling community". Generation R Blog. Hannover, Germany: Leibniz Research Alliance Open Science. doi:10.25815/ff3b-d154. ISSN   2512-3815 . Retrieved 22 November 2019. Creative Commons CC‑BY‑4.0 license. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  39. ↑ Hilbers, Adriaan P (19 December 2020). Open energy system modelling for climate scientists and others. London, United Kingdom: Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London. Retrieved 19 December 2020. Video 00:11:42. Presentation to Climate forecasting for energy workshop on 4 December 2020. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  40. ↑ DeCarolis, Joe (24 December 2020). An Open Energy Outlook for the United States powered by TEMOA. Raleigh, North Carolina, USA: NC State University. Retrieved 26 February 2021. Duration 00:15:16. Creative Commons CC‑BY‑4.0 license. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  41. ↑ "Energiedaten für alle – Projekt "Open Power System Data" an der EUF gestartet" [Energy data for all — project "Open Power System Data" started at the EUF] (in German). Retrieved 25 September 2015.
  42. ↑ "Offene Plattform macht Energiedaten zugänglich" [Open platform makes energy data available] (in German). 14 September 2015. Retrieved 25 September 2015.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.