Sandwich | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1366–1885 | |
Seats | two |
Replaced by | Isle of Thanet |
Sandwich was a parliamentary constituency in Kent, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1366 until 1885, when it was disfranchised for corruption.
Sandwich like most of the other Cinque Ports, was first enfranchised in the 14th century. As a Cinque Port it was technically of different status from a parliamentary borough, but the difference was in most respects purely a nominal one. (The writ for election was directed to the Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, rather than the sheriff of the county, and its MPs were termed "barons" rather than "burgesses" as in boroughs.) Until 1832, the constituency consisted of the three parishes making up the town of Sandwich; it had once been a flourishing port but by the 19th century the harbour had silted up and there was only a limited maritime trade.
The right to vote was reserved to the freemen of the town, whether or not they were resident within the borough. In 1831 this amounted to 955 qualified voters, of whom only 320 lived in Sandwich. The freedom could be obtained by inheritance, by serving an apprenticeship, or by marrying the daughter or widow of a freeman; the corporation apparently did not, as in some boroughs, have the power to create unlimited numbers of honorary freemen so as to swamp the rights of the genuine freemen. At one period in the 17th century, the town corporation attempted to annex the right of voting to itself (as was the case in many other boroughs) on the grounds of "the avoidance of popular tumults common at elections", and in 1621 the Lord Warden ordered with the consent of the Privy Council that this should be so. However, the inhabitants of the town not only petitioned against the election result, but informed the Lord Warden that they intended to present a bill to Parliament to annul the result of that year's election and to restore their former privileges. In the event the petition against the election result was upheld and the election declared void, and a decision of the Commons in another dispute election, in 1690, confirmed that the right of voting was in the freemen.
For most of its existence, no single interest had a predominant influence in Sandwich so as to reduce it to a pocket borough, but the power of official patronage sometimes exerted some leverage. In Tudor times, the Lord Warden expected to be able to nominate one of the two MPs, but - unlike most of the other Cinque Ports - Sandwich consistently defied him, and made its own choice of both MPs throughout Queen Elizabeth's reign. In the 18th and 19th centuries, though, the influence of the navy (through the employment it provided) was sufficient that the Admiralty could be sure of choosing at least one MP at most elections. [1] Nevertheless, Sandwich fell short of being a true "Admiralty borough", and generally elected members who would benefit the town. (They were, however, no less venal than in other boroughs: the committee investigating a disputed election in 1695 was told that the elected member had promised that if after election he were to gain paid office he would give half his salary to the corporation, that he would contribute £20 a year for the poor of the town and a treat to the corporation on the anniversary of his election.)
In 1831, the population of the constituency was 3,084, and the town contained 610 houses. This would not have been sufficient for the borough to retain both its MPs under the Great Reform Act, but the boundaries were extended so as to include the neighbouring towns of Deal and Walmer, which quadrupled the population. Even so, and despite the extension of the franchise, the revised constituency had only 916 qualified voters for the 1832 general election.
At a by-election in 1880, evidence of widespread bribery in Sandwich emerged. Its writ was suspended, and a Royal Commission appointed to investigate. It was found that out of an electorate of 2115, 1850 voted, of whom 900 admitted they had been bribed and 100 admitted they had bribed. [2] As a result of its report, Sandwich was abolished as a constituency with effect from 25 June 1885, being incorporated into the Eastern Kent county division.
Notes
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Joseph Marryat (1790–1876) | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Samuel Grove Price | Unopposed | |||
Whig gain from Nonpartisan | |||||
Tory hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Joseph Marryat (1790–1876) | 498 | 41.8 | ||
Whig | Edward Troubridge | 397 | 33.3 | ||
Tory | Samuel Grove Price | 297 | 24.9 | ||
Majority | 100 | 8.4 | |||
Turnout | 700 | c. 75.3 | |||
Registered electors | c. 930 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig gain from Tory |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Joseph Marryat (1790–1876) | 495 | 30.8 | −11.0 | |
Whig | Edward Troubridge | 485 | 30.2 | −3.1 | |
Tory | Samuel Grove Price | 361 | 22.5 | +10.1 | |
Tory | Edward Owen | 265 | 16.5 | +4.1 | |
Majority | 124 | 7.7 | −0.7 | ||
Turnout | 847 | 92.5 | c. +17.2 | ||
Registered electors | 916 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | −9.1 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | −5.1 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Grove Price | 551 | 41.0 | +18.5 | |
Whig | Edward Troubridge | 405 | 30.1 | −30.9 | |
Conservative | Edward Owen | 389 | 28.9 | +12.4 | |
Turnout | 841 | 90.0 | −2.5 | ||
Registered electors | 934 | ||||
Majority | 66 | 10.9 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +17.0 | |||
Majority | 16 | 1.2 | −6.5 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −30.9 | |||
Troubridge was appointed a Lord Commissioner of the Admiralty, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Troubridge | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Troubridge | 416 | 27.4 | +12.4 | |
Whig | James Rivett-Carnac | 401 | 26.4 | +11.4 | |
Conservative | Samuel Grove Price | 370 | 24.4 | −16.6 | |
Conservative | Brook Bridges | 330 | 21.8 | −7.1 | |
Majority | 31 | 2.0 | +0.8 | ||
Turnout | 769 | 84.4 | −5.6 | ||
Registered electors | 911 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +12.1 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +11.6 | |||
Rivett-Carnac resigned after being appointed Governor of Bombay, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Rufane Shaw Donkin | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Donkin's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hugh Hamilton Lindsay | 406 | 53.0 | +6.8 | |
Whig | Charles Richard Fox [18] | 360 | 47.0 | −6.8 | |
Majority | 46 | 6.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 766 | 80.5 | −3.9 | ||
Registered electors | 952 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +6.8 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Troubridge | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Hugh Hamilton Lindsay | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 952 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Clarence Paget | 459 | 35.6 | N/A | |
Whig | Charles Grenfell | 437 | 33.9 | N/A | |
Conservative | Charles Pelham-Clinton | 392 | 30.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 45 | 3.5 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 840 (est) | 89.1 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 943 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Grenfell resigned in order to contest a by-election at Windsor, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Charles Clinton | 460 | 64.2 | +33.8 | |
Whig | John Tracy William French [19] [20] | 257 | 35.8 | −33.7 | |
Majority | 203 | 28.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 717 | 74.7 | −14.4 | ||
Registered electors | 960 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +33.8 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Charles Clinton | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | James Macgregor | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 960 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | |||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 547 | 39.2 | New | |
Whig | Clarence Paget | 503 | 36.0 | New | |
Conservative | James Macgregor | 322 | 23.1 | N/A | |
Whig | John Lang [21] [22] | 24 | 1.7 | New | |
Majority | 181 | 12.9 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 847 (est) | 84.0 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,008 | ||||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 497 | 29.5 | −9.7 | |
Liberal | Clarence Paget | 458 | 27.1 | −8.9 | |
Conservative | James Fergusson | 404 | 23.9 | +12.3 | |
Conservative | William David Lewis [23] | 328 | 19.4 | +7.8 | |
Majority | 54 | 3.2 | −9.7 | ||
Turnout | 844 (est) | 81.9 (est) | -2.1 | ||
Registered electors | 1,030 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −9.9 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −9.5 | |||
Knatchbull-Hugessen was appointed a Lord Commissioner of the Treasury, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 463 | 62.1 | +5.5 | |
Conservative | James Fergusson | 283 | 37.9 | −5.4 | |
Majority | 180 | 24.2 | +21.0 | ||
Turnout | 746 | 72.4 | −9.5 | ||
Registered electors | 1,030 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +5.5 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 494 | 35.7 | +6.2 | |
Liberal | Clarence Paget | 477 | 34.5 | +7.4 | |
Conservative | Charles Capper | 413 | 29.8 | −14.5 | |
Majority | 64 | 4.7 | +1.5 | ||
Turnout | 899 (est) | 85.2 (est) | +3.3 | ||
Registered electors | 1,054 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +6.7 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | +7.3 | |||
Paget resigned, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Capper | 466 | 50.4 | +20.6 | |
Liberal | Thomas Brassey [24] | 458 | 49.6 | −20.6 | |
Majority | 8 | 0.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 924 | 87.7 | +2.5 | ||
Registered electors | 1,054 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +20.6 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 933 | 36.4 | +0.7 | |
Liberal | Henry Brassey | 923 | 36.0 | +1.5 | |
Conservative | Henry Worms [25] | 710 | 27.7 | −2.1 | |
Majority | 213 | 8.3 | +3.6 | ||
Turnout | 1,638 (est) | 85.9 (est) | +0.7 | ||
Registered electors | 1,906 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +0.9 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | +1.3 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Henry Brassey | 1,035 | 30.3 | −5.7 | |
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 1,006 | 29.4 | −7.0 | |
Conservative | Frederic C Hughes Hallett | 764 | 22.4 | +8.5 | |
Conservative | Hugh Sydney Baillie [26] | 611 | 17.9 | +4.0 | |
Majority | 242 | 7.0 | -1.3 | ||
Turnout | 1,708 (est) | 83.5 (est) | −2.4 | ||
Registered electors | 2,046 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −6.0 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −6.6 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Henry Brassey | Unopposed | |||
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,115 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Hugessen resigned in advance of being elevated to the peerage, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Henry Crompton-Roberts | 1,145 | 61.9 | New | |
Liberal | Julian Goldsmid | 705 | 38.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 440 | 23.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,850 | 87.5 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 2,115 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | N/A | |||
A Royal Commission found proof of extensive bribery and the writ was suspended, with the by-election result being voided. The writ was never returned and the constituency was merged into East Kent on 25 June 1885, before that seat was then abolished for the 1885 general election. [17]
Canterbury is a constituency in Kent represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2017 by Rosie Duffield of the Labour Party.
Great Grimsby is a constituency in North East Lincolnshire represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom since December 2019 by Lia Nici of the Conservative Party. Between 1918 and 1983 it was known simply as Grimsby; following the 2023 Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies, the seat will be subject to boundary changes which will incorporate the neighbouring town of Cleethorpes. As a consequence, it will be renamed Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes, to be first contested at the next general election.
Bedford is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2017 by Mohammad Yasin of the Labour Party.
Dover is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2019 by Natalie Elphicke, a Conservative.
Maidstone was a parliamentary constituency represented in the Parliament of England, Great Britain and from 1801 the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Maldon is a constituency in Essex represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since its recreation in 2010 by Sir John Whittingdale, a Conservative.
Tiverton was a constituency located in Tiverton in east Devon, formerly represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Enfranchised as a parliamentary borough in 1615 and first represented in 1621, it elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) by the first past the post system of election until 1885. The name was then transferred to a county constituency electing one MP.
Beverley has been the name of a parliamentary constituency in the East Riding of Yorkshire for three periods. From medieval times until 1869 it was a parliamentary borough consisting of a limited electorate of property owners of its early designated borders within the market town of Beverley, which returned (elected) two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the English and Welsh-turned-UK Parliament during that period.
Hastings was a parliamentary constituency in Sussex. It returned two Members of Parliament to the Parliament of England until 1707, Parliament of Great Britain before 1801 and the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom until the 1885 general election, when its representation was reduced to one member. It was abolished for the 1983 general election, when it was partially replaced by the new Hastings and Rye constituency.
Rochester was a parliamentary constituency in Kent. It returned two members of parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of England from 1295 to 1707, then to the House of Commons of Great Britain from 1708 to 1800, and finally to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 until the 1885 general election, when its representation was reduced to one seat.
Scarborough was the name of a constituency in Yorkshire, electing Members of Parliament to the House of Commons, at two periods. From 1295 until 1918 it was a parliamentary borough consisting only of the town of Scarborough, electing two MPs until 1885 and one from 1885 until 1918. In 1974 the name was revived for a county constituency, covering a much wider area; this constituency was abolished in 1997.
East Kent was a county constituency in Kent in South East England. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, elected by the first past the post system.
Launceston, also known at some periods as Dunheved, was a parliamentary constituency in Cornwall which returned two Members of Parliament to the British House of Commons from 1295 until 1832, and one member from 1832 until 1918. It was a parliamentary borough until 1885, and a county constituency thereafter.
Newcastle-upon-Tyne was a parliamentary borough in the county of Northumberland of the House of Commons of England from 1283 to 1706, then of the House of Commons of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs), elected by the bloc vote system.
Boston was a parliamentary borough in Lincolnshire, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1547 until 1885, and then one member from 1885 until 1918, when the constituency was abolished.
Plymouth was a parliamentary borough in Devon, which elected two members of parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons in 1298 and again from 1442 until 1918, when the borough was merged with the neighbouring Devonport and the combined area divided into three single-member constituencies.
Portsmouth was a borough constituency based upon the borough of Portsmouth in Hampshire. It returned two members of parliament (MPs) to the Parliaments of England, Great Britain and from 1801 the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, elected by the bloc vote system.
Dartmouth, also sometimes called Clifton, Dartmouth and Hardness, was a parliamentary borough in Devon which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons in 1298 and to the Commons of England, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom from 1351 until 1832, and then one member from 1832 until 1868, when the borough was disfranchised.
Wareham was a parliamentary borough in Dorset, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1302 until 1832, and then one member from 1832 until 1885, when the borough was abolished.
Until the Reform Act 1832, there were eight constituencies in the Parliament of England and its successors related to the Cinque Ports. The cinque port constituencies were slightly different from parliamentary boroughs. The 1832 Act abolished most such distinctions, and disfranchised some of the cinque ports as rotten.