Sexual exploitation and abuse in humanitarian response

Last updated

Sexual exploitation and abuse in humanitarian response first came to public attention with the release of a report in February 2002 of a joint assessment mission examining the issue. The joint mission (composed of UNHCR-SCFUK personnel) reported that "refugee children in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone have been subjected to sexual abuse and exploitation, reportedly by employees of national and international NGOs, UNHCR and other UN bodies..." [1] Humanitarian agencies responded almost immediately with measures designed to prevent further abuse, setting up an inter-agency task force with the objective of "strengthening and enhancing the protection and care of women and children in situations of humanitarian crisis and conflict..." [2] In 2008 there were signs that sexual exploitation and abuse of beneficiaries not only continued, but was under-reported. [3] In January 2010, the ECHA/ECPS task force developed a website devoted to protection from sexual exploitation and abuse (PSEA) by personnel of the United Nations (UN), non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other international organizations. [4]

Contents

UNHCR/Save the Children 2002 report on 'sex for aid' in West Africa

A summary of the main findings of the report may be found in an article written by one of the original authors. [5] The report was based on a field mission by the team, which conducted interviews and focus groups with approximately 1,500 individuals (children and adults) in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone:

The researchers found that not only was sexual exploitation widespread, it was also perpetrated by aid workers, peacekeepers, and community leaders. Humanitarian workers traded food and relief items for sexual favors. Teachers in schools in the camps exploited children in exchange for passing grades. Medical care and medicines were given in return for sex. Some forty-two agencies and sixty-seven individuals were implicated in this behavior. Parents pressured their children to enter sexually exploitative relationships in order to secure relief items for the family. [6]

The full report was published 16 years after it was written by the UK parliament as part of its inquiry into sexual exploitation and abuse in the aid sector on 31 July 2018. [7]

Sexual exploitation and abuse by intervention forces in Central African Republic

Sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) continues to undermine UN operations thereby affecting the efficacy of these interventions. The UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic, (MINUSCA), is faced with accusations of SEA. [8] [9] Though some of the allegations of SEA in the Central African Republic (CAR) date before the UN intervention, the wide perception of the populace is that the UN forces are to blame. A research article on "sexual exploitation and abuse by intervention forces in CAR" concludes that the UN has its hands tied and has not been able to effectively enforce investigations by the TCCs since this a responsibility of the Troop/Police Contributing Countries (T/PCCs). [10]

Given the fact that the UN always faces a challenge of raising troops for PKOs it does not want to lose this ability further by blacklisting TCCs who fail to complete such investigations and punish the offenders. The system wide measures put in place in support of the "Zero tolerance policy" have not been effective. The study recommends that there should be effort to make sure that each country takes direct responsibility for the crimes perpetuated by their contingents and failure to complete investigations and conclude such cases should be enforced by strict penalties including banning from participation in Peacekeeping Operations (PKOs). [10]

Sexual exploitation and abuse by World Health Organization staff in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Over 50 women accused staff of multiple humanitarian agencies, including the World Health Organization, of sexual abuse in the Democratic Republic of Congo. [11]

Haiti 2010

Following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, it was exposed that members of many international aid organizations, and more specific the Oxfam organization [12] , exploited local girls and women for sex, among them possibly minors, in exchange for aid and material support. This took place during the relief effort on the island. An international investigation was conducted and even though members were dismissed and resigned, critics accused those organizations for covering up the extent of the abuse, while failing to protect the vulnerable population. [13] [14] [15]

Syria

2015–2018

According to a BBC investigation aid workers from local councils as well as partner organizations solicitated sexual favors from women in exchange for food and basic supplies. The BBC exposed that the abuse was a widespread phenomena is Southern Syria, done by both the UN and charity agencies. [16]

2025 sex for aid allegations

In 2025, a BBC investigation exposed allegations of “sex for aid” against Sadettin Karagoz, a retired Turkish bank worker. According to reports, he founded the Hope Charity Store in 2014, later renaming it the My Home Meal Association, an Ankara based charity that aims to help Syrian refugees. The investigation describes incidents from 2016 to 2024, based on accounts from many survivors—including three women who spoke to the BBC and seven others who witnessed or heard of the abuse. He denies the allegations, but he was arrested in 2025. [17]

South Sudan 2015-2022

Reports from South Sudan between 2015 to 2022 claim that workers in camps managed by the UN, abused people including "sex for aid". [18] Many of the cases took place in the Malakal Protection of Civilians site, with staff from groups such as IOM, MSF, WFP, and World Vision were named. [18] [19] According to investigations women and girls were raped and became pregnant. Evidence show that the UN knew about "sex for aid, as early as 2015, but no real actions were done to stop these abuses. As people in the camps were very poor and depended on aid, many women and girls felt they had no choice but to exchange sex to get food or services. [18] [19]

Among the accused were also local aid workers and peacekeepers, with evidence showing bribes to gain access to women. Culture and gender roles within the camp, made it harder to report abuse or get justice. COVID-19 disruptions weakened prevention and oversight. All this was going on, during the ongoing conflict and crisis is South Sudan, events that made displaced women and girls even more vulnerable. [20] [18] [19]

2025 aid exploitation in Gaza Strip

A 2025 investigation documented systematic sexual exploitation during Gaza’s humanitarian crisis.[21] According to the report, women in Gaza were coerced into sexual relationships by men promising food, money, water, or jobs under the guise of humanitarian aid. Evidence indicated that some perpetrators allegedly had links to local organizations collaborating with international aid groups, including UN affiliated agencies, though not all affiliations had been verified. [21] [22] Due to Gaza’s conservative society and the stigma surrounding sexual violence, most women refused to report officially or identify the perpetrators publicly. The UNs Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (PSEA) network confirmed receiving at least 18 allegations related to aid distribution in Gaza in the preceding year. [21] [22]

Response by humanitarian agencies

Investigation and sanctions

The allegations were investigated by the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), which in October 2002 issued a report concluding that it found "no widespread abuse by aid workers". In an interview with CNN in May 2002, High Commissioner for Refugees Ruud Lubbers stated, "We hardly find concrete evidence. It's very scarce". Save the Children UK (a partner in the original study) responded, "Nothing that the UN has found makes us think that we were wrong". [23]

Prevention

In July 2002, the UN's Interagency Standing Committee (IASC) adopted a plan of action which stated that sexual exploitation and abuse by humanitarian workers constitute acts of gross misconduct and are, therefore, grounds for termination of employment. The plan explicitly prohibited the "Exchange of money, employment, goods, or services for sex, including sexual favours or other forms of humiliating, degrading or exploitative behaviour". The major NGHAs and the UN agencies engaged in humanitarian response committed themselves to setting up internal structures to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse of beneficiaries. [24] [25]

UN Secretary-General's bulletin

A step towards protection from sexual exploitation was taken by the UN with its publication of the Secretary-General's Bulletin, Special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. [26] The purpose of the bulletin was to draw up standards for protecting vulnerable populations (particularly women and children) from sexual exploitation and abuse. It defines sexual exploitation as:

Any actual or attempted abuse of a position of vulnerability, differential power, or trust, for sexual purposes, including, but not limited to, profiting monetarily, socially or politically from sexual exploitation of another. [27]

It prohibits such behavior by all UN staff and by the staff of all organizations working in cooperative arrangements with the UN (i.e. NGHAs). In addition, the bulletin outlines sanctions and procedures to be followed for preventing sexual exploitation and abuse.

Building Safer Organisations project

In November 2004 a collaborative effort by a number of NGOs set up the Building Safer Organisations project (BSO), to develop the capacity of NGOs "to receive and investigate allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse brought by persons of concern—including refugees, displaced persons and local host populations". Hosted at the outset as a pilot project by the umbrella organization, the International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA), the project initially developed training materials. Using these materials, the BSO project carried out participatory workshops for NGO and UN staff. As of June 2006, a total of 137 NGO staff took part in management or investigation workshops. [28] In April 2007 BSO was moved to Humanitarian Accountability Partnership International, where it has been merged with HAP's complaints unit. [29] By April 2008, BSO had held "16 Investigation workshops; seven Investigations Follow-up workshops; seven Management workshops as well as four Training of Trainers workshops and 1 Complaints Mechanisms workshop. 522 humanitarian agency staff has participated in the BSO Learning Programme workshops." [30]

Since its inception, BSO has been helping organisations apply principles of good complaint-and-response systems to cases of sexual exploitation and abuse by staff. BSO helps NGOs achieve greater accountability by:

An independent evaluation by the Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children concluded that the "BSO learning program has proven a valuable tool for humanitarian agencies in strengthening their capacity to receive and investigate allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse of beneficiaries by staff....(and) BSO learning program materials are effective and well received". [34]

Hear Their Cries Organisation

Perceived weaknesses in UN and NGO failed attempts to stop abuse led Andrew MacLeod, Ed Flaherty, Abbe Jolles and Peter Gallo to found Hear Their Cries, an award-winning [35] organisation set up to tackle child abuse in the Aid Industry. [36]

Hear Their Cries has led the development of a new DNA technique using Genetic Genealogy to track the abusive fathers of children procreated by sex abuse. [37]

MacLeod has been a leading voice in international media [38] in speaking out about aid worker abuse.

Reasons for few complaints

Two 2008 studies have pointed out that disaster survivors who have been sexually exploited (or abused) by aid workers often do not complain. Save the Children explains the lack of complaints thus:

On 25 June 2008 the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership International (HAP) released a report on sexual exploitation and abuse, "To complain or not to complain: still the question." This report includes details for three countries in which consultations were held. It concludes:

Sexual exploitation and abuse is a predictable result of a failure of accountability to beneficiaries of humanitarian aid. The single most important reason for this 'humanitarian accountability deficit' is the asymmetrical principal-agent relations that characterise most 'humanitarian' transactions, that puts the users of humanitarian assistance at a structural disadvantage in their relationship with humanitarian aid providers. [40]

See also

Humanitarian aid

References

  1. "Mano River Union: Reports that child refugees sexually exploited shock Annan". irinnews.org. 27 February 2002. Retrieved 7 October 2010.
  2. Iain Levine and Mark Bowden (15 October 2002). "Protection from sexual exploitation and abuse in humanitarian crises: the humanitarian community's response" (PDF). Forced Migration Review. p. 20.
  3. "No One to Turn To" (PDF). Save the Children UK. 2008.
  4. "protection from secual exploitation and abuse by UN and related personnel". PSEA task force. Retrieved 7 October 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  5. Asmita Naik (15 October 2002). "Protecting Children from the Protectors: Lessons from West Africa" (PDF). Forced Migration Review.
  6. Ferris, Beth (2007). "Abuse of Power: Sexual Exploitation of Refugee Women and Girls". Brookings Institution.
  7. "Sexual violence and exploitation: the experience of refugee children in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone" (PDF). www.parliament.uk. January 2002.
  8. "MINUSCA action plan on sexual exploitation and abuse 2018 –2019 matrix of activities" (PDF). minusca.unmissions.org.
  9. Report of an independent review on sexual exploitation and abuse by international peacekeeping forces in the Central African Republic: “Taking action on sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers” (A/71/99). 23 June 2016.
  10. 1 2 Mwanyika, Elijah Mwasi. (2021). Sexual exploitation and abuse by intervention forces in Central African Republic. African Journal of Empirical Research, 2 (1), 63-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51867/ajer.v2i1.14
  11. Farge, Emma; Holland, Hereward (2021-09-29). "WHO employees took part in Congo sex abuse during Ebola crisis, report says". Reuters. Retrieved 2021-11-19.
  12. "Oxfam, British Charity, Admits Sexual Misconduct by Workers in Haiti (Published 2018)". 2018-02-09. Retrieved 2025-10-27.
  13. Gharib, Malaka (2018-02-15). "Why Sex Scandals Persist In The Humanitarian Aid World". NPR. Retrieved 2025-10-27.
  14. "Sexual abuse 'endemic' in international aid sector, damning report finds". 2018.
  15. "Oxfam Haiti allegations: How the scandal unfolded". 2018-02-20. Retrieved 2025-10-27.
  16. "Syria conflict: Women 'sexually exploited in return for aid'". 2018-02-27. Retrieved 2025-10-27.
  17. "Charity boss arrest in BBC sex-for-aid investigation 'gives women strength'". www.bbc.com. 2025-10-25. Retrieved 2025-10-27.
  18. 1 2 3 4 "EXCLUSIVE: Alleged sex abuse by aid workers unchecked for years in UN-run South Sudan camp". www.thenewhumanitarian.org. 2022-09-22. Retrieved 2025-10-27.
  19. 1 2 3 Craze, Sam Mednick,Joshua. "Sex abuse allegations against aid workers in South Sudan UN camp". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2025-10-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. "SOUTH SUDAN STUDY ON THE STATUS OF AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR REPARATIONS FOR SURVIVORS OF CONFLICT-RELATED SEXUAL VIOLENCE" (PDF). 2022.
  21. 1 2 Mednick, Sam; Abou Aljoud, Sally; Cogan, Janelle (2025-10-10). "Middle East team uncovers sexual exploitation in Gaza". The Associated Press. Retrieved 2025-10-27.
  22. 1 2 AlJoud, -Sally Abou; AlJoud, Associated Press Sally Abou; Press, Associated (2025-09-30). "Women in Gaza say they were exploited by men promising food, money in exchange for sex". PBS News. Retrieved 2025-10-27.
  23. Quoted in Asmita Naik: "The West Africa sex scandal" HPN
  24. Iain Levine and Mark Bowden (15 October 2002). "Protection from sexual exploitation and abuse in humanitarian crises: the humanitarian community's response" (PDF). Forced Migration Review. p. 20.
  25. "IASC, Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse" (PDF).
  26. "Secretary-General's Bulletin" (PDF).
  27. "Secretary-General's Bulletin" (PDF). p. 1.
  28. "Women's Commission Evaluation". Archived from the original on 2007-10-27. Retrieved 2008-10-03.
  29. "HAP Projects".
  30. "To complain or not to complain: still the question" (PDF). p. 12, fn. 6.
  31. "Guidelines" (PDF). hapinternational.org.
  32. "Handbook" (PDF). hapinternational.org.
  33. "HAP Services". hapinternational.org.
  34. "Women's Commission Evaluation June 2006". icva.ch. Archived from the original on 2007-10-27. Retrieved 2008-12-04.
  35. "Voordat je verdergaat naar Google Zoeken". www.google.com. Retrieved 2025-01-05.
  36. "Hear Their Cries". www.heartheircries.org. Retrieved 2025-01-05.
  37. "The ISHI Report November 2020 - the Children Left Behind".
  38. "CNN.com - Transcripts". Archived from the original on 2024-05-09. Retrieved 2025-01-05.
  39. ""No One to Turn To" Save the Children UK". 2008. p. 20.
  40. "To complain or not to complain: still the question" (PDF). reliefweb.int. p. 52.