Sunella | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Scientific classification ![]() | |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Arthropoda |
Order: | † Isoxyida |
Family: | † Sunellidae |
Genus: | † Sunella Huo, 1965 [3] [6] |
Type species | |
†Sunella grandis | |
Species | |
Synonyms | |
Sunella is an extinct genus of Cambrian stem group arthropod. [2] [7] It was described by Huo Shicheng in 1965. [8] [6] [3] [9] [4] [10] It is the type genus of the family Sunellidae. [3] [4] [6] [10] Its type species is S. grandis. [2] [3] [6] [4] It was assigned to the order Isoxyida by Collantes & Pates, 2025. [2]
In the original description (Huo, 1965), Sunella was described as an Ostracod-like arthropod; [11] [6] [3] then as an arthropod of uncertain affinities; [3] [2] [9] [4] then as a bradoriid [11] [12] [13] [14] [8] [15] and then as an arthropod of uncertain affinities; [11] [16] then as a species of Isoxys along with other Sunellids in Vannier & Chen 2000; [9] [2] [3] [17] in later studies such as Zhang and Shu, 2007 and Sun et. al. 2021 [3] [4] it was classified as an arthropod of uncertain affinities possibly related to Tuzoia and Silesicaris, [3] a relationship that was later rejected due to the fact that Silesicaris was reassigned to Thylacocephala and in 2022 Tuzoia was reassigned to Hymenocarina; [18] [3] [16] Sun et al. 2021 it was again considered an arthropod of uncertain affinities, [4] though similarities with Isoxys were noted and a relationship with Isoxys was suggested, as in Zhang and Shu, 2007; [3] [4] it was not until 2025 that it was formally assigned to Isoxyida by Collantes & Pates, 2025; which in turn makes Sunella an upper stem group arthropod among the most basal Deuteropods. [2] [19]
Species of Sunella include:
A species that previously belonged to Sunella, S. bispinata, [10] [28] and was moved to it’s own genus, Caudicaella (Sun et al. 2021) [4] [2] as Caudicaella bispinata (Cui and Huo, 1990). [4] [2] [10] [9] Synonyms include Isoxys bispinata (Zhang et al., 2018) [29] (not to be confused with Isoxys bispinatus) [2] [9] Isoxys sp.(Sun et al. 2021) (for the specimens from the Heatherdale shale, not the Shuijingtuo formation) [9] [4]
One former species is Sunella parva (Melnikova, 1988), [15] [8] [30] which may be the larval form of a new species of Tuzoia [18] [4] and was rejected from Sunella by Melnikova 1998 [8] [15] [30] and may need to be assigned to its own genus. [15] [3] [18] [30] It has also been suggested to be a Bradoriid. [15] [8]
Sunellidae, which Sunella belongs to originally included two other genera, Chiella (Huo, 1965) and Luella (Huo, 1965), [6] but after Huo & Shu, 1985Chiella was considered a junior synonym of Sunella [3] and after Zhang & Shu, 2007Luella was considered a probable sexual dimorph of Sunella. [3] [12] [2]
Sunella fossils have been found in the Chengjiang biota (exact locality cannot be determined; [3] dated to no older than 518 Ma), [31] [26] the Shuijingtuo formation (dated to around 526.5 Ma), [32] [10] [30] [4] [33] the Qingjiang biota (dated to ~518 ma), [27] the Niutitang formation ( generally Meishucunian (Cambrian Stage 2) to Nangaoan (Cambrian Stage 3) but may be up to as old as the Fortunian in some sections) [1] [5] and the Guojiaba formation (tentatively assigned to Cambrian Stage 3), [3] [34] all of which are in China. [3] [4] Similiar fossils have been found at other formations in China but they are relatively uncommon and poorly studied and therefore cannot be confidently assigned to this genus or even Sunellidae. [3] The former species Caudicaella bispinata is also known from the Heatherdale shale in Australia. [2] [9]
Usually the only part of Sunella that is preserved is the carapace, but rarely (only twenty-two times in Sunella cf. shensiella and only six in the related Combinivalvula chenjiangensis) soft tissue is also preserved. When this occurs, the carapace usually adopts a "butterfly" position, possibly due to the decay of the adductor muscles that hold it together. [3] Only the soft parts of Sunella cf. shensiella and the related Combinivalvula chenjiangensis (Hou, 1987) [35] [36] [16] have been preserved. [3] [2]
Sunella grandis had a bivalved [37] roughly semicircular carapace with an anterodorsal sulcus and cardinal spines, [35] a typical bodyplan for a Sunellid, [9] [4] [2] [3] while S. cf. shensiella had a more oval shaped carapace, shorter cardinal spines and an anterodorsal sulcus pointing at a slightly lower angle. [3] [4] Both species have shorter cardinal spines than Caudicaella bispinata also Caudicaella bispinata had a longer carapace in relation to the height of the carapace relative to S. grandis. [3] [4] [9] Probable Sexual dimorphism has been recorded in both species. [3] [2] [4] The carapace of S.grandis is typically 6.5-8.5 mm. [3] [4] The largest specimen is 15mm, which is the largest recorded for a Sunellid. [4] [2] [9]
The soft parts of S. cf. shensiella and Combinivalvula chengjiangensis show that Sunellids had non-biomineralized Biramous limbs similar to the related Isoxyidae and a clearly segmented trunk. [3] [9] [2] The related Combinivalvula chenjiangensis also preserves a possible median eye. [3] [36] Neither the cephalic appendages nor proximal portions of trunk limbs as found in the related Isoxyidae are known. [2] [3]
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)