The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789

Last updated

The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789
Middlekauff, The Glorious Cause, revised edition.png
Revised edition cover
Author Robert Middlekauff
SeriesThe Oxford History of the United States
Subject American Revolution
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publication date
June 3, 1982 (original)
February 1, 2005 (revised)
Media typePrint (hardcover)
Pages712
ISBN 0-19-502921-6
Preceded byImperial America, 1672–1764 (planned; unreleased) 
Followed by Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815  

The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789 is a nonfiction book about the American Revolution written by American historian Robert Middlekauff. Covering the history of the American Revolution from around 1760 through to the adoption of the Constitution of the United States, The Glorious Cause focuses mainly on the military history of the American Revolutionary War and on the leadership of Continental Army leader George Washington. Middlekauff writes with overt sympathy for the revolutionary cause. His detailed coverage of the war emphasizes its physical brutality.

Contents

First released as a clothbound hardcover in 1982, The Glorious Cause was the first volume to be published in the Oxford History of the United States series (though a chronologically prior volume about the colonial history of the United States was and remains planned). Although editors C. Vann Woodward and Richard Hofstadter had embarked on the series in 1961, multiple other candidates to write the volume on the American Revolution fell through before Middlekauff was assigned to the task in the 1970s.

Multiple reviewers praised The Glorious Cause's style and readability, deeming it accessible to lay audiences and exciting to read. Other assessments were divided. Multiple reviewers criticized the absence of social history and the limited coverage of Loyalists, [lower-alpha 1] women, American Indians, and Black people. Others averred that the book ably synthesized the scholarship on the American Revolution and praised it as an overall history of the period. Reviews described the book as a traditionalist reassertion of the Whig view of history [lower-alpha 2] or as a novel contribution to new developments in political and military history. The Glorious Cause was a finalist for the 1983 Pulitzer Prize.

In 2005, Oxford University Press published a revised edition of The Glorious Cause. The new edition contains more social history, including coverage of American Indians, Black people, Loyalists, and women, though it remains focused on politics, war, and constitutionalism. The Library Journal and The Atlantic praised the revised edition's narrative and style.

Background

Oxford University Press, publisher of the Oxford History of the United States and of The Glorious Cause Jericho Oxford University Press.jpg
Oxford University Press, publisher of the Oxford History of the United States and of The Glorious Cause

Oxford University Press publishes multiple book series called "Oxford histories"; for the most part, these series are crafted to provide general syntheses rather than novel interpretations. [3] [lower-alpha 3] In 1961, historians C. Vann Woodward and Richard Hofstadter began coediting the Oxford History of the United States series together, [6] though Hofstadter died before the series published any books. [7] Woodward grew concerned that twentieth-century historical scholarship was overemphasizing analysis and losing touch with narrative, resultantly becoming fragmented as a discipline and disconnected from the interests of laypeople; he wanted the Oxford series to reassert the importance of narrative history and to reach the general public as an audience. [8] In an introduction, Woodward attested that the series would synthesize the scholarship of "the latest generation of historians". [9] By 1982, general syntheses had been out of fashion for years. [10]

Publication

The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker's Hill, June 17, 1775 by John Trumbull The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker's Hill.jpg
The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker's Hill, June 17, 1775 by John Trumbull

Initially, Hofstadter and Woodward sought to persuade Bernard Bailyn to write the series' second volume, planned to cover the American Revolution. When they did not secure Bailyn as the volume's author, they contacted Merrill D. Peterson, and he formally agreed in 1964 to write the book, but stepped down from the task in 1967, saying he was becoming too old to do it. [11] Merrill Jensen, who had initially agreed in 1962 to write what was then planned to be the series' first volume (on the colonial history of the United States) but had been asking to be switched to write about the American Revolution, was reassigned to replace Peterson. [12] When Woodward asked Jensen about his progress as of December 1970, Jensen reported that he had made none and surmised the series might be better off with a new, younger scholar for the project, to which Woodward agreed, dropping Jensen from the series. [11]

Woodward contacted historian Robert Middlekauff and signed him on to replace Jensen as writer of the series' volume on the American Revolution, making Middlekauff the third author the series had contacted for that task. [13] Before writing for the Oxford History of the United States, Middlekauff had been known as a specialist in colonial American history. [14] He was the author of the 1963 Ancients and Axioms: Secondary Education in Eighteenth-Century New England and the 1971 The Mathers: Three Generations of Puritan Intellectuals, 1596–1728. [15]

Oxford University Press published the first edition of The Glorious Cause in 1982 [16] as a 712-page-long [17] clothbound hardcover. [18] On release, The Glorious Cause sold for $25 (USD, equivalent to $79in 2023) or £15 (GBP, equivalent to $56in 2021). [19] It was the first volume to be published as part of its series. [20] At the time of its publication, The Glorious Cause was presented as the second volume in a projected eleven-volume series, [21] with an unreleased but planned volume expected to address the American continent's history before 1763. [22] Later, the series planned to produce two volumes on history before 1763 (The Glorious Cause will be the third volume chronologically). [23] As of 2011, the chronologically second volume of the series was planned to be Imperial America, 1672–1764. [24]

To mark the release of the Oxford History of the United States' first volume, series editor Woodward wrote an essay published in the New York Times Book Review defending the practice of narrative history. [25] Titled "A Short History of American History", Woodward's essay averred that historians since the 1960s had neglected nonspecialist readers as an audience and insisted the field had "the duty and privilege, unlike scholars of other disciplines", to write "in readable, unspecialized prose that [laypeople] can understand and enjoy". [8]

Content

The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789 is a single-volume history of the American Revolution. [26] It begins with the general state of British North America in 1760, [27] and it ends with the making and establishing of the Constitution of the United States. [28] [lower-alpha 4] Middlekauff explicitly notes that his title is not meant "as irony", [31] and he writes as "an American patriot", in the words of historian Carl Bridenbaugh, [32] whose sympathies lie with those American colonists who were in revolt. [33]

The book divides into roughly three parts; somewhat less than half of the book treats the estrangement of the American colonies from Great Britain, about 250 pages on the American Revolutionary War follow, and the final 80 pages treat the challenges of governance with the Articles of Confederation [lower-alpha 5] and the adoption of the Constitution. [35] About a third of the book focuses on military history. [9] In a review, Bridenbaugh argued that Middlekauff's approach made military history "the central theme" of the era. [36] The leadership of George Washington, commander of the revolutionaries' Continental Army, is emphasized "above all", according to reviewer E. B. Van Heyningen. [37] Historian Richard D. Brown summed up the book's "main theme [a]s that of George Washington and his associates winning the war and the peace". [38] The chapters covering the war emphasize an American perspective on the conflict. [39] The Glorious Cause does not address the war's western front. [40] Its depiction of the war emphasizes its brutality, highlighting atrocities committed by both sides in the conflict, including those directed against non-combatants. [41]

The Glorious Cause characterizes the American revolutionaries as having been widely influenced by fervent Protestantism, [42] portrays the Founding Fathers as having been pious and providentialist, [lower-alpha 6] and avers that their ancestors were religiously motivated to leave England to establish a new society in North America. [44] In the words of reviewer Morgan Dederer, Middlekauff "perceives the American colonist's[ sic ] break with Great Britain almost as a religious event couched in philosophical/political terms". [45]

The book includes illustrations, all but one of which are portraits, and maps of battles. [46] The book includes a five-and-a-half-page bibliographic essay [47] and an index. [3] The first edition's dust jacket bears artist John Trumbull's painting The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker's Hill, June 17, 1775. [48]

Reception

Accessibility

Bridenbaugh called The Glorious Cause "richly detailed, readable, and rewarding" and praised its "lively, if colloquial, style that will please most American readers". [49] Historian Jack P. Greene praised the book's readability, summing up that the "style is lively, the narrative flow rapid, and the scholarly analysis unobtrusive". [50] In her book review, historian Mary Beth Norton wrote that The Glorious Cause is written to be "accessible to the general public". [51] Historian William W. Freehling noted the book's affordability for everyday consumers, averring that its price "will not dent the family budget horridly". [52]

Storytelling

Reviewer W. Stitt Robinson praised Middlekauff for "skillfully weav[ing] an exciting story". [53] Historian Ann Gorman Condon considered the detailed coverage of "[m]ob scenes, battle tactics, Washington's leadership qualities" the book's "superb moments". [54] According to historian Don Higginbotham, "the story moves, especially in descriptions of the smoke and din of battle when the narrative become fast-paced and sometimes exciting". [55] Literature professor Robert Reynolds wrote that although Middlekauff "is a very intelligent writer" with "interesting views and judgments which he backs up effectively", the book is challenging to read, as The Glorious Cause on multiple occasions presents events and figures without reminding readers of what or who they are, and occasionally without introducing them at all. [56]

Gordon S. Wood wrote a critical review of The Glorious Cause in 1982 and recommended it to Five Books readers in 2020. Gordon Wood historian 2006.jpg
Gordon S. Wood wrote a critical review of The Glorious Cause in 1982 and recommended it to Five Books readers in 2020.

Gordon S. Wood, who had agreed in 1982 to write the chronologically next volume in the series (covering United States history from 1789 to 1815), wrote what historian James C. Cobb called a "sharply critical" review of The Glorious Cause in the New York Review of Books which called into question whether traditional narrative history was a valid method. [57] Oxford University Press editor Sheldon Meyer suspected that Wood's review of The Glorious Cause partly motivated the 1985 departure from the series of T. H. Breen, who had agreed as early as 1970 to write the volume on the colonial era. [58]

Coverage

According to Greene, an academic synthesis The Glorious Cause lacks balance because it "ignores several of the more important interpretive problems raised by […] scholarship". [59] Norton argued that "professional historians will probably be more than a little disappointed". [9] Reviewer G. C. Gibbs wrote that the book's relative inattention to the colonial and transatlantic economies as well as to world history was "to be regretted", and he criticized the unsympathetic coverage of British imperial policy arguing that the book tended to depict British ministers as inflexible "to the point of political insanity". [60] Richard D. Brown and Wallace Brown criticized The Glorious Cause for only marginally covering the topic of Loyalism. [61] [lower-alpha 1] Reviewer Sydney V. James criticized the cursory treatment of the postwar period after the Siege of Yorktown, stating that the remaining events "tumble down in a rush" and that of such topics, "the Confederation period gets the poorest treatment". [62] Greene concurred that The Glorious Cause's coverage of the Articles of Confederation did not adequately synthesize the scholarship then current. [63] Gibbs considered The Glorious Cause a "seriously disappointing work" because of making numerous "faults of commission and omission". [64]

Some reviewers criticized The Glorious Cause for its marginal treatment of women's history. Molly Gutridge, Ezekiel Russell, 1779.png
Some reviewers criticized The Glorious Cause for its marginal treatment of women's history.

Richard D. Brown also criticized Middlekauff for giving minimal attention to social history and women's history and for misrepresenting the history of slavery in the United States, such as in the inaccurate claim that the southern states cooperated with the northern United States to terminate the slave trade. [65] The Glorious Cause addresses women's history less than twenty-five times. [66] There are only three pages about African Americans in the Revolutionary War, [67] covering a few Black people who escaped enslavement by Patriot colonists and joined the British between 1775 and 1776, and Norton criticized The Glorious Cause for leaving out "the many thousands more who flocked to the British standard between 1778 and 1781". [68] According to historians Robinson, Wallace Brown, and Kristofer Ray, The Glorious Cause is inattentive to the role and experiences of Native Americans, such as the Cherokee and Haudenosaunee. [69]

Greene suspected that Middlekauff intentionally disobeyed the series instruction to write a comprehensive synthesis to instead write a "personal reading of the Revolutionary experience", a choice that Greene called a "wise decision" because of the historiography's complexity; in Greene's assessment, The Glorious Cause still "will both appeal to nonspecialists and repay the close attention of scholars". [70] Acknowledging the book "is more concerned with such traditional topics as government, politics, and war" than with topics of social history, reviewer George William Pilcher assessed The Glorious Cause as "a first rate work of historical synthesis" and argued that it "has not ignored the interweaving of social and political events". [71] Historian I. R. Christie called The Glorious Cause "a fine general account which will justly rank as a standard work". [28] Robinson praised Middlekauff for "appropriate use of much of the latest historical research in this field" and considered The Glorious Cause a "commendable blend of the work of other scholars with his own research". [53] John E. Selby called The Glorious Cause a "traditional comprehensive work" that "incorporate[s] the newer insights" of the field of American revolutionary history. [72]

According to Condon, the first and third sections—covering the lead-up to the war for independence and the postwar period—are unbalanced and flawed but the second section, focused on military history, is "full of solid information and good insights": Middlekauff "skillfully assesse[s]" both sides' military commanders, sympathetically captures the human experience of the conflict, and thickly details the life of "the common soldier: his recruitment, training, life in camp, medical attention, wives and mistresses, and abiding loneliness". [73] According to Trevor Burnard in 2011, The Glorious Cause focuses on war too much, distorting the history of the period. [74]

Religion

Middlekauff argued that religious motives played a significant role in the American Revolution. Valley Forge prayer.jpg
Middlekauff argued that religious motives played a significant role in the American Revolution.

At the time of The Glorious Cause's publication, Gibbs and Robinson praised the novelty of Middlekauff's argument that religion played a major role in motivating the American Revolution. [75] Higginbotham's review averred that the book's "religious theme has interesting possibilities" but Middlekauff did not sufficiently integrate it with the narrative after 1775. [76] Burnard criticized Middlekauff's depiction of religion and noted that the chronologically next volume in the series, Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815 (published in 2009), depicts the Founding Fathers as having been "noticeably irreligious" rather than pious. [77]

Perspective

Norton characterized The Glorious Cause as being a "standard political-constitutional-military account of the Revolution that could have appeared a decade ago nearly in its present form", because it overemphasizes colonial elites and New England, depicting the American Revolution as a movement "from the top down rather than the bottom up", contrary to scholarship that identified the "dynamic uncertainty of the prewar and war years". [78] According to James, The Glorious Cause mentions but deemphasizes socioeconomic clashes among American colonists, carrying on a "patriotic tradition" of history that makes "Loyalists seem innately to have been aliens in their own land". [79] Higginbotham argued that in The Glorious Cause Middlekauff is "aware of divisions within American society". [80]

In his review, Richard D. Brown called The Glorious Cause "an up-to-date restatement of the Whig view". [81] [lower-alpha 2] Higginbotham considered The Glorious Cause "reasonably compatible with the neo-whig or consensus" schools of thought that emphasized disastrous British policy, deemphasized economic history, and centered the Revolutionary War. [82] Historian Kristofer Ray argued that The Glorious Cause was part of a Cold War-era historiography shaped "by neo-Whig insistence" on the "inevitability of American independence". [83] Burnard called The Glorious Cause a "neo-Whig book" and averred that Middlekauff "virtually ignores" historical scholarship that argues the Revolution and Constitution were controversial and divided early Americans. [7] Condon criticized the book as having an "outworn, nostalgic interpretation" and called it "at bottom a romance" in which George Washington and the revolutionaries are heroes, the "villains are the wicked British ministry", and the Revolutionary War is inevitable. [84] Pilcher considered Middlekauff's approach "far from traditional, emphasizing as it does, the best of the 'new' military and political history". [71]

Honors

The Glorious Cause was a finalist for the 1983 Pulitzer Prize. [85] In a 2020 interview, Gordon S. Wood included The Glorious Cause in a list of books about the Fourth of July that he recommended to Five Books readers and called it "one of the best accounts" of the Revolutionary War. [86] A 2021 New York Times obituary for Middlekauff reported that he was "best known" for having written The Glorious Cause, "considered one of the best one-volume histories of the American Revolution". [87]

Revised edition

Surrender of Lord Cornwallis by John Trumbull (1820) Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.jpg
Surrender of Lord Cornwallis by John Trumbull (1820)

In 2005, Oxford University Press published a revised edition of The Glorious Cause. [88] The revised edition includes additional content about the experience and participation of women, American Indians, enslaved people, and Loyalists during the American Revolution, more coverage of riots against British measures prior to 1776, [89] an updated bibliographic essay, and a new epilogue. [90] Most of the new material is social history, though the book's overall focus remains on political, military, and constitutional history. [26] It is approximately 800 pages long and on release sold for $40 (USD, equivalent to $62in 2023). [90] Kathleen M. Lynch designed the front cover, which bears American painter John Trumbull's 1820 artwork, Surrender of Lord Cornwallis . [91]

Revised edition's reception

Reviewing it for the Library Journal , librarian Robert Flatley considered the revised edition "narrative history at its best, written in a conversational and engaging style" and recommended it for libraries seeking a "single-volume, up-to-date history of the Revolutionary period". [90] The Island Packet considered the revised edition an "ambitious book" of "fascinating history". [92] Atlantic literary editor Benjamin Schwarz called it "the best one-volume history of the American Revolution, and among the best narrative American histories of the past half century". [93]

Notes

  1. 1 2 Loyalists were American colonists who supported the British Crown and country throughout the revolutionary period, from 1765 onward. There were Loyalists in all thirteen of the British North American colonies; they were most concentrated in New York and South Carolina. [1]
  2. 1 2 Coined by the historian Herbert Butterfield, the Whig view of history refers to an interpretive approach that takes history as nearly always a narrative of progress that inevitably creates the conditions of the present. [2]
  3. ↑ Other examples of Oxford histories include the New Oxford History of England [4] and the Oxford History of South Africa. [5]
  4. ↑ The United States' second constitution, the U. S. Constitution was created by a 1787 Constitutional Convention to replace the country's first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, on the grounds that the national government created by the latter was unable to meet the needs of postwar governance (particularly for what constitutional proponents perceived as failures in foreign affairs and national solvency). [29] The Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation and went into effect in 1788. [30]
  5. ↑ Also called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, this document was the United States' first constitution, endorsed by the Continental Congress in November 1777, fully ratified by all thirteen states by March 1781, and in effect until the adoption of the U. S. Constitution in 1788. Under the Articles of Confederation, each state had a single vote in a unicameral national legislature which had the authority to levy taxes. [34]
  6. ↑ Particularly in early modernity, Protestant Christians commonly believed in providence, the idea that world events are influenced or even directed by the creator God in which they believed. [43]

Citations

  1. ↑ Coleman (2006, p. 310).
  2. ↑ Blackburn (2016, p. 504).
  3. 1 2 Van Heyningen (1986 , p. 298).
  4. ↑ Burnard (2011, p. 409).
  5. ↑ Van Heyningen (1986, p. 298).
  6. ↑ Cobb (2022 , p. 264).
  7. 1 2 Burnard (2011 , p. 410).
  8. 1 2 McElya (2011 , p. 422).
  9. 1 2 3 Norton (1983 , p. 965).
  10. ↑ Higginbotham (1983 , p. 455).
  11. 1 2 Cobb (2022 , p. 372).
  12. ↑ Cobb (2022 , pp. 371–372).
  13. ↑ Cobb (2022 , pp. 374–375).
  14. ↑ Higginbotham (1983 , p. 455).
  15. ↑ Dixler (2021 , paragraphs 13–14).
  16. ↑ Condon (1984 , p. 287).
  17. ↑ Higginbotham (1983 , p. 455); Greene (1983 , p. 1060); James (1983 , p. 601).
  18. ↑ Pilcher (1983 , p. 617).
  19. ↑ For the price in United States dollars, see Greene (1983 , p. 1060); D. Brown (1984 , p. 695). For the price in British pounds sterling, see Christie (1983 , p. 635).
  20. ↑ Brown (1984 , p. 436); Dederer (1984 , p. 102); Greene (1983 , pp. 1060) Van Heyningen (1986 , p. 288).
  21. ↑ Higginbotham (1983 , p. 455); James (1983 , p. 601); Robinson (1983 , p. 118).
  22. ↑ Bridenbaugh (1983 , p. 132).
  23. ↑ Burnard (2011 , pp. 407, 413).
  24. ↑ Talbott (2011 , paragraph 2).
  25. ↑ Cobb (2022 , p. 377).
  26. 1 2 Schwarz (2005 , p. 104).
  27. ↑ Condon (1984 , p. 289).
  28. 1 2 Christie (1983 , p. 636).
  29. ↑ Kelly (2003, p. 378).
  30. ↑ Kromkowski (2003, p. 317).
  31. ↑ Brown (1984 , p. 437).
  32. ↑ Bridenbaugh (1983 , p. 133).
  33. ↑ Robinson (1983 , p. 118).
  34. ↑ Kromkowski (2003, p. 317).
  35. ↑ Christie (1983 , p. 636) gives these page counts. For the third section being coverage of the Confederation period and the adoption of the Constitution, see Condon (1984 , pp. 289–290). See also Greene (1983 , p. 1060), who describes the book's breakdown as 40% covering the pre-war years, 50% covering the war years, and 10% on the Confederation period and emergence of the Constitution.
  36. ↑ Bridenbaugh (1983 , p. 134).
  37. ↑ For the emphasis on Washington, see Van Heyningen (1986 , p. 299). For Washington being commander of the Continental Army, see Middlekauff (2005 , p. 287).
  38. ↑ D. Brown (1984 , p. 696).
  39. ↑ Conway (2016 , "Discussion of the Literature", paragraph 2).
  40. ↑ Dederer (1984 , p. 102)
  41. ↑ Pilcher (1983 , pp. 617–618).
  42. ↑ Robinson (1983 , p. 118); Noll (1993 , p. 625).
  43. ↑ Randall (2004, pp. 88–89).
  44. ↑ Burnard (2011 , p. 408).
  45. ↑ Dederer (1984 , p. 102).
  46. ↑ Brown (1984 , pp. 436–437).
  47. ↑ Robinson (1983 , p. 119).
  48. ↑ Dann (1982 , p. 5B).
  49. ↑ Bridenbaugh (1983 , pp. 133–134).
  50. ↑ Greene (1983 , p. 1060).
  51. ↑ Norton (1983 , p. 964).
  52. ↑ Freehling (1982 , p. D5).
  53. 1 2 Robinson (1983 , p. 118).
  54. ↑ Condon (1984 , p. 289).
  55. ↑ Higginbotham (1983 , p. 458).
  56. ↑ Reynolds (2017 , paragraphs 2–7).
  57. ↑ Cobb (2022 , pp. 378–379).
  58. ↑ Cobb (2022 , pp. 375, 378).
  59. ↑ Greene (1983 , pp. 1060–1061)
  60. ↑ Gibbs (1985 , pp. 429, 431).
  61. ↑ Brown (1984 , pp. 436–437); D. Brown (1984 , p. 696).
  62. ↑ James (1983 , p. 602).
  63. ↑ Greene (1983 , p. 1060).
  64. ↑ Gibbs (1985 , p. 431).
  65. ↑ D. Brown (1984 , p. 696).
  66. ↑ Burnard (2011 , p. 412).
  67. ↑ Condon (1984 , p. 290).
  68. ↑ Norton (1983 , p. 965).
  69. ↑ Robinson (1983 , p. 119); Brown (1984 , p. 436); Ray (2020 , "Discussion of Literature", paragraph 2).
  70. ↑ Greene (1983 , pp. 1060–1061).
  71. 1 2 Pilcher (1983 , p. 617).
  72. ↑ Selby (1994 , p. 8).
  73. ↑ Condon (1984 , pp. 289–290).
  74. ↑ Burnard (2011 , p. 415).
  75. ↑ Gibbs (1985 , p. 430); Robinson (1983 , p. 118).
  76. ↑ Higginbotham (1983 , p. 456).
  77. ↑ Burnard (2011 , pp. 408–409).
  78. ↑ Norton (1983 , p. 965).
  79. ↑ James (1983 , pp. 602–603).
  80. ↑ Higginbotham (1983 , p. 456).
  81. ↑ D. Brown (1984 , p. 695).
  82. ↑ Higginbotham (1983 , pp. 456–457).
  83. ↑ Ray (2020 , "Discussion of Literature", paragraph 2).
  84. ↑ Condon (1984 , pp. 288–289).
  85. ↑ Bloch (2021 , p. 306); "Finalist: The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789, by Robert L. Middlekauff (Oxford University Press)" . Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  86. ↑ Wood (2020 , title, subtitle, paragraphs 1, 8–10).
  87. ↑ Dixler (2021 , paragraphs 1, 4).
  88. ↑ McElya (2011 , p. 424).
  89. ↑ Dixler (2021 , paragraph 8).
  90. 1 2 3 Flatley (2005 , p. 145).
  91. ↑ Middlekauff (2005 , inside back flap of the dust jacket).
  92. ↑ Selleck (2005 , p. 7).
  93. ↑ Schwarz (2005 , pp. 103–104).

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Revolution</span> 1765–1791 period establishing the US

The American Revolution was a rebellion and political revolution in the Thirteen Colonies, which culminated in colonists initiating an ultimately successful war for independence against the Kingdom of Great Britain. Leaders of the American Revolution were colonial separatist leaders who originally sought more autonomy within the British political system as British subjects, but later assembled to support the Revolutionary War, which successfully ended British colonial rule over the colonies, establishing their independence, and leading to the creation of the United States of America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the United States (1776–1789)</span>

The history of the United States from 1776 to 1789 was marked by the nation's transition from the American Revolutionary War to the establishment of a novel constitutional order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intolerable Acts</span> Series of punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774

The Intolerable Acts, sometimes referred to as the Insufferable Acts or Coercive Acts, were a series of five punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. The laws aimed to punish Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in the Tea Party protest of the Tea Act, a tax measure enacted by Parliament in May 1773. In Great Britain, these laws were referred to as the Coercive Acts. They were a key development leading to the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War in April 1775.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colonial government in the Thirteen Colonies</span> Organization and structure of the British Colonial administration in the later US East Coast

The governments of the Thirteen Colonies of British America developed in the 17th and 18th centuries under the influence of the British constitution. After the Thirteen Colonies had become the United States, the experience under colonial rule would inform and shape the new state constitutions and, ultimately, the United States Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Historiography of the French Revolution</span> Field of historical study

The historiography of the French Revolution stretches back over two hundred years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sugar Act</span> British legislation imposing import duties on American colonies

The Sugar Act 1764 or Sugar Act 1763, also known as the American Revenue Act 1764 or the American Duties Act, was a revenue-raising act passed by the Parliament of Great Britain on 5 April 1764. The preamble to the act stated: "it is expedient that new provisions and regulations should be established for improving the revenue of this Kingdom ... and ... it is just and necessary that a revenue should be raised ... for defraying the expenses of defending, protecting, and securing the same." The earlier Molasses Act 1733, which had imposed a tax of six pence per gallon of molasses, had never been effectively collected due to colonial evasion. By reducing the rate by half and increasing measures to enforce the tax, Parliament hoped that the tax would actually be collected. These incidents increased the colonists' concerns about the intent of the British Parliament and helped the growing movement that became the American Revolution.

The Radical Whigs were a group of British political commentators associated with the British Whig faction who were at the forefront of the Radical movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loyalist (American Revolution)</span> Colonists loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolution

Loyalists were colonists in the Thirteen Colonies who remained loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolutionary War, often referred to as Tories, Royalists or King's Men at the time. They were opposed by the Patriots, who supported the revolution, and called them "persons inimical to the liberties of America."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patriot (American Revolution)</span> Colonists who opposed British rule during the American Revolution

Patriots, also known as Revolutionaries, Continentals, Rebels, or Whigs, were colonists in the Thirteen Colonies who opposed the Kingdom of Great Britain's control and governance during the colonial era, and supported and helped launch the American Revolution that ultimately established American independence. Patriot politicians led colonial opposition to British policies regarding the American colonies, eventually building support for the adoption of the Declaration of Independence, which was adopted unanimously by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 1776. After the American Revolutionary War began the year before, in 1775, many Patriots assimilated into the Continental Army, which was commanded by George Washington and which secured victory against the British, leading the British to acknowledge the sovereign independence of the colonies, reflected in the Treaty of Paris, which led to the establishment of the United States in 1783.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massachusetts Circular Letter</span> Rodolfo. cabrer

The Massachusetts Circular Letter was a statement written by Samuel Adams and James Otis Jr., and passed by the Massachusetts House of Representatives in February 1768 in response to the Townshend Acts. Reactions to the letter brought heightened tensions between the British Parliament and Massachusetts, and resulted in the military occupation of Boston by the British Army, which contributed to the coming of the American Revolution.

The Commonwealth men, Commonwealthmen, Commonwealth's men, or Commonwealth Party were highly outspoken British Protestant religious, political, and economic reformers during the early 18th century. They were active in the movement called the Country Party. They promoted republicanism and had a great influence on Republicanism in the United States, but little impact in Britain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Montagu (Royal Navy officer)</span> English naval officer and colonial governor (1719–1795)

Admiral John Montagu (1719–1795) was an English naval officer and colonial governor of Newfoundland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxford History of the United States</span> Ongoing multi-volume narrative history of the United States

The Oxford History of the United States is an ongoing multivolume narrative history of the United States published by Oxford University Press. Conceived in the 1950s and launched in 1961 under the co-editorship of historians Richard Hofstadter and C. Vann Woodward, the series has been edited by David M. Kennedy since 1999.

Robert Lawrence Middlekauff was a professor of colonial and early United States history at the University of California, Berkeley.

The 1774 British general election returned members to serve in the House of Commons of the 14th Parliament of Great Britain to be held, after the merger of the Parliament of England and the Parliament of Scotland in 1707. Lord North's government was returned with a large majority. The opposition consisted of factions supporting the Marquess of Rockingham and the Earl of Chatham, both of whom referred to themselves as Whigs. North's opponents referred to his supporters as Tories, but no Tory party existed at the time and his supporters rejected the label.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Confederation period</span> Era of United States history in the 1780s

The Confederation period was the era of the United States' history in the 1780s after the American Revolution and prior to the ratification of the United States Constitution. In 1781, the United States ratified the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union and prevailed in the Battle of Yorktown, the last major land battle between British and American Continental forces in the American Revolutionary War. American independence was confirmed with the 1783 signing of the Treaty of Paris. The fledgling United States faced several challenges, many of which stemmed from the lack of an effective central government and unified political culture. The period ended in 1789 following the ratification of the United States Constitution, which established a new, more effective, federal government.

The Boston Pamphlet was a 1772 pamphlet published in Boston in the American Revolution. Written by members of the Boston Committee of Correspondence, the pamphlet outlined the rights of British American colonists and indicated how recent British policies were in violation of those rights. Although called the "Boston Pamphlet" by contemporaries, it was officially known as The Votes and Proceedings of the Freeholders and other Inhabitants of The Town of Boston, In Town Meeting assembled, According to Law.

<i>Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945</i> 1999 book about America in the Depression and WWII

Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 is a 1999 nonfiction book by the American historian David M. Kennedy. Published as part of the Oxford History of the United States, Freedom from Fear covers the history of the United States during the Great Depression and World War II. It won the 2000 Pulitzer Prize for History.

John Richard Alden was an American historian and author of a number of books on the era of the American Revolutionary War.

<i>Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815</i> 2009 American history book by Gordon S. Wood

Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815 is a nonfiction book written by American historian Gordon S. Wood. Published as a clothbound hardcover in 2009 as part of the Oxford History of the United States series, the book narrates the history of the United States in the first twenty-six years following the ratification of the U. S. Constitution. The history Empire of Liberty tells privileges republicanism and political thought, characterizing the early United States as a time of growing egalitarianism unleashed by the American Revolution. The story involves both Federalists and Jeffersonians. Empire of Liberty tends to sympathize with Jeffersonians.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.