Trabecula

Trabecula
Trabecula
	Alternation of trabecular pattern in the thigh bone reflects mechanical stress
Details
Part of	Bone
Identifiers
FMA	85273
	Anatomical terminology [ edit on Wikidata]

Last updated September 30, 2024

Inside of a bone showing the trabecular structure Bone-inside.jpg — Inside of a bone showing the trabecular structure

A trabecula (pl.: trabeculae, from Latin for 'small beam') is a small, often microscopic, tissue element in the form of a small beam, strut or rod that supports or anchors a framework of parts within a body or organ.^[1]^[2] A trabecula generally has a mechanical function, and is usually composed of dense collagenous tissue (such as the trabecula of the spleen). It can be composed of other material such as muscle and bone. In the heart, muscles form trabeculae carneae and septomarginal trabeculae,^[3] and the left atrial appendage has a tubular trabeculated structure.^[4]

Bone trabecula

Structure

Trabecular bone, also called cancellous bone, is porous bone composed of trabeculated bone tissue. It can be found at the ends of long bones like the femur, where the bone is actually not solid but is full of holes connected by thin rods and plates of bone tissue.^[5] The holes (the volume not directly occupied by bone trabecula) is the intertrabecular space, and is occupied by red bone marrow, where all the blood cells are made, as well as fibrous tissue. Even though trabecular bone contains a lot of intertrabecular space, its spatial complexity contributes the maximal strength with minimum mass. It is noted that the form and structure of trabecular bone are organized to optimally resist loads imposed by functional activities, like jumping, running and squatting. And according to Wolff's law, proposed in 1892, the external shape and internal architecture of bone are determined by external stresses acting on it.^[6] The internal structure of the trabecular bone firstly undergoes adaptive changes along stress direction and then the external shape of cortical bone undergoes secondary changes. Finally bone structure becomes thicker and denser to resist external loading.

Because of the increased occurrence of total joint replacement and its impact on bone remodeling, understanding the stress-related and adaptive process of trabecular bone has become a central concern for bone physiologists. To understand the role of trabecular bone in age-related bone structure and in the design for bone-implant systems, it is important to study the mechanical properties of trabecular bone as a function of variables such as anatomic site, bone density, and age related issues. Mechanical factors including modulus, uniaxial strength, and fatigue properties must be taken into account.

Typically, the porosity percent of trabecular bone is in the range 75–95% and the density ranges from 0.2 to 0.8 g/cm³.^[7] It is noted that the porosity can reduce the strength of the bone, but also reduce its weight. The porosity and the manner that porosity is structured affect the strength of material. Thus, the micro structure of trabecular bone is typically oriented and ''grain'' of porosity is aligned in a direction at which mechanical stiffness and strength are greatest. Because of the microstructural directionality, the mechanical properties of trabecular bone are highly anisotropic. The range of Young's modulus for trabecular bone is 800 to 14,000 MPa and the strength of failure is 1 to 100 MPa.

As mentioned above, the mechanical properties of trabecular bone are very sensitive to apparent density. The relationship between modulus of trabecular bone and its apparent density was demonstrated by Carter and Hayes in 1976.^[8] The resulting equation states:

$E=a+b\cdot \rho ^{c}$

where $E$ represents the modulus of trabecular bone in any loading direction, $\rho$ represents the apparent density, and $a,$ $b,$ and $c$ are constants depending on the architecture of tissue.

Using scanning electron microscopy, it was found that the variation in trabecular architecture with different anatomic sites lead to different modulus. To understand structure-anisotropy and material property relations, one must correlate the measured mechanical properties of anisotropic trabecular specimens with the stereological descriptions of their architecture.^[6]

The compressive strength of trabecular bone is also very important because it is believed that the inside failure of trabecular bone arise from compressive stress. On the stress-strain curves for both trabecular bone and cortical bone with different apparent density, there are three stages in stress-strain curve. The first is the linear region where individual trabecula bend and compress as the bulk tissue is compressed.^[6] The second stage occurs after yielding, where trabecular bonds start to fracture, and the final stage is the stiffening stage. Typically, lower density trabecular areas offer more deformed staging before stiffening than higher density specimens.^[6]

In summary, trabecular bone is very compliant and heterogeneous. The heterogeneous character makes it difficult to summarize the general mechanical properties for trabecular bone. High porosity makes trabecular bone compliant and large variations in architecture leads to high heterogeneity. The modulus and strength vary inversely with porosity and are highly dependent on the porosity structure. The effects of aging and small cracking of trabecular bone on its mechanical properties are a source of further study.

Clinical significance

Studies have shown that once a human reaches adulthood, bone density steadily decreases with age, to which loss of trabecular bone mass is a partial contributor.^[9] Loss of bone mass is defined by the World Health Organization as osteopenia if bone mineral density (BMD) is one standard deviation below mean BMD in young adults, and is defined as osteoporosis if it is more than 2.5 standard deviations below the mean.^[10] A low bone density greatly increases risk for stress fracture, which can occur without warning.^[11] The resulting low-impact fractures from osteoporosis most commonly occur in the upper femur, which consists of 25-50% trabecular bone depending on the region, in the vertebrae, which are about 90% trabecular, or in the wrist.^[12]

When trabecular bone volume decreases, its original plate-and-rod structure is disturbed; plate-like structures are converted to rod-like structures and pre-existing rod-like structures thin until they disconnect and resorb into the body.^[12] Changes in trabecular bone are typically gender-specific, with the most notable differences in bone mass and trabecular microstructure occurring within the age range for menopause.^[9] Trabeculae degradation over time causes a decrease in bone strength that is disproportionately large in comparison to volume of trabecular bone loss, leaving the remaining bone vulnerable to fracture.^[12]

With osteoporosis there are often also symptoms of osteoarthritis, which occurs when cartilage in joints is under excessive stress and degrades over time, causing stiffness, pain, and loss of movement.^[13] With osteoarthritis, the underlying bone plays a significant role in cartilage degradation. Thus any trabecular degradation can significantly affect stress distribution and adversely affect the cartilage in question.^[14]

Due to its strong effect on overall bone strength,^[15] there is currently strong speculation that analysis in patterns of trabeculae degradation may be useful in the near future in tracking the progression of osteoporosis.^[16]

Birds

The hollow design of bird bones is multifunctional. It establishes high specific strength and supplements open airways to accommodate the skeletal pneumaticity common to many birds. The specific strength and resistance to buckling is optimized through a bone design that combines a thin, hard shell that encases a spongy core of trabeculae.^[17] The allometry of the trabeculae allows the skeleton to tolerate loads without significantly increasing the bone mass.^[18] The red-tailed hawk optimizes its weight with a repeating pattern of V-shaped struts that give the bones the necessary lightweight and stiff characteristics. The inner network of trabeculae shifts mass away from the neutral axis, which ultimately increases the resistance to buckling.^[17]

As in humans, the distribution of trabeculae in bird species is uneven and is dependent on load conditions. The bird with the highest density of trabeculae is the kiwi, a flightless bird.^[18] There is also uneven distribution of trabeculae within similar species such as the great spotted woodpecker or grey-headed woodpecker. After examining a microCT scan of the woodpecker's forehead, temporomandibulum, and occiput it was determined that there is significantly more trabeculae in the forehead and occiput.^[19] Besides the difference in distribution, the aspect ratio of the individual struts was higher in woodpeckers than in other birds of similar size such as the Eurasian hoopoe ^[19] or the lark.^[20] The woodpeckers' trabeculae are more plate-like while the hawk and lark have rod-like structures networked through their bones. The decrease in strain on the woodpecker's brain has been attributed to the higher quantity of thicker plate-like struts packed more closely together than the hawk or hoopoe or the lark.^[20] Conversely, the thinner rod-like structures would lead to greater deformation. A destructive mechanical test with 12 samples show the woodpecker's trabeculae design has an average ultimate strength of 6.38MPa, compared to the lark's 0.55MPa.^[19]

Woodpeckers' beaks have tiny struts supporting the shell of the beak, but to a lesser extent compared to the skull. As a result of fewer trabeculae in the beak, the beak has a higher stiffness (1.0 GPa) compared to the skull (0.31 GPa). While the beak absorbs some of the impact from pecking, most of the impact is transferred to the skull where more trabeculae are actively available to absorb the shock. The ultimate strength of woodpeckers' and larks' beaks are similar, inferring the beak has a lesser role in impact absorption.^[20] One measured advantage of the woodpecker's beak is the slight overbite (upper beak is 1.6mm longer than lower beak) which offers a bimodal distribution of force due to the asymmetric surface contact. The staggered timing of impact induces a lower strain on the trabeculae in the forehead, occiput, and beak.^[21]

Trabecula in other organisms

The larger the animal, the higher the load forces on its bones. Trabecular bone increases stiffness by increasing the amount of bone per unit volume or by altering the geometry and arrangement of individual trabeculae as body size and bone loading increases. Trabecular bone scales allometrically, reorganizing the bones' internal structure to increase the ability of the skeleton to sustain loads experienced by the trabeculae. Furthermore, scaling of trabecular geometry can moderate trabecular strain. Load acts as a stimulus to the trabecular, changing its geometry so as to sustain or mitigate strain loads. By using finite element modelling, a study tested four different species under an equal apparent stress (σapp) to show that trabecular scaling in animals alters the strain within the trabecular. It was observed that the strain within trabeculae from each species varied with the geometry of the trabeculae. From a scale of tens of micrometers, which is approximately the size of osteocytes, the figure below shows that thicker trabeculae exhibited less strain. The relative frequency distributions of element strain experienced by each species shows a higher elastic moduli of the trabeculae as the species size increases.

Additionally, trabeculae in larger animals are thicker, further apart, and less densely connected than those in smaller animals. Intra-trabecular osteon can commonly be found in thick trabeculae of larger animals, as well as thinner trabeculae of smaller animals such as cheetah and lemurs. The osteons play a role in the diffusion of nutrients and waste products of osteocytes by regulating the distance between osteocytes and bone surface to approximately 230 μm.

Due to an increased reduction of blood oxygen saturation, animals with high metabolic demands tend to have a lower trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) because they require increased vascular perfusion of trabeculae. The vascularization by tunneling osteons changes the trabecular geometry from solid to tube-like, increasing bending stiffness for individual trabeculae and sustaining blood supply to deep tissue osteocytes.

Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) was found to be relatively constant for the variety of animal sizes tested. Larger animals did not show a significantly larger mass per unit volume of trabecular bone. This may be due to an adaptation which reduces the physiological cost of producing, maintaining, and moving tissue. However, BV/TV showed significant positive scaling in avian femoral condyles. Larger birds present decreased flight habits due to avian BV/TV allometry. The flightless kiwi, weighing only 1–2 kg, had the greatest BV/TV of the birds tested in the study. This shows that trabecular bone geometry is related to ‘prevailing mechanical conditions’, so the differences in trabecular geometry in the femoral head and condyle could be attributed to different loading environments of coxofemoral and femorotibial joints.

The woodpecker's ability to resist repetitive head impact is correlated with its unique micro/nano-hierarchical composite structures.^[20] Microstructure and nanostructure of the woodpecker's skull consists of an uneven distribution of spongy bone, the organizational shape of individual trabeculae. This affects the woodpecker's mechanical properties, allowing the cranial bone to withstand a high ultimate strength (σu). Compared to the cranial bone of the lark, the woodpecker's cranial bone is denser and less spongy, having a more plate-like structure rather than the more rod-like structure observed in larks. Furthermore, the woodpecker's cranial bone is thicker and more individual trabeculae. Relative to the trabeculae in lark, the woodpecker's trabecular is more closely spaced and more plate-like. [19] These properties result in higher ultimate strength in the cranial bone of the woodpecker.

History

The diminutive form of Latin trabs, means a beam or bar. In the 19th century, the neologism trabeculum (with an assumed plural of trabecula) became popular, but is less etymologically correct. Trabeculum persists in some countries as a synonym for the trabecular meshwork of the eye, but this can be considered poor usage on the grounds of both etymology and descriptive accuracy.

Other uses

For the skull development component, see trabecular cartilage.

Related Research Articles

A bone is a rigid organ that constitutes part of the skeleton in most vertebrate animals. Bones protect the various other organs of the body, produce red and white blood cells, store minerals, provide structure and support for the body, and enable mobility. Bones come in a variety of shapes and sizes and have complex internal and external structures. They are lightweight yet strong and hard and serve multiple functions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Osteoporosis</span> Skeletal disorder

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by low bone mass, micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue leading to more porous bone, and consequent increase in fracture risk.

Cartilage is a resilient and smooth type of connective tissue. Semi-transparent and non-porous, it is usually covered by a tough and fibrous membrane called perichondrium. In tetrapods, it covers and protects the ends of long bones at the joints as articular cartilage, and is a structural component of many body parts including the rib cage, the neck and the bronchial tubes, and the intervertebral discs. In other taxa, such as chondrichthyans and cyclostomes, it constitutes a much greater proportion of the skeleton. It is not as hard and rigid as bone, but it is much stiffer and much less flexible than muscle. The matrix of cartilage is made up of glycosaminoglycans, proteoglycans, collagen fibers and, sometimes, elastin. It usually grows quicker than bone.

Young's modulus is a mechanical property of solid materials that measures the tensile or compressive stiffness when the force is applied lengthwise. It is the modulus of elasticity for tension or axial compression. Young's modulus is defined as the ratio of the stress applied to the object and the resulting axial strain in the linear elastic region of the material.

In physics and materials science, elasticity is the ability of a body to resist a distorting influence and to return to its original size and shape when that influence or force is removed. Solid objects will deform when adequate loads are applied to them; if the material is elastic, the object will return to its initial shape and size after removal. This is in contrast to plasticity, in which the object fails to do so and instead remains in its deformed state.

The field of strength of materials typically refers to various methods of calculating the stresses and strains in structural members, such as beams, columns, and shafts. The methods employed to predict the response of a structure under loading and its susceptibility to various failure modes takes into account the properties of the materials such as its yield strength, ultimate strength, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio. In addition, the mechanical element's macroscopic properties such as its length, width, thickness, boundary constraints and abrupt changes in geometry such as holes are considered.

An elastic modulus is the unit of measurement of an object's or substance's resistance to being deformed elastically when a stress is applied to it.

An osteocyte, an oblate shaped type of bone cell with dendritic processes, is the most commonly found cell in mature bone. It can live as long as the organism itself. The adult human body has about 42 billion of them. Osteocytes do not divide and have an average half life of 25 years. They are derived from osteoprogenitor cells, some of which differentiate into active osteoblasts. Osteoblasts/osteocytes develop in mesenchyme.

An implant is a medical device manufactured to replace a missing biological structure, support a damaged biological structure, or enhance an existing biological structure. For example, an implant may be a rod, used to strengthen weak bones. Medical implants are human-made devices, in contrast to a transplant, which is a transplanted biomedical tissue. The surface of implants that contact the body might be made of a biomedical material such as titanium, silicone, or apatite depending on what is the most functional. In 2018, for example, American Elements developed a nickel alloy powder for 3D printing robust, long-lasting, and biocompatible medical implants. In some cases implants contain electronics, e.g. artificial pacemaker and cochlear implants. Some implants are bioactive, such as subcutaneous drug delivery devices in the form of implantable pills or drug-eluting stents.

The trabeculae carneae are rounded or irregular muscular columns which project from the inner surface of the right and left ventricle of the heart. These are different from the pectinate muscles, which are present in the atria of the heart. In development, trabeculae carneae are among the first of the cardiac structures to develop in the embryonic cardiac tube. Further, throughout development some trabeculae carneae condense to form the myocardium, papillary muscles, chordae tendineae, and septum.

Davis's law is used in anatomy and physiology to describe how soft tissue models along imposed demands. It is similar to Wolff's law, which applies to osseous tissue. It is a physiological principle stating that soft tissue heal according to the manner in which they are mechanically stressed.

Honeycomb structures are natural or man-made structures that have the geometry of a honeycomb to allow the minimization of the amount of used material to reach minimal weight and minimal material cost. The geometry of honeycomb structures can vary widely but the common feature of all such structures is an array of hollow cells formed between thin vertical walls. The cells are often columnar and hexagonal in shape. A honeycomb-shaped structure provides a material with minimal density and relative high out-of-plane compression properties and out-of-plane shear properties.

The Mechanostat is a term describing the way in which mechanical loading influences bone structure by changing the mass and architecture to provide a structure that resists habitual loads with an economical amount of material. As changes in the skeleton are accomplished by the processes of formation and resorption, the mechanostat models the effect of influences on the skeleton by those processes, through their effector cells, osteocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts. The term was invented by Harold Frost: an orthopaedic surgeon and researcher described extensively in articles referring to Frost and Webster Jee's Utah Paradigm of Skeletal Physiology in the 1960s. The Mechanostat is often defined as a practical description of Wolff's law described by Julius Wolff (1836–1902), but this is not completely accurate. Wolff wrote his treatises on bone after images of bone sections were described by Culmann and von Meyer, who suggested that the arrangement of the struts (trabeculae) at the ends of the bones were aligned with the stresses experienced by the bone. It has since been established that the static methods used for those calculations of lines of stress were inappropriate for work on what were, in effect, curved beams, a finding described by Lance Lanyon, a leading researcher in the area as "a triumph of a good idea over mathematics." While Wolff pulled together the work of Culmann and von Meyer, it was the French scientist Roux, who first used the term "functional adaptation" to describe the way that the skeleton optimized itself for its function, though Wolff is credited by many for that.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artificial bone</span> Bone-like material

Artificial bone refers to bone-like material created in a laboratory that can be used in bone grafts, to replace human bone that was lost due to severe fractures, disease, etc.

Wolff's law, developed by the German anatomist and surgeon Julius Wolff (1836–1902) in the 19th century, states that bone in a healthy animal will adapt to the loads under which it is placed. If loading on a particular bone increases, the bone will remodel itself over time to become stronger to resist that sort of loading. The internal architecture of the trabeculae undergoes adaptive changes, followed by secondary changes to the external cortical portion of the bone, perhaps becoming thicker as a result. The inverse is true as well: if the loading on a bone decreases, the bone will become less dense and weaker due to the lack of the stimulus required for continued remodeling. This reduction in bone density (osteopenia) is known as stress shielding and can occur as a result of a hip replacement. The normal stress on a bone is shielded from that bone by being placed on a prosthetic implant.

The trabecular bone score is a measure of bone texture correlated with bone microarchitecture and a marker for the risk of osteoporosis. Introduced in 2008, its main projected use is alongside measures of bone density in better predicting fracture risk in people with metabolic bone problems.

Materials that are used for biomedical or clinical applications are known as biomaterials. The following article deals with fifth generation biomaterials that are used for bone structure replacement. For any material to be classified for biomedical applications, three requirements must be met. The first requirement is that the material must be biocompatible; it means that the organism should not treat it as a foreign object. Secondly, the material should be biodegradable ; the material should harmlessly degrade or dissolve in the body of the organism to allow it to resume natural functioning. Thirdly, the material should be mechanically sound; for the replacement of load-bearing structures, the material should possess equivalent or greater mechanical stability to ensure high reliability of the graft.

Polymer gradient materials (PGM) are a class of polymers with gradually changing mechanical properties along a defined direction creating an anisotropic material. These materials can be defined based upon the direction and the steepness of the gradient used and can display gradient or graded transitions. A wide range of methods can be used to create these gradients including gradients in reinforcing fillers, cross-link density or porosity to name a few. 3D printing has been used to combine several of these methods in one manufacturing technique.

Titanium foams exhibit high specific strength, high energy absorption, excellent corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. These materials are ideally suited for applications within the aerospace industry. An inherent resistance to corrosion allows the foam to be a desirable candidate for various filtering applications. Further, titanium's physiological inertness makes its porous form a promising candidate for biomedical implantation devices. The largest advantage in fabricating titanium foams is that the mechanical and functional properties can be adjusted through manufacturing manipulations that vary porosity and cell morphology. The high appeal of titanium foams is directly correlated to a multi-industry demand for advancement in this technology.

The beak of the toco toucan is integral to their vital social, feeding, foraging, and nest building behaviors. Since the toucan beak does not fully regenerate, it is evolutionarily favorable for it to have robust mechanical properties while still being light enough to allow flight. The beak makes up one-third of the toucan's body length, while contributing to less than three percent of the toucan's weight. The beak structure largely influences its mechanical properties and the lifestyle of the toucan. The beak's properties are increasingly becoming popular in the realm of biomimicry as several industries such as architecture, transportation, and protective equipment can utilize trends of the biological beak structure in manmade designs.

References

↑ "Definition of TRABECULA". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 2017-09-24.
↑ "trabecula". The Free Dictionary.
↑ Goo, Soyeon; Joshi, Purva; Sands, Greg; Gerneke, Dane; Taberner, Andrew; Dollie, Qaasim; LeGrice, Ian; Loiselle, Denis (October 2009). "Trabeculae carneae as models of the ventricular walls: implications for the delivery of oxygen" (PDF). The Journal of General Physiology. 134 (4): 339–350. doi:10.1085/jgp.200910276. ISSN 0022-1295. PMC 2757768 . PMID 19752188.
↑ Srivastava MC, See VY, Price MJ (2015). "A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience". Springerplus . 4: 522. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8 . PMC 4574041 . PMID 26405642.
↑ "Trabeculae of Bone: Definition & Function". Study.com. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
1 2 3 4 Hayes, Wilson C.; Keaveny, Tony M. (1993). Bone: A Treatise (7 ed.). CRC Press. pp. 285–344. ISBN 978-0849388279 . Retrieved 31 March 2017.
↑ Meyers, M. A.; Chen, P.-Y. (2014). Biological Materials Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-01045-1.
↑ Carter, D. R.; Hayes, W. C. (1976-12-10). "Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate". Science. 194 (4270): 1174–1176. Bibcode:1976Sci...194.1174C. doi:10.1126/science.996549. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 996549.
1 2 Parkinson, Ian H.; Fazzalari, Nicola L. (12 January 2012). Characterisation of Trabecular Bone Structure. Adelaide, SA, Australia: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 31–51. ISBN 9783642180521 . Retrieved 31 March 2017.
↑ "World Health Organization – WHO Criteria for Diagnosis of Osteoporosis". 4BoneHealth. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
↑ "Stress Fractures of the Foot and Ankle-OrthoInfo - AAOS". orthoinfo.aaos.org. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
1 2 3 Wehrli, Felix W. "Role of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Architecture in Osteoporosis" (PDF). University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
↑ Haq, I.; Murphy, E.; Dacre, J. (1 July 2003). "Osteoarthritis". Postgraduate Medical Journal. 79 (933): 377–383. doi:10.1136/pmj.79.933.377. ISSN 0032-5473. PMC 1742743 . PMID 12897215.
↑ Lorna, Gibson. "Lecture 11: Trabecular Bone and Osteoporosis | Video Lectures | Cellular Solids: Structure, Properties and Applications | Materials Science and Engineering | MIT OpenCourseWare". ocw.mit.edu. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
↑ Taghizadeh, Elham; Chandran, Vimal; Reyes, Mauricio; Zysset, Philippe; Büchler, Philippe (2017). "Statistical analysis of the inter-individual variations of the bone shape, volume fraction and fabric and their correlations in the proximal femur". Bone. 103: 252–261. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.012. PMID 28732775.
↑ Shetty, Aditya. "Trabecular pattern of proximal femur | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org". radiopaedia.org. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
1 2 Meyers, M. A.; Chen, P.-Y. (2014). Biological Materials Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 504–506. ISBN 978-1-107-01045-1.
1 2 Doube, Michael; et al. (2011). "Trabecular bone scales allometrically in mammals and birds". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 278 (1721): 3067–3073. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0069. PMC 3158937 . PMID 21389033.
1 2 3 Wang, Lizheng; et al. (2013). "Effect of Microstructure of Spongy Bone in Different Parts of Woodpecker's Skull on Resistance to Impact Injury". Journal of Nanomaterials. 2013: 1–6. doi: 10.1155/2013/924564 . hdl: 10397/31085 .
1 2 3 4 Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Fan, Y. (2011). "Comparative study of the mechanical properties, micro-structure, and composition of the cranial and beak bones of the great spotted woodpecker and the lark bird". Science China Life Sciences. 54 (11): 1036–1041. doi: 10.1007/s11427-011-4242-2 . PMID 22173310.
↑ Wang, Lizheng; Cheung, Jason Tak-Man; Pu, Fang; Li, Deyu; Zhang, Ming; Fan, Yubo (2011). "Why Do Woodpecker's Resist Head Impact Energy: A Biomechanical Investigation". PLOS One . 6 (10): e26490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026490 . PMC 3202538 . PMID 22046293.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] "Definition of TRABECULA". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 2017-09-24.

[2] "trabecula". The Free Dictionary.

[3] Goo, Soyeon; Joshi, Purva; Sands, Greg; Gerneke, Dane; Taberner, Andrew; Dollie, Qaasim; LeGrice, Ian; Loiselle, Denis (October 2009). "Trabeculae carneae as models of the ventricular walls: implications for the delivery of oxygen" (PDF). The Journal of General Physiology. 134 (4): 339–350. doi:10.1085/jgp.200910276. ISSN 0022-1295. PMC 2757768 . PMID 19752188.

[pmid26405642-4] Srivastava MC, See VY, Price MJ (2015). "A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience". Springerplus . 4: 522. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8 . PMC 4574041 . PMID 26405642.

[Trabeculae_of_Bone:_Definition_&_Function-5] "Trabeculae of Bone: Definition & Function". Study.com. Retrieved 31 March 2017.

[“Mechanical_properties_of_cortical_and_trabecular_bone”-6] 1 2 3 4 Hayes, Wilson C.; Keaveny, Tony M. (1993). Bone: A Treatise (7 ed.). CRC Press. pp. 285–344. ISBN 978-0849388279 . Retrieved 31 March 2017.

[Biological_Materials_Science-7] Meyers, M. A.; Chen, P.-Y. (2014). Biological Materials Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-01045-1.

[8] Carter, D. R.; Hayes, W. C. (1976-12-10). "Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate". Science. 194 (4270): 1174–1176. Bibcode:1976Sci...194.1174C. doi:10.1126/science.996549. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 996549.

[Characterisation_of_Trabecular_Bone_Structure-9] 1 2 Parkinson, Ian H.; Fazzalari, Nicola L. (12 January 2012). Characterisation of Trabecular Bone Structure. Adelaide, SA, Australia: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 31–51. ISBN 9783642180521 . Retrieved 31 March 2017.

[4BoneHealth-10] "World Health Organization – WHO Criteria for Diagnosis of Osteoporosis". 4BoneHealth. Retrieved 31 March 2017.

[11] "Stress Fractures of the Foot and Ankle-OrthoInfo - AAOS". orthoinfo.aaos.org. Retrieved 31 March 2017.

[UPenn-12] 1 2 3 Wehrli, Felix W. "Role of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Architecture in Osteoporosis" (PDF). University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. Retrieved 31 March 2017.

[Osteoarthritis-13] Haq, I.; Murphy, E.; Dacre, J. (1 July 2003). "Osteoarthritis". Postgraduate Medical Journal. 79 (933): 377–383. doi:10.1136/pmj.79.933.377. ISSN 0032-5473. PMC 1742743 . PMID 12897215.

[MIT-14] Lorna, Gibson. "Lecture 11: Trabecular Bone and Osteoporosis | Video Lectures | Cellular Solids: Structure, Properties and Applications | Materials Science and Engineering | MIT OpenCourseWare". ocw.mit.edu. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 31 March 2017.

[15] Taghizadeh, Elham; Chandran, Vimal; Reyes, Mauricio; Zysset, Philippe; Büchler, Philippe (2017). "Statistical analysis of the inter-individual variations of the bone shape, volume fraction and fabric and their correlations in the proximal femur". Bone. 103: 252–261. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.012. PMID 28732775.

[Radiopaedia-16] Shetty, Aditya. "Trabecular pattern of proximal femur | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org". radiopaedia.org. Retrieved 31 March 2017.

[Marc_Meyers_2014,_p._504-506-17] 1 2 Meyers, M. A.; Chen, P.-Y. (2014). Biological Materials Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 504–506. ISBN 978-1-107-01045-1.

[ReferenceA-18] 1 2 Doube, Michael; et al. (2011). "Trabecular bone scales allometrically in mammals and birds". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 278 (1721): 3067–3073. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0069. PMC 3158937 . PMID 21389033.

[ReferenceB-19] 1 2 3 Wang, Lizheng; et al. (2013). "Effect of Microstructure of Spongy Bone in Different Parts of Woodpecker's Skull on Resistance to Impact Injury". Journal of Nanomaterials. 2013: 1–6. doi: 10.1155/2013/924564 . hdl: 10397/31085 .

[ReferenceC-20] 1 2 3 4 Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Fan, Y. (2011). "Comparative study of the mechanical properties, micro-structure, and composition of the cranial and beak bones of the great spotted woodpecker and the lark bird". Science China Life Sciences. 54 (11): 1036–1041. doi: 10.1007/s11427-011-4242-2 . PMID 22173310.

[Why_Do_Woodpecker's_Resist_Head_Impact_Energy-21] Wang, Lizheng; Cheung, Jason Tak-Man; Pu, Fang; Li, Deyu; Zhang, Ming; Fan, Yubo (2011). "Why Do Woodpecker's Resist Head Impact Energy: A Biomechanical Investigation". PLOS One . 6 (10): e26490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026490 . PMC 3202538 . PMID 22046293.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]