Trajan's First Dacian War

Last updated
First Dacian War
Part of the Dacian Wars
Traj col battle 5.jpg
scene on Trajan's Column, possibly describing a battle between legionaries and Dacians
Date101 to 102
Location
Dacia
Result Dacians surrender
Territorial
changes		 Territories near Danube River ceded to Rome
Belligerents
Roman Empire Dacian Draco.svg Dacian Kingdom
Commanders and leaders
Trajan Decebalus
Invasion routes of Trajan 101-102 Campagna dacica Traiano 101-102 png.png
Invasion routes of Trajan 101-102

Trajan's First Dacian War took place from 101 to 102.

Contents

The Kingdom of Dacia, under King Decebalus, had become a threat to the Roman Empire, and defeated several of Rome's armies during Domitian's reign (81–96). Despite the peace treaty established after Domitian's Dacian War, Trajan was set on ridding their new threat to Rome's power and in 101 set out determined to defeat Dacia. After a year of heavy fighting, King Decebalus came to terms and accepted peace.

The War

101

After support from the Roman Senate, by 101, Trajan was ready to advance on Dacia.

Beside the nine Roman legions that were already stationed on the Danube frontier, Trajan brought two more, Legio X Gemina and Legio XI Claudia, and created two new legions, Legio II Traiana Fortis and Legio XXX Ulpia Victrix.

Trajan had built the canal that diverted the course of the Danube in the vicinity of the Drobeta crossing, flanked by a military road, along the narrow Iron Gates gorge in 101 or the previous year.

Trajan left Italy in 101 [1] and went via Ancona and Iader to head probably to Viminacium in the province of Moesia Superior.

He was accompanied by the Praetorian Guard and his praetorian prefect, Tiberius Claudius Livianus [2] as well as a whole series of comites such as Lucius Licinius Sura, Quintus Sosius Senecio, [3] Lusius Quietus, [4] Gnaeus Pompeius Longinus, [5] Hadrian (the future successor of Trajan, then 25 years old) and perhaps Decimus Terentius Scaurianus (who would later become the first governor of the province of Dacia).

The general strategic plan of the campaign come from the words of Trajan himself: "inde Berzobim, deinde Aizi processimus" (We then advanced to Berzobim, next to Aizi). [6] These two locations were along the westernmost of the roads leading to Dacia which, starting from Viminacium on the Danube near Lederata, led to Tibiscum and then to Tapae and the pass of the so-called Iron Gates (near the current Otelu Rosu), entering Dacia. This road had already been used by Tettius Julianus in the campaign of 88.

The Roman offensive was perhaps spearheaded by two legionary columns, a hypothesis formulated after careful analysis of Trajan's Column where, in scenes 4 and 5, two parallel pontoon bridges over the Danube are depicted, one crossed by the legionaries and the other by the praetorians. The second column from Drobeta (or possibly Dierna) would have crossed the pass known as the Keys of Teregova to reunite with the first column in Tibiscum. [7] The two bridges would constitute a natural expressive means through which the sculptor would have liked to indicate the simultaneous passage of an army divided into two different "marching columns". [8] The use of separate "columns" evidently served to divide the enemy forces at strategic points, with a tactical outflanking maneouvre which was also used during Trajan's Parthian campaign of 115, with a simultaneous advance along the Tigris and the Euphrates.

He slowly made his way into Dacia and after reaching Tibiscum apparently without having sustained any major battles, he camped there waiting to attack the Dacian forts near the mouth of the Iron Gates. Here he engaged in the fierce Third Battle of Tapae with the bulk of the army. The clash, as also illustrated on the Column, [9] was favourable to the Romans but at the cost of great bloodshed, [10] although it was not decisive since Decebalus was able to establish himself within his forts in the area of Orăștie, ready to block access to the capital Sarmizegetusa Regia. Because the winter was near, Trajan decided to wait until spring to continue his offensive.

However, during the winter of 101/102, Decebalus, now blocked in the west, decided to go on the counterattack, aiming above all to open a second front to thus divide the forces of the Roman army. As had already happened in 85, he chose to attack Moesia Inferior, together with his Sarmatian allies the Roxolani (also shown on the Column [11] ). The two armies crossed the river but, despite achieving some initial success, they were kept at bay by the then governor and skilled general, Manius Laberius Maximus, who also managed to capture the sister of the Dacian king, also illustrated the column. Trajan, mindful of the similar action that had taken place over fifteen years earlier during Domitian's Dacian campaigns, had prepared himself well for a similar strategic move by the Dacians. But only with the arrival of the reinforcements, led by Trajan himself (represented on the Column in the act of reaching the front on boats of the Danube fleet), were the Dacians and Roxolani stopped and heavily defeated, [12] perhaps separately:

102

In 102 Trajan's offensive resumed in March with an advance on multiple fronts.

The first "column" crossed the Danube perhaps at Oescus, continued along the Aluta valley until reaching the sufficiently large and accessible pass of the Red Tower. Two other columns advanced probably along the same lines followed the previous year (i.e. through the " Iron Gates " and the Teregova Keys pass). The final meeting point of the three armies was about 20 km north-west of Sarmizegetusa Regia. [16] There the Roman armies converged for an assault and defeated the Dacian army.

Decebalus, shaken by his second defeat and above all by the simultaneous advance along three fronts in a "pincer maneouvre" which saw the imperial troops take possession of numerous Dacian fortresses, increasingly closer to the capital, sent two embassies to the Roman emperor, each with a plea for peace. Trajan refused to listen to the first, but decided to receive the second, composed of numerous Dacian nobles. [17] Following the meeting, the emperor's chief of staff, Lucius Licinius Sura, was sent along with the praetorian prefect, Tiberius Claudius Livianus, to discuss the terms of the possible peace treaty. [18] The conditions offered by the Romans aimed at the unconditional surrender of Decebalus, were however very harsh considering the Dacians had not yet suffered irreparable defeats. The war, therefore, continued.

Trajan had continued his advance and recovered weapons and Roman engineers taken prisoner. Having passed the Red Tower pass before it could be blocked by the enemy, the Romans positioned themselves in the centre of the Carpathian arc, with the main objective of conquering the Dacian capital located further west. Trajan then divided the army into at least three columns, with which he began to besiege the Dacian fortresses of the Orăștie Mountains. One of these columns, led by Lusius Quietus, included Mauretanian knights among its ranks, perhaps identifiable in some tables of the Column.

The Dacian citadels, such as Costești, fell one after the other until even the last one, near present-day Muncel, was destroyed while the Dacian army that rushed in was heavily beaten. [19] The road to Sarmizegetusa Regia was now considered open and the war now won. Decebalus, to spare the capital the horrors of a useless siege, capitulated. This scene is also well depicted on the Column: the ambassadors sent by the Dacian king, once they entered Trajan's military camp (perhaps located near the city of Aquae), prostrate themselves at the feet of the Roman emperor imploring the cessation of hostilities. [20] After some additional conflicts, Trajan, worried by the upcoming cold winter, agreed a peace treaty.

Treaty

The peace conditions imposed by Trajan were extremely harsh for the Dacian king who had to:

"[Decebalus] after appearing before Trajan, prostrated himself on the ground in supplication and threw his weapons to the ground." [23]

A Dacian embassy was sent to Rome to formalise the ratification of the peace treaty by the Senate so as to allow Trajan to leave the headquarters located near Sarmizegetusa Regia at the beginning of the winter of 102 and return to Rome. Here he obtained the deserved triumph and assumed the title of Dacicus from the end of December, while the coins minted at the time celebrate the Dacia victa. Following these events, the entire Danube was reorganised militarily, and the neighbouring province of Pannonia was divided into Superior and Inferior. [24]

Aftermath

Once Dacia was secured, Decebalus received technical and military reinforcement from Trajan in order to create a powerful allied zone against the dangerous possible expeditions from the northern and eastern territories by the already moving migrator people. The resources were instead used to make the Dacian Kingdom a great independent power that would eventually rebel against Roman rule.

When Decebalus broke the term of the peace treaty in 105, the Second Dacian War began.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trajan</span> Roman emperor from AD 98 to 117

Trajan was a Roman emperor from AD 98 to 117, the second of the Five Good Emperors of the Nerva–Antonine dynasty. He was a philanthropic ruler and a successful soldier-emperor who led the Roman Empire to its greatest territorial extent by the time of his death. He was given the title of optimus by the Roman Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">100s (decade)</span> Decade

The 100s was a decade that ran from January 1, AD 100, to December 31, AD 109.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dacia</span> Ancient kingdom in Southeastern Europe (168 BC–106 AD)

Dacia was the land inhabited by the Dacians, its core in Transylvania, stretching to the Danube in the south, the Black Sea in the east, and the Tisza in the west. The Carpathian Mountains were located in the middle of Dacia. It thus roughly corresponds to present-day Romania, as well as parts of Moldova, Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Slovakia, and Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moesia</span> Historical region of the Balkans

Moesia was an ancient region and later Roman province situated in the Balkans south of the Danube River. Moesian Province was first administered by governor of Noricum as 'Civitates of Moesia and Triballia'. It included most of the territory of modern eastern Serbia, Kosovo, north-eastern Albania, northern parts of North Macedonia, Northern Bulgaria, Romanian Dobruja and small parts of Southern Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sarmizegetusa Regia</span> Dacian capital until 2nd century AD

Sarmizegetusa Regia was the capital and the most important military, religious and political centre of the Dacians before the wars with the Roman Empire. Built on top of a 1200 m high mountain, the fortress, consisting of six citadels, was the core of a strategic and defensive system in the Orăștie Mountains.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decebalus</span> King of Dacia (r. 87–106)

Decebalus, sometimes referred to as Diurpaneus, was the last Dacian king. He is famous for fighting three wars, with varying success, against the Roman Empire under two emperors. After raiding south across the Danube, he defeated a Roman invasion in the reign of Domitian, securing a period of independence during which Decebalus consolidated his rule.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burebista</span> 1st-century BC Thracian king of the Getae and Dacians

Burebista was the king of the Getae and Dacian tribes from 82/61 BC to 45/44 BC. He was the first king who successfully unified the tribes of the Dacian kingdom, which comprised the area located between the Danube, Tisza, and Dniester rivers, and modern day Romania and Moldova. In the 7th and 6th centuries BC it became home to the Thracian peoples, including the Getae and the Dacians. From the 4th century to the middle of the 2nd century BC the Dacian peoples were influenced by La Tène Celts who brought new technologies with them into Dacia. Sometime in the 2nd century BC the Dacians expelled the Celts from their lands. Dacians often warred with neighbouring tribes, but the relative isolation of the Dacian peoples in the Carpathian Mountains allowed them to survive and even to thrive. By the 1st century BC the Dacians had become the dominant power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legio II Traiana Fortis</span> Roman legion

Legio II Traiana, was a legion of the Imperial Roman army raised by emperor Trajan, along with XXX Ulpia Victrix, for the campaigns in Dacia. Records of the II Traiana Fortis have been recovered from Egypt dating to the middle of the 5th century. The legion's emblem was the demi-god Hercules.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trajan's Dacian Wars</span> 101–106 AD pair of Roman wars against Dacia

Trajan's Dacian Wars were two military campaigns fought between the Roman Empire and Dacia during Emperor Trajan's rule. The conflicts were triggered by the constant Dacian threat on the Danubian province of Moesia and also by the increasing need for resources of the economy of the Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Third Battle of Tapae</span> Battle between the Roman Empire and the Dacians (101)

The Third Battle of Tapae (101) was the decisive battle of the first of Trajan's Dacian Wars, in which the Roman Emperor defeated the Dacian King Decebalus's army. Other setbacks in the campaign delayed its completion until 102. The battle is most likely the battle-scene depicted on Plate 22 of Trajan's column.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Domitian's Dacian War</span> Conflict between the Roman Empire and the Dacia (86-88 AD)

Domitian's Dacian War was a conflict between the Roman Empire and the Dacian Kingdom, which had invaded the province of Moesia. The war occurred during the reign of the Roman emperor Domitian, in the years 86–88 AD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Adamclisi</span> Battle beyween the Roman Empire and the Dacians (101/102)

The Battle of Adamclisi was a major clash during the Dacian Wars, fought in the winter of 101 to 102 between the Roman Empire and the Dacians near Adamclisi, in modern Romania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trajan's Second Dacian War</span> Conflict between the Romans and the Dacians (105-106)

Trajan's Second Dacian War was fought between 105 and 106 because the Dacian king, Decebalus, had broken his peace terms with the Roman Emperor Trajan from the Trajan's First Dacian War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa</span> Ancient Roman city in Dacia

Colonia Ulpia Traiana Augusta Dacica Sarmizegetusa was the capital and the largest city of Roman Dacia, later named Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa after the former Dacian capital, located some 30 km away. Possibly built over a camp of the Fifth Macedonian Legion in about 106 AD, the city was settled by veterans and colonists from Italian peninsula. From the very beginning it received the title of colonia and the status of ius Italicum. The urban centre and the civil settlement occupied an area of over 130 hectares, with a population reaching between 20,000 and 25,000 at the end of the 2nd century beginning of the 3rd. The centre built in a Hippodamian Plan was surrounded by strong fortifications over 32.4 hectares.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dacian warfare</span> Historical overview article

The history of Dacian warfare spans from c. 10th century BC up to the 2nd century AD in the region defined by Ancient Greek and Latin historians as Dacia, populated by a collection of Thracian, Ionian, and Dorian tribes. It concerns the armed conflicts of the Dacian tribes and their kingdoms in the Balkans. Apart from conflicts between Dacians and neighboring nations and tribes, numerous wars were recorded among Dacians too.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Sarmizegetusa</span> Roman siege of Sarmizegetusa, the capital of Dacia (106)

The Battle of Sarmizegetusa was a siege of Sarmizegetusa, the capital of Dacia, fought in Trajan's Second Dacian War in 106 between the army of the Roman Emperor Trajan, and the Dacians led by King Decebalus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Dacia</span> Roman province (106–271/275)


Roman Dacia was a province of the Roman Empire from 106 to 271–275 AD. Its territory consisted of what are now the regions of Oltenia, Transylvania and Banat. During Roman rule, it was organized as an imperial province on the borders of the empire. It is estimated that the population of Roman Dacia ranged from 650,000 to 1,200,000. It was conquered by Trajan (98–117) after two campaigns that devastated the Dacian Kingdom of Decebalus. However, the Romans did not occupy its entirety; Crișana, Maramureș, and most of Moldavia remained under the Free Dacians.

This section of the timeline of Romanian history concerns events from Late Neolithic until Late Antiquity, which took place in or are directly related with the territory of modern Romania.

The history of Dacia comprises the events surrounding the historical region roughly corresponding to the present territory of Romania and Moldova and inhabited by the Getae and Dacian peoples, with its capital Sarmizegetusa Regia.

The Second Battle of Tapae in 88 AD was the decisive battle of Domitian's Dacian War, in which the Roman Emperor defeated the Dacian King Decebalus's army in Tapae.

References

  1. ↑ Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae, Dessau 5035
  2. ↑ Cassius Dio, LVIII, 9.2
  3. ↑ CIL VI, 1444
  4. ↑ Cassius Dio, LVIII, 8.3
  5. ↑ Julian Bennet, Trajan, Optimus Princeps, Bloomington, 2001, ISBN 0-253-21435-1. p88
  6. ↑ Prisciano di Cesarea, Institutio de arte grammatica, VI, 13.
  7. ↑ Julian Bennet, Trajan, Optimus Princeps, Bloomington, 2001, ISBN 0-253-21435-1. p93
  8. ↑ Filippo Coarelli, La Colonna Traiana, Roma, 1999, ISBN 88-86359-34-9. tav. 5 (VI-VII/IV-V) p. 49
  9. ↑ Filippo Coarelli, La Colonna Traiana, Roma, 1999, ISBN 88-86359-34-9. tavv. 22-25 (XVIII-XX/XXIV-XXV) pp. 66-69.
  10. ↑ Cassius Dio, Storia romana, LVIII, 8, 2
  11. ↑ Filippo Coarelli, La Colonna Traiana, Roma, 1999, ISBN 88-86359-34-9. tav. 38 (XXVIII/XXXVII-XXXVIII) p. 82.
  12. ↑ AE 1991, 1450, 1937
  13. ↑ Patrick Le Roux, Le Haut-Empire romain en Occident, d'Auguste aux Sévères, Seuil, 1998, p. 73
  14. ↑ Giordane, De origine actibusque Getarum, 18.
  15. ↑ Ammiano Marcellino, Storie, XXXI, 5
  16. ↑ Julian Bennet, Trajan, Optimus Princeps, Bloomington, 2001, ISBN 0-253-21435-1. p84
  17. ↑ Cassius Dio, LVIII, 8, 3.
  18. ↑ >Cassius Dio LVIII, 9, 1-2
  19. ↑ Conrad Cichorius, Die Reliefs der Traiansäule, Berlino, G. Reimer, 1896., Scene LXXI-LXXIII
  20. ↑ Cassius Dio, LVIII, 9, 5-7
  21. ↑ Cassius Dio, LXVIII, 9, 5
  22. ↑ Hadrian Daicoviciu, Lo stato dacico, in I Daci: mostra della civiltà daco-getica in epoca classica, Roma, dicembre 1979-gennaio 1980, p. 33; Condurachi e Daicoviciu, p. 103
  23. ↑ Cassius Dio, LXVIII, 9, 6.
  24. ↑ Denés Gabler, Traiano e la Pannonia, in Traiano ai confini dell'impero, a cura di Grigore Arbore Popescu, Milano, 1998, ISBN 88-435-6676-8.p. 84.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.