PM CARES Fund

Last updated

PM CARES Fund
Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund
Formation27 March 2020;4 years ago (2020-03-27)
Headquarters Prime Minister's Office, South Block, New Delhi
Members
Chairman
K. T. Thomas, Kariya Munda, Ratan Tata
Website pmcares.gov.in

The Prime Minister's Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund (PM CARES Fund) was created on 27 March 2020, following the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Although it is named for the Prime Minister of India, and uses the State Emblem of India, it is a private fund, used at the discretion of the Prime Minister and the Fund's trustees, and does not form a part of the Government of India's accounts. [1] The Fund was established for the purpose of redressing the COVID-19 pandemic in India, in 2020. [2] [3] [4] While complete documentation for the Fund's establishment has not been made public, the Government of India has stated that the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, is the chairman of the fund, and that trustees include the Minister of Defence, Rajnath Singh; the Minister of Home Affairs, Amit Shah, the Minister of Finance, Nirmala Sitharaman, and several corporate leaders and industrialists, including Ratan Tata, and Sudha Murty. [5]

Contents

The total amount of funds donated and the names of donors have not been publicly disclosed, and the fund is privately audited. It is not subject to audits by India's Comptroller and Auditor General, [6] and the Government of India has denied access to documentation involving the fund under India's transparency law, the Right to Information Act, arguing that it is not a government fund and consequently not liable to disclose either earnings or spendings. [7] [8] [9] [10] The Fund has collected financing through public donations from Indian citizens as well as foreign groups such as Russia's State-owned defence exports company Rosoboronexport. [11] It has also collected funding by substantial transfers of amounts allocated for corporate social responsibility in government-owned public sector corporations, universities, and banks as well as deductions from salaries of government employees. [12] [13] [14] [15] Consequently, the PM CARES Fund has faced criticism for the lack of transparency and accountability in relation to its establishment, functioning, and accounts. [16] [17] Substantial litigation regarding this is ongoing. [18] [8]

While total accounts for the Fund have not been made public, and cannot be subject to transparency and disclosure laws, partial accounts released by the Fund as well as statements by government officials indicate that part of their corpus has been spent on procuring vaccines against COVID-19, as well as to purchase ventilators following large scale shortage of such facilities, as well as oxygen, during the COVID-19 pandemic in India. [19] While funds have been promised for vaccine development in 2020, these have not been allotted as of 2022, and two-thirds of the corpus remains unspent. [19] Additionally, ventilators purchased by the funds have been criticised over quality concerns, with several hospitals returning them as they were not usable for patients and government panels flagging quality issues. [20] [21] [22] Additionally, concerns have been raised about the processing of tendering, as several manufacturers were found to have no have had no experience in manufacturing ventilators before this. [23] [24]

Establishment

The documentation concerning the establishment of the PM CARES Fund was not made publicly available until December 2020, although the Fund was established in March of that year. [25] [26] [27] Officials have described the Fund as a "public charitable trust" and stated that the deed establishing the trust was registered on 27 March 2020. [26] In June 2020, the Prime Minister's Office stated in response to an application for the disclosure of the founding documents of the trust, that the Fund is not a "public authority" as far as transparency laws such as the Right to Information Act 2005 are concerned, and declined to provide the documentation. [7] In December 2020, a trust deed in relation to the Fund was posted on its website, which contained a clause indicating that the Fund, although it bore the national emblem, and used government infrastructure, was a private entity. There is ambiguity on whether the PM CARES Fund is a public body, subject to transparency laws and mandatory audits, or a private body which is completely exempt from scrutiny by representative bodies. [27]

A complete list of trustees of the Fund is not publicly available, although government officials have stated that the Fund is chaired by the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, and has additionally ex-officio members including the Defence minister, the Home minister and the Finance minister. [28] [26] In April 2020, government officials were reported as stating that the Fund "could have" 3 experts appointed by the Prime Minister to advise on the spending of the Fund's resources. [29] Officials also suggested that the trust deed would allow for the creation of an advisory panel of ten members to provide similar advice. [29]

In August 2020, a petition filed under the Right to Information Act 2005 to the Cabinet Secretariat disclosed that the establishment of the PM CARES Fund had not been discussed by the cabinet before it was established. Petitions for additional information on the establishment of the Fund, filed with the Ministry of Law and Justice, have not been answered. [30]

PM CARES Fund has been registered as a Public Charitable Trust. The trust deed of PM CARES Fund has been registered under the Registration Act, 1908 at New Delhi on 27 March 2020. Documentation disclosed by the Government of India in December 2020, after a sustained campaign for transparency regarding the Fund, reveals that the Trust Deed constituting the Fund describes it as a private trust, stating "The trust is neither intended to be or is in fact owned, controlled or substantially financed by any government or any instrumentality of the government." [27] This stance was contradicted by the Government of India a few weeks later, which admitted in a formal response to an RTI petition that the Fund was "owned by, controlled by and established by the government of India". [10] [31] The Government of India has repeatedly denied the supply of information regarding the Fund under India's transparency law, the Right to Information Act 2005, which applies to all public bodies, on the grounds that it is not a public body. [7] In December 2020, following several assertions from the Government of India that the PM CARES Fund was a private body, and not a public fund, an application was moved to question the use of the national emblem of India in the Fund's documentation. As it is illegal for the national emblem to be used for private entities, the application sought prosecution under the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005, for using the national emblem in the PM CARES Fund documentation. [32] The Government of India, in response, has asserted now that it is a public body, controlled by the Government of India, but is still not subject to transparency laws like the RTI Act. [27]

Foreign donations and FCRA exemptions without audits

The initial announcements accepting donations to the PM CARES Fund included details allowing domestic and international transfers of funds, and Indian ambassadors were directed to mobilise donations from foreign countries. [33] The Government of India announced that it would be setting aside a 15-year old policy of declining foreign aid in cases of disasters and calamities. [34] [35]

Foreign contributions and donations are regulated by the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act 2010 (FCRA) which requires registration, and regular documentation of funds received; however, the Fund has been exempted from all provisions of the FCRA. [36] Per an order of the Home Ministry from 2011 and a subsequent order on in January 2020, organisations that are given exemptions from the provisions of the FCRA must be compulsorily audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG). However, the PM CARES Fund is not being audited by the CAG, and is being audited by a private party appointed directly by the Government of India instead. [37]

Tax exemptions

In April 2020, the Government of India issued an ordinance to exempt donations made to the Fund before 30 June, allowing them to qualify for a tax deduction under section 80G of The Income-tax Act, 1961. [38] [39] [40]

Retrospective amendments for corporate social responsibility exemptions

The PM CARES Fund was initially announced as a public body, on its establishment, and the day after it was established, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs announced that donations to the fund would be eligible as corporate social responsibility (CSR) contributions, allowing companies to claim tax exemptions on donations to the Fund. [27] The Ministry of Corporate Affairs announced in March 2020 that donations would be counted as part of the statutory Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) obligation of the companies, with additional CSR being offset in subsequent years. [39] As the Companies Act 2013 only allowed CSR exemptions for funds established by the government for socio-economic development and relief work, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued a circular in March 2020, authorising exemptions for the PM CARES Fund, noting that it was a public fund established by the Central Government. [41] Prior guidelines concerning donations to similar funds such as the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund disallowed CSR exemptions, and a government panel had described these as allowing the same tax benefits twice, amounting to a "regressive incentive". [25]

However, the Prime Minister's Office and other government authorities subsequently declined to provide information regarding the PM CARES Fund on the grounds that it was not a public authority. Subsequent disclosures of the PM CARES Trust deed indicated that the Fund was not a public body, and therefore donations to the Fund would not qualify for CSR exemptions. In order to remedy the illegality of the original exemption, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs amended the relevant schedule to the Companies Act 2013, to allow CSR donations to funds that were not set up by the Government of India. The amendment was made with retrospective effect, to cover any donations made prior to the amendment. [41] [42] Information obtained under the Right to Information Act by the Huffington Post has revealed that the exemptions were made at the request of a Bhaskar Kulbe, advisor to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. [43]

Donations made to the state governments' initiatives and other national relief funds, such the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund or Chief Minister's Funds do not qualify for the CSR exemption. [44] [25]

Existing relief funds

The establishment of the PM CARES Fund has been criticised on the grounds that there already exists the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF), which was established in 1948 to provide relief and assistance to those suffering in times of natural disasters, calamities, and riots. [45] [46] In addition to political opposition, the Chief Ministers of several states questioned about the preference for PM CARES over the individual relief funds of each state. [47] The PMNRF is directly managed by the Prime Minister's Office and donations made to it are exempt under the Income Tax Act 1960. [48] It has been utilized since 1948 to provide relief and assistance in several instances. [25] Like the PM CARES Fund, donations to the PMNRF are not transparent and names of donors or amounts of donors are not publicly disclosed or subject to audit. [49] Activists working on transparency and accountability in PMNRF Funds suggested that rather than set up a separate, similar fund, the Government of India could restructure the PMNRF itself, bringing it under parliamentary oversight and disclosing details of funding and spending. [49]

There is also an existing National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) established under the Disaster Management Act of 2005. In a challenge at the Supreme Court, the Government of India distinguished the PM CARES Fund on the grounds that the NDRF does not accept private donations and is publicly funded. [8]

Newspaper reports suggest that officials have sought to differentiate the PM CARES Fund from the PMNRF, pointing out that the PM CARES has a defined objective in its trust deed, unlike the general relief aims of the PMNRF, and that the trust deed of the PM CARES Fund allows the Prime Minister to appoint experts as advisors in the allocation of funds. [29] Commentators have also suggested that the reduced oversight on spending in PM CARES Fund allows money to be allocated more quickly, particularly as authorisation processes applicable to government spending are not required. [50] However, specific details concerning the distinction between PM CARES and PMNRF are not clear, as the trust deed and other governing documents for PM CARES have not been publicly disclosed. [25] Legal experts have also argued that a dedicated fund for addressing concerns from the COVID-19 pandemic would be more effective than the PMNRF, which deals with various kinds of disasters and crises. [50] However, the announcement of the PM CARES Fund by Prime Minister Narendra Modi indicated that its use was not limited to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that the Fund would also cater to future "distressing situations" apart from the COVID-19 pandemic. [51] At the time that the PM CARES Fund was established, the PMNRF had an already existing unspent fund of 3800 crores. [25]

Income and expenditure

Corpus

The total amount currently donated to the PM CARES fund has not been disclosed publicly. In September 2020, a statement was uploaded to the PM CARES website indicating that the total amount donated to the fund between 27 March 2020, when the fund was established, and 31 March 2020, was 30.76 billion. The statement does not disclose the names and identities of the donors. The statement indicates the receipts (in crore rupees) as: [28] [52] [53] [54]

YearReceiptsBalanceRef
2019-203076.623076.62 2019-20
2020-2110990.177013.99 2020-21

The Times of India reported on 19 May 2020 that it had received an estimated amount of US$1.4 billion (10,600 crore) within the first two months of its establishment but noted that the data on the total amount of donations received had not been disclosed by the Government of India and could potentially exceed this amount. Based on publicly available news reports of donations declared by various corporations and individuals, Times of India has suggested that 53% of this amount is from private sector corporations and employees, while 42% is from public sector undertakings and their employees in India, and the remaining 5% is from individuals. [55]

The fund enables micro-donations. [56] The minimum donation accepted for the Fund is 10 (equivalent to 12or15¢ US in 2023). [50]

Voluntary donations

A number of celebrities, including athletes, actors, and corporations have pledged support to the PM CARES Fund. [57] Several public-sector undertakings have pledged support to the Fund. [58] [59] [60] In addition, several government officials have pledged support by donating part of their salaries, although concerns have been raised about circulars mandating or requiring such donations from government officials. [61] [62] [63]

Private sector corporations that have pledged support include Larsen & Toubro, [64] Infosys Foundation, [58] the Adani Foundation, [58] Reliance Industries, [58] the Hero Group, [58] the TATA Trust, [58] Paytm [58] and the Azim Premji Foundation. [65] Private individuals who have pledged support to the PM CARES include actors Akshay Kumar, [66] Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh, [67] Shah Rukh Khan, [67] producer Karan Johar. [68]

Foreign donations

The Government of India announced that it would be setting aside a 15-year old policy of declining foreign aid in cases of disasters and calamities, in order to accept foreign donations to the PM CARES Fund. [34] [35] The Fund has since received pledges of support from a number of foreign entities and persons, including Russia's State-owned defence exports company Rosoboronexport. [11] In January 2021, an RTI application was filed seeking information about whether the Fund had received donations from Pakistan and China, after Indian embassies for those countries solicited donations to the Fund on their social media handles. A response from the High Commissions in Pakistan and China admitted to soliciting donations but confirmed that they had not personally solicited donations, and nor had such donations had been received from those countries. [12]

Transfer of funds from public sector undertakings, banks, and educational institutions

In August 2020, petitions filed under the Right to Information Act 2005 by the Indian Express to 32 public sector undertakings (PSUs) in India indicated that a total of 21050 million had been transferred to the PM CARES Fund, primarily from their corporate social responsibility budget allocations for 2019-20 and 2020–21. A petition for the same information that was made to the Prime Minister's Office was denied, with the Government of India stating that the Fund was not a public authority and did not have to account for the funds under the Right to Information Act. [14] In December 2020, the Indian Express reported that a total of 101 public sector units had transferred 2,400 crore (equivalent to 28 billionorUS$350 million in 2023) from their corporate social responsibility funds, and a total of 155 crore (equivalent to 182 croreorUS$23 million in 2023) from staff salaries, to the PM CARES Fund. [15]

RTI applications filed directly to PSUs have also demonstrated that the transfer of finances to the PM CARES Fund were taken from staff salaries. [69] Several public sector banks, including State Bank of India, Union Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Bank of Maharashtra, and Small Industries Development Bank of India, as well as public sector undertakings and regulators like Life Insurance Corporation of India and Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, together contributed 2047.5 million to the PM CARES Fund. [69] While some of the PSUs had sourced these transfers from their CSR allocations, the Indian Express stated that their Right to Information petitions revealed that in one case, the CSR allocation had been exceeded, and in others, the amount of allocation had not been finally decided when the transfer was made. [14] Applications for this information that were filed directly to the PM CARES Fund.

RTI applications filed to government-funded educational institutions also indicate that a total sum of 218.1 million has been transferred to the PM CARES Fund from staff salaries and pension accounts. Institutions such as NCERT, Banaras Hindu University, Aligarh Muslim University, and Central Sanskrit University, as well as 20 Indian Institutes of Technology transferred funds from staff salary accounts (including both, teaching and non-teaching staff), as well as from pension funds, research funds, and student funds. [13]

Transfer of funds from the Indian military

In March 2020, the Indian Defence Ministry released a statement, indicating that it would encourage military personnel to donate one day's salary to the PM CARES Fund, and that their aim was to collect approximately 500 crore (equivalent to 588 croreorUS$74 million in 2023) from such donations. [70]

In 2020, the Indian Express filed Right to Information petitions with all three branches of the Indian military - the Indian Army, Air Force, and Navy, seeking details of transfers made to the PM CARES Fund. The Indian Navy disclosed that it had transferred a sum of 12.41 crore (equivalent to 15 croreorUS$1.8 million in 2023) between April and October 2020 to the PM CARES Fund, “in respect of officers and sailors” and also a sum of 4.36 crore (equivalent to 5.1 croreorUS$640,000 in 2023) "in respect of civilian personnel". The Navy declined to disclose details of contributions made to the PM CARES Fund under any other heads of accounts. The Indian Air Force indicated that a total of 29.18 crore (equivalent to 34 croreorUS$4.3 million in 2023) was transferred to the PM CARES Fund "by IAF personnel". The Indian Army did not reply to the petition, but had previously shared on social networking site Twitter, in May 2020 that "IndianArmy personnel have voluntarily contributed 157 crore (equivalent to 185 croreorUS$23 million in 2023) as one day salary for Apr 2020 towards Nation’s fight against COVID-19 pandemic to PMCARES fund.” In total, the military transferred 203.67 crore (equivalent to 240 croreorUS$30 million in 2023) to the PM CARES Fund. [70]

Default and mandatory donations

On 3 April 2020, doctors' associations at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi objected to a circular from the hospital's administration, indicating that a day's salary would be deducted from their accounts and donated to the PM CARES Fund. The AIIMS administration ultimately withdrew their circular and accepted a proposal that doctors could opt in to a scheme to donate to the fund or could donate to any charitable organisation of their choice, on a purely voluntary basis. [71] [72] Similar proposals for mandatory or opt-out donations were subsequently withdrawn from three other hospitals based in Delhi following protests from doctors' associations: Safdarjung Hospital, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences (ABVIMS)-Ram Manohar Lohia (RML) Hospital, and Lady Hardinge Medical College and Hospital. [73]

On 17 April 2020, the Jharkhand High Court ordered six petitioners to deposit 35,000 each in the PM CARES Fund, and install the Government of India's COVID-19 surveillance and tracking mobile application, Aarogya Setu, as conditions for granting him bail in a criminal case. [74] In August 2020, the Punjab and Haryana High Court issued a similar order, requiring a deposit of 100,000 as costs into the PM CARES Fund. [75]

On 19 April 2020, the registry of the Supreme Court of India issued a notice informing its employees that all officers would be donating three days' salary to the Fund, and that non-gazetted officers, and group-C employees would be donating two and one day's salary respectively. The circular gave employees one day to opt out of donations, stating that failure to opt out would be considered as consent to donating. [76]

On 19 April 2020, the Revenue Department of the Finance Ministry issued a circular indicating that one day's salary per month, from April 2020 to March 2021, from each employee would be redirected to the fund unless employees who were "unwilling to donate" indicated their unwillingness in writing to their departments. [76] The move was criticised by government employees, who noted that this amounted to 12% of a month's salary for government employees, many of whom could not afford to release the funds. [76] The former Comptroller-General of Defence Accounts stated that the opt-out system left employees vulnerable to professional consequences if they did not donate. [77] Other government employees objected on the grounds that it constricted their ability to choose to donate to other relief funds, such as state's Chief Minister Relief Funds. [78] [79] Following public criticism, on 30 April 2020, the Revenue Department amended this circular, making the donation opt-in instead of opt-out, and asking employees to write in if they wished to donate a day's salary every month to the PM CARES Fund. [80]

On 20 April 2020, the Delhi University administration was criticised after funds collected for a donation specifically to the National Disaster Relief Fund were redirected to the Fund without disclosing this to donors. Delhi University officials stated that the funds were redirected on orders from the Ministry of Human Resources Development of the Government of India. [81] The Delhi University Teachers' Association wrote a letter of objection to the Delhi University administration, noting that the university had traditionally supported the NDRF or Chief Minister's Relief Fund either through local Staff Associations or through the Vice Chancellor's Relief Fund, and that the redirection of funds without disclosure constituted a betrayal of trust. [81]

Spending and allocations

The Prime Minister had said that the PMO had received many requests to help in the war against COVID-19 and that the PM CARES Fund would be used for disaster management and research. [82] [83] On 10 May 2020, government officials stated that spending and allocations from the Fund would begin once a "respectable amount" had been collected. [25] The Fund has not disclosed its spending or procurement guidelines. [9]

The first allocations from the fund were announced on 13 May 2020, with a total amount of 3,100 crore earmarked for spending. [84] Of this amount, the Government of India stated that funds from PM CARES would be utilised to buy 50,000 ventilators that were manufactured in India, which would then be allocated to government hospitals in states and union territories. An additional sum of 1000 crore would be allocated to states and union territories to address issues faced by migrant workers, including provisions for accommodation, food, medical treatment and transportation. 100 crore would be allocated for the development of a vaccine against COVID-19, to be spent under the supervision of the Principal Scientific Advisor to the Government. [85] [86] [87] The Secretary to the Department of Biotechnology confirmed that funds spent on developing a vaccine would only be allocated to indigenous research projects. [86]

On 21 June 2020, BJP President J.P. Nadda stated that 60,000 ventilators would be made available via funding from the Fund, by the end of June. [88]

Purchases of ventilators and quality concerns

On 24 June 2020, the Government of India issued a statement, indicating that 6% of the ventilators ordered by the Fund, i.e. 2,923 of 50,000, had been made, and were allocated to states and union territories facing a high number of cases, such as Maharashtra (275), Delhi (275), Gujarat (175), Bihar (100), Karnataka (90) and Rajasthan (75). [89]

Two government-appointed clinical evaluations committees raised concerns, on 16 May 2020 and 1 June 2020, about the procurement of sub-standard ventilators financed by the PM CARES Fund. These ventilators were purchased from Indian medical start-ups, and were flagged by the medical committees as being insufficient to meet the needs of patients with COVID-19, with a recommendation that they should only be used if a back-up ventilator was available in case of failures. One of the suppliers of these ventilators stated that there were no guidelines or standards that they were required to comply with in order to be eligible for government procurement. [22]

In August 2020, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare disclosed in response to petitions filed under the Right to Information Act 2005 that two indigenously manufactured ventilator models had failed trials. The ventilators were manufactured by Jyoti CNC Automation and Andhra Pradesh MedTech Zone and were funded by an allocation of 225 million from the PM CARES and had failed trials by a technical committee appointed by the Ministry. [90] In September 2020, Trivitron Healthcare, an Indian manufacturer, confirmed to Huffington Post that they had received an order to construct 10,000 ventilators, paid for via the PM CARES Fund, despite having no prior experience in manufacturing ventilators. A representative from Trivitron stated that they had begun to design and manufacture the ventilator, including basic prototypes, after receiving the order. [24]

In July 2020, Delhi-based Loknayak Hospital raised concerns about the ventilators purchased via PM CARES and provided by the Government of India, noting that the ventilators could not deliver sufficient rates of oxygen and could only be used on 10-15% of their patients. [20] Doctors at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, a medical and research facility in Chandigarh, received 10 ventilators provided by the PM CARES Fund, but declined to use them as they were found to be faulty. [91] The civil hospital in Ahmedabad had also written to the Central government in May 2020, indicating that the ventilators acquired by the PM CARES Fund allocations were not functioning as required. [90] The State of Karnataka stated that it would deploy 640 ventilators obtained with PM CARES Fund, but only after they had been tested to confirm that they meet the specifications. [92] In October 2020, the Karnataka Government received 2025 ventilators received via PM CARES Fund support but clarified that these were unnecessary as they did not require additional ventilators in government hospitals. The Karnataka government accordingly launched a scheme to loan these excess ventilators to private health care providers that needed them, but were unsuccessful, because the ventilators did not meet updated treatment protocols for administering oxygen. [93]

In April 2021, the Rajasthan State Government sent an official communication to the Central Government, regarding faulty ventilators that had been allocated using PM-CARES funding. The letter was sent after multiple medical establishments in Rajasthan reported that the ventilators received were defective. [21] On 10 April 2021, the Pimpri-Chichwad Municipal Corporation in Maharashtra reported that 17 out of 72 ventilators supplied using PM CARES Fund had broken down and had not been repaired, and were lying unused. [94]

On 16 July 2020, BJP leader Prabhakar Shinde asked the Municipal Commissioner of Mumbai to take legal action against officials who were not using ventilators donated via PM CARES purchases. [95]

2021 Covid-19 cases and oxygen supplies

In October 2020, the Government of India issued an online tender to construct 150 medical oxygen plants in district hospitals in India, later adding 12 more plants for a total of 162. The funds for these plants were allocated via the PM CARES Fund. The responsibility of construction of these plants was provided to the Central Medical Services Society, an autonomous institution directed by the Central Ministry of Health, and not to state governments, as was reported by a number of political activists. [96] An investigation by the news website Scroll in April 2021 indicated that of the 162 plants sanctioned, they could only confirm that 11 plants had been installed of which 5 were operational. [97] On 18 April 2021, the Health Ministry stated that 33 plants had been installed, but did not indicate how many were operational. [98] On 22 April 2021, the Central Government admitted in proceedings before the Delhi High Court that it had previously sanctioned 8 of these oxygen plants for the national capital territory of Delhi, but that only one had been constructed by the Central Government to date. Joint Secretary (Health) Vipun Nayak told the court that a decline in COVID-19 cases during January and February 2021 had led to a slow-down in the construction managed by the Central Government. [99]

On 26 April 2021, the Prime Minister's Office announced that they had allocated funds for the construction of a total of 551 oxygen plants at government hospitals, as well as allocating funds for the acquisition of 100,000 portable oxygen concentrators, in response to widespread oxygen shortages following a rise in COVID-19 cases. [100] [101]

Accountability and transparency

Non-disclosure of information

On 5 June 2020, the Prime Minister's Office stated that the PM CARES fund did not qualify as a public authority for the purposes of the Right to Information Act 2005, and accordingly refused to disclose a copy of the trust deed that established the fund, any government circulars or documents related to the fund, or the exemption certificates granted to it under the Income Tax Act 1961. [102] This order was challenged by appeal, and the Appellate Authority under the Right to Information Act 2005, in the Prime Minister's office again refused to disclose the information. [7] A challenge against these orders is currently pending in the High Court of Delhi. [103] On 17 August 2020, a second request for information on the PM-CARES Fund under the Right to Information Act 2005 was denied. [104] In October 2020, an application under the Right to Information Act filed with the National Informatics Center indicated that the PM CARES Fund had been allotted a government domain name, which can only be granted to government entities; however, they refused to disclose further information about the Fund, stating that it isn't available with them. [105] [106] In January 2021, a group of 100 retired Indian civil servants including A.S. Dulat (former head of the Research and Analysis Wing), K. Sujatha Rao (former Secretary, Family Health) and S. C. Behar, wrote to Prime Minister Modi, flagging concerns about the refusal to disclose information about the Fund under the Right to Information Act 2005. [107]

In August 2020, petitions filed under the Right to Information Act 2005 to the Ministry of Labour concerning the allocation of funds for migrant laborers were denied, and the Ministry stated that the Fund was not a public authority and accordingly was not obliged to respond to the petition. A similar petition filed with the Chief Labour Commissioner received a response indicating that no funds had been earmarked for migrant labor as yet. [108]

Exemption from audits

In April 2020, the Prime Minister's Office stated that PM CARES would not be audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, since the PM CARES fund consisted of private donations and not public funds. Officials working with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India stated that they were not allowed to audit the fund, since it was "based on donations of individuals and organisations". The Prime Minister's National Relief Fund, although not officially audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General, has complied with audits questioning its spending, such as in the case of the 2013 Uttarakhand floods. [47]

Private audits and issuance of receipts

In response to criticism concerning the lack of audits, accountability and transparency, the Government of India stated on 30 July 2020 that "independent auditors who will be appointed by the trustees" would audit the fund, and that such auditors would be appointed by the trustees of the Fund. [36] The Government of India also agreed to start issuing receipts for donations. [36]

In June 2020, a private firm of chartered accountants, SARC and Associates was reported to have been appointed as auditors for the PM CARES Fund for a period of three years. [26] SARC and Associates has previously audited the PMNRF in 2019, replacing another private firm as its auditor. [109] Sunil Kumar Gupta, the head of SARC and Associates, has acted as an advisor to several government entities in the past. [110] The selection and appointment process for the private auditor has not been made public. [110] Gupta has previously written a book about the government's 'Make in India' initiative, and has appeared on news channels Zee News and the state-owned Doordarshan TV to promote government programs. [111]

Foreign donations

The PM CARES Fund is exempt from scrutiny and monitoring of all foreign donations, as the provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act have been exempted as far as the Fund is concerned. In April 2020, the Home Ministry of India declined to comment on a pledge of financial support to PM CARES from Russian state-owned defence company, Rosoboronexport, in response to concerns about the departure from India's prior policy of only accepting foreign donations from non-resident Indians, persons of Indian origin, and international organisations. [11] In June 2020, Opposition leaders criticised the Government of India for accepting donations to the PM CARES Fund from Chinese-owned companies, in light of the 2020 China-India skirmishes and the Government of India's bans on Chinese products, including mobile applications. [112] Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh stated that Chinese donations accepted to the PM CARES Fund ought to be returned. [113]

Fraudulent accounts

Immediately after the fund was created, multiple fake accounts were found in circulation. While the original UPI accounts were pmcares@sbi and pmcares@iob, Delhi Police booked an individual for creating a UPI account removing the 's' called pmcare@sbi, intended to scam people. [114] The Press Bureau of India issued a clarification on twitter, confirming its donation information to ensure that funds were not donated to fraudulent accounts. [115]

On 26 April 2020, police in Navi Mumbai registered a criminal case after a person provided funds via the PhonePe following a call soliciting donations to the PM CARES Fund. The call was alleged to be fraudulent. [116]

Litigation concerning the PM CARES Fund

Transparency and accountability

In August 2020, the Supreme Court of India rejected a petition filed by the Center for Public Interest Litigation, a non-profit organisation, which sought the transfer of funds from PM CARES to the National Disaster Response Fund, and refused to pass orders directing that the fund should be audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. The Supreme Court held that the Government of India was free to make transfers between the two funds at its discretion. The Supreme Court also rejected a related plea calling on the Court to direct the Government of India to create a new national disaster relief plan to address the COVID-19 pandemic in India, finding the existing disaster relief plans to be sufficient. [117] [118] A review petition against this order is currently pending, as of October 2020. [119]

The Supreme Court of India had previously dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Manohar Lal Sharma for questioning the legality of the constitution of PM CARES Fund for COVID-19, describing the petition as 'misconceived', in April 2020. [120]

A number of petitions concerning the lack of transparency and accountability of the PM CARES Fund are pending in High Courts in India. On 14 May 2020, the Bombay High Court sought a response from the Government of India in response to a petition seeking a declaration of the amount of funds received by the PM CARES Fund, and calling on the government to publish details of funds received and spent on the PM CARES website. [121] On 3 June 2020, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court issued notice to the Government of India in a petition seeking details of the amounts collected so far in the Fund to fight COVID-19 pandemic and it's audit processes, [122] but later dismissed this petition. [123] On 4 June 2020, the Delhi High Court heard a public interest petition filed, seeking to bring transparency to the PM CARES Fund by making the Right to Information Act 2005 applicable to it. [18] On 10 June 2020, the Delhi High Court heard a petition filed by Samyak Gangwal, who challenged an order of the Prime Minister's Office refusing to disclose information about the establishment and governance of the Fund under the Right to Information Act 2005. The case is ongoing. [103]

On 22 May 2020, Praveen Kumar, a lawyer in Bengaluru, filed a criminal complaint against Sonia Gandhi and other opposition leaders following tweets by them criticising the Fund on grounds of transparency and accountability. The criminal complaint was registered under provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 153 (relating to provocations with the intent to cause riots) and Section 505(1)(b) (relating to the intent to cause fear or alarm in the public). [124]

Challenges to mandatory donations

On 17 June 2020, the Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal from a Delhi University professor who challenged a mandatory deduction from his salary to the PM CARES Fund, referring to the petitioner as "stone-hearted". The petitioner had argued that the university ought to have taken the consent of its employees before making the deduction. [125]

In October 2020, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity modified one of its own orders requiring the payment of a fine to the PM CARES Fund, and allowed the fine to be paid to the National Disaster Response Fund instead. The petitioners in this case argued that as the Government of India itself had declared that the PM CARES Fund was not a government fund for the purpose of transparency, and had refused to allow it to be audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), they could not be compelled to donate to it. The Tribunal accepted this argument. [126]

In September 2020, an anonymous user on the social news aggregation website, Reddit, purchased a domain name "pmcares.fund" and created a satirical browser game. The page displays browser game that involves a figure representing Prime Minister Narendra Modi overcoming several obstacles including the judiciary, media, and economy, and also an error message stating that details of the PM CARES Fund are unavailable because of the lack of government disclosures. The website gained wide attention on several social media platforms including Twitter and Facebook. [127] [128] [129]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prime Minister of India</span> Head of the executive branch of the Government of India

The prime minister of India is the head of government of the Republic of India. Executive authority is vested in the prime minister and his chosen Council of Ministers, despite the president of India being the nominal head of the executive. The prime minister has to be a member of one of the houses of bicameral Parliament of India, alongside heading the respective house. The prime minister and their cabinet are at all times responsible to the Lok Sabha.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rajiv Gandhi Foundation</span>

The Rajiv Gandhi Foundation was established on 21 June 1991. The foundation works on a range of issues including development of knowledge, health, disability, authorization of the destitute, livelihoods and natural resource management. Its current focus areas are community welfare, literacy, health and special programmes for children and women. All donations to the foundation are tax deductible to the extent of 50 percent under section 80G of the Income Tax Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arvind Kejriwal</span> 7th Chief Minister of Delhi (2013–14 and 2015–present)

Arvind Kejriwal is an Indian politician, activist and former bureaucrat, who is serving as the 7th and current Chief Minister of Delhi since 2015, after his first term in the post from 2013 to 2014. He is also the national convener of the Aam Aadmi Party since 2012. He has represented the New Delhi constituency in the Delhi Legislative Assembly since 2015 and from 2013 to 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manish Sisodia</span> 1st Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi

Manish Sisodia is an Indian politician, journalist and former social activist who served as the first Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi from 2015 to 2023. He is currently imprisoned over allegations of corruption. He represents the Patparganj constituency in Delhi Legislative Assembly since 2015 and had also represented the constituency from 2013 to 2014. He has been in custody since February 2023 on corruption charges in a major Delhi liquor scam. He is one of the founding members of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and a member of its National Executive Committee.

Sanjiv Chaturvedi is an Indian Forest Service (IFS) officer posted as Chief Conservator of Forest (Research) at Haldwani in the Nainital district of Uttarakhand. Chaturvedi was a Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO) at AIIMS, New Delhi from 2012 to 2014, and served in the government of Haryana from 2005 to 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public image of Narendra Modi</span> Public views on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Narendra Modi, the 14th Prime Minister of India, has elicited a number of public perceptions regarding his personality, background and policies.

Vipul Aggarwal is a 2001 batch Indian Police Service Officer from the Gujarat Cadre. He has recently been appointed as the Principal Commissioner of the Delhi Development Authority. Before this new role, he served as the Joint Secretary in the Department of Health & Family Welfare. Prior to this, he also served as the Deputy CEO of the National Health Authority, a government agency responsible for implementing healthcare schemes in India, from February 2020 to August 2022. During his tenure, he played a pivotal role in the policy formulation and implementation of the world's largest health assurance scheme, Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana, which provided coverage to an estimated 540 million Indian citizens.

Coimbatore Metro, also known as Kovai Metro, is a proposed rapid transit system for Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ayushman Bharat Yojana</span> Healthcare programme in India

Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana(PM-JAY) is a national public health insurance scheme of the Government of India that aims to provide free access to health insurance coverage for low income earners in the country. Roughly, the bottom 50% of the country qualifies for this scheme. People using the program access their own primary care services from a family doctor and when anyone needs additional care, PM-JAY provides free secondary health care for those needing specialist treatment and tertiary health care for those requiring hospitalization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prime Minister's National Relief Fund</span>

Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF) in India is the fund raised to provide support for people affected by natural and man made disasters. Natural disasters covered under this include flood, cyclone, earthquake etc. Man made disasters include major accidents, acid attacks, riots etc. The fund is also allotted to the people for treatment like cancer, kidney transplantation, heart surgery etc. The fund was first consolidated during the time of the first prime minister of republic of India Jawaharlal Nehru.

The COVID-19 pandemic in India is a part of the worldwide pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. As of 5 May 2024, according to Indian government figures, India has the second-highest number of confirmed cases in the world with 45,036,197 reported cases of COVID-19 infection and the third-highest number of COVID-19 deaths at 533,581 deaths. In October 2021, the World Health Organization estimated 4.7 million excess deaths, both directly and indirectly related to COVID-19 to have taken place in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in India</span> Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Indias economy

The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in India has been largely disruptive. India's growth in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2020 went down to 3.1% according to the Ministry of Statistics. The Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India said that this drop is mainly due to the coronavirus pandemic effect on the Indian economy. Notably, India had also been witnessing a pre-pandemic slowdown, and according to the World Bank, the current pandemic has "magnified pre-existing risks to India's economic outlook".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">COVID-19 lockdown in India</span> Quarantine effort in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in India

On the evening of 24 March 2020, the Government of India ordered a nationwide lockdown for 21 days, limiting the movement of the entire 1.38 billion population of India as a preventive measure against the COVID-19 pandemic in India. It was ordered after a 14-hour voluntary public curfew on 22 March, followed by enforcement of a series of regulations in COVID-19 affected countries. The lockdown was placed when the number of confirmed positive coronavirus cases in India was approximately 500. Upon its announcement, a mass movement of people across the country was described as the largest since the partition of India in 1947. Observers stated that the lockdown had slowed the growth rate of the pandemic by 6 April to a rate of doubling every six days, and by 18 April, to a rate of doubling every eight days. As the end of the first lockdown period approached, state governments and other advisory committees recommended extending the lockdown. The governments of Odisha and Punjab extended the state lockdowns to 1 May. Maharashtra, Karnataka, West Bengal, and Telangana followed suit. On 14 April, Prime minister Narendra Modi extended the nationwide lockdown until 3 May, on the written recommendation of governors and lieutenant governors of all the states, with conditional relaxations after 20 April for the regions where the spread had been contained or was minimal.

The first case of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu was reported on 7 March 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ram Mandir</span> Temple of the Hindu deity Rama in Ayodhya, India

The Ram Mandir is a partially constructed Hindu temple complex in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India. Many Hindus believe that it is located at the site of Ram Janmabhoomi, the mythical birthplace of Rama, a principal deity of Hinduism. The temple was inaugurated on 22 January 2024 after a prana pratishtha (consecration) ceremony. On the first day of its opening, following the consecration, the temple received a rush of over half a million visitors, and after a month, the average number of visitors was reported to be "1 to 1.5 lakh on a daily basis".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic</span> Condition of migrant workers during the ongoing COVID-19 viral pandemic in India

Indian migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic have faced multiple hardships. With factories and workplaces shut down due to the lockdown imposed in the country, millions of migrant workers had to deal with the loss of income, food shortages and uncertainty about their future. Following this, many of them and their families went hungry. Thousands of them then began walking back home, with no means of transport due to the lockdown. A study found that 43.3 million interstate migrants returned to their home during the first wave of Covid-19 led lockdowns and out of 43.3 million around 35 million walked home or used unusual means of transportation. In response, the Central and State Governments took various measures to help them, and later arranged transport for them. 198 migrant workers died due to the lockdown, with reasons of road accidents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian government response to the COVID-19 pandemic</span> Actions by the Indian government on COVID-19 pandemic

The first responses of the government of India to the COVID-19 pandemic in the country involved thermal screenings of passengers arriving from China, the country from which the coronavirus disease 2019 originated, as well as of passengers arriving from other countries. As the pandemic spread worldwide, the Indian government recommended social distancing measures and also initiated travel and entry restrictions. Throughout March 2020, several shutdowns and business closures were initiated, and by the end of the month, the Indian government ordered a widespread lockdown. An economic package was announced in May 2020.

Events in the year 2021 in India for real time basis.

Electoral Bonds were a mode of funding for political parties in India from their introduction in 2017 till they were struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court on 15 February 2024. Following their termination, a five-judge bench headed by the Chief Justice directed the State Bank of India to hand over the identities and other details of donors and recipients to the Election Commission of India, which was in turn asked to publish them on its website.

References

  1. "PM-CARES Fund not a fund of Government of India, Delhi HC told". The Indian Express. 23 September 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
  2. Roy, Divyanshu Dutta (ed.). "PM Modi Announces New COVID-19 Fund, Gets Rs 25 Crore From Akshay Kumar". NDTV. Retrieved 29 March 2020.
  3. "People urged to donate generously in PM CARES fund; PM Modi says every contribution matters". newsonair.com. Archived from the original on 29 March 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2020.
  4. "PM Narendra Modi announces PM-CARES fund to fight coronavirus outbreak". Business Standard India. PTI. 29 March 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2020.[ permanent dead link ]
  5. Livemint (21 September 2022). "Govt appoints Ratan Tata, 2 others as trustees of PM CARES Fund". mint. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
  6. NETWORK, LIVELAW NEWS (18 August 2020). "No Occasion For CAG Audit Of PM CARES Fund As It Is A Public Charitable Trust: SC [Read Judgment]". www.livelaw.in. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
  7. 1 2 3 4 "'PM CARES not a public authority under RTI Act': PMO rejects application seeking fund details; will appeal, says law student". Firstpost. 31 May 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  8. 1 2 3 "In top court, Centre defends creation of PM CARES Fund". The Indian Express. 10 July 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  9. 1 2 "Secrecy surrounds India PM's '$1bn' Covid-19 fund". BBC News. 30 June 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  10. 1 2 "PM-CARES "Controlled By Government" But RTI Doesn't Apply: New Flip-Flop". NDTV.com. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
  11. 1 2 3 Haidar, Suhasini; Peri, Dinakar (15 April 2020). "Coronavirus | Russian arms firm to donate $2 million to PM CARES Fund". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  12. 1 2 "Indian missions didn't approach any potential donor for PM-CARES in Islamabad, Beijing: RTI". Deccan Herald. 17 January 2021. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  13. 1 2 "IITs, IIMs, Central universities, Navodaya schools dip into pay for PM Cares". The Indian Express. 22 September 2020. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
  14. 1 2 3 "Maharatnas to navratnas: 38 PSUs give Rs 2,105 crore from CSR to PM CARES". The Indian Express. 19 August 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  15. 1 2 "101 PSUs give Rs 155 crore from their staff salaries to PM fund". The Indian Express. 7 December 2020. Archived from the original on 7 December 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  16. The Curious Case of PM CARES Fund: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Suppression of Civil Society in India. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Accessed 12 May 2021.
  17. Government-Citizen Pandemic Relief Efforts: Case of India's PM CARES Fund. Public Economics: National Government Expenditures & Related Policies eJournal. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Accessed 12 May 2021.
  18. 1 2 Singh, Soibam Rocky (4 June 2020). "Plea in Delhi High Court seeks to bring PM CARES Fund under RTI". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  19. 1 2 Jebaraj, Priscilla (7 February 2022). "One-third of ₹10,990 crore in PM CARES fund spent: '20-'21 audit". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 31 October 2022.
  20. 1 2 "Coronavirus: Delhi's Lok Nayak Hospital flags key defect in ventilators supplied by Centre". Scroll.in. July 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  21. 1 2 Scroll Staff (8 April 2021). "Coronavirus: Ventilators given under PM-CARES fund are faulty, Rajasthan tells Centre". Scroll.in. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
  22. 1 2 "Govt Panels Flag Issues With AgVa Ventilators Bought By PMCARES Fund". HuffPost India. 24 June 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  23. "Company With No Ventilator Model Got Rs 373 Cr PM CARES Order To Make 10,000 Ventilators". HuffPost. 24 September 2020. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
  24. 1 2 "Company With No Ventilator Model Got Rs 373 Cr PM CARES Order To Make 10,000 Ventilators". HuffPost India. 24 September 2020. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jebaraj, Priscilla (10 May 2020). "How different is the PM CARES Fund from the PM's National Relief Fund?". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  26. 1 2 3 4 "PM CARES Fund - PM's Citizen Assistance & Relief in Emergency Situations Fund". www.pmcares.gov.in. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 "PM-CARES Public Or Private Fund? Documents Reveal Contradiction". NDTV.com. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
  28. 1 2 "PM CARES Got Rs 6,500 Cr A Month Ago, Allocates Rs 3,100 Cr To COVID-19 Fight Now". HuffPost India. 14 May 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  29. 1 2 3 Sharma, Aman. "PM-CARES fund to have up to 13 eminent experts". The Economic Times. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  30. "PM Modi didn't seek cabinet nod to set up PM CARES Fund: RTI reply". The Week. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  31. "PM-CARES Public Or Private Fund? Documents Reveal Contradiction". NDTV.com. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
  32. Web Desk (17 December 2020). "PM CARES: Petition questions use of national emblem for a non-govt entity". english.madhyamam.com. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
  33. Jebaraj, Priscilla (3 April 2020). "PM-CARES | Centre sends conflicting signals on foreign donations". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  34. 1 2 Roche, Elizabeth (1 April 2020). "New Delhi to accept foreign aid to deal with covid-19 pandemic crisis". Livemint. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  35. 1 2 "Coronavirus: Govt to accept foreign contribution to PM-CARES fund". The Indian Express. 2 April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  36. 1 2 3 Sharma, Aman. "PM-CARES to be audited by independent auditors". The Economic Times. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  37. Jebaraj, Priscilla (11 September 2020). "PM CARES Fund gets FCRA exemption without meeting pre-condition of CAG audit". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 15 September 2020.
  38. "Donation to PM CARES Fund to be fully exempted section 80G of I-T Act". The Hindu @businessline. 31 March 2020. Retrieved 1 April 2020.
  39. 1 2 Noronha, Gaurav (31 March 2020). "Govt clarifies on company's contributions to PM CARES Fund above CSR limit". The Economic Times. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  40. "Ordinance issued to make PM CARES donations tax free". The Economic Times. 1 April 2020. Retrieved 1 April 2020.
  41. 1 2 Jebaraj, Priscilla (20 August 2020). "Centre set up PM CARES, indicates memo". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  42. P, Ambika (22 August 2020). "RTI activists question Centre's decision to put PM CARES Fund in Companies Act for CSR eligibility". The Times of India. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  43. "EXCLUSIVE: Modi Advisor's Letter Undermines PMO Claim That PM CARES Isn't Covered By RTI". HuffPost India. 31 August 2020. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
  44. "Donations to PM CARES allowed under CSR, but not to states or CMs: Corporate ministry". The Print. 11 April 2020.
  45. "Congress questions setting up of PM CARES Fund to deal with coronavirus". The Hindu. 30 March 2020. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  46. Nair, Sobhana K. (2 April 2020). "Why PM CARES Fund when there is PMNRF, asks CPI(M) MP". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  47. 1 2 Prabhu, Sunil (24 April 2020). "PM CARES Fund Won't Be Checked By Government's Auditor, Say Sources". NDTV. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  48. "Prime Minister's National Relief Fund". pmnrf.gov.in. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  49. 1 2 "PM CARES And PMNRF Both Opaque In Same Way, Documents Show". HuffPost India. 8 April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  50. 1 2 3 "PM CARES Fund better suited to deal with coronavirus crisis, say legal experts". www.businesstoday.in. 31 March 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  51. "Narendra Modi announces new fund for people to donate towards govt fight against coronavirus". Business Insider. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  52. "PM-CARES Got Rs 3,076 Crore In 5 Days; P Chidambaram Says Name Donors". NDTV.com. Retrieved 11 September 2020.
  53. PM CARES Fund (7 September 2020). "Receipts and Payments Account for the period ending March 31st, 2020" (PDF). PM CARES Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2020.
  54. "PM CARES Fund - PM's Citizen Assistance & Relief in Emergency Situations Fund".
  55. Chitra, Rachel Chitra (19 May 2020). "PM Cares Fund Collection: PM-CARES corpus crosses $1 billion". The Times of India. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  56. Sharma, Sandhya (29 March 2020). "Cyber chief's warning as hackers target PM's Covid fund". The Economic Times. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  57. "Here Is List Of Celebrities, Corporates And Ministers Who Donated To Fight Coronavirus". Outlook India. April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  58. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Here's how India Inc is contributing in fight against coronavirus pandemic". The Indian Express. 1 April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  59. "BCCI contributes 51 crores to PM Cares fund in fight against coronavirus". The Indian Express. 28 March 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  60. "Hockey India donate additional Rs 75 lakhs to PM-CARES Fund, golfer Anirban Lahiri pledges Rs 7 lakhs". The Indian Express. 4 April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  61. "CDS Bipin Rawat to donate Rs 50,000 every month for 1 year to PM-CARES fund". The Indian Express. 24 May 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  62. Ians (30 March 2020). "Coronavirus | President, V-P to donate a month's salary to PM-CARES Fund". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  63. "EPFO employees contribute ₹2.5 crore to PM CARES". The Hindu. 3 May 2020. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  64. "L&T announces Rs 150 crore donation to PM-CARES Fund to fight coronavirus". The Indian Express. 30 March 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  65. "Wipro, Azim Premji Foundation commit ₹1,125 crore to tackle COVID-19 crisis". The Hindu. 1 April 2020. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  66. "Coronavirus: Akshay Kumar donates Rs 25 crore to PM-CARES Fund". The Indian Express. 28 March 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  67. 1 2 "SRK offers 4-storey space to authorities for quarantine purpose, Deepika-Ranveer donate to PM-CARES Fund". The Indian Express. 4 April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  68. "Karan Johar's Dharma Productions to donate to PM-CARES, Maharashtra CM relief funds and NGOs". The Indian Express. 18 April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  69. 1 2 "From RBI & govt banks to LIC, Rs 205 crore to PM Cares from salaries". The Indian Express. 28 September 2020. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
  70. 1 2 "Armed forces gave Rs 203.67 cr from day's salary to PM-CARES Fund". The Indian Express. 18 December 2020. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
  71. "No mandatory deduction for donation to PM-CARES: AIIMS admin to RDA". The Hindu. PTI. 16 April 2020. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  72. PTI (16 April 2020). "No Mandatory Deduction for Donation to PM-CARES: AIIMS to RDA". TheQuint. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  73. Krishna, Tarun (13 April 2020). "Doctors at AIIMS, 3 Delhi hospitals say no to pay cut for PM CARES, Safdarjung accepts demand". ThePrint. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  74. "Deposit Rs 35,000 to PM-CARES Fund, download Arogya Setu App: Jharkhand HC sets unusual bail conditions". The Indian Express. 17 April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  75. Service, Tribune News. "Deposit Rs 1 lakh costs with PM-CARES Fund, says Punjab and Haryana High Court". Tribuneindia News Service. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  76. 1 2 3 Jebaraj, Priscilla; Singh, Vijaita; Saha, Manojit (19 April 2020). "Coronavirus | PM-CARES donations cut from government staff salaries". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  77. "PM CARES and the Paradox of Mandatory Contributions". The Wire. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  78. "FinMin Tells All Staff, Officers to Donate One Day's Salary Per Month to PM-CARES". The Wire. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  79. Gupta, Moushumi Das (19 April 2020). "Modi govt employees irked by pressure to donate to PM CARES Fund to fight Covid-19". ThePrint. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  80. "Finance Ministry issues modified circular on salary contribution to PM-CARES Fund". The Economic Times. Retrieved 23 July 2020.
  81. 1 2 Jebaraj, Priscilla (20 April 2020). "Staff donate for PMNRF, DU redirects money to PM-CARES". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  82. "PM CARES Fund: All You Need to Know". DATAQUEST. 30 March 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  83. "PM Modi announces emergency relief fund for coronavirus fight and for the people". The Economic Times. 28 March 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
  84. "Coronavirus | PM CARES makes first allocations". The Hindu. 13 May 2020. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  85. Sharma, Akhilesh; Prabhu, Sunil (13 May 2020). "Rs 3,100 Crore From PM CARES Fund Allocated For Ventilators, Migrants". NDTV. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  86. 1 2 Dutt, Anonna (14 May 2020). "Indian Covid-19 vaccine development to be backed by PM-CARES Fund". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  87. Sharma, Aman. "Rs 3,100 crore from PM CARES allocated to buy ventilators, help migrants and develop a vaccine". The Economic Times. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  88. "PM-CARES ventilator row: Experts discuss order and procurement challenges". cnbctv18.com. 7 July 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  89. "Only 6% ventilators under PM-CARES manufactured so far". The Indian Express. 24 June 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  90. 1 2 Jebaraj, Priscilla (21 August 2020). "Coronavirus | Ventilators from firms funded by PM CARES fail trials". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  91. "PGI gets 10 ventilators through PM CARES fund, finds them faulty". The Indian Express. 25 July 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  92. "Despite doubts about 'low-end' machines, Karnataka to deploy 640 PM Cares ventilators". The Indian Express. 22 July 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  93. "Karnataka Govt offer to loan PM Cares ventilators to private hospitals finds few takers". The Indian Express. 3 October 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  94. "Pune: 17 ventilators received under PM-Care Fund gather dust at YCM hospital". The Indian Express. 10 April 2021. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
  95. "Ventilators received under PM CARES lying unopened at civic hospitals: BJP". The Indian Express. 16 July 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  96. Saikia, Vijayta Lalwani & Arunabh (26 April 2021). "Fact check: Did states fail to use PM-Cares funds allocated by the Centre to build oxygen plants?". Scroll.in. Retrieved 27 April 2021.
  97. Saikia, Vijayta Lalwani & Arunabh (18 April 2021). "India is running out of oxygen, Covid-19 patients are dying – because the government wasted time". Scroll.in. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
  98. "Only 33 oxygen generation plants built, of 162 sanctioned: Health ministry". The Week. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
  99. Aneesha Mathur (22 April 2021). "Health Ministry tells HC only 1 of 8 oxygen plants sanctioned under PM CARES Fund set up in Delhi". India Today. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
  100. "COVID-19 surge: PM CARES Fund allocates funds for 551 oxygen plants in public health facilities". The Hindu. 25 April 2021. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 29 April 2021.
  101. "Coronavirus | PM CARES to fund 1 lakh portable oxygen concentrators". The Hindu. 28 April 2021. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 29 April 2021.
  102. LiveLaw News (30 June 2020). "PM CARES Fund Not A Public Authority Under RTI Act : Affirms Appellate Authority In PMO". LiveLaw. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  103. 1 2 "Plea to declare PM CARES Fund as a 'public authority' under RTI not maintainable: PMO to Delhi HC". The Indian Express. 10 June 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  104. Jebaraj, Priscilla (16 August 2020). "PMO denies RTI plea seeking info on PM-CARES". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 17 August 2020.
  105. Mathur, Aneesha (12 October 2020). "PM Cares website given govt internet domain name, reveals RTI; why so for a charitable trust, asks activist". India Today. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  106. Agarwal, Poonam (13 October 2020). "Now PMO Stops Govt Depts from Sharing RTI Info on PM CARES Fund". TheQuint. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  107. "Ex-bureaucrats flag 'clear lack of transparency' in PM Cares Fund". The Indian Express. 17 January 2021. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  108. "Cabinet never discussed setting up of PM-CARES fund: RTI". Deccan Herald. 21 August 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  109. Mohan, Archis (13 June 2020). "Trustees of PM CARES appoint SARC & Associates as auditor of fund". Business Standard India. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  110. 1 2 "PM CARES Fund Now Has 'Independent Auditor' But Remains Beset by Lack of Transparency". The Wire. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  111. "Delhi CA firm SARC to audit PM CARES fund- Business News". www.businesstoday.in. 10 June 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2021.
  112. "Chinese funds deposited into PM CARES on day of clash, says A.P Congress Committee president S. Sailajanath". The Hindu. 29 June 2020. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  113. Vasudeva, Vikas (30 June 2020). "'Return Chinese firms' donations to PM CARES'". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  114. Ojha, Arvind (30 March 2020). "Delhi Police books fraudsters for making fake SBI account of PM's Covid-19 Relief Fund". India Today. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  115. "PM CARES FUND fake UPI id scam: Make sure you donate to the correct ID". The Indian Express. 4 April 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  116. Assainar, Raina (26 April 2020). "Software engineer cheated of ₹28,000 under garb of PM Cares fund". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  117. Bindra, Japnam (18 August 2020). "No transfer of money from PM CARES to disaster relief fund: SC". Livemint. Retrieved 18 August 2020.
  118. "[Breaking] SC Dismisses Plea To Transfer PM CARES Funds To NDRF; Says Fresh National Disaster Plan For COVID-19 Not Needed [Read Judgment]". www.livelaw.in. 18 August 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  119. Jain, Mehal (21 September 2020). "PM Cares Fund Run By Trusteeship Of Council Of Ministers Itself, Without Statutory Support U/A 53(3)(b): Review Plea In SC Against Dismissal Of PIL For Transferring Funds To NDRF [Read Petition]". www.livelaw.in. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  120. "Misconceived Petition : SC Dismisses PIL Challenging PM CARES Fund". livelaw.in. 13 April 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  121. "Plea seeks declaration of amount received, spent by PM-CARES Fund". The Hindu. PTI. 14 May 2020. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  122. "Bombay HC's Nagpur bench issues notice to Centre over plea seeking details of PM CARES fund". The Indian Express. 3 June 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  123. Kashyap, Nitish (27 August 2020). "Contributions Made To The Fund Are Voluntary, No Compulsion For Anyone To Donate; Bombay HC Dismisses Advocate's PIL Seeking Public Declaration Of PM Cares Fund [Read Judgment]". www.livelaw.in. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  124. "FIR against Sonia Gandhi over Congress' tweets, party demands withdrawal of 'mischievous' complaint". The Indian Express. 22 May 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  125. "HC raps DU prof. for plea against deduction for PM CARES fund". The Hindu. PTI. 17 June 2020. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 30 July 2020.
  126. Saxena, Akshita (16 October 2020). "APTEL Permits Party To Deposit Cost To NDRF After It Is Contended That PM Cares Is Not A Govt Fund [Read Order]". www.livelaw.in. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  127. "Redditor makes game on PM CARES fund with Prime Minister Narendra Modi as the main character". Moneycontrol. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  128. "Reddit user's take on Chrome dinosaur game pokes fun at PM-CARES". The Week. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  129. "Reddit User Develops 'PM Cares Fund Not Found' Game Mocking Economy, COVID-19, Etc". in.news.yahoo.com. Retrieved 13 October 2020.