2018 Swiss sovereign-money initiative

Last updated

Swiss referendum of June 2018
on money creation
("Sovereign Money Initiative")
10 June 2018 [1]
Do you accept the popular initiative "for crisis-safe money: money creation by the National Bank only! (Sovereign Money Initiative)"? [2]
Website Official announcement
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes442,38724.28%
Light brown x.svg No1,379,44875.72%
Yes
 
24.28%
No
 
75.72%
Blank [note 1]
 
1.8%
Null [note 1]
 
0.4%

The Swiss sovereign money initiative of June 2018, also known as Vollgeld, [note 2] [note 3] was a citizens' (popular) initiative in Switzerland intended to give the Swiss National Bank the sole authority to create money. [2]

Contents

On 10 June 2018, the initiative was defeated in the vote, with 76% per cent of voters rejecting it. [3] [4]

Origin and proposal

Proposals for "full-reserve banking", going also by titles such as "debt-free money," have been repeatedly presented to the public and then attacked by both mainstream and heterodox economists who suggest that supporters of such "populist" schemes misunderstand central-bank operations, money creation, and how the banking system works. Russian-born British economist Abba Lerner, in 1943, had advocated that the central bank could start "printing money" to match government deficit-spending "sufficient to achieve and sustain full employment." [5] [note 4]

According to the initiative's supporters, [6] money is created as debt, and comes into existence by debt creation when commercial banks borrow from central banks, and when governments, producers, or consumers borrow from commercial banks. Proponents do not want money creation to be under private control as this constitutes a "subsidy" to the banking sector. They consider money created by the banks to create significantly adverse effects, such as inflation (since "the more money [the banks] issue, the higher their profits"), and amplification of crises (since borrowing occurs pro-cyclically). Furthermore, they claim that bank deposits are not inherently safe. [6]

The proposal for the referendum was initiated in 2014 by the Monetary Modernisation Association, a Swiss non-governmental organization [6] founded in 2011. The collection of signatures began in June 2014 and resulted in over 110,000 valid signatures. [7] The initiative was submitted to the Federal Chancellery in December 2015. [8]

On 31 January 2018, the Swiss state scheduled the referendum for 10 June 2018, with two issues on the ballot, one about gambling, and another about money creation by banks. [1] The Sovereign Money Initiative aims to give the Swiss Confederation a monopoly on money creation, including demand deposit (full-reserve banking), [7] by including the creation of scriptural money in the legal mandate of the Swiss National Bank. [8] The Swiss National Bank opposed the initiative. [9]

The coins of the Swiss franc. CHF coins.jpg
The coins of the Swiss franc.

The referendum does not concern the printing of banknotes or the minting of coins, as this remains under the exclusive authority of the Swiss National Bank, i.e. the nation's central bank, which has had this right since 1891. [7] The Federal Constitution states that "The Confederation [i.e. the Swiss state] is responsible for money and currency; the Confederation has the exclusive right to issue coins and banknotes" (article 99). [10] Thus, the creation of cash, today less than 10% of all the money in circulation, [7] remain under the control of the central bank. [11]

Reactions to the proposal

The Swiss National Bank chairman, Thomas Jordan, warned that "Acceptance of the initiative would plunge the Swiss economy into a period of extreme uncertainty" because "Switzerland would have an untested financial system that would differ fundamentally from that of any other country". [9] [12] The Deutsche Bundesbank does not support the initiative. [13]

In 2016, The Economist commented that the Sovereign Money Initiative "system would be safer for depositors" but that "a huge part of the Swiss economy, would be turned inside-out, with unpredictable but probably expensive consequences." [14] Global Finance described the Sovereign Money Initiative as "challenging the current worldwide norm". [11]

In June 2018, Financial Times associate editor and chief economics commentator Martin Wolf urged his readers to vote in favour of the Swiss initiative, stating that existing bank regulation and bank balance sheets would not be sufficient to prevent a major future crisis. [15] Economist L. Randall Wray has argued repeatedly on what he sees as the "foolishness" of policy proposals like the Vollgeld initiative. [16] [17] Writer and blogger Tim Worstall believed the initiative itself is ostensibly "driven by ill-informed loons." [18]

Result

On 10 June 2018, the Swiss rejected in a "landslide" of approximately 75% of negative votes the proposal of the sovereign-money project. [4] [19]

Historical precedents

The objective of the Swiss sovereign money initiative of June 2018 was essentially to "end fractional reserve banking." [2] [1] [8] The specific initiative in Switzerland was part of the so-called "International Movement for Monetary Reform," created by the lobbying organisation Positive Money in 2013. [20] The idea of requiring banks’ loans to be fully backed by deposits, according to them, has its roots in the Great Depression. [21]

Opposition to fractional-reserve banking has been prominent for over a century. The genesis of the Swiss initiative can be traced back to the so-called "Chicago plan" of reforms after the Great Depression. [4] In March 1933, economists from the University of Chicago circulated a six-page memorandum with a proposal to "radically" [22] change the structure of the American financial system. They proposed, among other things, the abolition of the fractional reserve system and the imposition of 100% bank reserves on demand deposits. The proposal in Switzerland to reform the ability of private banks to create money is based [23] on a theory of American economist Irving Fisher [24] from the 1930s.

The proposal resurfaced in 1939 [25] and came to be known as the "Chicago plan." [26]

The Vollgeld initiative's monetary reform ideas had already been the subject of a federal legislation proposal in the United States through U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich. [27] : 233–36  In 2011, Positive Money [28] and the American Monetary Institute [29] backed Kucinich's attempt to introduce the National Emergency Employment Defense Act, a bill of legislation that would assign the authority for money creation exclusively to the U.S. Treasury, [note 5] thus ending fractional banking. The proposal did not make it to the floor.

In 2015, following the 2008-11 crisis, Iceland's Prime Minister Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson commissioned a study for monetary and banking reform. Frosti Sigurjónsson, economist and MP, published his findings and recommendations the same year, [30] in which the abolition of fractional banking, among other things, was proposed. [31] [32] Economist Bill Mitchell criticized the Icelandic scheme, on the grounds that, as he stated, even if implemented, "essentially the money supply would still be endogenous," unless the country's central bank would be willing to "tolerate the interest rate going beyond its control" or witness "a lack of funds available for borrowing." Mitchell argued that the cause of the crisis in Iceland was not the "credit-creation capacity of the banks" but other factors, such as "banks speculating in foreign-currency debt & assets"; banks "no longer behaving like banks"; the owners of the specific banks "engaging in devious and self-serving" actions; and "lack of prudential control." [33]

The same year, the “Ons Geld” ("Our Money") organization that supports "sovereign monetary reform" in the Netherlands mounted a citizen's initiative [34] that resulted in parliamentary debate and the decision to have the government think tank Scientific Council for Government Policy study the proposal to have fractional banking outlawed and “money creation returned to public hands”. [27]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 In Switzerland, blank or null votes are counted but not considered valid. Only 'yes' and 'no' votes are considered to calculate the majority. See also the official results of the vote on the sovereign money initiative.
  2. ↑ In German: Vollgeld-Initiative; in French: Initiative Monnaie Pleine; in Italian : Iniziativa Moneta Intera
  3. ↑ The official title of the referendum is the Swiss federal popular initiative "for crisis-safe money: money creation by the National Bank only! (Sovereign Money Initiative)"
  4. ↑ "Government should adjust its rates of expenditure and taxation such that total spending in the economy is neither more nor less than that which is sufficient to purchase the full employment level of output at current prices. If this means there is a deficit, greater borrowing, “printing money,” etc., then these things in themselves are neither good nor bad, they are simply the means to the desired ends of full employment and price stability." Lerner (1943)
  5. ↑ In the words of the bill: "to restore the authority to create money to a Monetary Authority within the Department of the Treasury"

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monetary policy of the United States</span> Political Policy

The monetary policy of the United States is the set of policies which the Federal Reserve follows to achieve its twin objectives of high employment and stable inflation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monetary reform</span> Movements to amend the financial system

Monetary reform is any movement or theory that proposes a system of supplying money and financing the economy that is different from the current system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fractional-reserve banking</span> System of banking

Fractional-reserve banking is the system of banking in all countries worldwide, under which banks that take deposits from the public keep only part of their deposit liabilities in liquid assets as a reserve, typically lending the remainder to borrowers. Bank reserves are held as cash in the bank or as balances in the bank's account at the central bank. Fractional-reserve banking differs from the hypothetical alternative model, full-reserve banking, in which banks would keep all depositor funds on hand as reserves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Full-reserve banking</span> Offering of loans exclusively from time deposits

Full-reserve banking is a system of banking where banks do not lend demand deposits and instead only lend from time deposits. It differs from fractional-reserve banking, in which banks may lend funds on deposit, while fully reserved banks would be required to keep the full amount of each customer's demand deposits in cash, available for immediate withdrawal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monetary base</span> Measure of money supply

In economics, the monetary base in a country is the total amount of money created by the central bank. This includes:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Bank of Iceland</span> Monetary Authority of Iceland

The Central Bank of Iceland is the central bank or reserve bank of Iceland. It has served in this capacity since 1961, when it was created by an act of the Alþingi out of the central banking department of Landsbanki Íslands, which had the sole right of note issuance since 1927 and had conducted only limited monetary policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of the Federal Reserve</span>

The Federal Reserve System, commonly known as "the Fed," has faced various criticisms since its establishment in 1913. Critics have questioned its effectiveness in managing inflation, regulating the banking system, and stabilizing the economy. Notable critics include Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman and his fellow monetarist Anna Schwartz, who argued that the Fed's policies exacerbated the Great Depression. More recently, former Congressman Ron Paul has advocated for the abolition of the Fed and a return to a gold standard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Money creation</span> Process by which the money supply of an economic region is increased

Money creation, or money issuance, is the process by which the money supply of a country, or an economic or monetary region, is increased. In most modern economies, money is created by both central banks and commercial banks. Money issued by central banks is a liability, typically called reserve deposits, and is only available for use by central bank account holders, which are generally large commercial banks and foreign central banks. Central banks can increase the quantity of reserve deposits directly, by making loans to account holders, purchasing assets from account holders, or by recording an asset, such as a deferred asset, and directly increasing liabilities. However, the majority of the money supply used by the public for conducting transactions is created by the commercial banking system in the form of commercial bank deposits. Bank loans issued by commercial banks expand the quantity of bank deposits.

Modern monetary theory or modern money theory (MMT) is a heterodox macroeconomic theory that describes currency as a public monopoly and unemployment as evidence that a currency monopolist is overly restricting the supply of the financial assets needed to pay taxes and satisfy savings desires. According to MMT, governments do not need to worry about accumulating debt since they can pay interest by printing money. MMT argues that the primary risk once the economy reaches full employment is inflation, which acts as the only constraint on spending. MMT also argues that inflation can be controlled by increasing taxes on everyone, to reduce the spending capacity of the private sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Calvert Simons</span> American economist

Henry Calvert Simons was an American economist at the University of Chicago. A protégé of Frank Knight, his antitrust and monetarist models influenced the Chicago school of economics. He was a founding author of the Chicago plan for monetary reform that found broad support in the years following the 1930s Depression, which would have abolished the fractional-reserve banking system, which Simons viewed to be inherently unstable. This would have prevented unsecured bank credit from circulating as a "money substitute" in the financial system, and it would be replaced with money created by the government or central bank that would not be subject to bank runs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Credit theory of money</span> Economic theory

Credit theories of money, also called debt theories of money, are monetary economic theories concerning the relationship between credit and money. Proponents of these theories, such as Alfred Mitchell-Innes, sometimes emphasize that money and credit/debt are the same thing, seen from different points of view. Proponents assert that the essential nature of money is credit (debt), at least in eras where money is not backed by a commodity such as gold. Two common strands of thought within these theories are the idea that money originated as a unit of account for debt, and the position that money creation involves the simultaneous creation of debt. Some proponents of credit theories of money argue that money is best understood as debt even in systems often understood as using commodity money. Others hold that money equates to credit only in a system based on fiat money, where they argue that all forms of money including cash can be considered as forms of credit money.

Stephen A. Zarlenga was a researcher and author in the field of monetary theory, trader in stock and financial markets, and advocate of monetary reform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Recession</span> Global economic decline from 2007 to 2009

The Great Recession was a period of market decline in economies around the world that occurred from late 2007 to mid-2009. The scale and timing of the recession varied from country to country. At the time, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded that it was the most severe economic and financial meltdown since the Great Depression.

The Chicago plan was a monetary and banking reform program suggested in the wake of the Great Depression by a group of University of Chicago economists including Henry Simons, Garfield Cox, Aaron Director, Paul Douglas, Albert G. Hart, Frank Knight, Lloyd Mints and Henry Schultz. Its main provision was to require 100% reserves on deposits subject to check, so that "the creation and destruction of effective money through private lending operations would be impossible". The plan, in other words, envisaged to separate the issuing from the lending of money. This, according to its authors, would prevent the money supply from cyclically varying as bank loans were expanded or contracted. In addition, the payment system would become perfectly safe. No great monetary contraction as that of 1929-1933 could ever occur again.

Monetary reform, the reform of monetary creation and thus of the banking system, is a topical political issue in the United States, especially in light of the public debt, household debt, Social Security and other public sector undertakings and state debts. The financial crisis that began in U.S. in the fall of 2007 and subsequently affected large parts of the world, and was followed by massive bank rescues, also plays a major role in this context as well as criticism of Federal Reserve.

Positive Money UK is a not-for-profit advocacy group based in London and Brussels. Positive Money's mission is to promote various reforms of central banks and alternative monetary policy. Its current executive director is geophysicist Fran Boait.

The National Emergency Employment Defense Act, aka the NEED Act, was a monetary reform bill sponsored by Congressman Dennis Kucinich in 2011 in the United States House of Representatives.

Ten national referendums were held in Switzerland in 2018. Voting took place on 4 March, 10 June, 23 September and 25 November.

The International Movement for Monetary Reform is a worldwide umbrella organization for monetary reform organizations with member organizations in 27 countries, founded in 2013 at the initiative of the British organization Positive Money. Their political goal is to replace the creation of money by bank lending with a system that creates money free of debt. IMMR affiliated organizations developed sovereign money reform varieties, some country specific. The IMMR works with countries to promote a steady-state economy, without "too big to fail" banks.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Objets de la votation populaire du 10 juin 2018" ("Objects of the popular vote of 10 June 2018], Federal Chancellery of Switzerland (in French)
  2. 1 2 3 "Popular initiative: "For crisis-safe money: Money creation by the [Swiss] National Bank only! (Sovereign Money Initiative)"". Swiss government website . 28 March 2018. Retrieved 14 April 2018.
  3. ↑ Atkins, Ralph. "Swiss voters reject 'sovereign money' initiative". Financial Times. No. June 10, 2018. Retrieved 10 June 2018.
  4. 1 2 3 Bosley, Catherine (10 June 2018). "Swiss Reject Radical Sovereign Money Proposal". Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg. Retrieved 10 June 2018.
  5. ↑ "Functional Finance and the Federal Debt" by Abba Lerner, 1943, Selected Economic Writings of Abba Lerner, University of Missouri-Kansas City reprint
  6. 1 2 3 Joob, Mark (June 2014). "The Sovereign Money Initiative in Switzerland". World Economics Association Newsletter. 4 (3): 6–7.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Mehreen Khan, "Switzerland to vote on banning banks from creating money", The Daily Telegraph , 24 December 2015
  8. 1 2 3 Rimkus, Ron (5 February 2018) "What is the Vollged Initiative? Does it spell the end of fractional reserve banking?", City A.M.
  9. 1 2 "Swiss sovereign money initiative (Vollgeldinitiative): frequently asked questions" (PDF). Swiss National Bank. 5 March 2018. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
  10. ↑ Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation Archived 21 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine , Federal Chancellery of Switzerland (page visited on 13 April 2018).
  11. 1 2 Tiziana Barghini, shall "Swiss to vote on reclaiming fiat power", Global Finance , 5 April 2018
  12. ↑ Thomas Jordan, "How money is created by the central bank and the banking system", Swiss National Bank, 16 January 2018
  13. ↑ Jan Mallien, "Swiss proposal: castrating the banks", Handelsblatt Global , 25 April 2017 (page visited on 13 April 2018).
  14. ↑ "Shake your money makers", The Economist , 27 February 2016
  15. ↑ Martin Wolf: Why the Swiss should vote for "Vollgeld". Financial Times, 6 June 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2018
  16. ↑ "Debt-Free Money: A Non-Sequitur in Search of a Policy" by L. Randall Wray, New Economic Perspectives, 1 July 2014
  17. ↑ "Debt-Free Money and Banana Republics" by L. Randall Wray, New Economic Perspectives, 19 December 2015
  18. ↑ Worstall, Tim (25 December 2015). "Swiss Monetary Reform Referendum Is, Sadly, Driven By Ill Informed Loons". Forbes. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
  19. ↑ McDougall, Mary; Riley, Charles (10 June 2018). "Swiss vote down 'dangerous' overhaul of banks". Bloomberg. Retrieved 10 June 2018.
  20. ↑ Selby-Green, Michael (11 June 2018). "Swiss voters rejected a radical move to change the way money is created". Business Insider . Retrieved 2 July 2018.
  21. ↑ Bosley, Catherine (19 February 2018). "Why Swiss Vollgeld Vote Has the Central Bank Nervous". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2 July 2018.
  22. ↑ Phillips, Ronnie J. (June 1992). "The 'Chicago Plan' and New Deal Banking Reform". Jerome Levy Economics Institute. SSRN   160989.
  23. ↑ Kuenzi, Renat (23 April 2018). "Sovereign Money initiative in a nutshell". Swiss Broadcasting Corporation . Retrieved 2 July 2018.
  24. ↑ Fisher, Irving (April–June 1936). "100% Money and the Public Debt" (PDF). Economic Forum: 406–420.
  25. ↑ Douglas, Paul H.; Fisher, Irving; Graham, Frank Dunstone; Hamilton, Earl J.; King, Wilford I.; Whittlesey, Charles R. (July 1939). "A Program For Monetary Reform" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 15 April 2018.
  26. ↑ Benes, Jaromir; Kumhof, Michael (August 2012). "The Chicago Plan Revisited" (PDF). IMF Working Paper. ISBN   978-1-845740-65-8.
  27. 1 2 Eckrich, Lucille L. (2017). "Monetary Transformation and Education". In Hartlep, Nicholas D.; Eckrich, Lucille L.T. & Hensley, Brandon O. (eds.). The Neoliberal Agenda and the Student Debt Crisis in U.S. Higher Education. Routledge. ISBN   9781138194656.
  28. ↑ Tekelova, Mira (2 May 2012). "NEED Act". Positive Money. Retrieved 2 July 2018.
  29. ↑ Wolford, Ben (16 October 2013). "Major Historic Progress was made by Congressman Kucinich". American Monetary Institute. Archived from the original on 14 June 2018. Retrieved 2 July 2018.
  30. ↑ Sigurjónsson, Frosti (March 2015). "Monetary Reform - A better monetary system for Iceland" (PDF).
  31. ↑ Agence France-Presse, "Iceland looks at ending boom and bust with radical money plan", The Daily Telegraph , 31 March 2015
  32. ↑ Svanbjörn, Thoroddsen & Sigurjónsson, Sigurvin B. (2016) “Money Issuance: Alternative Monetary Systems”. A report commissioned by the Icelandic Prime Minister’s Office. KPMG, Iceland. 16–17.
  33. ↑ Mitchell, William (May 2015) "Iceland’s Sovereign Money Proposal – Part 1", "Part 2"
  34. ↑ "Maak publieke geldschepping bespreekbaar | burgerinitiatief". Burgerinitiatief Geldschepping. Retrieved 14 October 2019.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.