2008 Swiss referendums

Last updated

Ten referendums were held in Switzerland during 2008. The first two were held on 24 February on business tax reform and aircraft noise. A further three were held on 1 June on public information campaigns, naturalisation and health reform. The final five were held on 30 November on legalising cannabis, making the pension age flexible, restricting the right of appeal of associations against construction projects, amending the constitutional article on narcotics and eliminating the statute of limitations with respect to pornographic crimes against children.

Contents

February referendums

The two February questions were held on:

ChoiceVotes%
For938,74450.53
Against918,99049.47
Invalid/blank votes57,221–
Total1,914,955100
Registered voters/turnout4,957,88938.62
Source: Direct Democracy
ChoicePublic voteCantons
Votes%FullHalfTotal
For601,07131.92000
Against1,282,10868,0820623
Invalid/blank votes37,706––––
Total1,944,25910020623
Registered voters/turnout4,957,88938.74–––
Source: Direct Democracy

June referendums

The three referendums in June were held on:

All three questions were rejected in the referendum. The most controversial initiative was the proposal to allow local communities to hold popular votes on the naturalisation of foreigners with no right of appeal. [2]

Naturalisation

Switzerland has one of the largest number of foreign residents in Europe with foreigners making up over 20% of residents. In order to gain citizenship people must have lived in Switzerland for 12 years and have passed tests on the language and culture of Switzerland. In July 2003 the Swiss Supreme court blocked the holding of popular votes by local communities to decide on the naturalisation of immigrants who live in that community. [3] The Supreme Court acted after a vote in Emmen in which eight Italians were approved but 48 Eastern European and Turkish candidates were rejected. The court ruled that they had been discriminated against on religious and ethnic grounds and said that all applicants had the right to know the reason for rejection. [4]

The Swiss People's Party (SVP) brought an initiative forward to permit such popular votes to take place. [3]

During the campaign on naturalisation votes the SVP sent literature out detailing crimes committed by people who had been granted citizenship. [3] They also produced billboards showing black, brown and white hands reaching for Swiss passports and saying "Stop the Mass Naturalizations". [5] They argued the measure was needed due an eightfold increase in naturalisations between 1991 and 2006. [6]

The government and the four other main political parties opposed the naturalisation referendum and preferred the existing system where elected bodies took the decision and where there is a right to appeal. [3] In May 2008 a group of 72 professors of constitutional law produced newspaper adverts urging people to reject the measure. [7] Opponents argued that the measure was unconstitutional and violated international law. [5]

A poll on the referendum in April showed support for the measure but another in May showed only 33% supporting the measure, 56% against and 11% undecided. [8] [9]

In order for the initiative to pass a majority of Swiss cantons would have had to support it as well as a majority of voters. In the end only one of the 26 cantons, Schwyz, supported the initiative. Some cantons, such as Geneva and Vaud, had up to 82% of voters against the measure. [4]

Internal disputes within the People's Party and the lack of a clear message in favour of the proposal were seen as reasons for the defeat of the measure. The government welcomed the results of the referendum saying that they showed people had confidence in the authorities. [10]

ChoicePublic voteCantons
Votes%FullHalfTotal
For804,73036.25101
Against1,415,24963.7519622
Invalid/blank votes25,598––––
Total2,245,57710020623
Registered voters/turnout4,970,22045.18–––
Source: Direct Democracy

Government information

This question asked voters to restrict the information that the government could provide before referendums. The measure would have prevented members of the government from giving their opinions on topics that were to be voted on in a referendum. [11] Supporters, including the People's Party, argued the government should not be providing what they described as propaganda at the expense of the taxpayers. The measure had been proposed due to what they described as excessive government propaganda on foreign policy questions. [5] However opponents, including most other political parties, argued it was the job of the government to provide their opinion on referendums. [2]

ChoicePublic voteCantons
Votes%FullHalfTotal
For538,92824.80000
Against1,634,19675.2020623
Invalid/blank votes56,089––––
Total2,245,57710020623
Registered voters/turnout2,229,21344.85–––
Source: Direct Democracy

Health reform

This measure was intended to reform the health sector by reducing expenditures and increasing the role of insurers. [10] The measure would have amended the constitution to give an outline of the health care system including the principles of competition and free choice. It was designed to increase competition within the health insurance sector. However opponents feared it would bolster the position of insurance companies, give higher costs for patients and restrict access to doctors. It was supported by the government but opposed by the Social Democratic and Christian Democrat parties. [2]

ChoicePublic voteCantons
Votes%FullHalfTotal
For661,31230.52000
Against1,505,70269.4820623
Invalid/blank votes60,196––––
Total2,227,21010020623
Registered voters/turnout4,970,22044.81–––
Source: Direct Democracy

November referendums

In the November referendums Swiss voters rejected initiatives aiming at a legalisation of cannabis, at a flexibilisation of the pension age and at restricting the right of appeal of associations against construction projects. They accepted the revision of the federal statute on narcotics and, as a surprise result, the elimination of the statute of limitations with respect to pornographic crimes against children. [12]

Elimination of the statute of limitations with respect to pornographic crimes against children

The initiative "for the elimination of the statute of limitations with respect to pornographic crimes against children" (German : Für die Unverjährbarkeit pornografischer Straftaten an Kindern, French : Pour l'imprescriptibilité des actes de pornographie enfantine) provided for an amendment to the Swiss Federal Constitution, introducing a new article 123b stating that "the prosecution of sexual or pornographic infractions against prepubescent children, as well as the penalty for such infractions, are not subject to the statute of limitations".

The initiative was submitted on 1 March 2006 by "Marche Blanche", an association of victims of child sexual abuse and their relatives, with 119,375 valid signatures. [13] The proponents of the initiative argued that victims of pedophilia often take a long time to become old enough and muster the courage to bring the perpetrators, who are often members of their immediate family, to justice. Therefore, according to the proponents, the statute of limitations often has the effect of preventing the effective prosecution of child sexual abuse.

The Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Assembly recommended that the initiative be rejected. The National Council opposed the initiative with 163 against 19 votes, the Council of States unanimously. [14] All political parties in Switzerland with the exception of the Swiss People's Party and the Federal Democratic Union also opposed the initiative. [15] The federal authorities argued that the initiative was vaguely phrased, making reference to the puberty of children, a developmental phase often difficult to exactly pinpoint in time and varying among children. They noted that the statute of limitations was necessary to prevent useless prosecutions, because after dozens of years the testimony of witnesses was often not reliable enough to secure a conviction. In the opinion of the federal authorities, imprescriptibility should remain reserved for crimes of exceptional gravity such as genocide and terrorist acts. Finally, the federal authorities argued that a previous change in law had already accomplished much of what the proponents desired, fixing the period of prescription at 15 years starting with the 18th birthday of the victim. [16]

ChoicePublic voteCantons
Votes%FullHalfTotal
For1,206,32351.8716418
Against1,119,11948.13425
Invalid/blank votes48,870––––
Total2,374,31210020623
Registered voters/turnout4,996,62647.52–––
Source: Direct Democracy

Legalisation of the personal consumption and production of cannabis

The initiative "for a sensible cannabis policy with effective protection of the youth" (German : Für eine vernünftige Hanfpolitik mit wirksamem Jugendschutz, French : Pour une politique raisonnable en matière de chanvre protégeant efficacement la jeunesse) provided for an amendment to the Federal Constitution. It would have introduced a new article 105b declaring the consumption, purchase and production of cannabis for personal use to be legal, while charging the federal authorities with ensuring an adequate protection of the Swiss youth.

The initiative was submitted on 13 January 2006 by a committee of left-wing and liberal politicians with 105,994 valid signatures. [17] The proponents of the initiative argued that the prohibition of cannabis was ineffective, as attested by some 600,000 consumers of the drug in Switzerland, and should be lifted. [18]

The Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Assembly recommended that the initiative be rejected. The National Council opposed the initiative with 111 against 73 votes, the Council of States with 19 against 18. [19] Among the political parties in Switzerland, only the liberal and left-wing parties and the youth wing of the Free Democratic Party of Switzerland supported the initiative. [20]

ChoicePublic voteCantons
Votes%FullHalfTotal
For846,98536.75000
Against1,457,90063.2520623
Invalid/blank votes60,546––––
Total2,365,43110020623
Registered voters/turnout4,996,62647.34–––
Source: Direct Democracy

Revision of the federal statute on narcotics

The revision of the federal statute on narcotics (German : Bundesgesetz über die Betäubungsmittel und die psychotropen Stoffe, French : Loi fédérale sur les stupéfiants et les substances psychotropes) was adopted on 20 March 2008 by the Swiss Federal Assembly, with the National Council passing the law by 114 to 68 votes and the Council of States unanimously. [13] It provided for a statutory basis for the Swiss strategy against illegal drugs practiced since 1999, which consists of four pillars: prevention, harm reduction, therapy and repression. Most controversially, the revision allowed for a continuation of the governmental distribution of heroin to heavily addicted persons. [12]

Objecting to that programme and demanding a strict policy of prohibition, a committee of conservative politicians of the Federal Democratic Union and Swiss People's Party [12] collected 51,969 valid signatures against the change in law, thereby subjecting it to a popular referendum. [21]

ChoiceVotes%
For1,541,92868.08
Against722,99231.92
Invalid/blank votes82,003–
Total2,355,412100
Registered voters/turnout4,996,62647.14
Source: Direct Democracy

Restriction of the right of associations to appeal against building projects

The initiative for the restriction of the right of associations to appeal against building projects (German : "de:Verbandsbeschwerderecht: Schluss mit der Verhinderungspolitik - Mehr Wachstum für die Schweiz!", French : "Droit de recours des organisations: Assez d'obstructionnisme - Plus de croissance pour la Suisse!") provided for an amendment to the Federal Constitution. It would have introduced a new article 30a, which would have removed the standing of environmental organizations to take legal action against construction projects approved by popular vote or by a federal, cantonal or municipal legislature.

ChoicePublic voteCantons
Votes%FullHalfTotal
For773,46734.00000
Against1,501,76666.0020623
Invalid/blank votes83,980––––
Total2,359,21310020623
Registered voters/turnout4,996,62647.22–––
Source: Direct Democracy

Flexible state pension age

The initiative "for a flexible state pension age" (German : ""für ein flexibles AHV-Alter"", French : «Pour un âge de l'AVS flexible») provided for an amendment to the Federal Constitution. It would have introduced a new article art. 112 par. 2 littera e, which would have allowed most people to retire without the loss of state benefits at the age of 62 instead of at the age of 65 for men or 64 for women.

ChoicePublic voteCantons
Votes%FullHalfTotal
For970,22141.38404
Against1,374,59858.6216619
Invalid/blank votes35,377––––
Total2,380,19610020623
Registered voters/turnout4,996,62647.64–––
Source: Direct Democracy

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popular initiative</span> Popular voter petition systems

A popular initiative is a form of direct democracy by which a petition meeting certain hurdles can force a legal procedure on a proposition. The hurdles the petition has to meet vary between countries, typically signatures by a certain number of registered voters.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Switzerland since 1 July 2022. Legislation to open marriage to same-sex couples passed the Swiss Parliament in December 2020. The law was challenged in a referendum on 26 September 2021 by opponents of same-sex marriage and was approved with the support of 64% of voters and a majority in all 26 cantons. The law went into force on 1 July 2022. A provision of the law permitting same-sex marriages performed abroad to be recognised in Switzerland took effect on 1 January 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swiss nationality law</span> History and regulations of Swiss citizenship

Swiss citizenship is the status of being a citizen of Switzerland and it can be obtained by birth or naturalisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swiss Federal Constitution</span> Constitution of the Swiss Confederation

The Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation of 18 April 1999 is the third and current federal constitution of Switzerland.

Voting in Switzerland is the process by which Swiss citizens make decisions about governance and elect officials. The history of voting rights in Switzerland mirrors the complexity of the nation itself. The polling stations are opened on Saturdays and Sunday mornings but most people vote by post in advance. At noon on Sunday, voting ends and the results are usually known during the afternoon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Switzerland–European Union relations</span> Bilateral relations

Switzerland is not a member state of the European Union (EU). It is associated with the Union through a series of bilateral treaties in which Switzerland has adopted various provisions of European Union law in order to participate in the Union's single market, without joining as a member state. Among Switzerland's neighbouring countries, all but one are EU member states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Group for a Switzerland without an army</span> Swiss anti-military advocacy group

The Group for a Switzerland without an army, is a Swiss political advocacy group founded in 1982 by 120 activists in order to abolish the Swiss army. Its roster has varied considerably; as of 2009 its website stated that it consists of about 20,000 members or supporters, consisting largely of pacifists and anti-militarists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Swiss minaret referendum</span> Successful popular initiative in Switzerland

The federal popular initiative "against the construction of minarets" was a successful popular initiative in Switzerland to prevent the construction of minarets on mosques. In a November 2009 referendum, a constitutional amendment banning the construction of new minarets was approved by 57.5% of the participating voters. Only three of the twenty Swiss cantons and one half canton, mostly in the French-speaking part of Switzerland, opposed the initiative.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannabis in Switzerland</span> Use of cannabis in Switzerland

Cannabis in Switzerland is illegal, though minor possession was decriminalised to a fine in 2012. Several cantons began to allow adults to cultivate and use cannabis in 2012, but this was struck down by federal courts. In 2016, four cities stated they were looking into establishing pilot cannabis clubs. The number of cannabis users in Switzerland is estimated to be around 500,000 among a population of 8 million.

Eight referendums were held in Switzerland during 2009. The first was held on 8 February on extending the freedom of movement for workers from Bulgaria and Romania. The next two were held on 17 May 2009 on introducing biometric passports and the "Future with complementary medicine" proposal. A further two were held on 27 September on increasing VAT and the introduction of public initiatives. The final three were held on 29 November on banning the construction of new minarets, exporting weapons and the use of aviation fuel taxation.

The largest immigrant groups in Switzerland are those from Germany, Italy, France, the former Yugoslavia, Albania, Portugal and Turkey, including Turks and Kurds. Between them, these six groups account for about 1.5 million people, 60% of the Swiss population with immigrant background, or close to 20% of total Swiss population.

Twelve national referendums were held in Switzerland during 2012. On 11 March voters across the country were asked five questions on employment leave, second houses, building society savings, the Fixed Book Price Agreement and gambling revenues. On 17 June there were three questions on healthcare, foreign policy and home buying. On 23 September there were three on a smoking ban, secure housing in old age and music lessons at school. A final referendum was held on 25 November on the Animal Diseases Act.

Twelve national referendums were held in Switzerland during 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 Swiss immigration initiative</span> Referendum in Switzerland

In Switzerland, the federal popular initiative "against mass immigration" was a referendum that aimed to limit immigration through quotas, as it had been prior to the bilateral treaties between Switzerland and the European Union (EU) launched in 2002.

Seven national referendums were held in Switzerland during 2017. Polling took place on 12 February, 21 May and 24 September, whilst no referendum was scheduled for the November date.

Several federal referendums were held in Switzerland in 2020, with voting on 9 February, 27 September and 29 November. Voting was also planned for 17 May, but was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Liechtenstein referendum</span>

A three-part referendum was held in Liechtenstein on 30 August 2020. Voters were asked whether they approve of an initiative proposing changes to the constitution to promote the equal representation of women in political bodies, a parliament law allowing dual citizenship for naturalised citizens, and a decision by the government to fund a railway line expansion. All three proposals were rejected.

Federal referendums were held in Switzerland on 7 March, 13 June, 26 September, and 28 November 2021. Swiss referendums take three forms: popular initiatives, which are citizen proposals to create a new law and require 100,000 valid signatures on a petition to get on the ballot; facultative or optional referendums, which are citizen proposals to approve or reject a piece of existing law and require 50,000 valid signatures on a petition to get on the ballot; and mandatory referendums, which are required to revise the constitution, join an international organisation or introduce emergency federal legislation for over a year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Swiss referendums</span>

Federal referendums were held in Switzerland on 13 February, 15 May and 25 September 2022. Swiss referendums take three forms: popular initiatives, which are citizen proposals to create a new law and require 100,000 valid signatures on a petition to get on the ballot; facultative or optional referendums, which are citizen proposals to approve or reject a piece of existing law and require 50,000 valid signatures on a petition to get on the ballot; and mandatory referendums, which are required to revise the constitution, join an international organization or introduce emergency federal legislation for over a year.

Two referendums were held in Liechtenstein during 2022. The first was held on 26 June 2022, in which voters decided on an exemption for pensioners from paying the annual deductible of the national health insurance. The second was held on 18 September on COVID-19 legislation.

References

  1. ↑ Referendum gegen Unternehmenssteuerreform eingereicht NZZ
  2. 1 2 3 "Citizenship issue comes to a nationwide vote". Swissinfo . 2008-05-31. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "Swiss reject citizenship controls". Al Jazeera. 2008-06-01. Archived from the original on 2008-06-02. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  4. 1 2 "Switzerland-Citizenship Referendum". PR-inside.com. 2008-06-01. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  5. 1 2 3 "A Debacle for the Xenophobes". Der Spiegel . 2008-06-02. Retrieved 2008-06-02.
  6. ↑ Harnischfeger, Uta (2008-06-01). "Swiss to Decide on Secret Votes by Public on Citizenship Candidates". The New York Times . Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  7. ↑ "Swiss nationalist party campaigns against mass naturalizations, accused of racism". International Herald Tribune . 2008-05-31. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  8. ↑ "Swiss Vote to Allow Popular Ballots on Citizenship Applications". Bloomberg L.P. 2008-06-01. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  9. 1 2 "Citizenship vote outcome stirs mixed emotions". Swissinfo . 2008-06-01. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  10. ↑ "Swiss voters say 'no, no, no'". World Radio Switzerland. 2008-06-02. Archived from the original on 2008-09-26. Retrieved 2008-06-02.
  11. 1 2 3 "Swiss to agree heroin scheme but say no to dope". Swissinfo . November 30, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-30.
  12. 1 2 Swiss Federal Assembly website.
  13. ↑ Voter information by the Swiss Federal Council, p. 4.
  14. ↑ "Volksinitiative "Für die Unverjährbarkeit pornografischer Straftaten an Kindern"" (in German). Swiss Federal Assembly . Retrieved 2008-11-30.[ dead link ]
  15. ↑ Voter information by the Swiss Federal Council, p. 6–7.
  16. ↑ Swiss Federal Assembly website Archived 2007-03-07 at the Wayback Machine .
  17. ↑ Voter information by the Swiss Federal Council, p. 39.
  18. ↑ Voter information by the Swiss Federal Council, p. 32.
  19. ↑ "Volksinitiative "Für eine vernünftige Hanf-Politik mit wirksamem Jugendschutz"" (in German). Swiss Federal Assembly . Retrieved 2008-11-30.[ dead link ]
  20. ↑ Swiss Federal Chancellery press release Archived 2012-02-13 at the Wayback Machine , 22 July 2008.
Official information about the referendums
Campaign websites
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.