Arkansas House Bill 1570 (2021)

Last updated
Save Adolescents from Experimentation Act
Seal of Arkansas.svg
93rd Arkansas General Assembly
  • An act to create the Arkansas Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act; and for other purposes.
CitationA.R. Legis. Assemb. Act 626. Reg. Sess. 2021-2022 (2021).
Territorial extent Arkansas
Passed by Arkansas House of Representatives
PassedMarch 10, 2021
Passed by Arkansas Senate
PassedMarch 29, 2021
Legislative history
First chamber: Arkansas House of Representatives
Bill titleHouse Bill 1570
Introduced by Robin Lundstrum (R–87)
First reading February 25, 2021
Second reading February 25, 2021
Third reading March 10, 2021
Second chamber: Arkansas Senate
Bill titleHouse Bill 1570
Member(s) in charge Alan Clark (R–13)
First readingMarch 10, 2021
Second readingMarch 10, 2021
Third readingMarch 29, 2021
Summary
Bans gender affirming medical procedures for youth, prohibits the use of public funds for and prohibits insurance from covering "gender transition procedures", enables disciplinary action against medical professionals who violate the ban
Status: Blocked

Arkansas House Bill 1570 (HB 1570), also known as the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act or Act 626, is a 2021 law in the state of Arkansas that bans gender-affirming medical procedures for transgender people under 18, including puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and sex reassignment surgery. The law also bans the use of public funds for and prohibits insurance from covering gender transition procedures, while doctors who provide treatment in violation of the ban can be sued for damages or professionally sanctioned. The measure makes Arkansas the first U.S. state to make gender-affirming medical care illegal.

Contents

In early 2020, state Republican lawmakers introduced numerous bills restricting access to gender-affirming healthcare; the measures did not pass partly due to state legislatures adjourning due to the COVID-19 pandemic and forgoing committee votes on the measures. Efforts to pass the healthcare bans were renewed the following year: as of March 2021, the Williams Institute has documented legislation in 21 states that seek to prevent access to gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth. [1] Prior to HB 1570, Arkansas governor Asa Hutchinson had signed two bills criticized as targeting transgender people: Senate Bill 354, a transgender sports bill, and Senate Bill 289, a religious and moral exemptions bill for doctors.

HB 1570 was introduced in February 2021, and passed through the Arkansas General Assembly by March. Governor Asa Hutchinson vetoed the measure in April, but was overridden by the legislature. The law would have taken effect in July, but was stayed by a federal judge pending the outcome of a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union in May. An appeals court upheld the injunction in August 2022.

Supporters of the bill claim that gender transition procedures are experimental, that their long-term effects have not been established, and that minors need to be protected from making permanent changes to their bodies. Supporters include several conservative organizations and Republican politicians. Several national medical organizations have disputed the claims made by opponents and opposed the bill, including the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Some detractors and LGBT organizations have alleged that the bill represents the anti-transgender beliefs of its supporters. Governor Hutchinson argued that the bill represented "vast government overreach".

Provisions

HB 1570 bans doctors from providing any "gender transition procedures" to transgender people under 18, [2] defined as any medical or surgical service that alters a person's sex, [3] including puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and sex reassignment surgery. [4] The bill also prohibits doctors from referring patients to other providers for such treatment. [4] It does not include a grandfather clause for minors undergoing treatment at the time of the ban. [5] The bill contains specific exceptions to the ban on medical services for intersex medical interventions or patients dealing with complications from previous gender-related medical treatment. [6] Doctors who provide treatment in violation of the ban can be sued for damages or professionally sanctioned. [2] [3] [7]

HB 1570 also bans the use of public funds for and prohibits insurance from covering gender transition procedures for minors. [3]

Background

Gender-affirming healthcare is a type of healthcare that treats gender dysphoria—mental distress caused when a person's assigned sex at birth does not match their gender identity. [8] Gender-affirming healthcare for transgender youth is regulated by Standards of Care set by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. [9] Treatment for youth begins with therapy and counseling, and may progress to the use of puberty blockers depending on individuals' age and physical development; the medication halts puberty to give youth time to make a decision about their transition. [10] Hormone replacement therapy may be prescribed to youth around 16 years old, causing them to develop sexual characteristics associated with their gender. [10] Trans youth rarely undergo sex reassignment surgery because the Standards of Care require patients to be legally considered adults; some non-sex reassignment surgeries are performed for youth on a case-by-case basis. [11] Gender-affirming healthcare has been shown to improve trans youth's mental health, social acceptance and relations, and legal recognition. [12] It is recommended by several professional associations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Endocrine Society. [1] However, research on the long-term effects of puberty blockers is limited. [13] [14] [15]

Previous controversy surrounding transgender rights in the United States in the late 2010s focused primarily on "bathroom bills" that legally required transgender people to use bathrooms based on their assigned sex at birth, such as North Carolina's House Bill 2 in 2016. [16] [17] According to the Harvard Law Review , the debate about transgender healthcare for youth garnered national attention in October 2019 when "a dispute in Texas family court over parental rights for a seven-year-old transgender girl ignited outrage in conservative circles". [18] The journal asserted that conservative lobbying groups such as The Heritage Foundation and the Family Policy Alliance lobbied politicians throughout 2019 to introduce bills in legislative sessions banning gender-affirming healthcare for minors; measures were proposed in 15 states between January and March 2020. [19] None of the bills passed, partly due to state legislatures adjourning due to the COVID-19 pandemic and forgoing committee votes on the measures. [20]

Efforts to pass the healthcare bans were renewed the following year: as of March 2021, the Williams Institute, an LGBT-focused research institute, has documented legislation in 21 states that seek to prevent access to gender-affirming medical care for youth. [1] Bills in several states would penalize parents who seek out or otherwise facilitate gender-affirming healthcare. [1] Some, including HB 1570, would allow individuals to sue medical providers who violate the legislation in civil courts. [1] Three bills (HB 1570, and in Texas and South Carolina) contain insurance-related restrictions. [1]

Republican politicians have also introduced bills that would ban transgender youth from participating in youth sports. [16] As of early April 2021, three states (Arkansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee) had passed transgender sports bans, while state legislatures in over two dozen states were considering similar measures. [16]

Prior to HB 1570, Arkansas governor Asa Hutchinson had signed two bills criticized as targeting transgender people. [21] Senate Bill 354, a transgender sports bill, banned transgender women and girls from competing in women's sports teams in school. [22] Hutchinson also signed Senate Bill 289, which allows doctors to refuse to treat someone based on religious or moral objections; opponents claimed the legislation would give doctors and healthcare providers the ability to deny healthcare to LGBTQ patients. [23] Both bills were signed into law on March 26, 2021. [21]

According to the Williams Institute, there are 1,800 transgender people between the ages of 13 and 17 in Arkansas. [24]

History

HB 1570 was first read in the Arkansas House of Representatives on February 25, 2021. [25] Following its second reading on the same day, the bill was referred to the House's Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee, who passed the bill on March 9. [25] The bill passed the House 70–22 following its third reading on March 10, with 8 representatives non-voting. [25] [26] Following its first and second readings in the Arkansas Senate on March 10, HB 1570 was referred to the Senate's Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee, who passed the bill on March 22. [25] The Senate voted 28–7 to pass the bill following its third reading on March 29. [25] [27] Governor Hutchinson vetoed the bill on April 5. [28] The state legislature overrode the governor's veto the next day, with the House voting 71–24 with 3 representatives non-voting, [29] and the Senate voting 25–8 to pass the bill. [30]

HB 1570 would have taken effect on July 28, 2021, [31] but was stayed on July 21 by federal judge James Moody [32] pending a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on May 25 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas; [33] the ACLU argued that the statute violated the Constitution. [34] The Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in the litigation on June 17, asserting that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects transgender youth from discrimination in their access to medical care and also that HB 1570 violates the Constitution. [35]

An appeals court upheld the injunction in August 2022. [36]

Starting on October 17, 2022, a two-week long federal trial in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas regarding the legality of HB 1570 began. [36] The lawsuit leading to the trial was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), four families of transgender youth, and two doctors. [36]

The bill makes Arkansas the first U.S. state to make gender transition procedures illegal. [6]

In 2021, U.S. District Judge Jay Moody issued a temporary injunction on the law before it could take effect. Moody then issued a permanent injunction on the law in May 2022. A three judge panel from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the injunction in August 2022. In September 2023, Attorney General Tim Griffin asked the full panel of judges from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider the ruling as opposed to a three judge panel. [37] In October 2023, the court granted his request. [38] On April 11, 2024, ten judges on the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments over whether to reinstate the law. Chief Judge Steven Colloton said a decision will be issued "in due course." [39]

Reactions

Support

Supporters of the bill claimed that gender transition procedures are experimental and that their long-term effects have not been established. HB 1570's author, state Representative Robin Lundstrum (R–87), [21] argued that her support was driven by science, saying she consulted medical experts while writing the bill; [40] she referenced one Swedish study from 2011 finding that transgender people who underwent sex reassignment surgery were more likely to suffer mental health issues and commit suicide than the general population. [5] [lower-alpha 1] Primary Senate sponsor Alan Clark (R–13) described gender-affirming treatment as experimental and potentially life-threatening, arguing that the bill would "protect children from making mistakes that they will have a very difficult time coming back from." [42] Republican Attorney General Leslie Rutledge said that the bill "is about protecting children", adding that "Nothing about this law prohibits someone after the age of 18 from making this decision. What we’re doing in Arkansas is protecting children from life-altering, permanent decisions." [43]

Family Council, a conservative organization in Arkansas, claimed that the long-term effects of gender-affirming healthcare are unknown, while Vernadette Broyles, president of the law firm Child & Parental Rights Campaign, characterized the banned treatments as "unethical experimentation on [children's] developing bodies." [2] The American College of Pediatricians, a socially conservative group, said that "affirming gender discordance too early will push young people to transition." [44]

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, while running in the 2022 Arkansas gubernatorial election, said she supported HB 1570 and would have signed it if she were governor. [45] Both of her opponents in the race, Democrat Chris Jones and Libertarian Ricky Harrington Jr., said that they would have vetoed the legislation. [46]

Opposition

The bill garnered criticism from several national medical organizations regarding its scientific accuracy. Major professional associations including the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the Endocrine Society opposed the measure, disputing the claim that gender-affirming healthcare is experimental and harmful. [7] American Academy of Pediatrics president Lee Beers described the bill as "discrimination by legislation", [47] while the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry expressed concern about "state-based legislation regarding the treatment of transgender youth that directly oppose the evidence based care". [7] Gary Wheeler, a senior figure in the Arkansas chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, claimed that outside interest groups lobbied Arkansas lawmakers and polarized the issue; the Human Rights Campaign accused groups like The Heritage Foundation, the Alliance Defending Freedom, and the Eagle Forum of promoting the legislation.[ citation needed ] Wheeler alleged that supporters of the bill cherry-picked information and misread scientific studies.[ citation needed ] Noting that transgender youth healthcare is typically undertaken only after discussions between the patient, their parents, and physicians, Beers argued the bill would violate the physician-patient relationship by preventing doctors from providing care for transgender patients. [5]

Some detractors and LGBT organizations have alleged that the bill represents anti-transgender beliefs by its supporters. Rumba Yambú, the director of the Arkansas transgender support organization Intratransitive, claimed that HB 1570 was "one of the worst bills that [the legislature] could have created", [48] while Lambda Legal CEO Kevin Jennings said that measures like HB 1570 "are rooted in animus and ignorance about what it means to be transgender." [5] Writer Jennifer Finney Boylan claimed in The New York Times that conservative supporters of the bill were using concern for children as a pretense to express anti-transgender sentiment. [49] Contending that HB 1570 and similar bills across the country "come from a place of emotional incoherence", The Washington Post columnist Monica Hesse asserted that the measures are based on "a combination of ignorance and discomfort" around transgender people. [50] Writing in The Atlantic , law professor Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr. argued that the bill violated the Fourteenth Amendment, conflicting with the Equal Protection Clause and with "the Constitution's guarantee of personal liberty" by discriminating against transgender people, and the Due Process Clause by interfering with the right of parents to raise their children. [51]

In June 2021, Rob Bonta, the Attorney General of California, announced that the state would no longer provide non-essential state-funded travel to five states [lower-alpha 2] which had passed anti-LGBT laws, including Arkansas. [52] [53]

Veto by Asa Hutchinson

Governor Asa Hutchinson vetoed the bill on April 5, 2021, saying he feared it would set "new standards of legislative interference" and represented "vast government overreach". [28] Asserting that he would have signed a bill that only banned sex reassignment surgery for transgender youth, [21] Hutchinson also voiced concerns that the bill was part of a "culture war" fought by conservatism and argued that it would prove politically damaging to the Republican Party by "reflecting intolerance and reflecting a lack of diversity." [54] The veto was overridden the next day by the legislature. [30]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ The study also found that "surgeries eased gender dysphoria". [21] The authors of the study concluded that "Persons with transsexualism, after sex reassignment, have considerably higher risks for mortality, suicidal behaviour, and psychiatric morbidity than the general population. Our findings suggest that sex reassignment, although alleviating gender dysphoria, may not suffice as treatment for transsexualism, and should inspire improved psychiatric and somatic care after sex reassignment for this patient group." [41]
  2. ↑ California had previously banned state-funded travel (with limited exceptions) to twelve states; the new ban increases the number of banned states to seventeen. [52]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Utah</span>

The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Utah have significantly evolved in the 21st century. Protective laws have become increasingly enacted since 2014, despite the state's reputation as socially conservative and highly religious. Utah's anti-sodomy law was invalidated in 2003 by Lawrence v. Texas, and fully repealed by the state legislature in 2019. Same-sex marriage has been legal since the state's ban was ruled unconstitutional by federal courts in 2014. In addition, statewide anti-discrimination laws now cover sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and housing, and the use of conversion therapy on minors is prohibited. In spite of this, there are still a few differences between the treatment of LGBTQ people and the rest of the population, and the rights of transgender youth are restricted.

In the United States, the rights of transgender people vary considerably by jurisdiction. In recent decades, there has been an expansion of federal, state, and local laws and rulings to protect transgender Americans; however, many rights remain unprotected, and some rights are being eroded. Since 2020, there has been a national movement by conservative/right-wing politicians and organizations to target transgender rights. There has been a steady increase in the number of anti-transgender bills introduced each year, especially in Republican-led states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Alabama</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals in the U.S. state of Alabama have federal protections, but still face legal challenges and discrimination on the state level that is not experienced by non-LGBT residents. LGBTQ rights in Alabama—a Republican Party stronghold located in both the Deep South and greater Bible Belt—are severely limited in comparison to other states. As one of the most socially conservative states in the U.S., Alabama is one of the only two states along with neighboring Mississippi where opposition to same-sex marriage outnumbers support.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in West Virginia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of West Virginia face legal challenges not faced by non-LGBT persons. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1976, and same-sex marriage has been recognized since October 2014. West Virginia statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Florida</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Florida have federal protections, but many face legal difficulties on the state level that are not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity became legal in the state after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas on June 26, 2003, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy law. Same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since January 6, 2015. Discrimination on account of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations is outlawed following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County. In addition, several cities and counties, comprising about 55 percent of Florida's population, have enacted anti-discrimination ordinances. These include Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa, Orlando, St. Petersburg, Tallahassee and West Palm Beach, among others. Conversion therapy is also banned in a number of cities in the state, mainly in the Miami metropolitan area, but has been struck down by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. In September 2023, Lake Worth Beach, Florida became an official "LGBT sanctuary city" to protect and defend LGBT rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Wisconsin</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Wisconsin enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. However, the transgender community may face some legal issues not experienced by cisgender residents, due in part to discrimination based on gender identity not being included in Wisconsin's anti-discrimination laws, nor is it covered in the state's hate crime law. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Wisconsin since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Wolf v. Walker. Discrimination based on sexual orientation is banned statewide in Wisconsin, and sexual orientation is a protected class in the state's hate crime laws. It approved such protections in 1982, making it the first state in the United States to do so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Oregon</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Oregon have the same legal rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Oregon, and same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since May 2014 when a federal judge declared the state's ban on such marriages unconstitutional. Previously, same-sex couples could only access domestic partnerships, which guaranteed most of the rights of marriage. Additionally, same-sex couples are allowed to jointly adopt, and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the areas of employment, housing and public accommodations is outlawed in the state under the Oregon Equality Act, enacted in 2008. Conversion therapy on minors is also illegal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Arkansas</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Arkansas face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arkansas. Same-sex marriage became briefly legal through a court ruling on May 9, 2014, subject to court stays and appeals. In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that laws banning same-sex marriage are unconstitutional, legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States nationwide including in Arkansas. Nonetheless, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity was not banned in Arkansas until the Supreme Court banned it nationwide in Bostock v. Clayton County in 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Arizona</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Arizona may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arizona, and same-sex couples are able to marry and adopt. Nevertheless, the state provides only limited protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Several cities, including Phoenix and Tucson, have enacted ordinances to protect LGBTQ people from unfair discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Missouri</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Missouri face some legal challenges not experienced by other residents throughout the state, excluding St. Louis, Kansas City, and Columbia. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Missouri, in accordance with 2003's Lawrence v. Texas decision. In 2006, Missouri codified the legality of same-sex sexual activity into its statutory law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Indiana</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Indiana have been shaped by both state and federal law. These evolved from harsh penalties established early in the state's history to the decriminalization of same-sex activity in 1977 and the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2014. Indiana was subject to an April 2017 federal court ruling that discrimination based on sexual orientation is tantamount to discrimination on account of "sex", as defined by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The ruling establishes sexual orientation as a protected characteristic in the workplace, forbidding unfair discrimination, although Indiana state statutes do not include sexual orientation or gender identity among its categories of discrimination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Tennessee</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Tennessee may experience some legal challenges that non-LGBTQ residents do not. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in the state since 1996. Marriage licenses have been issued to same-sex couples in Tennessee since the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in South Dakota</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of South Dakota may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in South Dakota, and same-sex marriages have been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Kentucky</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Kentucky still face some legal challenges not experienced by other people. Same-sex sexual activity in Kentucky has been legally permitted since 1992, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy statute for same-sex couples. Same-sex marriage is legal in Kentucky under the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. The decision, which struck down Kentucky's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages and all other same-sex marriage bans elsewhere in the country, was handed down on June 26, 2015.

Detransition is the cessation or reversal of a transgender identification or of gender transition, temporarily or permanently, through social, legal, and/or medical means. The term is distinct from the concept of 'regret', and the decision may be based on a shift in gender identity, or other reasons, such as health concerns, social or economic pressure, discrimination, stigma, political beliefs, or religious beliefs.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2021.

Gary N. Click is an American politician, the Ohio state representative from its 88th district. He won the seat in 2020, after incumbent Republican Bill Reineke left it to run for the Ohio Senate, defeating Democrat Chris Liebold 62.9% to 37.1%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine</span> Organization opposing transgender rights

The Society For Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM) is a non-profit organization that is known for its opposition to gender-affirming care for transgender youth and for engaging in political lobbying. The group routinely cites the unproven concept of rapid-onset gender dysphoria and has falsely claimed that conversion therapy techniques are only practiced on the basis of sexual orientation rather than gender identity. SEGM is often cited in anti-transgender legislation and court cases, sometimes filing court briefs. It is not recognized as a scientific organization by the international medical community.

Quentin Van Meter is a pediatric endocrinologist and president of the American College of Pediatricians, a socially conservative advocacy group which is known for opposing gay marriage, gender reassignment surgery, and abortion. He has advocated and referred his clients to conversion therapy and is known for rejecting the medical consensus on the efficacy and safety of transgender health care.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020s anti-LGBT movement in the United States</span> Political backlash against LGBT people

The 2020s anti-LGBT movement in the United States is an ongoing political backlash from social conservatives against LGBT people. It has included legislative proposals of bathroom use restrictions, bans on gender-affirming care, anti-LGBT curriculum laws, laws against drag performances, book bans, boycotts, and conspiracy theories around grooming. Between 2018 and 2023, hundreds of anti-LGBT laws were considered, with more than one hundred passed into law.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Conron, Kerith J.; O'Neill, Kathryn; Vasquez, Luis A. (April 2021). "Prohibiting Gender-Affirming Medical Care for Youth" (PDF). Williams Institute . Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-06-07. Retrieved 2021-06-06– via eScholarship.
  2. 1 2 3 Wheeler, Lydia (April 27, 2021). "Legal Fight Brews Over Ban on Medical Care for Transgender Kids". Bloomberg Law . Archived from the original on May 19, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 Arkansas Act 626, 93rd General Assembly, Regular Session, 2021. PDF Archived 2021-05-01 at the Wayback Machine
  4. 1 2 Pengelly, Martin (April 5, 2021). "Arkansas governor vetoes bill banning medical treatment for young trans people". Guardian US . Archived from the original on April 5, 2021. Retrieved April 6, 2021.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Ramirez, Marc (April 12, 2021). "'Children will die': Transgender advocates warn about risks as more states consider banning gender-affirming care for kids". USA Today . Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  6. 1 2 Cole, Devan (April 6, 2021). "Arkansas becomes first state to outlaw gender-affirming treatment for trans youth". CNN . Archived from the original on May 19, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  7. 1 2 3 Reardon, Sara (April 9, 2021). "New Arkansas Law—and Similar Bills—Endanger Transgender Youth, Research Shows" . Scientific American . Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  8. ↑ Harvard Law Review (2021), p. 2165.
  9. ↑ Harvard Law Review (2021), pp. 2165–2166.
  10. 1 2 Harvard Law Review (2021), p. 2166.
  11. ↑ Harvard Law Review (2021), p. 2167.
  12. ↑ Harvard Law Review (2021), pp. 2167–2172.
  13. ↑ "As children line up at gender clinics, families confront many unknowns". Reuters. 6 October 2022. Retrieved 10 October 2022.
  14. ↑ Rosenthal SM (December 2016). "Transgender youth: current concepts". Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 21 (4): 185–192. doi:10.6065/apem.2016.21.4.185. PMC   5290172 . PMID   28164070. The primary risks of pubertal suppression in gender dysphoric youth treated with GnRH agonists include adverse effects on bone mineralization, compromised fertility, and unknown effects on brain development.
  15. ↑ de Vries AL, Cohen-Kettenis PT (2012). "Clinical management of gender dysphoria in children and adolescents: the Dutch approach". Journal of Homosexuality . 59 (3): 301–20. doi:10.1080/00918369.2012.653300. PMID   22455322. S2CID   11731779.
  16. 1 2 3 Hansen, Claire (April 9, 2021). "Republican State Lawmakers Push Wave of Bills Targeting Transgender Youth". U.S. News & World Report . Archived from the original on June 4, 2021. Retrieved June 7, 2021.
  17. ↑ Peters, Jeremy W. (March 29, 2021). "Why Transgender Girls Are Suddenly the G.O.P.'s Culture-War Focus" . The New York Times . Archived from the original on June 2, 2021. Retrieved June 7, 2021.
  18. ↑ Harvard Law Review (2021), p. 2172.
  19. ↑ Harvard Law Review (2021), p. 2172-2174.
  20. ↑ Harvard Law Review (2021), p. 2174.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 Bryan, Max (April 5, 2021). "Hutchinson vetoes bill banning youth gender reassignment, calling it 'overbroad, extreme'". Southwest Times Record . Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  22. ↑ "Arkansas governor signs transgender sports ban into law". NBC News . Associated Press. March 26, 2021. Archived from the original on May 9, 2021. Retrieved June 7, 2021.
  23. ↑ DeMillo, Andrew (March 26, 2021). "Arkansas governor signs medical conscience objections law". Associated Press . Archived from the original on June 2, 2021. Retrieved June 7, 2021.
  24. ↑ "How Many Adults and Youth Identify as Transgender in the United States?" (PDF). Williams Institute. June 2022. Retrieved 2022-10-22.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 "HB1570 Bill Information". Arkansas State Legislature . Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  26. ↑ "HB1570 House Vote". Arkansas State Legislature . March 10, 2021. Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  27. ↑ "HB1570 Senate Vote". Arkansas State Legislature . March 29, 2021. Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  28. 1 2 Romo, Vanessa (April 5, 2021). "Arkansas Governor Vetoes Ban On Gender-Affirming Care For Trans Youth". NPR . Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved April 6, 2021.
  29. ↑ "HB1570 House Vote". Arkansas State Legislature . April 6, 2021. Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  30. 1 2 Deliso, Meredith (April 6, 2021). "Arkansas state legislature overrides governor's veto on transgender health care bill". ABC News . Archived from the original on April 6, 2021. Retrieved April 6, 2021.
  31. ↑ Lukpat, Alyssa; Paz, Isabella Grullón (July 21, 2021). "Judge Temporarily Blocks Arkansas Ban on Health Treatments for Transgender Youth" . The New York Times . Archived from the original on July 26, 2021. Retrieved September 27, 2021.
  32. ↑ Cathey, Libby (July 21, 2021). "Judge blocks Arkansas law banning health care for transgender youth". ABC News . Archived from the original on September 10, 2021. Retrieved October 3, 2021.
  33. ↑ "ACLU Sues Arkansas Over Ban on Health Care for Transgender Youth". American Civil Liberties Union . May 25, 2021. Archived from the original on May 26, 2021. Retrieved May 28, 2021.
  34. ↑ Yurcaba, Jo (May 26, 2021). "ACLU sues Arkansas over transgender health care ban". NBC News . Archived from the original on May 26, 2021. Retrieved May 28, 2021.
  35. ↑ Ronan, Wyatt (June 17, 2021). "Biden Admin's Dept. of Justice Moves To Protect Transgender Young People Against Anti-Transgender State Legislation That Discriminates in West Virginia & Arkansas". Human Rights Campaign . Archived from the original on July 24, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2021.
  36. 1 2 3 "Trial Begins Over Arkansas Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth". Time. Retrieved 2022-10-19.
  37. ↑ Dale Ellis (8 September 2023). "AG asks federal appeals court to reconsider decision against state's transgender health care ban". Arkansas Democrat-Gazette . Retrieved 19 June 2024.
  38. ↑ Grant Lancaster (7 October 2023). "Full U.S. 8th Circuit agrees to hear state's transgender health care appeal". Arkansas Democrat-Gazette . Retrieved 19 June 2024.
  39. ↑ Andrew Delillo; Jim Salter (11 April 2024). "Federal appeals court hears arguments on nation's first ban on gender-affirming care for minors". AP News. Retrieved 19 June 2024.
  40. ↑ Lockwood, Frank E. (April 25, 2021). "Originator of state law views it as 1-of-a-kind". Arkansas Democrat-Gazette . Archived from the original on April 25, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
  41. ↑ Dhejne, Cecilia; Lichtenstein, Paul; Boman, Marcus; Johansson, Anna L.V.; Långström, Niklas; Landén, Mikael (2011). "Long-Term Follow-Up of Transsexual Persons Undergoing Sex Reassignment Surgery: Cohort Study in Sweden". PLoS ONE . 6 (2): e16885. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...616885D. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016885 . PMC   3043071 . PMID   21364939.
  42. ↑ Wax-Thibodeaux, Emily (April 25, 2021). "After Arkansas passes its trans ban, parents and teens wonder: Should we stay?" . The Washington Post . Archived from the original on May 23, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  43. ↑ "Landmark trial begins over Arkansas' ban on transgender youth care". NBC News. 17 October 2022. Retrieved 2022-10-19.
  44. ↑ Trotta, Daniel (March 29, 2021). "Arkansas legislature votes to ban transgender treatments for youth". Reuters . Archived from the original on April 2, 2021. Retrieved May 27, 2021.
  45. ↑ Liz Crampton (16 November 2022). "New Governor 101: A primer on the 9 incoming state executives". Politico . Retrieved 16 November 2022.
  46. ↑ Virginia Aabram (21 October 2022). "Sarah Sanders breaks with Arkansas governor on transgender medical care for minors". Washington Examiner . Retrieved 16 November 2022.
  47. ↑ Schmidt, Samantha (March 29, 2021). "Arkansas passes bill restricting access to medical treatments for transgender children" . The Washington Post . Archived from the original on April 7, 2021. Retrieved May 27, 2021.
  48. ↑ Yurcaba, Jo (March 29, 2021). "Arkansas passes bill to ban gender-affirming care for trans youth". NBC News . Archived from the original on April 6, 2021. Retrieved April 6, 2021.
  49. ↑ Finney Boylan, Jennifer (April 7, 2021). "Keeping Trans Kids From Medicine Doesn't Make Them Disappear" . Opinion. The New York Times . Archived from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  50. ↑ Hesse, Monica (April 9, 2021). "The GOP's anti-trans bills are ignorance in action" . The Washington Post . Archived from the original on April 15, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  51. ↑ Krotoszynski, Jr., Ronald J. (May 16, 2021). "The War on Trans Kids Is Totally Unconstitutional". The Atlantic . Archived from the original on May 18, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  52. 1 2 "California bans state travel to 5 states over anti-LGBTQ 'bigotry'". NBC News . Associated Press. June 29, 2021. Archived from the original on July 11, 2021. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
  53. ↑ Sprayregen, Molly (June 29, 2021). "California bans state-funded travel to five states with anti-LGBTQ laws". LGBTQ Nation . Archived from the original on July 7, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2021.
  54. ↑ Lerer, Lisa (April 8, 2021). "Asa Hutchinson on Arkansas's Anti-Trans Law and the G.O.P. Culture Wars" . The New York Times . Archived from the original on May 18, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2021.

Works cited

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.