Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019

Last updated

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
Parliament of India
  • An Act to provide for protection of rights of transgender persons and their welfare and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.
CitationAct No. 40 of 2019
Territorial extent Republic of India
Passed by Parliament of India
Passed5 August 2019
Passed26 November 2019
Assented to5 December 2019
Signed5 December 2019
Commenced10 January 2020
Legislative history
Bill titleThe Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019
Bill citationBill No. 169 of 2019
Introduced byMinister for Social Justice and Empowerment
Introduced19 July 2019
First reading 5 August 2019
Committee report 43rd Report by Standing Committee on Social Justice and Empowerment, July 2017
Related legislation
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2018
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2016
The Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014
Status: In force

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 is an act of the Parliament of India with the objective to provide for protection of rights of transgender people, their welfare, and other related matters. [1] The act was introduced in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Parliament, on 19 July 2019 by the Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment, Thawar Chand Gehlot, in light of the lapse of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2018 (Bill No. 210-C of 2016). The 2019 act and the immediately preceding 2018 bill, were both preceded by a 2016 version. They were met with protests and criticism by some transgender people, lawyers, and activists in India. The 2016 bill was sent to a standing committee which submitted its report in July 2017. Following this, the Lok Sabha tabled and passed a newer version of the bill in December 2018. However, it did not incorporate many of the committee's recommendations. Although members of the opposition criticised the 2019 act and assured activists that they would not vote in favour of it, it was passed by the Lok Sabha on 5 August 2019 and by the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Parliament, on 26 November 2019. The president assented to it on 5 December 2019, upon which the act was published in the Gazette of India . It has been in effect since 10 January 2020 following a notification of the same in the Gazette on the same day.

Contents

Following protests by the queer community against the 2016 and 2018 bills, the 2019 act has done away with few of the severely criticised provisions of the 2018 bill, such as the criminalisation of begging and the establishment of a district screening committee to process applications for issuance of transgender person certificates. However, it fails to incorporate yet other principles in line with the Supreme Court judgment in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (NALSA v. UOI) in 2014, such as the right of transgender people to declare their self-perceived gender identity without undergoing sex reassignment surgery, and reservations in jobs and educational institutions. The act has also been criticised for imposing less punishment for crimes against transgender people compared with punishment for crimes against cisgender people. On 27 January 2020, the Supreme Court issued a notice to the central government in a petition challenging the constitutionality of the act.

In January 2014, while judicial pronouncement in the NALSA petition was pending, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment published an Expert Committee Report on issues relating to transgender people, after consultations with transgender people. Tiruchi Siva, of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party, had introduced the Rights of Transgender Persons Bill in 2014, in the Rajya Sabha, which was passed by the house in 2015. It stayed pending in the Lok Sabha, during which the 2016 bill was tabled, and lapsed following the dissolution of the house prior to the 2019 general elections. Parties such as the Indian National Congress and Communist Party of India (Marxist) had promised in their respective electoral manifestoes for the 2019 elections to, respectively, withdraw the 2018 bill — while introducing a new one consulting members of the queer community — and pass one based on the 2014 bill.

History and background

Hijras in eastern Bengal, circa 1860 Hijra and companions in Eastern Bengal.jpg
Hijras in eastern Bengal, circa 1860

On 15 April 2014, the Supreme Court of India delivered its judgment in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (NALSA v. UOI), in which it recognised the rights of transgender people in India and laid down a series of measures for securing transgender people's rights by mandating the prohibition of discrimination, recommending the creation of welfare policies, and reservations for transgender people in educational institutions and jobs. [2] The judgment upheld the right of a transgender person to self-perceived gender identity, guaranteed by the Constitution of India, in the absence of sex reassignment surgery. [3] The 2014 judicial mandate was affirmed by the judgments of the Supreme Court in Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and anr. v. Union of India and ors. (2017) and Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018). [4] The judgment in NALSA v. UOI also noted the presence of transgender people in India throughout its history, and made reference to the hijra, kinnar, and jogta communities, spread across the country and elsewhere in the Indian subcontinent. [5] [6]

While the decision in the NALSA petition was still pending, an Expert Committee Report on issues relating to transgender people was published in January 2014, [7] after consultations by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment with transgender people in August 2013. [8] [9] In this context, Tiruchi Siva of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party introduced a private member's bill in the Rajya Sabha, namely the Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014 (Bill No. 49 of 2014). [10] [11]

The government had initially asked Siva to withdraw the bill due to there being "some anomalies" in the text; however, the opposition had a majority in the house and the bill was unanimously passed by the Rajya Sabha on 24 April 2015. [10] The bill was welcomed by queer rights activists in India. [12] However, some transgender people noted their absence from the entire process and called for their recommendations to be sought. [13] [14] The Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014 was the first private member's bill to be passed by the Rajya Sabha in thirty-six years [15] and by the Parliament as a whole in forty-five years. [16] Between 1947 and 2015, only sixteen private member's bills were passed. [17]

The 2014 bill underwent significant changes when the government drafted its own version of the bill, omitting provisions in the 2014 bill. [18] After recommendations were received from transgender people, the bill was sent to the Ministry of Law and Justice. [18] It came to be known as the Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2015. [19] Later, on 26 February 2016, the bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha for debate by Baijayant Panda of the Biju Janata Dal party. [20] He argued that the bill would help extend constitutional rights and end discrimination against transgender people, allowing them to live a life of dignity. [20] The bill was discussed in the Lok Sabha on 29 April 2016. [21] Siva stated that he will not be withdrawing the 2014 bill. [22]

While the 2014 bill passed by the Rajya Sabha was still pending, [23] the government tabled the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2016 (Bill No. 210 of 2016), on 2 August 2016, following the reconstitution of the Lok Sabha after the 2014 general elections. [24] The 2016 bill had various provisions which were reportedly regressive and inferior to those in the 2014 bill. [25] [26] The bill was met with criticism and protests from Indian transgender people and was referred to the standing committee, which submitted its report in July 2018. [26] The Lok Sabha tabled and passed a newer version of the bill with twenty-seven amendments on 17 December 2018. [27] [28] The bill was once again met with severe criticism and protests across India, as it overlooked the recommendations made by the standing committee and the suggestions that had been offered by transgender people. [29] [30] The 2018 bill lapsed due to the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. [31] With the house's dissolution, the Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014 that was still pending before the Lok Sabha also lapsed. [32]

Following the reconstitution of the Lok Sabha after the 2019 general elections, the bill was reintroduced on 19 July 2019 by the Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment, Thawar Chand Gehlot. [33] Before this the bill had been approved by the union cabinet on 10 July 2019. [34] The bill was passed by a voice vote in the Lok Sabha on 5 August 2019, amidst commotion in the house following the revocation of the state of Jammu and Kashmir's special status by the Parliament on the same day. [35] [36] The bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha by Thawarchand Gehlot on 20 November 2019, upon which it was passed without any amendments on 26 November 2019 following a motion to refer it to a select committee that failed by 77 noes against 55 ayes. [37] [38] [39] The bill received presidential assent on 5 December 2019, following which the Ministry of Law and Justice published it in the Gazette of India as Act No. 40 of 2019. [40] [41] The act came has been in effect since 10 January 2020 after a notification of the same in the Gazette by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. [42] [43]

Statutory provisions

The 2018 bill criminalised begging, which many transgender people in India, such as the hijras and jogtas, engage in as a ritual-custom, while some rely on it for livelihood. [44] It had also mandated applications be made to the district magistrate for screening through a district screening committee before the issuance of transgender person certificates. [44] [45] The screening committee was to be composed of five people including a chief medical officer, district social welfare officer, psychologist/psychiatrist, and a representative of transgender people. [46] [47] The 2018 bill had also not provided for mandatory reservations for transgender people and mandated lower punishment for crimes against transgender people, as compared to punishment for crimes against cisgender people under the Indian Penal Code. [26] [28] It also ensured a family-life for transgender children, by prohibiting their separation from their family, without taking into account harassment and discrimination they may face within their family as a result of which they may voluntarily choose to be separated and to reside instead with other transgender people. [48] [49] A transgender child, as per the provisions, can be separated from their family only by a court order. [29] Similar to the 2019 statute, the 2018 bill also required one to undergo sex reassignment surgery to be legally recognised as a man or a woman in official documents. [50] The 2019 act does away with only a few of the criticised provisions of the 2018 bill, such as the district screening committee and the criminalisation of begging. [51]

The statutory provisions of the 2019 act prohibit discrimination against transgender people. [51] Similar to the 2018 bill, the 2019 act includes intersex people, hijras, jogtas, and kinnars within its definition of transgender people, [50] [52] as well as trans-men, trans-women, and genderqueers, though these latter terms are undefined. [50] [53] Both the 2019 act as well as the 2018 bill describe a transgender person as someone whose gender does not match with the gender assigned to them at birth. [50] [54]

Under the provisions of the 2019 act, a transgender person can apply to the district magistrate for a transgender person certificate which will give them the right to change the name on their birth certificate and have all documents updated accordingly. [55] However, similar to the 2018 bill provisions, a transgender person can be identified as male or female only after applying for a revised certificate to the district magistrate, post sex reassignment surgery. [56]

The 2019 act also protects transgender children and provides for states and institutions to come up with adequate policies to ensure the welfare of transgender people. [57] [49] Similar to the provisions of the 2018 bill, under the provisions of the 2019 act a transgender child can be separated from their family by a court order. [29] However, unlike the Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014 neither the 2018 bill nor the 2019 act provide for reservations for transgender people in educational institutions and jobs. [33] The 2014 bill had provided for two per-cent reservations in educational institutions and public employment. [58] Similar to the 2018 bill, the 2019 act provides for punishment for crimes against transgender people, which stands as an imprisonment for a term not less than six months but which may extend to two years and a fine. [26] [53] The 2019 act, as well as the 2018 bill, also provide for the creation of a National Council for Transgender Persons. [35] [59]

On 18 April 2020, the government published Draft Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Rules, 2020 in exercise of its powers under the 2019 statute, seeking comments and suggestions on the same from the public. [60]

Criticism and reactions

Protests against the 2018 bill in Mumbai, in December 2018 Protest against Transgender Bill in Mumbai, India.jpg
Protests against the 2018 bill in Mumbai, in December 2018

The 2018 bill passed by the Lok Sabha was widely criticised by transgender people, activists, students, and lawyers. [61] Transgender people protested in various cities in India calling the provisions regressive and in violation of the Supreme Court's 2014 judgment in NALSA v. UOI. [28] [26] The criminalisation of begging under the 2018 bill was to affect transgender people in India, such as hijras and jogtas, who engage in begging as a ritual-custom while some rely on it for livelihood. [45] [44] It was alleged by critics that the provision establishing the district screening committees left gaps for incompetence and prejudice. [48] Hindustan Times reported that even if the provision of a district screening committee existed to prevent imposters from seeking benefits of government welfare schemes, such an arrangement cannot be made at the expense of transgender people's right to self-determination. [62] The definition of transgender people under the 2018 bill, retained by the 2019 act, was reported by Frontline to be different than how transgender identity is understood internationally. [50]

The 2018 bill and 2019 act have been met with protests by transgender people. [63] The day of their passing has been referred to some transgender people as a "black day" and as "gender justice murder day". [41] [25] [64] Others described them as "draconian and discriminatory". [65] After the 2018 bill was passed by the Lok Sabha in December, members of the opposition in the Rajya Sabha had stated they will not let the bill pass in its present form in the Rajya Sabha. [66] Protestors alleged the 2018 bill institutionalises violence and decried what they saw as neglect of the recommendations made by the standing committee and by transgender people. [67] Transgender people called the requirement of applications to be made to the district magistrate for issuance of transgender certificates, the lesser punishment for crimes against transgender people, and the absence of provisions on mandatory reservations for transgender people regressive to the judicial mandate of the Supreme Court in 2014 in NALSA v. UOI, thereby violating their right to equality and other fundamental rights. [67] [68]

In the run-up to the 2019 general elections to the Lok Sabha, the Indian National Congress had promised in its electoral manifesto to withdraw the 2018 bill and introduce a new one, in consultation with members of the queer community. [69] [70] The Communist Party of India (Marxist) supported the passing of the 2014 bill in its electoral manifesto. [69] In April 2019, transgender rights activist Laxmi Narayan Tripathi, met the then Bharatiya Janata Party National General Secretary, Ram Madhav, asking the party to introduce a revised bill if it were to return to power. [71] Madhav assured her that he would address the concerns of the transgender community. [71] Soon after news reported that the 2019 bill was approved by the union cabinet, transgender rights activists held a press conference in Delhi to address the issue. [72] On 24 November 2019, two days before the bill was passed by the parliament, protests were staged by the queer community in New Delhi and Bengaluru as part of the Delhi queer pride parade and the Bengaluru Namma Pride March, respectively. [73] [74] [75] The legislation also drew criticism from the All India Mahila Congress and opposition from parliamentarians including Jaya Bachchan and Sasmit Patra, while Derek O'Brien and Tiruchi Siva also expressed their concerns before the house. [38] [75] [76] After the legislation was passed by the parliament, transgender people and activists protested against the legislation, organised meetings to address the situation, and urged the president not to sign and give his assent to the bill. [77] [75] [78] There were also protests by the queer community against the act as part of the Mumbai pride parade in February 2020. [79] [80]

The legislation has been criticised by Human Rights Watch and the International Commission of Jurists. [81] [82] On 27 January 2020, the Supreme Court issued a notice requiring the central government to respond in a petition challenging the constitutionality of the 2019 legislation, filed by judge [83] and transgender rights activist Swati Bidhan Baruah. [84] [85] On 12 June 2020, the Supreme Court issued notice to the government in another petition filed challenging the constitutionality of the statute, tagging it with the petition filed by Baruah. [86]

The Act has been criticised for overlooking the demand of transgender community for reservations in the matter of appointment which was recommended in NALSA judgment (2014) by The Supreme Court of India. The Act also provides for punishment of up to two years for sexual abuse of transgender persons which is significantly less than the permission for sexual assault of women. [87]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rajya Sabha</span> Upper house of the Parliament of India

The Rajya Sabha, also known as the Council of States, is the upper house of the bicameral Parliament of India. As of 2023, it has a maximum membership of 245, of which 233 are elected by the legislatures of the states and union territories using single transferable votes through open ballots, while the president can appoint 12 members for their contributions to art, literature, science, and social service. The total allowed capacity is 250 according to article 80 of the Indian Constitution. The current potential seating capacity of the Rajya Sabha is 245, after the Jammu and Kashmir (Reorganisation) Act. The maximum seats of 250 members can be filled up at the discretion and requirements of the house of Rajya Sabha.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lok Sabha</span> Lower house of the Parliament of India

The Lok Sabha, also known as the House of the People, is the lower house of India's bicameral Parliament, with the upper house being the Rajya Sabha. Members of the Lok Sabha are elected by an adult universal suffrage and a first-past-the-post system to represent their respective constituencies, and they hold their seats for five years or until the body is dissolved by the president on the advice of the council of ministers. The house meets in the Lok Sabha Chambers of the Parliament House, New Delhi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament of India</span> Bicameral legislature of India

The Parliament of India or Indian Parliament, is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India. It is a bicameral legislature composed of the Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha. The president of India, in their role as head of the legislature, has full powers to summon and prorogue either house of Parliament or to dissolve the Lok Sabha, but they can exercise these powers only upon the advice of the prime minister and the Union Council of Ministers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vice President of India</span> Second-highest constitutional office of India

The vice president of India is the deputy to the head of state of the Republic of India, i.e. the president of India. The office of vice president is the second-highest constitutional office after the president and ranks second in the order of precedence and first in the line of succession to the presidency. The vice president is also the ex officio chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

India has a parliamentary system as defined by its constitution, with power distributed between the union government and the states. India's democracy is the largest democracy in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in India</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in India face legal and social challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ people. There are no legal restrictions against gay sex within India. Same-sex couples have some limited cohabitation rights, colloquially known as live-in relationships. However, India does not currently provide for common-law marriage, same-sex marriage, civil union, guardianship, unregistered cohabitation or issue partnership certificates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sharad Yadav</span> Indian politician (1947–2023)

Sharad Yadav was an Indian politician from the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) party. He was elected to the Lok Sabha seven times and to the Rajya Sabha four times from JD(U). He was the first national president of Janata Dal (United), serving from its formation in 2003 until 2016. He was disqualified from the Rajya Sabha in 2017 and removed from party leadership positions for engaging in anti-party activities.

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act is an Indian law aimed at the prevention of unlawful activities associations in India. Its main objective was to make powers available for dealing with activities directed against the integrity and sovereignty of India. The most recent amendment of the law, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 2019 has made it possible for the Union Government to designate individuals as terrorists without following any formal judicial process. UAPA is also known as the "Anti-terror law".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lokpal</span> Ombudsman agency of India

A Lokpal is an anti-corruption authority or body of ombudsman who represents the public interest in the Republic of India. The current Chairperson of Lokpal is Ajay Manikrao Khanwilkar. The Lokpal has jurisdiction over central government,anyone who is or has been Prime Minister, or a Minister in the Union government, or a Member of Parliament, as well as officials of the Union government under Groups A, B, C and D. Also covered are chairpersons, members, officers and directors of any board, corporation, society, trust or autonomous body either established by an Act of Parliament or wholly or partly funded by the Centre. It also covers any society or trust or body that receives foreign contributions above ₹10 lakh. to inquire into allegations of corruption against its public functionaries and for matters connected to corruption. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act was passed in 2013 with amendments in parliament, following the Jan Lokpal movement led by Anna Hazare in 2010. The Lokpal is responsible for enquiring into corruption charges at the national level while the Lokayukta performs the same function at the state level. The age of Lokpal on the date of assuming office as the chairperson or a member should not be less than 45 years.

Tiruchi Siva is a member of the Parliament of India representing Tamil Nadu in the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of parliament. He is from the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party, and was elected in 1996, 2002, 2007, 2014 and 2020. He is a speaker and a writer.

The Jan Lokpal Bill, also referred to as the Citizen's Ombudsman Bill, was a bill drawn up by civil society activists in India seeking the appointment of a Jan Lokpal, an independent body to investigate corruption cases and complete the investigation within a year for envisaging trial in the case getting completed within one year.

Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011 is an Act of the Parliament of India which provides a mechanism to investigate alleged corruption and misuse of power by public servants and also protect anyone who exposes alleged wrongdoing in government bodies, projects and offices. The wrongdoing might be in the form of fraud, corruption or mismanagement. The Act will also ensure punishment for false or frivolous complaints.

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, commonly known as The Lokpal Act, is an anti-corruption Act of Indian Parliament in India which "seeks to provide for the establishment of the institution of Lokpal to inquire into allegations of corruption against certain important public functionaries including the Prime Minister, cabinet ministers, members of parliament, Group A officials of the Central Government and for matters connecting them".

Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 has been passed by Parliament of India amidst intense controversy, debate, and protest on many of its provisions by Child Rights fraternity. It replaced the Indian juvenile delinquency law, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, and allows for juveniles in conflict with Law in the age group of 16–18, involved in Heinous Offences, to be tried as adults. The Act also sought to create a universally accessible adoption law for India, overtaking the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (1956) and the Guardians and Wards Act (1890), though not replacing them. The Act came into force from 15 January 2016.

The Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014 is a proposed Act of the Parliament of India which seeks to end the discrimination faced by transgender people in India. The Bill was passed by the upper house Rajya Sabha on 24 April 2015. It was introduced in the lower house Lok Sabha on 26 February 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gopi Shankar Madurai</span> Indian indigenist and politician

Gopi Shankar Madurai is an Indian equal rights and Indigenous rights activist. Shankar was one of the youngest, and the first openly intersex and genderqueer statutory authority and one of the candidates to contest in 2016 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election. Shankar is also the founder of Srishti Madurai Student Volunteer Collective. Shankar's work inspired the Madras High Court to direct the Government of Tamil Nadu to order a ban on forced sex-selective surgeries on intersex infants. In December 2017, Shankar was elected to the executive board of ILGA Asia. In August 2020, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment appointed Shankar as the South Regional representative in the National Council for Transgender Persons.Shankar introduced the "others" option in the sex column of application forms for political parties and central universities, including Jawaharlal Nehru University. Shankar was also instrumental in granting civil rights for transgender persons, including pilot licenses for transmen and property inheritance rights for transwomen. Additionally, the Juvenile Justice Committee and POCSO Committee seek Shankar’s advice on issues related to the infancy and childhood of infants and children born with diverse sex characteristics.

Kolkata Rainbow Pride Walk (KRPW) is the oldest pride walk in India and South Asia. The first march in Kolkata was organised on 2 July 1999. The walk was called The Friendship Walk. Kolkata was chosen as the first city in India to host the march owing to Kolkata's history of movements for human and Political Rights. Currently, Kolkata Rainbow Pride Walk is organised by the Kolkata Rainbow Pride Festival (KRPF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019</span> Indian law on triple talaq

The Muslim Women Act, 2019 is an Act of the Parliament of India criminalising triple talaq. In August 2017, the Supreme Court of India declared triple talaq, which enables Muslim men to instantly divorce their wives, to be unconstitutional. The minority opinion suggested the Parliament to consider appropriate legislation governing triple talaq in the Muslim community.

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Act, 2017, often shortened to the HIV/AIDS Prevention Act, is an act of the Parliament of India that provides for controlling and preventing of HIV/AIDS and securing the rights of individuals diagnosed with HIV/AIDS. The bill for the act was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 11 February 2014 and was referred to a Standing Committee on 24 February 2014, which submitted its report on 29 April 2015. After few amendments to the original 2014 bill, it was passed by the Rajya Sabh on 21 March 2017 and the Lok Sabha on 11 April 2017. It received Presidential assent on 20 April 2017, and became effective from 10 September 2018. The HIV/AIDS Prevention Act originated from a draft bill submitted by Lawyers Collective, a non-governmental organization, to the National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO) in 2006. The act penalises propagation of hate against HIV/AIDS affected persons, ensures the right of HIV/AIDS affected minors to shared household, protects non-disclosure of HIV/AIDS status in the absence of court order and mandates informed consent to disclose HIV/AIDS positive identity, inter alia. However, civil society organisations and HIV/AIDS affected persons criticised the act on certain legal language issues, as it mandates the state to provide HIV/AIDS affected persons with medical services "as far as possible". This aspect was absent from the draft bill submitted to NACO.

The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) was passed by the Parliament of India on 11 December 2019. It amended the Citizenship Act, 1955 by providing an accelerated pathway to Indian citizenship for persecuted religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who arrived in India by 2014. The eligible minorities were stated as Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis or Christians. The law does not grant such eligibility to Muslims from these countries. Additionally, the act excludes 58,000 Sri Lankan Tamil refugees, who have lived in India since the 1980s. The act was the first time that religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law, and it attracted global criticism.

References

  1. ↑ Vakoch, Douglas A., ed. (2022). Transgender India: Understanding Third Gender Identities and Experiences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96386-6. ISBN   978-3-030-96385-9. S2CID   213383859.
  2. ↑ Venkatesan, J. (15 April 2014). "Supreme Court recognises transgenders as third gender". The Hindu. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 14 June 2018. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  3. ↑ Kothari, Jayna (12 April 2018). "A promise falls short". The Hindu. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  4. ↑ Kothari, Jayna (15 September 2018). "The Supreme Court trans-formed". The Hindu. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  5. ↑ "National Legal Services Authority versus Union of India and others". Supreme Court Cases. 5: 438. 2014.
  6. ↑ "India court recognises transgender people as third gender". BBC. 15 April 2014. Archived from the original on 11 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  7. ↑ "Report of the Expert Committee on the Issues relating to Transgender Persons" (PDF) (Press release). Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. 21 January 2014. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  8. ↑ "Rights & wrongs — on Transgender Persons Bill". The Hindu. 9 December 2017. Archived from the original on 25 June 2018. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  9. ↑ Dhar, Aarti (24 March 2014). "Expert panel wants transgender declared third gender". The Hindu. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 24 December 2016. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  10. 1 2 Gandhi and, Ramachandran (24 April 2015). "RS passes Bill on transgender rights". The Hindu. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 10 May 2018. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  11. ↑ "The Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014" (PDF) (Press release). Rajya Sabha. 24 April 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 July 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  12. ↑ Srinivasan, Meera (25 April 2015). ""Turning point in transgender rights"". The Hindu. Chennai. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  13. ↑ "Activists oppose Bill on transgender rights". The Hindu. Bengaluru. 16 December 2015. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  14. ↑ Sinha, Chinki (16 August 2019). ""We can't erase our hijra culture"". India Today. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  15. ↑ "Rajya Sabha passes first private member's bill in 36 years, on transgenders' rights". Times of India. New Delhi. 25 April 2015. Archived from the original on 31 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  16. ↑ "Rajya Sabha passes transgenders rights bill, first private member proposal in 46 years". India Today. New Delhi. 24 April 2015. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  17. ↑ "Just 14 private member's bill passed by Parliament till date; the last was in 1970". Times of India. New Delhi. 25 April 2015. Archived from the original on 7 September 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  18. 1 2 Abraham, Rohan (30 November 2017). "All you need to know about the Transgender Persons Bill, 2016". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 7 May 2018. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  19. ↑ Ghildiyal, Subodh (30 December 2015). "Bill ensures family life for transgender children". Times of India. Archived from the original on 1 September 2019. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  20. 1 2 PTI (27 February 2016). "Lok Sabha Takes Up Bill To End Transgender Discrimination". New Delhi. NDTV. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  21. ↑ "Lok Sabha discusses transgender rights". The Hindu. 29 April 2016. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  22. ↑ Lalwani, Vijayta (24 December 2018). "How Parliament came to have two Bills on transgender persons' rights (and why neither may pass)". Scroll. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  23. ↑ "Rajya Sabha member wants to modify National Anthem". The Hindu. 21 June 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  24. ↑ "Explained: Why the Citizenship Amendment Bill is dead, for now". Indian Express. New Delhi. 13 February 2019. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  25. 1 2 Lalwani, Vijayta (19 December 2018). "'This is a black day': Activists criticise Transgender Persons Bill passed in Lok Sabha". Scroll. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 Jyoti, and Ratnam (19 December 2018). "Transgender bill criminalises community, say activists; seek its overhaul". Hindustan Times . New Delhi. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  27. ↑ "Lok Sabha passes Transgender bill". New Delhi. PRI. 17 December 2018. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  28. 1 2 3 Kondaiah, Karthik Bittu (15 June 2019). "The Transgender Persons Bill misses key demands of the community". Hindustan Times . Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  29. 1 2 3 Karangutkar, Suyash (28 December 2018). "Colleges join hands to protest against Transgender Bill 2018". The Hindu. Mumbai. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  30. ↑ "Rights, revised: on the Transgender Persons Bill, 2018". The Hindu. 20 December 2018. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  31. ↑ "Transgender rights Bill to be reintroduced". The Hindu . New Delhi. 5 June 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  32. ↑ Lalwani, Vijayta (24 December 2018). "How Parliament came to have two Bills on transgender persons' rights (and why neither may pass)". Scroll. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  33. 1 2 Sirohi, Nishant (24 July 2019). "Transgender Bill introduced in the Lok Sabha". The Leaflet. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  34. ↑ "Cabinet approves transgender bill". The Hindu Business Line. Press Trust of India. 10 July 2019. Archived from the original on 11 March 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  35. 1 2 PTI (5 August 2019). "Transgender Persons bill passed in Lok Sabha". The Hindu. New Delhi. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  36. ↑ "Congress opposition parties protest in Lok Sabha seek presence of Prime Minister on Kashmir decision". Times of India. New Delhi. 5 August 2019. Archived from the original on 8 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  37. ↑ "Parliament passes Bill to protect rights of transgenders". 26 November 2019. The Hindu. Archived from the original on 30 November 2019. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  38. 1 2 "Amid opposition from trans community, Rajya Sabha passes Transgender Persons Bill". The News Minute. 26 November 2019. Archived from the original on 14 April 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  39. ↑ "Rajya Sabha Passes Controversial Transgender Rights Bill". The Wire. 26 November 2019. Archived from the original on 28 November 2019. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  40. ↑ "The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 [No. 40 of 2019]" (PDF). socialjustice.nic.in. 5 December 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  41. 1 2 "Despite massive protests, Trans Bill gets President's assent, becomes law". The News Minute. 7 December 2019. Archived from the original on 4 March 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  42. ↑ "Notification, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment" (PDF). The Gazette of India . 10 January 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 January 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020. सी.जी.-डी.एल.-अ.-10012020-215301.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  43. ↑ Nath, Damini (11 January 2020). "Transgender Persons Act comes into effect". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  44. 1 2 3 Ravi, Sidharth (9 January 2019). "Trans activists up the ante, to challenge Bill". The Hindu. New Delhi. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  45. 1 2 Hasan, Ilma (17 December 2017). "LGBTQ community protests against Transgender Persons Bill". India Today. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  46. ↑ PRS India. "The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2016". PRS Legislative Research. Archived from the original on 19 August 2019. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  47. ↑ Banerjie, Ajita (21 December 2018). "Against the mandate for inclusion: the Transgender Persons Bill 2018". The Hindu. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  48. 1 2 "Transgender Bill: remove drawbacks". Deccan Herald. 24 December 2018. Archived from the original on 19 August 2019. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  49. 1 2 Sharma, Nidhi (20 July 2019). "Transgender Rights Bill introduced in Lok Sabha, may be taken up next week". Economic Times. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  50. 1 2 3 4 5 Venkatesan, V.; Kaur, Tanveer (10 January 2019). "Stiff opposition to transgender persons Bill". Frontline. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
  51. 1 2 Banerji, Annie (19 July 2019). "India introduces new trans rights bill in parliament after backlash". Reuters. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  52. ↑ Aggarwal, Aarushi (16 August 2019). "Govt. making rules for us without us: transgenders". The Hindu. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 15 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  53. 1 2 Quraishi, S. Y. (26 July 2019). "Bringing transgenders into mainstream". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  54. ↑ "The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill (No. 169), 2019" (PDF). PRS Legislative Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 August 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
  55. ↑ Gandhi, Dhruva; Ghia, Unnati (5 August 2019). "Transgender Rights Bill: A Stunted Understanding of Gender and Equality". The Wire . Archived from the original on 2 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  56. ↑ Karpagam, Sylvia (30 December 2018). "Why Transgender Persons Bill 2018 is a healthcare nightmare for the community". The News Minute. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  57. ↑ Kumar, Prakash (5 August 2019). "Bill to protect rights of transgenders passed in LS". Deccan Herald. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  58. ↑ Kothari, Jayna (29 December 2018). "A law that defeats its purpose". The Hindu. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  59. ↑ ANI (5 August 2019). "Lok Sabha passes bill to prohibit discrimination against transgenders". DNA. Archived from the original on 6 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  60. ↑ Singh, Prashant; Shankar, Gopi (5 May 2020). "Modi govt releasing draft rules on Transgender Persons Act in lockdown a blow to community". The Print. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  61. ↑ Bhatia, Gautam (5 January 2019). "The Rajya Sabha must amend the Transgender Persons Bill". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  62. ↑ "Transgender rights should not depend on a screening". Hindustan Times. 19 February 2018. Archived from the original on 19 August 2019. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  63. ↑ "Over 1,000 transgenders from Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu protest against new law". New Indian Express. 22 December 2018. Archived from the original on 19 August 2019. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  64. ↑ Gowda, Varsha (8 August 2019). "Transgender Persons Bill evokes mixed responses". The New Indian Express. Bengaluru. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  65. ↑ Karangutkar, Suyash (27 December 2018). "Bill will deprive us of right to live with dignity, say transgender activists". The Hindu. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
  66. ↑ "Transgender Persons Bill: Opposition MPs in Rajya Sabha promise not to pass draft law". Scroll. 28 December 2018. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  67. 1 2 "'Withdraw Transgenders Bill, table it again with changes'". The Hindu. 1 January 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
  68. ↑ Dharmadhikari, Sanyukta (5 August 2019). "Trans Bill 2019 passed in Lok Sabha: Why the trans community in India is rejecting it". The News Minute. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  69. 1 2 Rosario, Kennith (8 April 2019). "The invisible 'third gender' voters". The Hindu. Mumbai. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  70. ↑ SNS Web (2 April 2019). "Congress manifesto promises 34 lakh jobs, farmer welfare, says will scrap NITI Aayog". The Statesman. New Delhi. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  71. 1 2 Pandit, Ambika (5 April 2019). "Transgender activist meets Ram Madhav, seeks revised bill if BJP is returned to power". Times of India. Archived from the original on 20 September 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  72. ↑ Sharma, Raghavi (17 July 2019). "Trans Activists Demand Release of Full Text of Cabinet-Approved Transgender Bill". The Wire. Archived from the original on 17 August 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  73. ↑ Iyer, Swathy R (25 November 2019). "Namma Pride March: Rainbow spread cheer, but with a dash of black". Times of India. Archived from the original on 29 November 2019. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  74. ↑ Banerjee, Rohini (25 November 2019). "Delhi marched against Trans Bill 2019 on Pride Day". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 23 January 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  75. 1 2 3 Pathak, Sushmita (4 December 2019). "India Just Passed A Trans Rights Bill. Why Are Trans Activists Protesting It?". National Public Radio. Archived from the original on 3 March 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  76. ↑ Masih, Niha (30 November 2019). "A bill meant to protect India's transgender community instead leaves them angry and aggrieved". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2 March 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  77. ↑ "Protests held in Dadar against Transgender Persons Bill 2019". Mumbai Mirror. 1 December 2019. Archived from the original on 1 December 2019. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  78. ↑ Khan, Fatima (27 November 2019). "'Murder of gender justice' — activists urge President Kovind not to sign transgender bill". The Print. Archived from the original on 1 December 2019. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  79. ↑ "Take back Trans Act: Mumbai Trans community". Outlook India. IANS. 5 February 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  80. ↑ Manral, Avnisha (25 February 2020). "Mumbai Pride 2020: Thousands stand in solidarity with queer Muslims amid CAA-NRC chaos, urge govt to amend 'draconian' Transgender Act". Firstpost. Archived from the original on 15 March 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  81. ↑ Sharma, Neetu Chandra (26 November 2019). "Rajya Sabha passes Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019". Live Mint. Archived from the original on 28 November 2019. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  82. ↑ "India: Transgender Bill Raises Rights Concerns". New York: Human Rights Watch. 23 July 2019. Archived from the original on 30 July 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  83. ↑ "After West Bengal and Maharashtra, Assam gets its first transgender judge". Scroll . 13 July 2018. Retrieved 4 July 2020.
  84. ↑ "Supreme Court notice to Centre on plea against transgender act". Hindustan Times. 28 January 2020. Archived from the original on 29 January 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  85. ↑ Tripathi, Ashish (27 January 2020). "Supreme Court notice to Centre on plea against Transgender Act, 2019". Deccan Herald. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  86. ↑ Mahajan, Shruti (13 June 2020). "Transgender Persons Act, 2019 violates the fundamental rights it seeks to protect: Another challenge mounted in Supreme Court". Bar and Bench. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  87. ↑ Chacko, Jelsyna (12 February 2022). "Towards a gender-inclusive future: Judicial developments recognising rights of the transgender community in India". Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news. Retrieved 17 March 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.