Battle of Carberry Hill

Last updated

Battle of Carberry Hill
Part of the Marian civil war
Mary Q Scots 1567.JPG
Commemorative Stane at Carberry marking the site of the conflict
Date15 June 1567
Location
Carberry Hill, near Musselburgh, East Lothian, Scotland
Result Victory for opponents of Mary, Queen of Scots
Belligerents
Forces loyal to Mary, Queen of Scots Forces opposed to Mary, Queen of Scots
Commanders and leaders
Earl of Bothwell Kirkcaldy of Grange
Strength
2,000, including
200 musketeers
300 pikemen
2,000
Casualties and losses
Unknown Unknown

The Battle of Carberry Hill took place on 15 June 1567, near Musselburgh, East Lothian, a few miles east of Edinburgh, Scotland. A number of Scottish lords objected to the rule of Mary, Queen of Scots, after she had married the Earl of Bothwell, who was widely believed to have murdered her previous husband Lord Darnley. The Lords were intent to avenge Darnley's death. However, Bothwell escaped from the stand-off at Carberry while Queen Mary surrendered. Mary abdicated, escaped from prison, and was defeated at the battle of Langside. She went to exile in England while her supporters continued a civil war in Scotland.

Contents

Conflict

In May 1567 Queen Mary of Scotland married James Hepburn, 4th Earl of Bothwell. Many of the Queen's allies who previously supported her, including Maitland, Morton, Balfour, and Murray of Tullibardine, disapproved of this and chose to oppose her. Many of the same Lords who claimed disapproval in June had signed the Ainslie Tavern Bond only two months earlier in April, pledging support for the marriage.

In April, Bothwell, along with several others, had been accused of Lord Darnley's murder. Bothwell was acquitted of the charge. His chief prosecutor, Lord Darnley's father, the Earl of Lennox, failed to appear at the trial despite multiple summons. His 3,000 troops were turned back when confronted by Bothwell's 4,000, and then Lennox chose not to appear. Scottish law of the time prohibited an accuser from bringing armed troops to a trial. Many Scottish nobles disputed the trial verdict, and James Murray, brother of the Laird of Tullibardine, offered to duel with Bothwell or prove the guilt of Darnley's murder on Bothwell's henchmen. [1] Despite this very public dissent, Mary made Bothwell the Duke of Orkney and Marquis of Fife on 12 May 1567, then married him three days later. On 11 June 1567 Bothwell's enemies assembled in armour in Edinburgh, with a printed proclamation of their intention to deliver the Queen, revenge Darnley's murder, and preserve the Prince. [2]

Stand-off at Carberry Hill

With only the support of the Hamiltons, Queen Mary and Bothwell left Fa'side Castle on the morning of 15 June 1567 and took position on the nearby field of battle at Carberry Hill against her enemies, the rebel Confederate Lords. Mary's army, according to John Knox, took their position at Carberry Hill in an entrenchment made by the English for the Battle of Pinkie twenty years before. They were armed with cannon and pole-arms brought from Dunbar Castle. According to a letter sent to the Archbishop of Glasgow, the Queen had 200 "hagbutters" commanded by Captains Alexander Stewart and Hew Lauder of her royal guard. Seven or eight cannon were brought from Dunbar Castle to defend the Queen's position at the "auld fort" by Fawside Castle. [3] Bothwell's men had also brought 300 pikes from the armoury at Dunbar. After the surrender these weapons were captured and dispersed, and in September 1567 the Scottish Privy Council wrote to the villages around Carberry asking for their return. [4]

The Confederate Lords approached from Musselburgh with an army of equal force. David Calderwood wrote they were 2,000 but with only a few "harquebusiers" who were volunteers from Edinburgh. [5] Knox, with local knowledge, wrote that they rounded the hill to get an easier ascent and make an approach from Carberry village without the sun in their eyes. At first during this manoeuvre Mary's army thought the Confederate Lords were bypassing them and fleeing to Dalkeith. The stand-off lasted from 11 o'clock in the morning till 5 o'clock in the afternoon. With the armies marshalled against each other, the French ambassador tried to negotiate, and received from the Earl of Morton his firm resolution to fight against the murderer of Lord Darnley. [6] Bothwell's first action was to fire his cannon at cavalry 'prickers' who tried to draw the Queen's party out to fight. [7]

Queen Mary's supporters carried the banner of the Lion of Scotland; the rebel Lords' banner depicted the murder scene showing Darnley dead under a tree with the infant James VI, with the motto, "Judge and Revenge my cause, O Lord". [8] [9] This banner had been flown as a flag at Edinburgh castle. [10]

Bothwell offered single combat to any of the Confederate Lords. William Kirkcaldy accepted the challenge, [11] but Bothwell would not fight him as he was merely a baron. He also refused Murray of Tullibardine, and then Lord Lindsay. It was hot and Queen Mary's supporters had nothing to drink. [12] The day dragged on. Two of Bothwell's supporters, Edmund Blackadder [13] and the laird of Wedderburn, understanding that Bothwell was intending to leave, made their apologies to the Queen and rode away. [14] In response to an oath made by the rebel Lords, Queen Mary agreed to surrender to Kirkcaldy. He led her horse by the bridle down from the hill, [15] while Bothwell rode off to Dunbar Castle with 25 horsemen. A drawing of the battlefield sent to London with a newsletter survives and gives a schematic idea of the events. [16]

When William Drury, Marshall of Berwick sent a drawing of the Confederate Lord's banner and the plan to London, he added this postscript:

"The Queen's apparel in the field was after the fashion of the women of Edinburgh, in a red petticoat, sleeves tied with points a "partlyte," a velvet hat and muffler. She used great persuasions and encouragements to her people to have tried it by battle. For welcome the Lords showed her the banner with the dead body, which seeing they say that she wished she had never seen him. The banner was hanged out before her window at the Provost's house (in Edinburgh), wherewith she seemed much offended. [17]

George Buchanan wrote that Mary surrendered "dressed only in a short shabby robe, that scarcely reached below her knee." [18] Mary had left her more elaborate outfit in a chest at Fawside Castle: a black dress sewn with grains of jet, a crimson coat and cloak, and her gold and silver embroidered hat. [19]

Queen and King's men

According to the later chronicle called The Historie of James the Sext, Queen Mary's supporters at Carberry were George Seton, 7th Lord Seton, Lord Hay of Yester, Lord Borthwick, John Cockburn of Ormiston, Home of Wedderburn, Blackadder of Tulliallan, and Cockburn of Langtoun.

The Confederate Lords included the Regent Morton, John Erskine, Earl of Mar, Alexander Cunningham, 5th Earl of Glencairn, the Lords Lindsay, William Ruthven, 1st Earl of Gowrie, Alexander Home, 5th Lord Home, Lord Sempill, Lord Sanquhar, and the lairds William Murray of Tullibardine, Douglas of Drumlanrig, Kirkcaldy of Grange and all their horsemen and foot soldiers. [20]

Aftermath

The rebel Lords took Queen Mary to Edinburgh. Some chronicles say she was first held in the lodging of Simon Preston of Craigmillar. [21] Betraying their oath at Carberry Hill, the Lords imprisoned her in Lochleven Castle, near Kinross, where her keeper was Sir William Douglas, half brother to James Stewart, 1st Earl of Moray. William Kirkcaldy was infuriated at the rebel Lords' betrayal of the oath, which he had represented to her in good faith. According to George Buchanan the spy Ninian Cockburn raced to the French court with news of Mary's capture. On the way he overtook her ambassador, William Chisholm, Bishop of Dunblane, who was ignorant of Mary's defeat, and upstaged him in front of Charles IX of France and Catherine de Medici. [22]

Queen Mary remained in prison for eleven months while accusations continued by the Lords who deposed her at Carberry Hill. Bothwell obtained a ship and first went to Shetland, where he was helped by Olave Sinclair. [23] He evaded Murray of Tullibardine and William Kirkcaldy whose ship the Lion ran aground. Then he crossed the sea to Norway, captivity, and madness. [24]

Mary escaped from Lochleven and made for Dumbarton Castle in the west of Scotland. She was drawn into battle at Langside and defeated. Mary sought safety in England, became a closely watched captive, and was executed in 1587. In Scotland, her supporters continued a civil war for the next five years.

Footnotes

  1. Joseph Bain, Calendar State Papers Scotland, vol. 2 (Edinburgh, 1900), p.328.
  2. Calendar State Papers Scotland, vol. 2 (Edinburgh, 1900), p. 331.
  3. Laing, Malcolm, History of Scotland with a Preliminary Dissertation on the Participation of Mary, Queen of Scots, in the Murder of Darnley, vol. 2 (1819), pp.109-118, see p.114-5
  4. Register Privy Council of Scotland, 1545-1569, vol. 1 (Edinburgh, 1877), p. 575.
  5. Thomson, Thomas, ed., Historie of the Kirk of Scotland by David Calderwood, vol. 2 (Edinburgh, 1843), p. 363
  6. Laing, David, ed., Works of John Knox: History of the Reformation, vol.2, Wodrow Society (1846), pp. 559-560, Knox made the same remark about the sun in reference to the nearby Battle of Pinkie (1547).
  7. Malcolm Laing, History of Scotland with a Preliminary Dissertation on the Participation of Mary, Queen of Scots, in the Murder of Darnley, vol. 2 (1819), pp. 109-118.
  8. Duncan Macmillan, Scottish Art, 1460–1990 (Mainstream, 1990), p. 47.
  9. Michael Questier, Dynastic Politics and the British Reformations, 1558-1630 (Oxford, 2019), p. 62: A. Labanoff, Lettres de Marie Stuart, vol. 7 (London, 1852), 212, M. Du Croc to Charles IX, 17 June 1567.
  10. Calendar State Papers Spain (Simancas), vol. 1 (London, 1871), no. 427.
  11. Register of the Privy Seal of Seal of Scotland, vol. 8 (Edinburgh, 1982), no. 397, 15 July 1581, narration relates Kirkcaldy would also have accepted any challenge offered on behalf of Bothwell.
  12. Thomson, Thomas, ed., The Historie of James the Sext (Banntyne Club, 1825), 12
  13. A real person, scion of the historic Clan Blackadder.
  14. Calendar State Papers Scotland, vol. 2 (Edinburgh, 1900), p. 333 (index p. 742 gives "Edmund.")
  15. Gordon Donaldson, The Memoirs of Sir James Melville of Halhill (Folio Society, London, 1969), pp. 68-69.
  16. See External links; UK National Archives PRO Kew SP52/13 MPF1/366; with a drawing of the banner at the same location.
  17. Calendar of State Papers Foreign, Elizabeth: 1566-1568, vol. 8 (London, 1871), no. 1313.
  18. Aikman, James, trans., History of Scotland by George Buchanan, vol. 2 (Glasgow, 1827), p. 522, Latin: "tunicula tantum vestita, eaque vili et detrita, ac paulum infra genua demissa" (possibly like a kilt).
  19. Annie Cameron, Warrender Papers, vol. 1 (Edinburgh: SHS, 1931), p. 50.
  20. Thomson, Thomas, ed.,The Historie of James the Sext (Edinburgh, 1825), p. 14.
  21. John Graham Dalyell, Annals of Scotland: From the Yeir 1514 to the Yeir 1591, by George Marioreybanks (Edinburgh, 1814), p. 19.
  22. Aikman, James, trans., History of Scotland by George Buchanan, vol. 2 (Glasgow, 1827), p. 523
  23. Diurnal of Occurrents (Edinburgh, 1833), p. 123
  24. John H. Ballantyne & Brian Smith, Shetland Documents, 1195-1579 (Lerwick, 1999), pp. 126-8 no. 171.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley</span> King consort of Scotland from 1565 to 1567

Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley was King of Scotland as the second husband of Mary, Queen of Scots, from 29 July 1565 until his murder in 1567. Lord Darnley had one child with Mary, the future James VI of Scotland and I of England. Through his parents, he had claims to both the Scottish and English thrones. Less than a year after the birth of his son, Darnley was murdered at Kirk o' Field in 1567. Many contemporary narratives describing his life and death refer to him as simply Lord Darnley, his title as heir apparent to the Earldom of Lennox.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Hepburn, 4th Earl of Bothwell</span> Scottish nobleman

James Hepburn, 1st Duke of Orkney and 4th Earl of Bothwell, better known simply as Lord Bothwell, was a prominent Scottish nobleman. He was known for his marriage to Mary, Queen of Scots, as her third and final husband. He was accused of the murder of Mary's second husband, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, a charge of which he was acquitted. His marriage to Mary was controversial and divided the country; when he fled the growing rebellion to Norway, he was arrested and lived the rest of his life imprisoned in Denmark.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Stewart, 1st Earl of Moray</span> Regent for King James VI of Scotland from 1567–1570

James Stewart, 1st Earl of Moray was a member of the House of Stewart as the illegitimate son of King James V of Scotland. At times a supporter of his half-sister Mary, Queen of Scots, he was the regent of Scotland for his half-nephew, the infant King James VI, from 1567 until his assassination in 1570. He was the first head of government to be assassinated with a firearm.

John Stewart, 4th Earl of Atholl, called the Fair, was a Scottish nobleman and courtier. He was favoured by Mary, Queen of Scots, but later turned against her.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Erskine, Earl of Mar (died 1572)</span> Scottish noble (died 1572)

John Erskine, 1st Earl of Mar was a Scottish aristocrat and politician. He was the custodian of the infant James VI of Scotland and Regent of Scotland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Maitland of Lethington</span> Scottish politician (1525–1573)

William Maitland of Lethington was a Scottish politician and reformer, and the eldest son of poet Richard Maitland.

George Gordon, 5th Earl of Huntly, was Lord Chancellor of Scotland and major conspirator of his time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Casket letters</span> Supposed writings by Mary, Queen of Scots

The Casket letters were eight letters and some sonnets said to have been written by Mary, Queen of Scots, to the Earl of Bothwell, between January and April 1567. They were produced as evidence against Queen Mary by the Scottish lords who opposed her rule. In particular, the text of the letters was taken to imply that Queen Mary colluded with Bothwell in the murder of her husband, Lord Darnley. Mary's contemporary supporters, including Adam Blackwood, dismissed them as complete forgeries or letters written by the Queen's servant Mary Beaton. The authenticity of the letters, now known only by copies, continues to be debated. Some historians argue that they were forgeries concocted in order to discredit Queen Mary and ensure that Queen Elizabeth I supported the kingship of the infant James VI of Scotland, rather than his mother. The historian John Hungerford Pollen, in 1901, by comparing two genuine letters drafted by Mary, presented a subtle argument that the various surviving copies and translations of the casket letters could not be used as evidence of their original authorship by Mary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Kirkcaldy of Grange</span> 16th-century Scottish politician and soldier

Sir William Kirkcaldy of Grange was a Scottish politician and soldier who fought for the Scottish Reformation. He ended his career holding Edinburgh castle on behalf of Mary, Queen of Scots and was hanged at the conclusion of a long siege.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Act Anent the demission of the Crown in favour of our Sovereign Lord, and his Majesty's Coronation 1567</span> Act passed by Parliament of Scotland

The Act Anent the demission of the Crown in favour of our Sovereign Lord, and his Majesty's Coronation was an Act of the Parliament of Scotland passed on 12 December 1567. It confirmed the dethronement of Mary, Queen of Scots, in favour of her son, James VI.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder of Lord Darnley</span> 1567 murder in Edinburgh, Scotland

The murder of Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, second husband of Mary, Queen of Scots, took place on 10 February 1567 in Edinburgh, Scotland. Darnley's lodgings were destroyed by gunpowder; his body and that of his servant were found nearby, apparently having been strangled rather than killed in the explosion. Suspicion was placed upon Queen Mary and the Earl of Bothwell, whom Mary went on to marry three months after Darnley's murder. Bothwell was indicted for treason and acquitted, but six of his servants and acquaintances were subsequently arrested, tried, and executed for the crime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ainslie Tavern Bond</span> 16th-century document

The Ainslie Tavern Bond was a document signed on about 20 April 1567 by a number of Scottish bishops and nobles. The bond approved the Earl of Bothwell's acquittal on 12 April of implication in the murder of Lord Darnley, recommended him as an appropriate husband for Mary, Queen of Scots, and pledged to assist in defending such a marriage.

Patrick Lindsay, 6th Lord Lindsay of the Byres, (1521–1589), Scottish courtier and Confederate lord.

Robert Melville, 1st Lord Melville was a Scottish diplomat, administrator, jurist, and intriguer, and uncle of the poet Elizabeth Melville.

Margaret Beaton, Lady Reres was a Scottish courtier and companion of Mary of Guise and Mary, Queen of Scots. She was blamed by the enemies of Mary, Queen of Scots, for her involvement in alleged immorality at court.

William Murray of Tullibardine was a Scottish courtier and leader of the Clan Murray.

Sir John Wishart of Pitarrow was a Scottish lawyer, courtier, comptroller of the exchequer, and rebel.

William Murray of Tullibardine (1510–1562) was a Scottish landowner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coronation of James VI</span>

James Stewart (1566–1625), son of Mary, Queen of Scots (1542–1587) and Lord Darnley (1546–1567), was crowned King of Scotland by Adam Bothwell, Bishop of Orkney, in the Holy Rude Kirk at Stirling on 29 July 1567.

The Book of Articles is a list of allegations against Mary, Queen of Scots and James Hepburn, 4th Earl of Bothwell. The document was produced for the Westminster Conference in December 1568. The manuscript, held by the British Library, was written by Alexander Hay of Easter Kennett, and is sometimes known as Hay's Articles. The material resembles George Buchanan's published Detection and his Indictment of Mary. The text was published by John Hosack in 1869.