Collaborative law

Last updated

Collaborative law, also known as collaborative practice, divorce, or family law, [1] is a legal process through which couples who have decided to separate or end their marriage work together with a team of collaboratively trained professionals including lawyers, divorce coaches, and financial professionals to achieve a settlement that meets the needs of both parties and their children without the need for litigation. The process allows parties to obtain a fair settlement while minimizing the time, cost, uncertainty, and acrimony that can accompany a litigious divorce or separation. Couples initiate this voluntary process by signing a contract (a "participation agreement") binding each other to the process and disqualifying their respective lawyer's right to represent either one in any future family-related litigation.[ citation needed ]

Contents

The collaborative law process can also facilitate a broad range of other family issues including disputes between parents and the drafting of pre- and post-marital (or prenuptial and postnuptial) contracts. Given the oppositional nature of the traditional method of creating pre-marital contracts, many couples prefer to begin their married life with documents drawn up consensually and mutually. [2]

Collaborative law processes have the added benefit of being cost-efficient for the involved parties. Assigning all the necessary tasks to specialized professionals without duplicating effort reduces costs for the parties. [3] These cost efficiencies, in addition to other potential benefits, have led parties in other contexts to explore the use of collaborative law to resolve disputes, including M&A transactions. [4]

History

This approach to conflict resolution was created in 1990 by Minnesota family lawyer Stuart Webb, who saw that traditional litigation was not always helpful to parties and their families, and often was damaging. Since 1990, the Collaborative Law movement has spread rapidly to most of the United States, Europe, Canada and Australia. Per the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals ("IACP"), more than 22,000 lawyers have been trained in Collaborative Law worldwide, with collaborative practitioners in at least 46 states. In some localities, Collaborative Law has become the predominant method for resolving divorce, cohabitation, and other family disputes. More than 1,250 lawyers have completed their training in England where collaborative law was launched in 2003.

The Collaborative Law movement has spread rapidly to most of the United States, [5] Europe, Canada [6] [7] and Australia., [8] More than 22,000 lawyers have been trained in Collaborative Law worldwide and more than 1,250 lawyers have completed their training in England and Wales where Collaborative Law was launched in 2003.

In Canada, interest in a collaborative legal approach has been growing since 2005, when several hundred family law attorneys were already practicing collaborative law. Lawyers had recognized the need for experts in fields outside of law such as mental health, lifestyle counseling, and financial planning, sourcing these backgrounds to provide better service to clients. Since financial matters drive much of divorce negotiations, collaborative law has driven demand for chartered financial divorce specialists with training in tax law, asset valuation, estate & property division, spousal support, pensions & retirement funds, etc. to fill the gap for lawyers in understanding long-term financial impacts outside of legal expertise. [9]

The growth of the collaborative process in England and Wales has been encouraged by both the judiciary and the family lawyers organization, Resolution. [10] In an address to London family lawyers in October 2009, the newly appointed Supreme Court Justice, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore became the first member of the Supreme Court to publicly endorse Collaborative Law and called for its extension to other areas. [11] [12] Previously, in October 2008 the Hon. Mr Justice Coleridge, a High Court Judge of the Family Division, had promised that collaborative agreements would be fast tracked in the High Court of England and Wales. [13] On 29 November 2011, speaking at a reception hosted by the group, Collaborative Family Law, [14] Supreme Court Justice Lord Wilson of Culworth reaffirmed his commitment to Collaborative Law and other Family Dispute Resolution Services whilst criticizing the Government's plans to cut legal aid, which he called a "false economy". [15]

Organizations

The primary global collaborative organization is the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals (IACP), which was founded in the late 1990s by a group of northern California lawyers, psychotherapists, and financial planners. IACP has more than 2,400 members and there are more than 200 practice groups of collaborative practitioners worldwide. The IACP offers an opportunity for education and networking for its members [16] as well as provides a resource for research on collaborative divorce. [17]

The American Bar Association ("ABA"), the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, and the International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers ("IAML") [18] all have Collaborative Law committees.

IACP is an interdisciplinary organization whose members include lawyers, mental health professionals, finance and financial divorce specialists. National Collaborative organizations have been established in many jurisdictions around the world, including Australia, [19] Austria, [20] [21] Canada, [22] the Czech Republic, England, France, Germany, Israel, Hong Kong, Kenya, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, [23] the Republic of Ireland, [24] Scotland, [25] Switzerland, and Uganda, as well as the United States. There is an active on-line collaborative community on Be-fulfilled.org.

In England and Wales, Resolution, has assumed responsibility for the training and accreditation of all collaborative professionals. [26] Almost one-third of all English family lawyers have now completed their collaborative training. In the Republic of Ireland regional collaborative law associations have been set up in cities such as Galway, [27] Cork, [28] and Dublin. In France the AFPDC was created in 2009 to develop and implement collaborative practice in France. [29]

A number of states in the United States have their own individual organizations for collaborative law practitioners, including Collaborative Practice California, [30] the Collaborative Family Law Council of Florida, [31] Collaborative Law Institute of Georgia, the Collaborative Law Institute of Illinois, the Collaborative Law Institute of Minnesota, the Collaborative Law Institute of North Carolina, Collaborative Divorce Texas [32] [33] and the Massachusetts Collaborative Law Council, and the Washington DC Academy of Collaborative Professionals.

Further, most metropolitan areas, such as San Diego, [34] Los Angeles, [35] Tampa, [36] Dallas, [37] Raleigh, [38] Cleveland, [39] St. Louis [40] and Chicago [41] have local collaborative practice groups.

Uniform Collaborative Law Act

In the United States, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act was adopted in 2009 by the Uniform Law Commission, and thereby became available to the individual States to enact as law. In 2010, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act was amended to add several options and renamed the Uniform Collaborative Law Rules and Act. As of June 2013, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act was enacted into law in the states of Utah, Nevada, Texas, Hawaii, Ohio, the District of Columbia, and Washington State, and passed by the Alabama Legislature but awaiting the Governor's signature, and was pending enactment in several additional U.S. states. [42] In Texas, Houston-based family lawyer Harry Tindall has been instrumental in securing passage of the UCLA by the Texas Legislature. [43] On 24 March 2016, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed the Collaborative Law Process Act, Florida's version of the Uniform Collaborative Law Act, which creates a statutory privilege that makes confidential communications had during the collaborative process. [44]

The Overview to the Act provides a comprehensive and reliable history of the emergence of collaborative law in the United States. [45]

In some states, like Florida, which were waiting on the passage of the Uniform Collaborative Law Act, local judges had been teaming up with collaborative professionals and creating local rules and administrative orders endorsing and regulating collaborative law. [46]

Related Research Articles

Dispute resolution or dispute settlement is the process of resolving disputes between parties. The term dispute resolution is conflict resolution through legal means.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mediation</span> Dispute resolution with assistance of a moderator

Mediation is a negotiation facilitated by a third-party neutral. It is a structured, interactive process where an impartial third party, the mediator, assists disputing parties in resolving conflict through the use of specialized communication and negotiation techniques. All participants in mediation are encouraged to actively participate in the process. Mediation is a "party-centered" process in that it is focused primarily upon the needs, rights, and interests of the parties. The mediator uses a wide variety of techniques to guide the process in a constructive direction and to help the parties find their optimal solution. A mediator is facilitative in that they manage the interaction between parties and facilitates open communication. Mediation is also evaluative in that the mediator analyzes issues and relevant norms ("reality-testing"), while refraining from providing prescriptive advice to the parties.

Divorce is the process of terminating a marriage or marital union. Divorce usually entails the canceling or reorganising of the legal duties and responsibilities of marriage, thus dissolving the bonds of matrimony between a married couple under the rule of law of the particular country or state. It can be said to be a legal dissolution of a marriage by a court or other competent body. It is the legal process of ending a marriage.

A prenuptial agreement, antenuptial agreement, or premarital agreement, is a written contract entered into by a couple before marriage or a civil union that enables them to select and control many of the legal rights they acquire upon marrying, and what happens when their marriage ends by death or divorce. Couples enter into a written prenuptial agreement to supersede many of the default marital laws that would otherwise apply in the event of divorce, such as the laws that govern the division of property, retirement benefits, savings, and the right to seek alimony with agreed-upon terms that provide certainty and clarify their marital rights. A premarital agreement may also contain waivers of a surviving spouse's right to claim an elective share of the estate of the deceased spouse.

A contingent fee is any fee for services provided where the fee is payable only if there is a favourable result. Although such a fee may be used in many fields, it is particularly well associated with legal practice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kenneth Feinberg</span> American lawyer

Kenneth Roy Feinberg is an American attorney specializing in mediation and alternative dispute resolution. He served as the Chief of Staff to Senator Ted Kennedy, Special Master of the U.S. government's September 11th Victim Compensation Fund and the Special Master for TARP Executive Compensation. Additionally, Feinberg served as the government-appointed administrator of the BP Deepwater Horizon Disaster Victim Compensation Fund. Feinberg was also appointed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to administer the One Fund—the victim assistance fund established in the wake of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings. Feinberg was also retained by General Motors to assist in their recall response and by Volkswagen to oversee their U.S. compensation of VW diesel owners affected by the Volkswagen emissions scandal. Feinberg was hired by The Boeing Company in July 2019, to oversee distribution of $50 million to support 737 MAX crash victim families. Feinberg is also an adjunct professor at the Columbia University School of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Georgetown University Law Center, New York University School of Law, the University of Virginia School of Law and at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.

No-fault divorce is the dissolution of a marriage that does not require a showing of wrongdoing by either party. Laws providing for no-fault divorce allow a family court to grant a divorce in response to a petition by either party of the marriage without requiring the petitioner to provide evidence that the defendant has committed a breach of the marital contract.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State Bar of Texas</span> Bar Association

The State Bar of Texas is an agency of the judiciary under the administrative control of the Texas Supreme Court. It is responsible for assisting the Texas Supreme Court in overseeing all attorneys licensed to practice law in Texas. With more than 100,000 active members, the State Bar of Texas is one of the largest state bars in the United States. Unlike the American Bar Association (ABA), the State Bar of Texas (SBOT) is a mandatory bar. The State Bar is headquartered in the Texas Law Center at 1414 Colorado Street in Austin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nathan Lewin</span> American attorney (born 1936)

Nathan Lewin is an American attorney who has argued many cases before the Supreme Court of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divorce law by country</span>

Divorce law, the legal provisions for the dissolution of marriage, varies widely across the globe, reflecting diverse legal systems and cultural norms. Most nations allow for residents to divorce under some conditions except the Philippines and the Vatican City, an ecclesiastical sovereign city-state, which has no procedure for divorce. In these two countries, laws only allow annulment of marriages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Stewart (solicitor)</span>

James Stewart is a London-based family lawyer and Chambers HNW Family Lawyer of the Year.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is a private American corporation that acts as a self-regulatory organization (SRO) that regulates member brokerage firms and exchange markets. FINRA is the successor to the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) as well as to the member regulation, enforcement, and arbitration operations of the New York Stock Exchange. The U.S. government agency that acts as the ultimate regulator of the U.S. securities industry, including FINRA, is the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Diana L. Mercer works in the field of divorce mediation and is the founder of Peace Talks Mediation Services in Los Angeles, California. Mercer is also the co-author of Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce..

In the United States, marriage and divorce fall under the jurisdiction of state governments, not the federal government.

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR), or external dispute resolution (EDR), typically denotes a wide range of dispute resolution processes and techniques that parties can use to settle disputes with the help of a third party. They are used for disagreeing parties who cannot come to an agreement short of litigation. However, ADR is also increasingly being adopted as a tool to help settle disputes within the court system.

Unbundled legal services, also known as limited scope representation and discrete task representation, is a method of legal representation in which an attorney and client agree to limit the scope of the attorney’s involvement in a lawsuit or other legal action, leaving responsibility for those other aspects of the case to the client in order to save the client money and give them more control. Unbundled legal services, limited scope retainers or discrete task representation are available in multiple jurisdictions, including the United States, as well as the Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Ontario. One common use of unbundled legal services is family law, as a case is often too complex for a pro se litigant to handle alone but the cost of full-service legal representation is often prohibitive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Tindall</span> American lawyer

Harry Lee Tindall is a founding shareholder of Tindall & England, P.C. in Houston, Texas. The firm is ranked as a top tier firm by both Martindale Hubbell and U.S. News & World Report.

The Collaborative Law Institute of Texas (CLI-TX) is a non-profit organization, founded in 2003 and headquartered in Dallas, to promote collaborative law as an alternative to traditional litigation in solving divorce disputes. The organization's membership includes lawyers, financial professionals, and mental health professionals who practice collaborative law and/or serve on collaborative law teams.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forrest S. Mosten</span> American lawyer

Forrest "Woody" Steven Mosten is an American lawyer and author. Mosten has been practicing law in Los Angeles since 1972, additionally serves clients in San Diego and Orange County, and accepts mediation engagement throughout the world online. A former litigator, he is a full-time peacemaker and never takes a case to court, often working in an interdisciplinary team with a triage approach. Mosten has spoken at conferences and trains lawyers and litigators, and he is an adjunct professor at the UCLA School of Law, where he has been teaching since 2002.

Amanda Kim Banton is an Australian lawyer who specialises in corporate litigation, particularly matters involving complex financial instruments and insolvency based disputes. Until March 2020 she was a partner in the Sydney office of global business law firm Squire Patton Boggs. Banton is the currently the Managing Partner of Banton Group, a firm she established in 2020. Banton Group specializes in large commercial dispute resolution, class actions, restructuring and insolvency litigation and advisory matters.

References

  1. ↑ See "History" in this article, and Footnote 4.
  2. ↑ "Law Society Gazette Collaborative Pre-Nups". Lawgazette.co.uk. Archived from the original on 4 March 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  3. ↑ "The Efficiency of the Collaborative Divorce Settlement Process". Axelrod Collaborative Law. 24 March 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  4. ↑ Fabian, Christian. "Is Collaborative Law an Option for Resolving M&A Disputes". Transaction Advisors. ISSN   2329-9134. Archived from the original on 23 July 2015. Retrieved 23 July 2015.
  5. ↑ "Is Collaborative Divorce a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? | HuffPost null". 20 July 2011.
  6. ↑ "Divorce specialist designation picks up steam". Advisor's Edge. 28 May 2004.
  7. ↑ https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/fl-lf/famil/2005_1/pdf/2005_1.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  8. ↑ "Per the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals ("IACP")". Collaborativepractice.com. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  9. ↑ "Helping couples survive divorce". 2 June 2006.
  10. ↑ "Alternatives to Court". Resolution. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  11. ↑ "Collaborative Law". Spears WMS. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  12. ↑ Lech Mintowt-Czyz Last updated 31 December 2011 12:36 pm. "The Times – Senior judge says 'collaborative' approach can be extended". The Times. UK. Archived from the original on 9 October 2009. Retrieved 31 December 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  13. ↑ Rozenberg, Joshua (15 October 2008). "Daily Telegraph Fast-track separations for couples who agree". The Daily Telegraph. UK. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  14. ↑ "Launch of Collaborative Family Law Group". Collaborativefamilylaw.org.uk. Archived from the original on 2 January 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  15. ↑ Wozniak, Vanessa (1 December 2011). "Lord Wilson'sKeynote Address". The Lawyer. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  16. ↑ "IACP Networking and Educational Forum". International Academy of Collaborative Professionals. Archived from the original on 27 September 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  17. ↑ Cordover, Adam (28 August 2015). "Research - Collaborative Divorce by the Numbers (2010)". Family Diplomacy: A Collaborative Law Firm. Archived from the original on 27 September 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  18. ↑ "International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Website". Iaml.org. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  19. ↑ "Australia". Collaborativelaw.asn.au. Archived from the original on 13 November 2011. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  20. ↑ "Austria". avm.co.at. Archived from the original on 17 February 2009.
  21. ↑ "Austria". Rechtimdialog.at. Archived from the original on 24 February 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  22. ↑ "Canada". Collaborativelaw.ca. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  23. ↑ "Northern Ireland". Afriendlydivorce.co.uk. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  24. ↑ "Republic of Ireland". Acp.ie. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  25. ↑ EQ Design. "Scotland". Scottish-collaborativelawyers.com. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  26. ↑ "Resolution". Resolution. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  27. ↑ "Republic of Ireland-Galway". collaborativelawgalway.ie. Archived from the original on 3 September 2010. Retrieved 6 July 2019.
  28. ↑ "What is Collaborative Law - Resolve Cork". resolvecork.com. Archived from the original on 18 June 2013. Retrieved 13 September 2012. Obtaining Mechanic's Liens
  29. ↑ "Droit Collaboratif Accueil" (in French). Droit-collaboratif.org. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  30. ↑ "Collaborative Practice California Website". cpcal.org/. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
  31. ↑ "Collaborative Family Law Council of Florida Website". collaborativecouncilflorida.com/. Archived from the original on 13 April 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
  32. ↑ "Collaborative Divorce Texas's Website". collaborativedivorcetexas.com/. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
  33. ↑ "History of Collaborative Divorce Texas". collaborativedivorcetexas.com/. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
  34. ↑ "Collaborative Family Law Group of San Diego". collaborativefamilylawgroupsandiego.com/. Archived from the original on 9 January 2022. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
  35. ↑ "Family Divorce Solutions". familydivorcesolutions.com/. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
  36. ↑ "Next Generation Divorce of Tampa Bay". NextGenerationDivorce.com/. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
  37. ↑ "Collaborative Professionals of Dallas". cpofdallas.com/. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
  38. ↑ "Collaborative Divorce Solutions". collaborativedivorcesolution.com/. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
  39. ↑ "Cleveland Academy of Collaborative Professionals". collaborativepracticecleveland.com/. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
  40. ↑ "Missouri Collaborative Institute". missouricollaborativeinstitute.com. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
  41. ↑ "Collaborative Law Institute of Illinois". collabawil.org. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
  42. ↑ "Collaborative Law Act". Nccusl.org. Archived from the original on 17 May 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  43. ↑ "THE UNIFORM COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT AS A TEACHING TOOL" (PDF). Hofstra. Retrieved 10 March 2009.
  44. ↑ "Governor Scott Signs Collaborative Divorce Bill into Law". FamilyDiplomacy.com. Archived from the original on 2 August 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2016.
  45. ↑ "law.upenn.edu". law.upenn.edu. Archived from the original on 26 January 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  46. ↑ "Tampa Chief Judge Signs Administrative Order on Collaborative Divorce". abcfamilyblog.wordpress.com. 4 August 2012. Retrieved 22 May 2013.

Further reading

  1. ↑ Mosten, Forrest S.; Cordover, Adam B. (2018). Building A Successful Collaborative Family Law Practice. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association. ISBN   978-1-64105-241-2. Archived from the original on 21 July 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
  2. ↑ "Using a Financial Neutral in a Collaborative Divorce".
  3. ↑ Settlement Agreement Lawyers
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.