Dewoitine D.33

Last updated
D.33
Dewoitine D.33 L'Aerophile October 1932.jpg
RoleSingle-engine low-wing monoplane
Manufacturer Dewoitine
First flight1930
Primary user Air France
Variants D.332, D.333, D.338

The Dewoitine D.33 was a single-engine low-wing all-metal monoplane aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Dewoitine. [1] [2] It is best remembered for setting a long-distance world record on its maiden flight in 1930. [2]

Contents

The D.33 was developed in response to an initiative by the French Air Ministry to encourage advanced into the nation's industrial aeronautical capabilities. Dewoitine was only one of several companies to respond; the development process took roughly one year. Beyond the initial D.33 model, further derivatives of the aircraft were produced; there were three major variations to the type, each of which was designed as a separate aircraft. Largely due to the record breaking performance achieved, this line of aircraft were highly regarded and attracted considerable commercial interest throughout the 1930s. [1] Several of these derivatives were operated as an airliner by flag carrier Air France and even being used in a military context during the Second World War. Shortly after the end of the conflict, the remaining aircraft were retired, having become obsolete.

Development

The origins of the D.33 can be traced back to 1929 and the implementation of a wider policy of ordering prototypes to encourage technical progress by French aircraft companies. That year, the French Air Ministry issued a specification that sought a long-range aircraft that was suitable for setting international endurance and distance records; it specifically offered a generous bonus that would be paid if a range of 10,000 km could be demonstrated. Corresponding orders were placed with multiple entities, including Société des Avions Bernard, Blériot Aéronautique and Dewoitine. [3]

Design

The Dewoitine D.33 was a single-engine low-wing cantilever monoplane of all metal (duralumin) construction. [4] [5] It had a slim and streamlined fuselage, the main cross section of which had been intentionally reduced to a minimum. [6] The D.33 had a shell-type fuselage, which was common to Dewoitine designs of the era. [7] It was divided across numerous bulkheads and frames that were connected by four main U-section longerons and small stringers. Duralumin sheet panels covered the airframe's exterior. [7] In order to facilitate the fuselage's assembly, it was cut off behind the wing spar and attached to it by four bolts. The forward portion was connected with the rear portion by two bolts while the leading edge of the wing was connected to via four bolts. [8] The upper covering of the leading edge formed the floor of the cabin while the trailing edge did not pass through the fuselage as to permit the installation of the navigator's and radio operator's stations in the resulting space to the rear. [8]

The aircraft was typically flown by a crew of three (comprising a pilot, navigator and radio operator) that were seated in a tandem arrangement within an enclosed cabin. A passageway was provided between the different crew positions. [8] On account of the aircraft's long distance performance, various amenities and comfort features were provided for the crew; these included a couch that permitted rest breaks to be taken and a toilet. [9] The pilot, who was seated in front, had optimal visibility from their position. Their windshield had sliding panes and the roof could be rapidly opened for emergency egress via parachute. [8] The instrumentation panel, which was suspended elastically, was within easy line of sight for the pilot. Heated air could be drawn from behind the radiator via an adjustable trap. [8] The navigator's instrumentation included a compass, clock, air speed indicator, and altimeter. Electricity was generated by a retractable generator mounted on a telescopic mast. [10]

The wing of the D.33, which was composed of metal, had a trapezoidal form complete with elliptical wingtips. [5] Furthermore, it had a relatively high-aspect ratio, permitting it to achieve relatively high efficiency, [4] while still retaining a relatively low structural weight of 10 kg/m2 (2.05 lb./sq.ft.), which was considered to be particularly low for a metal wing. [6] Its structure used only a single spar, positioned at one-third of the chord from the leading edge; the lateral boxes at the centre of this structure formed the aircraft's 16 fuel tanks as well; these tanks proved to be resistant against not only the routine impact stresses of many take-offs and landings, but also deformation when the wing was intentionally overloaded. [11] The spar's supporting structure consisted of two duralumin-section flanges and two openwork sheet webs; stress was uniformly distributed by the flanges' decreasing thickness across the span. Box-type vertical compression members were also used; the oblique members, which normally worked in tension, were stiffened by Q sections. [12]

To ease ground transportation of, as well as repairs to, the aircraft, the wing was dividable into five sections. [12] The spar flanges, which differed in width across each section, were connected by sturdy hinges composed of high resistance steel able to withstand stresses of up to 100 tonnes (220,462 lb.). The sole spar could absorb all bending stresses without buckling despite its comparatively small width, partially due to the strong flanges. [12] The leading edge, which could withstand both drag and torsional stresses, comprised box ribs and plain ribs that were cross-braced using compact longitudinal strips. A smooth covering of sheet duralumin was present, its thickness varied according to the anticipated stresses of that particular area. [12] The leading edge was connected with the spar via two long hinges; all sections along the span were joined to one another using continuous hinges that followed the outline of the wing section. Stresses from the trailing edge, which was composed of riveted tubular ribs, were conveyed forwards to the spar. [12] In the centre of the wing, each solid rib was flanked by two lightened ribs as a weight reduction measure. [7]

In spite of the typical tendency for thin wings to induce vibration, there was no meaningful vibration generated by the D.33's wing across any engine speed or angle of attack flown. [6] Neither was any noticeable torsion of the wing tips present even in the event of an abrupt deflection of the ailerons while flown at high speeds. Even when flown in a fully-loaded configuration, the flight characteristics of the aircraft remained highly manoeuvrable as well as being inherently stability; even in rough skies, the D.33 was reportedly a satisfactory aircraft to fly. [13] It was also quite easy to both take-off as well as to land, in part due to the centre of gravity of the empty aircraft being slightly behind that of its placement when fully loaded. The low-mounted position of the wing was also conducive during both the take-off and landing phases of flight. [13] The ailerons were placed as close to the hinge axis as to reduce their centre of gravity and to reduce their inertia; to reduce the impact of jams, the ailerons were divided into several portions, each having two hinges. [7]

The aircraft was powered by a Hispano-Suiza 12N V12 engine that drove a two-bladed Ratier metal propeller. [3] [14] Measures to maximise propeller efficiency included the unobstructed nose of the engine cowling as well as its positioning being well forward of the leading edge of the wing. [15] Engine cooling was achieved via a honeycomb radiator that was located on the base of the fuselage; it could be partly retracted using tubular controls that worked in torsion and via a square-threaded screw. Reserve water tanks were also present both above the engine cylinders and within the fuselage. [16] The oil tank was located behind the engine, which was separated by a firewall. The blade-type radiator for the oil was located within the cowling. [16] A heating tube was present in the air intake. A Fire extinguisher were also located in the engine bay while a hand pump was also provisioned to mitigate against the failure of the mechanical pumps. [17]

The aircraft was furnished with a fixed tailwheel undercarriage. [4] It consists of a bent axle of uniform strength supported in front by a biconical tube and vertically by a shock absorber. The wheels were mounted on ball bearings and were equipped with brakes which that could be individually actuated by the pilot. [18] The axle was attached directly beneath the wing spar, permitting the shock absorber to transmit its stresses directly onto the spar, while the compression member rested on a fuselage frame at the connecting point for the engine bearer. The tail skid had a wheel, complete with a rubber tyre, that was supported by a multiple-braked spring type shock absorber in the stern post. [18]

The rear portion of the fuselage was strongly tapered as to increase the efficiency of the flight controls; this compact contact area did not permit the use of a cantilever stabilizer, thus it was instead braced by several small tubular struts. [18] The stabilizer had two parallel spars connected by ribs while the covering, which was applied in strips parallel to the spars, was stiffened by flanged edges and sections. The stabilizer was adjustable mid-flight by a square-threaded screw mounted on the rear spar and operated via a nut, cable, and wheel; the stabilizer's angle of incidence was indicated by a pointer. [18] The elevator flaps consisted of a channel-section front spar on which were mounted two removable panels that were internally stiffened by section members. Similar construction was used for the rudder. [18]

Variants

Dewoitine D.33 3-view drawing from NACA Aircraft Circular No.146 Dewoitine D.33 3-view NACA Aircraft Circular No.146.jpg
Dewoitine D.33 3-view drawing from NACA Aircraft Circular No.146

D.332

The D.332 was developed based on the original D.33. A single-spar cantilever low-wing monoplane, the D.332 had fundamental resemblances to the original design. [19] Able to hold a total of eight passengers, the D.332 had a small, enclosed cockpit, with an aerodynamic design and a rigid undercarriage. It was constructed purely from metal, and was built approximately three years after the original D.33 model, in 1933. [1]

The D.332 proved successful, ultimately achieving a best speed of over 250 km/h (155 mph), and during the initial tests, where it was flown by test pilot Marcel Doret, [19] the D.332 prototype successfully flew from Paris to Saigon. It did, however, crash on the return flight from Saigon, on 15 January 1935. [1] [19]

D.333

In 1934, the D.333 was designed, built and flown for the first time. It was different from its predecessors in that it was constructed with a more spacious cabin, and could hold a maximum of 10 passengers. [19] The primary buyer of this model was Air France; however, two of the three planes bought by the latter crashed while flying the distance between Toulouse and Dakar. [1] [19]

Dewotine D.333 "Cassiopee" F-ANQB Algeria 1938 Dewoitine D.333 Cassiopee F-ANQB Algerie 1938.jpg
Dewotine D.333 "Cassiopée" F-ANQB Algéria 1938

D.338

1935-6 saw the drafting and prototype of the D.338. This new model was built with retractable undercarriage, and could carry 22 passengers over a maximum of around 1,950 km (1,210 mi). Fitted with 485 kW (650 hp) Hispano-Suiza 9V16/17 engines, [19] the D.338 could travel at a speed of up to 260 km/h (160 mph).

The D.338 was the first truly successful model in the line, and became widely used by Air France, first for flights within Europe, and later for international flights, between France and various parts of Asia. A total of 31 D.338s were purchased by Air France, and they were used into the Second World War, where they were employed as troop transporters. Following their use in the conflict, only eight aircraft survived. [19] However, despite this, the basic model was still used for years, until more recent builds were designed.

D.342 and D.620

Dewoitine designed two one-off aircraft based on the D.33 line; the D.342 and the D.620. Very few details relating to the specifics of these two aircraft are known or documented. Both were heavily based on the D.338 in particular. [19]

Operators

Flag of France.svg  France

Specifications

Data fromLe Trait d'Union, [20] National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics [21]

General characteristics

Performance

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dewoitine D.500</span> 1932 French fighter aircraft

The Dewoitine D.500 was an all-metal, open-cockpit, fixed-undercarriage monoplane fighter aircraft designed and produced by French aircraft manufacturer Dewoitine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latécoère 28</span> Type of aircraft

The Latécoère 28 was a long distance monoplane aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Latécoère.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IAR 14</span> Romanian fighter and trainer aircraft

The IAR 14 is a Romanian low-wing monoplane fighter-trainer aircraft designed before World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ANF Les Mureaux 113</span> Type of aircraft

The ANF Les Mureaux 110 and its derivatives were a family of all-metal military reconnaissance aircraft developed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer ANF Les Mureaux.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latécoère 521</span> 1930s French flying boat

The Latécoère 521 was a French six-engined double deck flying boat designed and manufactured by Pierre-Georges Latécoère. At the time of its completion, it held the distinction of being the largest aircraft to be built in France as well as one of the first large passenger aircraft capable of flying trans-Atlantic routes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blériot 127</span> Type of aircraft

The Blériot 127 was a monoplane bomber aircraft developed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Blériot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dewoitine D.332</span> Type of aircraft

The Dewoitine D.332 was an eight-passenger airliner designed and built by the French aircraft manufacturer Dewoitine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bréguet 393T</span> 1931 airliner family by Bréguet

The Bréguet 390T, 392T and 393T were a family of French propeller-driven sesquiplane airliners designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Bréguet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bréguet 270</span> Type of aircraft

The Bréguet 270 was a sesquiplane military reconnaissance aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Breguet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Farman F.300</span> Type of aircraft

The Farman F.300 and F.310 were trimotor monoplane airliners designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Farman Aviation Works.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wibault 280</span> Type of aircraft

The Wibault 280-T was a monoplane trimotor airliner designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Wibault. Designed to accommodate up to 12 passengers in its largest variant, development of the aircraft was financially backed by the Penhoët shipyards, which led to the aircraft alternatively being referred to as 'Penhoët Wibault'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Potez 39</span> Type of aircraft

The Potez 39 was a twin-seat single-engined parasol wing monoplane aerial reconnaissance and observation aircraft designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Potez. It was the company's first all-metal aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Potez 53</span> Racing aircraft

The Potez 53 was a French low-wing enclosed cockpit single-seat cantilever monoplane racing aircraft built by Potez to specifically to compete in the 1933 Coupe Deutsch de la Meurthe race, which it won outright.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SAB AB-20</span> 1930s French bomber aircraft

The SAB AB-20 was a large four engine twin boom French bomber built in the early 1930s as a development of the Dyle et Bacalan DB-70 airliner. It featured a lifting body of thick airfoil section between the inner engines. It was later modified for the attack role; a second aircraft, the AB-21, had different engines and cleaner aerodynamics but no more were built.

The Bernard 80 GR was one of three types built by different French constructors in response to a government call for an aircraft capable of setting new long-distance records. A single engine monoplane with a crew of two, the 80 GR set an absolute record for flight over a closed circuit in April 1931, covering 8,960 km (5,569 mi). Modifications led to a new designation as the Bernard 81 GR but no more records were set despite several attempts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bréguet 410</span> Type of aircraft

The Bréguet 410 was an all-metal sesquiplane biplane bomber that was designed and produced by the French aircraft manufacturer Bréguet.

The Lioré et Olivier LeO 8, Lioré et Olivier LeO 8-Cau 2 or Lioré et Olivier LeO 8 CAN 2 was a French two seat, parasol wing monoplane night fighter and reconnaissance aircraft, built in 1923.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Les Mureaux 3</span> Type of aircraft

The Les Mureaux 3 C.2 and Les Mureaux 4 C.2 were French two seat, parasol winged fighters, flown in 1927-8, which differed only in their engines. They were developed into near identical army co-operation types, the ANF Les Mureaux 130 A.2 and ANF Les Mureaux 131 A.2, in 1929–31.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nieuport-Delage NiD 580</span> Type of aircraft

The Nieuport-Delage NiD 580 R.2 was a contender for a French government contract for a long range, two seat reconnaissance aircraft, issued in 1928. There were eight prototypes in the 1931-2 contest and the NiD 580 was not selected for production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dewoitine D.480</span> Type of aircraft

The Dewoitine D.480 was a French single engine side-by-side sports and training aircraft built in the early 1930s. Two were completed and flew with several different radial engines. One remained active through the 1950s.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Dewoitine D.33" . Retrieved 29 December 2007.
  2. 1 2 Durand, William Frederick - Aerodynamic Theory. A General Review of Progress. Under a Grant of the Guggenheim Fund for the Promotion of Aeronautics. Vol. 1. California Institute of Technology, 1943.
  3. 1 2 Borget Le album de fanatique de l'Aviation June–July 1969, p. 12.
  4. 1 2 3 Borget Le album de fanatique de l'Aviation August–September 1969, pp. 26–27.
  5. 1 2 Flight 10 April 1931, p. 314.
  6. 1 2 3 NACA 1931, p. 1.
  7. 1 2 3 4 NACA 1931, p. 3.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 NACA 1931, p. 4.
  9. L' Aéronautique May 1931, p. 160.
  10. NACA 1931, pp. 4-5.
  11. NACA 1931, pp. 1-3.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 NACA 1931, p. 2.
  13. 1 2 NACA 1931, pp. 1-2.
  14. NACA 1931, p. 8.
  15. NACA 1931, pp. 1, 5-6.
  16. 1 2 NACA 1931, p. 6.
  17. NACA 1931, pp. 6-7.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 NACA 1931, p. 5.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Taylor & Gunston 1980, p. 475.
  20. Revue Aéronautique de France July–August 1931, p. 5.
  21. NACA 1931, pp. 2-10.
  22. Borget Le album de fanatique de l'Aviation August–September 1969, p. 26.
  23. 1 2 Meurillon Le album de fanatique de l'Aviation August–September 1969, p. 24,
  24. Borget Le album de fanatique de l'Aviation August–September 1969, p. 27.

Bibliography