![]() | |
Dis-Chem Pharmacies | |
Company type | Public |
JSE: DCP | |
ISIN | ZAE000227831 |
Industry | Retail |
Founded | 1978[1] |
Founder | |
Headquarters | , |
Number of locations | 300+ (2025 [2] ) |
Area served | |
Revenue | R 39.17 billion (2025 [3] ) |
R 2.1 billion (2025 [3] ) | |
R 1.22 billion (2025 [3] ) | |
Total assets | R 19.26 million (2025 [3] ) |
Total equity | R 5.23 million (2025 [3] ) |
Number of employees | 18,500 (2025 [4] ) |
Website | www |
Dis-Chem Pharmacies Limited, commonly known as Dis-Chem, is the second-largest retail pharmacy chain in South Africa, operating over 300 stores across Southern Africa. The company offers a wide range of products, including third-party and private label items, both in-store and online, and operates a wholesale division. The company's head office is based in Midrand, Gauteng and is listen on the JSE under the ticker symbol as DCP. [2] [5] [6]
Dis-Chem was founded in 1978 by pharmacists Ivan and Lynette Saltzman. [1] [7] The pharmacy opened its first retail pharmacy in Mondeor, a southern suburb of Johannesburg. [8] The couple introduced the concept of a discount pharmacy, offering product categories that were previously unavailable in South African pharmacies due to restrictive legislation.
In 2014, Dis-Chem expanded internationally by opening its first store outside South Africa, in Windhoek, Namibia. [9] In November 2016, the company listed 27.5% of its share capital on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, raising approximately R 4.4 billion in what was then the second-largest initial public offering in the exchange's history. [10] [11] Following the IPO, Dis-Chem announced plans to double its number of outlets by 2021, with one-third of its stores being less than three years old at the time. [12]
In July 2020, the Competition Commission of South Africa found Dis-Chem guilty of inflating prices of certain hygiene products, such as disposable face masks, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tribunal imposed an administrative penalty of R 1.2 million [13] , significantly lower than the R 2 billion fine the Commission had initially sought. Dis-Chem chose not to appeal the decision, citing concerns over reputational harm. [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]