Economic liberalization in Myanmar

Last updated • 6 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

The economic liberalization of Myanmar refers to the policy of liberalization orienting Myanma laws toward an open market economy. This process was initiated following the coup d’état of the Burmese junta in 1988 in order to transform the underperforming Burmese economy.

Contents

Historical context

Following its decolonization in 1948, Burma showed a promising economic potential as the "rice mile" of Asia, becoming the worldwide number one exporter of rice from 1960 to 1963. [1] In 1962, Burma became a socialist country and the economy collapsed under the rule of the Burma Socialist Programme Party, following the program of the Burmese Way to Socialism. [2] [3] The first liberalization reforms occurred in 1987 under the new presidency of San Yu. [4] The full reorientation toward a market economy followed the instauration of the Burmese junta rule, after the coup d'état which established the State Law and Order Restoration Council. [5]

Liberalization reforms

There are two main patterns of the liberalization process. The first one, acted in September 1987, concerns the marketization and removal of restrictions in the sector of agriculture. From that point, individuals are free to grow any type of crop and export their agricultural production. [6] Those laws are significant in a country where 70% of the population is rural and its livelihoods are consequently mainly related to agriculture. [7] However, the liberalization was not complete since the rice market had been excluded from the reforms, and only experienced marketization during a second liberalization in 2004. [8]

The second one is the Foreign Investment Law of November 1988. This allows foreign capitals in a company from joint venture participation with a minimum of 35% of foreign holdings to a full detention with 100% of foreign equity. In order to attract foreign capitals, the law brings guarantees against the possibility of nationalization. It also ensures three years of tax exemption and the repatriation of profits. [9]

Impact of liberalization on economic activity and livelihood

The evaluation of the performance of the post-1988 Burmese economy is incomplete due to the lack of data released by the government and the absence or unreliability of official reports. Observation and analysis of liberalization policies on livelihood in Burma thus comes from the work of social scientists and journalists. The different reforms conducted tend to have boosted one economic sector which is the extraction of fossil fuels, mainly oil and gas. The opening to FDIs has given the opportunity to a range of foreign companies to initiate the exploitation of the rich natural resources of the Burmese soil. The rest of the economy is portrayed as having no real benefits from FDIs liberalization because of the high risks that represent the uncertainty of the Burmese economy to foreign investors. [10]

Perceived progresses

The US embassy in Rangoon has reported that the living conditions of peasants have increased as a result of the liberalization since the late 1980s, with rise in the farm incomes and access to a range of technologies including generator power and diesel fueled irrigation pumps that can replace animal powered alternatives. [11] Consequently, farmers do not need to secure food for their cattle and get less livelihood dependency on them (potential issues are feeding and treating animals).

Ikuko Okamoto analyses the effect of the second rice liberalization: "In the liberalization process... the private rice marketing sector was able to achieve self-sustaining development. The government’s policy to promote rice production and cut-backs in the volume of rice procurement increased the amount of rice sold in the market, which induced more traders to enter the rice-marketing business". [12] Liberalization was thus beneficial for the expansion of a private market in which new kind of jobs such as rice traders, gave new opportunities and livelihoods characteristic of market economies, outside traditional agricultural production.

The liberalization also implied the freedom for farmers to crop what they want and consequently to practice multiple cropping, eventually being less reliant on the growth of only one crop and the variations in the market prices of those ones. [13] Farmers are more likely to secure their income and consequently gain access to food and other basic necessities.

Critics of economic reforms results

The most frequently denounced collateral effect of liberalization on the livelihoods of Burmese people is the environmental degradation due to the multiplication of energy exploitation projects by foreign companies. A number of environmental issues critical to livelihoods are not tackled within the liberalization process. "Pressing environmental issues include public health, sanitation, clean drinking water, soil erosion, agricultural technological development, assessing the impact of importing foreign seeds and proper designs for irrigation projects". [14] The construction of pipelines is denounced by NGOs as a threat to livelihoods throughout the destruction farming lands and fishing grounds, which can also be classified as restricted access zones. [15] The simple consequence is the making of jobless populations in those areas where pipeline projects are pursued. The loss of farming land is not the only consequence: the example of construction of tourist resorts (tourism being the other activity expanding thanks to the FDIs reforms) destroying forests leaves no wood and bamboo to local population, making the construction of houses impossible. [16]

The development of the energy industry requires the employment of skilled workers. Foreign companies exploiting Burmese gas thus tend to import their employed workforce. [17] The Foreign Investment Law has been initially criticized for not prioritizing the human local development and employment enough. [18] It does not bring a new alternative to the third of the rural population that does not possess lands to secure a subsistence production. The lack of FDIs in other industrial sectors also causes employment issues in urban areas. [19] [20]

The marketization of agriculture is portrayed as being beneficial mainly to large-scale exploitation involved in agribusiness, more than to small landowners relying to subsistence farming. Large exploitation establishments threaten local farmers through their cheap production capacity and do not provide landless people livelihood alternatives: the mechanization of large scale plantations implies a limited number of job opportunities, and consequently lowers wage rates of rural workers. [21] [22]

Khin Maung Kyi et al. have also argued that macroeconomic policies inappropriate to the process of liberalization have caused high inflation. [23] The inflation rate between 1988 and 1996 is estimated at 1000%. [24] The purchasing power has consequently gone down, making the ability of poor Burmese to secure access to food and other primary commodities weaker, despite their progress in securing incomes. The liberalization of the market also has a wrong impact on the ability of farmers to grow crops because the free market system implies an "increase in the prices of fertilizer and other agricultural inputs". [25] The regularity of farming production is thus threatened.

Another point on which liberalization process in Burma has been denounced as misled is that it is incomplete. Market reforms often need to be tied to property law reforms. In Myanmar, despite liberalization, farmers are not protected from land confiscation when they are demarcated as wasteland, threatening the livelihood of subsistence farmers. [26]

The study of living standards indicator in Myanmar can also suggest that over the time, the situation has not progressed. Both the Central Statical Organization (CSO) in 1999 and the IHLCA Project Technical Unit in 2010 state that one-quarter of Burmese households spend 70% of their income on food. [27] [28] Accessing food security is thus still a problem despite the liberalization efforts. [29]

The liberalization impact can be summarized by Sean Turnell view, stating that the industries favored by the shift to market economy "create relatively few jobs and impose large environmental costs on the local population, so that they are doing little to create “the foundations for future growth”". [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Georgia (country)</span> Group of productive activities developed in Georgia

The economy of Georgia is an emerging free market economy. Its gross domestic product fell sharply following the dissolution of the Soviet Union but recovered in the mid-2000s, growing in double digits thanks to the economic and democratic reforms brought by the peaceful Rose Revolution. Georgia continued its economic progress since "moving from a near-failed state in 2003 to a relatively well-functioning market economy in 2014". In 2007, the World Bank named Georgia the World's number one economic reformer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Laos</span>

The economy of Laos is a lower-middle income developing economy. Being a socialist state, the Lao economic model resembles the Chinese socialist market and/or Vietnamese socialist-oriented market economies by combining high degrees of state ownership with openness to foreign direct investment and private ownership in a predominantly market-based framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Myanmar</span>

The economy of Myanmar is the seventh largest in Southeast Asia. After the return of civilian rule in 2011, the new government launched large-scale reforms, focused initially on the political system to restore peace and achieve national unity and moving quickly to an economic and social reform program. Current economic statistics were a huge decline from the economic statistics of Myanmar in the fiscal year of 2020, in which Myanmar’s nominal GDP was $81.26 billion and its purchasing power adjusted GDP was $279.14 billion. Myanmar has faced an economic crisis since the 2021 coup d'état. According to International Monetary Fund (IMF) Myanmar GDP per capita in 2024 is estimated to reach $1.179

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Vietnam</span>

The economy of Vietnam is a developing mixed socialist-oriented market economy. It is the 33rd-largest economy in the world by nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and the 26th-largest economy in the world by purchasing power parity (PPP). It is a lower-middle income country with a low cost of living. Vietnam is a member of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the World Trade Organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agricultural subsidy</span> Governmental subsidy paid to farmers and agribusinesses

An agricultural subsidy is a government incentive paid to agribusinesses, agricultural organizations and farms to supplement their income, manage the supply of agricultural commodities, and influence the cost and supply of such commodities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nanyang (region)</span> Chinese name for the region of Southeast Asia, literally meaning "southern ocean"

Nanyang is the Chinese term for the warmer and fertile geographical region along the southern coastal regions of China and beyond, otherwise known as the 'South Sea' or Southeast Asia. The term came into common usage in self-reference to the large ethnic Chinese migrant population in Southeast Asia, and is contrasted with Xiyang, which refers to the Western world, Dongyang, which refers to Japan. The Chinese press regularly uses the term to refer to the region stretching from Yunnan Province to Singapore and from Myanmar (Burma) to Vietnam ; in addition, the term also refers to Brunei, East Malaysia, East Timor, Indonesia and the Philippines in the region it encompasses.

The Licence Raj or Permit Raj is a pejorative for the system of strict government control and regulation of the Indian economy that was in place from the 1950s to the early 1990s. Under this system, businesses in India were required to obtain licences from the government in order to operate, and these licences were often difficult to obtain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in the Empire of Japan</span>

Agriculture in the Empire of Japan was an important component of the pre-war Japanese economy. Although Japan had only 16% of its land area under cultivation before the Pacific War, over 45% of households made a living from farming. Japanese cultivated land was mostly dedicated to rice, which accounted for 15% of world rice production in 1937.

Đổi Mới is the name given to the economic reforms initiated in Vietnam in 1986 with the goal of creating a "socialist-oriented market economy". The term đổi mới itself is a general term with wide use in the Vietnamese language meaning "innovate" or "renovate". However, the Đổi Mới Policy refers specifically to these reforms that sought to transition Vietnam from a command economy to a socialist-oriented market economy.

Economic liberalization, or economic liberalisation, is the lessening of government regulations and restrictions in an economy in exchange for greater participation by private entities. In politics, the doctrine is associated with classical liberalism and neoliberalism. Liberalization in short is "the removal of controls" to encourage economic development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shwe Mann</span> Burmese general and politician

Thura Shwe Mann is a Burmese politician who was Speaker of the Pyithu Hluttaw, the lower house of parliament from 31 January 2011 to 29 January 2016. He is a former army general and, whilst being a protégé of senior general Than Shwe, was considered the third most powerful man in the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), which ruled Myanmar until 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of the World Trade Organization</span> Criticism directed at the World Trade Organization

Since its creation in 1995, the World Trade Organization (WTO) has worked to maintain and develop international trade. As one of the largest international economic organizations, it has strong influence and control over trading rules and agreements, and thus has the ability to affect a country's economy immensely. The WTO policies aim to balance tariffs and other forms of economic protection with a trade liberalization policy, and to "ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably and freely as possible". Indeed, the WTO claims that its actions "cut living costs and raise standards, stimulate economic growth and development, help countries develop, [and] give the weak a stronger voice." Statistically speaking, global trade has consistently grown between one and six percent per annum over the past decade, and US$38.8 billion were allocated to Aid for Trade in 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of Commerce (Myanmar)</span>

The Ministry of Commerce (MOC) is the Burmese government agency plays a vital role in the transformation process of the implementation of a market-oriented economic system. Its headquarters is located at Building 3 and 52, Nay Pyi Taw, in Myanmar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Retailing in India</span>

Retailing in India is one of the pillars of its economy and accounts for about 10 percent of its GDP. The Indian retail market is estimated to be worth $1.3 trillion as of 2022. India is one of the fastest growing retail markets in the world, with 1.4 billion people.

The economic liberalisation in India refers to the series of policy changes aimed at opening up the country's economy to the world, with the objective of making it more market-oriented and consumption-driven. The goal was to expand the role of private and foreign investment, which was seen as a means of achieving economic growth and development. Although some attempts at liberalisation were made in 1966 and the early 1980s, a more thorough liberalisation was initiated in 1991.

Globalization is a process that encompasses the causes, courses, and consequences of transnational and transcultural integration of human and non-human activities. India had the distinction of being the world's largest economy till the end of the Mughal era, as it accounted for about 32.9% share of world GDP and about 17% of the world population. The goods produced in India had long been exported to far off destinations across the world; the concept of globalization is hardly new to India.

The Chinese economic reform or Chinese economic miracle, also known domestically as reform and opening-up, refers to a variety of economic reforms termed "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and "socialist market economy" in the People's Republic of China (PRC) that began in the late 20th century, after Mao Zedong's death in 1976. Guided by Deng Xiaoping, who is often credited as the "General Architect", the reforms were launched by reformists within the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on December 18, 1978, during the Boluan Fanzheng period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic history of the Philippines</span>

The economic history of the Philippines is shaped by its colonial past, evolving governance, and integration into the global economy.

Myanma Economic Holdings Public Company Limited is one of two major conglomerates run by the Burmese military, the other being the Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC). MEHL business interests include banking, construction, mining, agriculture, tobacco and food.

Zaw Win Shein is a Burmese businessperson best known for founding Ayeyar Hinthar Holdings. He was born and raised in the Ayeyarwady Delta Region; Hinthada Township, which is Myanmar's main rice-producing region. At the age of 16, after his matriculation, Zaw Win Shein worked as an apprentice in his parents' agricultural products and rice export business. His father is U Thann Sein. Zaw Win Shein embarked on his business journey at 19, borrowing a few hundred thousand dollars from his parents to establish Seven Aluminium Company in 2006, addressing the scarcity of construction materials and quality aluminum fabrication in Myanmar. In 2007, he initiated Ayeyar Hinthar Trading Co., exporting high-quality rice and agricultural products, and capitalizing on government policy changes.

References

  1. ↑ Springer, John. "Reflecting On Myanmar's (Burma's) Future". Forbes.com. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  2. ↑ Fenichel, Allen; Khan, Azfar (1981). "The Burmese Way to 'Socialism'". World Development. 9 (9110): 813–824. doi:10.1016/0305-750x(81)90043-7.
  3. ↑ Cook, Paul; Minogue, Martin (1993). "Economic Reform and Political Change in Myanmar (Burma)". World Development. 21 (7): 1152. doi:10.1016/0305-750x(93)90005-t.
  4. ↑ Rigg, Jonathan (1997). Southeast Asia : the human landscape of modernization and development (Reprint. ed.). London: Routledge. p.  15. ISBN   0415139201.
  5. ↑ Kubo, Koji (2013). "Myanmar's two decades of partial transition to a market economy: a negative legacy for the new government". Post-Communist Economies. 25 (3): 358. doi:10.1080/14631377.2013.813141. S2CID   154466296.
  6. ↑ Rigg, Jonathan (1997). Southeast Asia : the human landscape of modernization and development (Reprint. ed.). London: Routledge. p.  15. ISBN   0415139201.
  7. ↑ UNDP. "About Myanmar". mm.undp.org. Retrieved 10 October 2014.
  8. ↑ Okamoto,Ikuko. "Chapter 7: Transforming Myanmar’s rice marketing" in Skidmore, Monique; (eds.), Trevor Wilson (2007). Myanmar : the state, community and the environment. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press. p. 152. ISBN   9780731538119.{{cite book}}: |last2= has generic name (help)
  9. ↑ Rigg, Jonathan (1997). Southeast Asia : the human landscape of modernization and development (Reprint. ed.). London: Routledge. p.  15. ISBN   0415139201.
  10. ↑ Bissinger, Jared (2012). "Foreign Investment in Myanmar: A Resource Boom but a Development Bust?". Contemporary Southeast Asia. 34 (1): 23–52. doi:10.1355/cs34-1b.
  11. ↑ Thawnghmung, Ardeth Maung (2004). Behind the teak curtain : authoritarianism, agricultural policies and political legitimacy in rural Burma/Myanmar ([New ed.]. ed.). London [u.a.]: Kegan Paul. p. 134. ISBN   071030935X.
  12. ↑ Okamoto,Ikuko. "Chapter 7: Transforming Myanmar’s rice marketing" in Skidmore, Monique; (eds.), Trevor Wilson (2007). Myanmar : the state, community and the environment. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press. p. 154. ISBN   9780731538119.{{cite book}}: |last2= has generic name (help)
  13. ↑ Thawnghmung, Ardeth Maung (2004). Behind the teak curtain : authoritarianism, agricultural policies and political legitimacy in rural Burma/Myanmar ([New ed.]. ed.). London [u.a.]: Kegan Paul. p. 134. ISBN   071030935X.
  14. ↑ Myint, Tun "Chapter 9: Environmental governance" in Skidmore, Monique; (eds.), Trevor Wilson (2007). Myanmar : the state, community and the environment. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press. p. 200. ISBN   9780731538119.{{cite book}}: |last2= has generic name (help)
  15. ↑ "Sold Out" (PDF). shwe.org/. Retrieved 4 October 2014.
  16. ↑ Hudson-Rodd, Nancy; Htay, Sein (2008). Arbitrary confiscation of farmers' land by the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) military regime in Burma (1st pub. ed.). Rockville, MD: The Burma Fund. p. 87. ISBN   978-974-8349-36-7.
  17. ↑ McCarthy, Stephen (2000). "Ten Years of Chaos in Burma: Foreign Investment and Economic Liberalization under the SLORC-SPDC, 1988 to 1998". Pacific Affairs. 73 (2): 235. doi:10.2307/2672179. JSTOR   2672179.
  18. ↑ McCarthy, Stephen (2000). "Ten Years of Chaos in Burma: Foreign Investment and Economic Liberalization under the SLORC-SPDC, 1988 to 1998". Pacific Affairs. 73 (2): 235. doi:10.2307/2672179. JSTOR   2672179.
  19. ↑ Turnell,Sean. "Chapter 6: Myanmar’s economy in 2006" in Skidmore, Monique; (eds.), Trevor Wilson (2007). Myanmar : the state, community and the environment. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press. p. 122. ISBN   9780731538119.{{cite book}}: |last2= has generic name (help)
  20. ↑ Shobert, Benjamin. "Myanmar Enters A Critical Transition". Forbes.com. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  21. ↑ Haggblade, Steven; et al. (2014). "Strategic Choices Shaping Agriculture Performance and Food Security on Myanmar". Journal of International Affairs. 67 (2): 59.
  22. ↑ Kattelus, Mirja; Rahaman, Muhammad Mizanur; Varis, Olli (2014). "Myanmar under reform: Emerging pressures on water, energy and food security". Natural Resources Forum. 38 (2): 93. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12032.
  23. ↑ Maung Kyi, Khin; et al. (2000). Economic development of Burma : a vision and a strategy. Stockholm, Sweden: Olof Palme Internat. Center. p. 131. ISBN   918-883616-9.
  24. ↑ Maung Kyi, Khin; et al. (2000). Economic development of Burma : a vision and a strategy. Stockholm, Sweden: Olof Palme Internat. Center. p. 134. ISBN   918-883616-9.
  25. ↑ Thawnghmung, Ardeth Maung (2004). Behind the teak curtain : authoritarianism, agricultural policies and political legitimacy in rural Burma/Myanmar ([New ed.]. ed.). London [u.a.]: Kegan Paul. p. 149. ISBN   071030935X.
  26. ↑ Kattelus, Mirja; Rahaman, Muhammad Mizanur; Varis, Olli (2014). "Myanmar under reform: Emerging pressures on water, energy and food security". Natural Resources Forum. 38 (2): 90. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12032.
  27. ↑ Hudson-Rodd, Nancy; Htay, Sein (2008). Arbitrary confiscation of farmers' land by the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) military regime in Burma (1st pub. ed.). Rockville, MD: The Burma Fund. p. 88. ISBN   978-974-8349-36-7.
  28. ↑ Haggblade, Steven; et al. (2014). "Strategic Choices Shaping Agriculture Performance and Food Security on Myanmar". Journal of International Affairs. 67 (2): 55–56.
  29. ↑ Haggblade, Steven; et al. (2014). "Strategic Choices Shaping Agriculture Performance and Food Security on Myanmar". Journal of International Affairs. 67 (2): 55.
  30. ↑ Bland, Ben. "Western investors target Burma". Financial Times. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.