Garre language

Last updated
Garre
Af-Garre
اف الخرّيي
Native to Kenya, Somalia
Region Mandera, Bay, Lower Shabelle
Ethnicity Garre Somalis
Native speakers
690,000 (2019–2020) [1]
Language codes
ISO 639-3 gex
Glottolog garr1259
ELP Garre

Garre (also known as Af-Garre) is a Somali language spoken by the Garre who reside in southern Somalia, Ethiopia and northern Kenya. It belongs to the family's Cushitic branch, and had an estimated 50,000 speakers in Somalia in 1992, 57,500 in 2006 and 86,000 in 2020. [1] The total number of speakers in Kenya and Somalia was estimated at 685,600 in 2019. Garre is in the Digil classification of Somali dialects. [2] Garre language is readily intelligible to Digil speakers, as it has some affinity with Af-Maay and Af-Boon. [3]

Contents

Classification

The Garre language is in the Digil classification of Somali dialects, other Digil Somali dialects are; Af-Tunni, Af Dabarre and Af-Jiddu. [4] The Digil dialects are the most heterogenous dialect group of all the Somali Democratic Republic and it is indeed questionable, whether they form a single group, or whether each single Digil dialect constitutes its separate group. This does not apply so much to Tunni and Dabarre but it does to Garre. [4] We anticipate our doubts about the legitimacy of including the Garre to the Digil dialects, both on the basis of agnatic considerations (the Garre not being Digil at all, nor Sab, but pre-Hawiya ) [5] and linguistic: the traits that connect Garre to the dialects of the river region are essentially phonological (for example, the absence of pharyngeals), syntactic (the marking of interrogation suffixed to the verb, in part the system of marking the focus), lexical and morphology [5]

They are exclusively divided in two groups, Garre Tuuf and Garre Quranyow. The Quranyow dialect is strongly influenced by Maay and they claimed that Tuuf dialect is the pure Af-Garre. [6] [7] This affirms that while the two dialects are not associated with different geographical areas, the Garre language is "one of the most heterogeneous dialects of Somali", for example the loss of prefix conjugation between the Garre in Baydhaba region, as in Maay, the dominant language in the area, of versus to its conservation among the Garre of Qoryooley and Buurhakaba. [6]

Geographic Distribution

For a reconstruction of the historical movements of the Af-Garre which places its original site in the interfluvial area, perhaps near the upper River Juba, the dialect described the one spoken by the Garre (especially Tuuf) [8] of the Basso Shabeelle: the garre of this area would be the only ones to have maintain their language specific to them; as for the Garre of the Mandera region[ "Around Dolo on the upper Juba "] [9] and, further west, up to Moyale, they speak essentially a Borana dialect, most as their bilingual language; and then there is Garre Libin (Garre of the West that is Ethiopia and Kenya) and Garre Kofar (Garre in Qoroyoley) [8]

Af-Garre is spoken in the districts of Baydhaba, Dhiinsor, Buurhakaba and Qoryooley is one of the heterogeneous dialect of Somalia; in fact, some Garreh dialects ( those in Buurhakaba and Qoryooley) have, for instance, preserved the conjugations with prefixes to date, while others (those of Baydhaba) have already given it up. Also, the typical Digil plural morpheme has been replaced in some Garre dialects (especially in those around Baydhaba) by the common southern Somali morphemeyaal. [4]

Phonology

Consonants

Garre has 22 consonant phonemes.

Garre consonant phonemes variety [10]
Bilabial Labiodental Dental Alveolar Post-alveolar Palatal Palato

alveolar

Velar Uvular Glottal
Plosive voicedbdɖgɢ
voicelesstkʔ
implosive ʄ
Affricate voicedt͡ʃ
Fricatives voicelessfsʃx~χh
Nasals mnɲŋ
Liquid l
Vibrant r
Semivowels wy

Occlusive consonants

Devoicing and neutralization

At the end of a word, the voiced stops b, d are devoiced: E1: b, d → p, t / __≠

  • /karab/[karap] 'shoulder'
  • /heed/[heet] 'sickle'

In this position, therefore, the voicing opposition of /d/ and /t/ is neutralized.

At the end of a word, /g/ becomes a glottal stop: E2: g → ʔ/__

  • /maʔag/[maʔaʔ] 'name'

Often, in the final position of a word followed by a word starting in a consonant, an occlusive is not exploded.

E3: OCCL → OCCL'/__≠ C__≠

(OCCL': occlusive is not exploited)

This happens in particular if the two words are morphologically united, as in the periphrastic verbal forms: [10]

(3) usu wa ara[g]šrə 'he was selling' (habitually).

On the other hand, spirantization of voiced stops in intervocalic positions, such as is present for example in Dabarte, does not seem to occur in Garre. - at least of the tuuf dialect variety of Qoryooley - [11]

The spirantization and the passage of b to w are instead quite frequent in the list of words Garres, e.g.

  • hawar = habar 'woman'
  • taweel = tabeel 'wind'

This is a typical feature of the Garre dialect spoken in the Baydhaba area. A similar process occurs in the Maay dialect of the same region. [12]

Despite the existence of the implosive /ʄ/, the postalveolar /ɖ/ is never glottalized. [10]

q

From our articulated [G] (voiced uvular stop), in general also in intervocalic position; its fricativization in [ ʁ] could be a derivation of the Qoryoley dialect; we have been given pairs such as sii[G]a (T.) ~ sii[ ʁ]a (Q.) “dust”.

In a few cases, however, there is constantly realized [ ʁ] in intervocalic position, as in ho[ ʁ]al "cloud".

As in the other dialects of the region, [13] in final q and realized ʔ:

E4: q → ʔ/__≠

(4) duq → [duʔ] __≠ "elderly

ʔ

In the initial position of speech, in front of vowel and sometimes realized a glottal occlusion, especially at the beginning of a sentence or in the case that the word in question is emphasized: but in most cases this exclusion glottal is not ubidable[ check spelling ]. However, we believe that ʔ is Phonologically present in all the words K. "beginning in a vowel" - consequently, all the words K. begin phonologically in a consonant. A proof of the presence of initial ʔ is given of the present tense of the verbs of the fourth conjugation by suffixing the present with prefixes of "to be" to the theme:

the theme of the verb will be affixed ahay "I am", in front of which a final nasal theme will be created ɳ, that is, as in front of a consonant with a backward articulation point (for example, in front of the masculine morpheme, the present of wiin "be great", and wiiɳahay.

It could also be argued that in this form "n" passes to " ɳ " since the word boundary is preserved between "wiin and ahay" - that is, "n" would be found in the other context in which " ɳ " is created . But a similar argument is falsified by the examination of other forms of the same paradigm, in which there is an assimilation between the final consonant of the theme and the initial consonant of the paradigm of "being"; thus, is wiinahay, which derives from wiin + tahay. [14]

We are therefore forced to choose between two possible alternatives: the phonemic, distinctive consideration, the presence of an initial ʔ - but in this case it would be difficult to explain its possible occurrence in certain contexts for all the words "beginning in a vowel"; or, and it is the alternative we propose, put a ʔ phonological for all words which would otherwise begin in a vowel - and which as such are often phonetically spelled A similar alternative and has adapted, with similar arguments, by Hayward in the description of the Arbore. [15]

However, being totally predictable, we do not indicate this initial ʔ in the transcription.

ʔ also appears in the median position, but it seems that within the but it is always intervocalic - with a preference for the Sequence -a? a- - and encounters with other consonants are excluded (which instead are allowed with suffixes):

5) maʔag="name"

naʔas = "'breast"

towaʔdii = "the jackal" (towaʔ + -tii anaphoric determinant: )

ʔ also appears at the end of a word:

(6) karaʔ = "Rope used to wear/put the camel's chest"

 suusaʔ "Milk curds of camel"

kubaʔ = "Thunder"

The phonemic of ʔ at the end also confirmed by the treatment of the masculine morpheme k of the article, which falls after ʔas after the other consonants. [14]

Occlusive glottalize

The only glottalized consonant is the palatal implosive /ʄ/. It is not found at the end of a word. Examples in initial position:

  • /ʄiif/ 'pleasure'
  • /ʄeeh/ 'slash'

Examples in the middle position:

  • /maʄooʄi/ 'to crush'
  • /ʄeʄab/ 'pot-shards'

Fricatives

A voiceless velar fricative /x/ appears in very few words, some evidently borrowed, e.e. /taxtar/ 'doctor' (S.St takhtar), but also, for example, in /xonton/ 'fifty', where one would expect Konton. ( pharyngeal fricative /ħ/, written x in Somali orthography, is absent in Garre.)

The voiceless glottal fricative /h/ appears both in the initial position

  • hamal 'leaf'
  • hedid 'root'
  • hebiin 'night'

and medially:

  • deheb 'gold'
  • ahsaan 'please, thank you'
  • bahall 'snake'

In the final position, it seems to freely alternate with [ʔ]:

  • lih ~ liʔ 'six'
  • ɖeh ~ ɖeʔ "Di" (opp. ɖehnə ’plural" ɖaha)

This alternation does not seem to extend to words ending in an etymological /ʔ/ (e.g. kubaʔ 'thunder', S.ST. gugac). The alternance / h / ~ / ʔ / therefore seems to be an areal phenomenon not specific to a dialect.

Nasal occlusives

General phonetic and phonological processes

The nasals are subject to numerous assimilatory processes and restrictions

of occurrence in certain positions. While the phonemic stats of bilabial nasal 'm' and of a dental 'n' and also, to a limited extent, of a palatal 'p', do not create problems, different is the case of the velar 'ɳ'. First of all, in many contexts The articulation of the nasal is determined by the following sound, to which the nasal is assimilated at the point of articulation. Opposite, respectively, a bilabial, a dental and a velar (or a more rearward joint), a kind of nasal & possible

E5: N → m/__b

(ie: a nasal is articulated as bilabial in front of a b).

E6: N → n/__d,t

(that is: a nasal is articulated n in front of a dental occlusive).

E7: N → ɳ/__g,k,q ʔ

(that is: a nasal is articulated as a veil in front of an occlusion with a velar or more rearward articulation point).

A nasal, furthermore, is articulated 4 at the end of a word:≠

E8: N → ɳ/__≠

and passes to "n" in front of the palatal semivocal y:

E9: N → ɳ/__y

These rules apply, as well as within the topic, in the delicate posting of nominal and verbal endings. As for the joint phenomena specifically, In addition to the rules we have given, there are no other restrictions on the occurrence in any position of "m and n" '. The case of p and β is different.

ɲ

In the collected material, the palatal nasal never appears in the final word position. Initially it only occurs in ɲuuq “little; small" and in the videophone ɲa" eat! " (with the same meaning ɲ can be pre-glottidalized: ʔɲaa, we also need j-a); it is natural to connect this form to the singular imperative of "eating" in Oromo: nyaaddhu.

In many cases the presence of "ɲ" in the median position is determined by the application of E7 in the encounter between a theme in the nasal and a suffix; for example, wiin + yahay→ wiiɲahay"he is great", lan + yaw ~ laɲaw "oh name!" (vocative).

However, "ɲ" appears in the lexicon, albeit to a limited extent; for example in:

(11) maaɲo “tare”

gaɲɲuuf “saliva”

mapaʔ "Milk at the first stage of acidity"

Given the impossibility of deriving these ʔ cases from the application of a more general phonemic process, I consider ɲphonemic in K.

ŋ

The status of 'ŋ' in Garre is rather complex: it is excluded in the initial word position and appears only in very few words in the middle position, for example in haŋuur "'food" and foŋor "cracking (of vase)" . In these forms a veil or uvular is completely assimilated to the previous nasal:

compare hunguri dialect fonqor of the dialect Qoryoley. - the latter form derived by dissimilation from + foggorr: Ali (1985: 345: n, 59} reports faqqar (glossing pot missing pieces), It's the same shape as faŋar.

As we have seen ( E8), “ŋ” appears in the final position, where seems to be the only possible nasal {equal in Maay, cf. Saced (1982: 5)]. But a final nasal is also performed ŋ in the intervocalic position, and precisely when an article or a possessive is affixed to a nasal masculine noun, determinants in which the morpheme of masculine & falls, the union of word "uomo" and of the (masculine) article "ka" will therefore give "laga".

In K. - at least in T. dialect - a process seems to operate which resolves a nasal + velar connection by assimilating the latter to the nasal, which becomes velarized in ŋ; this process is lexically determined, given that with other determinants (the anaphoric and the indeterminate / interrogative) the link ŋk is preserved (naturally realized [ŋ k], E7); but it could also depend on the rhythm of the sentence (more frequent with a fast pace and an informal style).

We will have lost:

Morphemic representation | phonological | phonetics

/ian/ + /ka/ lanka [laŋka]

[laŋa]

Of the phonetic representations, the earliest & data from the application of E7 (N → ŋ / __k), the second from the application of the (lexically determined) process of resolution of the link nk.

On the contrary, with female names we will have:

Morphemic representation | phonological | phonetics

/islaan / + / ta / islaanta [isiaanta]

[islaanna]

[islaana]

The first phonetic representation is given by the application of E6 (N ~ n/ _t), the second from the assimilation of the dental to the nasal, Which can be subsequently determined (giving [islaana]).

Consequently, n and ŋ often distinguish, in an intervocalic position, the gender of the noun. On the basis of its possibility of occurrence in the intervocalic position - where the other nasals are naturally also allowed - we recognize the phonemic status of ŋ. In fact, phonological representations such as lanka and islaanta would be not only too distant from the phonetic forms laŋa and islaana, but the latter. they are not even linked to their presumed phonological representations by general processes (and non lexically or morphologically determined),

Only in the median [ŋ] phonetic position will ŋ be transcribed in the final - given its complete predictability - we will transcribe n. [16]

1.2. Vowels

The vowel system of Garre. it seems to include 11 phonemes in total: 6 short and 5 long; the inhomogeneity in the number of phonemes of the two subsystems of long and short vowels is given by the presence, between the short vowels, of ə [16]

The collected material does not allow to ascertain the presence of an opposition between advanced vowels (V) and vowels (V), as described for the north-central Somali(but not for the dialects of the river region),

the vowel system of Garre. can therefore be represented as follows:

Long and short vowel Afgarre vowel.png
Long and short vowel

1.2.1. "ə" and the problem of vowel length at the end of a word

The phonological status of ‘ə’ and problematic and the situation in Garre. appears in many ways similar to that of the Maay described by Saeed (1982; 7). In particular, the question is whether ə should be considered a phoneme or the result of short vowel reduction rules. Not without doubts, we will consider "e" - historically derived certainly from the reduction of short vowels - as a phonological in

The following is to be considered a simple contribution to the problem, not a solution to it.

Related Research Articles

Unless otherwise noted, statements in this article refer to Standard Finnish, which is based on the dialect spoken in the former Häme Province in central south Finland. Standard Finnish is used by professional speakers, such as reporters and news presenters on television.

Sandhi is any of a wide variety of sound changes that occur at morpheme or word boundaries. Examples include fusion of sounds across word boundaries and the alteration of one sound depending on nearby sounds or the grammatical function of the adjacent words. Sandhi belongs to morphophonology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glottal stop</span> Sound made by stopping airflow in the glottis

The glottal stop or glottal plosive is a type of consonantal sound used in many spoken languages, produced by obstructing airflow in the vocal tract or, more precisely, the glottis. The symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet that represents this sound is ⟨ʔ⟩.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Makassarese language</span> Austronesian language of South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Makassarese, sometimes called Makasar, Makassar, or Macassar, is a language of the Makassarese people, spoken in South Sulawesi province of Indonesia. It is a member of the South Sulawesi group of the Austronesian language family, and thus closely related to, among others, Buginese, also known as Bugis. The areas where Makassarese is spoken include the Gowa, Sinjai, Maros, Takalar, Jeneponto, Bantaeng, Pangkajene and Islands, Bulukumba, and Selayar Islands Regencies, and Makassar. Within the Austronesian language family, Makassarese is part of the South Sulawesi language group, although its vocabulary is considered divergent compared to its closest relatives. In 2000, Makassarese had approximately 2.1 million native speakers.

In linguistics, lenition is a sound change that alters consonants, making them more sonorous. The word lenition itself means "softening" or "weakening". Lenition can happen both synchronically and diachronically. Lenition can involve such changes as voicing a voiceless consonant, causing a consonant to relax occlusion, to lose its place of articulation, or even causing a consonant to disappear entirely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Somali language</span> Cushitic language of the Horn of Africa

Somali is an Afroasiatic language belonging to the Cushitic branch. It is spoken primarily in Greater Somalia, and by the Somali diaspora as a mother tongue. Somali is an official language in both Somalia and Ethiopia, and serves as a national language in Djibouti, it is also a recognised minority language in Kenya. The Somali language is officially written with the Latin alphabet although the Arabic script and several Somali scripts like Osmanya, Kaddare and the Borama script are informally used.

Gǀui or Gǀwi is a Khoe dialect of Botswana with 2,500 speakers. It is part of the Gǁana dialect cluster, and is closely related to Naro. It has a number of loan words from ǂʼAmkoe. Gǀui, ǂʼAmkoe, and Taa form the core of the Kalahari Basin sprachbund, and share a number of characteristic features, including extremely large consonant inventories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sandawe language</span> Language isolate of central Tanzania

Sandawe is a language spoken by about 60,000 Sandawe people in the Dodoma Region of Tanzania. Sandawe's use of click consonants, a rare feature shared with only two other languages of East Africa – Hadza and Dahalo, had been the basis of its classification as a member of the defunct Khoisan family of Southern Africa since Albert Drexel in the 1920s. Recent investigations however suggest that Sandawe may be related to the Khoe family regardless of the validity of Khoisan as a whole. A discussion of Sandawe's linguistic classification can be found in Sands (1998).

The phonological history of English includes various changes in the phonology of consonant clusters.

Wintu is a Wintu language which was spoken by the Wintu people of Northern California. It was the northernmost member of the Wintun family of languages. The Wintun family of languages was spoken in the Shasta County, Trinity County, Sacramento River Valley and in adjacent areas up to the Carquinez Strait of San Francisco Bay. Wintun is a branch of the hypothetical Penutian language phylum or stock of languages of western North America, more closely related to four other families of Penutian languages spoken in California: Maiduan, Miwokan, Yokuts, and Costanoan.

This article describes the phonology of the Somali language.

This article describes those aspects of the phonological history of English which concern consonants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saanich dialect</span> Language of the Saanich people of North America

Saanich is the language of the First Nations Saanich people in the Pacific Northwest region of northwestern North America. Saanich is a Coast Salishan language in the Northern Straits dialect continuum, the varieties of which are closely related to the Klallam language.

The phonological system of the Hawaiian language is based on documentation from those who developed the Hawaiian alphabet during the 1820s as well as scholarly research conducted by lexicographers and linguists from 1949 to present.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maay Maay</span> Somali dialect

Mai-Mai, commonly spelled Maay Maay, is a dialect of the Somali language of the Cushitic branch of the Afro-Asiatic family. It is mainly spoken in Somalia and adjacent parts of Ethiopia and Kenya. In Somalia, it is spoken in South West state, Jubaland state, and Banadir. It is one of the dialects of the Somali language.

Unlike many languages, Icelandic has only very minor dialectal differences in sounds. The language has both monophthongs and diphthongs, and many consonants can be voiced or unvoiced.

Debuccalization or deoralization is a sound change or alternation in which an oral consonant loses its original place of articulation and moves it to the glottis. The pronunciation of a consonant as is sometimes called aspiration, but in phonetics, aspiration is the burst of air accompanying a stop. The word comes from Latin bucca, meaning "cheek" or "mouth".

Taos is a Tanoan language spoken by several hundred people in New Mexico, in the United States. The main description of its phonology was contributed by George L. Trager in a (pre-generative) structuralist framework. Earlier considerations of the phonetics-phonology were by John P. Harrington and Jaime de Angulo. Trager's first account was in Trager (1946) based on fieldwork 1935-1937, which was then substantially revised in Trager (1948). The description below takes Trager (1946) as the main point of departure and notes where this differs from the analysis of Trager (1948). Harrington's description is more similar to Trager (1946). Certain comments from a generative perspective are noted in a comparative work Hale (1967).

The most thorough treatment of the Kiowa sound system is by Laurel Watkins in a generative framework. A consideration of prosodic phenomena with acoustic analysis is in Sivertsen (1956). Earlier discussions of phonemics are Trager (1960), Merrifield (1959), Wonderly et al. (1954), and Harrington (1928).

Medumba phonology is the way in which the Medumba language is pronounced. Medumba is a Bamileke language of Cameroon; the people who speak it originate from the Nde division of the West Region of the country. It deals with phonetics, phonotactics and their variation across different dialects of Medumba.

References

  1. 1 2 Garre at Ethnologue (27th ed., 2024) Closed Access logo transparent.svg
  2. Lamberti 1986, p. 25.
  3. Mohamed Haji Mukhtar (2003). Historical Dictionary of Somalia, New Edition. The Scarecrow Press. p. 28. ISBN   0810843447.
  4. 1 2 3 Lamberti 1986, pp. 25–27.
  5. 1 2 Tosco 1989, pp. 7–8.
  6. 1 2 Tosco 1989, p. 6.
  7. Lamberti 1984, p. 182.
  8. 1 2 Tosco 1989, p. 5.
  9. Lewis 1955, p. 27.
  10. 1 2 3 Tosco 1989, pp. 11–12.
  11. Lamberti 1980, p. 5.
  12. Saeed 1982, p. 4.
  13. Lamberti 1983, p. 273.
  14. 1 2 Tosco 1989, pp. 13–14.
  15. Hayward 1984, p. 84.
  16. 1 2 Tosco 1989, p. 17.

References