Dirasha language

Last updated
Dirasha
D'iraassh
Native to Ethiopia
Region Omo Region, in the hills west of Lake Chamo, around Gidole town.
Native speakers
74,000 (2007) [1] [2]
Geʽez (Used in Church)
Latin
Language codes
ISO 639-3 gdl
Glottolog dira1242

Dirasha (also known as Ghidole, Diraasha, Dirayta, Gidole, Gardulla, Dhirasha) is a member of the Cushitic branch of the Afro-Asiatic family. It is spoken in the Omo region of Ethiopia, in the hills west of Lake Chamo, around the town of Gidole.

Contents

A number of speakers also use Oromo or Konso. According to Wondwosen, the "Dirasha" is the name of the people, and the name of the language is given variously as "Dirashitata, Dirayta and Diraytata" (2006:3,4).

None of these names seem to be derogatory, but rather different ways of referring to the same language.

The Diraytata language is spoken by approximately 65,000 people, primarily in the Omo region of Ethiopia.

The language has a three ejective consonant phonemes and two implosive consonant phonemes, fitting the pattern of the Ethiopian Language Area. It has two tones and five vowels. Duration (or gemination) is distinctive for both consonants and vowels (Wondwosen 2006:9,10).

Phonology

Source: [3] [4] [5]

Phonetic Inventory: Consonant IPA Symbols

Dirayta transcription utilizes symbols that differ from those of the traditional IPA chart. Each ejective may be written two ways.

Labial Alveolar Palatal Velar Glottal
Nasal m n ɲ ñ ŋ
Plosive p t c k ʔ
Ejective t’ t' tʃ’ č'č̣ k’ k'
Implosive ɓ ɗ
Fricative f s ʃ š h
Affricate č
Lateral l
Flap r
Glide w j y

When /n/ and /ʔ/ occur as /nʔ/, they contract to form ŋ. /n/ and /ʔ/ must occur in that sequence, with no intervening vowels or consonants.

Phonetic Inventory: Vowel IPA Symbols

Front Back
High i u
Mid e o ɔ
Low a

Low and High Tones

-Dirayta is a 2-tone language.

-Low Tone: Absence of accentual markings

Low Tone: Monosyllabic CVVC words
VowelSample Word: DiraytaSample Word: English Translation
ihiiplocal beer
emeetchild
apaascleaver
uCould not locate example
oCould not locate example
ɔCould not locate example

-High Tone: Represented by acute accent diacritic above vowel (í, é, á, ú, ó, ɔ́)

-Mandatory for monosyllabic CVC and disyllabic CVC/CVVC words

High Tone Accentual Patterns: Monosyllabic CVC Words
VowelSample Word: DiraytaSample Word: English Translation
íCould not locate example
éhénfive
ákápmouth
úCould not locate example
ópóndry season
ɔ́Could not locate example

-For disyllabic words, only one syllable may contain high tone.

-High tone is (mostly) assigned to the first vowel within the initial syllable. However, high tone may be assigned to the first vowel within the ultimate syllable.

High Tone Accentual Patterns: Disyllabic CVC/CVVC Words
VowelSample Word: DiraytaSample Word: English Translation
íšíra

ʃíra

liver
éʔérpalie
éʔéetotevening meal
ésaytétoil
éwaalét long-necked calabash
ápáratyear
ámáakotsnake
úkúnɗafruit
ósóhameat
ómóohotsky-god
óporrótbarley
ɔ́Could not locate example

-For trisyllabic words, high tone is (mostly) assigned to the ultimate syllable. However, high tone may be assigned to BOTH initial and ultimate syllables.

High Tone Accentual Patterns: Trisyllabic CVC/CVVC Words
VowelSample Word: DiraytaSample Word: English Translation
íɗímaʔmaʔrib-cage
émat'aatétround white potato
ákáč̣erracloth
ápalawwáttype of bird
á, áháwalláttype of dumpling
á, ók'áalalót

áalalót

thin ale-gruel
úmút'ura

múṭura

heart
ú, ék'úrt'ummét

úrṭummét

fish
ókópilashield
ó, ák'óhanát

óhanát

afternoon coffee session
ɔ́Could not locate example

Grammar

Pluralization of Nouns

Pluralisation of nouns in Diraytata is a complex process that depends on several factors, such as the gender, number, case, and definiteness of the noun. According to Wondwosen (2006), Diraytata has four genders: masculine, feminine, plural, and neuter. The plural gender is used for nouns that are inherently plural, such as body parts, liquids, and collective nouns. The neuter gender is used for nouns that are not classified as masculine, feminine, or plural. The number system of Diraytata distinguishes between singular, plural, and paucal. The singular is used for one entity, the plural is used for more than one entity, and the paucal is used for a few entities. The case system of Diraytata marks the grammatical function of the noun in the sentence, such as subject, object, or possessor. The definiteness system of Diraytata indicates whether the noun is specific or non-specific, known or unknown, or new or old information.

The pluralisation of nouns in Diraytata is achieved by adding suffixes to the noun stem. The suffixes vary according to the gender, case, and definiteness of the noun. Here are some examples of how nouns are pluralised in Diraytata:

The case and definiteness markers are added after the number suffixes. The case markers are -a for nominative, -i for accusative, -e for genitive, and -o for dative. The definiteness markers are -ta for definite and -ra for indefinite. For example, the noun lúban 'lion' can have the following forms in the plural:

Inflection of Verbs based on the Tense, Aspect, and Mood

The Diraytata language inflects verbs based on tense, aspect, and mood by using a combination of prefixes, suffixes, and tone patterns. According to Wondwosen (2006), Diraytata has three main tenses: past, present, and future. The past tense is marked by a low tone on the verb stem, the present tense is marked by a high tone on the verb stem, and the future tense is marked by a prefix ʔan- and a high tone on the verb stem. For example, the verb ʔáaf 'spread' has the following forms in the three tenses:

The aspect system of Diraytata distinguishes between perfective and imperfective aspects. The perfective aspect indicates that the action is completed or viewed as a whole, while the imperfective aspect indicates that the action is ongoing or viewed as a part. The perfective aspect is marked by a suffix -i for singular subjects and -u for plural subjects. The imperfective aspect is marked by a suffix -a for singular subjects and -o for plural subjects. For example, the verb ʔáaf 'spread' has the following forms in the two aspects:

The mood system of Diraytata expresses the speaker's attitude or modality towards the action. Diraytata has four main moods: indicative, imperative, subjunctive, and conditional. The indicative mood is used for factual or neutral statements, the imperative mood is used for commands or requests, the subjunctive mood is used for wishes or hypothetical situations, and the conditional mood is used for conditional or hypothetical situations. The indicative mood is marked by a suffix -ti for singular subjects and -tu for plural subjects. The imperative mood is marked by a suffix -ta for singular subjects and -to for plural subjects. The subjunctive mood is marked by a suffix -te for singular subjects and -té for plural subjects. The conditional mood is marked by a suffix -tá for singular subjects and -tó for plural subjects. For example, the verb ʔáaf 'spread' has the following forms in the four moods:

singularplural
Indicativeʔáaf-ti'spread'ʔáaf-tu'spread'
Imperativeʔáaf-ta'spread!'ʔáaf-to'spread!'
Subjunctiveʔáaf-te'spread'ʔáaf-té'spread'
Conditionalʔáaf-tá'spread'ʔáaf-tó'spread'

The tense, aspect, and mood markers can be combined to form complex verb forms that express various temporal, aspectual, and modal meanings. For example, the verb ʔáaf 'spread' can have the following complex forms:

Verbs Agreeing with their Subjects' Nouns

Verbs in the Diraytata language agree with their subject nouns in terms of number and person. This means that the verb form changes depending on whether the subject is singular or plural, and whether the subject is first, second, or third person. For example, the verb ʔáaf 'spread' has different forms depending on the subject:

singularplural
1st personʔáaf-ti'I spread'ʔáaf-tu'we spread'
2nd personʔáaf-ta'you spread'ʔáaf-to'you spread'
3rd personʔáaf-te'he/she/it spreads'ʔáaf-té'they spread'

some more verbs and their forms according to the number and person of the subject:

ʔáan
'eat'
ʔáas
'drink'
ʔáab
'sleep'
ʔáat
'walk'
ʔáal
'sing'
1st
person
singularʔáan-ti
'I eat'
ʔáas-ti
'I drink'
ʔáab-ti
'I sleep'
ʔáat-ti
'I walk'
ʔáal-ti
'I sing'
pluralʔáan-tu
'we eat'
ʔáas-tu
'we drink'
ʔáab-tu
'we sleep'
ʔáat-tu
'we walk'
ʔáal-tu
'we sing'
2nd
person
singularʔáan-ta
'you eat'
ʔáas-ta
'you drink'
ʔáab-ta
'you sleep'
ʔáat-ta
'you walk'
ʔáal-ta
'you sing'
pluralʔáan-to
'you eat'
ʔáas-to
'you drink'
ʔáab-to
'you sleep'
ʔáat-to
'you walk'
ʔáal-to
'you sing'
3rd
person
singularʔáan-te
'he/she/it eats'
ʔáas-te
'he/she/it drinks'
ʔáab-te
'he/she/it sleeps'
ʔáat-te
'he/she/it walks'
ʔáal-te
'he/she/it sings'
pluralʔáan-té
'they eat'
ʔáas-té
'they drink'
ʔáab-té
'they sleep'
ʔáat-té
'they walk'
ʔáal-té
'they sing'

The verb suffixes are the same for all verbs, regardless of their meaning or stem. The suffixes indicate the number and person of the subject, and also the mood of the verb. The tense and aspect of the verb are marked by tone and other suffixes.

The subject-verb agreement in Diraytata is similar to the subject-verb agreement in English, which also changes the verb form according to the number and person of the subject. For example, the verb 'spread' has different forms depending on the subject:

However, unlike English, Diraytata does not have a separate pronoun system; instead, it uses verb suffixes to indicate the person and number of the subject. This means that the subject noun is often omitted in Diraytata unless it is needed for clarity or emphasis. For example, depending on the context, the sentence ʔáaf-ti 'I spread' can also mean 'I spread it' or 'I spread them'. The subject noun can be added before the verb if it is necessary to specify the subject or the object. For example, the sentence ʔáaf-ti ʔóokka 'I spread the calf' has both the subject noun 'I' and the object noun 'the calf'.

Adjectives in Diraytata

Adjectives are words that modify or describe nouns. In the Diraytata language, adjectives are a type of modifier that agree with the noun they modify in terms of gender, number, case, and definiteness. According to Wondwosen (2006), Diraytata has four genders: masculine, feminine, plural, and neuter. The number system of Diraytata distinguishes between singular, plural, and paucal. The case system of Diraytata marks the grammatical function of the noun in the sentence, such as subject, object, or possessor. The definiteness system of Diraytata indicates whether the noun is specific or non-specific, known or unknown, or new or old information.

The agreement of adjectives with nouns in Diraytata is achieved by adding suffixes to the adjective stem. The suffixes vary according to the gender, case, and definiteness of the noun. Here are some examples of how adjectives agree with nouns in Diraytata:

The case and definiteness markers are added after the adjective suffixes.

The case markers are -a for nominative, -i for accusative, -e for genitive, and -o for dative. The definiteness markers are -ta for definite and -ra for indefinite. For example, the adjective ʔáan 'big' can have the following forms when modifying a masculine noun:

Adverbs in Diraytata

In the Diraytata language, adverbs are a type of modifier that do not agree with the word they modify, but rather have a fixed form. According to Wondwosen (2006), Diraytata has several types of adverbs, such as:

Independent Subject pronouns

The Diraytata language, also known as Dirasha, has a unique system for indicating the subject of a sentence. Unlike English, Diraytata does not have a separate pronoun system; instead, it uses verb suffixes to indicate the person and number of the subject. This means that the subject noun is often omitted in Diraytata unless it is needed for clarity or emphasis1. For example, depending on the context, the sentence ʔáaf-ti could mean 'I'.

This system is quite different from languages like English, which use independent subject pronouns (I, you, he, she, it, we, they) in addition to verb conjugations. In Diraytata, the information about the subject is incorporated into the verb itself.

Negation of Verbs in Diraytata

Diraytata language uses a negative suffix -n to negate a verb in the present tense. For example, the verb k’ar means ‘to go’, and the negated form is k’ar-n meaning ‘not to go’. In the past tense, the negative suffix -n is attached to the past tense marker -t, resulting in -tn. For example, the verb k’ar-t means ‘went’, and the negated form is k’ar-tn meaning ‘did not go’.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latin grammar</span> Grammar of the Latin language

Latin is a heavily inflected language with largely free word order. Nouns are inflected for number and case; pronouns and adjectives are inflected for number, case, and gender; and verbs are inflected for person, number, tense, aspect, voice, and mood. The inflections are often changes in the ending of a word, but can be more complicated, especially with verbs.

The morphology of Irish is in some respects typical of an Indo-European language. Nouns are declined for number and case, and verbs for person and number. Nouns are classified by masculine or feminine gender. Other aspects of Irish morphology, while typical for an Insular Celtic language, are not typical for Indo-European, such as the presence of inflected prepositions and the initial consonant mutations. Irish syntax is also rather different from that of most Indo-European languages, due to its use of the verb–subject–object word order.

Russian grammar employs an Indo-European inflexional structure, with considerable adaptation.

Lithuanian grammar retains many archaic features from Proto-Balto-Slavic that have been lost in other Balto-Slavic languages.

Standard Romanian shares largely the same grammar and most of the vocabulary and phonological processes with the other three surviving varieties of Eastern Romance, namely Aromanian, Megleno-Romanian, and Istro-Romanian.

Swedish is descended from Old Norse. Compared to its progenitor, Swedish grammar is much less characterized by inflection. Modern Swedish has two genders and no longer conjugates verbs based on person or number. Its nouns have lost the morphological distinction between nominative and accusative cases that denoted grammatical subject and object in Old Norse in favor of marking by word order. Swedish uses some inflection with nouns, adjectives, and verbs. It is generally a subject–verb–object (SVO) language with V2 word order.

Much of Tamil grammar is extensively described in the oldest available grammar book for Tamil, the Tolkāppiyam. Modern Tamil writing is largely based on the 13th century grammar Naṉṉūl, which restated and clarified the rules of the Tolkāppiyam with some modifications.

Yiddish grammar is the system of principles which govern the structure of the Yiddish language. This article describes the standard form laid out by YIVO while noting differences in significant dialects such as that of many contemporary Hasidim. As a Germanic language descended from Middle High German, Yiddish grammar is fairly similar to that of German, though it also has numerous linguistic innovations as well as grammatical features influenced by or borrowed from Hebrew, Aramaic, and various Slavic languages.

The grammar of Old English differs greatly from Modern English, predominantly being much more inflected. As a Germanic language, Old English has a morphological system similar to that of the Proto-Germanic reconstruction, retaining many of the inflections thought to have been common in Proto-Indo-European and also including constructions characteristic of the Germanic daughter languages such as the umlaut.

The grammar of the Polish language is complex and characterized by a high degree of inflection, and has relatively free word order, although the dominant arrangement is subject–verb–object (SVO). There commonly are no articles, and there is frequent dropping of subject pronouns. Distinctive features include the different treatment of masculine personal nouns in the plural, and the complex grammar of numerals and quantifiers.

ʾIʿrāb is an Arabic term for the system of nominal, adjectival, or verbal suffixes of Classical Arabic to mark grammatical case. These suffixes are written in fully vocalized Arabic texts, notably the Qur’ān or texts written for children or Arabic learners, and they are articulated when a text is formally read aloud, but they do not survive in any spoken dialect of Arabic. Even in Literary Arabic, these suffixes are often not pronounced in pausa ; i.e. when the word occurs at the end of the sentence, in accordance with certain rules of Arabic pronunciation. Depending on the knowledge of ʾiʿrāb, some Arabic speakers may omit case endings when reading out in Modern Standard Arabic, thus making it similar to spoken dialects. Many Arabic textbooks for foreigners teach Arabic without a heavy focus on ʾiʿrāb, either omitting the endings altogether or only giving a small introduction. Arabic without case endings may require a different and fixed word order, similar to spoken Arabic dialects.

Icelandic grammar is the set of structural rules that describe the use of the Icelandic language.

Standard Kannada grammar is primarily based on Keshiraja's Shabdamanidarpana which provides the fullest systematic exposition of Kannada language. The earlier grammatical works include portions of Kavirajamarga of 9th century, Kavyavalokana and Karnatakabhashabhushana both authored by Nagavarma II in first half of the 12th century.

Old Church Slavonic is an inflectional language with moderately complex verbal and nominal systems.

Old Norse has three categories of verbs and two categories of nouns. Conjugation and declension are carried out by a mix of inflection and two nonconcatenative morphological processes: umlaut, a backness-based alteration to the root vowel; and ablaut, a replacement of the root vowel, in verbs.

Zotung (Zobya) is a language spoken by the Zotung people, in Rezua Township, Chin State, Burma. It is a continuum of closely related dialects and accents. The language does not have a standard written form since it has dialects with multiple variations on its pronunciations. Instead, Zotung speakers use a widely accepted alphabet for writing with which they spell using their respective dialect. However, formal documents are written using the Lungngo dialect because it was the tongue of the first person to prescribe a standard writing, Sir Siabawi Khuamin.

The morphology of the Polish language is characterised by a fairly regular system of inflection as well as word formation. Certain regular or common alternations apply across the Polish morphological system, affecting word formation and inflection of various parts of speech. These are described below, mostly with reference to the orthographic rather than the phonological system for clarity.

This article concerns the morphology of the Albanian language, including the declension of nouns and adjectives, and the conjugation of verbs. It refers to the Tosk-based Albanian standard regulated by the Academy of Sciences of Albania.

The grammar of Old Saxon is highly inflected, similar to that of Old English or Latin. As an ancient Germanic language, the morphological system of Old Saxon is similar to that of the hypothetical Proto-Germanic reconstruction, retaining many of the inflections thought to have been common in Proto-Indo-European and also including characteristically Germanic constructions such as the umlaut. Among living languages, Old Saxon morphology most closely resembles that of modern High German.

This article describes the grammar of the Old Irish language. The grammar of the language has been described with exhaustive detail by various authors, including Thurneysen, Binchy and Bergin, McCone, O'Connell, Stifter, among many others.

References

  1. Ethiopia 2007 Census
  2. Dirasha at Ethnologue (27th ed., 2024) Closed Access logo transparent.svg
  3. Abire, W.T. (2006). "Aspects of Diraytata: Morphology and Syntax" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-12-21. Retrieved 2018-12-21.
  4. Wedekind, K. (2002). "Sociolinguistic Survey Report of the Languages of the Gawwada (Dullay), Diraasha (Gidole), Muusiye (Bussa) Areas". SIL (Société International de Linguistique).
  5. Hayward, R. J. (February 1981). "Nominal suffixes in Dirayta (Gidole)". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 44 (1): 126–144. doi:10.1017/s0041977x00104446. ISSN   0041-977X. S2CID   162445184.