Healthcare in Chile

Last updated

El nino enfermo, The sick child, painted by the Chilean painter Pedro Lira. LirapedroElninoenfermo.jpg
El niño enfermo, The sick child, painted by the Chilean painter Pedro Lira.

The healthcare system in Chile operates as a mixed system, combining both public and private provision of health services. The public system, known as Fondo Nacional de Salud (FONASA), is funded through taxes and provides free or subsidized care to those who cannot afford private health insurance. The private system consists of various insurance providers, called Instituciones de Salud Previsional (ISAPREs), and private healthcare facilities, which offer more extensive services to those who can afford to pay.

Contents

History

Life expectancy development since 1900. Life expectancy in Chile.svg
Life expectancy development since 1900.

Chile was among the first Latin American countries to introduce a healthcare system for the middle class, funded through mandatory salary deductions, similar to the Bismarckian welfare model. In the 1950s, the country established a national healthcare system. However, during the final decade of the military dictatorship (1973–1990), a two-tier system emerged, allowing individuals to opt out of the public system and purchase private health insurance from ISAPREs. These private insurers provided access to private clinics and hospitals, often at significantly higher costs. [1] The public healthcare sector was maintained under FONASA.

Following the return to civilian rule in 1990, public funding for hospitals increased, but no major reforms were implemented for over a decade. In the early 2000s, President Ricardo Lagos introduced reforms to strengthen the public sector. By 2015, private healthcare coverage had declined to 19% of the population, down from a peak of 26%. A significant reform during this period was the introduction of the Explicit Guarantee System (Acceso Universal con Garantías Explícitas, or AUGE), which guarantees access, opportunity, quality, and financial coverage for 80 high-mortality conditions. While the AUGE system helped reduce mortality rates for communicable diseases and myocardial infarction, it did so at the expense of chronic disease management.[ citation needed ] In 2010, the Constitutional Court of Chile ruled that ISAPREs' premium adjustments based on age and gender were discriminatory, though no alternative mechanism was proposed. Public satisfaction with the healthcare system has declined since 2007, reaching its lowest point in 2014. [1]

Structure of the healthcare system

All workers and pensioners in Chile are required to contribute 7% of their income toward health insurance, except for the poorest pensioners, who are exempt. Those who do not join an ISAPRE are covered by FONASA. FONASA also covers individuals receiving unemployment benefits, uninsured pregnant women, dependents of insured workers, people with disabilities, and those classified as poor or indigent. [2]

FONASA beneficiaries can access both public and private healthcare facilities, provided the private facility or professional is affiliated with FONASA at one of three pricing levels. Since September 1, 2022, public healthcare services have been free for all FONASA beneficiaries. [3]

ISAPREs offer varying levels of coverage based on income and medical risk, which is assessed using factors such as age, family medical history, and sex. However, in 2010, the Constitutional Court ruled that risk assessment based on sex and age was unconstitutional. [4] ISAPRE participants pay an average of 9.2% of their income toward health insurance, with the additional 2.2% being voluntary to enhance benefits. Nearly 60% of ISAPRE participants are in the top two income quintiles, while only 7% are in the bottom quintile. ISAPREs often provide shorter wait times and discounted services through provider networks, whereas FONASA relies on lower-cost public hospitals, offering broader benefits but with longer wait times. [5]

Over 50% of the public healthcare budget is funded through taxation, which supports FONASA and the public social security system. ISAPREs, on the other hand, rely solely on member contributions to cover expenses.

AUGE plan

The AUGE plan (also known as GES, or Garantías Explícitas en Salud) guarantees access, opportunity, quality, and financial coverage for 80 high-mortality conditions. [6] The guarantees include: [5]

  1. Access: Patients can receive care from a network of providers near their residence.
  2. Opportunity: Care must be provided within pre-established time limits for both initial consultation and follow-up.
  3. Quality: Services must meet technical standards based on medical evidence (enforceable from July 1, 2013). [7]
  4. Financial Coverage: Copayments cannot exceed 20% of the treatment cost, with an annual cap of one month's family income.

Healthcare resources

As of December 22, 2014, Chile had 425 hospitals, [8] administered by either the Regional Ministry of Health (SEREMI) or the National Health Care System. SEREMI oversees 54% (230) of hospitals, while the National Health Care System manages the remaining 46% (195). [9] Approximately 30% (127 hospitals) are located in Santiago, the capital and most populous region, which accounts for 36% of the country's population.

Beneficiaries

As of 2017, the distribution of healthcare beneficiaries in Chile was as follows: [10] [11] [12]

SystemAffiliates %
Fonasa 13,926,47575.61
Isapre 3,393,80518.43
Total pop.18,419,192100.00

See also

Related Research Articles

Health care reform is for the most part governmental policy that affects health care delivery in a given place. Health care reform typically attempts to:

Medicare is a federal health insurance program in the United States for people age 65 or older and younger people with disabilities, including those with end stage renal disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. It started in 1965 under the Social Security Administration and is now administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Publicly funded health care</span> Form of health care financing

Publicly funded healthcare is a form of health care financing designed to meet the cost of all or most healthcare needs from a publicly managed fund. Usually this is under some form of democratic accountability, the right of access to which are set down in rules applying to the whole population contributing to the fund or receiving benefits from it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States</span> Healthcare system comparison

A comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States is often made by government, public health and public policy analysts. The two countries had similar healthcare systems before Canada changed its system in the 1960s and 1970s. The United States spends much more money on healthcare than Canada, on both a per-capita basis and as a percentage of GDP. In 2006, per-capita spending for health care in Canada was US$3,678; in the U.S., US$6,714. The U.S. spent 15.3% of GDP on healthcare in that year; Canada spent 10.0%. In 2006, 70% of healthcare spending in Canada was financed by government, versus 46% in the United States. Total government spending per capita in the U.S. on healthcare was 23% higher than Canadian government spending. U.S. government expenditure on healthcare was just under 83% of total Canadian spending.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-tier healthcare</span> Unequal access to higher quality healthcare

Two-tier healthcare is a situation in which a basic government-provided healthcare system provides basic care, and a secondary tier of care exists for those who can pay for additional, better quality or faster access. Most countries have both publicly and privately funded healthcare, but the degree to which it creates a quality differential depends on the way the two systems are managed, funded, and regulated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Mexico</span>

Healthcare in Mexico is a multifaceted system comprising public institutions overseen by government departments, private hospitals and clinics, and private physicians. It is distinguished by a unique amalgamation of coverage predominantly contingent upon individuals' employment statuses. Rooted in the Mexican constitution's principles, every Mexican citizen is entitled to cost-free access to healthcare and medication. This constitutional mandate was translated into reality through the auspices of the Instituto de Salud para el Bienestar, abbreviated as INSABI; however, INSABI was discontinued in 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care in Argentina</span>

Argentina's health care system is composed of a universal health care system and a private system. The government maintains a system of public medical facilities that are universally accessible to everyone in the country, but formal sector workers are also obligated to participate in one of about 300 labor union-run health insurance schemes, which offer differing levels of coverage. Private medical facilities and health insurance also exist in the country. The Ministry of Health (MSAL), oversees all three subsectors of the health care system and is responsible for setting of regulation, evaluation and collecting statistics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care in Colombia</span>

Health care in Colombia refers to the prevention, treatment, and management of illness and the preservation of mental and physical well-being through the services offered by the medical, nursing, and allied health professions in the Republic of Colombia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Germany</span>

Germany has a universal multi-payer health care system paid for by a combination of statutory health insurance and private health insurance.

Healthcare in Georgia is provided by a universal health care system under which the state funds medical treatment in a mainly privatized system of medical facilities. In 2013, the enactment of a universal health care program triggered universal coverage of government-sponsored medical care of the population and improving access to health care services. Responsibility for purchasing publicly financed health services lies with the Social Service Agency (SSA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Tanzania</span>

Tanzania has a hierarchical health system which is in tandem with the political-administrative hierarchy. At the bottom, there are the dispensaries found in every village where the village leaders have a direct influence on its running. The health centers are found at ward level and the health center in charge is answerable to the ward leaders. At the district, there is a district hospital and at the regional level a regional referral hospital. The tertiary level is usually the zone hospitals and at a national level, there is the national hospital. There are also some specialized hospitals that do not fit directly into this hierarchy and therefore are directly linked to the ministry of health.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Costa Rica</span>

Costa Rica provides universal health care to its citizens and permanent residents. Both the private and public health care systems in Costa Rica are continually being upgraded. Statistics from the World Health Organization (WHO) frequently place Costa Rica in the top country rankings in the world for long life expectancy. WHO's 2000 survey ranked Costa Rica as having the 36th best health care system, placing it one spot above the United States at the time. In addition, the UN has ranked Costa Rica's public health system within the top 20 worldwide and the number 1 in Latin America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in the United States</span>

In the United States, healthcare is largely provided by private sector healthcare facilities, and paid for by a combination of public programs, private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. The U.S. is the only developed country without a system of universal healthcare, and a significant proportion of its population lacks health insurance. The United States spends more on healthcare than any other country, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of GDP; however, this expenditure does not necessarily translate into better overall health outcomes compared to other developed nations. Coverage varies widely across the population, with certain groups, such as the elderly and low-income individuals, receiving more comprehensive care through government programs such as Medicaid and Medicare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fondo Nacional de Salud</span> Funding branch of the Chilean Ministry of Health

Fondo Nacional de Salud, also known as FONASA, is the financial entity entrusted to collect, manage and distribute state funds for health in Chile. It is funded by the public. It was created in 1979 by Decree Law No. 2763.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spanish National Health System</span> Spanish Public Healthcare System

The Spanish National Health System is the agglomeration of public healthcare services that has existed in Spain since it was established through and structured by the Ley General de Sanidad of 1986. Management of these services has been progressively transferred to the distinct autonomous communities of Spain, while some continue to be operated by the National Institute of Health Management, part of the Ministry of Health and Social Policy. The activity of these services is harmonized by the Interterritorial Council of the Spanish National Health Service in order to give cohesion to the system and to guarantee the rights of citizens throughout Spain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care systems by country</span>

Examples of health care systems of the world, sorted by continent, are as follows.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Luxembourg</span>

Healthcare in Luxembourg is based on three fundamental principles: compulsory health insurance, free choice of healthcare provider for patients and compulsory compliance of providers in the set fixed costs for the services rendered. Citizens are covered by a healthcare system that provides medical, maternity and illness benefits and, for the elderly, attendance benefits. The extent of the coverage varies depending on the occupation of the individual. Those employed or receiving social security have full insurance coverage, and the self-employed and tradesmen are provided with both medical benefits and attendance benefits. That is all funded by taxes on citizens' incomes, payrolls and wages. However, the government covers the funding for maternity benefits as well as any other sector that needs additional funding. About 75% of the population purchases a complementary healthcare plan. About 99% of the people are covered under the state healthcare system.

Government-guaranteed health care for all citizens of a country, often called universal health care, is a broad concept that has been implemented in several ways. The common denominator for all such programs is some form of government action aimed at broadly extending access to health care and setting minimum standards. Most implement universal health care through legislation, regulation, and taxation. Legislation and regulation direct what care must be provided, to whom, and on what basis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Peru</span>

Peru has a decentralized healthcare system that consists of a combination of governmental and non-governmental coverage. Five sectors administer healthcare in Peru today: the Ministry of Health, EsSalud, and the Armed Forces (FFAA), National Police (PNP), and the private sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Belize</span>

Healthcare in Belize is provided through both public and private healthcare systems. The Ministry of Health (MoH) is the government agency responsible for overseeing the entire health sector and is also the largest provider of public health services in Belize. The MoH offers affordable care to a majority of Belizeans with a strong focus on providing quality healthcare through a range of public programs and institutions.

References

  1. 1 2 Thomas J. Bossert, Ph.D., and Thomas Leisewitz. Innovation and Change in the Chilean Health System. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1-5. January 7, 2016, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1514202, retrieved January 7, 2016
  2. "Conoce Fonasa". Archived from the original on 2022-10-24. Retrieved 2022-10-24.
  3. Copago Cero: La salud pública ya es gratuita para las personas que pertenecen a FONASA
  4. "TC limitó uso de tablas de riesgo de isapres". Cooperativa.cl. 2010-07-27. Archived from the original on 2014-05-22. Retrieved 2011-12-29.
  5. 1 2 "The Changing Regulatory Environment of Healthcare in Chile" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-04-02. Retrieved 2011-12-29.
  6. "Garantías Explícitas en Salud (AUGE-GES) - ChileAtiende - Personas a tu servicio". Chileclic.gob.cl. Retrieved 2012-05-31.
  7. "Hospitales y clínicas deberán estar acreditados para atender a pacientes con patologías Auge - Superintendencia de Salud - Gobierno de Chile". Archived from the original on 2015-04-28. Retrieved 2013-02-21.
  8. Global Health Intelligence, "Global Health Intelligence" Archived 2017-01-27 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved 16 January 2015.
  9. Health Statistics and Information Department (DEIS: Departamento de estadistica e informacion de salud - Listado de Establecimiento y Estrategias de salud), "DEIS". Retrieved 22 December 2014.
  10. "Boletín Estadístico 2016-2017". Fondo Nacional de Salud . Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  11. "Boletín Estadístico Año 2017". Superintendencia de Salud de Chile. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  12. "Estimaciones y proyecciones de la población de Chile 1992-2050". Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas de Chile . Retrieved 2019-03-14.