Kondor E 3

Last updated
E 3
Role Fighter aircraft
National origin Germany
ManufacturerKondor Flugzeugwerke, Essen
DesignerWalter Rethel
First flightAugust or September 1918
Number builtc. 10

The Kondor E 3, sometimes erroneously known as E.III, was a German single seat, monoplane fighter aircraft designed and built close to the end of World War I. Though successful in the third D-type fighter competition at Aldershof in September 1918, only a few were produced, given the Idflieg designation of Kondor D.I .

Contents

Design and development

The success of the parasol winged Fokker D.VIII in 1918 led several German aircraft makers to follow suit. The E 3 being Kondor's interpretation of the single-seat cantilever parasol monoplane fighter (E for Eindekker in this company designation), though it was later given the service designation D.I. [1]

The E 3 had a cantilever wing with a section which was centrally thick but thinned towards the wing tips. The wing was straight tapered in plan, with an unswept leading edge, forward sweep on the trailing edge and blunt tips. This was constructed in a novel and patented way, the wing ribs protruding and the gap between them covered with strips of veneer attached by L-shaped strips. The result was a very strong structure; Kondor claimed that the slight though clearly visible rib protrusion also improved the aerodynamics. Wing and fuselage were connected on each side by two struts, one above the other, running from the mid- and upper forward fuselage to a common junction at the wing leading edge together with three forward-leaning struts from the fuselage close to the cockpit to the wing underside. [1]

There were two E 3 variants, differing chiefly in their engines. The original E 3 had a 108 kW (145 hp) Oberursel Ur.III eleven-cylinder rotary engine and the E 3a a 149 kW (200 hp) Goebel Goe III nine-cylinder rotary. The Oberursel had a cutaway, horseshoe-type cowling, the Goebel a complete, circular one. Behind the engine, the fuselage was flat-sided, with the single open cockpit under a large cut-out in the wing's trailing edge for enhanced visibility, tapering to the tail under shallow, rounded decking. Both rudder and elevators were balanced; the rudder reached down to the keel and moved within a cut-out between the elevators as the tailplane was placed on top of the fuselage. The E 3 had a fixed, conventional undercarriage, the mainwheels on a single axle with V-strut legs to the lower fuselage and cross-wire braced. [1]

Though the design process only began in July 1918, the aircraft was rapidly built and made its first flight before going to Adlershof for type testing in September and entering the Third D-type contest against some other new German fighters the following month. [1] These included the Albatros D.XII and the Aviatik D.VII, both biplanes. [2] One senior pilot there reckoned the Kondor the best machine present; it was judged as having flight characteristics only marginally less good than the recently ordered Siemens-Schuckert D.IV biplane and showed none of the high-speed parasol wing vibrations experienced with the Fokker D.VIII. [1]

The higher powered E 3a probably flew for the first in October. It had a top speed of 200 km/h (120 mph; 110 kn) and a much improved rate of climb, reaching 5,000 m (16,000 ft) in 11 minutes. [1]

Confusion has reigned over the Kondor fighter designations, caused by the Idflieg during the second D-type fighter competition at Aldershof, when the two Kondor D 2 prototypes were referred to as D.I and D.II, which were unofficial and fictitious. Standard Kondor practice was a Letter followed by an Arabic numeral separated by a space. This confusion was exacerbated when the production E 3 aircraft were given the official Idflieg designation Kondor D.I. [1]

Operational history

After the competition, Kondor received an order for the E 3; the numbers required are uncertain but seem to have been about 100. However, the November Armistice came with only a few, about 8–10, having been delivered. [1]

A few E 3s were operated after the war. One E 3a was bought by the Swiss Comte Mittelholzer for aerobatic displays. [1] Two others went to an anti-communist Dutch vigilante group, along with the E 3's designer, Walter Rethel. On arrival he produced a reconnaissance aircraft, the NAVO RK-P4/220, for the group. [3]

Variants

Kondor E 3
Company designation for the prototype and production aircraft, powered by 108 kW (145 hp) Oberursel Ur.III engines.
Kondor E 3a
A single prototype powered by a 149 kW (200 hp) Goebel Goe III engine.
Kondor D.I
The official Idflieg designation of the production E 3 aircraft, (the ONLY official use of a Roman numeral D-type designation for Kondor aircraft).

Specifications (E 3)

Data from The Complete Book of Fighters [1]

General characteristics

Performance

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fokker Dr.I</span> WWI fighter aircraft

The Fokker Dr.I, often known simply as the Fokker Triplane, was a World War I fighter aircraft built by Fokker-Flugzeugwerke. The Dr.I saw widespread service in the spring of 1918. It became famous as the aircraft in which Manfred von Richthofen gained his last 17 victories, and in which he was killed on 21 April 1918.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fokker D.VIII</span> German fighter aircraft

The Fokker E.V was a German parasol-monoplane fighter aircraft designed by Reinhold Platz and built by Fokker-Flugzeugwerke. The E.V was the last Fokker design to become operational with the Luftstreitkräfte, entering service in the last months of World War I. After several fatal accidents due to wing failures, the aircraft was modified and redesignated Fokker D.VIII. Dubbed the Flying Razor by post-war pulp-fiction writers, the D.VIII had the distinction of scoring the last aerial victory of the war.

The Alter A.1 was a single-seat biplane fighter aircraft first flown in February 1917. Built by Ludwig Alter-Werke of Darmstadt to a design by Kallweit and Ketterer, the A.1 was very similar in concept to the Nieuport 11, but not an exact copy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pfalz D.VIII</span> Type of aircraft

The Pfalz D.VIII was a German World War I fighter aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fokker D.VI</span> Type of aircraft

The Fokker D.VI was a German fighter aircraft built in limited numbers at the end of World War I. The D.VI served in the German and Austro-Hungarian air services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fokker D.III</span> Type of aircraft

The Fokker D.III was a German single-seat fighter aircraft of World War I. It saw limited frontline service before being withdrawn from combat in December 1916.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rumpler D.I</span> Type of aircraft

The Rumpler D.I was a fighter-reconnaissance aircraft produced in Germany at the end of World War I. It was a conventional single-bay biplane with wings of unequal span braced by I-struts. It featured an open cockpit and a fixed, tailskid undercarriage. The upper wing was fitted with aerodynamically balanced ailerons and fuselage had an oval cross-section.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fokker D.IX</span> Type of aircraft

The Fokker D.IX was a Dutch single seat, single engine fighter aircraft, the final, more powerful evolution of the Fokker D.VII World War I success, flown in 1921. The sole example was purchased by the US Army Air Service but not developed further.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siemens-Schuckert D.VI</span> Type of aircraft

The Siemens-Schuckert D.VI was a single engine, single seat, parasol wing German fighter aircraft flown in 1919.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NVI F.K.32</span> Dutch trainer aircraft prototype

The NVI F.K.32 was a tandem two-seat biplane training aircraft designed and built in the Netherlands in the mid-1920s. It did not go into service.

The NAVO RK-4/220 was a Dutch aircraft originally designed for unofficial crowd observation but which was completed as an airliner. Only one was built; it flew, but was never certified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kondor D 7</span> Type of aircraft

The Kondor D 7 was a prototype German single seat biplane fighter built over the winter of 1917-18. It was not a success and its development was soon abandoned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kondor D 6</span> Type of aircraft

The Kondor D 6 was a prototype German biplane fighter aircraft flown in 1918. In the interests of better upward vision for the pilot, its upper wing was in two halves, separated over the central fuselage. Its development was soon abandoned.

The Pfalz D.VII was a German biplane fighter aircraft from World War I. It was not put into production.

The Pfalz D.VI was a German sesquiplane fighter aircraft from World War I. It was not put into production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LFG Roland D.VII</span> 1910s German fighter aircraft prototype

The Luft-Fahrzeug-Gesellschaft (LFG) Roland D.VII was a German single seat, single engine biplane fighter aircraft built during World War I. Problems with its underdeveloped V-8 engine prevented its production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LFG Roland D.IX</span> 1910s German fighter aircraft prototype

The LFG Roland D.IX was a World War I German single seat fighter aircraft, a biplane powered by one of a new generation of powerful rotary engines. Three slightly different prototypes were built but there was no series production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LFG Roland D.XVI</span> 1910s German fighter aircraft

The LFG Roland D.XVI, initially designated the LFG Roland E.I, was a single-seat, single-engine, parasol wing German fighter aircraft flown close to the end of World War I. Only two were built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kondor D 1</span> WWI German fighter aircraft

The Kondor D 1, given the unofficial name Kondorlaus, was a German single seat, biplane fighter aircraft designed and built close to the end of WWI.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kondor D 2</span> WWI German fighter aircraft

The Kondor D 2 was a German single seat, biplane fighter aircraft designed and built close to the end of World War I.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Green & Swanborough, p. 323
  2. Green & Swanborough, pp. 16, 41
  3. Wesselink & Postma, p. 31

Bibliography