Melolontha hippocastani

Melolontha hippocastani
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Arthropoda
Class:	Insecta
Order:	Coleoptera
Family:	Scarabaeidae
Genus:	Melolontha
Species:	M. hippocastani
Binomial name
	Melolontha hippocastani; Fabricius, 1801

Last updated June 29, 2024

Melolontha hippocastani, the northern cockchafer,^[1] is a species of scarab beetle native to Eurasia, with its range spanning from Western Europe to the Pacific coast of China. It is one of several species in the genus Melolontha known as cockchafers, alongside the common cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) and Melolontha pectoralis,^[2] but generally at more northern latitudes, or at higher altitudes in upland woods further south.^[1] The adults are around 20–29 mm in length. It is distinguished from Melolontha melolontha by the shape of its pygidium, which is primarily black in colour. It primarily dwells in forests, and as such is also known as the forest cockchafer. The mate-finding behaviour in M. hippocastani is facilitated by plant volatiles and sex pheromones. Mating activities primarily takes place during the evening flight periods.^[3] Females lay their eggs in soil, and the larvae feed on decaying organic matter and later small plant roots, including the roots of young trees like pines and firs. The larvae usually develop between 3 and 5 years. They emerge between late April and the end of June.^[4] Like other cockchafers, they have been considered a serious pest of crops and trees.^[1]

Geographic range

Melolontha hippocastani primarily resides in forest ecosystems in northern Eurasia. Its distribution range spans across most of Europe, excluding the northernmost and southernmost regions. This species extends its habitat into Mongolia, parts of Central Asia, and Siberia. Unlike its counterpart, the common cockchafer, which occupies diverse environments including forested and open areas, M. hippocastani is primarily a forest species, often in taiga forest.^[1]^[2]

Genetics

Research has probed the genetic diversity in M. hippocastani. Researchers analysed microsatellite loci in over 200 individuals from three primary outbreak areas in Poland, and found significant genetic diversity within subpopulations. This research compared the genetic makeup of M. hippocastani to a different cockchafer beetle, the Melolontha melolontha. They demonstrated that both M. hippocastani and M. melolontha show considerable genetic diversity within subpopulations within sampling sites with minor effects of past bottlenecks possibly masked by current population sizes, which genetic similarities between the species. The estimates of effective population sizes indicated a large number of individuals contributing to further generations of the population, indicating a limited impact of forest management practices on M. hippocastani and M. melolontha alike. However, while genetic differentiation was observed in M. melolontha populations, M. hippocastani populations were genetically similar across populations suggesting a possible historical divergence between the two species. Further research is required to understand M. hippocastani genetic population structure.^[2]

Mating behaviour

Mate searching

Mating behaviour primarily occurs during flight periods at dusk, during which beetles hover around tree tops. During this time, females and males mate several times, and mating lasts for several hours. Then the females oviposit in the soil, which causes severe tree damage from their feeding on tree roots.^[3] The swarming flights are mainly performed by males, while females stay in their host trees and continue feeding. Males are subsequently drawn towards damage-induced green leaf volatiles ^{[ disambiguation needed ]} allowing location of mechanically damaged foliage, which allows males to locate females based on the leaves they have eaten. In order to distinguish between nonspecific leaf damage and damage caused by feeding females, male cockchafers orientate by a sex attractant. Research has investigated the role of sex pheromones of the scarab beetle on mating behaviour.

Volatiles and sexual dimorphism

One study demonstrates that male M. hippocastani are attracted to volatiles emitted by damaged leaves and conspecific females. Although both male and female beetles showed a physiological response to these volatiles, only males exhibited behavioural responses, suggesting that the volatile response reflects a mate-finding strategy rather than a search for feeding resources.^[3]

A variety of compounds have been analysed in research to identify which compound serves as a sex pheromone in M. hippocastani, and the mechanism by which it takes action. One research study determined that mate-finding behaviour in M. hippocastani is driven by males locating females using olfactory cues such as green leaf volatiles and 1,4-benzoquinone, along with the species' sexual dimorphism. Both males and females contain 1,4-benzoquinone; however studies showed that female extracts provoked a higher number of landings than male extracts. This finding led to further analysis on the quantities of 1,4-benzoquinone in each sex, which were found to be higher in females, suggesting its role in attracting males. This compound, known for its defense ^{[ disambiguation needed ]} function in arthropods, is hypothesised to have evolved into a sex pheromone in M. hippocastani. Thus, research suggests a dual function of benzoquinones as both mate attractants and defense compounds. Further research is exploring other compounds' roles to develop semiochemical-based methods for controlling M. hippocastani populations.^[5]

The role of (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol

Additional research investigated whether volatiles from freshly damaged leaves are more attractive to males than those from older damaged leaves. Analysis of volatiles from freshly damaged leaves revealed typical leaf aldehydes, while older damaged leaves predominantly emitted (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol and (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate.^[6] Surprisingly, males were equally attracted to volatiles from both fresh and old damaged leaves, with a preference for the latter in synthetic mixture experiments. Further experiments identified (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol as highly attractive to male beetles, while other tested compounds were behaviourally inactive.^[6] However, all tested compounds elicited comparable electrophysiological responses on male antennae. Thus, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol plays a vital role in the sexual communication of M. hippocastani, attracting both sexes of an insect.^[6]

Thus, a combination of plant volatiles and sex pheromones allow for males to find feeding females in the trees, facilitating mating behaviour.

Physiology

The mate finding technique performed by these beetles using sex pheromones are performed using specific physiologies. Melolonthinae sex pheromone glands are everted from the abdominal tip.^[3]M. hippocastani show sexual dimorphism within the antenna. Male antennae consist of seven large lamellae, while female clubs have only six smaller lamellae, which suggests different olfactory abilities between sexes and the presence of a female derived sex pheromone.^[3] Pheromone-degrading enzymes are present in the antennae of M. hippocastani and show considerable substrate specificity.^[7]

Life cycle

Once adult female M. hippocastani lay their eggs in the soil, the larvae spend 36 months underground feeding on plant roots.^[4] During this time, their growth phase is divided into three distinct phases. They pupate in summer, the year before swarming, and spend their last winter as adults.^[4] The following year, in late April to early May, the adult insects emerge from the soil and feed on tree foliage. About 2 weeks after emergence, oviposition flights are observed. Females land on the ground at dusk and burrow into the soil to lay eggs in clusters. The females prefer sandy soils because they facilitate the females' digging, allow for larval movement, and allow volatile compounds from host to spread, facilitating the larval orientation and survival in the soil. Females lay an average of 24 eggs during their first egg-laying phase and 15 during their second egg-laying phase.^[4]

Microbiome

Diet and digestion in M. hippocastani are facilitated by microbial symbionts residing in their guts. M. hippocastani larvae guts consist of two large compartments-- a tubular midgut and an enlarged hindgut. The midgut releases hydrolytic enzymes into an alkaline and oxidative environment, which threaten the development of bacterial species. The hindgut is an expanded organ specialised for anaerobic fermentation. Both regions have diverse bacterial communities, which are responsible for gut pH modification, the detoxification of plant allelochemicals and the maintenance of the microbial community structure.^[8]

Specifically, these microbes play a crucial role in breaking down woody food components such as lignocelluloses and xylans. When comparing the larvae and adult microbiotes of M. hippocastani, the larvae microbiotes had harsher conditions, yet harboured a richer and more diverse bacterial community compared to adult guts. A core group of bacterial phylotypes was shared between larvae and adults, indicating some degree of stability despite different feeding habits. Little overlap was observed between bacterial species from food or soil contamination and those in the gut, suggesting minimal alteration of bacterial diversity upon ingestion. Some isolates from larvae exhibited enzymatic properties related to digestion. This symbiotic relationship underscores the importance of microbes in the digestive processes across organisms.^[8]

Further research on the reactions of M. hippocastani to high manganese (Mn) content in their diet revealed significant effects on their activity and fertility. As the Mn content in their food increased, the activity of adult cockchafers decreased, and females fed on high Mn diets showed zero fertility. Despite the cockchafers' ability for self-detoxification, the presence of Mn in their diet still influenced their activity. It was found that expelling Mn through the digestive system serves as the primary mechanism for the cockchafers' self-detoxification process, showing the relationship between diet, digestion, and physiological responses in M. hippocastani.^[9]

Interactions with humans

The parasitic nature of these beetles has caused damage on a wide variety of foliage, which has demanded an abundance of research for strategies to understand M. hippocastani in order to mitigate their harmful impacts and protect the forests in which these beetles are local. For example, in parts of southern Germany, specifically in the states of Hessen, Rheinland-Pfalz, and Baden-Württemberg, mass breeding of M. hippocastani has been observed every 30–40 years, which causes damage from adults feeding on the foliage between April and May.^[10] However, this damage can be compensated during a secondary sprouting period in June. Contrarily, grubs that develop within 3–4 years in the forest soil cause severe, long-term damage on young trees by feeding on roots.^[3] In northeastern France, specifically in the Vosges Mountains, M. hippocastani populations have been at epidemic levels since 2007, and high larval densities have been recorded, which induces a high mortality risk for forest plantations. Thus, these beetles can cause vast economic and ecological losses in oak-dominated forest.^[10] Extensive research continues to be performed on management of these pests. Specifically, research has shown that forests with a dense shrub layer have a negative effect on the density of egg clusters and the number of eggs in the soil, while forests with a canopy openness and the proportion of oak basal area have positive effects. Some theories for the destructive impacts of dense shrubbery on the ability of M. hippocastani to lay eggs in the soil include: the shrub acting as an impenetrable barrier, flight imprecision of the beetle, and the use of olfaction to sense the environment as methods with which the shrubbery could impact the egg laying behaviour. These techniques have potential to understand egg laying patterns to mitigate forest damage.^[10]

Related Research Articles

Helicoverpa zea, commonly known as the corn earworm, is a species in the family Noctuidae. The larva of the moth Helicoverpa zea is a major agricultural pest. Since it is polyphagous during the larval stage, the species has been given many different common names, including the cotton bollworm and the tomato fruitworm. It also consumes a wide variety of other crops.

The common cockchafer, also colloquially known as the Maybug, Maybeetle, or doodlebug, is a species of scarab beetle belonging to the genus Melolontha. It is native to Europe, and it is one of several closely-related and morphologically similar species of Melolontha called cockchafers, alongside Melolontha hippocastani.

The drugstore beetle, also known as the bread beetle, biscuit beetle, and misnamed as the biscuit weevil, is a tiny, brown beetle. It can be found infesting a wide variety of dried plant products, where it is among the most common non-weevils to be found. It is the only living member of the genus Stegobium. It belongs to the family Ptinidae, which also includes the deathwatch beetle and furniture beetle. A notable characteristic of this species is the symbiotic relationship the beetles have with the yeast they carry, which are transmitted from female to larvae through the oviduct.

Aethina tumida,commonly known as small hive beetle (SHB), is a beekeeping pest. It is native to sub-Saharan Africa, but has spread to many other regions, including North America, Australia, and the Philippines.

The codling moth is a member of the Lepidopteran family Tortricidae. They are major pests to agricultural crops, mainly fruits such as apples and pears, and a codling moth larva is often called an "apple worm". Because the larvae are not able to feed on leaves, they are highly dependent on fruits as a food source and thus have a significant impact on crops. The caterpillars bore into fruit and stop it from growing, which leads to premature ripening. Various means of control, including chemical, biological, and preventive, have been implemented. This moth has a widespread distribution, being found on six continents. Adaptive behavior such as diapause and multiple generations per breeding season have allowed this moth to persist even during years of bad climatic conditions.

Acalymma vittatum, the striped cucumber beetle, is a beetle of the family Chrysomelidae and a serious pest of cucurbit crops in both larval and adult stages. The striped cucumber beetle has a distinctive appearance, displaying a yellow-colored elytra with black stripes. It is distributed from eastern North America to the Rocky Mountains and can be found as far south as Mexico and as far North as southern Canada. In western North America, past the Rocky Mountains, the striped cucumber beetle is replaced by Acalymma trivittatum, a duller colored species often with grayish or pale white elytra rather than yellow.

The European corn borer, also known as the European corn worm or European high-flyer, is a moth of the family Crambidae. It is a pest of grain, particularly maize. The insect is native to Europe, originally infesting varieties of millet, including broom corn. The European corn borer was first reported in North America in 1917 in Massachusetts, but was probably introduced from Europe several years earlier. Since its initial discovery in the Americas, the insect has spread into Canada and westwards across the United States to the Rocky Mountains.

Melolonthinae is a subfamily of the scarab beetles. It is a very diverse group; distributed over most of the world, it contains over 11,000 species in over 750 genera. Some authors include the scarab subfamilies Euchirinae and Pachypodinae as tribes in the Melolonthinae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leek moth</span> Species of moth

The leek moth or onion leaf miner is a species of moth of family Acrolepiidae and the genus Acrolepiopsis. The species is native to Europe and Siberia, but is also found in North America, where it is an invasive species. While it was initially recorded in Hawaii, this was actually a misidentification of Acrolepiopsis sapporensis.

Spodoptera littoralis, also referred to as the African cotton leafworm or Egyptian cotton leafworm or Mediterranean brocade, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae. S. littoralis is found widely in Africa, Mediterranean Europe and Middle Eastern countries. It is a highly polyphagous organism that is a pest of many cultivated plants and crops. As a result, this species was assigned the label of A2 quarantine pest by the EPPO and was cautioned as a highly invasive species in the United States. The devastating impacts caused by these pests have led to the development of both biological and chemical control methods. This moth is often confused with Spodoptera litura.

Nicrophorus quadripunctatus is a species of burying beetle that predominates in East Asia. First described by German entomologist Ernst Kraatz in 1877, this beetle has since been the subject of much scientific inquiry—particularly concerning its parental care. Like other burying beetles, N. quadripunctatus inhabit small, vertebrate animal carcasses. This environment provides the beetles with the requisite nutrients for themselves and their offspring. To limit resource theft and predation, the carcass is buried underground. For additional protection, a single, dominant male-female pair guards the carcass cooperatively.

<i>Mythimna unipuncta</i> Species of moth

Mythimna unipuncta, the true armyworm moth, white-speck moth, common armyworm, or rice armyworm, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae. The species was first described by Adrian Hardy Haworth in 1809. Mythimna unipuncta occurs in most of North America south of the Arctic, as well as parts of South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Although thought to be Neotropical in origin, it has been introduced elsewhere, and is often regarded as an agricultural pest. They are known as armyworms because the caterpillars move in lines as a massive group, like an army, from field to field, damaging crops.

Helicoverpa punctigera, the native budworm, Australian bollworm or Chloridea marmada, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae. This species is native to Australia. H. punctigera are capable of long-distance migration from their inland Australian habitat towards coastal regions and are an occasional migrant to New Zealand.

Monochamus scutellatus, commonly known as the white-spotted sawyer or spruce sawyer or spruce bug, is a common wood-boring beetle found throughout North America. It is a species native to North America.

Callosobruchus chinensis, also known as the adzuki bean weevil, pulse beetle, Chinese bruchid or cowpea bruchid, is a common species of beetle found in the bean weevil subfamily. Although it is commonly known as the adzuki bean weevil, it is in fact not a true weevil, belonging instead to the leaf beetle family, Chrysomelidae.

Cyclocephala lurida, the southern masked chafer, is a species of beetle in the family Scarabaeidae which is native to the southeastern United States. It is a brown beetle with a black head, with an adult length of 10 to 14 mm. The adult beetles cause no harm, but the eggs are laid underground and the developing larvae feed on grass roots and can kill turf under dry conditions.

Dendroctonus valens, also known as the red turpentine beetle, is a species of bark beetle characterized by a dark-reddish brown hue. It is native to forests across North and Central America. In its adult form, these beetles range from six to ten millimeters in length. A notable characteristic about them is their use of acoustic signals and chemical cues when engaging in what is a very complex mating process.

Ips pini, also known as the pine engraver or North American pine engraver, is a species of typical bark beetle in the family Curculionidae found primarily in North America. These beetles are subcategorized by the distinctive geographic ranges in which they are found. A key distinguishing feature of different populations is how they produce the enantiomeric composition of ipsdienol, the major pheromone produced by males of this species.

Bactrocera carambolae, also known as the carambola fruit fly, is a fruit fly species in the family Tephritidae, and is native to Asia. This species was described by Drew and Hancock in 1994.

The white worm beetle is a species of beetle in the family Scarabaeidae. It is the only species in the genus Hylamorpha. This beetle is native to South America, particularly in regions of Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay.

References

1 2 3 4 "Melolontha hippocastani Fabricius, 1801 Northern Cockchafer". UK Beetles. Retrieved 2023-06-08.
1 2 3 Niemczyk, Tereba (10 February 2024). "The weak genetic structure of Melolontha melolontha (L.) and Melolontha hippocastani (Fabr.), two important forest pests, indicates their large population sizes and effective gene flow". Forestry. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpae004.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Ruther, J.; Reinecke, A.; Thiemann, K.; Tolasch, T.; Francke, W.; Hilker, M. (June 2000). "Mate finding in the forest cockchafer, Melolontha hippocastani , mediated by volatiles from plants and females". Physiological Entomology. 25 (2): 172–179. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00183.x. ISSN 0307-6962.
1 2 3 4 Wagenhoff, E.; Blum, R.; Delb, H. (2014-04-30). "Spring phenology of cockchafers, Melolontha spp. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), in forests of south-western Germany: results of a 3-year survey on adult emergence, swarming flights, and oogenesis from 2009 to 2011". Journal of Forest Science. 60 (4): 154–165. doi: 10.17221/5/2014-JFS .
↑ Ruther, Joachim; Reinecke, Andreas; Tolasch, Till; Hilker, Monika (2001-06-01). "Make love not war: a common arthropod defence compound as sex pheromone in the forest cockchafer Melolontha hippocastani". Oecologia. 128 (1): 44–47. Bibcode:2001Oecol.128...44R. doi:10.1007/s004420100634. ISSN 1432-1939. PMID 28547088. S2CID 21954439.
1 2 3 Ruther, Joachim; Reinecke, Andreas; Hilker, Monika (February 2002). "Plant volatiles in the sexual communication of Melolontha hippocastani : response towards time-dependent bouquets and novel function of ( Z )-3-hexen-1-ol as a sexual kairomone". Ecological Entomology. 27 (1): 76–83. Bibcode:2002EcoEn..27...76R. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.0373a.x. ISSN 0307-6946. S2CID 84796501.
↑ Arias-Cordero, Erika; Ping, Liyan; Reichwald, Kathrin; Delb, Horst; Platzer, Mathias; Boland, Wilhelm (2012-12-10). "Comparative Evaluation of the Gut Microbiota Associated with the Below- and Above-Ground Life Stages (Larvae and Beetles) of the Forest Cockchafer, Melolontha hippocastani". PLOS ONE. 7 (12): e51557. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...751557A. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051557 . ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3519724 . PMID 23251574.
1 2 Arias-Cordero, Erika; Ping, Liyan; Reichwald, Kathrin; Delb, Horst; Platzer, Mathias; Boland, Wilhelm (2012-12-10). "Comparative Evaluation of the Gut Microbiota Associated with the Below- and Above-Ground Life Stages (Larvae and Beetles) of the Forest Cockchafer, Melolontha hippocastani". PLOS ONE. 7 (12): e51557. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...751557A. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051557 . ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3519724 . PMID 23251574.
↑ Martinek, Petr; Kula, Emanuel; Hedbávný, Josef (2018-02-01). "Reactions of Melolontha hippocastani adults to high manganese content in food". Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 148: 37–43. Bibcode:2018EcoES.148...37M. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.10.020. ISSN 0147-6513. PMID 29031117.
1 2 3 Cours, Jérémy; Nageleisen, Louis-Michel; Touffait, Régine; Schmuck, Hubert; Brault, Stéphane; Bréda, Nathalie; Richter, Claudine; Saintonge, François-Xavier; Boulanger, Vincent (June 2021). "Oviposition preference of the forest cockchafer (Melolontha hippocastani Fabr. 1801) at the stand scale depends on oak proportion, canopy openness and ground accessibility". Annals of Forest Science. 78 (2): 53. Bibcode:2021AnFSc..78...53C. doi:10.1007/s13595-021-01066-z. ISSN 1297-966X.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[:ukbeetles-1] 1 2 3 4 "Melolontha hippocastani Fabricius, 1801 Northern Cockchafer". UK Beetles. Retrieved 2023-06-08.

[:0-2] 1 2 3 Niemczyk, Tereba (10 February 2024). "The weak genetic structure of Melolontha melolontha (L.) and Melolontha hippocastani (Fabr.), two important forest pests, indicates their large population sizes and effective gene flow". Forestry. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpae004.

[:2-3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ruther, J.; Reinecke, A.; Thiemann, K.; Tolasch, T.; Francke, W.; Hilker, M. (June 2000). "Mate finding in the forest cockchafer, Melolontha hippocastani , mediated by volatiles from plants and females". Physiological Entomology. 25 (2): 172–179. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00183.x. ISSN 0307-6962.

[:1-4] 1 2 3 4 Wagenhoff, E.; Blum, R.; Delb, H. (2014-04-30). "Spring phenology of cockchafers, Melolontha spp. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), in forests of south-western Germany: results of a 3-year survey on adult emergence, swarming flights, and oogenesis from 2009 to 2011". Journal of Forest Science. 60 (4): 154–165. doi: 10.17221/5/2014-JFS .

[5] Ruther, Joachim; Reinecke, Andreas; Tolasch, Till; Hilker, Monika (2001-06-01). "Make love not war: a common arthropod defence compound as sex pheromone in the forest cockchafer Melolontha hippocastani". Oecologia. 128 (1): 44–47. Bibcode:2001Oecol.128...44R. doi:10.1007/s004420100634. ISSN 1432-1939. PMID 28547088. S2CID 21954439.

[:5-6] 1 2 3 Ruther, Joachim; Reinecke, Andreas; Hilker, Monika (February 2002). "Plant volatiles in the sexual communication of Melolontha hippocastani : response towards time-dependent bouquets and novel function of ( Z )-3-hexen-1-ol as a sexual kairomone". Ecological Entomology. 27 (1): 76–83. Bibcode:2002EcoEn..27...76R. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.0373a.x. ISSN 0307-6946. S2CID 84796501.

[7] Arias-Cordero, Erika; Ping, Liyan; Reichwald, Kathrin; Delb, Horst; Platzer, Mathias; Boland, Wilhelm (2012-12-10). "Comparative Evaluation of the Gut Microbiota Associated with the Below- and Above-Ground Life Stages (Larvae and Beetles) of the Forest Cockchafer, Melolontha hippocastani". PLOS ONE. 7 (12): e51557. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...751557A. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051557 . ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3519724 . PMID 23251574.

[:4-8] 1 2 Arias-Cordero, Erika; Ping, Liyan; Reichwald, Kathrin; Delb, Horst; Platzer, Mathias; Boland, Wilhelm (2012-12-10). "Comparative Evaluation of the Gut Microbiota Associated with the Below- and Above-Ground Life Stages (Larvae and Beetles) of the Forest Cockchafer, Melolontha hippocastani". PLOS ONE. 7 (12): e51557. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...751557A. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051557 . ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3519724 . PMID 23251574.

[9] Martinek, Petr; Kula, Emanuel; Hedbávný, Josef (2018-02-01). "Reactions of Melolontha hippocastani adults to high manganese content in food". Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 148: 37–43. Bibcode:2018EcoES.148...37M. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.10.020. ISSN 0147-6513. PMID 29031117.

[:3-10] 1 2 3 Cours, Jérémy; Nageleisen, Louis-Michel; Touffait, Régine; Schmuck, Hubert; Brault, Stéphane; Bréda, Nathalie; Richter, Claudine; Saintonge, François-Xavier; Boulanger, Vincent (June 2021). "Oviposition preference of the forest cockchafer (Melolontha hippocastani Fabr. 1801) at the stand scale depends on oak proportion, canopy openness and ground accessibility". Annals of Forest Science. 78 (2): 53. Bibcode:2021AnFSc..78...53C. doi:10.1007/s13595-021-01066-z. ISSN 1297-966X.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]