Pacheco Pass Tunnels

Last updated

Contents

Pacheco Pass Tunnels
BSicon exCONTg.svg
to San Francisco
BSicon exTUNNEL2.svg
1.5 mi (2.4 km)
BSicon exSTR.svg
BSicon extSTRa.svg
BSicon extSTR.svg
13 mi (21 km)
BSicon extSKRZ-G4.svg
BSicon extSTR.svg
BSicon extSTRe.svg
BSicon exCONTf.svg
to Bakersfield

The Pacheco Pass Tunnels are a planned set of tunnels to carry California High-Speed Rail across the Diablo Range in the vicinity of Pacheco Pass east of Gilroy, California. The tunnels will constitute the first mountain crossing constructed as part of California High-Speed Rail, connecting the San Francisco Bay Area and Central Valley portions of the system. [1]

The tunnels are planned to consist of two 28-foot (8.5 m) diameter tunnels. [2] At 13 miles (21 km) long the main tunnel is expected to become North America’s longest rail tunnel, surpassing the Mount Macdonald Tunnel in British Columbia. [1] [2] An additional 1.5-mile (2.4 km) rail tunnel is planned to be constructed to the west. The tunnels are expected to cost around $5 billion. [2]

The right-of-way runs parallel to the existing Pacheco Tunnel and Santa Clara Tunnel, two contiguous water tunnels connecting the San Luis Reservoir into Santa Clara County. [2] [3]

History

Relief map of California.png
Locations of the Pacheco and Altamont Passes in California. Both were considered for the California High-Speed Rail route, with the Pacheco Pass option being selected.

In 2004, two options were in consideration for the Diablo Range crossing: the Pacheco Pass option and a "direct" 31-mile (50 km) tunnel between San Jose and Merced significantly north of the Pacheco Pass. [3] A route through the Altamont Pass even further north was also considered. [4] In July 2008 the Pacheco Pass option was selected. [5] The reasons were that the Altamont alignment would require the track to split west of the pass to serve different parts of the Bay Area, would require a new crossing of the San Francisco Bay using a rehabilitated Dumbarton Rail Bridge or a new bridge or tunnel nearby, and would require more homes to be seized by eminent domain. The Pacheco alignment, however, would increase travel times between the Bay Area and points north of Merced, and passes through more environmentally sensitive areas. [4] [6] [7]

A November 2009 court ruling however reopened the environmental review process. [5] The suit was brought by the cities of Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Atherton, which opposed elevated high-speed rail tracks running through them and preferred the Altamont Pass route. By September 2010, the rail authority had completed extra studies and reapproved the same route. However, a November 2011 ruling again overturned the approval. [6] The Pacheco Pass alignment was upheld by the California Court of Appeal for the Third District in July 2014. [8] [9]

In June 2017, the California High-Speed Rail Authority began performing geological sampling of the tunnel area, with a design-build contract expected to be awarded in 2018. [2] The rock under Pacheco Pass is known to be of the Franciscan Assemblage formation. [2] [3] [10]

On February 12, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom in his first State of the State address announced that parts of the system outside the Central Valley segment from Bakersfield to Merced would be indefinitely postponed, including the Pacheco Pass Tunnel. [11] Nonetheless, the CaHSRA board chose the tunnel alignment as their preferred build alternative in September 2019. [12] As of 2020 this section of the system has a projected start of service in 2031. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Merced, California</span> City in Merced County, California, United States

Merced is a city in, and the county seat of, Merced County, California, United States, in the San Joaquin Valley. As of the 2020 Census, the city had a population of 86,333, up from 78,958 in 2010. Incorporated on April 1, 1889, Merced is a charter city that operates under a council–manager government. It is named after the Merced River, which flows nearby.

<i>San Joaquins</i> Amtrak service in San Joaquin Valley, California

The San Joaquins is a passenger train service operated by Amtrak in California's San Joaquin Valley. Six daily round trips run between its southern terminus at Bakersfield and Stockton, with onward service to Sacramento and Oakland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California State Route 152</span> East-west highway in central California

State Route 152 is a state highway that runs from east to west near the middle of the U.S. state of California from State Route 1 in Watsonville to State Route 99 southeast of Merced. Its western portion provides access to and from Interstate 5 toward Southern California for motorists in or near Gilroy and San Jose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Altamont Corridor Express</span> Commuter rail service in California

The Altamont Corridor Express is a commuter rail service in California, connecting Stockton and San Jose during peak hours only. ACE is named for the Altamont Pass, through which it runs. Service is managed by the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, and operations are contracted to Herzog Transit Services. The 86-mile (138 km) route includes ten stops, with travel time about 2 hours and 12 minutes end-to-end. In 2022, the line had a ridership of 389,100, or about 2,500 per weekday as of the third quarter of 2023. ACE uses Bombardier BiLevel Coaches, MPI F40PH-3C locomotives, and Siemens Charger locomotives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacheco Pass</span> Mountain pass in the Diablo Range, California, U.S.

Pacheco Pass, elevation 1,368 ft (417 m), is a low mountain pass located in the Diablo Range in southeastern Santa Clara County, California. It is the main route through the hills separating the Santa Clara Valley and the Central Valley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Altamont Pass</span> Mountain pass through the Diablo Range in Northern California

Altamont Pass, formerly Livermore Pass, is a low mountain pass in the Diablo Range of Northern California between Livermore in the Livermore Valley and Tracy in the San Joaquin Valley. The name is actually applied to two distinct but nearby crossings of the range. The lower of the two, at an elevation of 741 ft (226 m), carries two railroad rights-of-way (ROWs) and Altamont Pass Road, part of the old Lincoln Highway and the original alignment of US 50 before it was bypassed c. 1937. The bypass route travels over the higher summit, at 1,009 ft (308 m), and now carries Interstate 580, a major regional highway heavily congested by Central Valley suburbanization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California High-Speed Rail</span> Under-construction passenger rail system

California High-Speed Rail is a publicly funded high-speed rail system being developed in the U.S. state of California by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. It was authorized by a statewide ballot proposal called Proposition 1A. It is intended to reduce travel times in the state, particularly between the major urban areas of the north and the south. The system is also intended to reduce pollution and carbon emissions, ease highway and air traffic congestion, and boost the state's economy, particularly in the Central Valley region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amtrak California</span> Caltrans passenger rail services

Amtrak California is a brand name used by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Rail for three state-supported Amtrak regional rail routes in California – the Capitol Corridor, the Pacific Surfliner, and the San Joaquins – and their associated connecting network of Amtrak Thruway transportation services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diablo Range</span> Mountain range in the California Coastal Ranges

The Diablo Range is a mountain range in the California Coast Ranges subdivision of the Pacific Coast Ranges in northern California, United States. It stretches from the eastern San Francisco Bay Area at its northern end to the Salinas Valley area at its southern end.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of rail transportation in California</span>

The establishment of America's transcontinental rail lines securely linked California to the rest of the country, and the far-reaching transportation systems that grew out of them during the century that followed contributed to the state's social, political, and economic development. When California was admitted as a state to the United States in 1850, and for nearly two decades thereafter, it was in many ways isolated, an outpost on the Pacific, until the first transcontinental railroad was completed in 1869.

Throughout the history of Bay Area Rapid Transit, there have been plans to extend service to other areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southern Crossing (California)</span> Proposed fixed link across the San Francisco Bay

The Southern Crossing is a proposed highway structure that would span San Francisco Bay in California, somewhere south of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge and north of the San Mateo–Hayward Bridge. Several proposals have been made since 1947, varying in design and specific location, but none of them have ever been implemented because of cost, environmental and other concerns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California State Transportation Agency</span>

The California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) is a state cabinet-level agency responsible for transportation-related departments within the state. The agency was created under Governor Jerry Brown in 2013 after the previous Business, Transportation and Housing Agency's portfolio underwent reorganization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Construction of California High-Speed Rail</span>

The construction of the California High-Speed Rail system is an undertaking by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. The project is expected to span about 800 miles (1,300 km) and will be completed in two phases:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of California High-Speed Rail</span>

The California High-Speed Rail Authority was established in 1996 after decades of advocacy for building a high speed rail system in California. The passage of Proposition 1A in 2008, followed by the awarding of federal stimulus funds in 2010, established the initial funding for the California High-Speed Rail system. Construction contracts began to be awarded in 2013, and the groundbreaking ceremony for initial construction was held on January 6, 2015.

Merced station is a proposed California High-Speed Rail station in Merced, California, located in Downtown Merced. The environmentally approved site is on Martin Luther King Jr. Way near the interchange with Route 99/59, placing it about 7 blocks south from the existing Merced Amtrak station. The station was initially intended to be the northern terminus of the system's Initial Construction Segment. As of April 2022 the California High-Speed Rail Authority is studying an alternative location proposed by the City of Merced and other stakeholders, 8 blocks to the west-northwest along 15th Street, between O Street and R Street. The high-speed rail line will run on the south side of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way at these locations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Route of California High-Speed Rail</span> Route of the California High-Speed Rail system

The California High-Speed Rail system will be built in two major phases. Phase I, about 520 miles (840 km) long using high-speed rail through the Central Valley, will connect San Francisco to Los Angeles. In Phase 2, the route will be extended in the Central Valley north to Sacramento, and from east through the Inland Empire and then south to San Diego. The total system length will be about 800 miles (1,300 km) long. Phase 2 currently has no timeline for completion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caltrain Modernization Program</span> Railway electrification project in California, US

The Caltrain Modernization Program (CalMod), sometimes referred to as the Caltrain Electrification Project, is a $2.44 billion project that will add a positive train control (PTC) system and electrify the main line of the U.S. commuter railroad Caltrain, which serves cities in the San Francisco Peninsula and Silicon Valley, as well as transition from its current diesel-electric locomotive powered trains to electric multiple units (EMU). According to Caltrain, electrification of the tracks will allow it to improve service times via faster acceleration and shorter headways, reduce air pollution and noise, and facilitate a future railway tunnel into downtown San Francisco's Salesforce Transit Center, as diesel trains cannot serve underground stations.

The Downtown Rail Extension (DTX) is a planned second phase of the San Francisco Transbay Transit Center (TTC). When complete, it will extend the Caltrain Peninsula Corridor commuter rail line from its current northern terminus at 4th and King via a 1.3 mi (2.1 km) tunnel. The new terminus will be near the Financial District and will provide intermodal connections to BART, Muni, Transbay AC Transit buses, and long-distance buses. In addition, the California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) plans to use DTX and the Caltrain-owned Peninsula Corridor for service on the CHSRA San Francisco–San Jose segment. Because DTX uses a long tunnel, current diesel locomotives are not suitable and the Caltrain Modernization Project (CalMod), which includes electrification of the line and acquisition of electrified rolling stock, is a prerequisite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Valley Link</span> Proposed commuter rail service in northern California

Valley Link is a proposed 26-mile-long (42 km) commuter rail service in Northern California, which seeks to connect the rapid transit Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system in the San Francisco Bay Area with the northern San Joaquin Valley via the Tri-Valley region. At present, BART's Blue Line's eastern terminus is at Dublin/Pleasanton station on the border of Dublin and Pleasanton. Valley Link seeks to extend rail service east from here into the northern San Joaquin Valley over Altamont Pass and to help alleviate traffic congestion and reducing greenhouse gas emissions on Interstate 580 (I-580). The project resulted from various failed proposals to extend the Blue Line east to Livermore.

References

  1. 1 2 Meachan, Jody (January 30, 2017). "High-speed rail considers 2 record-setting options for Pacheco Pass tunnel". Silicon Valley Business Journal. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Meacham, Jody (June 14, 2017). "What's under Pacheco Pass and what's it mean for California high-speed rail?". Silicon Valley Business Journal. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 "Tunneling Issues Report" (PDF). California High-Speed Rail Authority. January 2004. pp. 16, 22–23. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 27, 2019. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  4. 1 2 Cabanatuan, Michael (November 15, 2007). "High Speed Rail Authority staff advises Pacheco Pass route to L.A." SFGate. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
  5. 1 2 "Appendix G: Draft Alternatives Analysis Public Participation Report for the San Jose to Merced High-Speed Train Project EIR/EIS" (PDF). California High-Speed Rail Authority. 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 2, 2019. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  6. 1 2 Rosenberg, Mike (November 10, 2011). "Judge: Bullet train must ax route through South Bay, Peninsula, for now". The Mercury News. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
  7. Lew, Alexander (December 22, 2007). "California High Speed Rail's Route Debate Is Over". Wired. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
  8. Sheehan, Tim (July 24, 2014). "Appellate court upholds environmental work for high-speed rail via Pacheco Pass". Fresno Bee. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
  9. "Third Court of Appeal: Atherton v. CaHSRA". DocumentCloud. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  10. Rush, Jim (November 17, 2016). "Connecting California: High-Speed Rail System to Enhance Statewide Transportation Network". Tunnel Business Magazine. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
  11. Willon, Phil; Luna, Taryn (February 12, 2019). "Gov. Gavin Newsom pledges to scale back high-speed rail and twin-tunnels projects in State of the State speech". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 13, 2019.
  12. Brinklow, Adam (September 20, 2019). "California High-Speed Rail board votes to bring trains to San Francisco". Curbed. Retrieved September 23, 2019.
  13. Thadani, Trisha (July 10, 2020). "Plan for high-speed rail rolls out for San Francisco to San Jose - but with little cash". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved July 12, 2020.