Registration of Intellectual Property in Ghana

Last updated

Registration of intellectual property in Ghana is key to safeguarding one's intellectual efforts from infringement. [1] Intellectual property law of Ghana encompasses intellectual property (IP) laws in Ghana, such as laws governing copyright, patent, trademark, industrial design rights, and unfair competition. The main intellectual property laws in Ghana include the Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690), the Patents Act, 2003 (Act 657), the Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664), the Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660) and the Protection Against Unfair Competition Act, 2000 (Act 589). These are supplemented by regulations passed by the Legislature to augment the rate of development under IP laws.

Contents

In Ghana, the creator or author of a work is entitled to the copyright and protection afforded to that work under the Copyright Act. [2] However, in situations where a person is hired specifically for the creation of the work, the one who can claim ownership of the copyright will be the employer. [3] Also, if an author sells out his or her entire Economic Rights (which is usually for a stipulated period of time), then during the time when the license is in force, ownership of copyright is temporarily vested in the licensee (i.e. the one who purchased the license from the original creator). [4]

Registration

For a person to be able to register their Copyright in Ghana, the person must first be a citizen or a person who ordinarily resides in the Republic of Ghana. [5] Also, the work must first be published in the country and where work is first published outside the Republic, it must be subsequently published within the country; between thirty days of its publication outside the Republic ... “irrespective of its artistic quality”. [6] In the case of Shah v Barnet London Borough Council, Lord Scarman defined an ordinary resident as ‘a man's abode in a particular place or country which he has adopted voluntarily and for settled purposes as part of the regular order of his life for the time being, whether of short or long duration’. [7] Moreover, the Act provides for the kind of works which will be eligible for copyright protection such as musical work, sound recording, audiovisual work, choreographic work amongst others. [8]

The Act provides for the registration of a copyright work and section 39(3) is to the effect that, a publisher of a work may submit the work for registration by the Copyright Administrator after it has been published and two copies of the best edition may be deposited at the Copyright Office. [9]

However, it is prominent to note that “Copyright protection of a work is not dependent on the registration of the work”, which means, copyright arises automatically and one need not register his work for copyright protection so long as it is original. [10]

Registration of Copyright provides a primary facie evidence of ownership. [11] Duration of protection lasts for the lifetime of the author plus an additional seventy (70) years after his death. [12] The author can also assign economic rights not moral rights. [13]

General Parties need not register in order to obtain copyright protection for their works, however, parties seeking to enforce their copyright in Ghana may wish to register their works to establish evidence of ownership should enforcement actions be necessary. [10] Right-holders register their copyright with the Copyright Office within the office of the Attorney.

Copyright holders in Ghana enjoy the following exclusive rights:

The right to reproduce the work in any manner or form;

Law of patent and registration

Introduction

A patent according to section 1 of the Patent Act, is the right to protect an invention. [15] In the Massachusetts Circuit Court ruling in the patent case of Davoll et al. v. Brown, Justice Charles L. Woodbury wrote that "only in this way can we protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests are as much a man's own...as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears." [16] [17]

Application for registration of patent

The application for the registration of a patent is required to be filed with the Registrar and should contain a request for the patent, a description of the invention seeking patent protection, and where required, drawings of it. [18] The applicant must pay the prescribed application fee. [19] The request should contain a petition to the effect that a patent be granted, it should also include important details of the applicant, the inventor and the agent, if any, as well as the title of the invention. [20] In circumstances where the applicant is not the inventor, the request shall be submitted with a justification as to the applicant's right to the patent. [21] The description disclosing the invention should be distinct, clear and easily understood, such that a person having ordinary skill in the art is capable of carrying out the invention. [22] It should also indicate at least one mode of carrying out the invention. [22] The essence of a claim in the request is to define the subject matter of the protection. [23] Claims must be clear and concise and supported by the description. [24] Drawings would only be necessary for the understanding of the invention. [25] The applicant may, withdraw the application during the period of wait for the grant of the application. [26]

The application should relate to one invention only or where they are a group of inventions, they must be linked so as to form a single inventive concept. [27] The applicant may opt to amend the application prior to the grant of the right, however, such amendment must not affect the core of the initial disclosure made. [28] The applicant may divide the application into divisional applications but each divisional application is only limited to that before the initial disclosure. [29] Each divisional application shall have a filing date and, where applicable, a priority date. [30] It is noteworthy however, that a patent would not be invalidated because it does not comply with the requirement of unity as in subsection (1) of section 6. [31]

Filing date; examination

The date of receipt of the application shall be recognised as the filing date if as at the time of receipt, the application contained indications as to the request for a patent grant, indications as to the identity of the applicant and a description of the invention. [32]

The Registrar may request the applicant to make corrections to his application if the requirements are not met. [33] If the application refers to drawings, which are not included in the application, the applicant would be requested to produce those drawings. [34] The Registrar may then assess if the application complies with the requirements of section 5 subsections (1), (2), (3) and (4), and the other requirements indicated as formal requirements and whether information requested under section 8, if any, has been provided. [35] Where the Registrar is satisfied that the application complies with such requirements, the Registrar shall cause the application to be examined as to whether the requirements of sections 1(2) and (3), 2, 3, 5 (5), (6), (7), (8), and 6 have been complied with. [36] The Registrar would however, take in to consideration international reports or findings relating to the application. [37]

Grant of patent

The Registrar grants the application if the requirements enshrined in sections 9(6) and 9(7) are complied with. [38] He may, however, refuse same if there is non-compliance and notify the applicant of the refusal. [39]

When the patent right is granted, a publication of the reference of the grant to the patent shall be made, and the certificate of the grant of patent, as well as a copy, a record of the patent made available to the public; on payment of the prescribed fee. [40] The Registrar's final decision concerning the application should be made not exceeding two years after his examination. [41] The owner of the patent, may request that changes be made in the text or drawings of the patent in order to limit the extent of the protection. [42] However, no change will be made if the change would result in a disclosure which goes beyond the disclosure contained in the initial application on the basis of which the patent is granted. [43]

Industrial designs act, 2003 (ACT 660)

An industrial design right protects the visual design of objects that are not purely utilitarian. An industrial design consists of the creation of a shape, configuration or composition of pattern or color, or combination of pattern and color in three-dimensional form containing aesthetic value. [44] An industrial design can be a two-or three-dimensional pattern used to produce a product, industrial commodity or handicraft.

Process of application for registration

An application may be made to the Registrar by an applicant for the registration of an industrial design. [45] The application is subject to some payment fees as prescribed and it shall contain a request, drawings, photographs or any other adequate practice representation of the Industrial design, as well as an indication of which design is to be used. [46] In order to protect the creator or the legitimate person entitled to the registration, the application shall contain a justification of the applicant's right in applying, where he is not the creator. [47] The application may also contain a specimen of the design where the design is two dimensional and evidence of a prior application filed either at national, regional or international levels. [48] Where the Registrar finds that the requirements as under section 5 of Act 660 have not been fulfilled and the regulations pertaining to the declaration as claimed under section 5 (4)(b) are not fulfilled, the declaration shall not be considered to have been made. [49]

It is also noteworthy, that two or more industrial designs may be the subject of the same application if they relate to the same class of International Classification or the same set of articles. [50] The Act does not impede the right of the applicant to withdraw the application during the period of assessing the application. [51] The Registrar subsequently examines the application for any corrections. [52] Opportunity is given for anyone to oppose the application as filed, within a prescribed period and in a prescribed manner on the grounds that the requirements of sections 1 and 2 have not been met or that the applicant does not have the right to register. [53] Opposition is done through a notice to the Registrar. [53] However, the Registrar shall register the Industrial design and publish a reference to the registration and issue to the applicant, a certificate of registration of the Industrial design where the Registrar is satisfied that the requisite requirements have been met and the application has been unopposed, or even if opposed, decided in favour of the applicant. [54] If the Registrar is on the contrary, not satisfied that the Industrial design is registrable, he may refuse the application. [55]

Registration of the Industrial design grants the person with the registered right, exclusive rights over the design. He has the sole right of granting consent to any entity or person who wants to exploit the registered design. [56] He also has the right to institute court proceedings in addition to other rights and remedies, against anyone who infringes the Industrial design or who is likely to make an infringement occur. [57]

Duration of registration

The duration of the registration is for a period of five (5) years starting from the filing date of the application for registration [58] The registration may be renewed for two further consecutive periods, subject to the payment of a prescribed fee. [59] A grace period of six months is allowed for the late payment of the renewal fee. [60] A registered owner may surrender the registration through a notification to the Registrar and this comes into effect from the date of record of the surrender. [61] An application may also be made to the Court for the cancellation of the registration. [62]

The trademarks act, Amendment act 2014 (Act 876)

The Trademarks Act is an Act to cater for the protection of trademarks and matters related. [63] Trademarks are signs that are suitable for distinguishing products or services of a particular enterprise from that of other companies. [64] Trademark protection is available for products and services;Unlike patents and copyrights, trademarks do not expire after a set term of years. [65]

Registration of trademarks

A trademark is subject to registration under section 4 of Act 664. [66] Under section 1 of Act 664, a trademark means a sign or combination of signs including words such as personal names, letters, numerals, and figurative elements. [64] However these signs must be capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from the goods or services of any other undertaking. [64] A trademark is subject to registration and such registration confers an exclusive right of use of the trademark on that person. [67]

Under section 4 of Act 644, the application for the registration of the trademark must be filed with the Registrar and is contingent on the payment of a prescribed fee and further must contain a reproduction of the trademark and a list of goods or services for which the registration of the trademark is made. [66]

According to Act 664, the grounds on which an application for registration of a trademark may be refused include; where the trademark is incapable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from the goods or services of another enterprise; where the trademark is a trade name, or where it is contrary to public order or morality or it is likely to mislead the public or trade circles with particular reference to the geographical origin of the goods or services, their nature or characteristics among others. [68]

Section 6 of Act 664 provides that where the Registrar is satisfied that the application for the registration of the trademark has met all the necessary requirements, the Registrar shall publish it as to enable any persons with oppositions to the application to raise such oppositions on grounds where the application has not satisfied all or part of the necessary requirements. [69]

Where the application has not been opposed within the prescribed time limit or if there were any oppositions, and the matter was granted in favour of the applicant and the Registrar is satisfied that the application has met all necessary requirement, the Registrar shall proceed to register the trademark, publish a reference to the registration and issue the applicant with a certificate of registration. [70]

Meaning of collective mark

A collective mark is a sign used to distinguish the origin or common characteristics of different enterprises which fall under one registered owner of a sign from other enterprises. [71]

Registration of collective mark

The registration procedure for collective marks is the same as the registration procedure for trademarks, thus, the Registrar may grant an applicant a registration certificate for a collective mark once he is satisfied that all requirements under sections 4,5, 6 & 7 of Act 664 have been met. [72]

Rights conferred by registration

Registration of a trademark by a person confers an exclusive right to use the trademark on that person. [67] A person other than a registered owner of a trademark must not knowingly infringe the rights of the owner of a registered trademark by exploiting the trademark without the consent of the owner. [73] if the registered owner is able to prove exploitation of the trademark without his consent, he may institute court action against the offender and such a person may be held to have committed an offence and would be liable on summary conviction to a fine or term of imprisonment or both. [74] Collective Marks also enjoy all the rights as conferred on trademarks per section 8(2) of Act 664. [72]

The duration of the registration of a trademark and collective mark is for ten years and may be renewed for a further period of ten years subject to renewal fees to be paid. [75]

Invalidation of trademark and collective mark

A trademark already registered may be invalidated where either the registered mark failed to satisfy all or part of the necessary requirements for the mark to be registered or the marks have become a common name to the society. [76] An already registered collective mark may be invalidated on three grounds, namely; where only the registered owner uses the trademark to the exclusion of other enterprises, where the registered owner permits the use of the trademark in contravention of the regulations of the collective mark, or where the registered owner uses or permits the use of the trademark in such a way as will likely to cause confusion in trade circles or the public as to the origin of the goods or services concerned. [77]

Trademark registry

The Registrar-General, located at the Registrar-General's Department, is responsible for the registration of trademarks and for the administration of registered marks. [78] A person aggrieved by an omission, error or defect with regards to an entry in the register, may file an application with the Registrar for rectification; however such applications shall not be made to affect the validity of the trademarks in the register. [79] The Registrar has the power to correct an error or a mistake in an application or document filed with the Registry, and an entry made under the Act. [80]

Conclusion

From the Copyright Act right through to the Trademarks Act, the importance of registration is evident. Registration of intellectual property rights vests in the registered owner, exclusive rights which can be exercised in a monopolistic way and gives him rights to court action where there are any faults or offenders seeking to disregard the right of the registered owner. Registration of all intellectual property rights is done with the Registrar General and the applicant must go through a host of procedures, necessary in securing a registration. well said

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Industrial design right</span> Intellectual property rights

An industrial design right is an intellectual property right that protects the visual design of objects that are purely utilitarian. An industrial design consists of the creation of a shape, configuration or composition of pattern or color, or combination of pattern and color in three-dimensional form containing aesthetic value. An industrial design can be a two- or three-dimensional pattern used to produce a product, industrial commodity or handicraft.

The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, signed in Paris, France, on 20 March 1883, was one of the first intellectual property treaties. It established a Union for the protection of industrial property. The convention is still in force in 2024. The substantive provisions of the Convention fall into three main categories: national treatment, priority right and common rules.

In patent law, industrial design law, and trademark law, a priority right or right of priority is a time-limited right, triggered by the first filing of an application for a patent, an industrial design or a trademark respectively. The priority right allows the claimant to file a subsequent application in another country for the same invention, design, or trademark effective as of the date of filing the first application. When filing the subsequent application, the applicant must claim the priority of the first application in order to make use of the right of priority. The right of priority belongs to the applicant or his successor in title.

A patent attorney is an attorney who has the specialized qualifications necessary for representing clients in obtaining patents and acting in all matters and procedures relating to patent law and practice, such as filing patent applications and oppositions to granted patents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Industrial property</span> Intellectual property applied to industry

Industrial property is one of two subsets of intellectual property, it takes a range of forms, including patents for inventions, industrial designs, trademarks, service marks, layout-designs of integrated circuits, commercial names and designations, geographical indications and protection against unfair competition. In some cases, aspects of intellectual creation, although present, are less clearly defined. The object of industrial property consists of signs conveying information, in particular to consumers, regarding products and services offered on the market. Protection is directed against unauthorized use of such signs that could mislead consumers, and against misleading practices in general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Intellectual Property Office</span> Canadian government agency

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office is responsible for the administration and processing of the greater part of intellectual property (IP) in Canada. CIPO's areas of activity include patents, trademarks, copyright, industrial designs and integrated circuit topographies. Structurally, CIPO functions as a special operating agency (SOA) under Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. CIPO is based in Gatineau, Quebec, part of the National Capital Region. CIPO’s current interim Chief Executive Officer is Konstantinos Georgaras.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Design patent</span> US Patent Law

In the United States, a design patent is a form of legal protection granted to the ornamental design of an article of manufacture. Design patents are a type of industrial design right. Ornamental designs of jewelry, furniture, beverage containers and computer icons are examples of objects that are covered by design patents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Utility model</span> Patent-like intellectual property right

A utility model is a patent-like intellectual property right to protect inventions. This type of right is available in many countries but, notably, not in the United States, United Kingdom or Canada. Although a utility model is similar to a patent, it is generally cheaper to obtain and maintain, has a shorter term, shorter grant lag, and less stringent patentability requirements. In some countries, it is only available for inventions in certain fields of technology and/or only for products. Utility models can be described as second-class patents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian trademark law</span>

Canadian trademark law provides protection to marks by statute under the Trademarks Act and also at common law. Trademark law provides protection for distinctive marks, certification marks, distinguishing guises, and proposed marks against those who appropriate the goodwill of the mark or create confusion between different vendors' goods or services. A mark can be protected either as a registered trademark under the Act or can alternately be protected by a common law action in passing off.

Japanese patent law is based on the first-to-file principle and is mainly given force by the Patent Act of Japan. Article 2 defines an invention as "the highly advanced creation of technical ideas utilizing the law of nature".

Scams in intellectual property include scams in which inventors and other rights holders are lured to pay money for an apparently official registration of their intellectual property, or for professional development and promotion of their ideas, but do not receive the expected services.

Title 35 of the United States Code is a title of United States Code regarding patent law. The sections of Title 35 govern all aspects of patent law in the United States. There are currently 37 chapters, which include 376 sections, in Title 35.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trademark</span> Trade identifier of products or services

A trademark is a type of intellectual property consisting of a recognizable sign, design, or expression that identifies a product or service from a particular source and distinguishes it from others. A trademark owner can be an individual, business organization, or any legal entity. A trademark may be located on a package, a label, a voucher, or on the product itself. Trademarks used to identify services are sometimes called service marks.

The laws of Thailand are based on the civil law, but have been influenced by common law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intellectual property in Iran</span>

Iran is a member of the WIPO since 2001 and has acceded to several WIPO intellectual property treaties. Iran joined the Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property in 1959. In December 2003 Iran became a party to the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol for the International Registration of Marks. In 2005 Iran joined the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration, which ensures the protection of geographical names associated with products. As at February 2008 Iran had yet to accede to The Hague Agreement for the Protection of Industrial Designs.

Republic Act No. 8293, otherwise known as The Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines lays down the rules and regulations that grant, and enforce patents in the Philippines. Patents may be granted to technical solutions such as an inventions, machines, devices, processes, or an improvement of any of the foregoing. The technical solution must be novel, innovative, and industrially useful. In order for a technical solution to be granted a patent, the inventor must file an application to the Bureau of Patents, which will examine, and in some cases, grant its approval. The law is designed as to foster domestic creativity, to attract foreign investors, and to motivate inventors to release their products for public access.

The Industrial Designs Act, 2003 is a Ghanaian act to revise the enactments on the protection of industrial designs and to provide for related matters. The Act is one of the Seven Acts that exist to protect Intellectual Property Rights in Ghana namely; Protection against Unfair Competition Act, 2000 ; Industrial Designs Act, 2003 ; Geographical Indications Act, 2003 ; Patents Act, 2003 ; Trademarks Act, 2004 ; Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits Act, 2004 and Copyrights Act, 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trademarks Act, 2004</span> Ghanaian trademark legislation

The Trademarks Act, 2004 is legislation enacted by the Third Parliament of the Fourth Republic of Ghana and signed into law by President John Agyekum Kufuor. The Act regulates the process through which trademarks and collective marks are registered, the issuance of registered trademarks and how trademarks and collective marks are protected through the enforcement of the Act. The rationale for enacting the Act is for the protection of the goodwill and reputation of the business of a proprietor. The Act establishes the Trademark Registry(Registar) to which is mandated to register trademarks and issue registered trademarks. The Act has been amended by the Trademarks (Amendment) Act, 2014 which came into force on 25 July 2014. The Amendment incorporated the Madrid Protocol into The Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyright Act of 1870</span> Former United States law

The Copyright Act of 1870, also called the Patent Act of 1870 and the Trade Mark Act of 1870, was a revision to United States intellectual property law, covering copyrights and patents. Eight sections of the bill, sometimes called the Trade Mark Act of 1870, introduced trademarks to United States federal law, although that portion was later deemed unconstitutional after the Trade-Mark Cases.

Intellectual property of Ethiopia is managed by the Ethiopian Intellectual Property Office (EIFO), who oversees Intellectual Property Right (IPR) issues. Ethiopia has not signed IPR treaty such as the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) copyright treaty, the Berne Convention for Literary and Artistic Works, the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks, and the Patent Cooperation Treaty.

References

  1. "Importance of protecting intellectual property".
  2. Section 1(1); Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  3. Section 7; Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  4. http://www.quorum-online.com/Services/IntProp.htm http://www.copyright.gov.gh/Copyright 2010 Ghana Copyright Office. All Rights Reserved
  5. Section 1(2)(c)(i) Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  6. Section 1(2)(c)(ii); Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  7. Shah v. Barnet London Borough Council [1983] 1 ALL ER 226
  8. Section 1(a); Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  9. Section 39; Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  10. 1 2 Section 39(4); Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  11. Section 40(1); Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  12. Section 12(1); Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  13. Section 9(1); Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  14. Section 5; Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690)
  15. Section 1; Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  16. 1 Woodb.& M.53, 3 West.L.J.151,7 F. Cas.197, No.3662, 2 Robb.Pat.Cas. 303, Merw.Pat.Inv. 414
  17. The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics.
  18. Section 5(1); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  19. Section 5(2); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  20. Section 5(3); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  21. Section 5(4); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  22. 1 2 Section 5(5); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  23. Section 5(6); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  24. Section 5(7); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  25. Section 5(8); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  26. Section 5(10); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  27. Section 6(1); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  28. Section 6(2); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  29. Section 6(3); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  30. Section 6(4); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  31. Section 6(5); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  32. Section 9(1); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  33. Section 9(2); Patents Act; 2003 (Act 675)
  34. Section 9(4); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  35. Section 9(6); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  36. Section 9(7); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  37. Section 9(8); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  38. Section 10(1); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  39. Section 10(1)(b); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  40. Section 10(2); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  41. Section 10(3); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  42. Section 10(4); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  43. Section 10(5); Patents Act, 2003 (Act 675)
  44. Section 1(1)(a); industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  45. Section 5(1); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  46. Section 5(2); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  47. Section 5(3); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  48. Sections 5(4) & 5(5); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  49. Section 5(6); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  50. Section 5(7); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  51. Section 5(8); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  52. Section 6; Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  53. 1 2 Section 7(1); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  54. Section 8(1); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  55. Section 8(2); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  56. Section 9(1); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  57. Section 9(4); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  58. Section 10(1); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  59. Section 10(2); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  60. Section 10(3); Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  61. Section 11; Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  62. Section 12; Industrial Designs Act, 2003 (Act 660)
  63. Preamble of the Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  64. 1 2 3 Section 1; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  65. "Trademarks, Patents, or Copyright?".
  66. 1 2 Section 4; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  67. 1 2 Section 3; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  68. Section 5; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  69. Section 6; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  70. Section 7; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  71. Section 2; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  72. 1 2 Section 8(2); Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  73. Section 9(1), 9(3); Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  74. Section 9(2), 9(8); Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  75. Sections 10 & 11; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  76. Sections 12(1) & (2); Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  77. Section 13; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  78. Section 18(1) & (2); Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  79. Section 20(1); Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)
  80. Section 22; Trademarks Act, 2004 (Act 664)

Trademarks, Patents or Copyright?