Security sector governance and reform

Last updated

The concepts of security sector governance and reform (SSG/R, or SSG and SSR) generally refer to a process in Western-based international development and democratization to amend the security sector of a state towards good governance and its principles, such as freedom of information and the rule of law. [1] [2]

Contents

The objective of security sector reform (SSR) is to achieve good security sector governance (SSG)—where security actors are effective and accountable to their people. For example, SSR might guide decision-making on what form should the oversight of armed forces take or how transparent will intelligence agencies be according to legislation. [3] Different nomenclature of the same overall framework include security system reform (SSR), security sector reconstruction (SSR) and justice and security sector reform (JSSR). [4]

History

In 1994, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) adopted a Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security stating that the democratic control of the security sector as essential to stability. [5]

The framework emerged after Saferworld staff observed from examples in South Africa, Indonesia and countries in Eastern Europe that national security and its components were considered crucial in a state recovering from conflict or an authoritarian regime. On 13 May 1998, Clare Short, Secretary of State for International Development, used the term for the first time, publicly, during a speech at the Royal College of Defence Studies. [6] Reportedly, the increasing number of civil wars led development actors to look at the problem of insecurity from the perspective of good governance. The conclusion was that the security sector should adhere to the same rules of good governance as any other public service to curb conflict and violence. [4] [7] [8]

In 2014, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) adopted its first stand-alone resolution on SSR and within it the role of security sector reform in stabilizing post-conflict countries. [9] [10]

Scope

The quality of the service provided by the police, such as the pictured Police of Denmark, is a component of security sector governance and reform Female police officer of Denmark.jpg
The quality of the service provided by the police, such as the pictured Police of Denmark, is a component of security sector governance and reform

There is no single globally accepted definition of security sector reform (SSR), but it generally refers to a process to reform or rebuild a state's security sector towards good security sector governance (SSG). [11] [12] Good SSG is usually defined as a number of idealized principles and good practices of a healthy security sector servicing its people. Likewise, the objective of SSR is defined as the application of the same principles of good governance to the security sector as to any other public sector service delivery, such as public health or education. [1] [2] [13] For example, the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has defined four standards that SSR should strive for:

1. Establishment of effective governance, oversight and accountability in the security system; 2) improved delivery of security and justice services; 3) development of local leadership and ownership of the reform process; and 4) sustainability of justice and security service delivery. [14]

The target of SSR are the components of the state that uphold national security. Although the security sector is therefore a wide term open to interpretation, it is generally used to describe the structures, institutions and personnel responsible for the management, provision and oversight of security in a certain country. [15] Therefore, the scope and target of SSR has usually been defined comprising the following four groups:

Objective

A diagram of the relationship between security sector reform and governance relative to time and quality SSG and SSR.png
A diagram of the relationship between security sector reform and governance relative to time and quality

To observe and measure the quality of SSG as well as set more definite objectives, international development actors generally break down good security sector governance into different principles that are believed to showcase different subparts of a healthy security sector under democratic control. [17] While exact configurations vary, some of the most common principles or objectives of good SSG that are commonly used include accountability, rule of law, and effectiveness. [18] [19]

A multitude of different practical situations of good SSG exist according to development actors: For example, in a security sector led by good governance, the use of force is defined by a legal framework. This subsequently requires, among others, that publicly transparent laws are in place; oversight and separation of powers mechanisms are established and working; and the state's legitimate use of force is regulated through strategies and policies. [1] [14] An operational level example would be improved and open interaction between the public and the security sector, including functioning freedom of information and complaint institutes. [4]

SSR is aimed at the existence of both national security and human security. However, the goals of providing national and human security can be conflictual in the context of conflict-torn societies which lack the framework of democratic governance. According to Florian Weigand, the experiences of SSR in Afghanistan, for example, have prompted a debate on the advantages of providing human rather than state security in the process of state-building. [20]

Implementation

The UN peacekeeping operation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) providing security sector reform assistance MONUSCO SSR.jpg
The UN peacekeeping operation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) providing security sector reform assistance

SSR is considered an instrument of international development aid; and attaining good SSG is seen by practitioners as a conflict prevention tool and as a post-conflict stabilizer. [21] [7] Examples of mechanisms that international actors reportedly use to perform security sector reform include disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programmes to try and synchronize reforms to the security sector—and rule of law reforms as justice and security sectors are often considered intertwined. [22] [23] [12] Likewise, SSR can be performed along transitional justice processes if the security sector has a legacy of violence against the population—and during security policy discussions to use SSR in supporting the implementation and reviews of the states' national security policy and strategy. [23] [3] [4]

SSR is not understood by researchers to be limited to a single political situation, but rather can be introduced in various contexts. The circumstances under which reform efforts are undertaken are often classified as three different reform environments: post-conflict, transitional and developed countries. Nevertheless, security sector reform is most commonly introduced in post-conflict settings after war has ceased. [24] However, its insensitive application to such contexts has raised criticism. For example, Jane Chanaa has argued that there is a concept–context divide because conceptualisation overshadowed the understanding on how the idea adapts to the local situations whereas Safal Ghimire has noted that such a chasm exists also because the 'SSR' concept does not talk about reforms in the benefactors. [25] [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe</span> Security-oriented intergovernmental organization

The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) is a regional security-oriented intergovernmental organization comprising member states in Europe, North America, and Asia. Its mandate includes issues such as arms control, the promotion of human rights, freedom of the press, and free and fair elections. It employs around 3,460 people, mostly in its field operations but also in its secretariat in Vienna, Austria, and its institutions. It has observer status at the United Nations.

Governance is the overall complex system or framework of processes, functions, structures, rules, laws and norms borne out of the relationships, interactions, power dynamics and communication within an organized group of individuals which not only sets the boundaries of acceptable conduct and practices of different actors of the group and controls their decision-making processes through the creation and enforcement of rules and guidelines, but also manages, allocates and mobilizes relevant resources and capacities of different members and sets the overall direction of the group in order to effectively address its specific collective needs, problems and challenges. The concept of governance can be applied to social, political or economic entities such as a state and its government, a governed territory, a society, a community, a social group, a formal or informal organization, a corporation, a non-governmental organization, a non-profit organization, a project team, a market, a network or even the global stage. Governance can also pertain to a specific sector of activities such as land, environment, health, internet, security, etc. The degree of formality in governance depends on the internal rules of a given entity and its external interactions with similar entities. As such, governance may take many forms, driven by many different motivations and with many different results.

Disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR), or disarmament, demobilisation, repatriation, reintegration and resettlement (DDRRR) are strategies used as a component of peace processes, and is generally the strategy employed by all UN Peacekeeping Operations following civil wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peacebuilding</span> Nonviolent intervention to prevent conflict

Peacebuilding is an activity that aims to resolve injustice in nonviolent ways and to transform the cultural and structural conditions that generate deadly or destructive conflict. It revolves around developing constructive personal, group, and political relationships across ethnic, religious, class, national, and racial boundaries. The process includes violence prevention; conflict management, resolution, or transformation; and post-conflict reconciliation or trauma healing before, during, and after any given case of violence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peacebuilding Commission</span>

The United Nations Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) is a United Nations intergovernmental advisory body of both the General Assembly and the Security Council that supports peace efforts in conflict affected countries. A key addition to the capacity of the international community in the broad peace agenda, it was established in 2005 with the passage of both A/RES/60/180 and S/RES/1645 Mr. Sérgio França Danese (Brazil) is the incumbent chair of the PBC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DCAF</span> Security sector research foundation based in Geneva, Switzerland

DCAF- ; Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is an intergovernmental foundation-based think tank that provides research and project support to states and international actors in improving security sector governance and reform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alan Doss</span> British international civil servant

Alan Claude Doss is a British international civil servant who has spent his entire professional life in the service of the United Nations, working on peacekeeping, development and humanitarian assignments in Africa, Asia and Europe as well as at United Nations Headquarters in New York City.

Anthony Cleland Welch OBE is a UK-based former soldier, UN official, politician and academic who has contributed to the debate on security sector reform (SSR) and post-conflict development and regeneration. Welch adheres to the view that it is not enough to merely reform the armed forces, police and justice sector. In 2006 he led the Internal Security Sector review of Kosovo (ISSR) which established the grounds for the creation of a democratically administered, civilian-led security sector in the unilaterally declared independent Republic of Kosovo. The ISSR took the unusual step of asking the population of Kosovo to have their say on what made them feel insecure and was called by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), "…one of the most ambitious and holistic efforts at SSR undertaken in recent years, both in scope and methodology.".

The United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (PBF) is a multi-year standing trust fund for post-conflict peacebuilding, established in 2006 by the UN Secretary General at the request of the UN General Assembly with an initial funding target of $250 million.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Madrid Principles</span> 2009 proposed Nagorno-Karabakh peace settlements

The Madrid Principles were proposed peace settlements of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, proposed by the OSCE Minsk Group. The OSCE Minsk Group was the only internationally agreed body to mediate the negotiations for the peaceful resolution of the conflict prior to the renewed outbreak of hostilities in 2020. Senior Armenian and Azerbaijani officials had agreed on some of the proposed principles but made little or no progress towards the withdrawal of Armenian forces from occupied territories or towards the modalities of the decision on the future Nagorno-Karabakh status.

Promoting recovery from conflict is not limited to simply a humanitarian, security or development issue and often involves a combination of all three. Stabilization of fragile states is an approach and a process regarding the fragility and security of said states. Hence, stabilization is an essential concept in relation to fragile and failed states, where basic institutions and services are lacking and where conflict is an influential factor. OECD uses the term from fragility to resilient to describe the process of stabilization.

The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers is a set of principles for private military and security providers, created through a multi-stakeholder initiative convened by the Swiss government. This process involved and continuously involves representatives from private security companies, states, and civil society organizations. The code reinforces and articulates the obligations of private security providers particularly with regard to international humanitarian law and human rights law. The Code also sets the foundation for developing an institutional framework to provide oversight of and accountability to the Code. Accordingly, the stakeholders involved agreed on ‘Articles of Association’ setting up an oversight mechanism, the International Code of Conduct Association (ICoCA).

The End Human Trafficking Now (EHTN) campaign was founded in 2006 in an attempt at uniting the business world in combatting human trafficking and modern slavery.

The Kosovo Centre for Public Safety Education and Development (KCPSED), formerly the Kosovo Police Service School, is a training centre and education provider for the Kosovo Police, and for other public services in Kosovo. It is based in Vushtrri, 25 kilometers north of Pristina.

Gender and security sector reform is an emerging subfield of security sector reform (SSR) that is both practical and conceptual. SSR generally is a comprehensive framework within which all or part of a state's security sector undergoes a process of transformation in order to bring it more into line with principles such as democratic oversight, good governance and the rule of law. The overall objectives of SSR programmes – as defined both by the state in question and any international donors supporting the process – tend to include improving service delivery, enhancing local ownership and ensuring the sustainability of security sector institutions. As gender-specific approaches take into account the specific needs of men, women, boys and girls through gender mainstreaming and by promoting the equal participation of people of all genders in decision-making processes, states and international organisations increasingly consider them to be a necessary component of SSR programmes.

The Partnership for Peace Consortium is a network of over 800 defense academies and security studies institutes across 60 countries. Founded in 1998 during the NATO Summit, the PfPC was chartered to promote defense institution building and foster regional stability through multinational education and research, which the PfPC accomplishes via a network of educators and researchers. It is based at the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany. According to the PfPC Annual Report of 2012, in 2012 eight hundred defense academies and security studies institutes in 59 countries worked with the PfPC in 69 defense education/defense institution building and policy-relevant events. The Consortium publishes an academic quarterly journal CONNECTIONS in English and Russian. The journal is run by an international Editorial Board of experts and is distributed to over 1,000 institutions in 54 countries.

Funmi Olonisakin is a British Nigerian scholar, who is a Professor of leadership, peace and conflict at King's College London, and an Extra-Ordinary Professor at the University of Pretoria. She is the founder and former Director of the African Leadership Centre (ALC) founded on the principle of Pan-Africanism to build the next generation of leaders and scholars on the African continent with core transformational values. Olonisakin is the Programme Director of the ALC's Master of Science (MSc) programmes on Leadership, peace and security. She is a research associate of Political Sciences at the University of Pretoria, and was an Andrew Mellon Foundation distinguished scholar and a distinguished fellow of the Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP). She is currently an appointed member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) advisory group of experts. on the review of the UN Peace-building Architecture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thania Paffenholz</span>

Thania Paffenholz, is an academic and policy advisor working on peace processes. She is currently Director of Inclusive Peace. Thania Paffenholz has led comparative research of peace processes has contributed to peace processes in Mozambique, Angola, Somalia, Kenya, Uganda, South Sudan, Mali, Afghanistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Yemen, Egypt, El Salvador, Syria and Colombia. She received the Wihuri International Prize in 2015 for her work as a peace researcher.

The process of security sector governance and reform in the Philippines – which involves professionalizing, civilianizing, and modernizing/capacitating the Philippine government's security institutions to align them with ideals of good governance and with principles such as human rights, freedom of information, and the rule of civilian law – has been a continuing process since the establishment of the Fifth Philippine Republic after the 1986 People Power Revolution, before the concept had even been fully defined internationally in the 1990s.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Security Sector Governance: Applying the principles of good governance to the security sector (PDF). SSR Backgrounder Series. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-09-15.
  2. 1 2 Security System Reform and Governance. DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris: OECD DAC. 2005. ISBN   978-92-64-00786-4.
  3. 1 2 UN Security Council Resolution 2151 (S/RES/2151) on Security sector reform: challenges and opportunities. United Nations. 2014. Archived from the original on 2017-11-21.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Security Sector Reform: Applying the principles of good governance to the security sector (PDF). SSR Backgrounder Series. Geneva: DCAF. 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-09-13.
  5. Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security. Vienna: OSCE. 1994. p. 3. Archived from the original on 2017-08-29.
  6. Robinson, Colin D. "Rebuilding armies in southern Somalia: What currently should donors realistically aim for?." Conflict, Security & Development 21, no. 3 (2021): 329. The speech can be seen at https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20020824040451/http://www.dfid.gov.uk:80/News/Speeches/files/sp13may.html.
  7. 1 2 3 "Security Sector Reform". Folke Bernadotte Academy. Archived from the original on 2016-08-26. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
  8. Price, Megan; van Veen, Erwin (2014-08-19). "SSR: Securing its success, justifying its relevance". Clingendael. Archived from the original on 2017-08-26.
  9. "Unanimously Adopting Resolution 2151 (2014), Security Council Underscores Need for National Ownership of Security-Sector Reform". www.un.org. 2014-04-28. Archived from the original on 2017-08-20. Retrieved 2017-08-25.
  10. "UNDP sees Security Sector Reform as foundation for Peace and Development". UNDP. 2015-02-13. Archived from the original on 2017-08-26. Retrieved 2017-08-25.
  11. Elements for an EU-wide strategic framework to support security sector reform, JOIN(2016) 31 final (PDF). Strasbourg: European Commission. 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-25.
  12. 1 2 Security Sector Reform (PDF). USAID, US Departments of Defense and State. 2009.
  13. "About SSG/R". DCAF (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces). Archived from the original on 2017-11-07. Retrieved 2017-11-04.
  14. 1 2 3 The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform (SSR) - Supporting Security and Justice (PDF). Paris: OECD DAC. 2007. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-21.
  15. The United Nations SSR Perspective (PDF). New York: UN SSR Unit. 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-19.
  16. Securing peace and development: the role of the United Nations in supporting security sector reform - Report of the Secretary-General (A/62/659) (PDF). New York: United Nations. 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-09-05.
  17. "What is Good Governance?". United Nations ESCAP. 2009-06-10. Archived from the original on 2017-04-23. Retrieved 2017-04-09.
  18. Security Sector Governance and Reform: Guidelines for OSCE Staff. Vienna: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). 2016. Archived from the original on 2017-08-25.
  19. Weiss, Thomas G. (2000-10-01). "Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges". Third World Quarterly. 21 (5): 795–814. doi:10.1080/713701075. ISSN   0143-6597. S2CID   143243345.
  20. Weigand, Florian (2013). How can security sector reforms contribute to State-Building? The case of the Afghan Police Reform (PDF). London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09.
  21. International Security Forum 2016 (2016-06-13). "Security Sector Governance in West Africa: Regional norms, local experiences". www.isf2016.ch. Archived from the original on 2017-08-25. Retrieved 2017-05-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  22. "6.10 DDR and Security Sector Reform" (PDF). Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards. UN DDR Resource Centre. 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-11-23.
  23. 1 2 Cutter Patel, Ana (2010). Transitional Justice, DDR, and Security Sector Reform (PDF). International Center for Transitional Justice. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-11-07.
  24. Bryden, Alan; Hänggi, Heiner (2005). Security Governance in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). ISBN   978-3-8258-9019-3. Archived from the original on 2017-09-15.
  25. Chanaa, Jane (2002). Chanaa, Jane. "Adelphi Paper 344: Security Sector Reform: Issues, Challenges and Prospects." (2002) . New York: Oxford University Press for the International Institute for Strategic Studies. ISBN   9780198516743.
  26. Ghimire, Safal (March 2016). "Making security sector reform organic: infrastructures for peace as an entry point?". Peacebuilding. 4 (3): 262–281. doi:10.1080/21647259.2016.1156813. S2CID   156333204.

Further reading

Books

Articles, papers and guidelines

Organisations working on SSG/R or its subcategories