Siege of Belgrade (1456)

This article is about the 1456 siege of Belgrade. For other uses, see Siege of Belgrade.

Siege of Belgrade (Nándorfehérvár)
Part of the Ottoman wars in Europe Ottoman-Hungarian Wars
Ottoman miniature of the siege of Belgrade, 1456
Date 4–22 July 1456 Location Nándorfehérvár, (1427–1521) in Kingdom of Hungary (present-day Belgrade, Serbia) Result Hungarian and Serbian victory
Belligerents
Kingdom of Hungary Serbian Despotate	Ottoman Empire
Commanders and leaders
John Hunyadi Michael Szilágyi John of Capistrano Đurađ Branković	Mehmed II  (WIA) Zagan Pasha Mahmud Pasha Karaca Pasha   †
Strength
7,000 Castle defenders of Michael Szilágyi [1] [2] 10,000–12,000 Professional army of John Hunyadi (mostly cavalry) [3] [1] A motley army about 30,000–60,000 recruited Crusaders (with only some professional units) [4] [5] [1] 200 boats (only 1 galley) [2] [6] 40 boats from the city [2] Artillery [2]	30,000; [7] 60,000; [8] higher estimates of 100,000 [9] [10] 21–200 vessels [7] 300 cannons (22 large ones), 7 siege engines (2 mortars) [4]
Casualties and losses
Unknown	13,000 men [11] 200 galleys [3] 300 cannons [3]

The siege of Belgrade, or siege of Nándorfehérvár (Hungarian : Nándorfehérvár ostroma or nándorfehérvári diadal, lit. "Triumph of Nándorfehérvár"; Serbian Cyrillic : Опсада Београда, romanized: Opsada Beograda) was a military blockade of Belgrade that occurred 4–22 July 1456 in the aftermath of the fall of Constantinople in 1453 marking the Ottomans' attempts to expand further into Europe. Led by Sultan Mehmed II, the Ottoman forces sought to capture the strategic city of Belgrade (Hungarian: Nándorfehérvár), which was then under Hungarian control and was crucial for maintaining control over the Danube River and the Balkans.

The Hungarian defenders, under the leadership of John Hunyadi, who had garrisoned and strengthened the fortress city at his own expense, put up a determined resistance against the larger Ottoman army. The siege lasted for several weeks, during which both sides suffered heavy losses. The defenders used innovative tactics, including the use of heavy artillery and firearms, to repel the Ottoman assaults. Hunyadi's relief force destroyed a Turkish flotilla on 14 July 1456 before repulsing their large scale assault to capture the city on 21 July. Wounded Mehmed II was compelled to lift the siege and retreat on 22 July 1456. This victory boosted the morale of European Christian forces and was seen as a turning point in their efforts as it provided a crucial buffer and temporarily halted Ottoman expansion in Europe.

John Hunyadi's successful defence of Belgrade earned him widespread acclaim and respect as a military leader though he died of the plague a few weeks later. The Ottomans would continue their expansion in other directions, and the struggle between the Ottoman Empire and European powers persisted for centuries. The battle's significance also extended beyond its immediate aftermath, as it demonstrated the importance of firearms and artillery in warfare, heralding a new era in military technology and tactics.

Background

The Ottoman Empire, under the leadership of Sultan Mehmed II, had recently achieved a significant victory by capturing Constantinople in 1453, making it the new capital of the Ottoman Empire, thereby ending the Byzantine Empire. ^[12] The Ottomans became more ambitious in their expansionist aims, seeking to extend their influence further into Europe. They considered Belgrade, a strategically positioned fortress city at the confluence of the Danube and Sava river, as a crucial gateway for their advance northward. The Ottoman Empire's expansionist ambitions posed a significant challenge to the stability and security of European states, leading to a united effort to resist further Ottoman encroachment. ^[12] In 1452 former gubernátor John Hunyadi surrendered the regency to King Ladislas V, who came of age, and became Count of Besztercze and captain general of Hungary. ^[13]

Prelude

John Hunyadi, Regent-Governor of the Kingdom of Hungary (1446–1453)

After conducting two campaigns against the Serbian Despotate in 1454 and 1455, Sultan Mehmed decided to continue his conquests towards the northwest by capturing the strategically important city of Belgrade from the Kingdom of Hungary. Significant preparations were made by the Ottoman sultan for the conquest of the city, including the casting of 22 large cannons alongside many smaller ones and the establishment of a navy that would sail up the Danube to assist the army during the siege. ^[14] At the end of 1455, after receiving reports of the imminent Ottoman attack, Hunyadi began preparations of his own for the fortification of the Danube, informing the papal legate that he was ready to contribute, at his own expenses, 7,000 men in the fight against the Ottomans and asking for military assistance. ^[15] Hunyadi then armed the Belgrade fortress with 5,000 mercenaries that he placed under the command of his brother-in-law Mihály Szilágyi ^[16] and his own eldest son László. ^[13] Belgrade inhabitants came to help transporting the war machines. ^[16] Hunyadi then proceeded to form a relief army of 12,000. ^[12] In April 1456 general mobilisation was decreed following a Diet between the king and the noblemen. ^[16]

An Italian Franciscan friar allied to Hunyadi, Giovanni da Capistrano, sent as an inquisitor to Hungary to eliminate or convert so-called heretics, (non-Catholics) ^[17] started preaching a crusade to attract peasants and local countryside landlords to join the defence of Europe. ^[18] The crusaders numbering about 25,000 included an inexperienced peasant force of about 18,000 some of them carrying only clubs and slings. The recruits came under Hunyadi's banner, the core of which consisted of smaller bands of seasoned mercenaries and a few groups of minor knights. All in all, Hunyadi managed to build a force of 25–30,000 men. ^[12]

As the Ottoman army neared Belgrade, it passed through Sofia and proceeded towards the Danube, traversing the valley of Moravia. On 18 of June, it encountered a Serbian Army of approximately 9,000 soldiers, dispatched to halt the Ottoman progress. The smaller Serbian forces were utterly devastated and defeated by the advancing Ottoman troops; towards the end of the month the Ottomans appeared near Belgrade. ^[19]

Siege

Preparation

The Siege of Belgrade (Chronica Hungarorum, 1488)

Before Hunyadi could assemble his forces, the Ottoman troops from the army of Mehmed II (160,000 men in early accounts, 60–70,000 according to newer research) started appearing near Belgrade in the last days of June. ^[19]

Szilágyi could rely on a force of only 5,000–7,000 men in the castle. Mehmed set up his siege on the neck of the headland and started heavily bombarding the city's walls on July 4. He arrayed his men in three sections: The Rumelian corps had the majority of his 300 cannons, while his fleet of 200 river war vessels had the rest of them. The Rumelians were arrayed on the right wing and the Anatolian corps were arrayed on the left. In the middle were the personal guards of the Sultan, the Janissaries, and his command post. The Anatolian corps and the Janissaries were both heavy infantry troops. Mehmed posted his river vessels mainly to the northwest of the city to patrol the marshes and ensure that the fortress was not reinforced. They also kept an eye on the Sava river to the southwest to avoid the infantry from being outflanked by Hunyadi's army. The zone from the Danube eastwards was guarded by the Sipahi, the Sultan's feudal heavy cavalry corps, to avoid being outflanked on the right.

Part of Belgrade Fortress from the 17th century

When Hunyadi was informed of this, he was in the south of Hungary recruiting additional light cavalry troops for the army, with which he would intend to lift the siege. Although relatively few, his fellow nobles were willing to provide manpower, and the peasants were more than willing to do so. Capistrano, the Friar sent to Hungary by the Vatican both to find heretics and to preach a crusade against the Ottomans, managed to raise a large, albeit poorly trained and equipped, peasant army, with which he advanced towards Belgrade. Capistrano and Hunyadi travelled together though commanding the army separately. Both of them had gathered around 40,000–50,000 troops altogether. Once reports of the assembled relief army approaching reached the Ottoman camp, Mehmed held a war council with his generals to determine his army's next actions. ^[14] Karaca Pasha recommended that a part of Ottoman army should cross the Danube to counter the approaching relief force. ^[20] This proposal was rejected by the council, particularly due to opposition by the Rumelian begs. ^[14] Instead, the decision was made to prioritize capturing the city from its besieged defenders, a move seen as a tactical blunder by modern historians, as it allowed Hunyadi to set up camp across the river uncontested. ^{[20] [14]}

The outnumbered defenders relied mainly on the strength of the formidable castle of Belgrade, which was at the time one of the best engineered in the Balkans. Belgrade had been designated as the capital of the Serbian Despotate by Stefan Lazarević 53 years prior, in 1403-1404, and remained in Serbian hands until 1427, when it was returned to Hungarian king Sigismund. ^[21] The fortress was located on a hill and designed in an elaborate form with three lines of defence: the inner castle with the palace, a huge upper town with the main military camps, four gates and a double wall, as well as the lower town with the cathedral in the urban centre and a port at the Danube. This building endeavour was one of the most elaborate military architecture achievements of the Middle Ages as it also benefitted from the natural obstacle of the rivers being at the junction of the Danube and the Sava. ^[19] On 2 July Capistrano arrived at Belgrade. ^[22]

Naval battle

Fortress of Belgrade as it looked in the Middle Ages. The lower and upper town with the palace are visible.

Hunyadi established his camp in the vicinity of the Zemun fortress, while the Ottoman fleet encircled Belgrade along the Danube to put a stop to the provisioning of the city. ^[19] Hunyadi's primary objective was to secure the river passage to support and supply the besieged garrison. To achieve this, he commanded the assembly of all ships on the Danube and communicated with Szilágyi, instructing him to be prepared to launch an attack on the Ottoman fleet from a strategic position. Szilágyi readied around forty vessels, crewed by Serbians from the city. ^[19] The Ottoman Naval Flotilla facing them, depending on the source, was made up of 21 to as much as 200 vessels. ^[7]

On July 14, 1456, after 5 hours of battle on the river, Hunyadi broke the naval blockade sinking three large Ottoman galleys and capturing four large vessels and 20 smaller ones. By destroying the Sultan's fleet, Hunyadi was able to transport his troops and much-needed food into the city. The fort's defenders were also reinforced.

Ottoman assault

Sandor Wagner's The Self Sacrifice of Titusz Dugovics (1859) (a mythical Hungarian soldier who made a heroic act of self-sacrifice during the siege)

Infuriated by the failure on the Danube, Mehmed ordered his cannoneers to continuously fire upon the city walls, in preperation for a final offensive to take the city. ^[23] The defenders responded with fire of their own, managing to kill Karaca Pasha with a cannonball. ^[24] In the build-up to the general assault, the Ottomans launched small attacks each day, which were forcefully rejected. ^[24] The continueous bombardment resulted in several breaches opening on the walls of the fortress. On July 21 Mehmed launched an all-out assault that began at sundown and continued all night. The besieging army flooded the city and then started its assault on the fort. As this was the most crucial moment of the siege, Hunyadi ordered the defenders to throw tarred wood and other flammable material, and then set it afire. Soon a wall of flames separated the Janissaries fighting in the city from their fellow soldiers trying to breach through the gaps into the upper town. The battle between the encircled Janissaries and Szilágyi's soldiers inside the upper town was turning in favour of the Christians, and the Hungarians managed to beat off the fierce assault from outside the walls. The Janissaries remaining inside the city were thus massacred while the Ottoman troops trying to breach the upper town suffered heavy losses.

Final battle

Siege of Belgrade (in Hungarian: Nándorfehérvár) 1456. Hünername 1584

The next day, by some accounts, the peasant crusaders started a spontaneous action, and forced Capistrano and Hunyadi to make use of the situation. Despite Hunyadi's orders to the defenders not to try to loot the Ottoman positions, some of the units crept out from demolished ramparts, took up positions across from the Ottoman line, and began harassing enemy soldiers. Ottoman Sipahis tried without success to disperse the harassing force. At once, more defenders joined those outside the wall. What began as an isolated incident quickly escalated into a full-scale battle.

John of Capistrano at first tried to order his men back inside the walls, but soon found himself surrounded by about 2,000 peasant levymen. He then began leading them toward the Ottoman lines, crying, "The Lord who made the beginning will take care of the finish!" Capistrano led his crusaders to the Ottoman rear across the Sava river. At the same time, Hunyadi started a desperate charge out of the fort to capture the cannons in the Ottoman encampment.

The Christian counter offensive managed to gain significant ground against the Ottoman troops, eventually reaching as far as the Ottoman camp ^{[25] [26]} and capturing their artillery. ^{[24] [26]} At this crucial point of the battle, one of the viziers advised Mehmed to abandon the camp for his safety, which he refused to do so on the grounds that it would be a “sign of cowardice”. ^[25] After this, Mehmed personally joined the fighting, accompanied by two of his begs. ^[14] The Sultan managed to personally kill a number of enemy soldiers ^{[note 1]} before being injured, forcing him to abandon the battlefield. ^[23] The news of their Sultan fighting alongside them caused a morale boost amongst the Ottoman army, which allowed them to go on the offensive again and push the Christian forces out of the Ottoman camp. ^{[24] [25] [14]} The actions of the Sultan and the arrival of reinforcements had prevented a complete rout of the Ottoman army, ^{[26] [25] [14]} however, the army had been far too weakened to continue the siege, ^[14] and repeated Ottoman attempts at recapturing their cannons resulted in failure. ^[24] This led the Ottoman war council to decide on ending the siege. ^[14] During the night of July 22 to 23, the Ottomans buried their dead according to their customs, loaded their wounded in a long row of wagons, and evacuated the camp in a hurry, heading southeast. ^[24] The Christian forces weren't able to pursue after them. ^[27] The following day the crusader army entered the now abandoned Ottoman camp, finding immense loot left behind by the retreating Ottoman army. ^[24]

Aftermath

It is claimed that after the defeat, while he and his army were retreating into Bulgaria, the failure as well as the ensuing loss of no less than 24,000 of his best soldiers angered Mehmed in such a manner that, in an uncontrollable fit of fury, he wounded a number of his generals with his own sword, before ordering their executions. ^[28]

However, the Hungarians paid dearly for this victory. Plague broke out in the camp, from which John Hunyadi himself died three weeks later in Zimony, Hungary (later Zemun, Serbia) on 11 August 1456. ^[13] He was buried in the Cathedral of Gyulafehérvár (now Alba Iulia), the capital of Transylvania.

As the design of the fortress had proved its merits during the siege, some additional reinforcements were made by the Hungarians. The weaker eastern walls, where the Ottomans broke through into the upper town were reinforced by the Zindan Gate and the heavy Nebojša Tower. This was the last of the great modifications to the fortress until 1521, when Mehmed's great-grandson Suleiman eventually captured it.

Noon bell

Gothic fresco of the siege of Belgrade from 1468, in a church in Olomouc (Czech Republic). Probably the oldest depiction of the battle; shows Giovanni da Capistrano and John Hunyadi.

Pope Callixtus III ordered the bells of every European church to be rung every day at noon, as a call for believers to pray for the defenders of the city. ^{[29] [30]} The practice of the noon bell is traditionally attributed to the international commemoration of the victory at Belgrade and to the order of Pope Callixtus III, since in many countries (like England and the Spanish kingdoms) news of the victory arrived before the order, and the ringing of the church bells at noon was thus transformed into a commemoration of the victory. ^{[31] [32] [33]} The Pope did not withdraw the order, and Catholic and the older Protestant churches still ring the noon bell to this day. ^{[30] [32] [33] [34]}

As he had previously ordered all Catholic kingdoms to pray for the victory of the defenders of Belgrade, the Pope celebrated the victory by making an enactment to commemorate the day. This led to the legend that the noon bell ritual undertaken in Catholic and old Protestant churches, enacted by the Pope before the battle, was founded to commemorate the victory. ^[35] The day of the victory, July 22, has been a memorial day in Hungary ever since. ^[36]

This custom still exists also among Protestant and Orthodox congregations. In the history of the University of Oxford, the victory was welcomed with the ringing of bells and great celebrations in England. Hunyadi sent a special courier, Erasmus Fullar, among others to Oxford with the news of the victory. ^[37]

Legacy

Stone in the Kalemegdan Park, in Belgrade, with engraved inscription on the place where Christian forces under command of John Hunyadi won the battle against the Ottomans in 1456.

The victory stopped the Ottoman advance towards Europe beyond the Balkans for 70 years, though they made other incursions such as the taking of Otranto between 1480 and 1481; and the raid of Croatia and Styria in 1493. Belgrade would continue to protect Hungary from Ottoman attacks until the fort fell to the Ottomans in 1521.

After the siege of Belgrade stopped the advance of Mehmed II towards Central Europe, Serbia and Bosnia were absorbed into the Empire. Wallachia, the Crimean Khanate, and eventually Moldavia were merely converted into vassal states due to the strong military resistance to Mehmed's attempts of conquest. There were several reasons of why the Sultan did not directly attack Hungary and why he gave up the idea of advancing in that direction after his unsuccessful siege of Belgrade. The mishap at Belgrade indicated that the Empire could not expand further until Serbia and Bosnia were transformed into a secure base of operations. Furthermore, the significant political and military power of Hungary under Matthias Corvinus in the region surely influenced this hesitation too. Moreover, Mehmed was also distracted in his attempts to suppress insubordination from his Moldovan and Wallachian vassals.

With Hunyadi's victory at Belgrade, both Vlad III the Impaler and Stephen III of Moldavia came to power in their own domains, and Hunyadi himself went to great lengths to have his son Matthias placed on the Hungarian throne. While fierce resistance and Hunyadi's effective leadership ensured that the daring and ambitious Sultan Mehmed would only get as far into Europe as the Balkans, the Sultan had already managed to transform the Ottoman Empire into what would become one of the most feared powers in Europe (as well as in Asia) for centuries. Most of Hungary was eventually conquered in 1526 at the Battle of Mohács. Ottoman Muslim expansion into Europe continued with menacing success until the siege of Vienna in 1529, although Ottoman power in Europe remained strong and still threatening to Central Europe at times until the Battle of Vienna in 1683.

Literature and art

Battle of Nándorfehérvár, Hungarian painting from the 19th century. In the middle, Giovanni da Capistrano with the cross in his hand.

English poet and playwright Hannah Brand wrote a five-act tragedy about the battle and siege of Belgrade, which was first performed in 1791. ^[38] A fictional series about the siege from the viewpoint of a Christian mercenary is Christian Cameron's Tom Swan and the Siege of Belgrade, published from 2014 to 2015. ^[39]

Notes

1. Three per Tursun Beg, one per Laonikos Chalkokondyles

References

1. Tarján M., Tamás. "A nándorfehérvári diadal" [Triumph of Nándorfehérvár]. Rubicon (Hungarian Historical Information Dissemination) (in Hungarian).
2. Bánlaky, József. "Az 1456. évi országgyűlés határozatai. Események és intézkedések magyar részről Nándorfehérvár ostromának megkezdéséig." [Resolutions of the Parliament of 1456. Events and Measures on the Hungarian Side Until the Beginning of the Siege of Belgrade.]. A magyar nemzet hadtörténelme[The Military History of the Hungarian Nation] (in Hungarian). Budapest.
3. Tom R. Kovach (August 1996). "The 1456 Siege of Belgrade". Military History. 13 (3): 34. Retrieved March 6, 2015.
4. Bánlaky, József. "Nándorfehérvár ostroma" [The Siege of Belgrade]. A magyar nemzet hadtörténelme[The Military History of the Hungarian Nation] (in Hungarian). Budapest.
5. Kenneth M. Setton (1984). The Papacy and the Levant, 1204–1571, Vol. 3: The Sixteenth Century to the Reign of Julius III. p. 177. ISBN   978-0871691613.
6. Stanford J. Shaw (1976). History of the Ottoman Empire and modern Turkey, Volume 1, Empire of the Gazis: The Rise and Decline of the Ottoman Empire 1280–1808. p.  63. ISBN   978-0521291637.
7. Setton, Kenneth Meyer (1978). The Papacy and the Levant, 1204-1571. American Philosophical Society. pp. 173–175. ISBN   0-87169-127-2. Western contemporaries and some modern historians have reported, with much exaggeration, that more than 150,000 men had been mustered in the plains between Istanbul and Adrianople, and that the sultan had prepared a fleet of some two hundred river boats to be sent up the Danube and assembled at Vidin. A German source of late August, 1456, says, however, that Mehmed had no more than twenty-one ships! The ships were easier to count than the men. If Mehmed maintained as many as thirty thousand men at the siege of Belgrade, he did well.
8. André Clot, Mehmed the Conqueror, pp. 102–103
9. Andrew Ayton; Leslie Price (1998). "The Military Revolution from a Medieval Perspective". The Medieval Military Revolution: State, Society and Military Change in Medieval and Early Modern Society. London: I.B. Tauris. ISBN   1-86064-353-1. Archived from the original on November 12, 2010. Retrieved October 1, 2010.
10. John Julius Norwich (1982). A History of Venice. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1358. New York: Alfred B. Knopf. p. 269. ISBN   0-679-72197-5.
11. Housley 1992, p. 104.
12. Rogers, C.J.; Caferro, W.; Reid, S. (2010). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Medieval Warfare and Military Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 2-PA45. ISBN   978-0-19-533403-6.
13. Tucker, S.C. (2009). A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East [6 volumes]: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East. ABC-CLIO. ISBN   978-1-85109-672-5.
14. Türkmen, İlhan (January 5, 2015). "The Campaigns Against Serbia During the Reign of Mehmed the Conqueror per Ottoman Chronicles". Asia Minor Studies - International Journal of Social Sciences. 3 (5): 115–132 – via Dergipark. Fatih Belgrad'ı alabilmek için esaslı bir hazırlık yapmıştır. Morava nehri üzerindeki Krusevaç'ta toplar döktürüp bunları Tuna nehri kanalıyla Hırsova'ya yollamıştır ve burada Rumeli Beylerbeyi Dayı Karaca Paşa'ya teslim edilmiştir. Binlerce işçinin çalıştığı bu top dökümhanelerinde yapılan toplar arasında boyları 27 ayak olan 22 büyük top bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca iki yüz çektirmeden oluşan bir ince donanma su yoluyla gelebilecek yardımları engellemek maksadıyla Vidin'den Tuna'ya çıkmıştır... Ümitsizliğin arttığı bu sırada Hunyadi komutasında Tuna'nın öte yakasından bir Macar ordusunun toplandığı haberi gelmiştir... Bu gelişme üzerine Fatih gerekli tedbirleri görüşmek üzere harp meclisini toplamıştır. Mecliste Karaca Bey; bir kısım Osmanlı askerî gücünün Tuna'nın öbür yakasına Padişah geçmese bile kendisi ile gönderilmesi gerektiğini arz etmiştir. Bu suretle Macar güçleri ile Belgrad arasına Osmanlı askerî güçleri girmiş olacaktır. Böylece iki taraf arasındaki irtibat koparılmak istenmiştir. Fakat Karaca Paşa'nın mecliste ortaya attığı bu fikir diğer kumandanlar tarafından uygun görülmemiştir... Fakat şurası bir gerçek ki Karaca Paşa'nın teklifi reddedilmiştir. Burada Fatih'in düşman Tuna'nın öte yakasına gelmiş iken ve bunca askerlik tecrübesine rağmen bu fikre katılmaması da izahı zor bir konudur. Belki Padişah düşman kuvvetlerinin Tuna'nın beri tarafına geçebileceklerine ihtimal vermemiş veya Türk donanmasının bunu durdurabileceğini düşünmüştür... Fakat durum ne olursa olsun Hunyadi, ordusu ile serbestçe gelip Tuna'nın öbür tarafına ordusunu kurmuştur... Surların dışında da şiddetli bir savaş başlamıştır. Türklerin bir hilesinden endişe eden Hunyadi dışarıdaki kuvvetlerine yerlerinden ayrılmamalarını emretmiştir. Fakat bu kuvvetler Türk tarafına doğru bir hücuma geçmiştir. Fatih düşmanı meydana çekerek imha etmek maksadıyla kale dibindeki askerlerin geri çekilmesi emrini verir. Böylece düşman kuvvetleri Türk ordugahına doğru çekilecek ve imha edilecektir. Fakat Hunyadi Fatih'in bu stratejisini anlayarak hemen ordusunun imdadına yetişmiştir... Durum her ne olursa olsun düşman kuvvetleri Türk ordugahına doğru ilerlemeye başlamışlardır. Kritovulos Belgrad müdafilerinin Türk toplarının yanına kadar gelerek ordugahı yağmaladıklarını anlatmaktadır. Ordugahın yağmalanmasının Fatih'in ileri atılıp saldırmasıyla engellediğini nakletmektedir. Vezirler Sultana ordugahı terk etmesini ve emin bir yere çekilmesini telkin ettiler, fakat Fatih Sultan Mehmed "Düşmenden yüz döndürmek sıngun nişanudur..." diyerek düşmanın bu hali karşısında bizzat öne atılarak düşmana hücum etmiştir. Böylece Osmanlılar ordugaha hücum eden öndeki düşman kuvvetlerini geri püskürttüler ve kılıçtan geçirdiler... İleri atılan bu kahraman Osmanlı padişahının bir yanında Özgüroglu İsa Bey, bir yanında da İshak Beyoğlu İsa Bey vardır. Padişah üzerine gelen birkaç kişiyi öldürmeye muvaffak olmuştur. Tam bu sırada alnından ve dizinden yaralanmıştır... Fatih'in düşman ordusunun üzerine atılması ve cesareti büyük bir bozgunu önlemiştir. Yeniden toparlanan ordu tekrar taarruza geçmiştir. Bu arada padişah bin bir güçlükle ikna edilip tehlikeli bölgeden uzaklaştırılmıştır. Türk ordusu da bir hayli yıpranmış ve kayıp vermiştir. Türk ordusunun yıpranması ve Belgrad'ın bu şartlar altında alınamayacağı harp meclisinde münakaşa ve müzakere edilerek muhasaranın kaldırılmasına karar verilmiştir. Böylece Osmanlı ordusu muhasarayı kaldırarak geri dönmüştür.
15. Muresanu & Treptow 2018, p. 211.
16. Muresanu & Treptow 2018, p. 214.
17. Housley 2012, p. 30.
18. Muresanu & Treptow 2018, p. 213.
19. Muresanu & Treptow 2018, p. 218.
20. Tansel, Selahattin (1953). Osmanlı Kaynaklarına Göre Fatih Sultan Mehmed'in Siyasi ve Askeri Faaliyeti[Mehmed the Conqueror's Political and Military Activity per Ottoman Sources] (in Turkish). Türk Tarih Kurumu. pp. 122–123. ISBN   9789751610812. Tuna'nın öte yakasında Macar ordusunun toplanmaya başlandığı duyuldu. Bu kuvvetler Hunyadi'nin idaresi altında idi . Sayıları 60.000'i geçen bu kuvvetler Peterwardein'i geçmiş bulunuyorlardı. Bunun üzerine padişah alınacak tedbirleri görüşmek üzere bir meclis topladı. Bu mecliste Karaca Bey çok enteresan bir fikir ortaya attı. Ona göre göre Tuna'nın öbür yakasına geçilerek Macarlarla çarpışmak en salim bir yoldu; padişah karşıya geçmese bile kendisinin bir kısım kuvvetlerle oraya gönderilmesi zaruri idi... Karaca Bey'in fikirlerine daha çok itiraz edenler Rumeli beyleri idi... Nihayet Karaca Bey'in fikrine muhalif olanlara padişah da katıldığı için Karaca'nın ileriye sürdüğü tez reddedildi... Karaca Bey'in mütalâalarına değer verilmediği için Macar ordusu serbestçe gelip Tuna'nın öbür tarafına ordugah kurdu.
21. Ćirković 2004, p. 89, 102.
22. Muresanu & Treptow 2018, p. 219.
23. Babinger, Franz (2003). Fatih Sultan Mehmed ve Zamanı[Mehmed the Conqueror and His Times] (in Turkish). Oğlak Yayıncılık. pp. 132–137. ISBN   975-329-417-4.
24. Mureșanu, Camil (2021). John Hunyadi: Defender of Christendom. Histria Books. pp. 221–224. ISBN   978-1-59211-115-2. The Ottoman cannons fired incessantly at the fortress... The defenders shot a flight of arrows at the Ottoman soldiers who were busy preparing for the general assault. They were constantly firing their cannons as well. Each day, the Ottomans launched small attacks, which were forcefully rejected. A cannonball killed Tadji Karadja, the beylerbey of Rumelia, who was in direct command of the siege. This incident demoralized the soldiers in the Rumelian army... Mehmed II decided to call for a general assault on July 21... The reinforcements that kept coming across the Sava allowed, toward evening, the launching of a counterattack that repelled the Ottomans completely. The city was reconquered, the janissaries ran back to the cannons where they had started a few hours earlier. The battle continued after dark, but Hunyadi gave orders to halt the pursuit, thus giving the troops time to rest. At the break of dawn on July 22 things remained quiet. But gradually battle began again. Animated by the victory of the previous day and evening, the Christian troops could not be restrained. Without waiting for any orders, the people's detachments began to harass the Ottomans, engaging in isolated confrontations with units of Ottoman cavalry. The battle quickly gained proportion. The entire camp of crusaders crossed the Sava and rushed upon the armies from Anatolia. At that time, John Hunyadi was near the ships. Seeing that the army could not be stopped from the struggle it had begun, he decided to intervene with his troops, scattered inside the fortress and throughout the city. A general attack broke out against the Ottoman camp. The cannons of the sultan were captured and turned against the Ottomans who fled. The janissaries, however, were still fighting vigorously. Mehmed II, although wounded by an arrow in his calf, stayed among them... Mehmed repelled the troops that had penetrated into his camp and ordered that the cannons be recovered at any price. The Ottomans attacked three times, but the deadly fire they confronted vanquished them... The sultan and the troops around him resisted in their camp until evening. During the night of July 22 to 23, the Ottomans buried their dead according to their custom, loaded their wounded in a long row of wagons, and evacuated the camp in a hurry, heading southeast. The victorious army entered the Ottoman camp. They found immense loot there, left behind by the retreating Ottoman army.
25. Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı (2019). Osmanlı Tarihi Cilt II[History of the Ottomans Volume II] (in Turkish). Türk Tarih Kurumu. pp. 15–18. ISBN   9789751600127. Kara tarafındaki hendeği doldurmuş olan Türk muhasara kuvvetleri şiddetli bir hücum neticesinde Belgrad'a girdikleri sırada diğer taraftan da şehrin yardımına yetişen Jan Hunyadi içeri girmiş ve iki taraf arasında şiddetli bir mücadele olmuştu. Jan Hunyadi, Türk kuvvetlerinin dağınıklığından istifade ile ansızın üzerlerine atılarak onları bozmuş ve daha sonra Osmanlı karargâhına kadar hücumu ilerletmişti; bu tehlikeli anda vezirlerden biri bir zarar gelmemesi için padişahın karargahı terk etmesini teklif etti ise de Sultan Mehmed "Düşmandan yüz döndürmek sıngın nişanıdır" yani bozgunculuk alâmetidir sözleriyle bu teklifi reddetmiş ve üzerine hücum eden üç düşmanı bizzat kendi eliyle öldürmüştür. Bu sırada cesareti artan asker ve zamanında yetişen süvari kuvvetleri mukabil taarruzla düşmanı karargahtan çıkarmağa muvaffak olmuşlardır; bu savaş esnasında Sultan Mehmed kalçasından yaralanmıştır. Fatih Sultan Mehmed'in karargaha hücum eden düşmana karşı gösterdiği sebat ve mukavemet korkunç bir bozgunu önlemiş ve sonu belki de büyük bir Haçlı Seferi vücuda getirebilecek olan tehlikeyi bertaraf etmiştir; bu mücadelede düşman da fazlaca yıpranmış olduğundan çekilmiş ve Osmanlı kuvvetleri bu seferden başarısız dönmüşlerdir.
26. Mixson, James (2022). The Crusade of 1456: Texts and Documentation in Translation. University of Toronto Press. p. 26. ISBN   978-1-4875-3262-8. They were soon able to break through the many gaps in the walls that had been opened up by the cannons. In part their advance may have been possible because Hunyadi had deliberately withdrawn to the citadel that Stefan Lazarević had refurbished decades before. From there the garrison's defenders launched a counterattack that drove the Ottomans from the Upper Town. The fighting among the ruined walls was fierce - as Hunyadi later recalled, in an oft-repeated line, it unfolded "not in a fortress, but in a field" - and seems to have lasted well into the next day. Mehmed and his generals soon realized that the city would not fall so easily, and they changed tactics. The sultan ordered a feigned retreat, hoping to draw the defenders out for a battle in the open field. It was a tactic Hunyadi knew well, and he ordered his troops to hold back. Capistrano's followers, though, seem not to have known, or not to have cared. They advanced across the Sava, by some accounts under Capistrano's direction, and began pillaging the abandoned Ottoman positions. A full counterattack soon erupted. Whether by accident or by design, the end result was the same: Belgrade's defenders captured the Ottoman artillery positions and drove the sultan's troops all the way back to his own tents. There, again, Mehmed himself is said by at least some accounts to have been wounded, and to have killed many with his own hands. Reinforcements soon arrived to prevent a total rout, but by nightfall the conqueror of Constantinople had been forced to retreat.
27. Nicolae, Jorga (2018). Büyük Türk - Fatih Sultan Mehmed (in Turkish). Yeditepe Yayınevi. p. 95. ISBN   9786052070383.
28. Radu R Florescu; Raymond T. McNally (1989). Dracula, Prince of Many Faces: His Life and His Times. Little, Brown. p.  80. ISBN   978-0-316-28655-8.
29. Thomas Henry Dyer (1861). The history of modern Europe: From the fall of Constantinople. J. Murray. p.  85. Noon bell belgrade.
30. István Lázár: Hungary: A Brief History (see in Chapter 6)
31. Kerny, Terézia (2008). "The Renaissance – Four Times Over. Exhibitions Commemorating Matthias's Accession to the Throne". The Hungarian Quarterly. Budapest, Hungary: Society of the Hungarian Quarterly. pp. 79–90. On July 22, 1456, John Hunyadi won a decisive victory at Belgrade over the armies of Sultan Mehmed II. Hunyadi's feat—carried out with a small standing army combined with peasants rallied to fight the infidel by the Franciscan friar St John of Capistrano—had the effect of putting an end to Ottoman attempts on Hungary and Western Europe for the next seventy years. The bells ringing at noon throughout Christendom are, to this day, a daily commemoration of John Hunyadi's victory.
32. "John Hunyadi: Hungary in American History Textbooks".
33. "Welcome to nginx eaa1a9e1db47ffcca16305566a6efba4!185.15.56.1". nq.oxfordjournals.org. Archived from the original on July 17, 2012. Retrieved February 3, 2022.
34. Kerny, Terézia (2008). "The Renaissance – Four Times Over. Exhibitions Commemorating Matthias's Accession to the Throne". The Hungarian Quarterly. Budapest, Hungary: Society of the Hungarian Quarterly. pp. 79–90. On July 22, 1456, John Hunyadi won a decisive victory at Belgrade over the armies of Sultan Mehmed II. Hunyadi's feat—carried out with a small standing army combined with peasants rallied to fight the infidel by the Franciscan friar St John of Capistrano—had the effect of putting an end to Ottoman attempts on Hungary and Western Europe for the next seventy years, and is considered to have been one of the most momentous victories in Hungarian military history. The bells ringing at noon throughout Christendom are, to this day, a daily commemoration of John Hunyadi's victory.
35. "Hunyadi and the noon bell ritual". Daily News Hungary. November 9, 2015.
36. Anniversary of 1456 victory over Ottomans becomes memorial day politics.hu
37. Imre Lukinich: A History of Hungary in Biographical Sketches (p. 109.) ^{[ ISBN missing ]}
38. Hüttler, Michael (2013). "Theatre and Cultural Memory: The siege of Belgrade on Stage". Open Access Research Journal for Theatre, Music, Arts. 2 (1/2): 1–13.
39. "The Siege of Belgrade 1456, or why is history so complicated?". christiancameronauthor.com. March 25, 2015. Retrieved August 24, 2020.

Bibliography

• Andrić, Stanko (2016). "Saint John Capistran and Despot George Branković: An Impossible Compromise". Byzantinoslavica. 74 (1–2): 202–227.
• Andrew Ayton; Leslie Price (1998). The Medieval Military Revolution: State, Society and Military Change in Medieval and Early Modern Society. London: I.B. Tauris. ISBN   1-86064-353-1. Archived from the original on November 12, 2010. Retrieved October 1, 2010.
• Ćirković, Sima (2004). The Serbs. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
• John Julius Norwich (1982). A History of Venice. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1358. New York: Alfred B. Knopf. ISBN   0-679-72197-5.
• Muresanu, C.; Treptow, L. (2018). John Hunyadi: Defender of Christendom. Histria Books. ISBN   978-1-59211-115-2.
• Stanford J. Shaw (1976). History of the Ottoman Empire and modern Turkey, Volume 1, Empire of the Gazis: The Rise and Decline of the Ottoman Empire 1280–1808 . ISBN   978-0-521-29163-7.
• Housley, Norman (1992). The Later Crusades, 1274–1580: From Lyons to Alcazar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Housley, Norman (2002). Religious Warfare in Europe 1400-1536. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Housley, Norman (2012). Crusading and the Ottoman Threat, 1453–1505. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Thomas Henry Dyer (1861). The history of modern Europe: From the fall of Constantinople. J. Murray. p.  85. Noon bell belgrade.
• Setton, Kenneth M. (1984). The Papacy and the Levant (1204–1571), Volume III: The Sixteenth Century to the Reign of Julius III. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society. ISBN   0-87169-161-2.
• Peter R. Biasiotto (1943). History of the Development of the Devotion to the Holy Name.
• Visy, Zsolt (2024). Visy, Zsolt: A déli harangszó Magyarországon és a nagyvilágban – The Noon Bellin Hungary and the world. Professzorok Batthyány Köre – GeniaNet kiadó. ISBN   978-615-5687-08-2.

Further reading

• Mixson, J.D. (2022). The Crusade of 1456: Texts and Documentation in Translation. University of Toronto Press. ISBN   978-1-4875-2393-0.