Solidarity Federation

Last updated

Solidarity Federation
AbbreviationSF or SolFed
Established
  • 1950;74 years ago (1950) (as SWF)
  • 1979;45 years ago (1979) (as DAM)
  • 1994;30 years ago (1994) (as SF)
Type Political organisation
Headquarters Manchester
Location
Membership (2016)
250
PublicationDirect Action
Affiliations International Workers' Association
Website solfed.org.uk
Formerly called
  • Syndicalist Workers Federation (until 1979)
  • Direct Action Movement (until 1994)

The Solidarity Federation (SF; SolFed) is a British anarcho-syndicalist political organisation. It advocates for the abolition of capitalism and the state through industrial action, which it agitates for in industrial networks and local groups.

Contents

Originally established as the Syndicalist Workers Federation (SWF) in 1950, it became the British section of the International Workers' Association (IWA). In 1979, it reorganised into the Direct Action Movement (DAM), which participated in a number of industrial disputes during the 1980s and organised a short-lived couriers' union. Splits of anarchist communists from the organisation preceded its reorganisation into the Solidarity Federation, which it took the form of in 1994.

History

Background

During the Spanish Civil War, many British anarchists moved towards anarcho-syndicalism and formed syndicalist organisations to support the Spanish National Confederation of Labour (CNT). [1] After the defeat of the Spanish anarchists in the war, the British anarchist movement attempted to reorganise itself, culminating in the establishment of the Anarchist Federation of Britain (AFB), which included anarchists of various different tendencies. [2]

Syndicalist Workers Federation

By the end of World War II, syndicalists had risen to the leadership of the AFB, causing a split in the organisation. [3] In August 1950, [4] the syndicalists that were left over in the AFB reorganised into the Syndicalist Workers Federation (SWF). [5] The SWF affiliated itself to the International Workers' Association (IWA), a syndicalist political international, as the organisation's British section. [4] The SWF was broadly syndicalist in orientation, rather than specifically anarcho-syndicalist. [4] Many of the initial members of the SWF were pacifists, who rejected violence as a means of class conflict. [6]

The SWF experienced a period of growth through the 1950s and 1960s. [4] In 1965, an estimated 150 syndicalists were organising in Britain; 100 were affiliated with the exiled CNT and 50 with the SWF. [7] During the late 1970s, the structures of the SWF began to change under the influence of new members, who had filtered into the organisation from the punk subculture. [8] By the end of the decade, it only had one remaining local branch, located in Manchester. [4]

Direct Action Movement

In March 1979, [9] the remaining members of the SWF reorganised themselves into the Direct Action Movement (DAM), [10] which experienced a period of growth throughout the early 1980s. [8] The DAM initially sought support from the international syndicalist movement, but its organisational capacity was weak and British trade unionism was comparatively strong, so it was only capable of supporting existing industrial unions in Britain. [11] Although the successor to an older organisation, the DAM themselves acknowledged that "syndicalism in this country has not really existed since the early 1920s." [9] Its Direct Action magazine, initially edited in the cut-and-paste style of a punk fanzine, took a more serious and professional editorial style when reporting on the industrial disputes of the 1980s. [9]

The DAM supported the miners' strike of 1984-1985, [12] which it recognised as a movement directed by the union rank-and-file, in spite of its own criticisms of the authoritarian politics of NUM leader Arthur Scargill. [13] The DAM raised funds for miners' support groups, protested on picket lines and organised a congress to encourage solidarity actions from workers in other industrial sectors. [14] One member of the DAM, the Doncaster-based Dave Douglass, was one of the few striking miners that self-identified as an anarchist; he was also critical of the NUM leadership and organised direct actions to "improve the effectiveness of the miners' strike". [15] In 1985, the DAM co-founded Anti-Fascist Action, within which it was active into the 1990s. [16] The DAM later participated in the opposition to the poll tax and the protests against it. [17]

In the late 1980s, the DAM began attempting to establish its own anarcho-syndicalist unions as an alternative to the reformist unions. [18] Its only success on this front was the establishment of the Dispatch Industry Workers Union (DIWU), which organised delivery couriers from 1989 to 1992. [18] This change in policy provoked a number of splits from the organisation, as some members thought all unions were inherently reformist, even if they were anarcho-syndicalist in orientation. [19] In 1986, the group Syndicalist Fight (SyF) split off and later merged into the Anarchist Communist Federation (ACF); and in 1987, the Anarchist Workers Group (AWG) split off and later merged into the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP). [20]

Solidarity Federation

In 1994, the remnants of the DAM reorganised into the Solidarity Federation (SF), which adopted a new strategy. [21] Rather than attempting to establish independent anarcho-syndicalist unions, the SF instead seeks to create networks of workers within existing unions, [22] with the intention of participating in workplace struggles and propagandising for anarcho-syndicalism. [23] After its formation, the SF became the British section of the IWA. [24] It also took over publication of the magazine Direct Action, [25] which was previously published by the DAM. [26]

Campaigns

SolFed End Unpaid Work 2012 campaign logo End Unpaid Work.png
SolFed End Unpaid Work 2012 campaign logo

SolFed has carried out a series of direct action campaigns within the industries its members work in. One SolFed member, working within the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT), organised a "workmates experience" campaign in the London Underground, where they organised against outsourcing and built solidarity between union and non-union workers. At Brighton University, SolFed established a "pop-up union" to organise precarious workers, despite the opposition of the University and College Union (UCU). [17]

SolFed has formed close ties with the British branch of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) and the two frequently collaborate, [27] despite ideological and organisational differences. [28] In Nottingham, the local SolFed group has participated in the Nottingham Association of Subversive Activists (NASA). [29] On International Workers' Day, in 2000, SolFed participated in an anti-capitalist demonstration in London, during which a statue of Winston Churchill was vandalised. [30] Following the rise of far-right politics in the United Kingdom in the 21st century, SolFed rejected working with Unite Against Fascism, which it criticised for "class collaboration", and instead called for anti-fascism to be carried out through class struggle. [16] This culminated in the early 2010s, SolFed supported the establishment of the Anti-Fascist Network, formed to provide an organised anarchist opposition to the English far-right. [31]

Solidarity Federation's 2012 national campaign against workfare initially focused specifically on Holland and Barrett, a health supplement corporation making use of placements staffed by unpaid benefits claimants. On 5 July 2012, after a sustained series of pickets at Holland and Barrett stores across the UK, the company announced via social media and its website that it was pulling out of the workfare scheme, citing negative publicity. [32] [33]

In October 2013, Brighton SolFed launched its Hospitality Workers Campaign, which aimed to bring together hospitality workers facing precarity and encourage solidarity and mutual aid between them. [17] The campaign attracted support from the city's Spanish migrant workers, many of whom worked in hospitality or healthcare for low pay and in poor working conditions. [34] SolFed interviewed hospitality workers in order to identify abusive employers and inform them of their rights as workers in the UK. Workers were also provided with legal representation and encouraged to take industrial action. [35] The campaign attracted significant support from hospitality workers, who for the most part were not unionised. [36]

In 2013, SolFed members in Liverpool participated in the People's Assembly Against Austerity, but they later expressed disappointment with the experience, reporting that it had consisted largely of speeches without any organisation of political action. [37] The following year, they collaborated with members of the Left Unity party to organise social centres, International Women's Day events and political demonstrations against austerity. [38]

Organisation

The Solidarity Federation is organised into industrial networks and local groups. [39] SolFed has a federal structure, based on decentralised and autonomous groups, which it sees as both a means and an end. [40] Following the organisational principles of anarcho-syndicalism, SolFed upholds participatory decision-making, in which individuals have the right to self-determination and decisions are driven by popular consensus. [41] Members of SolFed are required to pay dues, which enables them to elect local representatives and a secretariat. [42] SolFed opposes participation in political parties, as exemplified in its slogan "The union not party". [43] Unlike other anarcho-syndicalist organisations, SolFed is not itself a trade union, but rather a political organisation dedicated to the promotion of self-organisation and class consciousness. [17]

Its industrial networks are organised as non-hierarchical and federal structures, which they intend to act as a synecdoche of post-capitalist social structures. [43] This practice reflects a prefigurative politics, in which SolFed seeks to build "a new society within the shell of the old"; [44] although unlike other anarcho-syndicalists, who see their own organisations as a prefiguration of a post-capitalist society, SolFed has resisted characterising itself as a universal form for organising society. [45] Through its industrial networks, SolFed has organised in several economic sectors, including in the communication, education, public administration and transportation sectors. [46]

Although their primary focus is on organising industrial workers, in the 21st century, SolFed has increasingly emphasised other forms of organising outside the setting of the workplace. [47] SolFed has established a number of local organisations, which engage in community organising and social activism, alongside support for workplace activities. [48] By the 2010s, SolFed counted 10 local groups, with 4 more locals in formation. [49] It is relatively small organisation, with only a few hundreds members; [17] as of 2015, it claimed to have 200 members. [42]

SolFed refuses to pay for professional union officials, as it believes their interests would become separate from those of the rank-and-file and therefore make them more likely to seek compromises with employers. [50] All official positions in the SF, whether taking minutes, chairing meetings or negotiating with other organisations, are temporary and unpaid positions, in order to keep their interests in line with that of the rank-and-file. [41]

Ideology

The Solidarity Federation advocates for solidarity, which it views as a means for workers' empowerment. [51] SolFed believes that profit-seeking is the main cause of the exploitation of labour, political repression and economic inequality. [52] As anarcho-syndicalists, SolFed considers the workplace to be the venue best suited for class conflict and favours the organisation of workers into industrial unions. [53] SolFed's preferred tactics include various different direct actions, from strike actions to workplace occupations and sabotage. [54]

SolFed seeks short-term improvements to working conditions, [17] and in the long-term, desires the abolition of the state and capitalism. [55] They ultimately advocate for the establishment of an industrial economy based on workers' self-management, in which individual needs are prioritised over profit. [56] SolFed considers the general strike to be a means to achieve such a social revolution. [57]

In a break from traditional anarcho-syndicalism, which upholds "strategic centralism", SolFed argues for a diversity of tactics in order to oppose all forms of oppression and hierarchical power. [58] While agitating against economic oppression, SolFed also proposes the establishment of localised organisations to oppose other forms of oppression, including environmental degradation, sexism, racism and homophobia. [59] SolFed is also opposed to existing institutions of mass media, which it considers to be a mouthpiece for the ruling class, and has called instead for the establishment of independent media. [60]

As a means to achieve workers' self-management, SolFed historically preferred workplace occupations over strike actions; they believed that in order to deny the managerial class access to the workplace, the workers themselves would be required to have a higher level of solidarity and cohesive self-organisation than any strike action. [61] In his book Rebel Alliances , historian Benjamin Franks criticised this argument against strike actions, which he said constituted a "hierarchy of industrial action, which freezes methods according to their predetermined position". [62]

Related Research Articles

Anarchist communism is a political ideology and anarchist school of thought that advocates communism. It calls for the abolition of private property but retention of personal property and collectively-owned items, goods, and services. It supports social ownership of property and the distribution of resources "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Syndicalism</span> Form of revolutionary organisation

Syndicalism is a revolutionary current within the labour movement that, through industrial unionism, seeks to unionize workers according to industry and advance their demands through strikes, with the eventual goal of gaining control over the means of production and the economy at large through social ownership. Developed in French labor unions during the late 19th century, syndicalist movements were most predominant amongst the socialist movement during the interwar period that preceded the outbreak of World War II.

Anarcho-syndicalism is an anarchist organisational model that centres trade unions as a vehicle for class conflict. Drawing from the theory of libertarian socialism and the practice of syndicalism, anarcho-syndicalism sees trade unions as both a means to achieve immediate improvements to working conditions and to build towards a social revolution in the form of a general strike, with the ultimate aim of abolishing the state and capitalism. Anarcho-syndicalists consider trade unions to be the prefiguration of a post-capitalist society and seek to use them in order to establish workers' control of production and distribution. An anti-political ideology, anarcho-syndicalism rejects political parties and participation in parliamentary politics, considering them to be a corrupting influence on the labour movement. In order to achieve their material and economic goals, anarcho-syndicalists instead practice direct action in the form of strike actions, boycotts and sabotage. Anarcho-syndicalists also attempt to build solidarity among the working class, in order to unite workers against the exploitation of labour and build workers' self-management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarchist Federation (Britain)</span> Anarchist federation in Great Britain

The Anarchist Federation is a federation of anarcho-communists in Great Britain. It is not a political party, but a direct action, agitational and propaganda organisation.

The International Workers' Association – Asociación Internacional de los Trabajadores (IWA–AIT) is an international federation of anarcho-syndicalist labor unions and initiatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Confederation of Labour (Spain)</span> Spanish trade union

The General Confederation of Labour is a Spanish trade union federation. Formed as a faction of the National Confederation of Labour (CNT) during the Spanish transition to democracy, its support for participation in union elections led it to split from the organisation, which prohibited participation. After losing a lengthy legal battle for the name, the pro-electoral faction renamed itself to the CGT and reorganised itself as an independent trade union center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarchism in the United Kingdom</span>

Anarchism in the United Kingdom initially developed within the religious dissent movement that began after the Protestant Reformation. Anarchism was first seen among the radical republican elements of the English Civil War and following the Stuart Restoration grew within the fringes of radical Whiggery. The Whig politician Edmund Burke was the first to expound anarchist ideas, which developed as a tendency that influenced the political philosophy of William Godwin, who became the first modern proponent of anarchism with the release of his 1793 book Enquiry Concerning Political Justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Front</span> Political party in South Africa

The Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Front, formerly known as the Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Federation (ZabFed), is a platformist–especifista anarchist political organisation in South Africa, based primarily in Johannesburg. The word zabalaza means "struggle" or "active rebellion" in isiZulu, isiXhosa, siSwati and isiNdebele. Initially, as ZabFed, it was a federation of pre-existing collectives, mainly in Soweto and Johannesburg. It is now a unitary organisation based on individual applications for membership, describing itself as a "federation of individuals". Historically the majority of members have been people of colour. Initially the ZACF had sections in both South Africa and Swaziland. The two sections were split in 2007, but the Swazi group faltered in 2008. Currently the ZACF also recruits in Zimbabwe. Members have experienced oppression in South Africa and Swaziland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarchism in Africa</span>

Anarchism in Africa refers both to purported anarchic political organisation of some traditional African societies and to modern anarchist movements in Africa.

The Japanese Anarchist Federation was an anarchist organisation that existed in Japan from 1946 to 1968.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarchism in Sweden</span>

Anarchism in Sweden first grew out of the nascent social democratic movement during the later 19th century, with a specifically libertarian socialist tendency emerging from a split in the movement. As with the movements in Germany and the Netherlands, Swedish anarchism had a strong syndicalist tendency, which culminated in the establishment of the Central Organisation of the Workers of Sweden (SAC) following an aborted general strike. The modern movement emerged during the late 20th century, growing within a number of countercultural movements before the revival of anarcho-syndicalism during the 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarchism in Ireland</span>

Anarchism in Ireland has its roots in the stateless organisation of the tuatha in Gaelic Ireland. It first began to emerge from the libertarian socialist tendencies within the Irish republican movement, with anarchist individuals and organisations sprouting out of the resurgent socialist movement during the 1880s, particularly gaining prominence during the time of the Dublin Socialist League.

Anarchism in Japan began to emerge in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as Western anarchist literature began to be translated into Japanese. It existed throughout the 20th century in various forms, despite repression by the state that became particularly harsh during the two world wars, and it reached its height in the 1920s with organisations such as Kokuren and Zenkoku Jiren.

Contemporary anarchism within the history of anarchism is the period of the anarchist movement continuing from the end of World War II and into the present. Since the last third of the 20th century, anarchists have been involved in anti-globalisation, peace, squatter and student protest movements. Anarchists have participated in armed revolutions such as in those that created the Makhnovshchina and Revolutionary Catalonia, and anarchist political organizations such as the International Workers' Association and the Industrial Workers of the World have existed since the 20th century. Within contemporary anarchism, the anti-capitalism of classical anarchism has remained prominent.

A general strike is a strike action in which participants cease all economic activity, such as working, to strengthen the bargaining position of a trade union or achieve a common social or political goal. They are organised by large coalitions of political, social, and labour organizations and may also include rallies, marches, boycotts, civil disobedience, non-payment of taxes, and other forms of direct or indirect action. Additionally, general strikes might exclude care workers, such as teachers, doctors, and nurses.

Collectivist anarchism, also called anarchist collectivism and anarcho-collectivism, is an anarchist school of thought that advocates the abolition of both the state and private ownership of the means of production. In their place, it envisions both the collective ownership of the means of production and the entitlement of workers to the fruits of their own labour, which would be ensured by a societal pact between individuals and collectives. Collectivists considered trade unions to be the means through which to bring about collectivism through a social revolution, where they would form the nucleus for a post-capitalist society.

Anarchism in Portugal first appeared in the form of organized groups in the mid-1880s. It was present from the first steps of the workers' movement, revolutionary unionism and anarcho-syndicalism had a lasting influence on the General Confederation of Labour, founded in 1919.

The Anarchist Federation of Britain was a British anarchist organisation that participated in the anti-war movement during World War II, organising a number of strike actions and providing support to conscientious objectors. Over time it gravitated towards anarcho-syndicalism, causing a split in the organisation, with the remnants reconstituting themselves as the Syndicalist Workers Federation.

Tom Brown (1900–1974) was a British anarcho-syndicalist trade unionist, anti-fascist, engineer and writer. Brown contributed articles to papers including War Commentary, Freedom, and Direct Action alongside authoring numerous pamphlets. Brown was known for his compelling public speaking and ability to communicate effectively in everyday terms. He placed a strong emphasis on federated local groups rather than centralism, and on workplace-based revolutionary trade unionism.

The history of anarcho-syndicalism dates back to the anti-authoritarian faction of the International Workingmen's Association. Revolutionary syndicalism as a tendency was constituted in the 1890s by the French General Confederation of Labour (CGT), which became a model union for other syndicalist organisations to base themselves on. Anarchists were involved in the syndicalist movement from the outset and a specific anarchist tendency developed within the movement over the subsequent decades.

References

  1. Franks 2006, p. 50.
  2. Franks 2006, p. 51.
  3. Franks 2006, p. 53; Franks 2009, p. 1.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Barberis, McHugh & Tyldesley 2000, p. 168.
  5. Barberis, McHugh & Tyldesley 2000, p. 168; Franks 2006, p. 53; Franks 2009, p. 1.
  6. Franks 2006, p. 145.
  7. Franks 2006, p. 361n164.
  8. 1 2 Franks 2006, p. 74.
  9. 1 2 3 Cross 2014, p. 135.
  10. Barberis, McHugh & Tyldesley 2000, pp. 167–168; Cross 2014, p. 135; Franks 2006, p. 74; Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, p. 9.
  11. Franks 2006, p. 81; Franks 2009, p. 1.
  12. Franks 2005, p. 239; Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, p. 9.
  13. Franks 2005, p. 239.
  14. Franks 2005, pp. 239–240.
  15. Franks 2005, pp. 240–241.
  16. 1 2 Testa 2017, p. 12.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, p. 9.
  18. 1 2 Franks 2006, pp. 81–82; Franks 2009, p. 1.
  19. Franks 2006, pp. 82–83; Franks 2009, p. 1.
  20. Franks 2006, pp. 82–83.
  21. Franks 2006, p. 82; Franks 2009, p. 1.
  22. Franks 2006, pp. 82, 238; Franks 2009, p. 1; Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, p. 11.
  23. Franks 2006, pp. 82, 238.
  24. Barberis, McHugh & Tyldesley 2000, p. 167; Franks 2006, pp. 19, 82; Franks 2009, pp. 1–2; Kinna 2005, pp. 4, 109; Lamb 2024, p. 273; Testa 2017, p. 12.
  25. Franks 2006, pp. 82, 115–116; Franks 2009, p. 1.
  26. Franks 2006, pp. 82, 115–116.
  27. Franks 2009, pp. 1–2; Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, pp. 10–11.
  28. Franks 2009, pp. 1–2.
  29. Franks 2006, p. 258.
  30. Franks 2006, p. 348.
  31. Testa 2017, pp. 17–18.
  32. Hern, Alex (7 July 2012). "Workfare goes underground as Holland and Barrett pull out". New Statesman . Retrieved 13 August 2024.
  33. Malik, Shiv (6 July 2012). "Holland & Barrett pulls out of jobseekers' scheme". The Guardian . Retrieved 13 August 2024.
  34. Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, pp. 9–10.
  35. Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, p. 10.
  36. Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, pp. 10–11.
  37. Maiguashca, Dean & Keith 2016, p. 48.
  38. Maiguashca, Dean & Keith 2016, p. 45.
  39. Barberis, McHugh & Tyldesley 2000, p. 167; Franks 2009, p. 1; Kinna 2005, p. 109.
  40. Franks 2006, p. 225.
  41. 1 2 Franks 2006, p. 237.
  42. 1 2 Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, p. 13n6.
  43. 1 2 Franks 2006, p. 241.
  44. Raekstad 2018, p. 362; Raekstad 2019, p. 70.
  45. Franks 2006, p. 235.
  46. Franks 2006, p. 82.
  47. Franks 2006, pp. 244, 296; Franks 2009, pp. 1–2.
  48. Franks 2006, p. 244; Franks 2009, pp. 1–2; Kinna 2005, p. 109.
  49. Franks & Kinna 2014, p. n51.
  50. Franks 2006, pp. 236–237.
  51. Kinna 2005, p. 74.
  52. Kinna 2005, p. 65.
  53. Franks 2009, p. 1.
  54. Franks 2006, pp. 115–116.
  55. Franks 2006, p. 394n174; Roca & Martín-Díaz 2017, p. 9.
  56. Franks 2006, p. 394n174.
  57. Franks 2006, p. 277.
  58. Franks 2006, p. 279.
  59. Franks 2006, p. 245; Kinna 2005, p. 109; Lamb 2024, p. 273.
  60. Franks 2006, p. 301.
  61. Franks 2006, p. 285.
  62. Franks 2006, pp. 285–286.

Bibliography

Further reading