Thelopsis

Last updated

Thelopsis
Thelopsis isiaca Stizenb 614302.jpg
Thelopsis isiaca in Portugal
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Ascomycota
Class: Lecanoromycetes
Order: Ostropales
Family: Stictidaceae
Genus: Thelopsis
Nyl. (1855)
Type species
Thelopsis rubella
Nyl. (1855)

Thelopsis is a genus of lichen-forming fungi in the family Gyalectaceae. The genus was established by the Finnish lichenologist William Nylander in 1855 and contains small bark-dwelling crustose lichens that form thin crusts on surfaces. These lichens make flask-shaped fruiting bodies called perithecia, which contain numerous small ascospores divided by cross-walls. Recent molecular studies have revealed that the genus forms a closely related group within the broader Gyalecta complex, leading to taxonomic revisions that now recognise about a dozen species worldwide.

Contents

Taxonomy

Thelopsis was circumscribed by the Finnish lichenologist William Nylander in 1855, with Thelopsis rubella as the type species. [1] It is a small, cosmopolitan genus of crustose lichens characterised by globose, semi-gelatinous perithecia with short, stiff periphyses; polysporous asci that stain blue in iodine; and small, transversely septate to sub-muriform, colourless ascospores. Early authors placed the genus in the family Stictidaceae. [2]

Antonín Vězda's 1968 revision treated just six species and suggested links to Ramonia. [3] Subsequent authors noted additional morphological affinities with Topelia; Per Magnus Jørgensen and Vězda even considered moving the genus to the Gyalectales because of features shared with Belonia, although they retained it in the Ostropales at that time. [2]

A multigene phylogeny published in 2021 delivered the first molecular appraisal of these relationships. The analysis showed that the type species T. rubella, along with T. byssoidea and the sterile taxon Opegrapha corticola , forms a strongly supported clade embedded in Gyalecta sensu lato, whereas T. melathelia resolves as sister to Ramonia valenzueliana . To align the taxonomy with these results, O. corticola was recombined as T. corticola, and T. melathelia was transferred to Ramonia. After these adjustments, Thelopsissensu stricto—the three remaining species—constitutes a well-supported monophyletic group. Because this trio also shares distinctive morphological traits, the authors kept Thelopsis as a separate genus pending broader sampling to clarify the limits of Gyalecta. [2]

Although early authors aligned Thelopsis with the Stictidaceae, multi-gene analyses by Ertz and colleagues (2021) showed that the three core species—T. rubella, T. byssoidea and the newly recombined T. corticola—form a strongly supported clade embedded in the family Gyalectaceae, not Stictidaceae. Building on these results, Cannon and colleagues (2024) adopt a narrower circumscription of Gyalecta that retains well-known genera such as Belonia , Cryptolechia and Pachyphiale and explicitly recognises the perithecial Thelopsis as a monophyletic lineage nested within the broader Gyalecta complex; they note that discarding the genus would render Gyalecta paraphyletic unless the latter were split into several segregate genera. Accordingly, their current treatment places Thelopsis as a distinct but closely allied genus within the Gyalectaceae. [4]

Description

Thelopsis produces a thin, sometimes almost indiscernible crust (a crustose thallus) that is partly embedded in, or slightly raised above, the surface on which it grows; in a few species it can be wispy and cotton-like (byssoid). Thallus colour varies from grey or greenish to orange-red, and a narrow whitish border ( prothallus ) may be present, though it is occasionally absent. The photosynthetic partner is a trentepohlioid alga—filamentous green algae of the genus Trentepohlia that often impart an orange tinge. Vegetative dispersal is uncommon: only one species develops minute pin-prick soralia that can merge into larger patches and release powdery soredia matching the thallus in colour. [4]

The genus is distinguished by its flask-shaped sexual fruiting bodies (perithecia) which lie within or on the thallus, sometimes presenting as small wart-like bumps. These perithecia range from colourless through reddish brown to black and lack an additional protective outer wall ( involucrellum ). Their wall ( exciple ) may comprise flattened cells or distinct filamentous hyphae, and the internal gel shows no staining reaction to iodine. The cavity is threaded with slender, unbranched paraphyses and short periphyses . Each ascus contains numerous colourless ascospores divided by up to three (occasionally five) cross-walls and often surrounded by a delicate outer layer ( perispore ); in dilute iodine the ascus tip stains blue. Asexual spores are generated in pale, flask-like pycnidia, which in one species are subdivided into several chambers. Spot tests and thin-layer chromatography have so far detected no secondary metabolites (lichen products) in the genus. [4]

Species

As of July 2025, Species Fungorum (in the Catalogue of Life) accept 12 species of Thelopsis, [5] although several more species are considered as accepted by Index Fungorum.

References

  1. ↑ Nylander, W. (1855). "Essai d'une nouvelle classification des lichens (second mémoire)" [Essay on a new classification of lichens (second memoir)]. Mémoires de la Société Impériale des Sciences Naturelles de Cherbourg (in French). 3: 194.
  2. 1 2 3 Ertz, Damien; Sanderson, Neil; Lebouvier, Marc (2021). "Thelopsis challenges the generic circumscription in the Gyalectaceae and brings new insights to the taxonomy of Ramonia". The Lichenologist. 53 (1): 45–61. doi:10.1017/S002428292000050X.
  3. ↑ Vězda, Antonín (1968). "Taxonomische Revision der Gattung Thelopsis Nyl. (Lichenisierte Fungi)". Folia geobotanica & phytotaxonomica (in German). 3 (4): 363–406. doi:10.1007/BF02851816.
  4. 1 2 3 Cannon, P.; Coppins, B.; Aptroot, A.; Sanderson, A.; Simkin, J. (2024). "Ostropales genera I, including Absconditella, Belonia, Clathroporinopsis, Corticifraga, Cryptodiscus, Cryptolechia, Francisrosea, Gomphillus, Gyalecta, Gyalidea, Gyalideopsis, Jamesiella, Karstenia, Nanostictis, Neopetractis, Pachyphiale, Petractis, Phialopsis, Phlyctis, Ramonia, Sagiolechia, Secoliga, Sphaeropezia, Spirographa, Stictis, Thelopsis, Thrombium and Xerotrema". Revisions of British and Irish Lichens (PDF). Vol. 38. p. 24.
  5. ↑ "Thelopsis". Catalogue of Life . Species 2000: Leiden, the Netherlands. Retrieved 16 July 2025.
  6. ↑ Aptroot, André; Mendonça, Cléverton de Oliveira; Ferraro, Lidia Itati; Cáceres, Marcela Eugenia da Silva (2014). "A world key to species of the genera Topelia and Thelopsis (Stictidaceae), with the description of three new species from Brazil and Argentina". The Lichenologist. 46 (6): 801–807. doi:10.1017/S0024282914000425.
  7. ↑ Renobales, G.; Barreno, E.; Atienza, V. (1996). "Thelopsis foveolata, a new lichen from northern Spain". The Lichenologist. 28 (2): 105–111. doi:10.1006/lich.1996.0010.
  8. ↑ Stizenberger, E. (1895). "Supplementa ad Lichenaeam Africanam. II. Addenda et corrigenda ex annis 1893/94" [Supplements to the African Lichenology. II. Additions and corrections from the years 1893/94]. Bericht über die Thätigkeit der St. Gallischen Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft (in German). 1893–1894: 215–264 [262].
  9. ↑ Kondratyuk, S.Y.; Lőkös, L.; Halda, J.P.; Haji Moniri, M.; Farkas, E.; Park, J.S.; Lee, B. G.; Oh, S.-O.; Hur, J.-S. (2016). "New and noteworthy lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi 4". Acta Botanica Hungarica. 58 (1–2): 75–136 [99]. doi: 10.1556/034.58.2016.1-2.4 .
  10. ↑ Moon, K.H.; Aptroot, A. (2009). "Pyrenocarpous lichens in Korea". Bibliotheca Lichenologica. 99: 297–314 [309].
  11. ↑ Egea, J.M.; Torrente, P. (1996). "Tres nuevas especies de hongos liquenizados de la Provincia del Cabo (Sudáfrica)" [Three new species of lichenised fungi from Cape Province (South Africa)]. Cryptogamie Bryologie Lichénologie (in Spanish). 17 (4): 295–312.
  12. ↑ Aptroot, A.; Souza, M.F.; Spielmann, A.A. (2020). "New lichen species from the Pantanal in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil". Archive for Lichenology. 20: 1–7.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.