 | This article may overuse or misuse color, making it hard to understand for color-blind users.(August 2023) |
 |
The list below consists of the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1993. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
Delivered the Court's reason | Joined the Court's reason | Filed a concurrence | Joined a concurrence |
Filed a dissent | Joined a dissent | Filed a concurrence/dissent | Joined a concurrence/dissent |
Did not participate in the judgment | Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment | Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering | |
| |||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG Checo International Ltd v British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority , [1993] 1 SCR 12 | January 28, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Queen v Cognos Inc, [1993] 1 SCR 87 | January 29, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Cooper, [1993] 1 SCR 146 | October 6, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Hongkong Bank of Canada v Wheeler Holdings Ltd, [1993] 1 SCR 167 | February 4, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v MacKenzie, [1993] 1 SCR 212 | April 3, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Reid Crowther & Partners Ltd v Simcoe & Erie General Insurance Co, [1993] 1 SCR 252 | October 13, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Caisse populaire de Maniwaki v Giroux, [1993] 1 SCR 282 | October 13, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Engel v Salyn, [1993] 1 SCR 306 | October 14, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| New Brunswick Broadcasting Co v Nova Scotia (Speaker of the House of Assembly) , [1993] 1 SCR 319 | March 2, 3, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Baron v Canada, [1993] 1 SCR 416 | February 6, 1992 | January 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Pouliot, [1993] 1 SCR 456 | February 1, 1993 | February 1, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Honish, [1993] 1 SCR 458 | February 2, 1993 | February 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Jones, [1993] 1 SCR 460 | February 2, 1993 | February 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Morgentaler , [1993] 1 SCR 462 | February 2, 1993 | February 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Pitt, [1993] 1 SCR 466 | February 22, 1993 | February 22, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| R v Alkerton, [1993] 1 SCR 468 | February 22, 1993 | February 22, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v P (J), [1993] 1 SCR 469 | February 24, 1993 | February 24, 1993 | |||||||||
| Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières v Larocque, [1993] 1 SCR 471 | November 30, 1992 | February 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| The Rhône v The Peter AB Widener , [1993] 1 SCR 497 | May 26, 1992 | February 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| Canada (AG) v Mossop , [1993] 1 SCR 554 | June 3, 1992 | February 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Sharma, [1993] 1 SCR 650 | April 28, 1992 | February 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Greenbaum, [1993] 1 SCR 674 | December 4;, 1992 | February 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v B (FF), [1993] 1 SCR 697 | October 5, 1992 | February 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v B (KG) , [1993] 1 SCR 740 | October 8, 1992 | February 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Thomas, [1993] 1 SCR 835 | February 26, 1993 | February 26, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Macooh, [1993] 2 SCR 802 | February 26, 1993 | June 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v P (VL), [1993] 1 SCR 837 | March 3, 1993 | March 3, 1993 | |||||||||
| Reference Re Public Schools Act (Man), s 79(3), (4) and (7), [1993] 1 SCR 839 | December 3, 1992 | March 4, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Hundal , [1993] 1 SCR 867 | January 30, 1992 | March 11, 1993 | |||||||||
| Westar Mining Ltd (Re), [1993] 1 SCR 890 | March 1, 1993 | March 18, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| R v Douglas; R v Myers, [1993] 1 SCR 893 | March 23, 1993 | March 23, 1993 | |||||||||
| Sie-Mac Pipeline Contractors Ltd v MNR, [1993] 1 SCR 895 | March 24, 1993 | March 24, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Finta , [1993] 1 SCR 1138 | March 24, 1993 | March 24, 1993 | |||||||||
| Amchem Products Inc v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) , [1993] 1 SCR 897 | May 25, 1992 | March 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| Canada (AG) v Public Service Alliance of Canada, [1993] 1 SCR 941 | November 12, 1992 | March 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| Peter v Beblow, [1993] 1 SCR 980 | November 12, 1992 | March 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| Barrette v Crabtree Estate, [1993] 1 SCR 1027 | March 25, 1993 | December 1, 1992 | |||||||||
| Dehghani v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1993] 1 SCR 1053 | December 2, 1992 | March 24, 1993 | |||||||||
| Finlay v Canada (Minister of Finance), [1993] 1 SCR 1080 | March 23, 1992 rehearing: January 28, 1993 | March 25, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Schiewe, [1993] 1 SCR 1134 | March 26, 1993 | March 26, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Steeves, [1993] 1 SCR 1136 | March 31, 1993 | March 31, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Goncalves, [1993] 2 SCR 3 | April 2, 1993 | April 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Théroux, [1993] 2 SCR 5 | November 3, 1992 | April 8, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Zlatic, [1993] 2 SCR 29 | April 8, 1993 | November 6, 1992 | |||||||||
| R v Imbeault, [1993] 2 SCR 51 | March 29, 1993 | April 8, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| Kourtessis v MNR, [1993] 2 SCR 53 | February 6, 1992 | April 22, 1993 | |||||||||
| Ciarlariello v Schacter, [1993] 2 SCR 119 | November 30, 1992 | April 22, 1993 | |||||||||
| Cunningham v Canada, [1993] 2 SCR 143 | January 29, 1993 | April 22, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Hawkins, [1993] 2 SCR 157 | April 28, 1993 | April 28, 1993 | |||||||||
| Hall v Hebert , [1993] 2 SCR 159 | October 6, 1992 | April 29, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v C (R), [1993] 2 SCR 226 | April 29, 1993 | April 29, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Slaney, [1993] 2 SCR 228 | April 30, 1993 | April 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| Dayco (Canada) Ltd v CAW-Canada, [1993] 2 SCR 230 | May 7, 1992 | May 6, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Osolin, [1993] 2 SCR 313 | May 6, 1993 | May 6, 1993 | |||||||||
| United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 579 v Bradco Construction Ltd, [1993] 2 SCR 316 | October 16, 1992 | May 19, 1993 | |||||||||
| University of British Columbia v Berg, [1993] 2 SCR 353 | January 27, 1993 | May 19, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Hasselwander, [1993] 2 SCR 398 | February 5, 1993 | May 19, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v M (JJ), [1993] 2 SCR 421 | February 5, 1993 | May 19, 1993 | |||||||||
| Sauvé v Canada (AG) , [1993] 2 SCR 438 | May 27, 1993 | May 27, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v D (A), [1993] 2 SCR 441 | June 1, 1993 | June 1, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| Artell Developments Ltd v 677950 Ontario Ltd, [1993] 2 SCR 443 | June 4, 1993 | June 4, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Thornton, [1993] 2 SCR 445 | June 4, 1993 | June 4, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Clutterbuck, [1993] 2 SCR 447 | June 8, 1993 | June 8, 1993 | |||||||||
| Westar Mining Ltd (Re), [1993] 2 SCR 448 | June 8, 1993 | June 8, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Egger, [1993] 2 SCR 451 | October 9, 1992 | June 10, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Aalders, [1993] 2 SCR 482 | March 3, 1993 | June 10, 1993 | |||||||||
| Reference Re Education Act (Que), [1993] 2 SCR 511 | December 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, 1992 | June 17, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Bevan, [1993] 2 SCR 599 | March 5, 1993 | June 17, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Evans , [1993] 2 SCR 629 | March 22, 1993 | June 17, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Erickson, [1993] 2 SCR 649 | June 17, 1993 | June 17, 1993 | |||||||||
| Flieger v New Brunswick, [1993] 2 SCR 651 | April 26, 1993 | June 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| Canada (AG) v Ward , [1993] 2 SCR 689 | March 25, 1992 | June 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| Domtar Inc v Quebec (Commission d'appel en matière de lésions professionnelles), [1993] 2 SCR 756 | April 1, 1993 | June 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| Saint-Basile, Village Sud (Corporation municipale de) v Ciment Québec Inc, [1993] 2 SCR 823 | February 23, 1993 | July 15, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v V (KB), [1993] 2 SCR 857 | June 16, 1993 | July 15, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| R v Gallagher, [1993] 2 SCR 861 | March 1, 1993 | August 12, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Frazer, [1993] 2 SCR 866 | March 1, 1993 | August 12, 1993 | |||||||||
| Weatherall v Canada (AG), [1993] 2 SCR 872 | March 25, 1993 | August 12, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Potvin , [1993] 2 SCR 880 | June 7, 1993 | August 12, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Brown, [1993] 2 SCR 918 | June 18, 1993 | August 12, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Tremblay, [1993] 2 SCR 932 | February 23, 1993 | September 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Tortone, [1993] 2 SCR 973 | April 28, 1993 | September 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| Haig v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) , [1993] 2 SCR 995 | March 4, 1993 | September 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| Murphy v Welsh; Stoddard v Watson, [1993] 2 SCR 1069 | May 31, 1993 | September 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| Ramsden v Peterborough (City of) , [1993] 2 SCR 1084 | June 1, 1993 | September 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Creighton , [1993] 3 SCR 3 | February 3, 1993 | September 9, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Gosset, [1993] 3 SCR 76 | May 1, 1993 | September 9, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Finlay, [1993] 3 SCR 103 | October 15, 1993 | September 9, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Naglik, [1993] 3 SCR 122 | April 5, 1993 | September 9, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v E (AW), [1993] 3 SCR 155 | January 29, 1993 | September 9, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| Auto Concrete Curb Ltd v South Nation River Conservation Authority, [1993] 3 SCR 201 | June 14, 1993 | September 9, 1993 | |||||||||
| Edgeworth Construction Ltd v ND Lea & Associates Ltd, [1993] 3 SCR 206 | June 14, 1993 | September 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Grant, [1993] 3 SCR 223 | April 2, 1993 | September 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Wiley, [1993] 3 SCR 263 | November 5, 1992 | September 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Plant , [1993] 3 SCR 281 | November 5, 1992 | September 30, 1993f | |||||||||
| R v Harbottle , [1993] 3 SCR 306 | May 25, 1993 | September 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| Ontario Hydro v Ontario (Labour Relations Board) , [1993] 3 SCR 327 | November 9, 1992 | September 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| Slattery (Trustee of) v Slattery, [1993] 3 SCR 430 | March 29, 1993 | September 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Morgentaler , [1993] 3 SCR 463 | February 4, 1993 | September 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| Rodriguez v British Columbia (AG) , [1993] 3 SCR 519 | May 20, 1993 | September 30, 1993 | |||||||||
| National Party of Canada v Canadian Broadcasting Corp, [1993] 3 SCR 651 | October 4, 1993 | October 4, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Price, [1993] 3 SCR 633 | October 5, 1993 | October 5, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Smith, [1993] 3 SCR 635 | October 6, 1993 | October 6, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Profit, [1993] 3 SCR 637 | October 7, 1993 | October 7, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Côté, [1993] 3 SCR 639 | October 7, 1993 | October 7, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| R v Leduc, [1993] 3 SCR 641 | October 8, 1993 | October 8, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v B (JG), [1993] 3 SCR 643 | October 8, 1993 | October 8, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Gaetz, [1993] 3 SCR 645 | October 12, 1993 | October 12, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Yorke, [1993] 3 SCR 647 | October 15, 1993 | October 15, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Ruiz, [1993] 3 SCR 649 | October 15, 1993 | October 15, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Evans, [1993] 3 SCR 653 | March 24, 1993 | October 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Hy and Zel's Inc v Ontario (AG); Paul Magder Furs Ltd v Ontario (AG), [1993] 3 SCR 675 | February 25, 1993 | October 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Canada Labour Relations Board v Québecair, [1993] 3 SCR 724 | |||||||||||
| R v Dersch , [1993] 3 SCR 768 | March 30, 1993 | October 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Air Canada v M & L Travel Ltd, [1993] 3 SCR 787 | April 26, 1993 | October 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| Young v Young, [1993] 4 SCR 3 | January 25, 26, 1993 | October 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| P (D) v S (C), [1993] 4 SCR 141 | January 25, 26, 1993 | October 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Felawka, [1993] 4 SCR 199 | October 21, 1993 | April 1, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Marquard , [1993] 4 SCR 223 | April 29, 1993 | October 21, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Mills, [1993] 4 SCR 277 | November 2, 1993 | November 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| Granville Savings and Mortgage Corp v Slevin, [1993] 4 SCR 279 | November 2, 1993 | November 2, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Nuosci, [1993] 4 SCR 283 | November 3, 1993 | November 3, 1993 | |||||||||
| Friedberg v Canada, [1993] 4 SCR 285 | November 5, 1993 | November 5, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Brassard, [1993] 4 SCR 287 | November 5, 1993 | November 5, 1993 | |||||||||
| Hunt v T&N plc , [1993] 4 SCR 289 | October 7, 1992 | November 18, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Litchfield, [1993] 4 SCR 333 | June 7, 1993 | November 18, 1993 | |||||||||
| Allard Contractors Ltd v Coquitlam (District of), [1993] 4 SCR 371 | May 26, 1993 | November 18, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v L (DO), [1993] 4 SCR 419 | June 15, 1993 | November 18, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Levogiannis, [1993] 4 SCR 475 | June 15, 1993 | November 18, 1993 | |||||||||
| United States of America v Doyer, [1993] 4 SCR 497 | November 29, 1993 | November 29, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Moran, [1993] 4 SCR 499 | November 29, 1993 | November 29, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Rowbotham; R v Roblin, [1993] 4 SCR 834 | December 8, 1993 | December 8, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v McAnespie, [1993] 4 SCR 501 | December 10, 1993 | December 10, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v I (LR) and T (E), [1993] 4 SCR 504 | March 31, 1993 | December 16, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Tapaquon, [1993] 4 SCR 535 | May 25, 1993 | December 16, 1993 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
| R v Jackson, [1993] 4 SCR 573 | June 3, 1993 | December 16, 1993 | |||||||||
| R v Osolin, [1993] 4 SCR 595 | June 17, 1993 | December 16, 1993 | |||||||||
| Symes v Canada, [1993] 4 SCR 695 | March 2, 1993 | December 16, 1993 |
A play-by-mail game is a game played through postal mail, email, or other digital media. Correspondence chess and Go were among the first PBM games. Diplomacy has been played by mail since 1963, introducing a multi-player aspect to PBM games. Flying Buffalo Inc. pioneered the first commercially available PBM game in 1970. A small number of PBM companies followed in the 1970s, with an explosion of hundreds of startup PBM companies in the 1980s at the peak of PBM gaming popularity, many of them small hobby companies—more than 90 percent of which eventually folded. A number of independent PBM magazines also started in the 1980s, including The Nuts & Bolts of PBM, Gaming Universal, Paper Mayhem and Flagship. These magazines eventually went out of print, replaced in the 21st century by the online PBM journal Suspense and Decision.
Thoroughgood "Thurgood" Marshall was an American civil rights lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1967 until 1991. He was the Supreme Court's first African-American justice. Prior to his judicial service, he was an attorney who fought for civil rights, leading the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Marshall was a prominent figure in the movement to end racial segregation in American public schools. He won 29 of the 32 civil rights cases he argued before the Supreme Court, culminating in the Court's landmark 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which rejected the separate but equal doctrine and held segregation in public education to be unconstitutional. President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed Marshall to the Supreme Court in 1967. A staunch liberal, he frequently dissented as the Court became increasingly conservative.
Julio César Chávez González, also known as Julio César Chávez Sr., is a Mexican former professional boxer who competed from 1980 to 2005. A multiple-time world champion in three weight divisions, Chávez was listed by The Ring magazine as the world's best boxer, pound for pound, from 1990 to 1993. During his career he held the WBC super featherweight title from 1984 to 1987, the WBA and WBC lightweight titles between 1987 and 1989, the WBC light welterweight title twice between 1989 and 1996, and the IBF light welterweight title from 1990 to 1991. He also held the Ring magazine and lineal lightweight titles from 1988 to 1989, and the lineal light welterweight title twice between 1990 and 1996. Chávez was named Fighter of the Year for 1987 and 1990 by the Boxing Writers Association of America and The Ring respectively.
Evander Holyfield is an American former professional boxer who competed between 1984 and 2011. He reigned as the undisputed champion at cruiserweight in the late 1980s and at heavyweight in the early 1990s, and was the only boxer in history to win the undisputed championship in two weight classes in the "three belt era", a feat later surpassed by Terence Crawford, Naoya Inoue and Oleksandr Usyk, who became two-weight undisputed champions in the four-belt era. Nicknamed "the Real Deal", Holyfield is the only four-time world heavyweight champion, having held the unified WBA, WBC, and IBF titles from 1990 to 1992, the WBA and IBF titles again from 1993 to 1994, the WBA title a third time from 1996 to 1999; the IBF title a third time from 1997 to 1999 and the WBA title for a fourth time from 2000 to 2001.
A directive is a legal act of the European Union that requires member states to achieve particular goals without dictating how the member states achieve those goals. A directive's goals have to be made the goals of one or more new or changed national laws by the member states before this legislation applies to individuals residing in the member states. Directives normally leave member states with a certain amount of leeway as to the exact rules to be adopted. Directives can be adopted by means of a variety of legislative procedures depending on their subject matter.
The House of Councillors is the upper house of the National Diet of Japan. The House of Representatives is the lower house. The House of Councillors is the successor to the pre-war House of Peers. If the two houses disagree on matters of the budget, treaties, or the nomination of the prime minister, the House of Representatives can insist on its decision. In other decisions, the House of Representatives can override a vote of the House of Councillors only by a two-thirds majority of members present.
In psychology, decision-making is regarded as the cognitive process resulting in the selection of a belief or a course of action among several possible alternative options. It could be either rational or irrational. The decision-making process is a reasoning process based on assumptions of values, preferences and beliefs of the decision-maker. Every decision-making process produces a final choice, which may or may not prompt action.
Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided 8–1 in favor of the respondent, Edward Schempp, on behalf of his son Ellery Schempp, and declared that school-sponsored Bible reading and the recitation of the Lord's Prayer in public schools in the United States was unconstitutional.
The president of the Slovak Republic is the head of state of Slovakia and the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces. The people directly elect the president for five years, for a maximum of two consecutive terms. The presidency is essentially a ceremonial office, but the president does exercise certain limited powers with absolute discretion. The president's official residence is the Grassalkovich Palace in Bratislava.
The 1994 Commonwealth Games were held in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, from 18 to 28 August 1994. Ten types of sports were featured at the Victoria Games: athletics, aquatics, badminton, boxing, cycling, gymnastics, lawn bowls, shooting, weightlifting, and wrestling.
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance passed in Hialeah, Florida, forbidding the "unnecessar[y]" killing of "an animal in a public or private ritual or ceremony not for the primary purpose of food consumption", was unconstitutional.
Pierre Nelson Leval is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. At the time of his appointment by President Bill Clinton in 1993, he was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The government of Russia is the federal executive body of state power of the Russian Federation. The members of the government are the prime minister, the deputy prime ministers, and the federal ministers. It has its legal basis in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the federal constitutional law "On the Government of the Russian Federation". The Apparatus of the Government of Russia is a governmental body which administrates the activities of the government.
The NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision (FCS), formerly known as Division I-AA, is the second-highest level of college football in the United States, after the Football Bowl Subdivision. Sponsored by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the FCS level comprises 129 teams in 13 conferences as of the 2024 season. The FCS designation is relevant only for football; members of the subdivision compete in NCAA Division I in all other sports.
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District, 508 U.S. 384 (1993), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States concerning whether the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment was offended by a school district that refused to allow a church access to school premises to show films dealing with family and child-rearing issues faced by parents. In a unanimous decision, the court concluded that it was.
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 509 U.S. 1 (1993), was a case before the United States Supreme Court.
The National Bank of Georgia is the central bank of Georgia. Its status is defined by the Constitution of Georgia. According to the Constitution of Georgia, it is independent of state control, and is tasked with ensuring price stability. The supreme body of the National Bank is its council, composed of seven members. The Chairman of the council is the President of the National Bank. The council, in addition to the chairman, is composed of two Vice Presidents and other members. Members of the NBG Council are elected for the seven-year term by the Parliament of Georgia, by the majority of the total number of its members, upon the nomination of the President of Georgia.
Tanzin v. Tanvir, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving legal remedies that could be sought by litigants against federal officials for violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. In a unanimous decision issued December 10, 2020, the court ruled that the Act allowed for litigants to seek not only injunctive relief but also monetary damages.