The table below lists the decisions (known as reasons) delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2022. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
Delivered the Court's reason | Joined the Court's reason | Filed a concurrence | Joined a concurrence |
Filed a dissent | Joined a dissent | Filed a concurrence/dissent | Joined a concurrence/dissent |
Did not participate in the judgment | Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment | Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering | |
|
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer | Jamal | O'Bonsawin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R v Ali, 2022 SCC 1 [1] | January 14, 2022 | January 14, 2022 | V | V | ||||||||
R v Boulanger, 2022 SCC 2 [2] | February 9, 2022 | February 9, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R v Ste-Marie, 2022 SCC 3 [3] | February 10, 2022 | February 10, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R v A.E., 2022 SCC 4 [4] | February 15, 2022 | February 15, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R v Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5 [5] | March 15, 2022 | March 15, 2022 | V | |||||||||
Anderson v Alberta, 2022 SCC 6 [6] | November 4, 2021 | March 18, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v White, 2022 SCC 7 [7] | March 18, 2022 | March 18, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R v Pope, 2022 SCC 8 [8] | March 21, 2022 | March 21, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R v Samaniego, 2022 SCC 9 [9] | November 5, 2021 | March 25, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Vallières, 2022 SCC 10 [10] | November 12, 2021 | March 31, 2022 | ||||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer | Jamal | O'Bonsawin |
R v Stairs , 2022 SCC 11 | November 2, 2021 | April 8, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Tim, 2022 SCC 12 | October 7, 2021 | April 8, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Gerrard, 2022 SCC 13 | April 19, 2022 | April 19, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R v Alas, 2022 SCC 14 | April 21, 2022 | April 21, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R v J.D., 2022 SCC 15 | November 10, 2021 | April 22, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Dussault, 2022 SCC 16 | December 3, 2021 | April 29, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v J.F., 2022 SCC 17 | November 30, 2021 | May 6, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Brown , 2022 SCC 18 | November 9, 2021 | May 13, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Sullivan, 2022 SCC 19 | October 12, 2021 | May 13, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Badger, 2022 SCC 20 | May 17, 2022 | May 17, 2022 | V | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer | Jamal | O'Bonsawin |
R v Safdar, 2022 SCC 21 | May 18, 2022 | May 18, 2022 | V | |||||||||
Barendregt v. Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 | December 1 and 2, 2021 | May 20, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Bissonnette , 2022 SCC 23 | March 24, 2022 | May 27, 2022 | ||||||||||
B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24 | December 1 and 2, 2021 | June 3, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Goforth, 2022 SCC 25 | December 7, 2021 | June 10, 2022 | ||||||||||
Canada (Attorney General) v. Collins Family Trust, 2022 SCC 26 | January 11, 2022 | June 17, 2022 | ||||||||||
British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Council of Canadians with Disabilities, 2022 SCC 27 | January 12 and 13, 2022 | June 23, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28 | October 5 and 6, 2021 | June 30, 2022 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Abrametz, 2022 SCC 29 | November 8, 2021 | July 8, 2022 | ||||||||||
SOCAN v. ESA, 2022 SCC 30 | January 18, 2022 | July 15, 2022 | ||||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer | Jamal | O'Bonsawin |
R v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31 | December 9, 2021 | July 21, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v. Lafrance, 2022 SCC 32 | December 3, 2021 | July 22, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33 | November 3, 2021 | July 29, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34 | December 10, 2021 | October 7, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v. Tessier, 2022 SCC 35 | December 6, 2021 | October 14, 2022 | ||||||||||
Annapolis Group Inc. v. Halifax Regional Municipality, 2022 SCC 36 | February 16, 2022 | October 23, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Nahanee, 2022 SCC 37 | March 16, 2022 | October 27, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Ndhlovu, 2022 SCC 38 | February 8, 2022 | October 28, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Sharma, 2022 SCC 39 | March 23, 2022 | November 4, 2022 | ||||||||||
R v Doxtator, 2022 SCC 40 | November 9, 2022 | November 9, 2022 | V | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer | Jamal | O'Bonsawin |
Peace River Hydro Partners v Petrowest Corp , 2022 SCC 41 [11] | January 19, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | ||||||||||
Des Groseillers v. Quebec (Agence du revenu), 2022 SCC 42 | November 3, 2022 | November 17, 2022 | ||||||||||
Nova Chemicals Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co., 2022 SCC 43 | April 20, 2022 | November 18, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Ramelson, 2022 SCC 44 | May 17, 2022 | November 24, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Jaffer, 2022 SCC 45 | May 17, 2022 | November 24, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Haniffa, 2022 SCC 46 | May 17, 2022 | November 24, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Dare, 2022 SCC 47 | May 17, 2022 | November 24, 2022 | ||||||||||
Canada (Transportation Safety Board) v. Carroll-Byrne, 2022 SCC 48 | March 17, 2022 | November 25, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Clark, 2022 SCC 49 | November 30, 2022 | November 30, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R. v. D.R., 2022 SCC 50 | December 1, 2022 | December 1, 2022 | V | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer | Jamal | O'Bonsawin |
F. v. N., 2022 SCC 51 | April 12, 2022 | December 2, 2022 | ||||||||||
R. v. Furey, 2022 SCC 52 | December 2, 2022 | December 2, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R. v. Vernelus, 2022 SCC 53 | December 6, 2022 | December 6, 2022 | V | |||||||||
R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54 | February 14, 2022 | December 9, 2022 | ||||||||||
The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.
Gordon Fripp Henderson, was a Canadian intellectual property lawyer who joined the law firm Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP in 1937, and later became its chairman. He was known for his advocacy on intellectual property matters as well as his involvement in intellectual property organizations throughout his career. Henderson's contribution to the development of Canadian and international jurisprudence is described as one of the most significant in Canadian legal history.
R v Parks, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 871 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal automatism defence.
The Privacy Act is the federal information-privacy legislation of Canada that came into effect on July 1, 1983. Administered by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Act sets out rules for how institutions of the Government of Canada collect, use, disclose, retain, and dispose of personal information of individuals.
Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta) [1987] 1 S.C.R. 313, commonly referred to as the Alberta Reference, was a leading opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to freedom of association under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that section 2(d) did not include the right to strike. In 2015, Alberta Reference was overruled, with the Court recognizing a right to strike in the Charter.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2001. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
Imre Finta was the first person prosecuted under Canada's war crimes legislation. He was charged in 1987 and acquitted in 1990.
Thomas Albert Cromwell is a Canadian jurist and former Puisne Justice on the Supreme Court of Canada. After eleven years on the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Cromwell was nominated to succeed Michel Bastarache and occupy the seat traditionally reserved for Atlantic provinces on the Supreme Court of Canada by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and assumed office on December 22, 2008. Cromwell retired in September 2016, and was succeeded by Malcolm Rowe.
A Gladue report is a type of pre-sentencing and bail hearing report that a Canadian court can request when considering sentencing an offender of Indigenous background under Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code.
Russell S. Brown is a former puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He was nominated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to replace outgoing justice Marshall Rothstein and served in the role starting on August 31, 2015. Prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court, he was a justice at the Alberta Court of Appeal, and before that a law professor at the University of Alberta. He resigned on June 12, 2023, prior to the completion of an investigation by the Canadian Judicial Council into alleged harassment.
Malliha Wilson is a Tamil Canadian lawyer who served as an Assistant Deputy Attorney General of the Government of Ontario from April 2008 to November 2016.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2018. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2019. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
Criminal sentencing in Canada is governed by the Canadian Criminal Code. The Criminal Code, along with the Supreme Court of Canada, have distinguished the treatment of Indigenous individuals within the Canadian Criminal Sentencing Regime.
R v Stairs, 2022 SCC 11 is a constitutional rights decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court established new standards for searches of a person's home after they have been arrested. At issue in the case was whether the traditional common law power of Search Incident to Arrest, which allows police officers to engage in warrantless searches of lawfully arrested persons, was compliant with section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as it related to searches of the home.
Health Services and Support – Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v British Columbia [2007] 2 SCR 391 is a landmark Canadian labour law case concerning freedom of association under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada determined that the Charter protects a meaningful process of collective bargaining.
R v Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd. [2001] 3 SCR 209 is a Canadian labour law case concerning compulsory trade union membership in the Quebec construction industry. The Supreme Court of Canada considered the application of section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to the Quebec law in question. A divided Court affirmed the law's constitutionality.
Ontario v Fraser [2011] 2 SCR 3 is a Canadian labour law case concerning the protection of collective bargaining under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At issue was an Ontario law that created a separate labour relations regime for agricultural workers. The Court considered the standard for establishing a breach of section 2(d) in cases where government action is alleged to interfere with collective bargaining rights. A majority of the Court upheld the law, finding no breach of sections 2(d) or 15 of the Charter.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2023. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2024. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.