The table below lists the decisions (known as reasons) delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2019. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
Delivered the Court's reason | Joined the Court's reason | Filed a concurrence | Joined a concurrence |
Filed a dissent | Joined a dissent | Filed a concurrence/dissent | Joined a concurrence/dissent |
Did not participate in the judgment | Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment | Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering | |
|
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frank v Canada (AG), 2019 SCC 1 [1] | March 21, 2018 | January 11, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Beaudry, 2019 SCC 2 [2] | January 14, 2019 | January 14, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Fedyck, 2019 SCC 3 [3] | January 15, 2019 | January 15, 2019 | ||||||||||
SA v Metro Vancouver Housing Corp, 2019 SCC 4 [4] | April 25, 2018 | January 25, 2019 | ||||||||||
Orphan Well Association v Grant Thornton Ltd, 2019 SCC 5 [5] | February 15, 2018 | January 31, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Calnen, 2019 SCC 6 [6] | February 12, 2018 | February 1, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Bird, 2019 SCC 7 [7] | March 16, 2018 | February 8, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v CJ, 2019 SCC 8 [8] | February 12, 2019 | February 12, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Blanchard, 2019 SCC 9 [9] | February 13, 2019 | February 13, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 [10] | April 20, 2018 | February 14, 2019 | ||||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer |
R v Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11 [11] | February 14, 2019 | February 14, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v George-Nurse, 2019 SCC 12 [12] | February 15, 2019 | February 15, 2019 | V | |||||||||
Barer v Knight Brothers LLC , 2019 SCC 13 [13] | April 24, 2018 | February 22, 2019 | ||||||||||
Salomon v Matte-Thompson, 2019 SCC 14 | March 19, 2018 | February 28, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Morrison, 2019 SCC 15 | April 24, 2018 | March 15, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Snelgrove, 2019 SCC 16 | March 22, 2019 | March 22, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Kelsie, 2019 SCC 17 | March 27, 2019 | March 27, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Myers, 2019 SCC 18 | October 18, 2018 | March 28, 2019 | ||||||||||
TELUS Communications Inc v Wellman, 2019 SCC 19 | November 6, 2018 | April 4, 2019 | ||||||||||
JW v Canada (AG), 2019 SCC 20 | October 10, 2018 | April 12, 2019 | * | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer |
R v Thanabalasingham, 2019 SCC 21 | April 17, 2019 | April 17, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Mills, 2019 SCC 22 | May 25, 2018 | April 18, 2019 | 1 | 2 | 1 | * | 3 | |||||
R v JM, 2019 SCC 24 | April 18, 2019 | April 18, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Larue, 2019 SCC 25 | April 23, 2019 | April 23, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Wakefield, 2019 SCC 26 | April 25, 2019 | April 25, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v WLS, 2019 SCC 27 | April 26, 2019 | April 26, 2019 | V | |||||||||
Modern Cleaning Concept Inc v Comité paritaire de l'entretien d'édifices publics de la région de Québec, 2019 SCC 28 | November 13, 2018 | May 3, 2019 | ||||||||||
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Chhina, 2019 SCC 29 | November 14, 2018 | May 10, 2019 | ||||||||||
Christine DeJong Medicine Professional Corp v DBDC Spadina Ltd, 2019 SCC 30 | May 14, 2019 | May 14, 2019 | V | |||||||||
Bessette v British Columbia (AG), 2019 SCC 31 | November 15, 2019 | May 16, 2019 | ||||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer |
R v Omar, 2019 SCC 32 | May 22, 2019 | May 22, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Barton, 2019 SCC 33 | October 11, 2018 | May 24, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Le, 2019 SCC 34 | October 12, 2018 | May 31, 2019 | ||||||||||
L'Oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal v JJ, 2019 SCC 35 | November 7, 2018 | June 7, 2019 | ||||||||||
1068754 Alberta Ltd. v. Québec (Agence du revenu), 2019 SCC 37 | January 22, 2019 | June 27, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Goldfinch, 2019 SCC 38 | January 16, 2019 | June 28, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39 | February 21, 2019 | July 5, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Stillman, 2019 SCC 40 | March 26, 2019 | July 26, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v R.V., 2019 SCC 41 | March 20, 2019 | July 31, 2019 | ||||||||||
Pioneer Corp. v Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42 | December 11, 2018 | September 20, 2019 | ||||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer |
Keatley Surveying Ltd. v Teranet Inc. , 2019 SCC 43 | March 29, 2019 | September 26, 2019 | ||||||||||
Denis v Côté, 2019 SCC 44 | May 16, 2019 | September 27, 2019 | ||||||||||
Fleming v Ontario , 2019 SCC 45 | March 21, 2019 | October 4, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v M.R.H., 2019 SCC 46 | October 9, 2019 | October 9, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Poulin, 2019 SCC 47 | March 25, 2019 | October 11, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 | October 16, 2019 | October 16, 2019 [14] | ||||||||||
R v Kernaz, 2019 SCC 48 | October 18, 2019 | October 18, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R.S. v P.R., 2019 SCC 49 | January 21, 2019 | October 25, 2019 | ||||||||||
Threlfall v Carleton University, 2019 SCC 50 | February 22, 2019 | October 31, 2019 | ||||||||||
Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Young, 2020 SCC 15 | November 7, 2019 | November 7, 2019 [15] | ||||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer |
R v Rafilovich, 2019 SCC 51 | January 25, 2019 | November 8, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v James, 2019 SCC 52 | November 8, 2019 | November 8, 2019 | V | |||||||||
Volkswagen Group Canada Inc. v Association québécoise de lutte contre la pollution atmosphérique, 2019 SCC 53 | November 13, 2019 | November 13, 2019 | V | |||||||||
R v Javanmardi, 2019 SCC 54 | May 15, 2019 | November 14, 2019 | ||||||||||
Michel v. Graydon, 2020 SCC 24 | November 14, 2019 | November 14, 2019 [16] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
R v K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55 | February 19, 2019 | November 15, 2019 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
R v Shlah, 2019 SCC 56 | November 15, 2019 | November 15, 2019 | V | |||||||||
Montréal (Ville) v. Octane Stratégie inc.,2019 SCC 57 | February 20, 2019 | November 22, 2019 | ||||||||||
Desgagnés Transport Inc. v Wärtsilä Canada Inc. , 2019 SCC 58 | January 24, 2019 | November 28, 2019 | ||||||||||
Kosoian v Société de transport de Montréal , 2019 SCC 59 | April 16, 2019 | November 29, 2019 | ||||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer |
R v Resolute FP Canada Inc., 2019 SCC 60 | March 28, 2019 | December 6, 2019 | ||||||||||
International Air Transport Association v Instrubel, N.V., 2019 SCC 61 | December 11, 2019 | December 11, 2019 | V | |||||||||
Yared v Karam, 2019 SCC 62 | March 19, 2019 | December 12, 2019 | ||||||||||
Canada (Attorney General) v. British Columbia Investment Management Corp., 2019 SCC 63 | May 13, 2019 | December 13, 2019 | ||||||||||
R v Collin,2019 SCC 64 | December 13, 2019 | December 13, 2019 | V | |||||||||
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov , 2019 SCC 65 | December 4, 2018 | December 19, 2019 | ||||||||||
Bell Canada v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 66 | December 4, 2018 | December 19, 2019 | ||||||||||
Canada Post Corp. v Canadian Union of Postal Workers, 2019 SCC 67 | December 10, 2018 | December 20, 2019 | ||||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin | Kasirer |
The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.
Gordon Fripp Henderson, was a Canadian intellectual property lawyer who joined the law firm Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP in 1937, and later became its chairman. He was known for his advocacy on intellectual property matters as well as his involvement in intellectual property organizations throughout his career. Henderson's contribution to the development of Canadian and international jurisprudence is described as one of the most significant in Canadian legal history.
Canada v Paul L'Anglais Inc. et al. [1983] 1 S.C.R. 147 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada constitutional decision on the jurisdiction of the superior courts to hear constitutional arguments. The unanimous court found that courts of inherent jurisdiction such as the Quebec Superior Court had concurrent jurisdiction to hear constitutional cases.
R v Parks, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 871 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal automatism defence.
Reference re ss. 193 & 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.) [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123, commonly known as the Prostitution Reference, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and on prostitution in Canada. Manitoba's Appeal Court had ruled the legislation violated the guarantee of freedom of expression in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, by constraining communication in relation to legal activity. The case was referred to the Supreme court.
The Privacy Act is the federal information-privacy legislation of Canada that came into effect on July 1, 1983. Administered by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Act sets out rules for how institutions of the Government of Canada collect, use, disclose, retain, and dispose of personal information of individuals.
Charkaoui v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of procedures for determining the reasonableness of a security certificate and for reviewing detention under a certificate. The Court held that the security certificate process, which prohibited the named individual from examining evidence used to issue the certificate, violated the right to liberty and habeas corpus under section 7, 9 and 10 of the Canadian Charter. The Court however rejected the appellant arguments that the extension of detentions violated the right against indefinite detention, that the differential treatment violated equality rights, and that the detention violated the rule of law. As remedy, the Court declared the "judicial confirmation of certificates and review of detention" to be of no force and effect, striking down articles 33 and 77 to 85 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, but suspended the ruling for one year.
Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta) [1987] 1 S.C.R. 313, commonly referred to as the Alberta Reference, was a leading opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to freedom of association under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that section 2(d) did not include the right to strike. In 2015, Alberta Reference was overruled, with the Court recognizing a right to strike in the Charter.
Imre Finta was the first person prosecuted under Canada's war crimes legislation. He was charged in 1987 and acquitted in 1990.
Mr. Big is a 2007 documentary directed and produced by Tiffany Burns and edited by Alec MacNeill Richardson. The documentary examines the "Mr. Big" undercover methods used by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). In these operations, RCMP officers pose as high-ranking gang criminals and develop relationships with the target involved. This is deliberate, as the relationship that is forged is ultimately used to determine what knowledge the target has of the crime(s) being investigated. "Mr. Big" operations have been credited with securing difficult convictions in a large number of cases, such as United States v. Burns, R v. Hart, and R v. Grandinetti, but concerns have been raised that they involve a risk of false confessions and wrongful convictions. Mr. Big includes interviews with targets of "Mr. Big" operations and their families, such as the Burns family, as well as interviews with various professionals who have an interest in the "Mr. Big" tactics, and RCMP footage of "Mr. Big" operations.
Thomas Albert Cromwell is a Canadian jurist and former Puisne Justice on the Supreme Court of Canada. After eleven years on the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Cromwell was nominated to succeed Michel Bastarache and occupy the seat traditionally reserved for Atlantic provinces on the Supreme Court of Canada by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and assumed office on December 22, 2008. Cromwell retired in September 2016, and was succeeded by Malcolm Rowe.
A Gladue report is a type of pre-sentencing and bail hearing report that a Canadian court can request when considering sentencing an offender of Indigenous background under Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code.
R v Hutt, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 476 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision. The Court held that for the activities of a prostitute or a customer to be of a criminal nature the conduct must conform with the ordinary dictionary meaning—i.e. The Oxford English Dictionary—since the word "solicit" was not defined in the Criminal Code.
Russell S. Brown is a former puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He was nominated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to replace outgoing justice Marshall Rothstein and served in the role starting on August 31, 2015. Prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court, he was a justice at the Alberta Court of Appeal, and before that a law professor at the University of Alberta. He resigned on June 12, 2023, prior to the completion of an investigation by the Canadian Judicial Council into alleged harassment.
Malliha Wilson is a Tamil Canadian lawyer who served as an Assistant Deputy Attorney General of the Government of Ontario from April 2008 to November 2016.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2018. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
Criminal sentencing in Canada is governed by the Canadian Criminal Code. The Criminal Code, along with the Supreme Court of Canada, have distinguished the treatment of Indigenous individuals within the Canadian Criminal Sentencing Regime.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2022. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
R v Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd. [2001] 3 SCR 209 is a Canadian labour law case concerning compulsory trade union membership in the Quebec construction industry. The Supreme Court of Canada considered the application of section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to the Quebec law in question. A divided Court affirmed the law's constitutionality.
Ontario v Fraser [2011] 2 SCR 3 is a Canadian labour law case concerning the protection of collective bargaining under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At issue was an Ontario law that created a separate labour relations regime for agricultural workers. The Court considered the standard for establishing a breach of section 2(d) in cases where government action is alleged to interfere with collective bargaining rights. A majority of the Court upheld the law, finding no breach of sections 2(d) or 15 of the Charter.