2019 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

Last updated

The table below lists the decisions (known as reasons) delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2019. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.

Contents

Reasons

  Delivered the Court's reason
  Joined the Court's reason
  Filed a concurrence
  Joined a concurrence
  Filed a dissent
  Joined a dissent
  Filed a concurrence/dissent
  Joined a concurrence/dissent
  Did not participate in the judgment
  Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment
  Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
  • Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram.
  • Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
  • Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered.
  • Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V"; per coram decisions delivered orally from the bench only note a "V" on the most senior justice on the panel.
  • An asterisk ( * ) in the Court's opinion denotes that it was only a majority in part or a plurality.
Case nameArguedDecided Wagner Abella Moldaver Karakatsanis Gascon Côté Brown Rowe Martin Kasirer
Frank v Canada (AG), 2019 SCC 1 [1] March 21, 2018January 11, 2019
R v Beaudry, 2019 SCC 2 [2] January 14, 2019January 14, 2019V
R v Fedyck, 2019 SCC 3 [3] January 15, 2019January 15, 2019
SA v Metro Vancouver Housing Corp, 2019 SCC 4 [4] April 25, 2018January 25, 2019
Orphan Well Association v Grant Thornton Ltd, 2019 SCC 5 [5] February 15, 2018January 31, 2019
R v Calnen, 2019 SCC 6 [6] February 12, 2018February 1, 2019
R v Bird, 2019 SCC 7 [7] March 16, 2018February 8, 2019
R v CJ, 2019 SCC 8 [8] February 12, 2019February 12, 2019V
R v Blanchard, 2019 SCC 9 [9] February 13, 2019February 13, 2019V
R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 [10] April 20, 2018February 14, 2019
Case nameArguedDecided Wagner Abella Moldaver Karakatsanis Gascon Côté Brown Rowe Martin Kasirer
R v Demedeiros, 2019 SCC 11 [11] February 14, 2019February 14, 2019V
R v George-Nurse, 2019 SCC 12 [12] February 15, 2019February 15, 2019V
Barer v Knight Brothers LLC , 2019 SCC 13 [13] April 24, 2018February 22, 2019
Salomon v Matte-Thompson, 2019 SCC 14 March 19, 2018February 28, 2019
R v Morrison, 2019 SCC 15 April 24, 2018March 15, 2019
R v Snelgrove, 2019 SCC 16 March 22, 2019March 22, 2019V
R v Kelsie, 2019 SCC 17March 27, 2019March 27, 2019
R v Myers, 2019 SCC 18 October 18, 2018March 28, 2019
TELUS Communications Inc v Wellman, 2019 SCC 19 November 6, 2018April 4, 2019
JW v Canada (AG), 2019 SCC 20 October 10, 2018April 12, 2019*
Case nameArguedDecided Wagner Abella Moldaver Karakatsanis Gascon Côté Brown Rowe Martin Kasirer
R v Thanabalasingham, 2019 SCC 21 April 17, 2019April 17, 2019V
R v Mills, 2019 SCC 22 May 25, 2018April 18, 2019121*3
R v JM, 2019 SCC 24 April 18, 2019April 18, 2019V
R v Larue, 2019 SCC 25 April 23, 2019April 23, 2019V
R v Wakefield, 2019 SCC 26 April 25, 2019April 25, 2019
R v WLS, 2019 SCC 27 April 26, 2019April 26, 2019V
Modern Cleaning Concept Inc v Comité paritaire de l'entretien d'édifices publics de la région de Québec, 2019 SCC 28 November 13, 2018May 3, 2019
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Chhina, 2019 SCC 29 November 14, 2018May 10, 2019
Christine DeJong Medicine Professional Corp v DBDC Spadina Ltd, 2019 SCC 30 May 14, 2019May 14, 2019V
Bessette v British Columbia (AG), 2019 SCC 31 November 15, 2019May 16, 2019
Case nameArguedDecided Wagner Abella Moldaver Karakatsanis Gascon Côté Brown Rowe Martin Kasirer
R v Omar, 2019 SCC 32 May 22, 2019May 22, 2019V
R v Barton, 2019 SCC 33 October 11, 2018May 24, 2019
R v Le, 2019 SCC 34 October 12, 2018May 31, 2019
L'Oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal v JJ, 2019 SCC 35 November 7, 2018June 7, 2019
1068754 Alberta Ltd. v. Québec (Agence du revenu), 2019 SCC 37 January 22, 2019June 27, 2019
R v Goldfinch, 2019 SCC 38 January 16, 2019June 28, 2019
R v Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39 February 21, 2019July 5, 2019
R v Stillman, 2019 SCC 40 March 26, 2019July 26, 2019
R v R.V., 2019 SCC 41 March 20, 2019July 31, 2019
Pioneer Corp. v Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42 December 11, 2018September 20, 2019
Case nameArguedDecided Wagner Abella Moldaver Karakatsanis Gascon Côté Brown Rowe Martin Kasirer
Keatley Surveying Ltd. v Teranet Inc. , 2019 SCC 43 March 29, 2019September 26, 2019
Denis v Côté, 2019 SCC 44 May 16, 2019September 27, 2019
Fleming v Ontario , 2019 SCC 45 March 21, 2019October 4, 2019
R v M.R.H., 2019 SCC 46 October 9, 2019October 9, 2019V
R v Poulin, 2019 SCC 47 March 25, 2019October 11, 2019
R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 October 16, 2019October 16, 2019 [14]
R v Kernaz, 2019 SCC 48 October 18, 2019October 18, 2019V
R.S. v P.R., 2019 SCC 49 January 21, 2019October 25, 2019
Threlfall v Carleton University, 2019 SCC 50 February 22, 2019October 31, 2019
Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Young, 2020 SCC 15 November 7, 2019November 7, 2019 [15]
Case nameArguedDecided Wagner Abella Moldaver Karakatsanis Gascon Côté Brown Rowe Martin Kasirer
R v Rafilovich, 2019 SCC 51 January 25, 2019November 8, 2019
R v James, 2019 SCC 52 November 8, 2019November 8, 2019V
Volkswagen Group Canada Inc. v Association québécoise de lutte contre la pollution atmosphérique, 2019 SCC 53 November 13, 2019November 13, 2019V
R v Javanmardi, 2019 SCC 54 May 15, 2019November 14, 2019
Michel v. Graydon, 2020 SCC 24 November 14, 2019November 14, 2019 [16] 1221
R v K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55 February 19, 2019November 15, 20191211
R v Shlah, 2019 SCC 56 November 15, 2019November 15, 2019V
Montréal (Ville) v. Octane Stratégie inc.,2019 SCC 57 February 20, 2019November 22, 2019
Desgagnés Transport Inc. v Wärtsilä Canada Inc. , 2019 SCC 58 January 24, 2019November 28, 2019
Kosoian v Société de transport de Montréal , 2019 SCC 59 April 16, 2019November 29, 2019
Case nameArguedDecided Wagner Abella Moldaver Karakatsanis Gascon Côté Brown Rowe Martin Kasirer
R v Resolute FP Canada Inc., 2019 SCC 60 March 28, 2019December 6, 2019
International Air Transport Association v Instrubel, N.V., 2019 SCC 61 December 11, 2019December 11, 2019V
Yared v Karam, 2019 SCC 62 March 19, 2019December 12, 2019
Canada (Attorney General) v. British Columbia Investment Management Corp., 2019 SCC 63 May 13, 2019December 13, 2019
R v Collin,2019 SCC 64 December 13, 2019December 13, 2019V
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov , 2019 SCC 65 December 4, 2018December 19, 2019
Bell Canada v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 66 December 4, 2018December 19, 2019
Canada Post Corp. v Canadian Union of Postal Workers, 2019 SCC 67 December 10, 2018December 20, 2019
Case nameArguedDecided Wagner Abella Moldaver Karakatsanis Gascon Côté Brown Rowe Martin Kasirer

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Canada</span> Highest court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gordon F. Henderson</span> Canadian lawyer (1912–1993)

Gordon Fripp Henderson, was a Canadian intellectual property lawyer who joined the law firm Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP in 1937, and later became its chairman. He was known for his advocacy on intellectual property matters as well as his involvement in intellectual property organizations throughout his career. Henderson's contribution to the development of Canadian and international jurisprudence is described as one of the most significant in Canadian legal history.

<i>Canada (Labour Relations Board) v Paul LAnglais Inc. et al.</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Canada v Paul L'Anglais Inc. et al. [1983] 1 S.C.R. 147 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada constitutional decision on the jurisdiction of the superior courts to hear constitutional arguments. The unanimous court found that courts of inherent jurisdiction such as the Quebec Superior Court had concurrent jurisdiction to hear constitutional cases.

<i>R v Parks</i> 1992 Canadian Supreme Court decision on automatism

R v Parks, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 871 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal automatism defence.

<i>Prostitution Reference</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Reference re ss. 193 & 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.) [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123, commonly known as the Prostitution Reference, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and on prostitution in Canada. Manitoba's Appeal Court had ruled the legislation violated the guarantee of freedom of expression in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, by constraining communication in relation to legal activity. The case was referred to the Supreme court.

<i>Privacy Act</i> (Canada) Canadian federal legislation (1983)

The Privacy Act is the federal information-privacy legislation of Canada that came into effect on July 1, 1983. Administered by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the Act sets out rules for how institutions of the Government of Canada collect, use, disclose, retain, and dispose of personal information of individuals.

<i>Charkaoui v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Charkaoui v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of procedures for determining the reasonableness of a security certificate and for reviewing detention under a certificate. The Court held that the security certificate process, which prohibited the named individual from examining evidence used to issue the certificate, violated the right to liberty and habeas corpus under section 7, 9 and 10 of the Canadian Charter. The Court however rejected the appellant arguments that the extension of detentions violated the right against indefinite detention, that the differential treatment violated equality rights, and that the detention violated the rule of law. As remedy, the Court declared the "judicial confirmation of certificates and review of detention" to be of no force and effect, striking down articles 33 and 77 to 85 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, but suspended the ruling for one year.

<i>Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act</i> (Alta) Judgement of the Supreme Court of Canada

Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta) [1987] 1 S.C.R. 313, commonly referred to as the Alberta Reference, was a leading opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to freedom of association under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that section 2(d) did not include the right to strike. In 2015, Alberta Reference was overruled, with the Court recognizing a right to strike in the Charter.

Imre Finta was the first person prosecuted under Canada's war crimes legislation. He was charged in 1987 and acquitted in 1990.

Mr. Big is a 2007 documentary directed and produced by Tiffany Burns and edited by Alec MacNeill Richardson. The documentary examines the "Mr. Big" undercover methods used by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). In these operations, RCMP officers pose as high-ranking gang criminals and develop relationships with the target involved. This is deliberate, as the relationship that is forged is ultimately used to determine what knowledge the target has of the crime(s) being investigated. "Mr. Big" operations have been credited with securing difficult convictions in a large number of cases, such as United States v. Burns, R v. Hart, and R v. Grandinetti, but concerns have been raised that they involve a risk of false confessions and wrongful convictions. Mr. Big includes interviews with targets of "Mr. Big" operations and their families, such as the Burns family, as well as interviews with various professionals who have an interest in the "Mr. Big" tactics, and RCMP footage of "Mr. Big" operations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Cromwell (jurist)</span> Canadian judge (born 1952)

Thomas Albert Cromwell is a Canadian jurist and former Puisne Justice on the Supreme Court of Canada. After eleven years on the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Cromwell was nominated to succeed Michel Bastarache and occupy the seat traditionally reserved for Atlantic provinces on the Supreme Court of Canada by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and assumed office on December 22, 2008. Cromwell retired in September 2016, and was succeeded by Malcolm Rowe.

A Gladue report is a type of pre-sentencing and bail hearing report that a Canadian court can request when considering sentencing an offender of Indigenous background under Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code.

R v Hutt, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 476 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision. The Court held that for the activities of a prostitute or a customer to be of a criminal nature the conduct must conform with the ordinary dictionary meaning—i.e. The Oxford English Dictionary—since the word "solicit" was not defined in the Criminal Code.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russell Brown (judge)</span> Canadian Supreme Court Justice (born 1965)

Russell S. Brown is a former puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He was nominated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to replace outgoing justice Marshall Rothstein and served in the role starting on August 31, 2015. Prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court, he was a justice at the Alberta Court of Appeal, and before that a law professor at the University of Alberta. He resigned on June 12, 2023, prior to the completion of an investigation by the Canadian Judicial Council into alleged harassment.

Malliha Wilson is a Tamil Canadian lawyer who served as an Assistant Deputy Attorney General of the Government of Ontario from April 2008 to November 2016.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2018. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.

Criminal sentencing in Canada is governed by the Canadian Criminal Code. The Criminal Code, along with the Supreme Court of Canada, have distinguished the treatment of Indigenous individuals within the Canadian Criminal Sentencing Regime.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2022. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.

<i>R v Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd</i> Canadian labour law case (SCC)

R v Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd. [2001] 3 SCR 209 is a Canadian labour law case concerning compulsory trade union membership in the Quebec construction industry. The Supreme Court of Canada considered the application of section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to the Quebec law in question. A divided Court affirmed the law's constitutionality.

<i>Ontario v Fraser</i> Canadian labour and constitutional law case

Ontario v Fraser [2011] 2 SCR 3 is a Canadian labour law case concerning the protection of collective bargaining under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At issue was an Ontario law that created a separate labour relations regime for agricultural workers. The Court considered the standard for establishing a breach of section 2(d) in cases where government action is alleged to interfere with collective bargaining rights. A majority of the Court upheld the law, finding no breach of sections 2(d) or 15 of the Charter.

References

  1. "Frank v. Canada (Attorney General) - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  2. "R. v. Beaudry - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  3. "R. v. Fedyck - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  4. "S.A. v. Metro Vancouver Housing Corp. - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  5. "Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Ltd. - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  6. "R. v. Calnen - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  7. "R. v. Bird - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  8. "R. v. C.J. - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  9. "R. v. Blanchard - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  10. "R. v. Jarvis - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  11. "R. v. Demedeiros - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  12. "R. v. George-Nurse - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  13. "Barer v. Knight Brothers LLC - SCC Cases (Lexum)". scc-csc.lexum.com. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  14. Reasons issued April 2, 2020.
  15. Reasons issued June 19, 2020.
  16. Reasons issued September 18, 2020.