 | This article may overuse or misuse color, making it hard to understand for color-blind users.(August 2023) |
The table below lists the decisions (known as reasons) delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2017. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
Delivered the Court's reason | Joined the Court's reason | Filed a concurrence | Joined a concurrence |
Filed a dissent | Joined a dissent | Filed a concurrence/dissent | Joined a concurrence/dissent |
Did not participate in the judgment | Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment | Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering | |
| |||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Abella | Cromwell | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Wagner | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernst v Alberta Energy Regulator , 2017 SCC 1 | January 12, 2016 | January 13, 2017 | * | ||||||||||
| R v Awer, 2017 SCC 2 | January 17, 2017 | January 17, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v Clark, 2017 SCC 3 | January 18, 2017 | January 18, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v Bédard, 2017 SCC 4 | January 19, 2017 | January 19, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v Natewayes, 2017 SCC 5 | January 19, 2017 | January 19, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association v British Columbia (AG), 2017 SCC 6 | October 11, 2016 | January 26, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 | October 5, 2016 | January 27, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Nelson (City) v Mowatt, 2017 SCC 8 | October 7, 2016 | February 17, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Clifford, 2017 SCC 9 | February 17, 2017 | February 17, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v Brown, 2017 SCC 10 | February 20, 2017 | February 20, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Abella | Cromwell | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Wagner | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
| R v Olutu, 2017 SCC 11 | February 21, 2017 | February 21, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v Bingley, 2017 SCC 12 | October 13, 2016 | February 23, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Peers, 2017 SCC 13 | February 14, 2017 | February 24, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Aitkens, 2017 SCC 14 | February 14, 2017 | February 24, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Paterson, 2017 SCC 15 | November 2, 2016 | March 17, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v SB, 2017 SCC 16 | March 21, 2017 | March 21, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v Oland, 2017 SCC 17 | October 31, 2016 | March 23, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Godbout v Pagé, 2017 SCC 18 | October 6, 2016 | March 24, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Co v Émond, 2017 SCC 19 | March 29, 2017 | March 29, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| Green v Law Society of Manitoba, 2017 SCC 20 | November 9, 2016 | March 30, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Abella | Cromwell | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Wagner | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
| R v Savard, 2017 SCC 21 | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| Ostiguy v Allie, 2017 SCC 22 | October 7, 2016 | April 6, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Pintea v Johns, 2017 SCC 23 | April 18, 2017 | April 18, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| Lajeunesse (Re), 2017 SCC 24 | April 20, 2017 | April 20, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v Hunt, 2017 SCC 25 | April 25, 2017 | April 25, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v George, 2017 SCC 38 | April 28, 2017 | April 28, 2017 [1] | |||||||||||
| Quebec (Criminal and Penal Prosecutions) v Jodoin, 2017 SCC 26 | December 5, 2016 | May 12, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Antic, 2017 SCC 27 | December 2, 2016 | June 1, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28 | January 16, 2017 | June 2, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Pellerin Savitz LLP v Guindon , 2017 SCC 29 | February 22, 2017 | June 9, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Abella | Cromwell | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Wagner | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
| Stewart v Elk Valley Coal Corp, 2017 SCC 30 | December 9, 2016 | June 15, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Cody, 2017 SCC 31 | April 15, 2017 | June 16, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Teal Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 | November 1, 2016 | June 22, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Douez v Facebook, Inc, 2017 SCC 33 | November 4, 2016 | June 23, 2017 | * | * | * | ||||||||
| Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc , 2017 SCC 34 | December 6, 2016 | June 28, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 | November 3, 2016 | June 29, 2017 | |||||||||||
| AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2017 SCC 36 | November 8, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Alex, 2017 SCC 37 | December 8, 2016 | July 6, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Wilson v Alharayeri , 2017 SCC 39 | November 29, 2016 | July 13, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Clyde River (Hamlet) v Petroleum Geo-Services Inc, 2017 SCC 40 | November 30, 2016 | July 26, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Abella | Cromwell | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Wagner | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
| Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v Enbridge Pipelines Inc, 2017 SCC 41 | November 30, 2016 | July 26, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Québec (AG) v Guérin, 2017 SCC 42 | January 11, 2017 | July 27, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Uniprix inc v Gestion Gosselin et Bérubé inc, 2017 SCC 43 | January 12, 2017 | July 28, 2017 | |||||||||||
| India v Badesha, 2017 SCC 44 | March 20, 2017 | September 8, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Durham Regional Crime Stoppers Inc, 2017 SCC 45 | January 30, 2017 | September 22, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Canada (AG) v Thouin, 2017 SCC 46 | May 24, 2017 | September 28, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Canada (AG) v Fontaine, 2017 SCC 47 | May 25, 2017 | October 6, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Montréal (City) v Dorval, 2017 SCC 48 | February 23, 2017 | October 13, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Bourgeois, 2017 SCC 49 | October 13, 2017 | October 13, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50 | January 13, 2017 | October 19, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Abella | Cromwell | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Wagner | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
| Teva Canada Ltd v TD Canada Trust, 2017 SCC 51 | February 24, 2017 | October 27, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Robinson, 2017 SCC 52 | October 30, 2017 | October 30, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| R v Millington, 2017 SCC 53 | October 30, 2017 | October 30, 2017 | V | ||||||||||
| Ktunaxa Nation v British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations), 2017 SCC 54 | December 1, 2016 | November 2, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Association of Justice Counsel v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 55 | April 19, 2017 | November 3, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Barreau du Québec v Québec (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 56 | March 27, 2017 | November 10, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Sciascia, 2017 SCC 57 | April 24, 2017 | November 23, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Magoon, 2018 SCC 14 | November 27, 2017 | November 27, 2017 [2] | |||||||||||
| R v Jordan, 2018 SCC 14 | November 27, 2017 | November 27, 2017 [3] | |||||||||||
| First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun v Yukon, 2017 SCC 58 | March 22, 2017 | December 1, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Abella | Cromwell | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Wagner | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
| R v Marakah, 2017 SCC 59 | March 23, 2017 | December 8, 2017 | |||||||||||
| R v Jones, 2017 SCC 60 | March 23, 2017 | December 8, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Cowper-Smith v Morgan, 2017 SCC 61 | May 26, 2017 | December 14, 2017 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
| British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal v Schrenk, 2017 SCC 62 | March 28, 2017 | December 15, 2017 | |||||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Abella | Cromwell | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Wagner | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
On December 15, 2017, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin retired. Richard Wagner was sworn in as Chief Justice on December 18, 2017.
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Wagner | Abella | Moldaver | Karakatsanis | Gascon | Côté | Brown | Rowe | Martin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deloitte & Touche v Livent Inc (Receiver of) , 2017 SCC 63 | February 15, 2017 | December 20, 2017 | ||||||||||
| R v Boutilier, 2017 SCC 64 | May 23, 2017 | December 21, 2017 |
An associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States is any justice of the Supreme Court of the United States other than the chief justice of the United States. The number of associate justices is eight, as set by the Judiciary Act of 1869.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point of U.S. Constitutional or federal law. It also has original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, specifically "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party." The court holds the power of judicial review, the ability to invalidate a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution. It is also able to strike down presidential directives for violating either the Constitution or statutory law. However, it may act only within the context of a case in an area of law over which it has jurisdiction. The court may decide cases having political overtones, but has ruled that it does not have power to decide non-justiciable political questions.
This page serves as an index of lists of United States Supreme Court cases. The United States Supreme Court is the highest federal court of the United States.
The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.
The Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial authority and the highest court of the Republic of India. It is the final court of appeal for all civil and criminal cases in India. It also has the power of judicial review. The Supreme Court, which consists of the Chief Justice of India and a maximum of fellow 33 judges, has extensive powers in the form of original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions.
The Supreme Court of California is the highest and final court of appeals in the courts of the U.S. state of California. It is headquartered in San Francisco at the Earl Warren Building, but it regularly holds sessions in Los Angeles and Sacramento. Its decisions are binding on all other California state courts. Since 1850, the court has issued many influential decisions in a variety of areas including torts, property, civil and constitutional rights, and criminal law.
The Supreme Court (Filipino: Kataas-taasang Hukuman; colloquially referred to as the Korte Suprema is the highest court in the Philippines. The Supreme Court was established by the Second Philippine Commission on June 11, 1901 through the enactment of its Act No. 136, an Act which abolished the Real Audiencia de Manila, the predecessor of the Supreme Court.
The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) is an independent body of the European Union (EU) with juridical personality, established under the Treaty of Lisbon between 22 of the 27 states of the EU following the method of enhanced cooperation. It is based in Kirchberg, Luxembourg City alongside the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Auditors (ECA).
The Wisconsin Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in Wisconsin. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over original actions, appeals from lower courts, and regulation or administration of the practice of law in Wisconsin.
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia is the state supreme court of the state of West Virginia, the highest of West Virginia's state courts. The court sits primarily at the West Virginia State Capitol in Charleston, although from 1873 to 1915, it was also required by state law to hold sessions in Charles Town in the state's Eastern Panhandle. The court also holds special sittings at various locations across the state.
The Colorado Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S. state of Colorado. Located in Denver, the Court consists of a Chief Justice and six Associate Justices.
The Chief Justice of Malaysia, also known as the chief justice of the Federal Court, is the office and title of the head of the Malaysian judiciary system. The title has been in use since 1994, and prior to this it was known as the lord president of the Federal Court. The chief justice is the head of the Federal Court, the apex court of Malaysia. It is the highest position in Malaysian judicial system followed by the president of the Court of Appeal of Malaysia, chief judge of Malaya, and the chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak.
The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is a sub-agency of the United States Department of Justice whose chief function is to conduct removal proceedings in immigration courts and adjudicate appeals arising from the proceedings. These administrative proceedings determine the removability and admissibility of individuals in the United States. As of January 19, 2023, there were sixty-eight immigration courts and three adjudication centers throughout the United States.
Dipak Misra is an Indian jurist who served as the 45th Chief Justice of India from 28 August 2017 till 2 October 2018. He is also former Chief Justice of the Patna High Court and Delhi High Court. He is the nephew of Justice Ranganath Misra, who was the 21st Chief Justice from 1990 to 1991.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2014. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2015. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2020. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2021. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.