2002 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

Last updated

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2002. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

Contents

Of the 86 judgments released in 2002, 10 were oral, 56 were unanimous, and none were motions.

Judgments and reasons

Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3; 2002 SCC 1 May 11, 2001January 11, 2002
Ahani v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 72; 2002 SCC 2 May 11, 2001January 11, 2002
Chieu v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 84; 2002 SCC 3 October 10, 2000January 11, 2002
Al Sagban v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 133; 2002 SCC 4 October 10, 2000January 11, 2002
R v Benji , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 142; 2002 SCC 5 January 15, 2002January 15, 2002V
R v Tessier , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 144; 2002 SCC 6 January 18, 2002January 18, 2002V
Bank of Montreal v Dynex Petroleum Ltd , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 146; 2002 SCC 7 November 9, 2001January 24, 2002
Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 558 v Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages (West) Ltd , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 156; 2002 SCC 8 October 31, 2001January 24, 2002
Krangle (Guardian ad litem of) v Brisco , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 205; 2002 SCC 9 October 3, 2001January 24, 2002
R v Law , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 227; 2002 SCC 10 October 4, 2001February 7, 2002
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
Moreau-Bérubé v New Brunswick (Judicial Council) , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 249; 2002 SCC 11 June 19, 2001February 7, 2002
R v Regan , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 297; 2002 SCC 12 March 15, 2001February 14, 2002
Mackin v New Brunswick (Minister of Finance); Rice v New Brunswick , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 405; 2002 SCC 13 May 23, 2001February 14, 2002
R v Guignard , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 472; 2002 SCC 14 October 3, 2001February 21, 2002
St-Jean v Mercier , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 491; 2002 SCC 15 April 18, 2001February 21, 2002
R v Fliss , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 535; 2002 SCC 16 April 23, 2001February 21, 2002
Ward v Canada (AG) , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 569; 2002 SCC 17 October 31, 2001February 22, 2002
Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595; 2002 SCC 18 December 14, 2000February 22, 2002
Performance Industries Ltd v Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 678; 2002 SCC 19 December 14, 2000February 22, 2002
Bannon v Thunder Bay (City of) , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 716; 2002 SCC 20 February 21, 2002February 21, 2002V
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
Goulet v Transamerica Life Insurance Co of Canada , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 719; 2002 SCC 21 November 8, 2001March 8, 2002
Oldfield v Transamerica Life Insurance Co of Canada , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 742; 2002 SCC 22 November 8, 2001March 8, 2002
Lavoie v Canada , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 769; 2002 SCC 23 June 12, 2001March 8, 200212
R v Mac , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 856; 2002 SCC 24 March 14, 2002March 14, 2002V
R v Lamy , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 860; 2002 SCC 25 February 12, 2002March 21, 2002
R v Sheppard , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869; 2002 SCC 26 June 21, 2001March 21, 2002
R v Braich , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 903; 2002 SCC 27 June 21, 2001March 21, 2002
Sarvanis v Canada , [2002] 1 S.C.R. 921; 2002 SCC 28 October 10, 2001March 21, 2002
R v Cinous , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 3; 2002 SCC 29 April 18, 2001March 21, 2002
Smith v Co-operators General Insurance Co , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 129; 2002 SCC 30 November 6, 2001March 28, 2002
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
Kitkatla Band v British Columbia (Minister of Small Business, Tourism and Culture) , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 146; 2002 SCC 31 November 2, 2001March 28, 2002
R v Brown , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 185; 2002 SCC 32 January 23, 2002March 28, 2002
Housen v Nikolaisen , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; 2002 SCC 33 October 2, 2001March 28, 2002
Théberge v Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain inc , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 336; 2002 SCC 34 October 11, 2001March 28, 2002
R v Carlos , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 411; 2002 SCC 35 April 17, 2002April 17, 2002V
R v VCAS , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 414; 2002 SCC 36 April 17, 2002April 17, 2002
R v SGF , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 416; 2002 SCC 37 April 22, 2002April 22, 2002V
Gronnerud (Litigation Guardians of) v Gronnerud Estate , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 417; 2002 SCC 38 December 6, 2001April 25, 2002
R v Hibbert , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 445; 2002 SCC 39 [ permanent dead link ]October 10, 2001April 25, 2002
Berry v Pulley , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 493; 2002 SCC 40 October 30, 2001April 25, 2002
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
Sierra Club of Canada v Canada (Minister of Finance) , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 522; 2002 SCC 41 November 6, 2001April 26, 2002
Bell Express Vu Limited Partnership v Rex , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559; 2002 SCC 42 December 4, 2001April 26, 2002
Bank of America Canada v Mutual Trust Co , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 601; 2002 SCC 43 December 11, 2001April 26, 2002
Tremblay v Syndicat des employées et employés professionnels-les et de bureau, section locale 57 , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 627; 2002 SCC 44 February 13, 2002April 26, 2002
R v Robicheau , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 643; 2002 SCC 45 May 21, 2002May 21, 2002V
Stewart v Canada , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 645; 2002 SCC 46 December 12, 2001May 23, 2002
Walls v Canada , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 684; 2002 SCC 47 December 12, 2001May 23, 2002
Family Insurance Corp v Lombard Canada Ltd , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 695; 2002 SCC 48 February 19, 2002May 23, 2002
First Vancouver Finance v MRN , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 720; 2002 SCC 49 March 12, 2002May 23, 2002
Heredi v Fensom , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 741; 2002 SCC 50 February 18, 2002May 23, 2002
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
R v Perciballi , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 761; 2002 SCC 51 [ permanent dead link ]June 11, 2002June 11, 2002V
RC v Quebec (AG); R v Beauchamps , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 762; 2002 SCC 52 May 13, 2002June 20, 2002
Lavigne v Canada (Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages) , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 773; 2002 SCC 53 January 17, 2002June 20, 2002
Ross River Dena Council Band v Canada , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 816; 2002 SCC 54 December 11, 2001June 20, 2002
R v Burke , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 857; 2002 SCC 55 March 12, 2002June 21, 2002
R v Handy , [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908; 2002 SCC 56 October 9, 2001June 21, 2002
Babcock v Canada (AG) , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 3; 2002 SCC 57 February 20, 2002July 11, 2002
R v Shearing , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 33; 2002 SCC 58 October 9, 2001July 18, 2002
Somersall v Friedman , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 109; 2002 SCC 59 January 21, 2002August 8, 2002
CIBC Mortgage Corp v Vasquez , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 168; 2002 SCC 60 February 12, 2002September 12, 2002
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz v Canada (AG); White, Ottenheimer & Baker v Canada (AG); R v Fink , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 209; 2002 SCC 61 [1] December 13, 2001September 12, 2002
Schreiber v Canada (AG) , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 269; 2002 SCC 62 April 16, 2002September 12, 2002
Canam Enterprises Inc v Coles , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 307; 2002 SCC 63 October 8, 2002October 8, 2002V
R v Hall , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 309; 2002 SCC 64 April 23, 2002October 10, 2002
Krieger v Law Society of Alberta , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 372; 2002 SCC 65 May 17, 2002October 10, 2002
B v Ontario (Human Rights Commission) , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 403; 2002 SCC 66 May 14, 2002October 31, 2002
R v Noël , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 433; 2002 SCC 67 [ permanent dead link ]May 14, 2002October 31, 2002
Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 519; 2002 SCC 68 December 10, 2001October 31, 2002
R v Wilson , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 629; 2002 SCC 69 October 31, 2002October 31, 2002V
R v Neil , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 631; 2002 SCC 70 January 25, 2002November 1, 2002
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
Macdonell v Quebec (Commission d'accès à l'information) , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 661; 2002 SCC 71 January 22, 2002November 1, 2002
Quebec (AG) v Laroche , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 708; 2002 SCC 72 January 16, 2002November 21, 2002
R v Jarvis , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 757; 2002 SCC 73 June 13, 2002November 21, 2002
R v Ling , [2002] 3 S.C.R. 814; 2002 SCC 74 June 13, 2002November 21, 2002
Ruby v Canada (Solicitor General) , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 3; 2002 SCC 75 April 24, 2002November 21, 2002
Harvard College v Canada (Commissioner of Patents) , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 45; 2002 SCC 76 May 21, 2002December 5, 2002
Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation Ltd , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153; 2002 SCC 77 February 14, 2002December 5, 2002
Spar Aerospace Ltd v American Mobile Satellite Corp , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 205; 2002 SCC 78 June 11, 2002December 6, 2002
Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 245; 2002 SCC 79 December 6, 2001December 6, 2002
R v Harvey , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 311; 2002 SCC 80 December 11, 2002December 11, 2002V
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinL'Heureux-
Dubé
GonthierIacobucciMajorBastaracheBinnieArbourLeBelDeschamps
373409 Alberta Ltd (Receiver of) v Bank of Montreal , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 312; 2002 SCC 81 October 1, 2002December 12, 2002
R v Squires , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 323; 2002 SCC 82 December 12, 2002December 12, 2002V
Nova Scotia (AG) v Walsh , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 325; 2002 SCC 83 March 13, 2002December 19, 2002
Gosselin v Québec (AG) , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429; 2002 SCC 84 October 29, 2001December 19, 200211111
2

2

2
13
4

3

3
Prud'homme v Prud'homme , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 663; 2002 SCC 85 March 13, 2002December 20, 2002
Chamberlain v Surrey School District No 36 , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710; 2002 SCC 86 June 12, 2002December 20, 2002

Justices of the Supreme Court

JusticeReasons writtenVotes cast % Majority
Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin
11

1

1

1

Total=14
53

0

1

2

Total=56
65 of 70 (92.86%)
Puisne Justice Claire L'Heureux-Dubé (retired July 1, 2002)
2

0

2

5

Total=09
45

2

3

3

Total=53
49 of 62 (79.03%)
Puisne Justice Charles Gonthier
7

2

0

3

Total=12
58

0

2

2

Total=62
67 of 74 (90.54%)
Puisne Justice Frank Iacobucci
22

0

0

1

Total=23
54

0

0

2

Total=56
76 of 79 (96.2%)
Puisne Justice John C. Major
12

0

0

0

Total=12
58

0

0

7

Total=65
70 of 77 (90.91%)
Pusine Justice Michel Bastarache
10

0

1

5

Total=16
58

0

0

4

Total=62
68 of 78 (87.18%)
Puisne Justice Ian Binnie
11

0

0

4

Total=15
63

0

0

3

Total=66
74 of 81 (91.36%)
Pusine Justice Louise Arbour
8

4

1

2

Total=15
60

0

1

3

Total=64
72 of 79 (91.14%)
Pusine Justice Louis LeBel
13

3

1

3

Total=20
58

1

0

4

Total=63
75 of 83 (90.36%)
Pusine Justice Marie Deschamps (appointed August 7, 2002)
0

0

0

0

Total=00
3

0

0

0

Total=03
3 of 3 (100%)
This

Notes on statistics:

  • A justice is only included in the majority if they have joined or concurred in the Court's judgment in full. Percentages are based only on the cases in which a justice participated, and are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.

Table key

  Delivered the Court's reason
  Joined the Court's reason
  Filed a concurrence
  Joined a concurrence
  Filed a dissent
  Joined a dissent
  Filed a concurrence/dissent
  Joined a concurrence/dissent
  Did not participate in the judgment
  Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
  • Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram.
  • Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
  • Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered.
  • Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V"; per coram decisions delivered orally from the bench only note a "V" on the most senior justice on the panel.
  • An asterisk ( * ) in the Court's opinion denotes that it was only a majority in part or a plurality.

Related Research Articles

In law, a summary judgment is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Summary judgments may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case. The formulation of the summary judgment standard is stated in somewhat different ways by courts in different jurisdictions. In the United States, the presiding judge generally must find there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." In England and Wales, the court rules for a party without a full trial when "the claim, defence or issue has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a trial."

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2005. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2006. A total of 59 judgments were published. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2004. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2003. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2001. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2000. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1999. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1998. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2007. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1997. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2008. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2009. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2010. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2011. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2012. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2013. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2014. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2015. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2020. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.

References

  1. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-06-14. Retrieved 2006-09-01.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)