 | This article may overuse or misuse color, making it hard to understand for color-blind users.(August 2023) |
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2007. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions. [1]
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kingstreet Investments Ltd v Province of New Brunswick (Department of Finance) , 2007 SCC 1 | June 20, 2006 | January 11, 2007 | x | ||||||||
| Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue) , 2007 SCC 2 | April 19, 2006 | January 19, 2007 | |||||||||
| Double N Earthmovers Ltd v Edmonton (City) , 2007 SCC 3 | June 16, 2006 | January 25, 2007 | |||||||||
| McGill University Health Centre (Montreal General Hospital) v Syndicat des employés de l'Hôpital général de Montréal , 2007 SCC 4 | April 12, 2006 | January 26, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Beaudry , 2007 SCC 5 | May 12, 2006 | January 31, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Trochym , 2007 SCC 6 | May 9, 2006 | February 1, 2007 | |||||||||
| Resurfice Corp v Hanke , 2007 SCC 7 | December 12, 2006 | February 8, 2007 | |||||||||
| Dickie v Dickie , 2007 SCC 8 | January 17, 2007 | February 9, 2007 | |||||||||
| Charkaoui v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2007 SCC 9 | June 13, 2006 | February 23, 2007 | |||||||||
| Canada (AG) v Hislop , 2007 SCC 10 | May 16, 2006 | March 1, 2007 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
| R v Spencer , 2007 SCC 11 | October 17, 2006 | March 8, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Bryan , 2007 SCC 12 | October 16, 2006 | March 15, 2007 | |||||||||
| Phoenix Bulk Carriers Ltd v Kremikovtzi Trade , 2007 SCC 13 | February 14, 2007 | March 16, 2007 | |||||||||
| Lévis (City) v Fraternité des policiers de Lévis Inc , 2007 SCC 14 | November 7, 2006 | March 22, 2007 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Council of Canadians with Disabilities v Via Rail Canada Inc , 2007 SCC 15 | may 19. 2006 | March 23, 2007 | |||||||||
| Ambroise Joseph McKay v Her Majesty the Queen , 2007 SCC 16 | March 23, 2007 | ||||||||||
| Pecore v Pecore , 2007 SCC 17 | December 6, 2006 | May 3, 2007 | |||||||||
| Madsen Estate v Saylor , 2007 SCC 18 | December 7, 2006 | May 3, 2007 | |||||||||
| Dunne v Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue) , 2007 SCC 19 | February 21, 2007 | May 10, 2007 | |||||||||
| Impulsora Turistica de Occidente, SA de CV v Transat Tours Canada Inc , 2007 SCC 20 | April 25. 2007 | May 25, 2007 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
| British Columbia (AG) v Christie , 2007 SCC 21 | March 21, 2007 | May 25, 2007 | |||||||||
| Canadian Western Bank v Alberta , 2007 SCC 22 | April 11, 2006 | May 31, 2007 | |||||||||
| British Columbia (AG) v Lafarge Canada Inc , 2007 SCC 23 | November 8, 2005 | May 31, 2007 | |||||||||
| Strother v 3464920 Canada Inc , 2007 SCC 24 | October 11, 2006 | June 1, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Teskey , 2007 SCC 25 | February 22, 2007 | June 7, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Hape , 2007 SCC 26 | October 12, 2006 | June 7, 2007 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Health Services and Support - Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn v British Columbia , 2007 SCC 27 | February 8, 2006 | June 8, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Couture , 2007 SCC 28 | May 15, 2006 | June 15, 2007 | |||||||||
| London (City) v RSJ Holdings Inc , 2007 SCC 29 | November 15, 2006 | June 21, 2007 | |||||||||
| Canada (AG) v JTI-Macdonald Corp , 2007 SCC 30 | February 19, 2007 | June 28, 2007 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
| Baier v Alberta , 2007 SCC 31 | November 9, 2006 | June 29, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Clayton , 2007 SCC 32 | June 19. 2006 | July 6, 2007 | |||||||||
| Canada v Addison & Leyen Ltd , 2007 SCC 33 | May 24, 2007 | July 12, 2007 | |||||||||
| Dell Computer Corp v Union des consommateurs , 2007 SCC 34 | December 13, 2006 | July 13, 2007 | |||||||||
| Rogers Wireless Inc v Muroff , 2007 SCC 35 | December 14, 2006 | July 13, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Steele , 2007 SCC 36 | April 27, 2007 | July 20, 2007 | |||||||||
| Euro-Excellence Inc v Kraft Canada Inc , 2007 SCC 37 | January 16, 2007 | July 27, 2007 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Syl Apps Secure Treatment Centre v BD , 2007 SCC 38 | April 26, 2007 | July 27, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Rhyason , 2007 SCC 39 | May 17, 2007 | July 27, 2007 | |||||||||
| Alliance for Marriage and Family v AA , 2007 SCC 40 | September 13, 2007 | ||||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
| Hill v Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board , 2007 SCC 41 | November 10, 2006 | October 4, 2007 | |||||||||
| AYSA Amateur Youth Soccer Association v Canada (Revenue Agency) , 2007 SCC 42 | May 16, 2007 | October 4, 2007 | |||||||||
| Named Person v Vancouver Sun , 2007 SCC 44 | April 24, 2007 | October 11, 2007 | |||||||||
| Kerr v Danier Leather Inc , 2007 SCC 45[ permanent dead link ] | March 20, 2007 | October 12, 2007 | |||||||||
| Citadel General Assurance Co v Vytlingam , 2007 SCC 46 | December 11, 2006 | October 19, 2007 | |||||||||
| Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co v Herbison , 2007 SCC 47 | December 11, 2006 | October 19, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Singh , 2007 SCC 48 | May 23, 2007 | November 1, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Trotta , 2007 SCC 49 | October 12, 2007 | November 8, 2007 | |||||||||
| ABB Inc v Domtar Inc , 2007 SCC 50 | November 8, 2006 | November 22, 2007 | |||||||||
| Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
| R v Grover , 2007 SCC 51 | November 6, 2007 | November 22, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Jackson , 2007 SCC 52 | October 19, 2007 | December 6, 2007 | |||||||||
| R v Daley , 2007 SCC 53 | May 18, 2007 | December 13, 2007 | |||||||||
| Bruker v Marcovitz , 2007 SCC 54 | December 5, 2006 | December 14, 2007 | |||||||||
| Jedfro Investments (USA) Ltd v Jacyk , 2007 SCC 55 | October 11, 2007 | December 20, 2007 | |||||||||
In the Westminster parliamentary system, an early day motion (EDM) is a motion, expressed as a single sentence, tabled by a member of Parliament, which the Government has not yet scheduled for debate.
In law, a summary judgment, also referred to as judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition, is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Summary judgments may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case. The formulation of the summary judgment standard is stated in somewhat different ways by courts in different jurisdictions. In the United States, the presiding judge generally must find there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." In England and Wales, the court rules for a party without a full trial when "the claim, defence or issue has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a trial."
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2005. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2006. A total of 59 judgments were published. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2004. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2003. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2002. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2001. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2000. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1999. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1998. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1997. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2008. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2009. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2010. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2011. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2012. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2013. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2014. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2015. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
Delivered the Court's reason | Joined the Court's reason | Filed a concurrence | Joined a concurrence |
Filed a dissent | Joined a dissent | Filed a concurrence/dissent | Joined a concurrence/dissent |
Did not participate in the judgment | Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment | Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering | |
| |||