This article may overuse or misuse color, making it hard to understand for color-blind users.(August 2023) |
The list below consists of the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1995. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
Delivered the Court's reason | Joined the Court's reason | Filed a concurrence | Joined a concurrence |
Filed a dissent | Joined a dissent | Filed a concurrence/dissent | Joined a concurrence/dissent |
Did not participate in the judgment | Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment | Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering | |
|
Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ontario v. Canadian Pacific Ltd., [1995] 2 SCR 1028 | January 24, 1995 | January 24, 1995 | |||||||||
Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Matsqui Indian Band, [1995] 1 SCR 3 | October 11, 1994 | January 26, 1995 | |||||||||
Winnipeg Condominium Corporation No. 36 v. Bird Construction Co., [1995] 1 SCR 85 | October 12, 1994 | January 26, 1995 | |||||||||
Stewart v. Pettie , [1995] 1 SCR 131 | October 13, 1994 | January 26, 1995 | |||||||||
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Canada (Labour Relations Board) , [1995] 1 SCR 157 | March 14, 1994 | January 27, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Dunn, [1995] 1 SCR 226 | October 31, 1994 | January 27, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Bernshaw, [1995] 1 SCR 254 | October 7, 1994 | January 27, 1995 | |||||||||
B. (R.) v. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, [1995] 1 SCR 315 | March 17, 1994 | January 27, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Halcrow, [1995] 1 SCR 440 | March 17, 1994 | January 27, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Laporte, [1995] 1 SCR 442 | January 27, 1995 | January 27, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Blenner-Hassett; R. v. Piluke, [1995] 1 SCR 443 | January 31, 1995 | January 31, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. S. (R.J.), [1995] 1 SCR 451 | February 28 and March 1, 1994 | February 2, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Simpson, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 449 | February 3, 1995 | February 3, 1995 | |||||||||
T. (M.) v. A. (H.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 445 | February 6, 1995 | February 6, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Lord, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 747 | February 21, 1995 | February 21, 1995 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
R. v. B. (W.R.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 750 | February 22, 1995 | February 22, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Barrett, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 752 | February 22, 1995 | February 22, 1995 | |||||||||
White Resource Management Ltd. v. Durish, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 633 | October 6, 1994 | February 23, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Lepage, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 654 | November 10, 1994 | February 23, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. McIntosh, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 686 | November 28, 1994 | February 23, 1995 | |||||||||
Chen v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) - [1995] 1 S.C.R. 725 | February 3, 1995 | February 23, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Chaplin, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 727 | October 6, 1994 | February 23, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Stinchcombe, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 754 | February 23, 1995 | February 23, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Moore, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 756 | February 24, 1995 | February 24, 1995 | V | ||||||||
R. v. D. (W.R.) - [1995] 1 S.C.R. 758 | February 28, 1995 | February 28, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Biddle, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 761 | October 14, 1994 | March 2, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. St. Pierre, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 791 | December 2, 1994 | March 2, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Tempelaar - [1995] 1 S.C.R. 760 | March 3, 1995 | March 3, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Goddard - [1995] 1 S.C.R. 854 | March 20, 1995 | March 20, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Hawrish - [1995] 1 S.C.R. 856 | March 21, 1995 | March 21, 1995 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
R. v. MacGillivray - [1995] 1 S.C.R. 890 | February 23, 1995 | March 30, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Crawford - [1995] 1 S.C.R. 858 | November 4, 1994 | March 30, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Curragh Inc. - [1995] 1 S.C.R. 900 | April 5, 1995 | April 5, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Mills, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 902 | April 12, 1995 | April 12, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Jobin, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 78 | February 28 and March 1, 1994 | April 13, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Primeau, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 60 | February 28 and March 1, 1994 | April 13, 1995 | |||||||||
British Columbia Securities Commission v. Branch, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 3 | February 28 and March 1, 1994 | April 13, 1995 | |||||||||
Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd. v. Royal Bank of Canada - [1995] 2 S.C.R. 187 | March 1, 1995 | May 4, 1995 | |||||||||
Phillips v. Nova Scotia (Commission of Inquiry into the Westray Mine Tragedy) - [1995] 2 S.C.R. 97 | May 31 and June 1, 1994 | May 4, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Keegstra, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 381 | February 6, 1995 | May 18, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Tanner - [1995] 2 S.C.R. 379 | April 26, 1995 | May 18, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Silveira, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 297 | November 9, 1994 | May 18, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Burlingham - [1995] 2 S.C.R. 206 | November 9, 1994 | May 18, 1995 | |||||||||
Walker v. Prince Edward Island - [1995] 2 S.C.R. 407 | May 23, 1995 | May 23, 1995 | |||||||||
Miron v. Trudel , [1995] 2 SCR 418 | June 2, 1994 | May 25, 1995 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
Egan v. Canada , [1995] 2 SCR 513 | November 1, 1994 | May 25, 1995 | |||||||||
Thibaudeau v. Canada , [1995] 2 SCR 627 | October 4, 1994 | May 25, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. S. (G.), [1995] 2 SCR 411 | May 26, 1995 | May 26, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. B. (A.J.), [1995] 2 SCR 413 | May 29, 1995 | May 29, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. M. (N.), [1995] 2 SCR 415 | May 30, 1995 | May 30, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Montour, [1995] 2 SCR 416 | May 30, 1995 | May 30, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Wade, [1995] 2 SCR 737 | June 2, 1995 | June 2, 1995 | |||||||||
British Columbia Telephone Co. v. Shaw Cable Systems (B.C.) Ltd., [1995] 2 SCR 739 | January 23, 1995 | June 22, 1995 | |||||||||
Telecommunications Workers Union v. Canada (Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission), [1995] 2 SCR 781 | January 23, 1995 | June 22, 1995 | |||||||||
Crown Forest Industries Ltd. v. Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 802 | March 2, 1995 | June 22, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Park , [1995] 2 SCR 836 | December 7, 1994 | June 22, 1995 | |||||||||
Vout v. Hay, [1995] 2 SCR 876 | January 26, 1995 | June 22, 1995 | |||||||||
British Columbia (Milk Board) v. Grisnich, [1995] 2 SCR 895 | April 25, 1995 | June 22, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Crosby, [1995] 2 SCR 912 | April 24, 1995 | June 22, 1995 | |||||||||
Weber v. Ontario Hydro , [1995] 2 SCR 929 | December 6, 1994 | June 29, 1995 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
New Brunswick v. O'Leary, [1995] 2 SCR 967 | December 6, 1994 | June 29, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Hibbert , [1995] 2 SCR 973 | January 30, 1995 | July 20, 1995 | |||||||||
Ontario v. Canadian Pacific Ltd., [1995] 2 SCR 1031 | January 24, 1995 | July 20, 1995 | |||||||||
Cie minière Québec Cartier v. Quebec (Grievances arbitrator), [1995] 2 SCR 1095 | May 5, 1995 | July 20, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Collins; R. v. Pelfrey, [1995] 2 SCR 1104 | June 12, 1995 | July 20, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Chaisson, [1995] 2 SCR 1118 | June 15, 1995 | July 20, 1995 | |||||||||
Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto , [1995] 2 SCR 1130 | February 20, 1995 | July 20, 1995 | |||||||||
Botiuk v. Toronto Free Press Publications Ltd., [1995] 3 SCR 3 | December 8, 1994 | September 21, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Pontes, [1995] 3 SCR 44 | February 28, 1995 | September 21, 1995 | |||||||||
Friesen v. Canada, [1995] 3 SCR 103 | March 1, 1995 | September 21, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Cleghorn, [1995] 3 SCR 175 | April 24, 1995 | September 21, 1995 | |||||||||
RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) , [1995] 3 SCR 199 | November 29, 30, 1994 | September 21, 1995 | |||||||||
G. (L.) v. B. (G.), [1995] 3 SCR 370 | March 2, 1995 | September 21, 1995 | |||||||||
Amos v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [1995] 3 SCR 405 | May 25, 1995 | September 21, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Wijesinha, [1995] 3 SCR 422 | May 31, 1995 | September 21, 1995 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
Cohnstaedt v. University of Regina, [1995] 3 SCR 451 | October 12, 1995 | October 12, 1995 | |||||||||
Husky Oil Operations Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue , [1995] 3 SCR 453 | January 25, 1995 | October 19, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Harrer, [1995] 3 SCR 562 | March 3, 1995 | October 19, 1995 | |||||||||
Chan v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1995] 3 SCR 593 | January 31, 1995 | October 19, 1995 | |||||||||
Ter Neuzen v. Korn, [1995] 3 SCR 674 | February 2, 1995 | October 19, 1995 | |||||||||
Large v. Stratford (City), [1995] 3 SCR 733 | February 27, 1995 | October 19, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. U. (F.J.) , [1995] 3 SCR 764 | April 26, 1995 | October 19, 1995 | |||||||||
Fire v. Longtin, [1995] 4 SCR 3 | October 4, 1995 | October 19, 1995 | |||||||||
Blair v. Consolidated Enfield Corp., [1995] 4 SCR 5 | March 21, 1995 | October 19, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Patriquen, [1995] 4 SCR 42 | October 30, 1995 | October 30, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Polo, [1995] 4 SCR 44 | November 2, 1995 | November 2, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Mathieu, [1995] 4 SCR 46 | November 2, 1995 | November 2, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Fleurant, [1995] 4 SCR 47 | November 2, 1995 | November 2, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Rogalsky, [1995] 4 SCR 48 | November 7, 1995 | November 7, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Marc, [1995] 4 SCR 50 | November 7, 1995 | November 7, 1995 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
R. v. W. (A.), [1995] 4 SCR 51 | November 10, 1995 | November 10, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Munroe, [1995] 4 SCR 53 | November 10, 1995 | November 10, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Jorgensen , [1995] 4 SCR 55 | February 21, 1995 | November 16, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Livermore, [1995] 4 SCR 123 | March 22, 1995 | November 16, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Fitzpatrick, [1995] 4 SCR 154 | March 22, 1995 | November 16, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. K. (B.), [1995] 4 SCR 186 | October 3, 1995 | November 16, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Khela, [1995] 4 SCR 201 | May 24, 1995 | November 16, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Shropshire , [1995] 4 SCR 227 | June 15, 1995 | November 16, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Brydon, [1995] 4 SCR 253 | October 11, 1995 | November 16, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Hinse, [1995] 4 SCR 597 | October 2, 1995 | November 30, 1995 | |||||||||
Ruffo v. Conseil de la magistrature, [1995] 4 SCR 267 | March 23, 1995 | December 14, 1995 | |||||||||
Blueberry River Indian Band v. Canada (Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development), [1995] 4 SCR 344 | June 13, 14, 1995 | December 14, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. O'Connor , [1995] 4 SCR 411 | February 1, 1995 | December 14, 1995 | |||||||||
A. (L.L.) v. B. (A.), [1995] 4 SCR 536 | June 16, 1995 | December 14, 1995 | |||||||||
P. (M.) v. L.B. (G.), [1995] 4 SCR 592 | December 7, 1995 | December 14, 1995 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | Lamer | La Forest | L'Heureux-Dubé | Sopinka | Gonthier | Cory | McLachlin | Iacobucci | Major |
MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Simpson, [1995] 4 SCR 725 | June 12, 1995 | December 14, 1995 | |||||||||
Hollis v. Dow Corning Corp., [1995] 4 SCR 634 | February 2, 1995 | December 21, 1995 | |||||||||
R. v. Adams, [1995] 4 SCR 707 | October 6, 1995 | December 21, 1995 |
A play-by-mail game is a game played through postal mail, email, or other digital media. Correspondence chess and Go were among the first PBM games. Diplomacy has been played by mail since 1963, introducing a multi-player aspect to PBM games. Flying Buffalo Inc. pioneered the first commercially available PBM game in 1970. A small number of PBM companies followed in the 1970s, with an explosion of hundreds of startup PBM companies in the 1980s at the peak of PBM gaming popularity, many of them small hobby companies—more than 90 percent of which eventually folded. A number of independent PBM magazines also started in the 1980s, including The Nuts & Bolts of PBM, Gaming Universal, Paper Mayhem and Flagship. These magazines eventually went out of print, replaced in the 21st century by the online PBM journal Suspense and Decision.
A chief executive officer (CEO) is the highest officer charged with the management of an organization – especially a company or nonprofit institution.
Oscar De La Hoya is an American boxing promoter and former professional boxer who competed from 1992 to 2008. His accolades include winning 11 world titles in six weight classes, including lineal championships in three weight classes. De La Hoya was nicknamed "The Golden Boy of boxing" by the media when he represented the United States at the 1992 Summer Olympics where, shortly after having graduated from James A. Garfield High School, he won a gold medal in the lightweight division, and reportedly "set a sport back on its feet."
George Edward Foreman is an American former professional boxer, entrepreneur, minister, and author. In boxing, he competed between 1967 and 1997 and was nicknamed "Big George". He is a two-time world heavyweight champion and an Olympic gold medalist. As an entrepreneur, he is known for the George Foreman Grill.
In psychology, decision-making is regarded as the cognitive process resulting in the selection of a belief or a course of action among several possible alternative options. It could be either rational or irrational. The decision-making process is a reasoning process based on assumptions of values, preferences and beliefs of the decision-maker. Every decision-making process produces a final choice, which may or may not prompt action.
The Supreme Court of Ireland is the highest judicial authority in Ireland. It is a court of final appeal and exercises, in conjunction with the Court of Appeal and the High Court, judicial review over Acts of the Oireachtas. The Supreme Court also has appellate jurisdiction to ensure compliance with the Constitution of Ireland by governmental bodies and private citizens. It sits in the Four Courts in Dublin.
Jerome Young is an American former track and field sprinter who specialized in the 400-meter dash. He won gold medals with the United States 4 × 400-meter relay team at the 2001 World Championships in Athletics and 1997 World Championships in Athletics, but was later stripped of these medals due to doping and was ultimately banned from the sport. He also was the heats runner for the relay team at the 2000 Summer Olympics, where the Americans won gold, but this medal was rescinded as well.
Pierre Mazeaud is a French jurist, politician and alpinist.
Jean-Marc Gilbert Mormeck is a French former professional boxer who competed from 1995 to 2014. He is a two-time unified world cruiserweight champion, having held the WBA, WBC and The Ring world titles twice between 2005 and 2007. He was the first boxer to hold unified cruiserweight title since Evander Holyfield in 1988, and the first fighter to hold The Ring cruiserweight title since Carlos De León in 1987. He was ranked by BoxRec as the world's top 10 cruiserweight from 2001 to 2005 and in 2007, and was ranked No.1 in 2003 and 2004. Mormeck also challenged for the unified world heavyweight title in 2012.
The United States Reports are the official record of the Supreme Court of the United States. They include rulings, orders, case tables, in alphabetical order both by the name of the petitioner and by the name of the respondent, and other proceedings. United States Reports, once printed and bound, are the final version of court opinions and cannot be changed.
The National Assembly of Armenia, also informally referred to as the Parliament of Armenia is the legislative branch of the government of Armenia.
UFC: The Ultimate Ultimate was an event held by the Ultimate Fighting Championship on December 16, 1995, at the Mammoth Gardens in Denver, Colorado. The event was seen live on pay-per view in the United States, and later released on home video.
Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case that tested the extent of software copyright. The lower court had held that copyright does not extend to the user interface of a computer program, such as the text and layout of menus. Due to the recusal of one justice, the Supreme Court decided the case with an eight-member bench split evenly, leaving the lower court's decision affirmed but setting no national precedent.
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that states cannot impose qualifications for prospective members of the U.S. Congress stricter than those the Constitution specifies. The decision invalidated 23 states' Congressional term limit provisions. The parties to the case were U.S. Term Limits, a nonprofit advocacy group, and Arkansas politician Ray Thornton, among others.
The Threatened Species Protection Act 1995, is an act of the Parliament of Tasmania that provides the statute relating to conservation of flora and fauna. Its long title is An Act to provide for the protection and management of threatened native flora and fauna and to enable and promote the conservation of native flora and fauna. It received the royal assent on 14 November 1995.
The 1994–95 Meistriliiga was the fourth season of the Meistriliiga, Estonia's premier football league. Flora won their second title.
Assembly elections 1995 was held in Maharashtra, India in two phases on February 12, 1995, and March 9, 1995. Election results were declared on March 13, 1995. The major parties were Bharatiya Janata Party - Shiv Sena Yuti (alliance) against the Congress.
United States v. Alfonso D. Lopez, Jr., 514 U.S. 549 (1995), was a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court that struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (GFSZA) as it was outside of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. It was the first case since 1937 in which the Court held that Congress had exceeded its power under the Commerce Clause.
The law of Michigan consists of several levels, including constitutional, statutory, regulatory and case law. The Michigan Compiled Laws form the general statutory law.