Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Arbour

Last updated

This is a list of all the reasons written by Louise Arbour during her tenure as puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. During her time on the Court she wrote 68 reasons.

Contents

1999

Case nameIssueCo-authored byJoined by
R v Pelletier
[1999] 3 SCR 863
Common Bawdy-house None McLachlin, Major and Arbour JJ.

2000

Louise Arbour 2000 statistics
?
Majority or Plurality
?
Concurrence
?
Other
?
Dissent
?
Concurrence/dissentTotal = ??
Written reasons= ?Oral reasons= ?Unanimous reasons= ?
Case nameIssueCo-authored byJoined by
R v Biniaris
[2000] 1 SCR 381; 2000 SCC 15
R v Molodowic
[2000] 1 SCR 420; 2000 SCC 16
R v AG
[2000] 1 SCR 439; 2000 SCC 17
R v Wust
[2000] 1 SCR 455; 2000 SCC 18
R v Arthurs
[2000] 1 SCR 481; 2000 SCC 19
R v Arrance
[2000] 1 SCR 488; 2000 SCC 20
R v Oickle
[2000] 2 SCR 3; 2000 SCC 38
R v Morrisey
[2000] 2 SCR 90; 2000 SCC 39
R v Lévesque
[2000] 2 SCR 487; 2000 SCC 47
Winnipeg Child and Family Services v KLW
[2000] 2 SCR 519; 2000 SCC 48
R v Charlebois
[2000] 2 SCR 674; 2000 SCC 53
R v Knoblauch
[2000] 2 SCR 780; 2000 SCC 58

2001

Louise Arbour 2001 statistics
?
Majority or Plurality
0
Concurrence
0
Other
0
Dissent
0
Concurrence/dissentTotal = ??
Written reasons= ?Oral reasons= 1Unanimous reasons= ?
Case nameIssueCo-authored byJoined by
o R v Guttman
[2001] 1 SCR 363; 2001 SCC 8
United States of America v Kwok
[2001] 1 SCR 532; 2001 SCC 18
United States of America v Cobb
[2001] 1 SCR 587; 2001 SCC 19
United States of America v Tsioubris
[2001] 1 SCR 613; 2001 SCC 20
United States of America v Shulman
[2001] 1 SCR 616; 2001 SCC 21
R v Pan; R v Sawyer
[2001] 2 SCR 344; 2001 SCC 42
Ivanhoe inc v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 500
[2001] 2 SCR 565; 2001 SCC 47
Sept-Îles (City) v Quebec (Labour Court)
[2001] 2 SCR 670; 2001 SCC 48
R v Rhee
[2001] 3 SCR 364; 2001 SCC 71
R v Nette
[2001] 3 SCR. 488; 2001 SCC 78
R v Golden
[2001] 3 SCR 679; 2001 SCC 83
R v Khan
[2001] 3 SCR 823; 2001 SCC 86

2002

Louise Arbour 2002 statistics
?
Majority or Plurality
?
Concurrence
?
Other
?
Dissent
?
Concurrence/dissentTotal = ??
Written reasons= ?Oral reasons= ?Unanimous reasons= ?
Case nameIssueCo-authored byJoined by
o R v Benji
[2002] 1 SCR 142; 2002 SCC 5
Moreau-Bérubé v New Brunswick (Judicial Council)
[2002] 1 SCR 249; 2002 SCC 11
R v Fliss
[2002] 1 SCR 535; 2002 SCC 16
Lavoie v Canada
[2002] 1 SCR 769; 2002 SCC 23
R v Lamy
[2002] 1 SCR 860; 2002 SCC 25
R v Cinous
[2002] 2 SCR 3; 2002 SCC 29
R v Brown
[2002] 2 S.C.R. 185; 2002 SCC 32
o R v Carlos
[2002] 2 SCR 411; 2002 SCC 35
Gronnerud (Litigation Guardians of) v Gronnerud Estate
[2002] 2 SCR 417; 2002 SCC 38
R v Hibbert
[2002] 2 SCR 445; 2002 SCC 39 [ permanent dead link ]
R v Burke
[2002] 2 SCR 857; 2002 SCC 55
Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz v Canada (AG); White, Ottenheimer & Baker v Canada (AG); R v Fink
[2002] 3 SCR 209; 2002 SCC 61
R v Noël
[2002] 3 SCR 433; 2002 SCC 67 [ permanent dead link ]
Ruby v Canada (Solicitor General)
[2002] 4 SCR 3; 2002 SCC 75
Gosselin v Québec (AG)
[2002] 4 SCR 429; 2002 SCC 84

2003

Louise Arbour 2003 statistics
?
Majority or Plurality
?
Concurrence
?
Other
?
Dissent
?
Concurrence/dissentTotal = 22
Written reasons= ?Oral reasons= ?Unanimous reasons= ?
Case nameIssueCo-authored byJoined by
o R v Feeley
[2003] 1 SCR 64; 2003 SCC 7
o R v Knight; R v Hay
[2003] 1 SCR 156; 2003 SCC 15
R v Arradi
[2003] 1 SCR 280; 2003 SCC 23
Miglin v Miglin
[2003] 1 SCR 303; 2003 SCC 24
Bastarache J.
R v Buhay
[2003] 1 SCR 631; 2003 SCC 30
R v Owen
[2003] 1 SCR 779; 2003 SCC 33
Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada
[2003] 2 SCR 259; 2003 SCC 45
R v Johnson
[2003] 2 SCR 357; 2003 SCC 46
R v Edgar
[2003] 2 SCR 388; 2003 SCC 47
R v Smith
[2003] 2 SCR 392; 2003 SCC 48
R v Mitchell
[2003] 2 SCR 396; 2003 SCC 49
R v Kelly
[2003] 2 SCR 400; 2003 SCC 50
KLB v British Columbia
[2003] 2 SCR 403; 2003 SCC 51
EDG v Hammer
[2003] 2 SCR 459; 2003 SCC 52
MB v British Columbia
[2003] 2 SCR 477; 2003 SCC 53
R v SAB
[2003] 2 SCR 678; 2003 SCC 60
Doucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia (Minister of Education)
[2003] 3 SCR 3; 2003 SCC 62
Iacobucci J. McLachlin C.J., Gonthier and Bastarache JJ.
Toronto (City) v Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79
[2003] 3 SCR 77; 2003 SCC 63
Ontario v Ontario Public Sector Employees Union
[2003] 3 SCR 149; 2003 SCC 64
o Vann Niagara Ltd v Oakville (Town)
[2003] 3 SCR 158; 2003 SCC 65 [ permanent dead link ]
R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine
[2003] 3 SCR 571; 2003 SCC 74
R v Clay
[2003] 3 S.C.R. 735; 2003 SCC 75

2004

Louise Arbour 2004 statistics
?
Majority or Plurality
?
Concurrence
?
Other
?
Dissent
?
Concurrence/dissentTotal = 6
Written reasons= ?Oral reasons= ?Unanimous reasons= ?
Case nameIssueCo-authored byJoined by
Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG)
[2004] 1 SCR 76; 2004 SCC 4
Transport North American Express Inc v New Solutions Financial Corp
[2004] 1 SCR 249; 2004 SCC 7
Hamilton v Open Window Bakery Ltd
[2004] 1 SCR 303; 2004 SCC 9
Monsanto Canada Inc v Schmeiser
[2004] 1 SCR 902; 2004 SCC 34
Application under s 83.28 of the Criminal Code (Re)
[2004] 2 S.C.R. 248; 2004 SCC 42
Iacobucci J.
Vancouver Sun (Re)
[2004] 2 SCR 332; 2004 SCC 43
Iacobucci J.

Related Research Articles

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. It struck down many U.S. federal and state abortion laws, and prompted an ongoing national debate in the United States about whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role of religious and moral views in the political sphere should be. Roe v. Wade reshaped American politics, dividing much of the United States into abortion rights and anti-abortion movements, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.

Supreme Court of Canada Highest court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.

Sophia of Nassau Queen consort of Sweden

Sophia of Nassau was Queen of Sweden and Norway as the wife of King Oscar II. She was Queen of Sweden for 35 years, longer than anyone before her, and the longest-serving queen until 2011, when she was surpassed by Queen Silvia. She is also the most recent woman to have been officially Dowager Queen of Sweden.

Kaikeyi Major character in the epic Ramayana

Kaikeyi was the second consort of King Dasharatha and the Queen of Ayodhya in the Hindu epic, the Ramayan. Out of Dashrath's three wives, Kaikeyi had the most significant role. She was the princess of Kekeya and a powerful warrior, who helped her husband during a war. Kaikeyi was the mother of Bharat. Initially loving and motherly towards her stepson, Ram, Kaikeyi's mind was poisoned by Manthara, her maid. Under her influence, Kaikeyi sent Ram to the forest.

Marie Leszczyńska Queen consort of France

Maria Karolina Zofia Felicja Leszczyńska, also known as Marie Leczinska, was a Polish princess and Queen consort of France from 1725 until 1768 by marriage to Louis XV. The daughter of King Stanislaus I of Poland and Catherine Opalińska, her 42-year service was the longest of any queen in French history. A devout Roman Catholic throughout her life, Marie was popular among the French people for her generosity and introduced many Polish customs to the royal court at Versailles. She was the grandmother of Louis XVI, Louis XVIII and Charles X of France.

Claire L'Heureux-Dubé is a retired Canadian judge who served as a puisne justice on the Supreme Court of Canada from 1987 to 2002. She was the first woman from Quebec and the second woman appointed to this position, after Bertha Wilson. Previously, she had been one of the first woman lawyers to handle divorce cases, and was the first woman appointed as a judge to the Quebec Superior Court and the Quebec Court of Appeal.

Priscilla Owen American judge

Priscilla Richman Owen is the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. She was previously a Justice of the Texas Supreme Court.

Caroline Matilda of Great Britain Queen consort of Denmark and Norway

Caroline Matilda of Great Britain was a Queen of Denmark and Norway from 1766 to 1772 by marriage to King Christian VII.

Sonia Sotomayor United States Supreme Court justice

Sonia Maria Sotomayor is an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. She was nominated by President Barack Obama on May 26, 2009 and has served since August 8, 2009. She is the third woman to hold the position. Sotomayor is the first woman of color, first Hispanic, and first Latina member of the Court.

Bowen v. Roy, 476 U.S. 693 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case which established limits on freedom of religion in the United States.

Princess Augusta of Great Britain Duchess consort of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel

Princess Augusta Frederica of Great Britain was a British princess, granddaughter of King George II and the only elder sibling of King George III. She was the duchess of Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel by marriage to Charles William Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick. Her daughter Caroline was the spouse of King George IV.

Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987), is a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the First Amendment, specifically whether the protection of the First Amendment extends to government employees who make extremely critical remarks about the President. The Court ruled that, while direct threats on the President's life would not be protected speech, a comment — even an unpopular or seemingly extreme one — made on a matter of public interest and spoken by a government employee with no policymaking function and a job with little public interaction, would be protected.

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2006. A total of 59 judgments were published. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

This is a list of all the reasons written by Rosalie Abella during her tenure as puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.

Rice v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding a prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge to remove a young African American woman, Juror 16, from a defendant's drug trial jury in a California court case, based on her youth and on her alleged "eye rolling" in answer to a question. The defendant, Steven Martell Collins, challenged the striking of Juror 16, saying her exclusion was based on race, but the trial judge agreed that the prosecutor's reasons were race-neutral. The California Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's ruling, and the Federal District Court dismissed Collins' habeas corpus petition with prejudice. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, stating that the dismissal was unreasonable based, among other reasons, on the lack of evidence that the eye rolling had occurred.

The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2010. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

This is a list of all the reasons written by Justice Karakatsanis during her tenure as puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.

Christiane Völling is the first intersex person known to have successfully sued for damages in a case brought for non-consensual surgical intervention described as a non-consensual sex reassignment. She was awarded €100,000 by the Regional Court of Cologne.

Toyotomi Sadako

Toyotomi Sadako was a Japanese noble woman from the Sengoku period and Edo period. She was a daughter of Toyotomi Hidekatsu and Oeyo. In 1609 she ascended to the status of Kita no Mandokoro. Due to being directly linked to prominent figures of his time, she was inducted into the Junior Third Rank of the Imperial Court (Jusanmi), one of the highest honors that could be conferred by the Emperor of Japan.