This article may overuse or misuse color, making it hard to understand for color-blind users.(August 2023) |
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2006. A total of 59 judgments were published. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions. [1]
The Globe and Mail remarked that this year was the lowest number of judgments released in at least 25 years. [2] It was noted that this appears to be a part of a similar trend seen in the US Supreme Court and House of Lords.
Delivered the Court's reason | Joined the Court's reason | Filed a concurrence | Joined a concurrence |
Filed a dissent | Joined a dissent | Filed a concurrence/dissent | Joined a concurrence/dissent |
Did not participate in the judgment | Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment | Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering | |
|
Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canada (Human Rights Commission) v Canadian Airlines International Ltd , [2006] 1 S.C.R. 3; 2006 SCC 1 | October 19, 2005 | January 26, 2006 | |||||||||
Isidore Garon ltée v Tremblay; Fillion et Frères (1976) inc v Syndicat national des employés de garage du Québec inc , [2006] 1 S.C.R. 27; 2006 SCC 2 | February 16, 2005 | January 27, 2006 | X | ||||||||
Young v Bella , [2006] 1 S.C.R. 108; 2006 SCC 3 | October 20, 2005 | January 27, 2006 | X | X | |||||||
ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd v Alberta (Energy & Utilities Board) , [2006] 1 S.C.R. 140; 2006 SCC 4 | May 11, 2005 | February 9, 2006 | x | ||||||||
Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Vancouver (City) , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 5 | November 9, 2005 | February 23, 2006 | |||||||||
Multani v Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 6 | April 12, 2005 | March 2, 2006 | 2 | 1 | 1 | X | |||||
Mazzei v British Columbia (Director of Adult Forensic Psychiatric Services) , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 7 | November 14, 2005 | March 16, 2006 | X | ||||||||
R v Pittiman , 1 S.C.R. ; 2006 SCC 9 | February 10, 2006 | March 23, 2006 | |||||||||
R v Lavigne , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 10 | December 8, 2005 | March 30, 2006 | X | ||||||||
R v Chaisson , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 11 | March 15, 2005 | March 30, 2006 | X | ||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
Lévis (City) v Tétreault; Lévis (City) v 2629-4470 Québec inc , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 12 | October 21, 2005 | April 13, 2006 | X | ||||||||
HJ Heinz Co of Canada Ltd v Canada (AG) , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 13 | November 7, 2005 | April 21, 2006 | |||||||||
Tranchemontagne v Ontario (Director, Disability Support Program) , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 14 | December 12, 2005 | April 21, 2006 | X | ||||||||
R v Rodgers , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 15 | November 15, 2005 | April 27, 2006 | x | ||||||||
R v Graveline , 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 16 | March 14, 2006 | April 27, 2006 | X | ||||||||
R v Gagnon , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 17 | March 16, 2006 | May 4, 2006 | X | X | |||||||
Childs v Desormeaux , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 18 | January 18, 2006 | May 5, 2006 | |||||||||
Bisaillon v Concordia University , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 19 | December 14, 2005 | May 18, 2006 | X | ||||||||
Placer Dome Canada Ltd v Ontario (Minister of Finance) , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 20 | November 17, 2005 | May 25, 2006 | X | ||||||||
Jesuit Fathers of Upper Canada v Guardian Insurance Co of Canada , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 21 | January 10, 2006 | June 1, 2006 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
Mattel, Inc v 3894207 Canada Inc , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 22 | October 18, 2005 | June 2, 2006 | |||||||||
Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v Boutiques Cliquot Ltée , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 23 | October 18, 2005 | June 2, 2006 | |||||||||
Canada 3000 Inc, Re; Inter‑Canadian (1991) Inc (Trustee of) , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 24 | January 16, 17, 2006 | June 9, 2006 | x | ||||||||
Leskun v Leskun , _ S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 25 | February 15, 2006 | June 21, 2006 | |||||||||
R v BWP; R v BVN , 2006 SCC 27 | November 10, 2005 | June 22, 2006 | |||||||||
Buschau v Rogers Communications Inc , 2006 SCC 28 | November 15, 2005 | June 22, 2006 | X | ||||||||
Fidler v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada , 2006 SCC 30 | December 6, 2005 | June 29, 2006 | x | ||||||||
Goodis v Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services) , 2006 SCC 31 | April 18, 2006 | July 7, 2006 | X | ||||||||
R v Boulanger , 2006 SCC 32 | April 18, 2006 | July 13, 2006 | X | ||||||||
United States of America v Ferras; United States of America v Latty , 2006 SCC 33 | October 17, 2005 | July 21, 2006 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
United Mexican States v Ortega; United States of America v Fiessel , 2006 SCC 34 | March 23, 2006 | July 21, 2006 | X | ||||||||
GMAC Commercial Credit Corporation - Canada v TCT Logistics Inc , 2006 SCC 35 | November 16, 2005 | July 27, 2006 | x | ||||||||
Celanese Canada Inc v Murray Demolition Corp , 2006 SCC 36 | December 12, 2005 | July 27, 2006 | X | ||||||||
DBS v SRG; LJW v TAR; Henry v Henry; Hiemstra v Hiemstra , 2006 SCC 37 | February 13, 2006 | July 31, 2006 | x | ||||||||
Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice) , 2006 SCC 39 | December 13, 2005 | September 8, 2006 | |||||||||
R v Kong , 2006 SCC 40 | June 22, 2006 | September 8, 2006 | X/R | ||||||||
Isen v Simms , 2006 SCC 41 | June 21, 2006 | October 5, 2006 | X | ||||||||
R v Hazout , 2006 SCC 42 | June 22, 2006 | October 5, 2006 | |||||||||
Robertson v Thomson Corp , 2006 SCC 43 | Dec. 6, 2005/Apr. 18, 2006 | October 12, 2006 | x | x | |||||||
R v Shoker , 2006 SCC 44 | February 14, 2006 | October 13, 2006 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
Walker v Ritchie , 2006 SCC 45 | May 10, 2006 | October 13, 2006 | X | ||||||||
Imperial Oil Ltd v Canada; Inco Ltd v Canada , 2006 SCC 46 | February 7, 2006 | October 20, 2006 | X | ||||||||
R v Krieger , 2006 SCC 47 | January 12, 2006 | October 26, 2006 | X | ||||||||
Pharmascience Inc v Binet , 2006 SCC 48 | May 9, 2006 | October 26, 2006 | X | ||||||||
AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Canada (Minister of Health) , 2006 SCC 49 | May 11, 2006 | November 3, 2006 | X | ||||||||
Fédération des producteurs acéricoles du Québec v Regroupement pour la commercialisation des produits de l'érable inc , 2006 SCC 50 | June 19, 2006 | November 9, 2006 | |||||||||
Pro Swing Inc v Elta Golf Inc , 2006 SCC 52 | December 5, 2005 | November 17, 2006 | |||||||||
R v Déry , 2006 SCC 53 | February 16, 2006 | November 23, 2006 | X | ||||||||
R v Sappier; R v Gray , 2006 SCC 54 | May 17, 2006 | December 7, 2006 | |||||||||
R v Angelillo , 2006 SCC 55 | December 8, 2005 | December 8, 2006 | |||||||||
Case name | Argued | Decided | McLachlin | Bastarache | Binnie | LeBel | Deschamps | Fish | Abella | Charron | Rothstein |
R v Larche , 2006 SCC 56 | November 8, 2005 | December 8, 2006 | |||||||||
R v Khelawon , 2006 SCC 57 | December 16, 2005 | December 14, 2006 | |||||||||
McDiarmid Lumber Ltd v God's Lake First Nation , 2006 SCC 58 | April 20, 2006 | December 15, 2006 | |||||||||
R v Morris , 2006 SCC 59 | October 14, 2005 | December 21, 2006 | X | X | |||||||
Justice | Reasons written | Votes cast | % Majority | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin |
|
| 41 of 48 | ||||||||||
Puisne Justice Michel Bastarache |
|
| 44 of 48 | ||||||||||
Puisne Justice Ian Binnie |
|
| 42 of 48 | ||||||||||
Puisne Justice Louis LeBel |
|
| 43 of 47 | ||||||||||
Pusine Justice Marie Deschamps |
|
| 41 of 45 | ||||||||||
Puisne Justice Morris Fish |
|
| 50 of 58 | ||||||||||
Pusine Justice Rosalie Abella |
|
| 44 of 48 | ||||||||||
Pusine Justice Louise Charron |
|
| 45 of 48 | ||||||||||
Pusine Justice Marshall Rothstein (began March 1, 2006) |
|
| 10 of 10 (100%) | ||||||||||
Notes on statistics:
|
The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.
In law, a judgment is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.
William Ian Corneil Binnie is a former puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, serving from January 8, 1998 to October 27, 2011. Of the justices appointed to the Supreme Court in recent years, he is one of the few appointed directly from private practice. On his retirement from the Court, he was described by The Globe and Mail as "arguably the country's premier judge", by La Presse as "probably the most influential judge in Canada of the last decade" and by the Toronto Star as “one of the strongest hands on the court.”
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2005. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2004. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2003. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2002. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2001. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2000. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1999. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1998. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2007. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1997. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2008. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2009. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
The table below lists decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2010. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.
Michael Moldaver is a former Canadian judge. He was a puisne justice on the Supreme Court of Canada from his 2011 appointment by former Prime Minister Stephen Harper until his retirement in 2022. Before his elevation to the nation's top court, he served as a judge at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal for Ontario for over 20 years. A former criminal lawyer, Moldaver is considered an expert in both Canadian criminal law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Hryniak v Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 is a landmark case of the Supreme Court of Canada that supports recent reforms to Canadian civil procedure in the area of granting summary judgment in civil cases.
Russell S. Brown is a former puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He was nominated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to replace outgoing justice Marshall Rothstein and served in the role starting on August 31, 2015. Prior to his appointment to the Supreme Court, he was a justice at the Alberta Court of Appeal, and before that a law professor at the University of Alberta. He resigned on June 12, 2023, prior to the completion of an investigation by the Canadian Judicial Council into alleged harassment.
The table below lists the decisions delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2022. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason.