List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Laskin Court)

Last updated

This is a chronological list of notable cases decided by the Supreme Court of Canada from the appointment of Bora Laskin in 1973 as Chief Justice to his death in office in 1984. Laskin was the first Chief Justice to hear cases under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms implemented in 1982.

Contents

1973 1974

Case nameCitationDateSubject
December 27, 1973  Bora Laskin is appointed as Chief Justice of Canada
Calder v British Columbia (AG) [1973] SCR 313January 31, 1973Aboriginal rights
Jordan House Hotel Ltd v Menow [1974] SCR 239commercial host liability
Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O'Malley [1974] SCR 592June 29, 1973corporate director's fiduciary duties
Canada (AG) v Lavell [1974] SCR 1349August 27, 1973equality, Bill of Rights
Moran v Pyle National (Canada) Ltd [1975] 1 SCR 393Conflict of laws
Murdoch v Murdoch [1975] 1 SCR 423Division of matrimonial property

1975 1979

Case nameCitationDateSubject
Kienapple v R [1975] 1 SCR 729the "kienapple" principle of multiple criminal charges
Jones v New Brunswick (AG) [1975] 2 SCR 182validity of Official Languages Act
Interprovincial Cooperatives Ltd v R (1975), [1976] 1 SCR 477constitutional extraterritoriality
Morgentaler v R [1976] 1 SCR 616March 26, 1975abortion
Harrison v Carswell [1976] 2 SCR 200pre-Charter right to protest
Morgan v Prince Edward Island (AG) [1976] 2 SCR 349limiting right to own land
Reference Re Anti-Inflation Act [1976] 2 SCR 373July 12, 1976 peace, order and good government power
MacDonald v Vapor Canada Ltd [1977] 2 SCR 134constitutionality of the Trade-marks Act
Amax Potash Ltd v Saskatchewan [1977] 2 SCR 576October 5, 1976Ability of government to protect itself from unfavourable findings on federalism issues.
Miller v R [1977] 2 SCR 680Bill of Rights; Cruel and unusual punishment
R v Leary [1978] 1 SCR 29March 8, 1977intoxication defence
Kruger v R [1978] 1 SCR 104May 31, 1977Indian Act and provincial gaming laws
Smithers v R [1978] 1 SCR 506May 17, 1977criminal causation test
Capital Cities Communications Inc v Canadian Radio-Television Commission [1978] 2 SCR 141November 30, 1977federal works and undertakings
Quebec (AG) v Kellogg's Co of Canada [1978] 2 SCR 211January 19, 1978freedom of expression
Arnold v Teno [1978] 2 SCR 287January 19, 1978duty of care; unforeseeable plaintiff
Nova Scotia (Board of Censors) v McNeil [1978] 2 SCR 662January 19, 1978federalism; provincial power to censor
Canada (AG) v Montreal (City of) [1978] 2 SCR 770January 19, 1978Federalism and municipal power to create preventative by-laws
Reference Re Agricultural Products Marketing Act [1978] 2 SCR 1198
R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) [1978] 2 SCR 1299May 1, 1978 strict liability offences
Manitoba Fisheries Ltd v R [1979] 1 SCR 101October 3, 1978expropriation; regulatory taking
Bliss v Canada (AG) [1979] 1 SCR 183October 31, 1978Canadian Bill of Rights
R v Hauser [1979] 1 SCR 984May 1, 1979federalism; peace, order and good government
Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd [1979] 1 SCR 1067November 21, 1978defamation
Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 963 v New Brunswick Liquor Corp [1979] 2 SCR 227 judicial review
Dunlop v R [1979] 2 SCR 881May 31, 1979aiding and abetting
Lewis v R [1979] 2 SCR 821June 14, 1979Murder; motive
Quebec (AG) v Blaikie (No 1) [1979] 2 SCR 1016December 13, 1979language rights

1980 1984

Case nameCitationDateSubject
Solosky v R [1980] 1 SCR 821December 21, 1979solicitor-client privilege
Labatt Breweries of Canada Ltd v Canada (AG) [1980] 1 SCR 914federal legislative power
Pappajohn v R [1980] 2 SCR 120May 20, 1980rape defence
Pettkus v Becker [1980] 2 SCR 834December 18, 1980unjust enrichment
Reibl v Hughes [1980] 2 SCR 880October 7, 1980duty to disclose
R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd [1981] 1 SCR 111January 27, 1981 offer and acceptance
Re Residential Tenancies Act, 1979 [1981] 1 SCR 714May 28, 1981jurisdiction of courts
Seneca College v Bhadauria [1981] 2 S.C.R. 181June 22, 1981Human rights, tort, discrimination
Patriation Reference [1981] 1 SCR 753September 28, 1981patriation of the Constitution of Canada
Canada (Minister of Justice) v Borowski [1981] 2 SCR 575December 1, 1981public interest standing
Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Etobicoke (Borough of) [1982] 1 SCR 202February 9, 1982age discrimination
April 17, 1982 - The Constitution Act, 1982, which includes the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, enters into effect
Vetrovec v R [1982] 1 SCR 811May 31, 1982evidence
Descôteaux v Mierzwinski [1982] 1 SCR 860June 23, 1982privilege
Multiple Access Ltd v McCutcheon [1982] 2 SCR 161August 9, 1982overlapping federal and provincial laws
Shell Oil Co v Canada (Commissioner of Patents) [1982] 2 SCR 536November 2, 1982patents
Quebec Veto Reference [1982] 2 SCR 793December 6, 1982Quebec veto
Graat v R [1982] 2 SCR 819December 21, 1982opinion evidence
Westendorp v R [1983] 1 SCR 43January 25, 1983division of powers
Canada (Labour Relations Board) v Paul L'Anglais Inc [1983] 1 SCR 147February 8, 1983jurisdiction of courts
R v Saskatchewan Wheat Pool [1983] 1 SCR 205February 8, 1983tort of breach of statutory duty
R v Perka [1984] 2 SCR 232October 11, 1984defence of necessity
Re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act [1984] 1 SCR 297May 3, 1984provincial legislative power
March 26, 1984 death of Chief Justice Bora Laskin

See also

Related Research Articles

Supreme Court of Canada Highest court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.

Chief Justice of Canada Presiding judge of the Supreme Court of Canada

The chief justice of Canada is the presiding judge of the nine-member Supreme Court of Canada, the highest judicial body in Canada. As such, the chief justice is the highest-ranking judge of the Canadian court system. The Supreme Court Act makes the chief justice, a Crown in Council appointment, meaning the Crown acting on the advice of the prime minister and minister of justice. The chief justice serves until they resign, turn 75 years old, die, or are removed from office for cause. By tradition, a new chief justice is chosen from among the court's incumbent puisne justices.

Bora Laskin 14th Chief Justice of Canada

Bora Laskin was a Canadian jurist who served as the 14th chief justice of Canada from 1973 to 1984. Laskin was appointed a puisne justice of the Supreme Court in 1970, and served on the Ontario Court of Appeal from 1965 to 1970. Before he was named to the bench, Laskin worked as a lawyer and in academia.

Lyman Duff 8th Chief Justice of Canada

Sir Lyman Poore Duff, was the eighth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He was the longest serving justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario is the appellate court for the province of Ontario, Canada. The seat of the court is Osgoode Hall in downtown Toronto, also the seat of the Law Society of Ontario and the Divisional Court of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Ronald Martland, was a Canadian lawyer and Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He was the second Albertan appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada, taking the place of Justice Nolan, who died after only a short time on the Court.

Wishart Spence

Wishart Flett Spence, was a puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.

Jean Beetz

Jean-Marie Philémon Joseph Beetz,, c.r. was a Canadian lawyer, academic and judge from Quebec. He served as a puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada from 1974 to 1988.

<i>Murdoch v Murdoch</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Murdoch v Murdoch, also known as the Murdoch Case, was a controversial family law decision by the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court denied an abused ranch wife any interest in the family ranch. This case is most notable for the public outcry it created at the time and for what many believe is Justice Laskin's most famous dissenting opinion.

<i>Canada (AG) v Lavell</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Canada (AG) v Lavell, [1974] S.C.R. 1349, was a landmark 5–4 Supreme Court of Canada decision holding that Section 12(1)(b) of the Indian Act did not violate the respondents' right to "equality before the law" under Section 1 (b) of the Canadian Bill of Rights. The two respondents, Lavell and Bédard, had alleged that the impugned section was discriminatory under the Canadian Bill of Rights by virtue of the fact that it deprived Indian women of their status for marrying a non-Indian, but not Indian men.

<i>Labatt Breweries of Canada Ltd v Canada (AG)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Labatt Breweries of Canada Ltd v Canada (AG), 1979 CanLII 190, [1980] 1 SCR 914 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the division of powers under the Constitution Act, 1867. The Court held that the part of the federal Food and Drugs Act which prohibited the selling of "light" beer without labelling it to indicate its composition and purity was outside of the authority of the federal government to legislate.

The Supreme Court of Canada was founded in 1875 and has served as the final court of appeal in Canada since 1949. Its history may be divided into three general eras. From its inception in 1875 until 1949, the Court served as an intermediate appellate court subject to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain. Following 1949, the Court gained importance and legitimacy as the court of last resort in Canada, establishing a greater role for the Canadian judiciary. In 1982, the introduction of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms significantly changed the role of the Court in Canadian society, by providing the Court with greater powers of oversight over Parliament and through formal recognition of civil rights including aboriginal rights and equality rights.

<i>Quebec (AG) v Kelloggs Co of Canada</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Quebec (AG) v Kellogg's Co of Canada is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the pre-Charter right to freedom of expression. The Quebec Consumer Protection Act, which prohibited advertising to children through cartoons, was challenged by the Kellogg Company on the basis that it affected TV stations across the country. The Court held that the regulation of advertising is a matter within the authority of the province, and that the Act was valid law under the Property and Civil Rights power allocated to the province under section 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

<i>Capital Cities Communications Inc v Canadian Radio-Television Commission</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Capital Cities Communications v. CRTC (1977), [1978] 2 S.C.R. 141 is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on the legislative jurisdiction of cable television. Chief Justice Laskin, writing for the majority of the Court, held that all television, even where exclusively produced and distributed within the province, fell within the definition of a federal undertaking under section 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

MacDonald v Vapor Canada Ltd, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 134 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the Trade and Commerce power under section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada have the option of releasing reasons for a unanimous decision anonymously by simply attributing the judgment to "The Court". The practice began around 1979 by Chief Justice Laskin, borrowing from the US Supreme Court practice of anonymizing certain unanimous decisions. Unlike in the US, which uses it primarily for uncontroversial cases, in Canada, it is used almost always for important and controversial cases.

<i>Interprovincial Cooperatives Ltd v R</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Interprovincial Cooperatives Ltd v R (1975), [1976] 1 SCR 477 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutional limits of provincial powers.

John B. Laskin is a justice of the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada.