3D printing processes

Last updated
Computer-aided design (CAD) model used for 3D printing. The manual modeling process of preparing geometric data for 3D computer graphics is similar to plastic arts such as sculpting. 3D scanning is a process of collecting digital data on the shape and appearance of a real object, creating a digital model based on it. 84530877 FillingSys (9415669149).jpg
Computer-aided design (CAD) model used for 3D printing. The manual modeling process of preparing geometric data for 3D computer graphics is similar to plastic arts such as sculpting. 3D scanning is a process of collecting digital data on the shape and appearance of a real object, creating a digital model based on it.

A variety of processes, equipment, and materials are used in the production of a three-dimensional object via additive manufacturing.

Contents

Techniques include jetting, extrusion, additive friction stir deposition, powder bed fusion, binder jetting, stereolithography, computed axial lithography, liquid alternative, lamination, directed energy deposition, selective powder deposition, and cryogenic manufacturing.

Types

3D printing processes, are grouped into seven categories by ASTM International in the ISO/ASTM52900-15: [1]

Each process and piece of equipment has advantages and disadvantages associated with it. These usually involve aspects such as speed, costs, versatility with respect to feedstock, geometrical limitations and tolerances, as well as a mechanical and appearance properties of the products such as strength, texture, and color.

The variety of processes and equipment allows for numerous uses by amateurs and professionals alike. Some lend themselves better toward industry use (in this case the term additive manufacturing is preferred) whereas others make 3D printing accessible to the average consumer. Some printers are large enough to fabricate buildings whilst others tend to micro and nanoscale sized objects and in general many different technologies can be exploited to physically produce the designed objects. [2]

History

Evolution of 3D printing over the decades. Evolution of 3D Printing Technologies.webp
Evolution of 3D printing over the decades.

Inkjet printing was pioneered by Teletype which introduced the electrostatic pull Inktronic [4] teleprinter in 1966. The printer had 40 jets that offered a break-through speed of 120 characters per second. [5]

Continuous inkjets were popular in the 1950–1960's before Drop-On-Demand [6] inkjets were invented in 1972. [7] Continuous three-dimensional inks were wax based and low temperature metal alloys. Printing with these hot-melt inks produced alpha-numeric characters that were solid and raised, but no one recognized them as 3D printing. In 1971, a young engineer, Johannes Gottwald patented a liquid metal recorder that printed large characters in metal for signage, but Teletype Corp ignored the discovery. Braille was printed with wax inks but never commercialized in the 1960s.

R.H. Research [8] researched printing from 1982 -1983 and decided that single-nozzle inkjet was a possible fit. He recruited engineers Al Hock, Tom Peer, Dave Lutz, Jim and Kathy McMahon to join the company, which became Howtek, Inc. The company's Pixelmaster device used Tefzel nozzles, which allowed the inkjet to work at high temperature and support thermoplastic hot-melt inks. The device could handle a frequency range of 1–16,000 drops per second. It featured 32 inkjet single nozzles per printhead, printing 4 colors (8 jets per color) CMYK. The printhead rotated at 121 rpm and placed uniform drops precisely as subtractive printing. This technology of hot-melt inks printing layers of CMYK was a precursor to a 3D patent by Richard Helinski.

Chuck Hull patented stereolithography (SLA) in 1986. [9]

In 1993, Helinski's patent was licensed first by Sanders Prototype, Inc.,(later Solidscape, Inc) manufacturer of the first desktop rapid prototype printer, the Modelmaker 6 Pro. It used Howtek style inkjets and thermoplastic inks. Models printed with thermoplastic were perfect for investment casting with no ash during burnout. Thermoplastic ink drop printing is accurate and precise enough for jewelers and detail sensitive CAD designers. The Howtek inkjets that were designed to print a page in 4 minutes were employed to print for as long as 4 days straight.

Processes

Several 3D printing processes have been invented since the late 1970s. [3] The printers were originally large, expensive, and highly limited in what they could produce. [10]

A large number of additive processes are now available. The main differences between processes are in the way layers are deposited to create parts and in the materials that are used. Some methods melt or soften the material to produce the layers, for example. selective laser melting (SLM) or direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), selective laser sintering (SLS), fused deposition modeling (FDM), [11] [12] [13] or fused filament fabrication (FFF), while others cure liquid materials using different sophisticated technologies, such as stereolithography (SLA). With laminated object manufacturing (LOM), thin layers are cut to shape and joined (e.g., paper, polymer, metal). Particle deposition using inkjet technology prints layers of material in the form of individual drops. Each drop of solid ink from hot-melt material actually prints one particle or one object. Color hot-melt inks print individual drops of CMYK on top of each other to produce a single color object with 1–3 layers melted together. Complex 3D models are printed with many overlapping drops fused together into layers as defined by the sliced CAD file. Inkjet technology allows 3D models to be solid or open cell structures as defined by the 3D printer inkjet print configuration. Each method has its own advantages and drawbacks, which is why some companies offer a choice of powder and polymer for the material used to build the object. [14] Others sometimes use standard, off-the-shelf business paper as the build material to produce a durable prototype. The main considerations in choosing a machine are generally speed, costs of the 3D printer, of the printed prototype, choice and cost of the materials, and color capabilities. [15]

Printers that work directly with metals are generally expensive. However less expensive printers can be used to make a mold, which is then used to make metal parts. [16]

TypeTechnologiesMaterials
Material jettingDrop-on-demand or continuous (single- or multi-nozzle) particle depositionHot-melt materials (wax, thermoplastic, metal alloy), dispersed materials (technical ceramics, metals, polymers)
Material extrusion Fused deposition modeling (FDM) or fused filament fabrication (FFF) and fused pellet fabrication or fused particle fabrication Thermoplastics, eutectic metals, edible materials, rubbers, modeling clay, plasticine
Robocasting or MIG welding 3D printing [17] or direct ink writing (DIW) or extrusion based additive manufacturing of metals (EAM) and ceramics (EAC)Metal-binder mixtures such as metal clay, ceramic-binder mixtures (including ceramic clay and ceramic slurries), cermet, metal matrix composite, ceramic matrix composite, metal (MIG welding) [17]
Additive friction stir deposition (AFSD)Metal alloys
Composite filament fabrication (CFF)Nylon or nylon reinforced with carbon, Kevlar or glass fibers
Light polymerized Stereolithography (SLA) Photopolymer (including preceramic polymers)
Digital light processing (DLP)Photopolymer
Continuous liquid interface production (CLIP)Photopolymer + thermally activated chemistry
Dynamic Interface Printing (DIP)Photopolymer
Powder bed Powder bed and inkjet head 3D printing (3DP)Almost any metal alloy, powdered polymers, Plaster
Electron-beam melting (EBM)Almost any metal alloy including titanium alloys
Selective laser melting (SLM) Titanium alloys, cobalt-chrome alloys, stainless steel, aluminium
Selective heat sintering (SHS) [18] Thermoplastic powder
Selective laser sintering (SLS) Thermoplastics, metal powders, ceramic powders
Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)Metal alloys
Laminated Laminated object manufacturing (LOM)Paper, metal foil, plastic film
Powder fed Laser metal deposition (LMD) or Directed Energy Deposition (DED)Metal alloys
Extreme high-speed laser cladding (EHLA) [19] Metal alloys
Wire Electron beam freeform fabrication (EBF3)Metal alloys
Wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM)Metal alloys

Jetting

Material jetting

In material jetting a nozzle is drawn across an absorbent surface. The material is either wick ed, electrostatically pulled from a larger jet, [4] pressurized to expel material either continuously, or in short bursts as spray or drops.

Nozzles can be single nozzle with one fluid chamber or multi-nozzle with single or multi-fluid chambers, or combinations of these.

The material needs to have low enough viscosity to pass through the nozzle opening. Hot-melt materials can be melted to become liquid. The inks must be thick enough to accumulate vertically.

Continuous inkjet technology (CIT) began by printing signs and documents on paper, later adapted to print metals. Wax and thermoplastics were the first 3D materials, printed by drop-on-demand (DOD) inkjets.

Binder jetting

Schematic of binder jetting. Moving head selectively deposits binder onto powder bed. Platform lowers progressively. Solidified object rests in unbound powder. New powder adds from reservoir via leveling mechanism. Schematic representation of granular binding fabrication.png
Schematic of binder jetting. Moving head selectively deposits binder onto powder bed. Platform lowers progressively. Solidified object rests in unbound powder. New powder adds from reservoir via leveling mechanism.

Binder jetting deposits binding adhesive onto layers of powdered material. [20] Also known as inkjet 3D printing, the process spreads powder (ceramic, metal, or plastic-based, including plaster and resins) across a platform. A print head deposits binder in the cross-section of each layer. Modern printers cure (solidify) the binder at each layer. The resulting part is further cured in an oven to remove most binder. Operators sinter it in a kiln following a material-specific time-temperature curve. Unbound powder supports overhangs during printing. The method enables full-color prototypes and elastomer parts. Strength improves by impregnating voids with wax, thermoset polymer, bronze, or other compatible materials. [21] [22]

Extrusion

Schematic of fused filament fabrication. Filament a) feeds through heated moving head b). Head melts and extrudes material, depositing it layer by layer to form shape c). Moving platform e) lowers after each layer. Support structures d) sustain overhangs. Schematic representation of Fused Filament Fabrication 01.png
Schematic of fused filament fabrication. Filament a) feeds through heated moving head b). Head melts and extrudes material, depositing it layer by layer to form shape c). Moving platform e) lowers after each layer. Support structures d) sustain overhangs.

Fused filament fabrication (FFF), trademarked as fused deposition modeling (FDM), extrudes thermoplastic material to build objects layer by layer. As of 2023, FDM was the dominant 3D printing method. [23]

A filament of thermoplastic feeds into an extrusion nozzle. The nozzle head heats the material to its melting point and extrudes it onto a build platform. Stepper or servomotors move the head and control flow along three axes. Computer-aided manufacturing software generates G-code. A microcontroller drives the motors.

Common materials include acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polycarbonate (PC), polylactic acid (PLA), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), PC/ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), and high impact polystyrene (HIPS). The filament forms from virgin resins.

A timelapse video of a robot model (logo of Make magazine) being printed using FDM on a RepRapPro Fisher printer.
3D glass printer, depositing molten glass

Open-source projects recycle post-consumer plastic waste into filament using shredders and extruders like recyclebots. [24] [25] [26] [27] PTFE tubing transfers filament due to high-temperature resistance. [28] Variants use pellets or particles instead of filament, known as fused pellet/particle/granular fabrication (FPF/FGF), aiding the use of recycled materials. [29] [30] Metal wire enables printing via wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), reducing costs. Molten glass deposition creates artistic works. Use of FDM limits complex geometries such as overhangs or stalactite structures. Slicer software adds removable support structures for such features. [31]

S. Scott Crump developed the process in the late 1980s. Stratasys commercialized it in 1990. [32] It evolved from automated polymeric foil hot air welding, hot-melt gluing, and gasket deposition. After patent expiration, open-source RepRap projects fostered community development and DIY variants. Prices fell by two orders of magnitude. [33]

Additive friction-stir deposition

Additive friction stir deposition (AFSD) is a solid-state metal additive manufacturing process that uses a rotating tool to deposit feedstock material onto a substrate. [34] AFSD offers a number of advantages over other metal additive manufacturing processes, including high material utilization, low energy consumption, and the ability to print metal alloys incompatible with melt-based processes. [35]

Powder bed fusion

Schematic of granular binding. Moving head a) selectively binds powder bed e) surface by dropping glue or laser sintering. Platform f) lowers progressively. Solidified object d) rests in unbound powder. Leveling mechanism b) adds new powder from reservoir c). Schematic representation of granular binding fabrication.png
Schematic of granular binding. Moving head a) selectively binds powder bed e) surface by dropping glue or laser sintering. Platform f) lowers progressively. Solidified object d) rests in unbound powder. Leveling mechanism b) adds new powder from reservoir c).

Powder bed fusion (PBF) selectively fuses material in a granular bed. [36] The process fuses layer parts, raises the working area, adds granules, and repeats until completion. Unfused powder supports overhangs and thin walls, reducing auxiliary supports. PBF includes direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), selective laser sintering (SLS), selective laser melting (SLM), multi-jet fusion (MJF), and electron beam melting (EBM). [37] These methods handle diverse materials and enable complex geometries.

Selective laser sintering

Selective laser sintering (SLS) uses polymers and metals (e.g., PA, PA-GF, PEEK, alumide, carbonmide, elastomers) and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). [38] [39] Deckard and Joseph Beaman developed and patented it in the mid-1980s under DARPA sponsorship. [40] [41] R. F. Housholder patented a similar, uncommercialized process in 1979. [42]

Selective laser melting

Selective laser melting (SLM) does not use sintering for the fusion of powder granules but melts the powder using a high-energy laser to create fully dense materials in a layer-wise method that has mechanical properties similar to those of conventional manufactured metals. [36] [43]

Electron beam melting

Electron beam melting (EBM) melts metal powder (e.g., titanium alloys) layer by layer with an electron beam in high vacuum, producing void-free parts. [44] [45]

Multi-jet fusion

Multi-jet fusion (MJF) combines fusing and detailing agents with an inkjet array that it heats to solidify layers without lasers. [46] Binder jetting spreads powder (plaster or resins) and prints binder via inkjet. Selective heat sintering applies heat with a thermal printhead to thermoplastic powder, offering a cheaper, scalable alternative. [47]

Schematic representation of granular binding: a moving head a) selectively binds (by dropping glue or by laser sintering) the surface of a powder bed e); a moving platform f) progressively lowers the bed and the solidified object d) rests inside the unbinded powder. New powder is continuously added to the bed from a powder reservoir c) by means of a leveling mechanism b) Schematic representation of granular binding fabrication.png
Schematic representation of granular binding: a moving head a) selectively binds (by dropping glue or by laser sintering) the surface of a powder bed e); a moving platform f) progressively lowers the bed and the solidified object d) rests inside the unbinded powder. New powder is continuously added to the bed from a powder reservoir c) by means of a leveling mechanism b)

Another 3D printing approach is the selective fusing of materials in a granular bed. [36] The technique fuses parts of the layer and then moves up, adding layers of granules and repeating the process until the piece is complete. This process uses the unfused media to support overhangs and thin walls, which reduces the need for auxiliary supports. For example, in selective heat sintering, a thermal printhead applies heat to layers of powdered thermoplastic; when a layer is finished, the powder bed moves down, and an automated roller adds a new layer of material to sinter into the next cross-section; using a less intense thermal printhead instead of a laser, a cheaper solution than lasers, and can be scaled down to desktop sizes. [48]

Electron beam melting (EBM) is a similar type of additive manufacturing technology for metal parts (e.g. titanium alloys). EBM manufactures parts by melting metal powder layer by layer with an electron beam in a high vacuum. Unlike metal sintering techniques that operate below melting point, EBM parts are void-free. [44] [45]

Stereolithography

Schematic of stereolithography. Light-emitting device a) (laser or DLP) selectively illuminates transparent bottom c) of tank b) filled with liquid photopolymer resin. Solidified resin d) drags up progressively by lifting platform e). Schematic representation of Stereolithography.png
Schematic of stereolithography. Light-emitting device a) (laser or DLP) selectively illuminates transparent bottom c) of tank b) filled with liquid photopolymer resin. Solidified resin d) drags up progressively by lifting platform e).

Vat photopolymerization cures liquid photopolymer resin layer by layer using light sources such as lasers, digital light projectors (DLP), or LEDs. The process exposes resin in a vat to controlled light under safelight conditions. Photopolymerization cross-links monomers, typically via carbon-carbon double bonds in acrylates, when exposed to chromophores or photosensitive additives. [49] [50] The build platform moves incrementally. Excess liquid resin drains after completion. Objet PolyJet systems spray photopolymer in ultra-thin layers (16–30 μm). UV light cures each layer immediately, enabling instant handling without a later curing step. Gel-like supports are removed by hand or water jetting.

The method suits elastomers and ophthalmic lenses. [51] [52]

Multiphoton polymerization uses focused lasers to cure gel only at focal points due to nonlinear photoexcitation. Excess gel washes away. This enables features under 100 nm and complex moving structures. [53]

Mask-image-projection stereolithography slices models into planes, converts slices to masks, and projects them onto resin to cure layers. Some systems support multiple materials.

Continuous liquid interface production (CLIP) uses an oxygen-permeable window below the resin pool to create a persistent liquid "dead zone." This enables continuous extraction of the object, reducing times from hours to minutes. [54] [55] [56]

Dynamic Interface Printing (DIP) submerges a hollow print head with a transparent window into prepolymer. Visible light cures at the air-liquid meniscus. Air pressure and acoustic modulation control the interface for precision and material flow.

Preceramic polymers enable ceramic printing (e.g., silicon carbide) via photopolymerization. [49] Some systems solidify synthetic resin with LEDs. [57]

Powder-fed directed-energy deposition melts supplied metal powder with a laser, a localized analog of selective laser sintering. [58] [59]

Computed axial lithography

Computed axial lithography reverses the principle of computed tomography (CT) to create prints in photo-curable resin. It was developed by a collaboration between the University of California, Berkeley with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. [60] [61] [62] It creates objects using a series of 2D images projected onto a cylinder of resin. [60] [61] [62] It is notable for its ability to build objects more quickly than other resin methods and can embed objects within the prints. [60]

Liquid additive manufacturing

Liquid additive manufacturing (LAM) is an additive manufacturing technique which deposits a liquid or highly viscous material (e.g. Liquid Silicone Rubber) onto a build surface to create an object, which is then vulcanised using heat to harden it. [63] [64] [65] The process was created by Adrian Bowyer and extended by German company RepRap. [63] [66] [67]

Programmable tooling involves creating a temporary mold, which is then filled via a conventional injection molding process and then immediately dissolved. [68]

Lamination

In some printers, paper can be used as the build material, lowering costs. These printers that cut cross-sections out of special adhesive coated paper using a carbon dioxide laser and laminates them.

Alternatively, ordinary sheets of office paper can be cut by a tungsten carbide blade, followed by selective deposition of adhesive and pressure to bond layers. [69]

Other printers print laminated objects using plastic and metal sheets.

Ultrasonic consolidation (UC) or ultrasonic additive manufacturing (UAM) is a low temperature additive technique for metals.

Directed energy deposition (DED)

Powder-fed directed-energy deposition

A high-power laser melts metal powder supplied to the focus of the laser beam. The laser beam typically travels through the center of the deposition head and is lens-focused to a small spot. The build occurs on an X-Y table which is driven by a tool path created from a digital model. The deposition head is moved vertically as each layer is completed.

Some systems make use of 5-axis [70] [71] or 6-axis systems [72] (i.e. articulated arms) capable of delivering material on the substrate (a printing bed, or a pre-existing part) [73] with few to no spatial access restrictions. Metal powder is delivered and distributed around the head or can be split by an internal manifold and delivered through nozzles arranged around the deposition head. A hermetically sealed chamber filled with inert gas or a local inert shroud gas (sometimes combined) are often used to shield the melt pool from atmospheric oxygen, to limit oxidation and better control material properties.

The powder-fed directed-energy process is similar to selective laser sintering, but the metal powder is projected only where material is to be added to the part at that moment. The laser heats and creates a "melt pool" on the substrate, in which the new powder is injected quasi-simultaneously.

The process supports materials including titanium, stainless steel, aluminum, tungsten, and other specialty materials as well as composites and functionally graded material. The process can build new metal parts, but can also add material to existing parts, supporting coatings, repair, and hybrid manufacturing applications. LENS (Laser Engineered Net Shaping), is one example. [74] [75]

Metal wire processes

Laser-based wire-feed systems, such as laser metal deposition-wire (LMD-w), feed wire through a nozzle that is melted by a laser using inert gas shielding in either an open environment (gas surrounding the laser), or in a sealed chamber. Electron beam freeform fabrication uses an electron beam heat source inside a vacuum chamber.

It is also possible to use conventional gas metal arc welding attached to a 3D stage to 3-D print metals such as steel, bronze and aluminum. [76] [77] Low-cost open source RepRap-style 3-D printers have been outfitted with Arduino-based sensors and demonstrated reasonable metallurgical properties from conventional welding wire as feedstock. [78]

Selective powder deposition

In selective powder deposition (SPD), build and support powders are selectively deposited into a crucible, such that the build powder takes the shape of the desired object and support powder fills the rest of the crucible. Then an infill material is applied, such that it comes in contact with the build powder. Then the crucible is fired in a kiln between the melting point of the infill and the powders. When the infill melts, it soaks the build powder. But it doesn't soak the support powder, because the support powder is chosen to not be wettable by the infill. If at the firing temperature, the atoms of the infill material and the build powder are mutually defusable, such as with copper powder and zinc infill, then the resulting material is a uniform mixture of those atoms, in this case, bronze. But if the atoms are not mutually defusable, such as tungsten and copper at 1100°C, then the resulting material is a composite. To prevent shape distortion, the firing temperature must be below the solidus temperature of the resulting alloy. [79]

Cryogenic

Cryogenic 3D printing is a collection of techniques that forms solid structures by freezing liquid materials as they are deposited. As each liquid layer is applied, it is cooled by the low temperature of the previous layer and printing environment which solidifies it. Cryogenic techniques requires a controlled printing environment. The ambient temperature must be below the material's freezing point to ensure the structure remains solid during manufacturing and the humidity must remain low to prevent frost formation between layers. [80] Materials typically include water and water-based solutions, such as brine, slurry, and hydrogels. [81] [82] Cryogenic techniques include rapid freezing prototype (RFP), [81] low-temperature deposition manufacturing (LDM), [83] and freeze-form extrusion fabrication (FEF). [84]

Printers

Industry

As of October 2012, additive manufacturing systems ranged from $2,000 to $500,000 in price and were employed in industries including aerospace, architecture, automotive, defense, and medical replacements. These devices are used for prototyping, jig making, fixturing, fixing small custom components, and complete products. [85]

Higher end 3-D printers have now become relatively common for production and additive manufacturing. [85] For example, General Electric uses additive manufacturing to build turbine parts. Rapid prototyping saves time and reduces complexity. Volkswagen uses 3D printers to print tooling, jigs and fixtures. As of 2018 they estimated that 3D printers save 250,000 per year in costs. [86] One 2018 report estimated that almost 75% of desktop 3D printers made are used in industry. [87]

Military and defense systems also incorporating the use of 3D printers. The Royal Netherlands Air Force is using desktop 3D printers to make fixtures and alignment tools. [88] Hill Air Force Base uses 3D printed parts to replace jet parts. [89]

Higher education is a major buyer of desktop and professional 3D printers. [90] In higher education, 3D printing is used to fabricate equipment. For example, chemists can 3D print flow reactor systems that would otherwise exceed typical budgets, [91] such as a device created at the UCL School of Pharmacy in the UK. [92] Many libraries house smaller 3D printers for educational and community access. [93]

Consumer

RepRap version 2.0 (Mendel) RepRap 'Mendel'.jpg
RepRap version 2.0 (Mendel)
All of the plastic parts for the machine on the right were produced by the machine on the left. Adrian Bowyer (left) and Vik Olliver (right) are members of the RepRap project. First replication.jpg
All of the plastic parts for the machine on the right were produced by the machine on the left. Adrian Bowyer (left) and Vik Olliver (right) are members of the RepRap project.

DIY/Maker/enthusiast/early adopter communities, with ties to the academic and hacker communities, led consumer-level adoption.

RepRap Project is one of the longest running desktop projects. It aims to produce a free and open source hardware (FOSH) 3D printer, under the GNU General Public License that is capable of replicating itself by printing many of its own parts. RepRaps can print circuit boards and metal parts. As of 2016, the most popular 3D printer was the Prusa i3, a RepRap printer. [94] [95]

Many related projects have used RepRap for inspiration, creating an ecosystem of related or derivative 3D printers, most of which are also open-source. Development of open source 3D printers enables greater customization and the use of public domain designs to fabricate open source appropriate technology.

The cost of 3D printers decreased dramatically after about 2010, with machines that used to cost $20,000 falling below $1,000. The open source Fab@Home project has developed printers for general use with anything that can be squirted through a nozzle, from chocolate to silicone sealant and chemical reactants.

In addition, several RecycleBots such as the commercialized Filastruder have been designed and fabricated to convert waste plastic, such as shampoo containers and milk jugs, into inexpensive RepRap filament.

Large 3D printers

Larger 3D printers have been developed for industrial, education, and demonstrative uses. [96]

The BigRep One.1 with its 1 m volume. BigRep-One.jpg
The BigRep One.1 with its 1 m volume.

Another type of large printer is big area additive manufacturing (BAAM). The goal is to develop printers that can produce a large object in high speed. Another BAAM machine developed by Lockheed Martin aims to print objects up to 100 feet (30 m) long to be used in aerospace industries. [97]

Microscale and nanoscale printers

Microelectronic device fabrication methods can be employed to print nanoscale objects. Such printed objects are typically grown on a substrate, e.g., a silicon wafer, to which they adhere after printing as they are too small and fragile to be manipulated post-deposition.

In one technique, 3D nanostructures are printed by moving a dynamic stencil mask during the deposition process, somewhat analogous to the extrusion method of traditional 3D printers. Programmable-height nanostructures with resolutions as small as 10 nm have been produced in this fashion, by metallic physical vapor deposition using a mechanical piezo-actuator controlled stencil mask having a milled nanopore in a silicon nitride membrane. [98]

Another method enhances the photopolymerization process on a much smaller scale, using finely-focused lasers controlled by adjustable mirrors. This method produced objects with feature resolutions of 100 nm as of 2013. [99] Onr micron -wide, millimetre-long copper wires have been printed using lasers. [100]

See also

References

  1. "Additive manufacturing — General Principles — Overview of process categories and feedstock". ISO/ASTM International Standard. 17296-2:2015(E). 2015.
  2. Bickel, B.; Cignoni, P.; Malomo, L.; Pietroni, N. (2018). "State of the Art on Stylized Fabrication" (PDF). Computer Graphics Forum. 37 (6): 325–342. doi:10.1111/cgf.13327. hdl: 10453/129681 . S2CID   51870522.
  3. 1 2 Sames, W. (2016). "The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing" . International Materials Reviews. 61 (5): 315–360. Bibcode:2016IMRv...61..315S. doi:10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649. OSTI   1267051. S2CID   39704506.
  4. 1 2 Webster, Edward (2000). Print unchained: fifty years of digital printing, 1950-2000 and beyond: a saga of invention and enterprise. West Dover, VT: DRA of Vermont, Inc. p. 116. ISBN   0-9702617-0-5. OCLC   46611664.
  5. Barnatt, Christopher (2013). 3D printing: the next industrial revolution. [Nottingham, England?]: ExplainingTheFuture.com. ISBN   978-1-4841-8176-8. OCLC   854672031.
  6. Kenyon, R.W. (1996). "Thermal printing". Chemistry and Technology of Printing and Imaging Systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 115–118. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0601-6_6. ISBN   978-94-010-4265-9.
  7. Gregory, P., ed. (1996). Chemistry and technology of printing and imaging systems. London: Blackie Academic & Professional. ISBN   978-94-011-0601-6. OCLC   669699931.
  8. Howard, Robert (2009). Connecting the dots: my life and inventions, from X-rays to death rays. New York: Welcome Rain. ISBN   978-1-56649-957-6. OCLC   455879561.
  9. U.S. patent 4,575,330
  10. Jane Bird (2012-08-08). "Exploring the 3D printing opportunity". The Financial Times . Retrieved 2012-08-30.
  11. Ibrahim, Yazan; Hilal, Nidal (2023). "The potentials of 3D-printed feed spacers in reducing the environmental footprint of membrane separation processes" . Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 11 109249. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.109249. S2CID   255328712.
  12. Hamzah, Hairul Hisham; Shafiee, Saiful Arifin; Abdalla, Aya; Patel, Bhavik Anil (2018). "3D printable conductive materials for the fabrication of electrochemical sensors: A mini review". Electrochemistry Communications. 96: 27–31. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2018.09.006. S2CID   105586826.
  13. FDM is a proprietary term owned by Stratasys. All 3-D printers that are not Stratasys machines and use a fused filament process are referred to as or fused filament fabrication (FFF).
  14. Manolis Sherman, Lilli (November 15, 2007). "A whole new dimension – Rich homes can afford 3D printers". The Economist.
  15. Wohlers, Terry. "Factors to Consider When Choosing a 3D Printer (WohlersAssociates.com, Nov/Dec 2005)". Archived from the original on 2020-11-04. Retrieved 2017-02-24.
  16. "Casting aluminum parts directly from 3D printed PLA parts". 3ders.org. 2012-09-25. Retrieved 2013-10-30.
  17. 1 2 "Researchers Develop a Low-Cost Metal 3D Printer Using MIG Welding". October 8, 2018.
  18. "Affordable 3D Printing with new Selective Heat Sintering (SHS) technology". blueprinter. Archived from the original on 2014-08-09. Retrieved 2017-02-24.
  19. Schopphoven, Thomas; Gasser, Andres; Backes, Gerhard (2017). "EHLA: Extreme High-Speed Laser Material Deposition". Laser Technik Journal. 14 (4): 26–29. doi: 10.1002/latj.201700020 .
  20. "3DEXPERIENCE Platform". make.3dexperience.3ds.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2023. Retrieved 3 April 2023.
  21. Doyle, Michael; Agarwal, Kuldeep; Sealy, Winston; Schull, Kevin (2015). "Effect of Layer Thickness and Orientation on Mechanical Behavior of Binder Jet Stainless Steel 420 + Bronze Parts". Elsevier Procedia Manufacturing. 1: 251–262. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.016 . ISSN   2351-9789. S2CID   138624845.
  22. "Make - Dassault Systèmes®". Make - Dassault Systèmes®.
  23. Palermo, Elizabeth (19 September 2013). "Fused Deposition Modeling: Most Common 3D Printing Method". Livescience. Retrieved February 9, 2017.
  24. Mohammed, M., Mohan, M., Das, A., Johnson, M.D., Badwal, P.S., McLean, D. and Gibson, I., 2017, January. A low carbon footprint approach to the reconstitution of plastics into 3D-printer filament for enhanced waste reduction. In DesTech 2016: Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Technology (pp. 234-241). Knowledge E.
  25. Baechler, C., DeVuono, M. and Pearce, J.M., 2013. Distributed recycling of waste polymer into RepRap feedstock. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 19(2), pp.118-125.
  26. Zhong, S. and Pearce, J.M., 2018. Tightening the loop on the circular economy: Coupled distributed recycling and manufacturing with recyclebot and RepRap 3-D printing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, pp.48-58.
  27. Despeisse, M., Baumers, M., Brown, P., Charnley, F., Ford, S.J., Garmulewicz, A., Knowles, S., Minshall, T.H.W., Mortara, L., Reed-Tsochas, F.P. and Rowley, J., 2017. Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, pp.75-84.
  28. "PTFE Tubing Benefits & Applications". Fluorotherm Polymers, Inc. 2015-11-17. Retrieved 17 November 2015.
  29. Optimizing the Properties of Recycled 3D Printing Materials https://3dprint.com/223571/optimizing-recycled-materials/
  30. Woern, Aubrey; Byard, Dennis; Oakley, Robert; Fiedler, Matthew; Snabes, Samantha; Pearce, Joshua (2018). "Fused Particle Fabrication 3-D Printing: Recycled Materials' Optimization and Mechanical Properties". Materials. 11 (8): 1413. Bibcode:2018Mate...11.1413W. doi: 10.3390/ma11081413 . PMC   6120030 . PMID   30103532.
  31. "How Selective Heat Sintering Works". THRE3D.com. Archived from the original on 3 February 2014. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
  32. Chee Kai Chua; Kah Fai Leong; Chu Sing Lim (2003). Rapid Prototyping. World Scientific. p. 124. ISBN   978-981-238-117-0.
  33. Palermo, Elizabeth (19 September 2013). "Fused Deposition Modeling: Most Common 3D Printing Method". Livescience. Retrieved February 9, 2017.
  34. "Non-beam-based metal additive manufacturing enabled by additive friction stir deposition". researchgate.net. April 2018. Retrieved August 20, 2024.
  35. Anderson-Wedge, K.; Avery, D.Z.; Daniewicz, S.R.; Sowards, J.W.; Allison, P.G.; Jordon, J.B.; Amaro, R.L. (2021). "Characterization of the fatigue behavior of additive friction stir-deposition AA2219". International Journal of Fatigue. 142 105951. Bibcode:2021IJFa..14205951A. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105951 . S2CID   225011973.
  36. 1 2 3 Ibrahim, Yazan; Hilal, Nidal (2023). "The potentials of 3D-printed feed spacers in reducing the environmental footprint of membrane separation processes" . Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 11 109249. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.109249. S2CID   255328712.
  37. "Powder bed fusion - DMLS, SLS, SLM, MJF, EBM". make.3dexperience.3ds.com. Archived from the original on 10 April 2019. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  38. "Aluminum-powder DMLS-printed part finishes race first". 2014-03-03.
  39. "Selective Laser Sintering, Birth of an Industry - Department of Mechanical Engineering". me.utexas.edu.
  40. "Selective Laser Sintering, Birth of an Industry - Department of Mechanical Engineering". me.utexas.edu.
  41. Deckard, C., "Method and apparatus for producing parts by selective sintering", U.S. patent 4,863,538 , filed October 17, 1986, published September 5, 1989.
  42. States4247508 United States 4247508,R. Houshoulder,"Molding Process",published 27 January 1981
  43. Smith, T. M.; Thompson, A. C.; Gabb, T. P.; Bowman, C. L.; Kantzos, C. A. (2020-06-15). "Efficient production of a high-performance dispersion strengthened, multi-principal element alloy". Scientific Reports. 10 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 9663. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.9663S. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66436-5 . PMC   7296023 . PMID   32541782.
  44. 1 2 Hiemenz, Joe (9 March 2007). "Rapid prototypes move to metal components (EE Times, 3/9/2007)". Archived from the original on 2012-11-02. Retrieved 2024-10-17.
  45. 1 2 "Rapid Manufacturing by Electron Beam Melting". SMU.edu. Archived from the original on September 26, 2015.
  46. "Material extrusion - FDM". make.3dexperience.3ds.com. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
  47. "How Selective Heat Sintering Works". THRE3D.com. Archived from the original on 3 February 2014. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
  48. "How Selective Heat Sintering Works". THRE3D.com. Archived from the original on 3 February 2014. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
  49. 1 2 Wang, Xifan; Schmidt, Franziska; Hanaor, Dorian; Kamm, Paul H.; Li, Shuang; Gurlo, Aleksander (2019). "Additive manufacturing of ceramics from preceramic polymers: A versatile stereolithographic approach assisted by thiol-ene click chemistry". Additive Manufacturing. 27: 80–90. arXiv: 1905.02060 . doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.012. hdl:1959.4/unsworks_60402. S2CID   104470679.
  50. Jacobs, Paul Francis (1992-01-01). Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing: Fundamentals of Stereolithography. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. ISBN   978-0-87263-425-1.
  51. Cameron Coward (7 April 2015). 3D Printing. DK Publishing. p. 74. ISBN   978-1-61564-745-3.
  52. Butler Millsaps, Bridget (6 March 2015). "Comparing LUXeXceL's Printoptical Technology to Transparent Polyjet, SLA & MJM 3D Printing". 3DPRINT.com. Retrieved 15 February 2018.
  53. Johnson, R. Colin (30 March 2007). "Cheaper avenue to 65 nm? (EE Times, 3/30/2007)".
  54. St. Fleur, Nicholas (17 March 2015). "3-D Printing Just Got 100 Times Faster". The Atlantic . Archived from the original on 19 March 2015. Retrieved 19 March 2015.
  55. St. Fleur, Nicholas (17 March 2015). "3-D Printing Just Got 100 Times Faster". The Atlantic . Retrieved 19 March 2015.
  56. Castelvecchi, Davide (17 March 2015). "Chemical trick speeds up 3D printing". Nature . Retrieved 19 March 2015.
  57. "The World's Smallest 3D Printer". TU Wien. 12 September 2011. Archived from the original on 20 September 2011. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  58. Beese, Allison M.; Carroll, Beth E. (2015). "Review of Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Made by Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Powder Feedstock". JOM. 68 (3): 724. Bibcode:2016JOM....68c.724B. doi:10.1007/s11837-015-1759-z. S2CID   138250882.
  59. Gibson, Ian; Rosen, David; Stucker, Brent (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies (PDF). doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3. ISBN   978-1-4939-2112-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 August 2023. Retrieved 14 August 2023.
  60. 1 2 3 Kelly, Brett E.; Bhattacharya, Indrasen; Heidari, Hossein; Shusteff, Maxim; Spadaccini, Christopher M.; Taylor, Hayden K. (2019-01-31). "Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction". Science. 363 (6431): 1075–1079. Bibcode:2019Sci...363.1075K. doi: 10.1126/science.aau7114 . ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   30705152.
  61. 1 2 "Star Trek–like replicator creates entire objects in minutes". Science. 2019-01-31. Retrieved 2019-01-31.
  62. 1 2 Kelly, Brett; Bhattacharya, Indrasen; Shusteff, Maxim; Panas, Robert M.; Taylor, Hayden K.; Spadaccini, Christopher M. (2017-05-16). "Computed Axial Lithography (CAL): Toward Single Step 3D Printing of Arbitrary Geometries". arXiv: 1705.05893 [cs.GR].
  63. 1 2 "German RepRap introduces L280, first Liquid Additive Manufacturing (LAM) production-ready 3D printer". 3ders.org. Retrieved 2019-04-13.
  64. Davies, Sam (2018-11-02). "German RepRap to present series-ready Liquid Additive Manufacturing system at Formnext". TCT Magazine. Retrieved 2019-04-13.
  65. "German RepRap presenting Liquid Additive Manufacturing technology at RAPID+TCT". TCT Magazine. 2017-05-10. Retrieved 2019-04-13.
  66. Scott, Clare (2018-11-02). "German RepRap to Present Liquid Additive Manufacturing and L280 3D Printer at Formnext". 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing. Retrieved 2019-04-13.
  67. "German RepRap develops new polyurethane material for Liquid Additive Manufacturing". TCT Magazine. 2017-08-02. Retrieved 2019-04-13.
  68. "Essentium to acquire collider to advance DLP 3D printing technology". Make Parts Fast. 20 July 2021. Archived from the original on 3 April 2023. Retrieved 3 April 2023.
  69. "3D Printer Uses Standard Paper". www.rapidtoday.com.
  70. Yang, Y.; Gong, Y.; Qu, S. (2019). "Additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of 316L stainless steel powder: Densification, microhardness and residual stress" . J Mech Sci Technol. 33 (12): 5797–5807. doi:10.1007/s12206-019-1126-z. S2CID   214298577.
  71. Boisselier, D.; Sankaré, S.; Engel, T. (2014). "Improvement of the Laser Direct Metal Deposition Process in 5-axis Configuration". Physics Procedia. 56 (8th International Conference on Laser Assisted Net Shape Engineering LANE 2014): 239–249. Bibcode:2014PhPro..56..239B. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.168 . S2CID   109491084.
  72. Li, L.; Haghighi, A.; Yang, Y. (2018). "A novel 6-axis hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing process: Design and case studies". Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 33: 150–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.008 . S2CID   139579311.
  73. "Adding Features with DED". AddUp. 17 July 2020. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
  74. Beese, Allison M.; Carroll, Beth E. (2015-12-21). "Review of Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Made by Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Powder Feedstock". JOM. 68 (3): 724–734. Bibcode:2016JOM....68c.724B. doi:10.1007/s11837-015-1759-z. ISSN   1047-4838. S2CID   138250882.
  75. Gibson, Ian; Rosen, David; Stucker, Brent (2015). "Chapter 10". Additive Manufacturing Technologies - Springer (PDF). doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3. ISBN   978-1-4939-2112-6. S2CID   114833020.
  76. Surovi, Nowrin Akter; Hussain, Shaista; Soh, Gim Song (2022). A Study of Machine Learning Framework for Enabling Early Defect Detection in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Processes. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Vol. 86229. pp. V03AT03A002.
  77. Nilsiam, Yuenyong; Haselhuhn, Amberlee; Wijnen, Bas; Sanders, Paul; Pearce, Joshua M. (2015). "Integrated Voltage – Current Monitoring and Control of Gas Metal Arc Weld Magnetic Ball-Jointed Open Source 3-D Printer". Machines. 3 (4): 339–51. doi: 10.3390/machines3040339 .
  78. Pinar, A.; Wijnen, B.; Anzalone, G. C.; Havens, T. C.; Sanders, P. G.; Pearce, J. M. (2015). "Low-cost Open-Source Voltage and Current Monitor for Gas Metal Arc Weld 3-D Printing". Journal of Sensors. 2015: 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2015/876714 .
  79. Magalhães, Samuel; Sardinha, Manuel; Vicente, Carlos; Leite, Marco; Ribeiro, Relógio; Vaz, Maria; Reis, Luís (2021-08-23). "Validation of a low-cost selective powder deposition process through the characterization of tin bronze specimens". The Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 235 (12): 2681–2691. doi:10.1177/14644207211031941. S2CID   238738655.
  80. Li, Zongan; Xu, Mengjia; Wang, Jiahang; Zhang, Feng (October 2022). "Recent Advances in Cryogenic 3D Printing Technologies". Advanced Engineering Materials. 24 (10) 2200245. doi:10.1002/adem.202200245. ISSN   1438-1656. S2CID   248488161.
  81. 1 2 Zhang, Wei; Leu, Ming C; Ji, Zhiming; Yan, Yongnian (1999-06-01). "Rapid freezing prototyping with water". Materials & Design. 20 (2): 139–145. doi:10.1016/S0261-3069(99)00020-5. ISSN   0261-3069.
  82. Tan, Zhengchu; Parisi, Cristian; Di Silvio, Lucy; Dini, Daniele; Forte, Antonio Elia (2017-11-24). "Cryogenic 3D Printing of Super Soft Hydrogels". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 16293. Bibcode:2017NatSR...716293T. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16668-9. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   5701203 . PMID   29176756.
  83. Xiong, Zhuo; Yan, Yongnian; Wang, Shenguo; Zhang, Renji; Zhang, Chao (2002-06-07). "Fabrication of porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering via low-temperature deposition". Scripta Materialia. 46 (11): 771–776. doi:10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00071-4. ISSN   1359-6462.
  84. Huang, Tieshu; Mason, Michael S.; Hilmas, Gregory E.; Leu, Ming C. (2006-06-01). "Freeze-form extrusion fabrication of ceramic parts". Virtual and Physical Prototyping. 1 (2): 93–100. doi:10.1080/17452750600649609. ISSN   1745-2759. S2CID   135763440.
  85. 1 2 Wohlers, Terry (2016). "Wohlers Report 2016". Wohlers Associates. Retrieved 2026-01-11.
  86. O'Connor, Daniel (2018-02-22). "Can you jig it? 3D printing inside Volkswagen Autoeuropa". TCT Magazine. Retrieved 2018-11-28.
  87. Griffiths, Laura (2018-11-22). "How desktop 3D printers became an essential industry tool". TCT Magazine. Retrieved 2018-11-28.
  88. "Royal Netherlands Air Force recruits Ultimaker 3D printers for maintenance and repair operations". 3D Printing Industry. 2019-01-11. Retrieved 2019-01-11.
  89. "F-35 stealth fighter gets boost from 3D printing". 3D Printing Industry. 2018-07-27. Retrieved 2019-01-11.
  90. "Despite Market Woes, 3D Printing Has a Future Thanks to Higher Education - Bold". 2 December 2015.
  91. Butler O'Neal, Bridget (2019-03-12). "UCL School of Pharmacy: 3D Prints Affordable Continuous Flow Systems". 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing. Retrieved 2019-03-12.
  92. Hilton, Stephen; Peniche, Bruno; Rao, Zenobia; Penny (2019-02-28). "Modular 3D Printed Compressed Air Driven Continuous-Flow Systems for Chemical Synthesis". ChemRxiv . doi: 10.26434/chemrxiv.7781033.v1 .
  93. "UMass Amherst Library Opens 3-D Printing Innovation Center". Archived from the original on 2015-04-02. Retrieved 2017-02-24.
  94. "3D Printing Trends July 2016". 3D Hubs. Retrieved 2016-07-12.
  95. "What's up with Original Prusa i3? - Prusa Printers". 2016-03-02. Retrieved 2016-07-12.
  96. "Hoosier Daddy – The Largest Delta 3D Printer In the World". 3D Printer World. Punchbowl Media. 2014-09-23. Archived from the original on 2014-10-26. Retrieved 2024-10-17.
  97. McKenna, Beth (2014-09-26). "The Next Big Thing in 3-D Printing: Big Area Additive Manufacturing, or BAAM". The Motley Fool. Retrieved 2014-09-28.
  98. J. L. Wasserman; et al. (2008). "Fabrication of One-Dimensional Programmable-Height Nanostructures via Dynamic Stencil Deposition". Review of Scientific Instruments . 79 (7) 073909: 073909–073909–4. arXiv: 0802.1848 . Bibcode:2008RScI...79g3909W. doi:10.1063/1.2960573. PMID   18681718. S2CID   9775171.
  99. Patel, Prachi (5 March 2013). "Micro 3-D Printer Creates Tiny Structures in Seconds". MIT Technology Review.
  100. Grant-Jacob, James A.; Mills, Benjamin; Feinaeugle, Matthias; Sones, Collin L.; Oosterhuis, Gerrit; Hoppenbrouwers, Marc B.; Eason, Robert W. (2013-06-01). "Micron-scale copper wires printed using femtosecond laser-induced forward transfer with automated donor replenishment" (PDF). Optical Materials Express. 3 (6): 747. Bibcode:2013OMExp...3..747G. doi: 10.1364/ome.3.000747 . ISSN   2159-3930.

Further reading