Allison T78

Last updated
T78
Type Turboprop
National originUnited States
Manufacturer Allison Engine Company
First runMarch 1965

The Allison T78 was a turboprop engine that first ran in March 1965. It used a regenerator that recovered and reused exhaust heat to reduce fuel consumption. [1]

Contents

Development

On February 21, 1963, the United States Navy mailed request for proposals to five engine companies to solicit bids for its regenerative turboprop engine (RTE) program. [2] The program would attempt to lower the brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) of a turboprop from 0.5 to 0.3 pounds per horsepower-hour (300 to 180 grams per kilowatt-hour), [3] which would approximately equal the BSFC of a turbo-compound reciprocating engine. [2] In July 1963, the U.S. Navy chose the Model 545-B2 from the Allison Division of General Motors for development as a regenerative turboprop engine. Allison was chosen instead of bids from Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, Curtiss-Wright, and Avco Lycoming. [4] The engine was to be used for the aircraft carrier-based VSX airplane and a new version of the Lockheed P-3A Orion anti-submarine warfare (ASW) aircraft. [5] It also had possible applications as an airborne early warning (AEW) aircraft or a patrol aircraft, [6] and the U.S. Army studied variants of the engine to power its proposed heavy lift helicopter. [7] [8] [9] The 545-B2 was given the U.S. military aircraft engine designation of T78. It was scheduled to complete the preliminary flight rating test (PFRT) by December 1966 and model qualification testing (MQT) by April 1968. [10]

However, in March 1965 it was revealed that the Navy's request to fund development of the T78 for fiscal year 1965 had been rejected. [11] In that month, the T78 had run for the first time, one month ahead of schedule. [1] The T78 project was abandoned after about 350 hours of testing, because the Navy lacked a clear operational requirement for it. [6]

Design

The engine had a regenerated design, which preheated the air that exited the compressor in a heat exchanger with hot air from the engine's exhaust before the compressed air entered the combustion chamber. The regenerator section formed a large ringlike duct surrounding the exhaust nozzle and contained about 4,500 tubes. Because of this design, the temperature of the compressed air entering the combustion chamber was several hundred degrees hotter than air from an equivalent non-regenerated engine. The design of the regenerator was provided by Garrett AiResearch. The regenerated engine was designed for possible new classes of military aircraft, which would be required to have the ability to stay airborne for three or more days at a time. [12]

Variants

T78-A-2
Military turboprop variant.
545-B2
Internal designation for the baseline T78 turboprop. [10] The engine targeted a BSFC of 0.3 lb/(hp⋅h) (180 g/kWh) to match reciprocating engine rates of BSFC. Chosen by the U.S. Navy in July 1963 to install on anti-submarine aircraft. Also drew U.S. Air Force interest as a high-endurance missile-launching aircraft. [4]
545-C2
Front-drive regenerative turboshaft that has variable speed and constant turbine inlet temperature. Weight of 1,141 lb (518 kg), sea-level static military power of 4,105 shp (3,061 kW), and BSFC of 0.503 lb/(hp⋅h) (306 g/kWh). [7]
545-C3
Similar to the 545-C2 but has constant speed and variable turbine inlet temperature. [7]
546-C2
Non-regenerative turboshaft that has variable speed and variable turbine inlet temperature. [7]
546-C3
Similar to the 546-C2 but has constant speed. Weight of 681 lb (309 kg), sea-level static military power of 4,511 shp (3,364 kW), and BSFC of 0.479 lb/(hp⋅h) (291 g/kWh). [7]
548-C2
Rear-drive, non-regenerative, free-turbine turboshaft that has direct-drive and 3.22:1 reduction gearbox options. [7] Sea-level static military power of 4,490 shp (3,350 kW) for direct drive or 4,468 shp (3,332 kW) for reduction gearbox. [8]
548-D2
Regenerative version of the 548-C2. [9]
548-RT
Named for its remote turbine (RT) drive system, [13] as it resembles the 548-C2 but without the free turbine. Sea-level static military power of 4,354 shp (3,247 kW), and BSFC of 0.496 lb/(hp⋅h) (302 g/kWh). [7]

Specifications (T78-A-2)

Data from 1966 Aerospace Year Book, page 497 [14]

General characteristics

Components

Performance

See also

Related development

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Napier Nomad</span> British diesel aircraft engine

The Napier Nomad is a British diesel aircraft engine designed and built by Napier & Son in 1949. They combined a piston engine with a turbine to recover energy from the exhaust and thereby improve fuel economy. Two versions were tested, the complex Nomad I which used two propellers, each driven by the mechanically independent stages, and the Nomad II, using the turbo-compound principle, coupled the two parts to drive a single propeller. The Nomad II had the lowest specific fuel consumption figures seen up to that time. Despite this the Nomad project was cancelled in 1955 having spent £5.1 million on development, as most interest had passed to turboprop designs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce T406</span> Rolls-Royce North America turboshaft aircraft engine (1986)

The Rolls-Royce T406 is a turboshaft engine that powers the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey tiltrotor. The engine delivers 6,000 shp (4,470 kW).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce AE 2100</span> Turboprop aircraft engine family

The Rolls-Royce AE 2100 is a turboprop developed by Allison Engine Company, now part of Rolls-Royce North America. The engine was originally known as the GMA 2100, when Allison was a division of former corporate parent General Motors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100</span> Aircraft engine family

The Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100 aircraft engine family is a series of 1,800 to 5,000 shaft horsepower turboprops manufactured by Pratt & Whitney Canada. Pratt & Whitney Canada dominates the turboprops market with 89% of the turboprop regional airliner installed base in 2016, leading GE Aviation and Allison Engine Company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kuznetsov NK-12</span> 1950s Soviet turboprop aircraft engine

The Kuznetsov NK-12 is a Soviet turboprop engine of the 1950s, designed by the Kuznetsov design bureau. The NK-12 drives two large four-bladed contra-rotating propellers, 5.6 m (18 ft) diameter (NK-12MA), and 6.2 m (20 ft) diameter (NK-12MV). It is the most powerful turboprop engine to enter service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allison T56</span> American-built military turboprop (1954–)

The Allison T56 is an American single-shaft, modular design military turboprop with a 14-stage axial flow compressor driven by a four-stage turbine. It was originally developed by the Allison Engine Company for the Lockheed C-130 Hercules transport entering production in 1954. It has been a Rolls-Royce product since 1995 when Allison was acquired by Rolls-Royce. The commercial version is designated 501-D. Over 18,000 engines have been produced since 1954, logging over 200 million flying hours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce Tyne</span> 1950s British turboprop aircraft engine

The Rolls-Royce RB.109 Tyne is a twin-shaft turboprop engine developed in the mid to late 1950s by Rolls-Royce Limited to a requirement for the Vickers Vanguard airliner. It was first test flown during 1956 in the nose of a modified Avro Lincoln. Following company naming convention for gas turbine engines this turboprop design was named after the River Tyne.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce Gnome</span> 1950s British turboshaft aircraft engine

The Rolls-Royce Gnome is a British turboshaft engine originally developed by the de Havilland Engine Company as a licence-built General Electric T58, an American mid-1950s design. The Gnome came to Rolls-Royce after their takeover of Bristol Siddeley in 1968, Bristol having absorbed de Havilland Engines Limited in 1961.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric GE38</span> Gas turbine

The General Electric GE38 is a gas turbine developed by GE Aviation for turboprop and turboshaft applications. It powers the Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion as the T408.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric T700</span> Family of turboshaft and turboprop engines

The General Electric T700 and CT7 are a family of turboshaft and turboprop engines in the 1,500–3,000 shp (1,100–2,200 kW) class.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lycoming LTS101</span> Turboshaft engine family

The LycomingLTS101 is a turboshaft engine family ranging from 650 to 850 shaft horsepower, used in a number of popular helicopters, and, as the LTP101 turboprop, light aircraft. Both models carry the US military designation T702. The engine was originally designed at the Lycoming Turbine Engine Division in Stratford, Connecticut, but is now produced by Honeywell Aerospace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric T64</span> Turboshaft engine

The General Electric T64 is a free-turbine turboshaft engine that was originally developed for use on helicopters, but which was later used on fixed-wing aircraft as well. General Electric introduced the engine in 1964. The original engine design included technical innovations such as corrosion resistant and high-temperature coatings. The engine features a high overall pressure ratio, yielding a low specific fuel consumption for its time. Although the compressor is all-axial, like the earlier General Electric T58, the power turbine shaft is coaxial with the HP shaft and delivers power to the front of the engine, not rearwards. Fourteen compressor stages are required to deliver the required overall pressure ratio. Compressor handling is facilitated by 4 rows of variable stators. Unlike the T58, the power turbine has 2 stages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce RR500</span> Family of small gas turbine engines

The Rolls-Royce RR500 is a family of small gas turbine engines developed by Rolls-Royce Corporation. The RR500TP turboprop variant was intended for use in small aircraft. The RR500TS was the turboshaft variant designed for light helicopters. Development of the RR500 was abandoned in 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Honeywell T55</span> Family of turboprop aircraft engines

The Honeywell T55 is a turboshaft engine used on American helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft since the 1950s, and in unlimited hydroplanes since the 1980s. As of 2021, more than 6,000 of these engines have been built. It is produced by Honeywell Aerospace, a division of Honeywell based in Phoenix, Arizona, and was originally designed by the Turbine Engine Division of Lycoming Engines in Stratford, Connecticut, as a scaled-up version of the smaller Lycoming T53. The T55 serves as the engine on several major applications including the CH-47-Chinook, the Bell 309, and the Piper PA-48 Enforcer. The T55 also serves as the core of the Lycoming ALF 502 turbofan. Since the T55 was first developed, progressive increases in airflow, overall pressure ratio, and turbine inlet temperature have more than tripled the power output of the engine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allison T38</span>

The Allison T38 was an early turboprop engine developed by Allison Engine Company during the late 1940s. The T38 became the basis for the very successful family of Allison T56 turboprop engine.

The Saturn/Lyulka AL-34 was an unbuilt turboshaft/turboprop engine for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft, proposed by the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. In turboprop form, the engine was offered for light aircraft such as the Sukhoi Su-86 eight-passenger business airplane, the Myasishchev M-101T Gzhel business jet, the ROS-Aeroprogress T-101 Grach nine-passenger aircraft, its derivative T-108 Zolotoy Orel nineteen-passenger aircraft, and the Krunichev T-511 "AIST-M". As a turboshaft, the AL-34 was proposed to power the Mil Mi-54 and the Kazan Ansat helicopters. The engine was also considered for unconventional aircraft such as the Mil Mi-30L Vintoplan tiltrotor aircraft, and it was to be an auxiliary engine for powering the boundary layer control system and air cushion on the EKIP flying saucer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pratt & Whitney XT57</span>

The Pratt & Whitney XT57 was an axial-flow turboprop engine developed by Pratt & Whitney in the mid-1950s. The XT57 was developed from the Pratt & Whitney J57 turbojet.

The Allison T61 was a 6,500-shaft-horsepower (4,800-kilowatt) turboprop engine that was to power the 1959 version of the proposed Lockheed Super Hercules military and civil freight aircraft. The U.S. Air Force (USAF) had helped Allison fund the development of the T61 for four years. Lockheed had received orders from Pan American World Airways and Slick Airways for a total of 18 aircraft, but both orders were contingent on the military ordering the aircraft by September 30, 1959, around the date that the USAF's engine development contract expired. The development contract was extended temporarily to November 30, 1959, but the T61 development effort was canceled by January 1960, after USD$37.5 million had been put into the engine's development. Four T61 engines had run on the test stand at the time of cancellation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allison T56 variants</span> Range of American turboprop aircraft engines

The Allison T56 turboprop engine has been developed extensively throughout its production run, the many variants are described by the manufacturer as belonging to four main series groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lotarev D-136</span> Turboshaft helicopter engine

The Lotarev D-136 is a turboshaft engine from the ZMKB Progress Design Bureau. The engine powers the Mil Mi-26 "Halo" helicopter. Development of the engine had begun in about 1972.. The D-136 first flew on a production Mi-26 helicopter in 1980.

References

  1. 1 2 Olbina, Milan C., ed. (March 26, 1965). "T78 engine makes first run". AllisoNews. Vol. 24, no. 20. p. 3. OCLC   42343144.
  2. 1 2 "Engine bids sought". Aviation Week & Space Technology . Vol. 78, no. 12. March 25, 1963. p. 33. ISSN   0005-2175.
  3. "Long-endurance, subsonic aircraft studies are revived by Air Force". Aviation Week & Space Technology . Vol. 78, no. 7. February 18, 1963. p. 40. ISSN   0005-2175.
  4. 1 2 "Allison regenerative engine design shown". Aviation Week & Space Technology . Vol. 79, no. 2. July 8, 1963. p. 27. ISSN   0005-2175.
  5. Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives (June 4, 1964). Government and science: Distribution of federal research funds; indirect costs re federal grants (Report). p. 676. hdl:2027/mdp.39015035508046.
  6. 1 2 Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives (April 19, 1966). Department of Defense appropriations for 1967 (Report). pp. 289–290. hdl:2027/mdp.35112104241825.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Allison Division 1965, p.  12, 15
  8. 1 2 Burroughs 1965, p.  262
  9. 1 2 Dutton 1967, pp.  53, 55
  10. 1 2 Allison Division 1965, p.  213
  11. United States Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations (March 2–8, 1965). Department of Defense appropriations, 1966: hearings, eighty-ninth congress, first session, on H.R. 9221 (Report). Vol. 1. pp.  467, 818. hdl:2027/uc1.31210019457942.
  12. Butz, J. S. Jr., ed. (January 1964). "Tech talk". Air Force and Space Digest. Vol. 47, no. 1. pp. 73–74. hdl:2027/osu.32435061974176. ISSN   0002-2349.
  13. Allison Division 1965, p.  23
  14. Haggerty, James J., ed. (1966). The 1966 Aerospace Year Book (PDF) (44th ed.). American Aviation Publications, Inc. p. 497. OCLC   317228872.
  15. Allison Division 1965, p.  11

Bibliography