Body language

Last updated
Two women talking to each other. Notice the woman in blue has an arm next to her body, the other uses hers to gesticulate; both are signs of body language. TwoWomenTalkingBodyLanguage.jpg
Two women talking to each other. Notice the woman in blue has an arm next to her body, the other uses hers to gesticulate; both are signs of body language.

Body language is a type of communication in which physical behaviors, as opposed to words, are used to express or convey information. Such behavior includes facial expressions, body posture, gestures, eye movement, touch and the use of space. The term body language is usually applied in regard to people but may also be applied to animals. [1] The study of body language is also known as kinesics. [2] Although body language is an important part of communication, most of it happens without conscious awareness.

Contents

Body language differs from sign language, which are languages with complex grammar systems and exhibiting the fundamental properties considered to exist in all true languages. [3] [4] Body language, on the other hand, does not have a grammar system and must be interpreted broadly, instead of having an absolute meaning corresponding with a certain movement. It is, technically, not a language. [5] Body language more so refers to the often unconscious reactions we tend to have in relation to observed stimuli.

Within a society, consensus exists regarding the accepted understandings and interpretations of specific behaviors. There also is controversy on whether body language is universal. Body language, a subset of nonverbal communication, complements verbal communication in social interaction. In fact, some researchers conclude that nonverbal communication accounts for the majority of information transmitted during interpersonal interactions. [6] It helps to establish the relationship between two people and regulates interaction, yet it can be ambiguous. The interpretation of body language tends to vary in different cultural contexts.

Physical expressions

Facial expressions

Facial expression is a part of body language and the expression of emotion. An accurate interpretation of it relies on interpreting multiple signs in combination – such as the movement of the eyes, eyebrows, lips, nose and cheeks – in order to form an impression of a person's mood and state of mind; it should always be additionally considered in regard to the context in which it is occurring and the person's likely intention. [7]

While facial body language can be interpreted as a sign of genuine emotion, a lack of it may suggest a lack of sincerity. For example, a lack of wrinkles around the eyes may suggest a potentially fake smile. At one point, researchers believed that making a genuine smile was nearly impossible to do on command. More recently, however, a study conducted by researchers at Northeastern University found that people could convincingly fake a Duchenne smile, even when they were not feeling especially happy. [8]

The action of the pupil corresponds to mood, and it can communicate the mood of a person when it is observed. For instance, the research found that the person has no control over his pupils and they expanded when someone was interested in another person, or when they were looking at something. [9] Normally, one's eyes need to instinctively blink at around 20 times per minute, but merely looking at a person the viewer finds attractive can make this rate faster. [10]

Studies and behavioral experiments have shown that facial expressions and bodily expressions are congruent in terms of conveying visible signs of a person's emotional state. [11] [12] This means that the brain processes the other's facial and bodily expressions simultaneously. [11] Subjects in these studies judged emotions based on facial expressions with a high level of accuracy. This is because the face and the body are normally seen together in their natural proportions and the emotional signals from the face and body are well integrated.

Head and neck postures and signals

Nodding off the head is generally considered a sign of saying 'yes'. When used in conversation it may be interpreted as a sign of approval and encourage the speaker to go on. A single nod of the head is a sign of acknowledging another person in a respectful manner. In this manner, it can be regarded as similar to the Asian practice of bowing to a person as a sign of respect. Shaking the head is usually interpreted as meaning 'no'. In India, a head bobble is the tilting of the head from side to side, whose interpretation can be ambiguous and context-dependent. [13]

A tilting of the head to the side can be an expression of interest in what the other person is communicating. It may be a sign of curiosity, uncertainty, or questioning. If the head is propped up by the hand when the head is tilted then this may indicate disinterest or be a sign of thinking about something. A head that is tilted forwards slightly while being pulled backward may indicate being suspicious. [14]

The angle of facing and positioning of a person's head can be indicative of their mood—this should be considered in conjunction with patterns of muscular tension that occur concurrently with it, such as that of the face and neck. [note 1] When the head is tilted up this may demonstrate what some academics refer to as 'superiority emotions' such as self-assurance, pride, or contempt. [17] When it is tilted down, this may indicate 'inferiority emotions' such as shame, shyness, or respect. [18] When other factors are incorporated, such as the intensity of the feeling or gender, for example, the most accurate interpretation can change. Joy, for instance, is a superior emotion that is typically found in conjunction with a head tilted up. Contentment, which may be considered to be on the same spectrum as joy but at a lesser intensity, may instead feature the head being angled down somewhat. [19]

As a person's vocal chords are influenced physically by the tilt of their head and the respective pattern of muscle tension, it is possible to discern their head tilt by listening to how they talk. [20] [ better source needed ]

General body postures

The Tiff, a painting by Canadian artist Florence Carlyle (c. 1902) Florence Carlyle The Tiff.jpg
The Tiff, a painting by Canadian artist Florence Carlyle (c. 1902)

Emotions can also be detected through body postures. Research has shown that body postures are more accurately recognized when an emotion is compared with a different or neutral emotion. [21] For example, a person feeling angry would portray dominance over the other, and their posture would display approach tendencies. Comparing this to a person feeling fearful: they would feel weak, and submissive and their posture would display avoidance tendencies. [21]

Sitting or standing postures also indicate one's emotions. A person sitting still in the back of their chair, leaning forward with their head nodding along with the discussion implies that they are open, relaxed and generally ready to listen. On the other hand, a person who has their legs and arms crossed with the foot kicking slightly implies that they are feeling impatient and emotionally detached from the discussion. This being said, interpretation of said behavior can vary cross culturally [7] [ better source needed ]

In a standing discussion, a person standing with arms akimbo with feet pointed towards the speaker could suggest that they are attentive and interested in the conversation. However, a small difference in this posture could mean a lot. [7] [ better source needed ] In Bali standing with arms akimbo is considered rude and may send signals of aggression. [22]

Chest

In general terms, the relative fullness or shallowness of the chest, especially around the sternum, can be a key indicator of both mood and attitude. When the body language of the chest is assessed in everyday circumstances, it involves an instinctive assessment of these factors of shape and volume. When the posture of the chest is fuller, and it is positioned relatively forward, then this is a sign of confidence. If it is thrusting prominently forward, then this may be an indication that the person wants to be socially prominent and make a statement of physical confidence. When the chest is pulled back then this can indicate a less confident attitude.[ citation needed ]

If a person positions their chest closer towards another person it may be a sign of paying closer attention to them as part of a conversation, or, in other circumstances, it may be a sign of physical assertion and aggression. [23]

Gestures

Gestures are movements made with body parts (example hands, arms, fingers, head, legs) and they may be voluntary or involuntary. [7] Arm gestures can be interpreted in several ways. In a discussion, when one stands, sits or even walks with folded arms, it is normally not a welcoming gesture. It could mean that they have a closed mind and are most likely unwilling to listen to the speaker's viewpoint. Another type of arm gesture also includes an arm crossed over the other, demonstrating insecurity and a lack of confidence. [7] Hand gestures often signify the state of well-being of the person making them. Relaxed hands indicate confidence and self-assurance, while clenched hands may be interpreted as signs of stress or anger. If a person is wringing their hands, this demonstrates nervousness and anxiety. [7]

Finger gestures are also commonly used to exemplify one's speech as well as denote the state of well-being of the person making them. In certain cultures, pointing using one's index finger is deemed acceptable. However, pointing at a person may be viewed as aggressive in other cultures – for example, people who share Hindu beliefs consider finger pointing offensive. Instead, they point with a palm up open hand. [24] Likewise, the thumbs up gesture could show "OK" or "good" in countries like the United States, South Africa, France, Lebanon and Germany. But this same gesture is insulting in other countries like Iran, Bangladesh and Thailand, where it is the equivalent of showing the middle finger in the US. [24]

It is difficult to distinguish a behavior motivated by an out-group bias—a negative response to a member of a different group—from one fueled by stereotype effect—a cognitive association between members of a specific out‐group and a culturally held belief (Hamilton, 1981). [25] [ clarification needed ]

Handshakes

Handshakes are regular greeting rituals and commonly used when meeting, greeting, offering congratulations, expressing camaraderie, or after the completion of an agreement. Studies have categorized several handshake styles, including the finger squeeze, the bone crusher (shaking hands too strongly), the limp fish (shaking hands too weakly), etc. [24] Handshakes are popular in the United States and are appropriate for use between men and women. However, in Muslim cultures, men may not shake hands or touch women in any way and vice versa. Likewise, in Hindu cultures, Hindu men may never shake hands with women. Instead, they greet women by placing their hands as if praying.[ citation needed ]

A firm, friendly handshake has long been recommended in the business world as a way to make a good first impression, and the greeting is thought to date to ancient times as a way of showing a stranger you had no weapons. [26]

Breathing

Body language related to breathing and patterns of breathing can be indicative of a person's mood and state of mind; because of this, the relationship between body language and breathing is often considered in contexts such as business meetings and presentations.

Other subcategories

Oculesics

Oculesics, a subcategory of body language, is the study of eye movement, eye behavior, gaze, and eye-related nonverbal communication. As a social or behavioral science, oculesics is a form of nonverbal communication focusing on deriving meaning from eye behavior. [27] Oculesics is culturally dependent. For example, in traditional Anglo-Saxon culture, avoiding eye contact usually portrays a lack of confidence, certainty, or truthfulness. [28] However, in the Latino culture, direct or prolonged eye contact means that you are challenging the individual with whom you are speaking or that you have a romantic interest in the person. [28] Also, in many Asian cultures, prolonged eye contact may be a sign of anger or aggression.

Haptics

Research has also shown that people can accurately decode distinct emotions by merely watching others communicate via touch. [29]

Heslin outlines five haptic categories: [30]

The amount of touching that occurs within a culture is also culturally dependent.

Proxemics

A chart depicting Edward T. Hall's interpersonal distances of man, showing radius in feet and meters Personal Space.svg
A chart depicting Edward T. Hall's interpersonal distances of man, showing radius in feet and meters

Another notable area in the nonverbal world of body language is that of spatial relationships, which is also known as proxemics. Introduced by Edward T. Hall in 1966, proxemics is the study of measurable distances between people as they interact with one another. [35] In the book, Body Language, [36] Julius Fast mentioned that the signals that we send or receive to others through body language are reactions to others' invasions of our personal territories.

Hall also came up with four distinct zones in which most people operate: [35]

Intimate distance for embracing, touching or whispering

Close phase – less than 6 inches (15 cm)
Far phase – 6 to 18 inches (15 to 46 cm)

Personal distance for interactions among good friends or family members

Close phase – 1.5 to 2.5 feet (46 to 76 cm)
Far phase – 2.5 to 4 feet (76 to 122 cm)

Social distance for interactions among acquaintances

Close phase – 4 to 7 feet (1.2 to 2.1 m)
Far phase – 7 to 12 feet (2.1 to 3.7 m)

Public Distance used for public speaking

Close phase – 12 to 25 feet (3.7 to 7.6 m)
Far phase – 25 feet (7.6 m) or more.

In addition to physical distance, the level of intimacy between conversants can be determined by "socio-petal socio-fugal axis", or the "angle formed by the axis of the conversants' shoulders". [37]

Changing the distance between two people can convey a desire for intimacy, declare a lack of interest, or increase/decrease domination. [38] It can also influence the body language that is used. For example, when people talk they like to face each other. If forced to sit side by side, their body language will try to compensate for this lack of eye-to-eye contact by leaning in shoulder-to-shoulder. [38]

As with other types of body language, proximity range varies with culture. Hall suggested that "physical contact between two people ... can be perfectly correct in one culture, and absolutely taboo in another". [39]

Tone of voice

One of the reasons for this is that when a person's mood changes so does their breathing pattern. This influences their body language, and also their intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) which is a direct influence on, and discernible in, their tone of voice. For example, if a person is feeling confident, then their breathing pattern will deepen, their IAP will increase, and their tone of voice will sound fuller and stronger. If they are feeling anxious, their breathing will become too shallow, their IAP will decrease, and their voice will sound thinner and weaker. Thus, based upon a person's mood being reflected in their breathing pattern – which is a fundamental influencing factor to both tone of voice and body language – their tone of voice will tend to convey the same sense of mood as their body language, and vice versa. Notably, hands-free devices which use a digital voice, such as Amazon's Alexa, tend to omit or limit the sound of IAP from the digital voice. The voice therefore lacks a human-like fullness of tone and sounds more robotic.

Certain body postures can significantly influence the tone of voice. For instance, if someone is speaking while sitting in a chair with a hunched back, then this obstructs the breathing system, including the throat, and may muffle the tone of voice and convey the impression of being deenergised, unhappy or bored. Whereas if they were sitting up straight, this would allow the breathing system to be unobstructed and the tone of voice to be clearer, more energetic and focused.

Attitude

Mehrabian's rule Mehrabian.png
Mehrabian's rule

Human communication is extremely complex and one must look at the whole in order to make any determination as to the attitudes being expressed. [40]

Body language is a major contributor to the attitude a person conveys to others. Albert Mehrabian maintains that during a conversation dealing with feelings and attitudes (i.e., like-dislike), 7% of what is communicated is via what is said, 38% is via tone of voice, and the majority, 55%, is via body language. This is also referred to as the '7%–38%–55% Rule', [41] and is often considered in studies of human communications. While there is a wider debate about the percentage share which should be attributed to each of the three contributing factors, it is generally agreed upon that body language plays a fundamental role in determining the attitude a person conveys.

A person may alter their body language in order to alter the attitude they convey; this may in turn influence the rapport they have with another person. Whether a formal or informal attitude is conveyed may influence the other person's response. For instance, if an interviewer conveys a formal attitude, then this gives a more business-like impression, which may encourage the interviewee to give more serious answers. This may develop a more professional rapport overall between them. Alternatively, if the interviewer conveys an informal attitude, then this conveys a more open and casual impression. This may be used to elicit a more open response from the interviewee, encourage them to give more revealing answers, and potentially develop a more personal rapport.[ citation needed ]

Trust

It doesn't matter if it's a friendship or a business relationship, there has to be a certain level of trust between people. Understanding body language will help you to build trust and rapport. [42]

Trust is fundamental to all positive relationships between people. Body language which expresses trust will usually convey a sense of openness and warmth. Contrarily, mistrusting body language will appear relatively closed and cold. Body language which conveys a sense of trust can vary depending on the nature of the relationship. For example, for business, friendships, and intimate relationships there may be similarities in the body language used but it can also be significantly different. [43] [44]

Business

Body language which conveys trust in a business context is done so in a formal manner. This is in keeping with business etiquette in general where people present themselves in a professional and focused manner which also overtly recognises that the relationship has boundaries. A businessperson-like approach signals to another person that they can trust that business will be the main focus of the conversation and not anything else. The handshake is used commonly in business at the start of a meeting or negotiation. It shows that each person is willing to trust the other. It may be accompanied by a warm smile, but it would not usually be accompanied by more familiar, less formal body language such as a broad grin or pat on the shoulder. Business body language specifically attempts to avoid body language that conveys mistrust. For example, if someone crosses their arms or legs while speaking in a business context, it can give the impression of a barrier being presented to the other person. That person may then think that the person speaking does not trust them or is hiding something. Because barrier type body language may signal mistrust, it is avoided in business contexts. [45]

Friendship

Body language between friends is typically more expressive and informal than body language in business. Trust within a friendship is conveyed in numerous different expressive forms. Like in business a handshake may be used on meeting but this may also involve clasping two hands around one hand or placing a hand on the shoulder etc. [46] Body language which conveys trust between friends may also be significantly more expressive and physical than in business. Giving someone a pat on the back or a hug for example. [47]

People's natural willingness to act openly and warmly with their friends who they know well can appear more genuine when compared with how strangers present themselves as trustworthy in a business context. This is because friends can read each other's body language and facial expressions more easily. This means that they are surer of what the other person means and find it easier to respond accordingly. The interaction is therefore able to be more open and this can be seen when observing friends interact. [48] The communication whether in terms of body language or speech is freer and less constrained by a sense of formal etiquette.

Intimate relationships

The body language of trust in intimate relationships such as courtship and marriage is very open and often highly personalised, even if it is not necessarily as physically dynamic as that found in a friendship for example. In Western contexts holding hands is a common sign between intimate partners that expresses their affection and trust in each other. It is a gentle act which may extend over several minutes or more. In contrast, a handshake between friends may be quite exuberant and last for a few seconds. Trust is also conveyed in intimate relationships through people caressing and kissing each other. These actions are designed to convey openness and warmth in a highly personalised way. Each partner is communicating to the other that they are attracted to them and also that they trust them and are allowing them to touch them in a more intimate way than would otherwise be acceptable. Such body language may be established gradually over a period of courtship. The body language of intimate relationships cannot be used acceptably in non-intimate relationships. [49]

When people are in an intimate relationship, they often position themselves closer to each other than if they were in a different kind of relationship. Even though it may only be a small distance closer together, an observer can interpret this additional closeness to mean that they are in an intimate relationship. For example, spouses may sit, stand, and walk in each other's intimate space, whereas business colleagues may maintain more of a distance and outside of each other's intimate space. As the spouses are in an intimate relationship, they do not feel the need to maintain the same distance as the business colleagues. [50] Other signs that people who are in an intimate relationship may give include an impression that they feel at ease in each other's company, are committed to each other, and a sense of naturalness. [51]

Readiness

When you get onto a basketball court, all your teammates beside you, pumped up and ready to go, you form impressions of the other side, their strength and unity, their mood and body language. Of course the physicality element is stronger in sport, but something similar happens in politics, where you can read the mood of one side or the other simply by looking at them, sitting there all together. [52]

Body language can convey the impression of a readiness to take action. While this is always observable in the physical sense it can be further categorised as being 'readiness for physical exertion' or 'readiness for social interaction'. Noting that a person will typically be ready for both at any given time, and such categorisations are based upon which course of action they are primarily ready for at that moment. Such states of readiness influence the person's whole body, tone of voice, and what impression they convey through their body language. A state of increased readiness may also be referred to as being in a state of high energy or intensity. Relative to states of unreadiness, most states of readiness typically involve a deeper breathing pattern, increased excitation of the nervous system, and an increased heart rate. [52] Such physiological effects also influence the person's skin and its fullness of appearance. In relative terms, a person's skin will usually look fuller and more taut while in a state of readiness, and thinner and more flaccid in a state of unreadiness. A readiness for physical exertion typically means that these effects are increased further in terms of their intensity and visual prominence.

Readiness for physical exertion

This is when a person prepares themself for significant physical exertion. For example, before a sportsperson begins to play, they have prepared themself by warming up their body and psychologically focusing on the task ahead. They are thereby in a state of readiness to exert themself. To an observer they appear to be 'pumped up'. Their body language is suggestive that they are about to move quickly and more energetically, they appear physically larger, and their movements are often bigger.[ citation needed ]

Readiness for social interaction

A body language warm up routine consisting of power poses may also be used by people to prepare themselves for a social engagement. Harvard professor Amy Cuddy suggested in 2010 that two minutes of power posing – "standing tall, holding your arms out or toward the sky, or standing like Superman, with your hands on hips" – could increase confidence, [53] but retracted the advice and stopped teaching it after a 2015 study was unable to replicate the effect. [54]

Universal vs. culture-specific

Scholars have long debated on whether body language, particularly facial expressions, are universally understood. In Darwin's (1872) evolutionary theory, he postulated that facial expressions of emotion are inherited. [55] On the other hand, scholars have questioned if culture influences one's bodily expression of emotions. Broadly, the theories can be categorized into two models:

Cultural equivalence model

The cultural equivalence model predicts that "individuals should be equally accurate in understanding the emotions of ingroup and outgroup members" (Soto & Levenson, 2009). This model is rooted in Darwin's evolutionary theory, where he noted that both humans and animals share similar postural expressions of emotions such as anger/aggression, happiness, and fear. [56] These similarities support the evolution argument that social animals (including humans) have a natural ability to relay emotional signals with one another, a notion shared by several academics (Chevalier-Skolnikoff, 1974; Linnankoski, Laakso, Aulanko, & Leinonen, 1994). Where Darwin notes similarity in expression among animals and humans, the Cultural Equivalence Model notes similarity in expression across cultures in humans, even though they may be completely different.

One of the strongest pieces of evidence that supports this model was a study conducted by Paul Ekman and Friesen (1971), where members of a preliterate tribe in Papua New Guinea reliably recognized the facial expressions of individuals from the United States. Culturally isolated and with no exposure to US media, there was no possibility of cross-cultural transmission to the Papuan tribesmen. [57]

Cultural advantage model

On the other hand, the cultural advantage model predicts that individuals of the same race "process the visual characteristics more accurately and efficiently than other-race faces". [58] Other factors that increase accurate interpretation include familiarity with nonverbal accents. [59]

There are numerous studies that support both the cultural equivalence model and the cultural advantage model, but reviewing the literature indicates that there is a general consensus that seven emotions are universally recognized, regardless of cultural background: happiness, surprise, fear, anger, contempt, disgust, and sadness. [60]

Recently, scholars have shown that the expressions of pride and shame are universal. Tracy and Robins (2008) concluded that the expression of pride includes an expanded posture of the body with the head tilted back, with a low-intensity face and a non-Duchenne smile (raising the corner of the mouth). The expression of shame includes the hiding of the face, either by turning it down or covering it with the hands. [57]

Applications

Fundamentally, body language is seemed as an involuntary and unconscious phenomenon that adds to the process of communication. [61] Despite that, there have been certain areas where the conscious harnessing of body language – both in action and comprehension – have been useful. The use of body language has also seen an increase in application and use commercially, with large volumes of books and guides published designed to teach people how to be conscious of body language, and how to use it to benefit them in certain scenarios. [36]

The use of body language can be seen in a wide variety of fields. Body languages has seen applications in instructional teaching in areas such as second-language acquisition [62] and also to enhance the teaching of subjects like mathematics. A related use of body language is as a substitution to verbal language to people who lack the ability to use that, be it because of deafness or aphasia. Body language has also been applied in the process of detecting deceit through micro-expressions, both in law enforcement and even in the world of poker. [63]

Instructional teaching

Second-language acquisition

The importance of body language in second-language acquisition was inspired by the fact that to successfully learn a language is to achieve discourse, strategic, and sociolinguistic competencies. [64] Sociolinguistic competence includes understanding the body language that aids the use of a particular language. This is usually also highly culturally influenced. As such, a conscious ability to recognize and even perform this sort of body language is necessary to achieve fluency in a language beyond the discourse level.

The importance of body language to verbal language use is the need to eliminate ambiguity and redundancy in comprehension. [64] Pennycook (1985) suggests to limit the use of non-visual materials to facilitate the teaching of a second language to improve this aspect of communication. He calls this being not just bilingual but also 'bi-kinesic'. [65]

Enhancing teaching

Body language can be a useful aid not only in teaching a second language, but also in other areas. The idea behind using it is as a nonlinguistic input. [66] It can be used to guide, hint, or urge a student towards the right answer. This is usually paired off with other verbal methods of guiding the student, be it through confirmation checks or modified language use. Tai [67] in his 2014 paper provides a list of three main characteristic of body language and how they influence teaching. The features are intuition, communication, and suggestion.

  • The intuitive feature of body language used in teaching is the exemplification of the language, especially individual words, through the use of matching body language. For example, when teaching about the word "cry", teachers can imitate a crying person. This enables a deeper impression which is able to lead to greater understanding of the particular word. [67]
  • The communicative feature is the ability of body language to create an environment and atmosphere that is able to facilitate effective learning. A holistic environment is more productive for learning and the acquisition for new knowledge. [67]
  • The suggestive feature of body language uses body language as a tool to create opportunities for the students to gain additional information about a particular concept or word through pairing it with the body language itself. [67]

Detecting deceit

Law enforcement

Despite the absence of evidence indicating that non-verbal lie detection works, and its rejection by the scholarly community as an effective way to detect lies, law enforcement still relies on it. [68] Numerous Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Law Enforcement Bulletins have addressed body language as a purported tool for "evaluation truthfulness and detecting deception." [69] [70]

The body language of the members of law enforcement might influence the accuracy of eyewitness accounts. [71]

Poker

The game of poker involves not only an understanding of probability, but also the competence of reading and analyzing the body language of the opponents. A key component of poker is to be able to bluff opponents. To spot bluffing, players must have the ability to spot the individual "tics" of their opponents, known in poker as their "tells". Players also have to look out for signs that an opponent is doing well.

Visual arts

Folding your arms and looking away, in body language, can be interpreted as insecurity. The exaggerated use of the gesture by both characters is used to create a comedic impression. In Perfect Congruence.jpg
Folding your arms and looking away, in body language, can be interpreted as insecurity. The exaggerated use of the gesture by both characters is used to create a comedic impression.

Body language is often used to achieve a humorous effect in comedy productions. This may involve using body language which is exaggerated, repetitious, inappropriate for the circumstances or for the character, and any combination of these. Two or more characters can be used to emphasise each other's body language. Their gestures and mannerisms may be very similar, and in this manner amplify their comedic effect. Or they may be very different and thereby highlighted by way of contrast. Comedy double acts standardly use such methods of complementary comedic body language. [72]

Kinesics

Kinesics is the study and interpretation of nonverbal communication related to the movement of any part of the body or the body as a whole; [73] in layman's terms, it is the study of body language. However, Ray Birdwhistell, who is considered the founder of this area of study, never used the term body language, and did not consider it appropriate. He argued that what can be conveyed with the body does not meet the linguist's definition of language. [74]

Birdwhistell pointed out that "human gestures differ from those of other animals in that they are polysemic, that they can be interpreted to have many different meanings depending on the communicative context in which they are produced". And, he "resisted the idea that 'body language' could be deciphered in some absolute fashion". He also indicated that "every body movement must be interpreted broadly and in conjunction with every other element in communication". [74]

Despite that, body language is still more widely used than kinesics. Dr. Maziar Mir in his book Body Language of Iran, has defined body language as follows: to all gestures, postures, movements, human behaviour, body gestures, and even model and gesture of speaking, or all postures of making sounds without making a sound that is based on the age, sex, height, weight, and social or geographical status of human beings are referred to as body language or non-verbal communication.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ For example, the posture of the body has a corresponding pattern of muscle tension i.e. how muscles in the face and neck are contracted or relaxed while the person's head is tilted. This relationship is instinctively observed in conjunction with a person's posture. Men and women have been found to be perceived differently in regard to this relationship between posture and muscle tension. [15] According to Alain Mignault and Avi Chaudhuri and considered in regard to smiling:
    Indeed, a bowed head probably leads raters to perceive the contraction of the Zygomatic Major (Action Unit 12) and a raised head to perceive the contraction of the Triangularis (Action Unit 15). Second, although we found no significant difference in the perception of mouth contraction at zero degrees between male and female actors, a large difference is perceived at other head angles even though the expression itself is fixed. [16]
    Such a correspondence can be deliberately manipulated to produce different effects. For example, an actor can pose in a confident manner, while relaxing muscles in the neck which would ordinarily be more contracted in conjunction with the pose. He may thereby make it appear that he is actually afraid and the pose is merely an attempt to appear confident.

Related Research Articles

A facial expression is one or more motions or positions of the muscles beneath the skin of the face. According to one set of controversial theories, these movements convey the emotional state of an individual to observers. Facial expressions are a form of nonverbal communication. They are a primary means of conveying social information between humans, but they also occur in most other mammals and some other animal species.

Symbolic communication is the exchange of messages that change a priori expectation of events. Examples of this are modern communication technology and the exchange of information amongst animals. By referring to objects and ideas not present at the time of communication, a world of possibility is opened. In humans, this process has been compounded to result in the current state of modernity. A symbol is anything one says or does to describe something, and that something can have an array of many meanings. Once the symbols are learned by a particular group, that symbol stays intact with the object. Symbolic communication includes gestures, body language and facial expressions, as well as vocal moans that can indicate what an individual wants without having to speak. Research argues that about 55% of all communication stems from nonverbal language. Symbolic communication ranges from sign language to braille to tactile communication skills.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonverbal communication</span> Interpersonal communication through wordless (mostly visual) cues

Nonverbal communication (NVC) is the transmission of messages or signals through a nonverbal platform such as eye contact (oculesics), body language (kinesics), social distance (proxemics), touch (haptics), voice (paralanguage), physical environments/appearance, and use of objects. When communicating, we utilize nonverbal channels as means to convey different messages or signals, whereas others can interpret these message. The study of nonverbal communication started in 1872 with the publication of The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals by Charles Darwin. Darwin began to study nonverbal communication as he noticed the interactions between animals such as lions, tigers, dogs etc. and realized they also communicated by gestures and expressions. For the first time, nonverbal communication was studied and its relevance questioned. Today, scholars argue that nonverbal communication can convey more meaning than verbal communication.

Unconsciouscommunication is the subtle, unintentional, unconscious cues that provide information to another individual. It can be verbal l or it can be non-verbal. Some psychologists instead use the term honest signals because such cues are involuntary behaviors that often convey emotion whereas body language can be controlled. Many decisions are based on unconscious communication, which is interpreted and created in the right hemisphere of the brain. The right hemisphere is dominant in perceiving and expressing body language, facial expressions, verbal cues, and other indications that have to do with emotion but it does not exclusively deal with the unconscious.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Haptic communication</span> Communication via touch

Haptic communication is a branch of nonverbal communication that refers to the ways in which people and animals communicate and interact via the sense of touch. Touch is the most sophisticated and intimate of the five senses. Touch or haptics, from the ancient Greek word haptikos is extremely important for communication; it is vital for survival.

Kinesics is the interpretation of body communication such as facial expressions and gestures, nonverbal behavior related to movement of any part of the body or the body as a whole. The equivalent popular culture term is body language, a term Ray Birdwhistell, considered the founder of this area of study, neither used nor liked.

An emotional expression is a behavior that communicates an emotional state or attitude. It can be verbal or nonverbal, and can occur with or without self-awareness. Emotional expressions include facial movements like smiling or scowling, simple behaviors like crying, laughing, or saying "thank you," and more complex behaviors like writing a letter or giving a gift. Individuals have some conscious control of their emotional expressions; however, they need not have conscious awareness of their emotional or affective state in order to express emotion.

Dyssemia is a difficulty with receptive and/or expressive nonverbal communication. The word comes from the Greek roots dys (difficulty) and semia (signal). The term was coined by psychologists Marshall Duke and Stephen Nowicki in their 1992 book, Helping The Child Who Doesn't Fit In, to decipher the hidden dimensions of social rejection. These difficulties go beyond problems with body language and motor skills. Dyssemic persons exhibit difficulties with the acquisition and use of nonverbal cues in interpersonal relationships. "A classic set of studies by Albert Mehrabian showed that in face-to-face interactions, 55 percent of the emotional meaning of a message is expressed through facial, postural, and gestural means, and 38 percent of the emotional meaning is transmitted through the tone of voice. Only seven percent of the emotional meaning is actually expressed with words." Dyssemia represents the social dysfunction aspect of nonverbal learning disorder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oculesics</span>

Oculesics, a subcategory of kinesics, is the study of eye movement, behavior, gaze, and eye-related nonverbal communication. The term's specific designation slightly varies apropos of the field of study. Communication scholars use the term "oculesics" to refer to the investigation of culturally-fluctuating propensities and appreciations of visual attention, gaze and other implicitly effusive elements of the eyes. Comparatively, medical professionals may ascribe the same appellation to the measurement of a patient's ocular faculty, especially subsequent a cerebral or other injury.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mirroring</span> Subconscious imitative behaviour

Mirroring is the behavior in which one person subconsciously imitates the gesture, speech pattern, or attitude of another. Mirroring often occurs in social situations, particularly in the company of close friends or family, often going unnoticed by both parties. The concept often affects other individuals' notions about the individual that is exhibiting mirroring behaviors, which can lead to the individual building rapport with others.

Display rules are a social group or culture's informal norms that distinguish how one should express themselves. They function as a way to maintain the social order of a given culture, creating an expected standard of behaviour to guide people in their interactions. Display rules can help to decrease situational ambiguity, help individuals to be accepted by their social groups, and can help groups to increase their group efficacy. They can be described as culturally prescribed rules that people learn early on in their lives by interactions and socializations with other people. Members of a social group learn these cultural standards at a young age which determine when one would express certain emotions, where and to what extent.

Cognitive valence theory (CVT) is a theoretical framework that describes and explains the process of intimacy exchange within a dyad relationship. Peter A. Andersen, PhD created the cognitive valence theory to answer questions regarding intimacy relationships among colleagues, close friends and intimate friends, married couples and family members. Intimacy or immediacy behavior is that behavior that provides closeness or distance within a dyad relationship. Closeness projects a positive feeling in a relationship, and distance projects a negative feeling within a relationship. Intimacy or immediacy behavior can be negatively valenced or positively valenced. Valence, associated with physics, is used here to describe the degree of negativity or positivity in expected information. If your partner perceives your actions as negative, then the interaction may repel your partner away from you. If your partner perceives your actions as positive, then the interaction may be accepted and may encourage closeness. Affection and intimacy promotes positive valence in a relationship. CVT uses non-verbal and verbal communications criteria to analyze behavioral situations.

Non-verbal leakage is a form of non-verbal behavior that occurs when a person verbalizes one thing, but their body language indicates another, common forms of which include facial movements and hand-to-face gestures. The term "non-verbal leakage" got its origin in literature in 1968, leading to many subsequent studies on the topic throughout the 1970s, with related studies continuing today.

Power and dominance-submission are two key dimensions of relationships, especially close relationships in which parties rely on one another to achieve their goals and as such it is important to be able to identify indicators of dominance.

Body-to-body communication is a way of communicating with others through the use of nonverbal communication, without using speech or verbalization. It can include body language, facial expressions, and other bodily gestures in order to communicate with others without the need of verbal communication. Body-to-body communication accounts for postures, body language, physical touch, nonverbal language, and other bodily gestures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Posture (psychology)</span> Aspect of nonverbal communication

In humans, posture can provide a significant amount of important information through nonverbal communication. Psychological studies have also demonstrated the effects of body posture on emotions. This research can be traced back to Charles Darwin's studies of emotion and movement in humans and animals. Currently, many studies have shown that certain patterns of body movements are indicative of specific emotions. Researchers studied sign language and found that even non-sign language users can determine emotions from only hand movements. Another example is the fact that anger is characterized by forward whole body movement. The theories that guide research in this field are the self-validation or perception theory and the embodied emotion theory.

The Rich Representation Language, often abbreviated as RRL, is a computer animation language specifically designed to facilitate the interaction of two or more animated characters. The research effort was funded by the European Commission as part of the NECA Project. The NECA framework within which RRL was developed was not oriented towards the animation of movies, but the creation of intelligent "virtual characters" that interact within a virtual world and hold conversations with emotional content, coupled with suitable facial expressions.

Social cues are verbal or non-verbal signals expressed through the face, body, voice, motion and guide conversations as well as other social interactions by influencing our impressions of and responses to others. These percepts are important communicative tools as they convey important social and contextual information and therefore facilitate social understanding.

Emotions in virtual communication are expressed and understood in a variety of different ways from those in face-to-face interactions. Virtual communication continues to evolve as technological advances emerge that give way to new possibilities in computer-mediated communication (CMC). The lack of typical auditory and visual cues associated with human emotion gives rise to alternative forms of emotional expression that are cohesive with many different virtual environments. Some environments provide only space for text based communication, where emotions can only be expressed using words. More newly developed forms of expression provide users the opportunity to portray their emotions using images.

Nonverbal influence is the act of affecting or inspiring change in others' behaviors and attitudes by way of tone of voice or body language and other cues like facial expression. This act of getting others to embrace or resist new attitudes can be achieved with or without the use of spoken language. It is a subtopic of nonverbal communication. Many individuals instinctively associate persuasion with verbal messages. Nonverbal influence emphasizes the persuasive power and influence of nonverbal communication. Nonverbal influence includes appeals to attraction, similarity and intimacy.

References

  1. ↑ Poyatos, Fernando (2002). Nonverbal Communication Across Disciplines, Volume II. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 189. ISBN   1-55619-754-3.
  2. ↑ Fast, Julius (2014). "1. The Body is the Message". Body Language. Open Road Media.
  3. ↑ Klimt, Edward S.; & Belling, Ursula. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN   0674807952.
  4. ↑ Candler, Wendy; & Lille-Martin, Diane. (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals.: Cambridge University Press.
  5. ↑ Marschark, Mark (1993). Psychological Development of Deaf Children. Oxford University Press. p. 27. ISBN   0-19-506899-8.
  6. ↑ Onsager, Mark. "Understanding the Importance of Non-Verbal Communication", Body Language Dictionary Archived 2017-05-06 at the Wayback Machine , New York, 19 May 2014. Retrieved on 26 October 2014.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kurien, Daisy N (March 1, 2010). "Body Language: Silent Communicator at the Workplace". IUP Journal of Soft Skills. 4 (1/2): 29–36.
  8. ↑ Brunstein, A. (2007). Eye to I (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  9. ↑ thinking, What someone's eyes can tell you about what they are (30 November 2001). "How To Read Anyone's Body Language Using Eye Signals". www.psychologistworld.com. Retrieved 2019-01-17.
  10. ↑ "Butler Newsroom | 9 Wordless Ways Someone Says, "I Love You"". news.butler.edu. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
  11. 1 2 Gu, Yuanyuan; Mai, Xiaoqin; Luo, Yue-jia; Di Russo, Francesco (23 July 2013). "Do Bodily Expressions Compete with Facial Expressions? Time Course of Integration of Emotional Signals from the Face and the Body". PLOS ONE. 8 (7): e66762. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...866762G. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066762 . PMC   3720771 . PMID   23935825.
  12. ↑ Kret, ME; Pichon, S; Grezes, J; de Gelder, B (Jan 15, 2011). "Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study" (PDF). NeuroImage. 54 (2): 1755–1762. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.012. PMID   20723605. S2CID   533689.
  13. ↑ Lewis, Hedgwig (2012). "The Head and Torso: Wobbling". Body Language. Sage. ISBN   9788132116905.
  14. ↑ Lewis, Hedgwig (2012). "The Head and Torso". Body Language. Sage. ISBN   9788132116905.
  15. ↑ Mignault, Alain & Chaudhuri, Avi (2003). "The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion". Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 27 (2): 111–132. doi:10.1023/A:1023914509763. S2CID   73547442 . Retrieved 9 February 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ↑ Mignault, Alain & Chaudhuri, Avi (2003). "The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion". Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 27 (2): 128. doi:10.1023/A:1023914509763. S2CID   73547442 . Retrieved 9 February 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ↑ Mignault, Alain & Chaudhuri, Avi (2003). "The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion". Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 27 (2): 111–132. doi:10.1023/A:1023914509763. S2CID   73547442 . Retrieved 9 February 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. ↑ Mignault, Alain & Chaudhuri, Avi (2003). "The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion". Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 27 (2): 111–132. doi:10.1023/A:1023914509763. S2CID   73547442 . Retrieved 9 February 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. ↑ Mignault, Alain & Chaudhuri, Avi (2003). "The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion". Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 27 (2): 111–132. doi:10.1023/A:1023914509763. S2CID   73547442 . Retrieved 9 February 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ↑ Treasure, Julian (2017). "Posture". How to be Heard. Mango. ISBN   978-1633536715. Your voice starts with your posture, especially the angle of your neck because your vocal chords are physically altered when you move your head forward, backward, or side to side.
  21. 1 2 Mondloch, Catherine J.; Nelson, Nicole L.; Horner, Matthew; Pavlova, Marina (10 September 2013). "Asymmetries of Influence: Differential Effects of Body Postures on Perceptions of Emotional Facial Expressions". PLOS ONE. 8 (9): e73605. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...873605M. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073605 . PMC   3769306 . PMID   24039996.
  22. ↑ Wikan, Unni (1987). "Public Grace and Private Fears: Gaiety, Offense, and Sorcery in Northern Bali". Ethos. 15 (4): 337–365. doi:10.1525/eth.1987.15.4.02a00010. ISSN   0091-2131. JSTOR   640343.
  23. ↑ Coon, Dennis, & Mitterer, John O. (2010). Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and Behavior (12th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. p. 348. ISBN   978-0-495-59913-5.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. 1 2 3 Black, Roxie M. (2011). "Cultural Considerations of Hand Use". Journal of Hand Therapy. 24 (2): 104–11. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2010.09.067. PMID   21109395.
  25. ↑ Hinzman, Lindsay; Kelly, Spencer D. (2013-01-01). "Effects of emotional body language on rapid out-group judgments". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 49 (1): 152–155. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.010. ISSN   0022-1031.
  26. ↑ Ramadas, Nidhin. "Handshake". Beckman Institute. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  27. ↑ Sullivan, Larry E. (31 August 2009). The Sage Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (illustrated ed.). Sqge Publications. p. 577. ISBN   978-1412951432.
  28. 1 2 Cruz, William (2001). "Differences In Nonverbal Communication Styles between Cultures: The Latino-Anglo Perspective". Leadership and Management in Engineering. 1 (4): 51–53. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2001)1:4(51) . ISSN   1532-6748 . Retrieved 14 October 2014.
  29. ↑ Hertenstein, Matthew J.; Keltner, Dacher; App, Betsy; Bulleit, Brittany A.; Jaskolka, Ariane R. (2006). "Touch Communicates Distinct Emotions" (PDF). Emotion. 6 (3): 528–533. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.421.2391 . doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.528. PMID   16938094.
  30. ↑ Heslin, R. (May 1974). "Steps toward a taxonomy of touching". Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago
  31. 1 2 Walton, Donald (1989). Are You Communicating?: You Can't Manage Without It (First ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies. p.  244. ISBN   978-0070680524.
  32. 1 2 Jones, Stanley E. & A. Elaine Yarbrough; Yarbrough, A. Elaine (1985). "A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch". Communication Monographs. 52 (1): 19–56. doi:10.1080/03637758509376094.
  33. ↑ Morris, Desmond (1977). Manwatching: A Field Guide to Human Behavior (illustrated ed.). Abrams. p.  320. ISBN   978-0810913103.
  34. ↑ Burgoon, Judee K.; Buller, David B.; Woodall, William Gill (1996). Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN   978-0070089952.
  35. 1 2 Hall, Edward T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books. ISBN   0385084765
  36. 1 2 Fast, Julius (2014). Body Language. Open Road Media. ISBN   978-1497622685.
  37. ↑ Moore, Nina (2010). Nonverbal Communication: Studies and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.[ ISBN missing ]
  38. 1 2 "The significance of Body Language" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 April 2010. Retrieved 14 October 2014.
  39. ↑ Hall, Edward T. (1968). "Proxemics" (PDF). Current Anthropology. 9 (2/3): 83–108. doi:10.1086/200975. JSTOR   2740724. S2CID   147398417 . Retrieved 14 October 2014.
  40. ↑ Loh, Wallace D. (1984). Social Research in the Judicial Process, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, p. 398[ ISBN missing ]
  41. ↑ Mehrabian, Albert (2009). "'Silent Messages' – A Wealth of Information About Nonverbal Communication (Body Language)". Personality & Emotion Tests & Software: Psychological Books & Articles of Popular Interest. Los Angeles: self-published. Retrieved October 23, 2018.
  42. ↑ Phipps, Robert (2012). It's What You Don't Say That Matters. John Wiley & Sons. p. 19. ISBN   978-0857081742.
  43. ↑ Job Readiness for Health Professionals. Elsevier. 2021. pp. 140–141. ISBN   978-0323430265.
  44. ↑ Agochiya, Davendra (2018). Life Competencies for Growth and Success A Trainer's Manual. Sage publications. p. 142. ISBN   978-9352805280.
  45. ↑ Wezowski, Wezowski, Kasia, Patryk (2018). Without Saying a Word: Master the Science of Body Language and Maximize Your Success. HarperCollins Leadership. pp. 89–90, 98, 116. ISBN   978-0814439746.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  46. ↑ Wezowski, Wezowski, Kasia, Patryk (2018). Without Saying a Word: Master the Science of Body Language and Maximize Your Success. HarperCollins Leadership. pp. 34–35. ISBN   978-0814439746.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  47. ↑ Eggert, Max A. (2012). Brilliant Body Language: Impress, Persuade and Succeed with the Power of Body Language (1 ed.). Prentice Hall.
  48. ↑ Blythe, Jim (2012). Marketing Essentials. Routledge. p. 173. ISBN   978-0080966243.
  49. ↑ Adrian Furnham, Evgeniya Petrova (2010). Body Language in Business: Decoding the Signals. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 154. ISBN   978-0230241466.
  50. ↑ Eggert, Max A. (2014). Understanding Body Language (1 ed.). Pearson Educational Limited. ISBN   978-1292084596.
  51. ↑ Kuhnke, Elizabeth (2015). Body Language for Dummies (3 ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. p. 229. ISBN   978-1119067399.
  52. 1 2 Campbell, Alastair, 'The Team Player: Edi Rama' in Winners: And How They Succeed, London: Arrow Books, p.143
  53. ↑ Haden, Jeff (5 December 2013). "8 Powerful Ways to Improve Your Body Language". Inc. Retrieved 29 December 2019.
  54. ↑ Carney, Dana R. (nd). "My position on "Power Poses"" (PDF). Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  55. ↑ Ekman, Paul (1971). "Universals and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion" (PDF). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. 19: 207–283. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-11. Retrieved 2014-10-13.
  56. ↑ Soto, Jose Angel; Levenson, Robert W. (2009). "Emotion recognition across cultures: The influence of ethnicity on empathic accuracy and physiological linkage". Emotion. 9 (6): 874–884. doi:10.1037/a0017399. PMC   2877627 . PMID   20001130.
  57. 1 2 Tracy, Jessica L.; Robins, Richard W. (2008). "The nonverbal expression of pride: Evidence for cross-cultural recognition" (PDF). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94 (3): 516–530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.516. PMID   18284295.
  58. ↑ O'Toole, Alice J.; Peterson, Jennifer; Deffenbacher, Kenneth A. (1996). "An "other-race effect" for categorizing faces by sex". Perception. 25 (6): 669–676. doi:10.1068/p250669. PMID   8888300. S2CID   7191979.
  59. ↑ Marsh, A.A.; Elfenbein, H.A.; Ambady, N. (2003). "Nonverbal "accents": Cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion". Psychological Science. 14 (4): 373–376. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.24461. PMID   12807413. S2CID   61782.
  60. ↑ Russell, James A. (1994). "Is There Universal Recognition of Emotion From Facial Expression? A Review of the Cross-Cultural Studies" (PDF). Psychological Bulletin. 115 (1): 102–141. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.102. PMID   8202574. S2CID   4823006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2014-10-13.
  61. ↑ D. Billups, Felice (2019). "The Qualitative Data Collection Cycle". Qualitative Data Collection Tools: Design, Development, and Applications. SAGE Publications, Inc. pp. 52–53. doi:10.4135/9781071878699.n7. ISBN   9781544334813. S2CID   246523087.
  62. ↑ Gregersen, Tammy S. (July 2007). "Language learning beyond words: Incorporating body language into classroom activities". Reflections on English Language Teaching. 6: 51–64.
  63. ↑ Caro, Mike (1994). The Body Language of Poker: Mike Caro's Book of Tells.
  64. 1 2 Kellerman, Susan (1992). "I see what you mean: The role of kinesic behaviour in listening and the implications for foreign and second language learning". Applied Linguistics. 13 (3): 239–258. doi:10.1093/applin/13.3.239.
  65. ↑ Pennycook, Alastair (1985). "Actions speak louder than words: Paralanguage, communication, and education". TESOL Quarterly. 19 (2): 259–282. doi:10.2307/3586829. JSTOR   3586829.
  66. ↑ Brandl, Klaus (2007). Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work.
  67. 1 2 3 4 Tai, Yuanyuan (2014). "The Application of Body Language in English Teaching". Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 5 (5): 1205–1209. doi: 10.4304/jltr.5.5.1205-1209 .
  68. ↑ Vrij, Aldert; Hartwig, Maria; Granhag, Pär Anders (2019). "Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception". Annual Review of Psychology. 70 (1): 295–317. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103135 . ISSN   0066-4308. PMID   30609913. S2CID   58562467.
  69. ↑ Pinizzoto, Anthony J.; Davis, Edward F.; Miller III, Charles E. (March 2006). "Dead Right". FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 75 (3): 1–8.
  70. ↑ Matsumoto, David; Hyi Sung, Hwang; Skinner, Lisa; Frank, Mark (June 2011). "Evaluating Truthfulness and Detecting Deception". FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 80 (6): 1–8.
  71. ↑ Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. October 1999. p. 9. Similarly, investigators' unintentional cues (e.g., body language, tone of voice) may negatively impact the reliability of eyewitness evidence. Psychology researchers have noted that such influences could be avoided if 'blind' identification procedures were employed (i.e., procedures conducted by investigators who do not know the identity of the actual suspect). However, blind procedures, which are used in science to prevent inadvertent contamination of research results, may be impractical for some jurisdictions to implement.
  72. ↑ Olsen, Christopher (2016). Acting Comedy. Routledge. pp. 98–100. ISBN   978-1-138-89141-8.
  73. ↑ Danesi, M (2006). "Kinesics". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 207–213. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01421-8. ISBN   978-0080448541.
  74. 1 2 Barfield, T (1997). The dictionary of anthropology. Illinois: Blackwell Publishing.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.