Chorthippus brunneus

Last updated

Chorthippus brunneus
Grasshopper April 2008-3.jpg
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Orthoptera
Suborder: Caelifera
Family: Acrididae
Genus: Chorthippus
Species:
C. brunneus
Binomial name
Chorthippus brunneus
(Thunberg, 1815) [1]
Synonyms
  • Gryllus brunneusThunberg, 1815
Close-Up of a Chorthippus brunneus

Chorthippus brunneus, also known as the common field grasshopper, is a species of grasshopper of the subfamily Gomphocerinae. [1] The species is common and widespread in the Western Palearctic, and the IUCN lists it as Least Concern. [1]

Contents

Appearance

C. brunneus are predominantly brown. [2] However, they show a large variation in colour and can also be black, green, purple, or white. [2] Wing patterns vary between individuals and can be mottled, striped, striped-mottled, or plain. [2] Both green and purple grasshoppers tend to have plain forewing patterns while black grasshoppers primarily have mottled forewing patterns. [2] Brown grasshoppers do not consistently have the same forewing pattern instead they have variable forewing patterns. [2]

At least two loci are responsible for pronotum color in C. brunneus. [3] Green alleles are dominant to all other colors while brown alleles are recessive to all other colors. [3] Wing pattern is determined by a separate locus than colour. [3] The plain forewing pattern is dominant and the striped and mottled forewing patterns are codominant. [3]

Habitat and range

C. brunneus are found in Europe, north Africa, and temperate Asia. [4] They prefer dry habitats. [5] They are present in higher numbers in heathland areas compared to agricultural areas. [6] This can be explained by the difference in sward height in the two areas. [6] C. brunneus prefer habitats with sward heights of 100 to 200 mm and fine leaved grass species. [6] In fact a positive correlation between C. brunneus and both Agrostis species and Festuca species exists. [6] Fine leaved grass species and taller sward heights occur more commonly in heathlands where less human alteration of the land occurs compared to agricultural sites. [6] Sward height also influences abundance. [6] A greater number of C. brunneus are found in taller swards although some scientific literature suggests C. brunneus thrives in wastelands. [6] Vertebrate grazing also influences C. brunneus density by directly influencing sward height. [7] Ungrazed areas have higher densities of C. brunneus than grazed areas. [7] Vertebrate grazing is thought to alter plant hormones two of which are known to effect fecundity, abscisic acid, and gibberellins. [7] Additionally grazing results in the production of proteinase inhibitors in plants and the alteration of nitrogen levels. [7] In areas that experience less vertebrate grazing C. brunneus have increased rates of development, higher adult weights, and increased fecundity. [7]

Diet

C. brunneus are herbivores and polyphagous. [6] They feed primarily on grasses. [6]

Reproduction

C. brunneus are univoltine. [4]

Mating

Males attract females by singing via stridulation. [8] An interested female will respond singing a similar-sounding song. [8] The male will respond to the female by singing again. [8] This can continue until copulation or the female becomes disinterested. [8] Although a female response to male song does not guarantee mating it does increase the likelihood of copulation. [8] Upon contact the male will produce a soft song and mount the female. [9]

Reproductive output

While the average weight of females does not differ between high and low-density population conditions reproductive output is greater in low-density conditions compared to high-density conditions. [10] Females in high-density conditions also experience a higher mortality rate. [10] In a study by Wall and Begon (1987) 10 of 29 females in high-density conditions died while no females died in the low-density conditions. [10] A positive correlation also exists between the number of eggs per pod and the length of a female's hind femur. [10] Females in high-density conditions produced only half of the eggs produced by females in low-density conditions. [10] Larger females in high-density conditions produce eggs at a faster rate than smaller females. [10] While smaller females in low-density groups produce eggs faster than larger females resulting in an equal reproductive output between small and large females. [10]

Hybridization

In northern Spain C. brunneus and C. jacobsi form a hybrid zone. [11] It has been suggested that the two species diverged during Pleistocene ice age. [11] Both have the same number of chromosomes (2n=17) with three pairs of long metacentric, four pairs of medium acrocentric, and one pair of short acrocentric chromosomes. [11] Using in situ hybridization an extra rDNA sequence is consistently found on the X chromosome in C. brunneus that is absent in C. jacobsi. [11] The additional rDNA is not expressed in either C. brunneus or the hybrids that possess the rDNA sequence. [11] C. brunneus and C. jacobsi can also be differentiated based on song and by the difference in number of stridulatory pegs located on the hind femur. [11]

Using a mark and recapture procedure, the lifetime dispersal of C. brunneus and C. jacobsi were estimated to be similar to other grasshopper species that form hybrid zones. [12] C. brunneus and C. jacobsi are dominant during different months. [13] C. brunneus are dominant in August while C. jacobsi are dominant in June and July. [13] Additionally C. brunneus are only found in valley habitats while C. jacobsi are found in both valley and mountain habitats [13] This suggests both seasonal and temporal isolation between the two species. [13]

C. brunneus, C. jacobsi, and hybrid females all show a preference for male C. brunneus and C. jacobsi songs over hybrid male songs. [14] Differences in song traits echeme, syllable, and phrase length have a small epistatic effect but cannot be fully explained by genetic factors. [15] Low genetic variation was found to occur between the three song characteristics in C. brunneus and C. jacobsi and no sex linkage was found. [15] Peg numbers on the stridulatory file, while different between the two species, are surprisingly not dependent on song characteristics. [15] Genetics cannot account for the difference in peg number. [15] Instead additive effects explain the phenotypic variation in both song characteristics and peg number between C. brunneus, C. jacobsi, and their hybrids. [15]

Meiosis

When C. brunneus was exposed to X-irradiation during the zygotene-early pachytene stages of meiosis, this treatment caused a significant increase in meiotic cell chiasma frequency. [16] Chiasma frequency was scored during the subsequent diplotene-diakinesis stages of meiosis.

Development

C. brunneus are hemimetabolous. [4] Females lay eggs over a 10-week period in the soil. [4] [17] Eggs hatch as early as April. [17] Hatchlings typically go through four nymphal stages before becoming adults. Adults can live into the late autumn. [17]

Eggs and hatchlings

C. brunneus lay eggs in a variety of habitats from chalk hills to sandy hills but most commonly lay their eggs in sandy, dry habitats. [18] In the lab, C. brunneus prefer dry and compact substrates composed of fine particles such as sand. They produce the largest number of eggs between 28-35 °C degrees. [18] In theory, smaller eggs should have higher mortality rates because of reduced provisions provided within the egg. [17] However researchers found that egg viability is greater in the southern populations where eggs are smaller. [17] This can be explained by higher overwintering temperatures. [17] Egg size is influenced by a number of factors. As maternal age increases so does egg size. At the beginning of the breeding season females lay smaller eggs compared to the end of the breeding season. [4] Eggs laid in the last part of the breeding season are smaller in size due to deteriorating maternal health. [4]

Research suggests that there is no correlation between stage of development and water uptake. [19] [20] While eggs can withstand a large amount of water loss they cannot survive complete desiccation. [19] [20] Therefore, it is not important at what point water is absorbed, it is only important that water is absorbed at some point. [19] [20]

A larger egg size generally results in a larger hatchling and adult size. [4] Eggs laid by C. brunneus from late August to early September are the heaviest, hatch the latest, and have heavier hatchlings. [4] While earlier hatchlings are initially smaller, earlier hatchlings achieve a larger body size than later hatchlings. [4] Maximum temperatures rather than minimum temperatures influence the weight of hatchlings unless the minimum temperature exceeds the tolerance limit. [17] In later hatchlings warmer weather and decreased food availability promotes more rapid development resulting in a smaller body size compared to earlier hatchlings. [4] The heaviest hatchlings come from colder habitats. Increased population density also results in decreased adult size as well as slower development. [21]

Diapause

C. brunneus overwinter via obligate egg diapause. [22] Research suggests that diapause can be broken regardless of the stage of development. [22] Eggs can be kept for up to a year at 5 °C and still hatch. [22] In the lab, diapause can be broken by keeping the eggs at 25 °C for two weeks before lowering the temperature to approximately 4 °C for several weeks. [22]

Additional instar

Two populations of C. brunneus have females that have an additional instar inserted between instar II and III termed instar IIa. [23] Morphological characteristics of instar IIa are a mixture of instars II and III. [23] Females are of an intermediate size and length between instars II and III. [23] Wing buds closely resemble the wing buds of instar II but have more venation than the typical wing buds of instar II. [23] Genitalia development is closer to the development of instar III development. [23] Additional instars have been found in other acridid species that display sexual dimorphism in which females are larger than males such as C. parallelus . [23] C. brunneus females on average are 3 to 4 times larger than males. [23] The occurrence of the additional instar most likely reflects the habitat the C. brunneus females occur. [23] Females with the additional instar have only been found to occur in the region of East Anglia in Britain. [23] The longer summers in East Anglia may facilitate earlier hatching and an increased growth rate permitting the inclusion of instar IIa allowing the females to reach a larger size. [23] Decreased availability of food may encourage rapid development also explaining the inclusion of an additional instar. [23]

Growth

Development rate is not affected by humidity but is affected by heat source. [10] C. brunneus reared with a radiant heat source take six to seven weeks less to reach their adult instar than those that are not. [10] Development is also quicker in nymphs reared in low-density populations. [10] Males and females weigh the same until the third instar where females outweigh the males. [10] Females take a longer time to develop as they have longer instars than males. [10] However, males develop more uniformly and live longer than females. [10] In England, northern populations of C. brunneus have faster development and shorter growth periods compared to southern populations. [17]

Song

C. brunneus produce song by moving stridulatory pegs against their elytra. [24] The normal calling song consists of 5-12 notes that range between 0.25 and 0.50 seconds in length. [9] Notes are followed by a 3-second period of rest. Males will repeat the song at intervals. [9] Males produce a rival song when they come into contact with other males. [25] C. brunneus males produce sounds during the pauses of the other males' song. [25] Notes in the rival song are produced three to four times faster than notes produced in the normal song. [25] In the normal song notes are produced every 1.5–2 seconds but in the rival song notes are produced every 0.35–0.57 seconds. [25] Courtship songs are produced after the male produces some notes from his normal song and fails to copulate. [25] Courtship songs in C. brunneus consist of softer notes similar to the normal song produced at higher frequencies. [25] After producing the song for a duration the male will attempt to copulate with the female. [25] If he is unsuccessful he will produce several short, loud notes before producing the courtship song again. [25] A receptive female will respond to the male's song leading to the alteration of song between her and the male. [25] This is called the attraction song. [25] Male C. brunneus not only produce several different types of calls, they also show variation in characteristics of the same song. [9] Stabilizing selection has acted on male C. brunneus song. [9] Males with intermediate song characteristics are most successful while males with extreme characteristics are the least successful in attracting a mate. [9] Song production is sensitive to the environment. [9]

Pollution

C. brunneus are used as a bioindicators for heavy metal pollution. [26] They are commonly found living in habitats that are polluted with heavy metals such as Szopienice and Olkusz in Poland. [26] Some sites have heavy metal concentrations as high as 124.3±15.9 mg•kg-1. [27] Individuals can have heavy metal concentrations as larger as 21.25 mg•kg-1. [27] Exposure to heavy metal concentrations alters catalytic ability of enzymes. [26] [27] [28] Individuals from heavily polluted sites have increased glutathione concentrations and decreased glutathione S-transferase activity. [26] In the lab, individuals exposed to zinc during diapause have lower glutathione concentrations. [28] Dimethoate exposure enhances the effect of heavy metal exposure decreasing glutathione concentrations and reducing acetylcholinesterase activity by almost 50%. [27] Exposure to dimethoate also decreases glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and carboxylesterases activity. [27] Because C. brunneus in non polluted reference sites do not experience the same decrease in enzyme activities, researchers have suggested that the decreased enzyme activities can be contributed to the tradeoff associated with adapting to living in heavily polluted habitats. [27] [28] Individuals are forced to allocate more energy towards neutralizing harmful effects of heavy metals instead of allocating the energy to growth and development. [27] [28]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grasshopper</span> Common name for a group of insects

Grasshoppers are a group of insects belonging to the suborder Caelifera. They are among what is possibly the most ancient living group of chewing herbivorous insects, dating back to the early Triassic around 250 million years ago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red locust</span> Species of grasshopper

The red locust is a large grasshopper species found in sub-Saharan Africa. Its name refers to the colour of its hind wings. It is sometimes called the criquet nomade in French, due to its nomadic movements in the dry season. When it forms swarms, it is described as a locust.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roesel's bush-cricket</span> Species of cricket-like animal

Roesel's bush-cricket, Roeseliana roeselii is a European bush-cricket, named after August Johann Rösel von Rosenhof, a German entomologist.

Chorthippus jutlandica, the Jutland bow-winged grasshopper, is a species of grasshopper in the subfamily Gomphocerinae. It is endemic to sparsely vegetated coastal sand dunes in an area covering only 87 km2 (34 sq mi) between Blåvandshuk and Hvide Sande in western Jutland, Denmark, but it is common and not considered to be under any threat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wart-biter</span> Species of insect

The wart-biter is a bush-cricket in the family Tettigoniidae. Its common and scientific names derive from the eighteenth-century Swedish practice of allowing the crickets to nibble at warts to remove them.

<i>Saga pedo</i> Species of cricket-like animal

Saga pedo is a species of wingless bush cricket from the southern half of Europe and western and central Asia. This brown or green bush cricket typically has a total length, from the head to the tip of the ovipositor, of up to 10.5 cm (4.1 in), but exceptionally it may reach 12 cm (4.7 in), which makes it one of the largest European insects and one of the world's largest Orthoptera. The head-and-body alone typically is 5–7 cm (2.0–2.8 in) long in adults, but may reach up to 7.8 cm (3.1 in).

Schayera baiulus is a species of grasshopper in the family of the Acrididae. The species is endemic to the Northern Region of Tasmania in Australia. The species is extremely rare and critically endangered, with only five confirmed specimens ever found.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senegalese grasshopper</span> Species of grasshopper

The Senegalese grasshopper is a medium-sized grasshopper species found in the Sahel region of Africa, the Canary Islands, Cape Verde Islands, and West Asia. Although not called a locust in English, this species shows gregarious behaviour and some morphological change on crowding. In many parts of the Sahel, this species may cause greater year-on-year crop damage than better-known locusts, attacking crops such as the pearl millet.

<i>Melanoplus bivittatus</i> Species of grasshopper

Melanoplus bivittatus, the two-striped grasshopper, is a poikilothermic species of grasshopper belonging to the genus Melanoplus. It is commonly found in North America, with high quantities inhabiting Canadian prairies and farmland.

<i>Melanoplus femurrubrum</i> Species of grasshopper

Melanoplus femurrubrum, the red-legged grasshopper, is a species of grasshopper belonging to the genus Melanoplus. It is one of the most common grasshoppers found in Mexico, the United States, and Canada. This grasshopper is frequently used as a model organism in scientific studies, due to their abundance throughout North America and behavioral response to changes in climate.

<i>Brachaspis robustus</i> Species of grasshopper

Brachaspis robustus is a nationally endangered species of grasshopper endemic to the Mackenzie Basin of the South Island of New Zealand. The genus Brachaspis is endemic to the South Island of New Zealand. Although a grasshopper, it is a poor jumper, relying on camouflage to hide from predators. It is threatened by introduced mammals such as stoats, hedgehogs, and rats.

<i>Sigaus</i> Genus of grasshoppers

Sigaus is a genus of grasshoppers in the tribe Catantopini that is endemic to New Zealand. All but one Sigaus species is endemic to the South Island: Sigaus piliferus is the only North Island representative and is the type species. Most species in this genus are restricted to alpine habitats. All are wingless and make no sounds.

<i>Taeniopoda eques</i> Species of grasshopper

Taeniopoda eques, the western horse lubber grasshopper, is a relatively large grasshopper species of the family Romaleidae found in arid and semi-arid parts of southwestern United States to central and southwestern Mexico. Most populations are identifiable by their shiny black bodies with contrasting yellow markings, but some adults are mostly yellowish, orangish or greenish. The species is unique in using its black coloration to thermoregulate and in being chemically defended. The aposematic coloration warns vertebrate predators of its unpalatability and allows the grasshopper to roost conspicuously upon shrubs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rufous grasshopper</span> Species of grasshopper

The rufous grasshopper is a species of grasshopper. It is a medium-sized, broad, brown, short-horned grasshopper with clubbed antennae that are tipped with a conspicuous white or pale colour. It is fairly large, averaging 14 to 22 mm in length. It is of the subfamily Gomphocerinae in the family Acrididae, the predominant family of grasshoppers. This species is present in most of Europe, in the eastern Palearctic realm, and in the Near East. It can be encountered from late July through mid-December, usually in dry or slightly moist habitats. The environments in which it typically resides include dry grassland on calcareous soils, sheltered valleys with scrub, and the open borders of forests. It feeds on grasses and various herbaceous plants. It is known for its distinctive courtship song and accompanying display.

<i>Chorthippus albomarginatus</i> Species of grasshopper

Chorthippus albomarginatus, the lesser marsh grasshopper, is a common grasshopper of European grassland both damp-marshy and dry, including salt-marsh and coastal habitats.

<i>Schistocerca americana</i> Species of grasshopper

Schistocerca americana is a species of grasshopper in the family Acrididae known commonly as the American grasshopper and American bird grasshopper. It is native to North America, where it occurs in the eastern United States, Mexico, and the Bahamas. Occasional, localized outbreaks of this grasshopper occur, and it is often referred to as a locust, though it lacks the true swarming form of its congener, the desert locust.

Cornops aquaticum is a semiaquatic species of grasshopper native to the Neotropics, from southern Mexico south to central Argentina and Uruguay. It feeds and breeds exclusively on members of the aquatic plant family Pontederiaceae, especially water hyacinth, and is being investigated as a possible biological pest control agent for the water hyacinth in countries where that plant is invasive.

<i>Eyprepocnemis plorans</i> Species of grasshopper

Eyprepocnemis plorans, the lamenting grasshopper, is a species of insect in the family Acrididae. It is the type species of the genus Eyprepocnemis, and is found in Africa, parts of the Middle East, and southern Europe. It typically inhabits wetlands and other moist habitats.

<i>Brachaspis nivalis</i> Species of insect

Brachaspis nivalis, is an alpine short-horned grasshopper, endemic to the South Island of New Zealand. Brachaspis nivalis is brachypterous and flightless, therefore they travel by hopping. They bask during the day so need open habitat.

<i>Cyrtacanthacris aeruginosa</i> Species of grasshopper

Cyrtacanthacris aeruginosa or simply, green tree locust, is a large species of grasshopper that can be found in the grasslands of Africa. They pertain to the genus Cyrtacanthacris and are composed by three subspecies, C. a. aeruginosa, C. a. flavescens and C. a. goldingi, all three of them are monophyletic. The specie is univoltine, that is, it only produces one brood of offspring per year, furthermore it also experiences egg diapause, meaning that the eggs have a phase of suspended or arrested growth. In terms of overwintering strategy, Aeruginosa adults mate and then the female lay the eggs and die before the dry season, the eggs stay in diapause for 7 months and take 45–67 days to incubate.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Bushell, M. & Hochkirch, A. (2014). "Chorthippus brunneus". The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species . IUCN. 2014: e.T16084483A46176937. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-1.RLTS.T16084483A46176937.en . Retrieved 13 January 2018.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Gill, P. (1979). "Colour-pattern variation in relation to habitat in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus (Thunberg)". Ecological Entomology. 4 (3): 249–257. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1979.tb00582.x.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Gill, P. (2008). "The genetics of colour-patterns in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 16 (3): 243–259. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb01850.x.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cherrill, A. (2002). "Relationship between oviposition date, hatch date, and offspring size in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus". Ecological Entomology. 27 (5): 521–528. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00444.x .
  5. Begon, M. (1983). "Grasshopper populations and weather: the effects of isolation on Chorthippus brunneus". Ecological Entomology. 8 (4): 331–339. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1983.tb00516.x.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Gardiner, T.; Pye, M.; Field, R. & Hill, J. (2002). "The influence of sward height and vegetation composition in determining the habitat preferences of three Chorthippus species (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Chelmsford, Essex, UK". Journal of Orthoptera Research. 11 (2): 207–213. doi: 10.1665/1082-6467(2002)011[0207:tiosha]2.0.co;2 .
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Grayson, F. W. L. & Hassall, M. (1985). "Effects of rabbit grazing on population variables of Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera)". Oikos. 44 (1): 27–34. doi:10.2307/3544039.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Charalambous, M.; Butlin, R. K. & Hewitt, G. M. (1994). "Genetic variation in male song and female song preference in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae)". Animal Behaviour. 47 (2): 399–411. doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1054.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Butlin, R. K.; Hewitt, G. M. & Webb, S. F. (1985). "Sexual selection for intermediate optimum in Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae)". Animal Behaviour. 33 (4): 1281–1292. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80188-3.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Wall, R. & Begon, M. (1987). "Population density, phenotype and reproductive output in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus". Ecological Entomology. 12 (3): 331–339. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1987.tb01012.x.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bridle, J. R.; de la Torre, J.; Bella, J. L.; Butlin, R. K. & Gosalvez, J. (2002). "Low levels of chromosomal differentiation between the grasshoppers Chorthippus brunneus and Chorthippus jacobsi (Orthoptera; Acrididae) in northern Spain". Genetica. 114 (2): 121–127. doi:10.1023/A:1015185122507.
  12. Bailey, R. I.; Lineham, M. E.; Thomas, C. D. & Butlin, R. K. (2004). "Measuring dispersal and detecting departures from a random walk model in a grasshopper hybrid zone". Ecological Entomology. 28 (2): 129–138. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00504.x.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Bailey, R. I.; Thomas, C. D. & Butlin, R. K. (2004). "Premating barriers to gene exchange and their implications for the structure of a mosaic hybrid zone between Chorthippus brunneus and C. jacobsi (Orthoptera: Acrididae)". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 17 (1): 108–119. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00648.x.
  14. Bridle, J. R.; Saldamando, C. I.; Koning, W. & Butlin, R. K. (2006). "Assortative preferences and discrimination by females against hybrid male song in the grasshoppers Chorthippus brunneus and Chorthippus jacobsi (Orthoptera: Acrididae)". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 19 (4): 1248–1256. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01080.x . PMID   16780525.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Saldamando, C. I.; Miyaguchi, S.; Tatsuta, H.; Kishino, H.; Bridle, J. R. & Butlin, R. K. (2005). "Inheritance of song and stridulatory peg number divergence between Chorthippus brunneus and C. jacobsi, two naturally hybridizing grasshopper species (Orthoptera: Acrididae)". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 18 (3): 703–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00838.x . PMID   15842499.
  16. Westerman M (1971). "The effect of x-irradiation on chiasma frequency in Chorthippus brunneus". Heredity. 27 (1): 83–91. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1971.73 . PMID   5289295.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Telfer, M. G. & Hassall, M. (1999). "Ecotypic differentiation in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus: life history varies in relation to climate". Oecologia. 121 (2): 245–254. doi:10.1007/s004420050926.
  18. 1 2 Choudhuri, J. C. B. (1958). "Experimental studies on the choice of oviposition sites by two species of Chorthippus (Orthoptera: Acrididae)". Journal of Animal Ecology. 27 (2): 201–216. doi:10.2307/2239.
  19. 1 2 3 Moriarty, F. (1969). "Egg diapause and water absorption in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus". Journal of Insect Physiology. 15 (11): 2069–2074. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(69)90074-2.
  20. 1 2 3 Moriarty, F. (1969). "Water uptake and embryonic development in eggs of Chorthippus brunneus Thunberg (Saltatoria: Acrididae)". Journal of Experimental Biology. 50: 327–333. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80185-3.
  21. Wall, R.; Begon, M. (1987). "Individual variation and the effects of population density in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus". Oikos. 49 (3): 15–27. doi:10.2307/3565550.
  22. 1 2 3 4 Moriarty, F. (1969). "The laboratory breeding and embryonic development of Chorthippus brunneus Thunberg (Orthoptera: Acrididae)". Ecological Entomology. 44: 25–34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1969.tb00815.x.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Hassall, M. & Grayson, F. W. L. (1987). "The occurrence of an additional instar in the development of Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Gomphocerinae)". Journal of Natural History. 21 (2): 329–337. doi:10.1080/00222938700771051.
  24. Ritchie, M. G. (1990). "Are differences in song responsible for assortative mating between subspecies of the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae)?". Animal Behaviour. 39 (4): 685–691. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80379-3.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Perdeck, A. C. (1958). "The isolating value of specific song patterns in two sibling species of grasshoppers (Chorthippus brunneus Thunb. and C. biguttulus L.)". Behaviour. 12: 1–75. doi:10.1163/156853957x00074.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Augustyniak, M.; Babczynska, A. & Augustyniak, M. (2009). "Does the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus adapt to metal polluted habitats? A study of glutathione-dependent enzymes in grasshopper nymphs". Insect Science. 16 (1): 33–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2009.00251.x .
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Augustyniak, M.; Babczynska, A.; Migula, P.; Wilczek, G.; Laszczyca, P.; Kafel, A. & Augustyniak, M. (2005). "Effects of dimethoate and heavy metals on metabolic responses in a grasshopper (Chorthippus brunneus) from a heavy metals pollution gradient". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C. 141 (4): 412–419. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2005.09.007.
  28. 1 2 3 4 Augustyniak, M.; Babczynska, A. & Augustyniak, M. (2011). "Oxidative stress in newly hatched Chorthippus brunneus – the effects of zinc treatment during diapause, depending on the female's age and its origins". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C. 154 (3): 172–179. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2011.05.004.