| Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Argued November 9, 1992 Decided March 24, 1993 | |
| Full case name | City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network |
| Citations | 507 U.S. 410 ( more ) 113 S. Ct. 1505; 123 L. Ed. 2d 99; 1993 U.S. LEXIS 2401 |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Holding | |
| A ban by the city of Cincinnati on the distribution of commercial material via news racks violated the First Amendment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Stevens, joined by Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter |
| Concurrence | Blackmun |
| Dissent | Rehnquist, joined by White, Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. I | |
Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc., 507 U.S. 410 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a ban by the city of Cincinnati on the distribution of commercial material via news racks violated the First Amendment. [1]
| | This article related to a case of the Supreme Court of the United States of the Rehnquist Court is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |