Democratic experimentalism

Last updated

Democratic experimentalism is an interpretation of democracy that seeks to combine certain democratic concepts with a practice of thought and action. [1] It denotes varied pragmatic perspectives in legal theory, political science, political theory, and sociology. [2] It is considered a new paradigm of institutional thinking about democracy and law that conceives different roles for legal actors. [3]

Contents

Origin

Some[ who? ] trace the origin of democratic experimentalism to John Dewey's pragmatism. It is said[ by whom? ] that his thoughts provided the philosophical backdrop to the concept's proposals. [4] Dewey himself introduced the term “democratic experimentalism” around 1927. His conceptualization was based on the idea that knowledge is rooted in experiences that emerge from moments of crises. [5] Later, the term cropped up in German politics and was often quoted by Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, who argued that the concept opposes the normative postulates promising certainty and stability. [5] As the standard bearer of the Christian Democratic Party, he popularized the concept by consistently attacking it during the 1957 German election campaign. [6] Through the slogan, Keine Experimente (No Experiments), he argued that the successes of postwar Germany should not be risked by the reform plans that other parties proposed. [6]

Democratic experimentalism was later developed by scholars such as Charles Sabel, Michael Dorf, and Joshua Cohen. [7] These scholars explained the flaws of the conception of democracy as command and control. They argued that democratic processes in this setting are part of the problem, calling for experimentation so that it becomes part of the solution. [7]

Concept

It is argued[ by whom? ] that democracy is linked to political autonomy, which entails "the freedom to conduct and participate in political experiments. [8] Due to the structural complexity and the unpredictable dynamics of modern society, processes are understood as experiments in democratic experimentalism. [9] For some thinkers[ who? ], these experiments are variations of scientific experimentalism, although more pragmatic. [9] In this case, John Weber maintained that although processes may be relaxed, trying things should still be based on ethics and public policy.

According to Roberto Frega, "democratic experimentalism provides not only a framework for rethinking democracy but also "a set of theoretical insights to explain why democracy correlates positively with social innovation." [10] Frega maintained that its orientation toward methods of production control and the testing of new solutions to existing problems can lead to reforms. [10] This can be demonstrated in the capability to observe how and in what conditions the various publics engage or disengage in processes that seek to address public problems. [11] Frega subscribed to the pragmatist notion that policy interventions are types of field experiments. As experiments can generate learning, they contribute to the solution of complex technical problems and also empower citizens to challenge contested or dominant views in society. [2]

Applications

When applied to the courts, democratic experimentalism is demonstrated in the way judicial review becomes an evaluation of the admissibility of the reasons private and political actors give for their decisions, including the respect accorded to their decisions. [12] The concept is said to help the courts avoid the dogmatic and authoritarian legalism. [13] Decisions informed by democratic experimentalism is said to address the ambiguities and empirical difficulties of cases. [13]

Institutional theorists[ who? ] cite the incidence of social cooperation in all kinds of economic transactions. In democratic experimentalism, institutions can function as creators of circumstances that promote cooperation. [14] This intersection is said to demonstrate the extension of the normative core of democracy to the functioning of economic institutions. [14] From Adenauer's critique more than half a century ago, recent observers underscore the importance of democratic experimentalism, citing that it has created a new mode of experimentalist governance. [15] This is supported by a recognition that some type of experimentality is already part of modern society. [15]

Critique

Some theorists[ who? ] outline key challenges to democratic experimentalism. These include the difficulty in measuring success as well as the institutional will and the capabilities of public, private actors, and social movements to complete undergo benchmarking, and agree on the need for best practices, among others. [16] A critique of the experimentalist judicial review cite several points and these are:

Related Research Articles

Deliberative democracy or discursive democracy is a form of democracy in which deliberation is central to decision-making. Deliberative democracy seeks quality over quantity by limiting decision-makers to a smaller but more representative sample of the population that is given the time and resources to focus on one issue.

The international community is a term used in geopolitics and international relations to refer to a broad group of people and governments of the world.

Critical legal studies (CLS) is a school of critical theory that developed in the United States during the 1970s. CLS adherents claim that laws are devised to maintain the status quo of society and thereby codify its biases against marginalized groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chantal Mouffe</span> Belgian post-marxist political theorist

Chantal Mouffe is a Belgian political theorist, formerly teaching at University of Westminster.

Arend d'Angremond Lijphart is a Dutch-American political scientist specializing in comparative politics, elections and voting systems, democratic institutions, and ethnicity and politics. He is Research Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of California, San Diego. He is influential for his work on consociational democracy and his contribution to the new Institutionalism in political science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roberto Mangabeira Unger</span> Brazilian philosopher and politician

Roberto Mangabeira Unger is a Brazilian philosopher, jurist and politician. His work is in the tradition of classical social theory and pragmatism, and is developed across many fields including legal theory, philosophy and religion, social and political theory, progressive alternatives, and economics. In natural philosophy he is known for The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time. In social theory he is known for Politics: A Work in Constructive Social Theory. In legal theory he was associated with the Critical Legal Studies movement, which helped disrupt the methodological consensus in American law schools. His political activity helped the transition to democracy in Brazil in the aftermath of the military regime, and culminated with his appointment as Brazil's Minister of Strategic Affairs in 2007 and again in 2015. His work is seen to offer a vision of humanity and a program to empower individuals and change institutions.

Experimentalism is the philosophical belief that the way to truth is through experiments and empiricism. It is also associated with instrumentalism, the belief that truth should be evaluated based upon its demonstrated usefulness. Experimentalism is considered a theory of knowledge that emphasizes direct action and scientific control as well as methods and consequences.

Formative contexts are the institutional and imaginative arrangements that shape a society's conflicts and resolutions. They are the structures that limit both the practice and the imaginative possibilities in a socio-political order, and in doing so shape the routines of conflict over social, political and economic resources that govern access to labor, loyalty, and social station, e.g. government power, economic capital, technological expertise, etc. In a formative context, the institutions structure conflict over government power and capital allocation, whereas the imaginative framework shapes the preconceptions about possible forms of human interaction. Through this, a formative context further creates and sustains a set of roles and ranks, which mold conflict over the mastery of resources and the shaping of the ideas of social possibilities, identities and interests. The formative context of the Western democracies, for example, include the organization of production through managers and laborers, a set of laws administering capital, a state in relation to the citizen, and a social division of labor.

Radical democracy is a type of democracy that advocates the radical extension of equality and liberty. Radical democracy is concerned with a radical extension of equality and freedom, following the idea that democracy is an unfinished, inclusive, continuous and reflexive process.

Social democracy is a political, social, and economic philosophy within socialism that supports political and economic democracy and supports a gradualist, reformist and democratic approach towards achieving socialism, usually under a social liberal framework. In practice, social democracy takes a form of socially managed welfare capitalism, achieved with partial public ownership, economic interventionism, and policies promoting social equality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military sociology</span> Subfield within sociology which studies the military as a social group

Military sociology is a subfield within sociology. It corresponds closely to C. Wright Mills's summons to connect the individual world to broader social structures. Military sociology aims toward the systematic study of the military as a social group rather than as a military organization. This highly specialized sub-discipline examines issues related to service personnel as a distinct group with coerced collective action based on shared interests linked to survival in vocation and combat, with purposes and values that are more defined and narrow than within civil society. Military sociology also concerns civil-military relations and interactions between other groups or governmental agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patricia M. Shields</span> Political scientist

Patricia M. Shields is a Regents' Professor in the Political Science Department at Texas State University. Since 2001 she has been Editor-in-Chief of the international and interdisciplinary journal Armed Forces & Society. She is also a Contributing Editor to Parameters: The US Army War College Quarterly and the Section Editor of the Military and Society section to the Handbook of Military Sciences. Shields is notable for her publications focusing on research methods, civil military relations, gender issues, pragmatism in public administration, peace studies, and the contributions of Jane Addams to public administration and peace theory. She received a BA in Economics from the University of Maryland - College Park, an MA in Economics and a PhD in Public Administration from The Ohio State University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pragmatic ethics</span> Theory of normative philosophical ethics and meta-ethics

Pragmatic ethics is a theory of normative philosophical ethics and meta-ethics. Ethical pragmatists such as John Dewey believe that some societies have progressed morally in much the way they have attained progress in science. Scientists can pursue inquiry into the truth of a hypothesis and accept the hypothesis, in the sense that they act as though the hypothesis were true; nonetheless, they think that future generations can advance science, and thus future generations can refine or replace their accepted hypotheses. Similarly, ethical pragmatists think that norms, principles, and moral criteria are likely to be improved as a result of inquiry.

Empowered democracy is a form of social-democratic arrangements developed by Brazilian philosopher and politician Roberto Mangabeira Unger, who first published his theories in 1987. Theorized in response to the repressiveness and rigidity of contemporary liberal democratic society, the theory of empowered democracy envisions a more open and more plastic set of social institutions through which individuals and groups can interact, propose change, and effectively empower themselves to transform social, economic, and political structures. The key strategy is to combine freedom of commerce and governance at the local level with the ability of political parties at the central level to promote radical social experiments that would bring about decisive change in social and political institutions.

Political ethics is the practice of making moral judgments about political action and political agents. It covers two areas: the ethics of process, which covers public officials and their methods, and the ethics of policy, which concerns judgments surrounding policies and laws.

Workplace democracy is the application of democracy in various forms to the workplace, such as voting systems, debates, democratic structuring, due process, adversarial process, and systems of appeal. It can be implemented in a variety of ways, depending on the size, culture, and other variables of an organization.

<i>Democracy Realized</i> 1998 book by Roberto Mangabeira Unger

Democracy Realized: The Progressive Alternative is a 1998 book by philosopher and politician Roberto Mangabeira Unger. In the book, Unger sets forth a program of "democratic experimentalism" that challenges and defies the neoliberal consensus that there are few alternatives for the progressive reform of democratic and market structures.

<i>The Self Awakened</i>

The Self Awakened: Pragmatism Unbound is a 2007 book by philosopher and politician Roberto Mangabeira Unger. In the book, Unger sets forth a theory of human nature, a philosophical view of time, nature and reality, and a proposal for changes to social and political institutions so that they best nourish the context-transcending quality that Unger sees at the core of human existence. Written in a prophetic and poetic manner that drew comparison with the work of Whitman and Emerson, and delving into issues of humankind's existential predicament in a manner that one critic found evocative of Sartre, The Self Awakened also serves as a summation of many of the core principles of Unger's work.

Judicial populism or juridical populism is a phenomenon where the judgments and actions of the courts are driven by the perception of the masses or certain groups. The term, which some refer to as popular constitutionalism, has been described as a reaction to the perceived elitist bias in the legal system.

Davide Tarizzo (1966) is an Italian philosopher and professor, notable for his academic research and works on political theory and Post-Kantian European philosophy, with particular attention to biopolitics, psychoanalysis(Freud, Lacan), and French theory. He currently serves as professor of moral philosophy at the University of Salerno.

References

  1. ↑ Unger, Roberto Mangabeira (2000). Democracy Realized: The Progressive Alternative. London: Verso. p. 5. ISBN   1-85984-009-4.
  2. 1 2 Frega, Roberto (2019). Pragmatism and the Wide View of Democracy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 275, 282. ISBN   978-3-030-18560-2.
  3. ↑ García, Helena Alviar; Klare, Karl; Williams, Lucy A. (2015). Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries. Oxon: Routledge. p. 237. ISBN   978-1-317-96443-8.
  4. ↑ Butler, Brian E. (2013). Democratic Experimentalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi. p. 55. ISBN   978-90-420-3660-4.
  5. 1 2 Bogusz, Tanja (24 May 2022). Experimentalism and Sociology: From Crisis to Experience (2022 ed.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. p. 1. ISBN   978-3-030-92477-5.
  6. 1 2 Hourdequin, Marion; Havlick, David G. (2016). Restoring Layered Landscapes: History, Ecology, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 79. ISBN   978-0-19-024032-5.
  7. 1 2 Bohman, James (December 2012). "Democratic experimentalism: From Self-Legislation to Self-Determination". Contemporary Pragmatism. 9 (2): 273–285. doi:10.1163/18758185-90000241.
  8. ↑ Miller, Russell (2007). Annual of German and European Law: Volume II and III. New York: Berghahn Books. p. 7. ISBN   978-1-78920-603-6.
  9. 1 2 Butler, Brian E. (2013). Democratic Experimentalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi. p. 163. ISBN   978-94-012-0926-7.
  10. 1 2 Zamora, Justo Serrano (2021). Democratization and Struggles Against Injustice: A Pragmatist Approach to the Epistemic Practices of Social Movements. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 126. ISBN   978-1-5381-5154-9.
  11. ↑ Howaldt, Jürgen; Kaletka, Christoph (2023). Encyclopedia of Social Innovation. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 113. ISBN   978-1-80037-335-8.
  12. ↑ Hubbs, Graham; Lind, Douglas (2013). Pragmatism, Law, and Language. Oxon, UK: Routledge. p. 218. ISBN   978-0-415-85730-7.
  13. 1 2 Butler, Brian E. (2017). The Democratic Constitution: Experimentalism and Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 203. ISBN   978-0-226-47450-2.
  14. 1 2 Frega, Roberto (2019). Pragmatism and the Wide View of Democracy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. p. 344. ISBN   978-3-030-18560-2.
  15. 1 2 Mica, Adriana; Pawlak, Mikołaj; Horolets, Anna; Kubicki, Paweł (2023). Routledge International Handbook of Failure. New York: Taylor & Francis. ISBN   978-1-000-77568-6.
  16. ↑ García, Helena Alviar; Klare, Karl; Williams, Lucy A. (2014). Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 253. ISBN   978-1-317-96443-8.
  17. ↑ García, Helena Alviar; Klare, Karl; Williams, Lucy A. (2014). Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries. Oxon: Routledge. p. 247. ISBN   978-0-415-70564-6.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.