0.900–1.000 0.800–0.899 0.700–0.799 | 0.600–0.699 0.500–0.599 0.400–0.499 | 0.300–0.399 0.200–0.299 0.100–0.199 | 0.000–0.099 No data |
Democracy in Asia can be comparatively assessed [1] according to various definitions of democracy. [2] According to the V-Dem Democracy indices, the Asian countries with the highest democracy scores in year 2023 were Taiwan, Japan, Cyprus, Israel, and South Korea, meanwhile the Asian countries with lowest democracy scores in 2023 are Saudi Arabia, China and Afghanistan. [3] Democratic backsliding can be observed in parts of Asia. [4] The V-Dem Democracy Report identified for the year 2023 East Timor as a case of stand-alone democratization and Thailand and Maldives as cases of U-Turn democratization. [5]
The table below shows Asian countries scored on V-Dem Democracy indices in 2024. [5] [3] [6]
Country | Democracy Indices | Democracy Component Indices | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electoral | Liberal | Liberal | Egalitarian | Participatory | Deliberative | |
Taiwan | 0.823 | 0.722 | 0.878 | 0.913 | 0.751 | 0.897 |
Japan | 0.818 | 0.731 | 0.901 | 0.927 | 0.565 | 0.9 |
Cyprus | 0.774 | 0.636 | 0.817 | 0.869 | 0.574 | 0.837 |
Israel | 0.723 | 0.634 | 0.889 | 0.762 | 0.603 | 0.759 |
South Korea | 0.703 | 0.604 | 0.863 | 0.863 | 0.61 | 0.844 |
East Timor | 0.698 | 0.507 | 0.692 | 0.555 | 0.554 | 0.72 |
Nepal | 0.681 | 0.523 | 0.742 | 0.592 | 0.614 | 0.555 |
Armenia | 0.634 | 0.422 | 0.611 | 0.811 | 0.442 | 0.69 |
Georgia | 0.604 | 0.473 | 0.761 | 0.784 | 0.542 | 0.803 |
Maldives | 0.599 | 0.453 | 0.728 | 0.61 | 0.49 | 0.782 |
Sri Lanka | 0.58 | 0.421 | 0.688 | 0.625 | 0.549 | 0.61 |
Indonesia | 0.541 | 0.36 | 0.604 | 0.445 | 0.595 | 0.816 |
Bhutan | 0.527 | 0.445 | 0.819 | 0.831 | 0.558 | 0.921 |
Mongolia | 0.527 | 0.405 | 0.732 | 0.607 | 0.398 | 0.769 |
Malaysia | 0.506 | 0.359 | 0.655 | 0.726 | 0.533 | 0.662 |
Papua New Guinea | 0.475 | 0.383 | 0.761 | 0.493 | 0.527 | 0.524 |
Philippines | 0.43 | 0.287 | 0.581 | 0.334 | 0.567 | 0.749 |
Singapore | 0.403 | 0.331 | 0.735 | 0.81 | 0.134 | 0.738 |
India | 0.377 | 0.275 | 0.621 | 0.429 | 0.507 | 0.612 |
Iraq | 0.367 | 0.21 | 0.452 | 0.449 | 0.462 | 0.589 |
Lebanon | 0.364 | 0.237 | 0.529 | 0.503 | 0.472 | 0.667 |
Kyrgyzstan | 0.358 | 0.199 | 0.432 | 0.582 | 0.392 | 0.367 |
Pakistan | 0.344 | 0.212 | 0.484 | 0.243 | 0.545 | 0.531 |
Kuwait | 0.333 | 0.313 | 0.8 | 0.58 | 0.186 | 0.66 |
Thailand | 0.288 | 0.228 | 0.598 | 0.472 | 0.388 | 0.341 |
Turkey | 0.287 | 0.113 | 0.245 | 0.53 | 0.416 | 0.195 |
Kazakhstan | 0.284 | 0.144 | 0.345 | 0.597 | 0.299 | 0.446 |
Jordan | 0.256 | 0.253 | 0.729 | 0.566 | 0.284 | 0.692 |
Palestine (West Bank) | 0.254 | 0.138 | 0.359 | 0.623 | 0.422 | 0.388 |
Bangladesh | 0.253 | 0.096 | 0.219 | 0.243 | 0.303 | 0.298 |
Uzbekistan | 0.215 | 0.081 | 0.2 | 0.449 | 0.173 | 0.445 |
Cambodia | 0.198 | 0.057 | 0.13 | 0.219 | 0.371 | 0.187 |
Russia | 0.19 | 0.062 | 0.151 | 0.396 | 0.379 | 0.2 |
Azerbaijan | 0.188 | 0.064 | 0.162 | 0.37 | 0.119 | 0.123 |
Oman | 0.17 | 0.137 | 0.436 | 0.58 | 0.388 | 0.203 |
Tajikistan | 0.168 | 0.041 | 0.091 | 0.198 | 0.157 | 0.149 |
Iran | 0.156 | 0.082 | 0.246 | 0.5 | 0.079 | 0.186 |
Hong Kong | 0.154 | 0.124 | 0.401 | 0.721 | 0.131 | 0.17 |
Turkmenistan | 0.15 | 0.036 | 0.083 | 0.288 | 0.065 | 0.043 |
Vietnam | 0.149 | 0.114 | 0.372 | 0.662 | 0.563 | 0.613 |
Syria | 0.146 | 0.054 | 0.153 | 0.167 | 0.137 | 0.056 |
Palestine (Gaza Strip) | 0.136 | 0.07 | 0.219 | 0.582 | 0.357 | 0.202 |
Laos | 0.132 | 0.095 | 0.313 | 0.44 | 0.393 | 0.181 |
Yemen | 0.13 | 0.048 | 0.14 | 0.108 | 0.217 | 0.181 |
Bahrain | 0.129 | 0.054 | 0.165 | 0.391 | 0.122 | 0.209 |
United Arab Emirates | 0.102 | 0.078 | 0.27 | 0.486 | 0.095 | 0.285 |
Qatar | 0.087 | 0.085 | 0.306 | 0.382 | 0.041 | 0.389 |
North Korea | 0.084 | 0.015 | 0.036 | 0.317 | 0.153 | 0.036 |
Myanmar | 0.081 | 0.016 | 0.044 | 0.207 | 0.314 | 0.221 |
Afghanistan | 0.075 | 0.03 | 0.101 | 0.112 | 0.03 | 0.093 |
China | 0.074 | 0.037 | 0.129 | 0.315 | 0.124 | 0.382 |
Saudi Arabia | 0.015 | 0.046 | 0.184 | 0.446 | 0.087 | 0.249 |
The politics of South Korea take place in the framework of a presidential representative democratic republic, whereby the president is the head of state, and of a multi-party system. To ensure a separation of powers, the Republic of Korea Government is made up of three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. The government exercises executive power and legislative power is vested in both the government and the National Assembly. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature and comprises a Supreme Court, appellate courts, and a Constitutional Court.
The state of Democracy in Middle East and North Africa can be comparatively assessed according to various definitions of democracy. De jure democracies in the Middle East and North Africa are according to system of government:
The Polity data series is a data series in political science research. Along with the V-Dem Democracy indices project and Democracy Index, Polity is among prominent datasets that measure democracy and autocracy.
Freedom in the World is a yearly survey and report by the U.S.-based non-governmental organization Freedom House that measures the degree of civil liberties and political rights in every nation and significant related and disputed territories around the world.
The Democracy Index published by the Economist Group is an index measuring the quality of democracy across the world. This quantitative and comparative assessment is centrally concerned with democratic rights and democratic institutions. The methodology for assessing democracy used in this democracy index is according to Economist Intelligence Unit which is part of the Economist Group, a UK-based private company, which publishes the weekly newspaper The Economist. The index is based on 60 indicators grouped into five categories, measuring pluralism, civil liberties, and political culture. In addition to a numeric score and a ranking, the index categorizes each country into one of four regime types: full democracies, flawed democracies, hybrid regimes, and authoritarian regimes. The first Democracy Index report was published in 2006. Reports were published every two years until 2010 and annually thereafter. The index includes 167 countries and territories, of which 166 are sovereign states and 164 are UN member states. Other democracy indices with similar assessments of the state of democracy include V-Dem Democracy indices or Bertelsmann Transformation Index.
A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system as a result of an ongoing change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one. The process is known as democratisation, political changes moving in a democratic direction. Democratization waves have been linked to sudden shifts in the distribution of power among the great powers, which created openings and incentives to introduce sweeping domestic reforms. Although transitional regimes experience more civil unrest, they may be considered stable in a transitional phase for decades at a time. Since the end of the Cold War transitional regimes have become the most common form of government. Scholarly analysis of the decorative nature of democratic institutions concludes that the opposite democratic backsliding (autocratization), a transition to authoritarianism is the most prevalent basis of modern hybrid regimes.
A hybrid regime is a type of political system often created as a result of an incomplete democratic transition from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one. Hybrid regimes are categorized as having a combination of autocratic features with democratic ones and can simultaneously hold political repressions and regular elections. Hybrid regimes are commonly found in developing countries with abundant natural resources such as petro-states. Although these regimes experience civil unrest, they may be relatively stable and tenacious for decades at a time. There has been a rise in hybrid regimes since the end of the Cold War.
Staffan I. Lindberg, is a Swedish political scientist, Principal Investigator for Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute and Director of the V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg. He is a professor in the Department of Political Science, and member of the Board of University of Gothenburg, Sweden member of the Young Academy of Sweden, Wallenberg Academy Fellow, Research Fellow at the Quality of Government Institute; and senior advisor for the Oslo Analytica.
Democracy in Bangladesh is historically connected to the Westminster style of democracy of United Kingdom while Bangladesh was part of British Colonial Empire from 1700 to 1947. Since Bangladesh achieved its independence on 26 March 1971 from Pakistan, Bangladesh introduced parliamentary democracy into its political system; however, a military coup in 1975 halted the process. It was restored in 1991 through a constitutional amendment.
Democratic backsliding is a process of regime change toward autocracy in which the exercise of political power becomes more arbitrary and repressive. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic decline involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.
India was the 19th most electoral democratic country in Asia according to V-Dem Democracy indices in 2023 with a score of 0.399 out of 1. The Economist Democracy Index in 2022 considered India a flawed democracy.
Democracy in Africa is measured according to various definitions of democracy by a variety of indexes, such as V-Dem Democracy indices, and Democracy Index by The Economist.
The V-Dem Institute, founded by Staffan I. Lindberg in 2014, studies the qualities of government. The headquarters of the project is based at the department of political science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Democratic backsliding, also known as autocratization, is the decline in democratic qualities of a political regime, the opposite of democratization.
Democratic backsliding in the United States has been identified as a trend at the state and national levels in various indices and analyses. Democratic backsliding is "a process of regime change towards autocracy that makes the exercise of political power more arbitrary and repressive and that restricts the space for public contestation and political participation in the process of government selection".
The Democracy Indices by V-Dem are democracy indices published by the V-Dem Institute that describe qualities of different democracies. It is published annually. In particular, the V-Dem dataset is popular among political scientists and describes the characteristics of political regimes. Datasets released by the V-Dem Institute include information on hundreds of indicator variables describing all aspects of government, especially on the quality of democracy, inclusivity, and other economic indicators.
Democracy indices are quantitative and comparative assessments of the state of democracy for different countries according to various definitions of democracy.
The Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean can be compared according to the different definitions of democracy. The V-Dem Democracy indices considers the Latin American and Caribbean countries with the highest democracy scores in 2023 as Costa Rica, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and Jamaica and countries with lowest democracy scores as Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela. Democratic backsliding can be observed in parts of Latin America and the Caribbean. Democratization is reported by V-Dem Democracy Report 2024 in Brazil, Dominican Republic, Honduras and Bolivia.
Democracy in Europe can be comparatively assessed according to various definitions of democracy. According to the V-Dem Democracy Indices, the European countries with the highest democracy scores in 2023 are Denmark, Norway and Sweden, meanwhile the European countries with lowest democracy scores in 2023 are Belarus, Russia and Turkey.