Dirty bomb

Last updated

A dirty bomb or radiological dispersal device is a radiological weapon that combines radioactive material with conventional explosives. The purpose of the weapon is to contaminate the area around the dispersal agent/conventional explosion with radioactive material, serving primarily as an area denial device against civilians. [1] [2] [3] It is not to be confused with a nuclear explosion, such as a fission bomb, which produces blast effects far in excess of what is achievable by the use of conventional explosives. Unlike the cloud of radiation from a typical fission bomb, a dirty bomb's radiation can be dispersed only within a few hundred meters or a few miles of the explosion. [4]

Contents

Dirty bombs have never been used, only tested. They are designed to disperse radioactive material over a certain area. They act through the effects of radioactive contamination on the environment and related health effects of radiation poisoning in the affected populations. The containment and decontamination of victims, as well as decontamination of the affected area require considerable time and expenses, rendering areas partly unusable and causing economic damage. Dirty bombs might be used to create mass panic as a weapon of terror.

Effect of a dirty bomb explosion

When dealing with the implications of a dirty bomb attack, there are two main areas to be addressed: the civilian impact, not only dealing with immediate casualties and long term health issues, but also the psychological effect, and the economic impact. With no prior event of a dirty bomb detonation, it is considered difficult to predict the impact. Several analyses have predicted that radiological dispersal devices will neither sicken nor kill many people. [5]

Differences between dirty bombs and fission bombs
Dirty bomb
  • Explosives combined with radioactive materials
  • Detonation vaporizes or aerosolizes radioactive material and propels it into the air
  • Not a nuclear detonation
Fission bomb
  • Caused by an uncontrolled nuclear chain reaction with highly enriched uranium or weapons-grade plutonium
  • Sphere of fissile material (pit) surrounded by explosive lenses
  • Initial explosion produces imploding shock wave that compresses pit inward, creating supercritical mass by increasing the density of fissile material. Neutrons from either modulated neutron initiator or external neutron generator start chain reaction in compressed pit
  • Resulting fission chain reaction causes bomb to explode with tremendous force: nuclear detonation

Source: Adapted from Levi MA, Kelly HC. "Weapons of mass disruption". Sci Am. 2002 Nov;287(5):76-81. [6]

Accidents with radioactives

The effects of uncontrolled radioactive contamination have been reported several times.

One example is the radiological accident occurring in Goiânia, Brazil, between September 1987 and March 1988: Two metal scavengers broke into an abandoned radiotherapy clinic and removed a teletherapy source capsule containing powdered caesium-137 with an activity of 50 TBq. They brought it back to the home of one of the men to take it apart and sell as scrap metal. Later that day both men were showing acute signs of radiation illness with vomiting and one of the men had a swollen hand and diarrhea. A few days later one of the men punctured the 1-millimetre-thick (0.039 in) thick window of the capsule, allowing the caesium chloride powder to leak out and when realizing the powder glowed blue in the dark, brought it back home to his family and friends to show it off. After two weeks of spread by contact contamination causing an increasing number of adverse health effects, the correct diagnosis of acute radiation sickness was made at a hospital and proper precautions could be put into procedure. By this time 249 people were contaminated, 151 exhibited both external and internal contamination of which 20 people were seriously ill and five people died. [7]

The Goiânia incident to some extent predicts the contamination pattern if it is not immediately realized that the explosion spread radioactive material, but also how fatal even very small amounts of ingested radioactive powder can be. [8] This raises worries of terrorists using powdered alpha emitting material, that if ingested can pose a serious health risk, [9] as in the case of Alexander Litvinenko, who was poisoned by tea with polonium-210. "Smoky bombs" based on alpha emitters might easily be just as dangerous as beta or gamma emitting dirty bombs. [10]

Public perception of risks

Although the exposure might be minimal, many people find radiation exposure especially frightening because it is something they cannot see or feel, and it therefore becomes an unknown source of danger. [11] When United States Attorney General John Ashcroft on June 10, 2002, announced the arrest of José Padilla, allegedly plotting to detonate such a weapon, he said:

[A] radioactive "dirty bomb" ... spreads radioactive material that is highly toxic to humans and can cause mass death and injury.

— Attorney General John Ashcroft [8]

This public fear of radiation also plays a big role in why the costs of a radiological dispersal device impact on a major metropolitan area (such as lower Manhattan) might be equal to or even larger than that of the 9/11 attacks. [8] Assuming the radiation levels are not too high and the area does not need to be abandoned such as the town of Pripyat near the Chernobyl reactor, [12] an expensive and time-consuming cleanup procedure will begin. This will mainly consist of tearing down highly contaminated buildings, digging up contaminated soil and quickly applying sticky substances to remaining surfaces so that radioactive particles adhere before radioactivity penetrates the building materials. [13] These procedures are the current state of the art for radioactive contamination cleanup, but some experts say that a complete cleanup of external surfaces in an urban area to current decontamination limits may not be technically feasible. [8] Loss of working hours will be vast during cleanup, but even after the radiation levels reduce to an acceptable level, there might be residual public fear of the site including possible unwillingness to conduct business as usual in the area. Tourist traffic is likely never to resume. [8]

Dirty bombs and terrorism

Since the 9/11 attacks, the fear of terrorist groups using dirty bombs has increased, which has been frequently reported in the media. [14] The meaning of terrorism used here, is described by the U.S. Department of Defense's definition, which is "the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological." [15]

Constructing and obtaining material for a dirty bomb

In order for a terrorist organization to construct and detonate a dirty bomb, it must acquire radioactive material. Possible radiological dispersal device material could come from the millions of radioactive sources used worldwide in the industry, for medical purposes and in academic applications mainly for research. [16] Of these sources, only nine reactor-produced isotopes stand out as being suitable for radiological terror: americium-241, californium-252, caesium-137, cobalt-60, iridium-192, plutonium-238, polonium-210, radium-226 and strontium-90, [17] and even from these it is possible that radium-226 and polonium-210 do not pose a significant threat. [18] Of these sources the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has estimated that within the U.S., approximately one source is lost, abandoned or stolen every day of the year. Within the European Union the annual estimate is 70. [19] There exist thousands of such "orphan" sources scattered throughout the world, but of those reported lost, no more than an estimated 20 percent can be classified as potential high security concerns if used in a radiological dispersal device. [18] Russia is believed to house thousands of orphan sources, which were lost following the collapse of the Soviet Union. A large but unknown number of these sources probably belong to the high security risk category. These include the beta-emitting strontium-90 sources used as radioisotope thermoelectric generators for beacons in lighthouses in remote areas of Russia. [20] In December 2001, three Georgian woodcutters stumbled over such a power generator and dragged it back to their camp site to use it as a heat source. Within hours they suffered from acute radiation sickness and sought hospital treatment. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) later stated that it contained approximately 40 kilocuries (1.5  PBq ) of strontium, [21] equivalent to the amount of radioactivity released immediately after the Chernobyl accident (though the total radioactivity release from Chernobyl was 2500 times greater at around 100 MCi (3,700 PBq) [22] ).

Although a terrorist organization might obtain radioactive material through the "black market", [23] and there has been a steady increase in illicit trafficking of radioactive sources from 1996 to 2004, these recorded trafficking incidents mainly refer to rediscovered orphan sources without any sign of criminal activity, [17] and it has been argued that there is no conclusive evidence for such a market. [24] In addition to the hurdles of obtaining usable radioactive material, there are several conflicting requirements regarding the properties of the material the terrorists need to take into consideration: First, the source should be "sufficiently" radioactive to create direct radiological damage at the explosion or at least to perform societal damage or disruption. Second, the source should be transportable with enough shielding to protect the carrier, but not so much that it will be too heavy to maneuver. Third, the source should be sufficiently dispersible to effectively contaminate the area around the explosion. [25]

Possibility of use by terrorist groups

The first attempt of radiological terror was reportedly carried out in November 1995 by a group of Chechen separatists, who buried a caesium-137 source wrapped in explosives at the Izmaylovsky Park in Moscow. A Chechen rebel leader alerted the media, the bomb was never activated, and the incident amounted to a mere publicity stunt. [26] [21] In December 1998, a second attempt was announced by the Chechen Security Service, who discovered a container filled with radioactive materials attached to an explosive mine. The bomb was hidden near a railway line in the suburban area Argun, ten miles east of the Chechen capital of Grozny. The same Chechen separatist group was suspected to be involved. [27] [21]

On 8 May 2002, José Padilla (a.k.a. Abdulla al-Muhajir) was arrested on suspicion that he was an al-Qaeda terrorist planning to detonate a dirty bomb in the U.S. This suspicion was raised by information obtained from an arrested terrorist in U.S. custody, Abu Zubaydah, who under interrogation revealed that the organization was close to constructing a dirty bomb. Although Padilla had not obtained radioactive material or explosives at the time of arrest, law enforcement authorities uncovered evidence that he was on reconnaissance for usable radioactive material and possible locations for detonation. [28] It has been doubted whether José Padilla was preparing such an attack, and it has been claimed that the arrest was highly politically motivated, given the pre-9/11 security lapses by the CIA and FBI. [29]

In 2006, Dhiren Barot from North London pleaded guilty of conspiring to murder people in the United Kingdom and United States using a radioactive dirty bomb. He planned to target underground car parks within the UK and buildings in the U.S. such as the International Monetary Fund, World Bank buildings in Washington D.C., the New York Stock Exchange, Citigroup buildings and the Prudential Financial buildings in Newark, New Jersey. He also faces 12 other charges including, conspiracy to commit public nuisance, seven charges of making a record of information for terrorist purposes and four charges of possessing a record of information for terrorist purposes. Experts say if the plot to use the dirty bomb was carried out "it would have been unlikely to cause deaths, but was designed to affect about 500 people". [30]

In January 2009, a leaked FBI report described the results of a search of the Maine home of James G. Cummings, a white supremacist who had been shot and killed by his wife. Investigators found four one-gallon containers of 35 percent hydrogen peroxide, uranium, thorium, lithium metal, aluminum powder, beryllium, boron, black iron oxide and magnesium as well as literature on how to build dirty bombs and information about caesium-137, strontium-90 and cobalt-60, radioactive materials. [31] Officials confirmed the veracity of the report but stated that the public was never at risk. [32]

In July 2014, ISIS militants seized 88 pounds (40 kg) of uranium compounds from Mosul University. The material was unenriched and so could not be used to build a conventional fission bomb, but a dirty bomb is a theoretical possibility. However, uranium's relatively low radioactivity makes it a poor candidate for use in a dirty bomb. [33] [34]

Terrorist organizations may also capitalize on the fear of radiation to create weapons of mass disruption rather than weapons of mass destruction. A fearful public response may in itself accomplish the goals of a terrorist organization to gain publicity or destabilize society. [35] Even simply stealing radioactive materials may trigger a panic reaction from the general public. Similarly, a small-scale release of radioactive materials or a threat of such a release may be considered sufficient for a terror attack. [35] Particular concern is directed towards the medical sector and healthcare sites which are "intrinsically more vulnerable than conventional licensed nuclear sites". [35] Opportunistic attacks may range to even kidnapping patients whose treatment involve radioactive materials. Of note is the public reaction to the Goiânia accident, in which over 100,000 people admitted themselves to monitoring, while only 49 were admitted to hospitals. Other benefits to a terrorist organization of a dirty bomb include economic disruption in the area affected, abandonment of affected assets (such a buildings, subways) due to public concern, and international publicity useful for recruitment. [36]

Tests

Israel carried out a four-year series of tests on nuclear explosives to measure the effects were hostile forces ever to use them against Israel, Haaretz reported in 2015. According to the report, high-level radiation was measured only at the center of the explosions, while the level of dispersal of radiation by particles carried by the wind (fallout) was low. The bombs reportedly did not pose a significant danger beyond their psychological effect. [37]

Detection and prevention

Dirty bombs may be prevented by detecting illicit radioactive materials in shipping with tools such as a Radiation Portal Monitor. [38] Similarly, unshielded radioactive materials may be detected at checkpoints by Geiger Counters, gamma-ray detectors, and even Customs and Border Patrol (CBS) pager-sized radiation detectors. [36] Hidden materials may also be detected by x-ray inspection and heat emitted may be picked up by infrared detectors. Such devices, however, may be circumvented by simply transporting materials across unguarded stretches of coastline or other barren border areas. [36]

One proposed method for detecting shielded Dirty Bombs is Nanosecond Neutron Analysis (NNA). [39] Designed originally for the detection of explosives and hazardous chemicals, NNA is also applicable to fissile materials. NNA determines what chemicals are present in an investigated device by analyzing emitted γ-emission neutrons and α-particles created from a reaction in the neutron generator. The system records the temporal and spatial displacement of the neutrons and α-particles within separate 3D regions. [39] A prototype dirty-bomb detection device created with NNA is demonstrated to be able to detect uranium from behind a 5 cm-thick lead wall. [39] Other radioactive material detectors include Radiation Assessment and Identification (RAID) and Sensor for Measurement and Analysis of Radiation Transients, both developed by Sandia National Laboratories. [40] Sodium iodide scintillator based aerial radiation detection systems are capable to detect International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) defined dangerous quantities of radioactive material [41] and have been deployed by the New York City Police Department (NYPD) Counterterrorism Bureau. [42]

The IAEA recommends certain devices be used in tandem at country borders to prevent transfer of radioactive materials, and thus the building of dirty bombs. [43] They define the four main goals of radiation detection instruments as detection, verification, assessment and localization, and identification as a means to escalate a potential radiological situation. The IAEA also defines the following types of instruments: [43]

Legislative and regulatory actions can also be used to prevent access to materials needed to create a dirty bomb. Examples include the 2006 U.S. Dirty Bomb Bill, the Yucca Flats proposal, and the Nunn-Lungar act. [40] Similarly, close monitoring and restrictions of radioactive materials may provide security for materials in vulnerable private-sector applications, most notably in the medical sector where such materials are used for treatments. [35] Suggestions for increased security include isolation of materials in remote locations and strict limitation of access.

One way to mitigate a major effect of a radiological weapons may also be to educate the public on the nature of radioactive materials. As one of the major concerns of a dirty bomb is the public panic proper education may prove a viable counter-measure. [36] Education on radiation is considered by some to be "the most neglected issue related to radiological terrorism". [35]

Personal safety

The dangers of a dirty bomb come from the initial blast and the radioactive materials [44] [45] To mitigate the risk of radiation exposure, FEMA suggests the following guidelines:

Treatment

As of 2023, research is under way to find radioactive decontanimation drugs to remove radioactive elements from the body. One drug candidate under investigation is HOPO 14-1. [46]

See also

Related Research Articles

A cobalt bomb is a type of "salted bomb": a nuclear weapon designed to produce enhanced amounts of radioactive fallout, intended to contaminate a large area with radioactive material, potentially for the purpose of radiological warfare, mutual assured destruction or as doomsday devices. There is no firm evidence that such a device has ever been built or tested.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear technology</span> Technology that involves the reactions of atomic nuclei

Nuclear technology is technology that involves the nuclear reactions of atomic nuclei. Among the notable nuclear technologies are nuclear reactors, nuclear medicine and nuclear weapons. It is also used, among other things, in smoke detectors and gun sights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear terrorism</span> Terrorism involving nuclear material or weapons

Nuclear terrorism refers to any person or persons detonating a nuclear weapon as an act of terrorism. Some definitions of nuclear terrorism include the sabotage of a nuclear facility and/or the detonation of a radiological device, colloquially termed a dirty bomb, but consensus is lacking. In legal terms, nuclear terrorism is an offense committed if a person unlawfully and intentionally "uses in any way radioactive material … with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or with the intent to cause substantial damage to property or to the environment; or with the intent to compel a natural or legal person, an international organization or a State to do or refrain from doing an act", according to the 2005 United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radiological warfare</span> Attacks using radioactive material with intent of contamination of an area

Radiological warfare is any form of warfare involving deliberate radiation poisoning or contamination of an area with radiological sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear and radiation accidents and incidents</span> Severe disruptive events involving fissile or fusile materials

A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "an event that has led to significant consequences to people, the environment or the facility." Examples include lethal effects to individuals, large radioactivity release to the environment, or a reactor core melt. The prime example of a "major nuclear accident" is one in which a reactor core is damaged and significant amounts of radioactive isotopes are released, such as in the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioactive contamination</span> Undesirable radioactive elements on surfaces or in gases, liquids, or solids

Radioactive contamination, also called radiological pollution, is the deposition of, or presence of radioactive substances on surfaces or within solids, liquids, or gases, where their presence is unintended or undesirable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Goiânia accident</span> 1987 radioactive contamination incident in Brazil

The Goiânia accident was a radioactive contamination accident that occurred on September 13, 1987, in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, after an unsecured radiotherapy source was stolen from an abandoned hospital site in the city. It was subsequently handled by many people, resulting in four deaths. About 112,000 people were examined for radioactive contamination and 249 of them were found to have been contaminated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caesium-137</span> Radioactive isotope of caesium

Caesium-137, cesium-137 (US), or radiocaesium, is a radioactive isotope of caesium that is formed as one of the more common fission products by the nuclear fission of uranium-235 and other fissionable isotopes in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. Trace quantities also originate from spontaneous fission of uranium-238. It is among the most problematic of the short-to-medium-lifetime fission products. Caesium-137 has a relatively low boiling point of 671 °C (1,240 °F) and easily becomes volatile when released suddenly at high temperature, as in the case of the Chernobyl nuclear accident and with atomic explosions, and can travel very long distances in the air. After being deposited onto the soil as radioactive fallout, it moves and spreads easily in the environment because of the high water solubility of caesium's most common chemical compounds, which are salts. Caesium-137 was discovered by Glenn T. Seaborg and Margaret Melhase.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lake Karachay</span> Former radioactive waste dumping site in Russia

Lake Karachay, sometimes spelled Karachai or Karachaj, was a small lake in the southern Ural mountains in central Russia. Starting in 1951, the Soviet Union used Karachay as a dumping site for radioactive waste from Mayak, the nearby nuclear waste storage and reprocessing facility, located near the town of Ozyorsk. Today the lake is completely infilled, acting as "a near-surface permanent and dry nuclear waste storage facility."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear Emergency Support Team</span> US federal government organization

The Nuclear Emergency Support Team (NEST), formerly known as the Nuclear Emergency Search Team is a team of scientists, technicians, and engineers operating under the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA). NEST is the umbrella designation that encompasses all DOE/NNSA radiological and nuclear emergency response functions; some of which date back more than 60 years. NEST's responsibilities include both national security missions, particularly; countering weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and public health and safety, including responses to nuclear reactor accidents. NEST's task is to be 'prepared to respond immediately to any type of radiological accident or incident anywhere in the world'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plutonium in the environment</span> Plutonium present within the environment

Since the mid-20th century, plutonium in the environment has been primarily produced by human activity. The first plants to produce plutonium for use in cold war atomic bombs were at the Hanford nuclear site, in Washington, and Mayak nuclear plant, in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia. Over a period of four decades, "both released more than 200 million curies of radioactive isotopes into the surrounding environment – twice the amount expelled in the Chernobyl disaster in each instance".

This article compares the radioactivity release and decay from the Chernobyl disaster with various other events which involved a release of uncontrolled radioactivity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioecology</span> Ecology concerning radioactivity within ecosystems

Radioecology is the branch of ecology concerning the presence of radioactivity in Earth’s ecosystems. Investigations in radioecology include field sampling, experimental field and laboratory procedures, and the development of environmentally predictive simulation models in an attempt to understand the migration methods of radioactive material throughout the environment.

Nuclear MASINT is one of the six major subdisciplines generally accepted to make up Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT), which covers measurement and characterization of information derived from nuclear radiation and other physical phenomena associated with nuclear weapons, reactors, processes, materials, devices, and facilities. Nuclear monitoring can be done remotely or during onsite inspections of nuclear facilities. Data exploitation results in characterization of nuclear weapons, reactors, and materials. A number of systems detect and monitor the world for nuclear explosions, as well as nuclear materials production.

A salted bomb is a nuclear weapon designed to function as a radiological weapon by producing larger quantities of radioactive fallout than unsalted nuclear arms. This fallout can render a large area uninhabitable. The term is derived both from the means of their manufacture, which involves the incorporation of additional elements to a standard atomic weapon, and from the expression "to salt the earth", meaning to render an area uninhabitable for generations. The idea originated with Hungarian-American physicist Leo Szilard, in February 1950. His intent was not to propose that such a weapon be built, but to show that nuclear weapon technology would soon reach the point where it could end human life on Earth.

Improvised nuclear devices or (INDs) are theoretical illicit nuclear weapons bought, stolen, or otherwise originating from a nuclear state, or a weapon fabricated by a terrorist group from illegally obtained fissile nuclear weapons material that produces a nuclear explosion. An IND could be bought, or it could be built from the components of a stolen weapon or from scratch using nuclear material. A successful detonation would result in catastrophic loss of life, destruction of infrastructure, and nuclear contamination of a very large area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radiation portal monitor</span> Passive radiation detection device

Radiation Portal Monitors (RPMs) are passive radiation detection devices used for the screening of individuals, vehicles, cargo or other vectors for detection of illicit sources such as at borders or secure facilities. Fear of terrorist attacks with radiological weapons spurred RPM deployment for cargo scanning since 9/11, particularly in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Response Scenario Number One</span> US government protocol against a nuclear attack

National Response Scenario Number One is the United States federal government's planned response to a small scale nuclear attack. It is one of the National Response Scenarios developed by the United States Department of Homeland Security, considered the most likely of fifteen emergency scenarios to impact the United States. The Scenarios are related to the National Response Framework (NRF), which describes the structures and mechanisms of a response and the National Incident Management System (NIMS) that gives a framework to orchestrate emergency management. The scenario anticipates terrorists detonating a single, 10 kiloton weapon in a major city, as opposed to a full-scale nuclear war, in which a foreign power such as Russia or China would detonate hundreds or thousands of weapons.

The vulnerability of nuclear plants to deliberate attack is of concern in the area of nuclear safety and security. Nuclear power plants, civilian research reactors, certain naval fuel facilities, uranium enrichment plants, fuel fabrication plants, and even potentially uranium mines are vulnerable to attacks which could lead to widespread radioactive contamination. The attack threat is of several general types: commando-like ground-based attacks on equipment which if disabled could lead to a reactor core meltdown or widespread dispersal of radioactivity; external attacks such as an aircraft crash into a reactor complex, or cyber attacks.

References

Notes

  1. ↑ "Dirty Bomb". Archived from the original on 2011-10-20. Retrieved 2014-01-07.
  2. ↑ "Yahoo Screen - Watch videos online". Yahoo Screen. 23 March 2015. Retrieved 30 March 2015.[ permanent dead link ]
  3. ↑ "BBC NEWS - Science/Nature - Chernobyl's 'nuclear nightmares'". 13 July 2006. Retrieved 30 March 2015.
  4. ↑ "Backgrounder on Dirty Bombs". NRC.gov. 23 February 2022.
  5. ↑ Reshetin (2005); Dingle (2005)
  6. ↑ Levi, Michael A.; Kelly, Henry C. (November 2002). "Weapons of Mass Disruption". Scientific American. 287 (5): 76–81. Bibcode:2002SciAm.287e..76L. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1102-76. ISSN   0036-8733. PMID   12395729.
  7. ↑ King (2004); Zimmerman and Loeb (2004); Sohier and Hardeman (2006)
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Zimmerman and Loeb (2004)
  9. ↑ Mullen et al. (2002); Reshetin (2005)
  10. ↑ Zimmerman (2006)
  11. ↑ Johnson (2003)
  12. ↑ "The Lifeless Silence of Pripyat", Time , June 23, 1986.
  13. ↑ Vantine and Crites (2002); Zimmerman and Loeb (2004); Weiss (2005)
  14. ↑ Petroff (2007)
  15. ↑ "terrorism". dtic.mil. Archived from the original on 10 November 2011.
  16. ↑ Ferguson et al. (2003); Frost (2005)
  17. 1 2 Frost (2005)
  18. 1 2 Ferguson et al. (2003)
  19. ↑ Ferguson et al. (2003); Zimmerman and Loeb (2004)
  20. ↑ Burgess (2003); Van Tuyle and Mullen (2003); Sohier and Hardeman (2006)
  21. 1 2 3 Krock, Lexi; Deusser, Rebecca (February 2003). "Chronology of events". NOVA.
  22. ↑ Nave, R. "Chernobyl". HyperPhysics. gsu.edu.
  23. ↑ King (2004); Hoffman (2006)
  24. ↑ Belyaninov (1994); Frost (2005)
  25. ↑ Sohier and Hardeman (2006)
  26. ↑ King (2004)
  27. ↑ Edwards (2004)
  28. ↑ Ferguson et al. (2003); Hosenball et al. (2002)
  29. ↑ Burgess (2003); King (2004)
  30. ↑ "Man admits UK-US terror bomb plot". BBC News. 2006-10-12. Retrieved 2010-04-01.
  31. ↑ Report: 'Dirty bomb' parts found in slain man's home Archived 2009-02-14 at the Wayback Machine , Bangor Daily News, 10 February 2009
  32. ↑ Officials verify dirty bomb probe results Archived 2009-02-13 at the Wayback Machine , Bangor Daily News, 11 February 2009
  33. ↑ Burnett, Stephanie (July 10, 2014). "Iraqi 'Terrorist Groups' Have Seized Nuclear Materials". Time.
  34. ↑ "ISIS seizes uranium from lab; experts downplay 'dirty bomb' threat". Fox News . 24 March 2015.
  35. 1 2 3 4 5 Samuel., Apikyan; J., Diamond, David; Greg., Kaser (2006-01-01). Countering nuclear and radiological terrorism. Springer. ISBN   140204920X. OCLC   209940539.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. 1 2 3 4 Medalia, Jonathan. Terrorist "Dirty Bombs": A Brief Primer. Congressional Research Service. pp. 3–6.
  37. ↑ Levinson, Chaim (8 June 2015). "Haaretz Exclusive: Israel Tested 'Dirty-bomb Cleanup' in the Desert". Haaretz. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  38. ↑ Richards, Anne (2013). United States Customs and Border Protection's Radiation Portal Monitors at Seaports. Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General.
  39. 1 2 3 Samuel., Apikyan; J., Diamond, David; Ralph., Way; Organization., North Atlantic Treaty (2008-01-01). Prevention, detection and response to nuclear and radiological threats. Springer. ISBN   9781402066573. OCLC   171556526.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  40. 1 2 Brown, Chad (February 2006). "Transcendental Terrorism And Dirty Bombs: Radiological Weapons Threat Revisited". Occasional Paper: Center for Strategy and Technology. 54: 24–27.
  41. ↑ Ritter, Sebastian (2021). "Detection Limits of NaI Scintillator Detector Based Aerial Source Detection Systems". arXiv: 2111.07756 [physics.ins-det].
  42. ↑ Dienst, Jonathan; Paredes, David; Strich, Emily (October 6, 2017). "I-Team: Inside the NYPD's New Radiation-Detecting Plane". NBC New York. NBC 4 New York. Retrieved December 3, 2021.
  43. 1 2 atomique., Agence internationale de l'énergie (2002-01-01). Detection of radioactive materials at borders. IAEA. ISBN   9201161026. OCLC   856404390.
  44. ↑ "Fact Sheet: Dirty Bomb" (PDF). www.fema.gov. June 2007. Retrieved April 27, 2017.
  45. ↑ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Dirty Bombs, by CDC
  46. ↑ "First-in-human trial of oral drug to remove radioactive contamination begins". National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2023-05-15. Retrieved 2023-05-16.
  47. ↑ "Hitman 3: Contracts", HD walkthrough (Professional), Mission 3 - The Bjarkhov Bomb". YouTube. 2012-03-23. Archived from the original on 2021-12-11. Retrieved 2019-08-06.
  48. ↑ Hornshaw, Phil (1 June 2018). "'Detroit: Become Human' endings guide". Digital Trends . Archived from the original on 14 June 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2019. Under the right circumstances, North will tell Markus about a dirty bomb in Detroit during the Crossroads chapter. Taking the switch from her gives you the option to use it to force the authorities to spare the androids during the protest in Battle for Detroit.
  49. ↑ "Call of Duty®: Black Ops Cold War: Multiplayer Modes". www.callofduty.com. Retrieved 2020-11-23.

Works cited

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.