Emesa helmet

Last updated

Emesa helmet
Emesa helmet.png
The Emesa helmet
Material Iron, silver, gold
Weight2.217 kg (4.89 lb)
CreatedEarly 1st century AD
Discovered1936
Tell Abu Sabun, Homs, Syria
Present location National Museum of Damascus

The Emesa helmet (also known as the Homs helmet) is a Roman cavalry helmet from the early first century AD. It consists of an iron head piece and face mask, the latter of which is covered in a sheet of silver and presents the individualised portrait of a face, likely its owner. Decorations, some of which are gilded, adorn the head piece. Confiscated by Syrian police soon after looters discovered it amidst a complex of tombs in the modern-day city of Homs in 1936, eventually the helmet was restored thoroughly at the British Museum, and is now in the collection of the National Museum of Damascus. It has been exhibited internationally, although as of 2017, due to the Syrian civil war, the more valuable items owned by the National Museum are hidden in underground storage.

Contents

Ornately designed yet highly functional, the helmet was probably intended for both parades and battle. Its delicate covering is too fragile to have been put to use during cavalry tournaments, but the thick iron core would have defended against blows and arrows. Narrow slits for the eyes, with three small holes underneath to allow downward sight, sacrificed vision for protection; roughly cut notches below each eye suggest a hastily made modification of necessity.

The helmet was found in a tomb near a monument to a former ruler of Emesa and, considering the lavishness of the silver and gold design, likely belonged to a member of the elite. As it is modelled after those helmets used in Roman tournaments, even if unlikely to have ever been worn in one, it may have been given by a Roman official to a Syrian general or, more likely, manufactured in Syria after the Roman style. The acanthus scroll ornamentation seen on the neck guard recalls that used on Syrian temples, suggesting that the helmet may have been made in the luxury workshops of Antioch.

Description

The neck guard of the Emesa helmet Emesa helmet - neck guard.png
The neck guard of the Emesa helmet

The Emesa helmet is made of iron and consists of two parts: a head piece and a face mask. [1] [2] The head piece, which includes a neck guard, is made of one piece of iron and attached decorations. [3] Attached to it are silver decorations, some of which are gilded in whole or in part: a diadem, a circular forehead rosette, a strip of metal serving as a crest, two ear guards, and a decorative plate over the neck guard. [3] The ear guards are each attached by three rivets, the top and bottom of which help hold the diadem and decorative plate, respectively, to the head piece; the edges of the diadem and plate are folded over the iron core for additional support. [3] The face mask hangs from the head piece by a central hinge, and would be fastened with straps connecting a loop under each ear with corresponding holes in the neck guard. [1] [2] [3] The entire helmet, the iron core of which is between 1 and 6 millimetres thick, [4] weighs 2.217 kg (4.89 lb), of which the face mask comprises 982 g (2.16 lb). [2] [3]

The head piece is made of iron, now rusted. [3] The top contains a dent, [4] and shows the rusted impression of what once was a woven and likely colourful or patterned fabric. [1] [2] [3] [5] From ear to ear around the forehead runs a gilded diadem in the image of a laurel wreath, [1] a traditional symbol of victory. [6] Each side contains thirteen elements, each of three leaves and two berries. [7] The leaves are worked in repoussé, and stand out in strong relief with nearly straight walls. [7] Above the centre of the diadem is a rosette; it shows a flower with two rows, each of six petals, and an outer beaded border. [8] The beading and the outer row of petals are in white silver, contrasting with the gilding of the inner row, the background, and the central rivet anchoring the rosette to the head piece. [9] A narrow fluted strip serving as a crest, smooth silver with beaded edges, runs down the middle of the head piece from the rosette to the neck guard. [10] [11] The relative simplicity and inferiority of artisanship expressed by the crest and rosette may reflect repairs made locally, away from the luxury workshops of Antioch; unlike with the diadem, for example, the background of the rosette was not carefully punched down, but was flattened with a tubular instrument and now presents as a series of rings. [12]

The gold funerary mask from tomb 1 Emesa necropolis - tomb 1 - gold mask 03319.jpg
The gold funerary mask from tomb 1

The neck guard, flared outward to protect the shoulders, is covered with a decorative plate consisting of three horizontal designs. [13] At the top, over the base of the skull, a large torus of ivy leaves is bordered by cords; the ivy is gilded, though the cords are not. [14] In the middle, a smooth and concave transitional zone corresponds to the hollow of the neck. [7] At the bottom, an acanthus rinceau, or scroll, is interspersed with birds and butterflies. [1] [7] Portions of the bottom ornamentation are gilded, [8] giving the helmet, with all its silver, gold, and iron components, a polychrome appearance. [1] The ear guards encroach slightly on the bottom design, suggesting that they were not created specifically for the helmet. [8]

The face mask is made of iron, and covered with a sheet of silver. [7] The central hinge from which it hangs is made of three parts: an iron tube welded to the interior head piece with an exterior silver tube, a notched silver tube fixed to the face mask that envelops the first part, and a pin which passes through both and has a silver knob at each end. [14] The mask is shaped in the form of a human face. [7] Holes are drilled between the lips and as nostrils; the eyes each have a narrow slit, with three holes in a trefoil design, two round holes outside and a heart-shaped hole in the middle, underneath each eye to allow for a greater range of vision. [1] [15] [7] These apparently were not enough, for a small and rudimentary notch was carved into each of the heart-shaped holes to increase the wearer's vision. [16] The mask is approximately 2 millimetres thick, of which the silver, which is folded around both the edges and each hole to hold it to the iron, accounts for between .25 and .5 millimetres. [7]

Distinctive features cover the face mask. [1] [17] The nose is long and fleshy with a prominent bump, and extends high between the eyes. [1] [17] The cheekbones are low yet prominent, [1] [17] and the small mouth, which droops toward the sinister side, shows a thick lower lip. [1] Other features—the eyes and eyebrows, and the chin—are more conventional. [1] [17] The distinctive features suggest that the maker of the Emesa helmet attempted to translate some of the individual characteristics of the wearer's face into the helmet. [1] [18]

Function

The Emesa helmet is highly functional, and was likely made for both parades and battle. [19] [15] It is thick and heavy, which would have offered protection against heavy blows or arrows, [20] [15] the former of which may have caused the dent on the head piece. [4] Exceptionally narrow eye-slits also indicate care taken to increase protection; [20] [15] the rough manner in which the holes underneath were enlarged is likely the consequence of an emergency requiring a better field of vision. [16] Although classified as a cavalry sports helmet, the type worn in equestrian displays and tournaments known as the hippika gymnasia , it was unlikely to have been used in such events. [21] Tournament helmets were robust and manufactured without finesse, to withstand the rigours of contest unscathed. [22] The delicate ornamentation of the Emesa helmet, by contrast, would have been damaged easily, and thus suggests that it would have only been subjected to such risks in the exceptional circumstance of battle. [22]

Discovery

One of six Medusa ornaments from tomb 1's sarcophagus Emesa necropolis - tomb 1 - Medusa ornament 03314.jpg
One of six Medusa ornaments from tomb 1's sarcophagus

The helmet was discovered by looters in August 1936, [23] in the modern-day city of Homs. [24] Known as Emesa at the start of the first century AD, the city was at the eastern edge of the Roman Empire, and ruled by the Emesene dynasty, a client kingdom of the Romans. [25] Nearly 2,000 years later, the looters—digging near the former site of a monument to Sampsiceramus—found a complex of rich tombs, and removed the grave goods. [24] Their looting was uncovered because small golden plaques, adorning the burial shroud of the body in tomb 11, flaked off when disturbed. [24] The next morning, children noticed these gold flakes mixed in with the earth and brought them to a bazaar, where it came to the attention of the police; it ultimately led to the arrest of the looters, and the confiscation of the grave objects. [24] The objects, including the helmet, were then secured for the state collection by Emir Djaafar Abd el-Kader, curator of the National Museum of Damascus [26] —even as merchants, eager to capitalise on the stories, hawked modern forgeries and unrelated ancient objects said to come from the tombs of Emesa. [23]

The prompt intervention of el-Kader, who investigated the finds and interrogated the looters, allowed the finds to be recovered and well-understood. [23] He also led further excavations, as did the French archaeologists Daniel Schlumberger and Henri Seyrig. [23] The tomb in which the helmet was found—labelled tomb number 1, of the 22 in the complex—was a pitted grave with two chambers, one upper and one lower. [27] The lower chamber, constituting the proper tomb, had soil for a floor and rock for walls; it measured 2.2 by 1.25 m (7 ft 3 in by 4 ft 1 in), and was 1.72 m (5 ft 8 in) high. [28] Between five and seven eroded basalt beams were placed over the opening connecting the lower chamber with the upper, which was then backfilled to surface level. [29]

Tomb 1 included a rich assortment of objects. [28] As well as the helmet, it contained a gold funerary mask; a gold and turquoise bracelet; an ornate gold ring with a royal bust in relief; a gold ring with carnelian intaglio; a gold appliqué with a sheep's head and a bird's head; a star-shaped fibula; a gold hook; a small tongue of gold; a spearhead decorated with gold; a silver vase; and a triangle of glass. [29] The looters may have been incorrect in also attributing 19 gold plaques to the tomb, as these were seemingly identical to those from tomb 11. [30] Decorations from the sarcophagus included fragmentary silver rings; 22 gold leaves in repoussé; six masks of Medusa; four rectangles adorned with a lion; four Victories; and eight busts of Apollo. [29] According to Mohammed Moghrabi, who looted tomb 1, the helmet was found next to the skull. [29]

Restoration

30 April 1955 front cover of The Illustrated London News, issued shortly after the helmet's restoration 1955-04-30 - Illustrated London News - Emesa helmet.jpg
30 April 1955 front cover of The Illustrated London News , issued shortly after the helmet's restoration

After its discovery, the Emesa helmet underwent several unsuccessful restorations. [31] The primary problem was the oxidisation of the iron core, which created blisters and cracks in the silver covering. [32] Immediately after discovery, the helmet was sent to Paris for restoration by "MM. André père et fils"; only light work was carried out due to the hope that the Syrian climate would help slow the rate of oxidisation, and due to limited funds, but the helmet continued to deteriorate. [32] By 1952, the helmet was described as being significantly more damaged than it had been when excavated, and in urgent need of further work. [32] Eventually it was taken to the British Museum, where a final restoration was finished in 1955. [33] This was done by Herbert Maryon, [31] who in 1946 [34] [35] had reconstructed the Anglo-Saxon Sutton Hoo helmet. [36] In 1956, an account of the process was published by Harold Plenderleith, keeper of the museum's research laboratory. [37] Examination found the silver to be brittle, with cracks that had been filled in by a dark stopping substance. [4] The iron behind the face mask had rusted, putting further stress on the silver and forcing the cracks open by as much as 4 millimetres (0.16 in). [4] The face mask—held on by wire, as the hinge had detached—was therefore removed from the helmet to be worked on. [38]

The rusted iron was cut out from the back of the face mask around the mouth and jaw, where the distortions were greatest. [39] To strengthen the silver enough that it could be manipulated, the mask was placed in an electric furnace, and the temperature raised to 310 °C (590 °F) over three hours; blackened rust was then removed by brushing the mask with 9% oxalic acid, before heating it again, at 600 °C (1,112 °F) for eighteen hours and at 650 °C (1,202 °F) for thirteen. [39] The silver was then cleaned again, on both sides, with silver gauze temporarily soldered over the cracks in the back to allow the front to be wiped down. [39] The gauze was removed, the silver manipulated to close the cracks, and new gauze installed, permanently, using soft solder. [40] Thin lines of solder showing through the closed cracks were concealed with a surface coating of applied silver. [41] Finally, the iron that had been removed to expose the back of the silver was cleaned and placed back in position. [41] Although a few cracks remained visible higher up on the face mask, they were closed, as the iron behind them was sound and not exerting pressure, yet would have to be removed for restoration to occur. [41]

Display

The Nijmegen helmet is also classified as a cavalry sports helmet. Het Valkhof - Gesichtshelm eines Reiters.jpg
The Nijmegen helmet is also classified as a cavalry sports helmet.

After restoration at the British Museum, the helmet was displayed in the museum's King Edward Gallery as a month-long loan from 25 April 1955, then returned to Damascus. [33] [42] [43] From 1999 to 2002 the helmet was part of a travelling exhibition, Syria: Land of Civilizations, with stops in Switzerland, Canada, and the United States. [43] In 2017 the National Museum reopened after closing during the Syrian Civil War, but with the more valuable objects still hidden in underground storage. [44]

Typology

The helmet is dated to the first half of the first century AD, based on the style of the acanthus scroll on the back of the helmet, and other objects found with the helmet and in the tombs nearby. [45] [46] It is the earliest known Roman helmet with a face mask, and is broadly classified as a cavalry sports helmet—type D, according to the typology put forward by H. Russell Robinson. [10] Type D helmets are characterised by a single horizontal hinge attaching the face mask to the head piece, and by head pieces that are decorated to represent helmets. [47] [note 1] Several type D examples exist, such as the Nijmegen helmet, but unlike these, the Emesa helmet was probably never intended for sporting use. [49] It may instead have been given as a gift by a Roman official to a general of the ruling family of Emesa, or manufactured in Syria to the likeness of helmets seen during Roman tournaments. [45] [50] [21] The latter circumstance is thought more likely, for the acanthus ornamentation resembles that seen on Syrian temples. [51] The helmet may therefore have been commissioned from the workshops of Antioch, known for their luxury. [51]

See also

Notes

  1. This is in contrast to type C helmets, for example, which show idealistically youthful faces and head pieces with wavy hair. [48]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homs</span> City in western Syria, ancient Emesa

Homs, known in pre-Islamic Syria as Emesa, is a city in western Syria and the capital of the Homs Governorate. It is 501 metres (1,644 ft) above sea level and is located 162 kilometres (101 mi) north of Damascus. Located on the Orontes River, Homs is also the central link between the interior cities and the Mediterranean coast.

Umm el-Marra,, east of modern Aleppo in the Jabbul Plain of northern Syria, was one of the ancient Near East's oldest cities, located on a crossroads of two trade routes northwest of Ebla, in a landscape that was much more fertile than it is today. Possibly this is the city of Tuba mentioned in Egyptian inscriptions listing cities that were defeated or destroyed in the Pharaoh Thutmose III's north Syrian campaign. The city of Tuba is also mentioned in epigraphic remains from Ebla, Mari, and Alalakh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Benty Grange helmet</span> 7th-century boar-crested Anglo-Saxon helmet

The Benty Grange helmet is an Anglo-Saxon boar-crested helmet from the 7th century AD. It was excavated by Thomas Bateman in 1848 from a tumulus at the Benty Grange farm in Monyash in western Derbyshire. The grave had probably been looted by the time of Bateman's excavation, but still contained other high-status objects suggestive of a richly furnished burial, such as the fragmentary remains of a hanging bowl. The helmet is displayed at Sheffield's Weston Park Museum, which purchased it from Bateman's estate in 1893.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emesene dynasty</span> Roman client kingdom based in the Levant

The Emesenedynasty, also called the Sampsigeramids or the Sampsigerami or the House of Sampsigeramus, were a Roman client dynasty of Arab priest-kings known to have ruled by 46 BC from Arethusa and later from Emesa, Syria, until between 72 and 78/79, or at the latest the reign of Emperor Antoninus Pius (138–161). Iamblichus, the famous Neoplatonist philosopher of the third century, was one of their descendants, as was empress Julia Domna, matriarch of the Severan dynasty.

The Imperial helmet-type was a type of helmet worn by Roman legionaries. Prior to the Empire, Roman Republican soldiers often provided their own equipment, which was passed down from father to son. Thus, a variety of equipment, from different eras was present in the ranks. Even as the professional Imperial army emerged, and short-term service citizen soldiers became rare, useful equipment was never discarded. So when the improved Imperial helmet appeared, it replaced what remained of the very old Coolus type, which was largely superseded at the time by improved versions of the Montefortino helmet type, which continued to serve alongside it for a time. This constituted the final evolutionary stage of the legionary helmet (galea).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coppergate Helmet</span> 8th-century Anglo-Saxon helmet

The Coppergate Helmet is an eighth-century Anglo-Saxon helmet found in York, England. It was discovered in May 1982 during excavations for the Jorvik Viking Centre at the bottom of a pit that is thought to have once been a well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Menhet, Menwi and Merti</span> Three foreign-born wives of Thutmose III

Menhet, Menwi and Merti, also spelled Manhata, Manuwai and Maruta, were three minor foreign-born wives of Pharaoh Thutmose III of the Eighteenth Dynasty. They are known for their lavishly furnished rock-cut tomb in Wady Gabbanat el-Qurud near Luxor, Egypt. They are suggested to be Syrian, as the names all fit into Canaanite name forms, although their ultimate origin is unknown. A West Semitic origin is likely, but both West Semitic and Hurrian derivations have been suggested for Menwi. Each of the wives bear the title of "king's wife", and were likely only minor members of the royal harem. It is not known if the women were related as the faces on the lids of their canopic jars are all different.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sutton Hoo helmet</span> Decorated Anglo-Saxon helmet

The Sutton Hoo helmet is a decorated Anglo-Saxon helmet found during a 1939 excavation of the Sutton Hoo ship-burial. It was buried around the years c. 620–625 CE and is widely associated with an Anglo-Saxon leader, King Rædwald of East Anglia; its elaborate decoration may have given it a secondary function akin to a crown. The helmet was both a functional piece of armour that would have offered considerable protection if ever used in warfare, and a decorative, prestigious piece of extravagant metalwork. An iconic object from an archaeological find hailed as the "British Tutankhamen", it has become a symbol of the Early Middle Ages, "of Archaeology in general", and of England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Newstead Helmet</span> Iron Roman cavalry helmet dating to 80–100 AD, discovered in Scotland

The Newstead Helmet is an iron Roman cavalry helmet dating to 80–100 AD that was discovered at the site of a Roman fort in Newstead, near Melrose in Roxburghshire, Scotland in 1905. It is now part of the Newstead Collection at the National Museum in Edinburgh. The helmet would have been worn by auxiliary cavalrymen in cavalry displays known as hippika gymnasia. Its discoverer, Sir James Curle (1862–1944), described the helmet as "one of the most beautiful things that the receding tide of Roman conquest has left behind".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guisborough Helmet</span> Roman cavalry bronze helmet found in 1864

The Guisborough Helmet is a Roman cavalry bronze helmet found in 1864 near Guisborough in the North Riding of Yorkshire, England. It was originally fitted with a pair of protective cheek-pieces, which have not survived; the holes by which they were attached can be seen in front of the helmet's ear guards. It is lavishly decorated with incised, punched and embossed figures, indicating that it was probably used for displays or cavalry tournaments, though it may well have been intended to be worn in battle as well. The helmet was found in what appears to have been a carefully arranged deposition in a bed of gravel, distant from any known Roman sites. After it was recovered during road works it was donated to the British Museum in London, where it was restored and is currently on display.

<i>Hippika gymnasia</i>

The hippika gymnasia were ritual tournaments performed by the cavalry of the Roman Empire to both practice their skills and display their expertise. They took place on a parade ground situated outside a fort and involved the cavalry practicing manoeuvring and the handling of weapons such as javelins and spears. The riders and their mounts wore highly elaborate armour and helmets specially made for display purposes, decorated with images from classical mythology. Such tournaments served several purposes, improving the riders' skills, helping to build unit morale and impressing dignitaries and conquered peoples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Late Roman ridge helmet</span>

The Late Roman ridge helmet was a type of combat helmet of Late Antiquity used by soldiers of the Late Roman army. It was characterized by the possession of a bowl made up of two or four parts, united by a longitudinal ridge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nijmegen Helmet</span> Facial iron mask of a Roman horseman

The Nijmegen Helmet is a Roman cavalry sports helmet from the first or second century AD. It was found around 1915 in a gravel bed on the left bank of the Waal river, near the Dutch city of Nijmegen. The helmet would have been worn by the élite Roman cavalry. The head portion of the helmet is made of iron, while the mask and diadem are of bronze or brass. The helmet provides neck protection via a projecting rim overlaid with a thin bronze covering plated with silver. The diadem features two male and three female figures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shorwell helmet</span> Anglo-Saxon helmet from the early to mid-sixth century AD found near Shorwell on the Isle of Wight

The Shorwell helmet is an Anglo-Saxon helmet from the early to mid-sixth century AD found near Shorwell on the Isle of Wight in southern England. It was one of the grave goods of a high-status Anglo-Saxon warrior, and was found with other objects such as a pattern-welded sword and hanging bowl. One of only six known Anglo-Saxon helmets, alongside those found at Benty Grange (1848), Sutton Hoo (1939), Coppergate (1982), Wollaston (1997), and Staffordshire (2009), it is the sole example to derive from the continental Frankish style rather than the contemporaneous Northern "crested helmets" used in England and Scandinavia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aegina Treasure</span> Minoan gold hoard

The Aegina Treasure or Aigina Treasure is an important Minoan gold hoard said to have been found on the island of Aegina, Greece. Since 1892, it has been part of the British Museum's collection. It is one of the most important groups of Minoan jewellery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gevninge helmet fragment</span> 6th or 7th century artefact

The Gevninge helmet fragment is the dexter eyepiece of a helmet from the Viking Age or end of the Nordic Iron Age. It was found in 2000 during the excavation of a Viking farmstead in Gevninge, near Lejre, Denmark. The fragment is moulded from bronze and gilded, and consists of a stylised eyebrow with eyelashes above an oval opening. There are three holes at the top and bottom of the fragment to affix the eyepiece to a helmet. The fragment is significant as rare evidence of contemporaneous helmets, and also for its discovery in Gevninge, an outpost that is possibly connected to the Anglo-Saxon epic Beowulf. It has been in the collection of the Lejre Museum since its discovery, and has been exhibited internationally as part of a travelling exhibition on Vikings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Witcham Gravel helmet</span> Roman cavalry helmet from the first century CE

The Witcham Gravel helmet is a Roman auxiliary cavalry helmet from the first century AD. Only the decorative copper alloy casing remains; an iron core originally fit under the casing, but has now corroded away. The cap, neck guard, and cheek guards were originally tinned, giving the appearance of a silver helmet encircled by a gold band. The helmet's distinctive feature is the presence of three hollow bosses, out of an original six, that decorate the exterior. No other Roman helmet is known to have such a feature. They may be a decorative embellishment influenced by Etruscan helmets from the sixth century BC, which had similar, lead-filled bosses, that would have deflected blades.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tomb of Sampsigeramus</span> 1st century AD mausoleum (destroyed) in Emesa, Syria

The Tomb of Sampsigeramus was a mausoleum that formerly stood in the necropolis of Emesa. It is thought to have been built in 78 or 79 CE by a relative of the Emesene dynasty. The remains of the mausoleum were blown up with dynamite by the Ottoman authorities c. 1911, in order to make room for an oil depot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Necropolis of Emesa</span> Ancient necropolis in Syria

The necropolis of Emesa, also known as the necropolis of Tell Abu Sabun, was an ancient necropolis of modern-day Homs, in Syria. Excavations begun in August 1936 uncovered a total of 22 tombs before the greater part of this necropolis was made to disappear by 1952 in order to build the municipal stadium known today as Khalid ibn al-Walid Stadium. Among the artifacts found in these tombs was the Emesa helmet. The Tomb of Sampsigeramus, of which the remains had been blown up c. 1911 by the Ottoman authorities so as to make room for an oil depot, had also belonged to the necropolis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Portraits of Odaenathus</span> Artwork identified as King Odaenathus of Palmyra

Odaenathus, the king of Palmyra from 260 to 267 CE, has been identified by modern scholars as the subject of sculptures, seal impressions, and mosaic pieces. His city was part of the Roman Empire, and he came to dominate the Roman East when in 260 he defeated Shapur I, the Sasanian emperor of Persia, who had invaded the Roman Empire. Odaenathus besieged the Sasanian capital Ctesiphon in 263, and although the city did not fall, the campaign led to a full restoration of Roman provinces taken by Shapur I. In the aftermath of his Persian war, Odaenathus assumed the title King of Kings, which was a challenge to the Persian monarch's claims of authority in the region. Odaenathus ruled the Roman East unopposed with imperial consent. In 267, he was assassinated alongside his eldest son Herodianus while conducting a campaign against Germanic raiders in Bithynia; he was succeeded by his son Vaballathus under the regency of the widow queen Zenobia.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Seyrig 1952a, p. 67.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Seyrig 1952b, p. 101.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Seyrig 1952c, p. 210.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Plenderleith 1956, p. 226.
  5. Bartman 2005, p. 99 & n.2.
  6. Bartman 2005, p. 110.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Seyrig 1952c, p. 211.
  8. 1 2 3 Seyrig 1952c, p. 212.
  9. Seyrig 1952c, pp. 212–213.
  10. 1 2 Robinson 1975, pp. 121–122.
  11. Seyrig 1952c, pp. 210, 212–213.
  12. Seyrig 1952c, pp. 212–213, 227 n.2.
  13. Seyrig 1952c, pp. 210–211.
  14. 1 2 Seyrig 1952c, pp. 211–212.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Seyrig 1952b, p. 102.
  16. 1 2 Plenderleith 1956, pp. 228–229.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Seyrig 1952b, p. 107.
  18. Seyrig 1952b, pp. 107–108.
  19. Seyrig 1952a, pp. 67–69.
  20. 1 2 Seyrig 1952a, pp. 67–68.
  21. 1 2 Robinson 1975, p. 122.
  22. 1 2 Seyrig 1952b, p. 105.
  23. 1 2 3 4 Seyrig 1952c, p. 205.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Seyrig 1952a, p. 66.
  25. Konrad 2017, pp. 263–264.
  26. Seyrig 1952a, pp. 66–67.
  27. Seyrig 1952c, pp. 205–208.
  28. 1 2 Seyrig 1952c, pp. 207–208.
  29. 1 2 3 4 Seyrig 1952c, p. 208.
  30. Seyrig 1952c, pp. 208, 244–245.
  31. 1 2 Huey 1962, pp. 1–2.
  32. 1 2 3 Seyrig 1952c, p. 213.
  33. 1 2 Illustrated London News 1955a.
  34. Bruce-Mitford 1946, pp. 2–4.
  35. Martin-Clarke 1947, p. 63 n.19.
  36. Maryon 1947.
  37. Plenderleith 1956.
  38. Plenderleith 1956, pp. 226–227.
  39. 1 2 3 Plenderleith 1956, p. 227.
  40. Plenderleith 1956, pp. 227–228.
  41. 1 2 3 Plenderleith 1956, p. 228.
  42. Illustrated London News 1955b.
  43. 1 2 Fortin 1999, p. 113.
  44. Armenia Public Radio 2017.
  45. 1 2 Seyrig 1952a, p. 69.
  46. Seyrig 1952b, pp. 105–106.
  47. Robinson 1975, p. 118.
  48. Robinson 1975, p. 115.
  49. Robinson 1975, pp. 118–122.
  50. Seyrig 1952b, pp. 106–107.
  51. 1 2 Seyrig 1952b, p. 106.
  52. Seyrig 1952c, p. 204.

Bibliography

Listen to this article (15 minutes)
Sound-icon.svg
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 21 March 2019 (2019-03-21), and does not reflect subsequent edits.